Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lessons Learned From Failures of Some Housing Projects: Gue & Partners SDN BHD, Malaysia
Lessons Learned From Failures of Some Housing Projects: Gue & Partners SDN BHD, Malaysia
ABSTRACT: This paper presents three case histories of geotechnical failures in housing projects investigated
by the authors and highlights the causes of the failures. The main technical reasons of these failures are
attributed to the inadequacy in the design, in which the platform settlement was not analysed, and also
lacking of quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) during construction. One of the case histories revealed
that the actual pile lengths were only about one third of the recorded lengths. All the three case histories
indicate the need of a proper experienced team from the consultant to supervise the construction to ensure
successful completion. Some preventive measures to mitigate such failures are reiterated here to caution the
professionals in the design of the building platform and foundation. Site supervision is the final defences to
ensure the quality of construction and it should not be compromised in any way.
1
2 THREE CASE HISTORIES OF FAILURES very low N values at various localized depths
2.1 Case One : Excessive Foundation Settlement &
indicated poor compaction of the fill.
Short Piles
There were two piling contractors, namely
This case involved some 40 units of single-storey Contractor A and Contractor B, carrying out the pile
terrace houses and 70 units of double-storey terrace installation at this site. The recorded pile penetration
houses, in which platform settlement and structural by the two contractors was very much different.
cracking were observed. Plates 2 & 3 show the Figures 1 & 2 show the pile penetration length
voids underneath the ground beam and the cracks at record by the two piling contractors. The recorded
the ground beam respectively after fill settlement. pile penetration by Contractor A appears to be very
uniform regardless of the variation of piling platform
and the original topography. However, the piling
penetration records by Contractor B shows a fairly
consistent pattern with the weathering profile of the
ground. The high strain pile tests carried out during
the investigation on the piles installed by Contractor
A have confirmed short piling.
70
Piling Contractor A
Offset 36.2m Offset 13.1m Building
Void 60 Offset 13.1m
Offset 13.1m Platform
Original
Reduced Level (m)
Ground Profile
50
Plate 2 Voids underneath Ground Beam N=34
? ?
N=30
40 ? ?
N=5
N=40
?
? ? ? Filled ground
N=25 ? Original Ground
? ?
30 N=29
60
N=34
Profile with SPT 'N' 30
Building Platform
N=28
50 N=41
?
?
N=5 ? ?
Original Ground Profile Filled ground
Original Ground
Hard Stratum
Borehole
N=29 Pile Toe
Pile Toe of Additional
The affected buildings were on filled ground of 30
?
Profile with SPT 'N'>50 Piles
varying depths up to 20m overlying the undulating 0 40000 80000 120000 160000 200000
Coordinate-X (mm)
meta-sedimentary formation. The platform was Figure 2 Pile Penetration coincides with
mostly filled using the cut materials with significant
Weathering Profile
content of boulders, which subsequently posed
problems to pile installation. The existence of In order to investigate the inconsistency of the pile
boulders in the fill has been confirmed during the penetration and to verify the short piling interpreted
additional subsurface investigation, in which a trial from the dynamic pile testing, some piles were
pit done indicated that a boulder of about 1m in size selected for extraction. The pile extraction has
was discovered. The subsurface investigation also confirmed short piling. Plate 4 shows the pile
revealed that the platform was not properly extraction. There was no sign of welding at the tip
compacted to the normal standard of engineered fill. of the extracted piles, which should have for longer
pile penetration. Plate 5 shows the pile tip condition.
The weathering profile is fairly consistent to the
topographical profile of the original ground as shown
in the borehole logging. The scattering SPT-N
profile of the boreholes in the fill material with some
2
2.2 Case Two : Platform Settlement and Wall
Collapse
3
fill or cut ground and reveals that the foundation
piles were likely to be installed to length instead of
following the normal piling practice based on static
calculation from the soil properties, profile and
normal driving control using appropriate set
criterion.
80
Building
Platform
Figure 3 Sagging Ground Floor Slab Original
Ground Profile
70
Pile B
4
detailed inspection of the collapsed rubble debris as settlement. Figure 6 shows the schematic diagram
shown in Plate 10. It was also found that the sliding explaining the cause of the shear cracks in
resistance of the rubble wall sitting on the RC plinth association with the uneven fill settlement.
was inadequate, because the timber piles were very
weak in taking lateral loading, especially after the
plinth was detached from the settling fill.
Cracks
Cement
Mortar
Void
Differential settlement of filled platform could Plate 11 Shear Cracks on Monsoon Drain
also cause distresses to the infrastructure works.
Plate 11 shows the shear cracks with the whitish
calcite deposits on a cast-in-situ reinforced concrete
(RC) monsoon drain due to differential fill
5
High Groundwater
6
of the failure and the failed slopes is shown in Plate
16.
Client/Developer:
7
time of consolidation is too long, ground treatment
Consultant: should be considered. The foundation design should
consider the settlement of platform to ensure the
1. Inadequate engineering assessments for structural stability of the building. Cracks to
engineering design, such as evaluation of building or other infrastructures would occur when
long-term settlement and fill compression the distortion due to differential settlement exceeds
problems, long-term slope stability at cut the tolerance limits of the buildings. Differential
ground, negative downdrag on piles at filled settlement is very prominent in undulating ground
ground and request for necessary subsurface with varying fill thickness.
investigation.
2. Mistakes or errors in the design without In the three case histories, the subsurface
thorough checking and reviewing processes. investigation did not have proper consolidation
3. Improper engineering specifications, which parameters for settlement analysis. Two of the cases
are not specifically tailored for the project. do not even have any consolidation tests. The only
4. Fails to highlight to the client or coordinate available information is the results of standard
with other design engineers, who will take penetration tests (SPT). This limited subsurface
over the site for subsequent engineering investigation would not provide adequate data for
design, such as the performance of the geotechnical analysis and design.
platform.
5. Fails to provide professional advice to the Desk study of the subsurface investigation should
non-professional client on their commercial start with site reconnaissance study and the design
decisions, which has design implications requirements. Subsurface investigation should be
subsequently. properly planned and supervised by experienced
6. Does not seek input for specialist works, personnel. Gue & Tan (2000a) provide some
which is beyond the field of his or her guidance notes on the subsurface investigation and
expertise. The civil and structural its interpretation. Infrastructure consultant should
consultants only emphasise on the structural consult a geotechnical consultant where need arises.
design.
7. Lack of site supervision or using non- Sometimes, certain provision can be made in the
experienced supervising personnel. design to facilitate ease of confirmation during site
supervision. For instances, the use of spun piles or
Contractor: reinforced concrete piles with PVC pipe at the center
of pile allow simple checking on piles integrity by
1. Evidence of cheating on materials and poor the accessible void in the pile.
workmanship was obvious.
2. Loss of controls over multi-level of sub- Lesson 2 : Settlement & Negative Skin Friction
contractors.
3. Not able to perform the works due to failure to Structural consultants for the above cases had
recognise or understand the conditions of wrongly assumed that the platforms are stable
contract and the specification requirements. without long term settlement. Hence, the pile
4. Not experienced in handling specialist works. foundation had ignored negative skin friction
5. Not serious in QA/QC of supervision. (downdrag) on piles, which subsequently reduce the
factor of safety of foundation when the ground
settled with time. The foundation design only
4 LESSONS LEARNED considered bearing capacity and some piles even
Lesson 1 : Proper Subsurface Investigation & terminated within the fill. Some engineers even try
Design to ignore this reality despite the subject is part of
their standard soil mechanics course. Many
The infrastructure consultant appointed should engineers tend to use their casual observation on the
carry out the subsurface investigation to obtain performance of other completed projects on filled
necessary parameters for the analysis and design of platform for their judgement. However, very often,
platform to ensure that it meets the clients no obvious distresses were observed within the
performance requirements, such as the stability, short period after the completion. This can be best
settlement including estimating the time and illustrated with the analogy of pile load test. Just
magnitude of the consolidation settlement. If the before the imposed load reaches the ultimate
8
capacity, the settlement of the test pile can be well ensure proper compaction even on incompressible
within the allowable limit. However, further loading subsoil would result in long-term settlement. When
the test pile to the ultimate capacity can cause reaching the final platform level, strict compaction
settlement of catastrophic magnitude. In other control is required to ensure formation of relative
words, negative skin friction reduces the designed impermeable capping layer to minimise infiltration
factor of safety on the foundation to unacceptable of surface water, which can trigger collapse
extent due to the designer unaware of the settlement and internal erosion of the fill. This
consequences. practice is also advisable at the end of the day works
to prevent fill saturation by overnight rain during the
Gue et. al. (1999) has presented measurement of progress of earthwork.
negative skin friction on pile for a bridge abutment.
The results of instrumentation indicate the quantum Although the degree of fill compaction can be
of negative skin friction is agreeable with the easily checked using in-situ tests, such as JKR probe
estimate using the conventional neutral plane for shallow, piezocone and undisturbed sampling
concept. It is worth to take note that negative skin from boreholes for laboratory tests, it should be
friction operates at ultimate friction on the pile/soil compacted with proper QA/QC and the design
interface with very small downward movement of consultant team shall supervise the work to ensure
the subsoil surrounding the pile. Normal magnitude proper execution of works in accordance to the
of settlement in most earthwork, even well specification and verification with necessary control
compacted, easily exceeds the critical movement for tests. The loose thickness per compaction lift should
generating negative downdrag. Therefore, the be strictly controlled and usually should no exceed
quantum of negative skin friction is large and should 300mm. Figure 10 shows the differences between
not be overlooked. The negative skin friction can be controlled compaction (proper loose thickness) and
easily revealed by instrumentation to convince the uncontrolled compaction (improper loose thickness).
engineers and the developer.
Lesson 4 : Drainage Details
It is also important to orientate the building layout
to minimise the differential fill settlement. This can Overall drainage designs in many infra-structure
be achieved by arranging the longitudinal axis of the works were not properly designed. This was mainly
building parallel to the contour lines of the original due to inadequate hydrography study of the original
topography, in which the building is underlain by fill terrain and alternation of original drainage system
of uniform thickness and, therefore, less differential after earthworks construction. As in monsoon drain,
settlement. When the relocation of the building is the engineer designed weep holes to reduce the water
not feasible, slip coating or surcharging the subsoil pressure behind the wall, but had overlooked the
can be used to reduce or eliminate the negative possible ingression of rising drain water saturating
downdrag. the fill during the extreme weather, which can cause
collapsed compression and internal erosion of the
Lesson 3 : Earthwork Compaction Control fill. Therefore, at fill platform with potential of
collapse compression, it is more appropriate to locate
Settlement of a filled platform is a combination of the weep holes above the highest design water level
settlement of the subsoil due to the weight of the fill and design the monsoon drain section to take the full
and the compression within the fill. The long-term water pressure up to the weep holes behind the
settlement of subsoil and its duration are directly section during dry season.
related to the thickness of compressible subsoil, their
properties, permeability, thickness and weight of fill. Segmental RC drain section is not recommended
The compression within fill is directly related to the for drain on fill platform because the dislodging of
degree of compaction of the fill. The settlements of the segments due to differential settlement can cause
the platform for all the three case histories are the serious leaking of drain water to saturate the fill and
results of the above combinations. Two of the case may also induce undermining of flowing water
histories have hard soil lumps and boulders within beneath the segments.
the fill, which hampered pile installation giving
premature pile set. Energy breakers should be used to dissipate
kinematic energy of drainage with drop fall.
Earthwork compaction is very important, Sometimes, cascading drain may not be adequate to
particularly within building footprint. Failure to
9
dissipate high water flow during extreme weather
condition.
10
more appropriate to assign the supervision duty to If specialist input is required, which is very
the design consultant as communication of matters common in most civil engineering projects, there
on supervision is more efficient within the same shall be no hesitation to get specialist to involve in
office and, contractually, the professional liability is the development of the preliminary design and
strait forward. For large project, a resident engineer subsequently in the detailed design. Very often, the
should be engaged to supervise the works and specialist input is only requested after the project
directly report to the design consultant. This can encounters problems. Many geotechnical failures
also expedite the clarification process on will eventually lead to serious structural failures as
discrepancies on drawings, bill of quantities and the structural design has no considerations for the
specifications between the contractor and the design adverse consideration of geotechnical aspects. The
consultant. consequential costs of remedial works are expensive
in addition to the delay in delivering the project. In
Lesson 6 : Instrumentation fact, appointment of specialist would enhance the
safety and value engineering of a project.
Instrumentation is often missed out in many
earthworks design. It may be in the construction In all design process, there should be a systematic
drawings, but not implemented by the contractor. way to check and review the designs. The checking
This is very important for design verification and to is to eliminate potential mistakes in the design input,
confirm the performance of the design. In most calculations and the design output, whereas design
cases, the simple and cost effective method of using review is a process of ensuring the adopted
rod settlement gauges on the original ground surface methodology and design concept are in good order.
and surface settlement markers on the finished The design procedures and checklists to the ISO
platform to monitor performance of earthwork requirements are very useful for the checking and
platform. With these instruments, the settlement of reviewing a design in a consistent manner. Ling
subsoil and the fill compression can be recorded. (1998) has given a very elaborative discussion on
For thicker fill, multilevel extensometer can be used design review in accordance to ISO 9001 Quality
to record the relative settlement at respective levels System Requirements.
to a reference datum and provide the settlement
profile of the compressible layer. Settlement profile For large project, it is always advantageous to
will be useful to determine the neutral plane for have an independent consulting engineer to review
estimating negative skin friction. In the foundation the consultants design to prevent serious design
design with the problem of negative skin friction, errors and possibly suggest some design
design verification by instrumentation and necessary improvements for value engineering and also,
testing are required as the uncertainty in estimation possibly, savings in terms of construction time and
of the downdrag force is much higher. Multi-level costs.
strain gauges installed at the test piles with
calibration during pile load test can be used to study For all project, especially if a contract is on
the load transfer mechanism of the pile/soil interface performance basis or end product basis, QA/QC
for estimating negative skin friction and for long- procedures by the contractor to ensure construction
term downdrag monitoring. control to meet the specified performance
requirements should be submitted to the consultant
for review and approval. This should be the
5 PREVENTION OF FAILURE commitment from the contractors to officially
Before preliminary design stage, the Client should substantiate his attempts to achieve quality works
identify the scope of respective consultants to their with the available resources and also to provide a
expertise, preferably with the input from project good official reference for the construction
management specialist. It is also important that monitoring of the design consultant.
experienced personnel in the consultant firm to be
involved in the consultancy service rendered. Lastly, site supervision by the consultant should
Organisation chart and the curriculum vitae of the not be compromised. The level of supervision
involved personnel for the project should be should be determined based on the scope of works.
submitted to the client for review and approval The size of the supervising team depends on the
before the engagement. scope, extent and nature of works, and time period of
the contract. Usually, a team of supervising
personnel is required for construction works of
11
different engineering disciplines or concurrent Gue, S.S. & Tan Y. C. (2000a). Planning of
sessions of different construction activities. The Subsurface Investigation and Interpretation of
developer should also insist full time site supervision Test Results for Geotechnical Design, IEM
and frequent site inspection or visit by the design Seminar on Geotechnical Engineering, The
team to ensure the compliance of works to the design Institute of Engineers, Malaysia: Penang:
and specifications. Malaysia.
Gue, S.S. & Tan Y. C. (2000b). Hill-Site
The consultant should also fully understand and Development Planning, Design, Construction
comply with the laws (Sections 5 & 7 of Uniform and Maintenance Considerations, IEM Seminar on
Building By-Laws) and the statutory requirements Geotechnical Engineering 2000, The Institute of
on site supervision (Form E for the local authority). Engineers, Malaysia: Penang: Malaysia.
Site supervision is further highlighted in a circular Peter Ling, B. T. (1998). Design Reviews in the
from Board of Engineer, Malaysia (BEM, 1989) to Context of ISO 9001 Quality System
all registered engineers. Requirements for Design Professionals. Article of
The Monthly Bulletin of The Institution of
Engineers Malaysia: 33-37, March 1998.
6 CONCLUSIONS
7 REFERENCES
12