Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Julia Tongate
Cooper
AP Language Pd. 6
8/3/2016
Interactive Readers Log for Like a Hurricane by Paul Chaat Smith and Robert Allen Warrior
Were out there to create a starting point for basic changes in Indian-white relations. We
reject the alternatives of the feral Indian policy. We reject either extermination of our
cultures, which we refuse to have end up on museum walls for the pleasure of non-
Indians. We reject the chronic and cyclical proverb of reservations and the relocation
transfer of that poverty into Red Ghettoes in the cities. We reject these alternatives. This
is why theres no more end of the trail for us. Were on a new trail. Were creating our
Occasion Response:
This speech took place in a church with an audience of about two hundred people, all of
whom were curious about the Indian movement occurring on Alcatraz. This was the first
time that the Indian occupants on Alcatraz could show [their] public face and tell the
world what they are trying to accomplish and what they stand for (26). The speaker in
this passage, continuously uses we to start each sentence to show the united front that
the Indians have in this revolution (27). Without having this opportunity to speak, the
Indians would not have the means to explain why they reject [the] alternatives and
Tongate 2!
would not be able to forcefully and emotionally state why they are creating [their] own
alternatives (27). Similarly, without writing this book, the authors wouldnt be able to
explain all of the Indian occupations and protests from before 1996 to the clueless,
wondering readers.
What the Indians demanded was title. Free and clear. Nothing less. They did not want to
give Alcatraz to elected tribal officials. They had come too far, sacrificed too much, to
Tone Response:
The authors point out how the Indians have come too far and sacrificed too much to
just hand over the title to the land of Alcatraz (79). They also, through the Indians point
Republican[s] (79). There is a shift between sympathy and hostility in this sentence. The
authors first seem sympathetic towards the Indians cause, they understand the work they
have put into it and why they want the title of the land. In the second half of the sentence,
when the Indians are being biased towards the elected tribal officials by using words
like sell-out the authors have a sense of criticism towards the Indians using this
language. The reader can infer the reason the authors are critical is because of the actions
that the radical Indians organize, which may reflect badly on the whole Indian population.
Tongate 3!
This criticism shows that not every Indian feels the same way about the extreme
measures that some Indians may take to make a point in their protests.
They had a reason to worry. The Nebraska town had a bad reputation on the Pine Ridge
Reservation. Many Indians could tell stories of being cheated, harassed, disrespected, and
worse by the towns two thousand white citizens, whose livelihoods in large part depended
on commerce from the reservation. To cash a check, buy hardware, see a movie, or buy
liquor on had to go to a border town, as the sprawling reservation offered none he of these
services. For many Oglalas, those drives to Gordon, Rushville, or Scottsbluff, Nebraska-
where they were waited on by rednecks who hated Indians and who probably hated
themselves because they made their living from the very Indians they despised-were
Audience Response:
In this passage, the authors go into great depth about why the Indians [have] a reason to
worry about the towns two thousand white citizens(113). The authors explain how the
Indians are cheated, harassed, disrespected, and worse by the white people who [make]
their living from the very Indians they [despise] (113). The authors use an extensive
amount of details so the reader better understands the situation the Indians have to go
through every day of their life. Since the authors use so many details, the reader can infer
that the target audience of the book does not have a strong understanding of the daily
Tongate 4!
troubles Indians and the citizens around Indian reservations go through. This would make
the intended audience of the book be the majority of the population, specifically white
upper class citizens that have little to no contact and information about the lives of
Indians.
Adams opened one office door to see someone rifling through papers. The man broke
down in tears, explaining he was a bureau employee only trying to collect his personal
possessions. He pleaded with Adams not to hurt him. His terror was so great that Adams
had trouble assuring him he would not be harmed, by Adams or anyone else. The depth of
the mans fear made Adams realize that it would be almost impossible for people to
understand, much less sympathize, with the unleashed rage that tore through the building
Purpose Response:
The authors give a different perspective, other than an Indians, in order to show how
little the majority of the population knows about Native Americans. After the Indians
completely dismantled the BIAs offices, a government employee tries to collect some
personal items, but has such great terror of the Indians that he [breaks] down in
tears[pleading] with Adams not to hurt him (165). The terrified employee goes to
show just how little the majority of the population knows about the events that have
Tongate 5!
previously occurred. The reader can predict that the reason the employee is so terrified is
because he and the rest of the population, dont understand why the Indians are acting the
way they are. To them, the Indians that occupied the BIA are a bunch of hooligans that
decided to vandalize a government building, when in reality they are citizens who are
angry about the treatment of their race and finally decided to do something about it. The
authors wrote this piece to explain the Indian occupations that have occurred and the
reasons behind them. By doing this, they give people more knowledge about the Indians,
so possibly in the future, the Indians will not be ignored but instead supported.
Critics would accuse AIM of opportunism, using one reservations troubles to make
headlines for themselves. They suggested AIM took advantage of unsophisticated Indians
who didnt know any better. Instead, the careful, deliberate process that ended in a church
basementmore accurately should be read as the Oglala people choosing to invite the
American Indian Movement into Pine Ridge. No other organization could have
responded to the Oglalas political emergency Inviting AIM was a roll of the dice with
uncertain results, but no one questions that AIM could and would make things
happen. (200)
Subject Response:
The authors begin with focusing on the negative connotations people associate with AIM
and then go into the truth of why AIM has been so popular with many Indian groups.
Tongate 6!
to make headlines for themselves when in reality they are the only organization that
could have responded to the Oglalas political emergency and make things
happen (200). After the reader has learned about all of the obstacles and failures
peaceful Native American protesters have dealt with in the previous chapters, they
understand why AIM has developed and has become such a necessity for the Indians.
AIMs radical way of thinking got them the press that they needed so they could actually
draw attention to their cause. The authors focus on AIM more than other organizations,
because their efforts are the ones that the books audience would have most likely heard
You are concerned for the destruction of property at the BIA building and at Wounded
Knee. Where is your concern for the destruction of our people, for human lives? Lyons
spoke of the Mohicans, the Pequots, of Sand Creek and Big Foot. When will you cease
your violence against our people? Where is your concern for us? Lyons told of Indian
lands flooded to make way for power projects, strip-mined by coal companies, and
plundered of timber. Compare the damage of the BIA and Wounded Knee against the
terrible record and tell us that we are wrong for wanting redress. We ask for justice, and
Speaker Response:
Lyon, the head of a delegation of Indian chiefs addresses the people at Wounded Knee
and the U.S. government in his speech. Lyon asks heavy questions to the U.S. like where
is your concern for the destruction of our people, for human lives? and when will you
cease your violence against our people? showing how emotional and strongly he feels
towards the mistreatment of Indians (228). He also speaks of the Indian lands [that
were] flooded to make way for power projects, strip-mined coal companies, and
plundered of timber showing that he must have done research and put thought into his
examples to make his argument more persuasive (228). The reader can infer that the
reason this speech is so influential and persuasive is because of the leadership Lyon
shows and rightfully has, the work and research that he put into it, and the ability he has
to empathize with the Indians that hear his speech. The authors use Lyons speech as an
example because they support what hes saying which shows a possible bias that they
have against the U.S. government. Both authors are Indian, so a bias that they could have
is that the U.S. government only cares about the white citizens and treat the Indians as if
Smith, Paul Chaat, and Robert Allen Warrior. Like A Hurricane: The Indian Movement from