This document contains study questions about Grice's Cooperative Principle and its four maxims of quantity, quality, relation, and manner. The questions cover identifying the four maxims, examples of observing the maxims in conversations, how speakers can hedge statements or show relevance to avoid accusations of violating the maxims, and examples of how speakers may intentionally flout the maxims through techniques like hyperbole, metaphor, sarcasm, and banter to create conversational implicatures.
This document contains study questions about Grice's Cooperative Principle and its four maxims of quantity, quality, relation, and manner. The questions cover identifying the four maxims, examples of observing the maxims in conversations, how speakers can hedge statements or show relevance to avoid accusations of violating the maxims, and examples of how speakers may intentionally flout the maxims through techniques like hyperbole, metaphor, sarcasm, and banter to create conversational implicatures.
This document contains study questions about Grice's Cooperative Principle and its four maxims of quantity, quality, relation, and manner. The questions cover identifying the four maxims, examples of observing the maxims in conversations, how speakers can hedge statements or show relevance to avoid accusations of violating the maxims, and examples of how speakers may intentionally flout the maxims through techniques like hyperbole, metaphor, sarcasm, and banter to create conversational implicatures.
A3.3 Observing the Maxims 1. What are the four maxims which constitute the Cooperative Principle? 2. What phrase in the Jenny story provides evidence of the Speakers tacit awareness of the maxim of quantity? 3. What phrases might be used if a Speaker wants to avoid providing too much information but also check that the Hearer has enough? 4. Apart from As far as I know how else can Speakers hedge themselves against accusations of (infringing the maxim of quality, or lying). 5. Apart from going back to your point, how else might Speakers show that they are observing the maxim of relation? 6. How else might Speakers show awareness of the maxim of manner? 7. What is necessary for Speakers to make conversational implicatures? a. Knowing the maxims themselves? b. Knowing that Hearers know the maxims? 8. What is the relation between Hearer inference and Speaker implicature? (Are all Hearer inferences also necessarily Speaker implicatures? Hint: Can you think of inferences you have drawn from conversations which were NOT intended by Speakers?) A3.4 Flouting the Maxims 9. Is flouting a maxim of quality the same as lying? Does Cutting think Bowra was lying or flouting the maxim of quality? 10.What implicature is probably being made by Mary when she compliments Peter on his shoes? 11.Think of examples from your own conversations of: a. Hyperbole b. Metaphor c. Sarcasm d. Banter