Preventing and Healing AIDS Through Our Inner Pharmacy

Roberto Giraldo, M.D.

Chapter 2
HIV cannot be the cause of AIDS
2.1. A total official failure.
After 28 years and billions of dollars invested in research, treatment, prevention and
control of AIDS, official policies have been a complete failure.
Proponents of HIV as the cause of AIDS have failed to cure a single patient, and
their treatment with highly toxic anti-retroviral drugs can actually cause AIDS when given
prophylactically to asymptomatic individuals (19, 23-25).
As if this were not enough, HIV researchers continue to assert that “there is no hope
of a vaccine,” as they did most recently at the 17th World HIV Conference in Mexico City
(16). Officially, they continue to insist on the equation: HIV = AIDS = DEATH
2.2. AIDS cannot be an infectious disease.
As of March 1987 (15), there are many publications that demonstrate with scientific
arguments that what is known as human immunodeficiency virus or HIV does not meet
the epidemiological, biological and common sense requirements to be the cause of the
acquired immunodeficiency syndrome or AIDS (1, 17-36).
HIV is neither necessary nor sufficient for AIDS and does not always precede the
development of the syndrome (1, 15, 26, 32, 36). This is demonstrated by the thousands of
AIDS cases who are HIV negative (37-40) and the whole host of perfectly healthy HIV
positive people who never develop AIDS (41-43). In addition, there are many cases of
individuals who first develop immunodeficiency and only later become HIV-positive
(44-47), which indicates that the phenomenon known as HIV (whatever that may be) is an
effect of the pathogenesis of AIDS rather than its cause.
2.3. HIV cannot cause AIDS.
If it in fact exists, HIV would be a retrovirus, which means it’s a non-pathogenic
virus and therefore could not explain either the immunological abnormalities, the
pathogenesis, the clinical manifestations or the natural history of AIDS (15, 17, 25).
On the other hand, there is plenty of objective documentation that demonstrates
that what we know as HIV is not even a real virus. HIV has never been isolated or purified
as an independent and free viral particle (48-53), as happens with real viruses.
Health professionals, like the general public, think that HIV researchers know how
the supposed HIV virus destroys the immune system and causes AIDS. However, all the
HIV cycles we see diagrammed in well-designed colorful graphics and published in books,
magazines and newspapers showing “HIV” entering and killing T-cells are nothing but
computer generated designs created in the minds of aprioristic researchers and without
any real substance.
2.4. AIDS is a syndrome, not a disease.
After more than two decades of subjective speculation about the pathogenesis of
what is now arbitrarily called the “HIV disease”, researchers from the Laboratory of
Immunology of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and from
universities in Oregon and Israel have recognized that the immune deficiency seen in AIDS
can not be caused directly by “HIV infection,” and suggest that the true cause of AIDS is
chronic and persistent activation of the immune system (54). What that means is excessive
stimulation and exhaustion of the immunological system.
This is exactly what I have been suggesting for years when I say that the real causes
of AIDS are “multiple, repeated and chronic exposure to a variety of immune system
stressor agents” (28-36).
2.5. CD4 T-cell count is not related to AIDS.
As if the above fiasco were not enough for the advocates of HIV, recently after an
investigation with about 3,000 people, researchers from several prominent U.S.
universities, including the School of Public Health at Harvard University, were forced to
recognize that the decrease in CD4 T-cells had no relation to what has been arbitrarily
called “viral load since 1995 “ (55.56). In referring to this study, Dr. Daniel Douek, an
immunologist at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the U.S.
Government confessed that this was “important because it shows that things are not as
obvious as we have thought so far” (56).
This means that treatment with the so-called AIDS “cocktails” that has been
occurring since 1996 using anti-retroviral drugs that are known to be toxic to all human
cells (25), have been based on tests that have nothing to do with the progression,
worsening or improvement of AIDS. CD4 T-cell numbers and counts of the alleged number
of viruses in the blood by the “viral load” test have no scientific validity (55, 56). This is a
terrible fact! How many people have died because of the wrong conclusions of traditional
AIDS researchers?
2.6. Co-factors or immunological stressor agents.
What follows as a consequence is that researchers who enthusiastically defend HIV
as the cause of the AIDS syndrome, never having been able to demonstrate that the
phenomenon known as HIV destroys the immune system and causes AIDS, have resorted
to suggesting a wide variety of agents such as HIV-cofactors or HIV-helpers as being
responsible for the genesis of the disease (57.58).
However, these “cofactors” are in themselves immunosuppressive agents, and
multiple, repeated and chronic exposure to them can generate AIDS – with or without the
“presence of HIV.” I therefore prefer to call these “cofactors” immunological stressor
agents (33).
The following are some of immunosuppressive agents that have been reported as
“cofactors” of HIV (immunological stressors): alcohol, cocaine, heroin, marijuana,
cigarettes, amphetamines, volatile nitrites known as “poppers”, environmental chemical
contaminants, allergens, the cytomegalovirus, herpes virus types 1, 2 and 6, herpes zoster,
the Epstein Barr virus, the adenovirus, other retroviruses, hepatitis viruses A, B and C,
papovaviruses, mycoplasmas and other superantigens, tuberculosis, leprosy, malaria,
trypanosomiasis, filariasis and other tropical diseases, sexually transmitted diseases,
semen, blood clotting factor VIII, fear, anxiety, depression, panic, insomnia, lack of sleep,
strenuous exercise, poor sanitation, poverty, malnutrition and vitamin and antioxidant
deficiencies (59-76).
2.7. The “contagiousness of AIDS” does not exist.
A careful study of the scientific literature provides a clear picture that AIDS is not an
infectious disease, nor is it sexually transmitted (1, 15, 17-36).
The vertical transmission of AIDS from mother to fetus during pregnancy and
childbirth or through breast milk are myths or assumptions unsupported by any objective
evidence (77-79). The transmission of AIDS through blood allegedly infected with HIV is
not certain either (18, 21, 27, 29).
2.8. Oxidation rather than transmission.
On the other hand, sero-negative (“HIV negative”) individuals who have normal
levels of nutrients and antioxidants do not seroconvert to sero-positive (“HIV positive”)
(85-87). Also, “HIV positive” people who have normal blood levels of antioxidant
nutrients, never develop AIDS (88-90). Even in those individuals who develop AIDS
conditions that lead to death, this depends much more on nutritional alterations and
deficiencies than on any other factor (90-107). There are also cases of pregnant “HIV
positive” mothers with normal blood levels of nutrients and antioxidants during pregnancy
giving birth to “HIV negative” babies (108-114).
Therefore, reduced blood levels of nutrients and antioxidants are required for
“seroconversion” to occur, and this is erroneously called “transmission of HIV/AIDS.” The
same is required for the progress of sero-positive individuals to develop the clinical
manifestations of AIDS and die from this syndrome. This clearly indicates that the
decrease in blood levels of nutrients and antioxidants plays an important role in the
pathogenesis of AIDS and in the course and prognosis of the illness.

www.robertogiraldo.com
robgiraldo@aol.com
order at proton@editoraproton.com.br