Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction To Produced Water Treatment PDF
Introduction To Produced Water Treatment PDF
TABLE OF CONTENTS
www.naturetechsolution.com
1 INTRODUCTION
Large quantities of water are produced along with hydrocarbons in oil and gas fields all over
the world. Water production quantities continue to increase as the oil and gas fields reach
maturity. Produced water comes as a bi-product of petroleum production and requires to be
managed efficiently.
A great deal of scientific research has been carried out to determine the consequences of
long-term exposure of produced water on the environment. Some of this research has given
alarming results. It is reported that some of the toxic components in produced water may
cause irreversible damage to the surrounding environment. Because of this potential risk
very considerable efforts are being expended by the oil companies operating in the North-
East Atlantic into developing new techniques to better manage produced water. Remaining
oil in treated and discharged produced water is the principal source for hydrocarbon
discharges from the petroleum sector in the North East Atlantic. The produced water and
hydrocarbon production profile for a typical oilfield is illustrated in Figure 1.
50000
40000
30000
20000
10000
0
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19
Oil field operating time [yr]
Figure 1 - Typical production profile for an oilfield in the North East Atlantic
The figure demonstrates the significant change in the water/oil ratio when the oilfield reach
maturity, and water by far becomes the biggest fraction of the production.
Water is very often found together with petroleum in the reservoirs where the water, as a
consequence of higher density than oil, lays in vast layers below the hydrocarbons in the
porous reservoir media. This water, which occurs naturally in the reservoir, is commonly
known as formation water. After oil and gas production has been occurring for a time, the
formation water will reach the production wells and water production will initiate. The well
water-cuts will normally increase throughout the whole oil and gas field lifetime, such that
when the oil production from the field is shut down, the oil content can be as low as a couple
of percent with ninety eight percent water.
To maintain the hydraulic pressure in the petroleum reservoir, which is reduced as soon as
production is started, seawater is commonly pumped into the reservoir water layer below the
hydrocarbons (Figure 2).
Figure 2 - Re-injection of separated water from an offshore installation (Ill: Courtesy of BJ Services )
This pressure maintenance due to water injection causes high extensions in recoverable
hydrocarbons but simultaneously contributes to increased water production.
from the production wells may be continuously transformed due to injection of seawater, re-
injection of produced water, reservoir stimulation, bacterial activity, introduction of
production chemicals and more.
Produced water is basically a mixture of formation water and injected water but also contains
smaller quantities of:
o Dissolved minerals
o Production chemicals
Dissolved hydrocarbons are found naturally in formation water and can be both toxic and
bio-accumulative. Such water-soluble components, which in produced water are mainly
BTEX (benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene and xylene), polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) and
alkylphenols, are together with heavy metals considered the most harmful contaminants in
produced water.
The most common practice in use in the North East Atlantic for management of produced
water is treatment in gravity based separation equipment and discharge to sea. For a long
time the only governmental regulation for produced water discharges in this petroleum
sector has been concerning concentration of non-polar oil in water (OIW). Little attention
has been given to dissolved organics.
There is now wide agreement within the petroleum industry, governments and scientists that
focus should now be put on dissolved organic components, heavy metals and production
chemicals. The oil in water content shall be as low as possible and the industry shall make
use of best available technology (BAT).
Figure 3 presents history and forecast for the water production on the Norwegian continental
shelf (Norwegian Petroleum Department).
Figure 3 Forecast of water production on the Norwegian continental shelf (Ill: Courtesy of NPD)
The quantity of produced water in Figure 3 that is not discharged to sea is re-injected into the
reservoir or to another formation suitable for disposal.
The long-term effects of such contaminants on the environment are not fully documented
and understood. Some research programmes are completed and several new studies are
underway to map possible consequences for living organisms. Dilution aspects and
movement of species in the oceans makes definite conclusions hard to make. There are so
many variable that the modelling is extremely complex. Results from recent research show
however that fish exposed to alkyl phenols have disturbances in both organs and fertility.
These results are serious and have triggered further investigations.
A common legislation for produced water discharges to sea from offshore installations has
been 40 mg/l (ppm) OIW. The Oslo Paris Convention (OSPAR) has agreed that the
maximum discharge limit is reduced to 30 ppm OIW for the petroleum companies operating
in the North-East Atlantic and that the overall oil discharges in produced water are reduced
by 15% from 1999 levels. In Norway, the oil operators have agreed to implement a policy of
zero environmental harmful discharges within 2005. There shall be no harmful discharges
from any new installation, and existing installations shall continuously work against a
practically achievable zero environmental discharge.
In Norway the Pollution Control Authority (SFT) together with The Norwegian Oil
Industries Associations (OLF) have developed a produced water management tool, the
Environmental Impact Factor (EIF), to meet the zero-discharge strategy. The EIF is a model
for optimising the activities taken to reduce the most harmful components in produced water
for each offshore installation. Contrary to the existing OIW legislation in place today, the
EIF considers all the contaminants in the produced water.
During petroleum production, vast volumes of liquids have to be managed each day.
Deferred production causes high economical losses and therefore continuous operations is
always strived for. The capacity, reliability and performance of the produced water
management system is often critical for continuous oil production particularly in mature oil
field where the water production can greatly exceed the oil production. The water production
system needs to be designed to receive continuously increasing quantities of water as oil
production continues.
Produced water treatment has traditionally taken place in gravity based equipment, where the
difference in the density of the two liquids to be separated is utilized. Such separation is
commonly performed in huge horizontal tanks at different pressures. Flotation of the lighter
components (oil) can be enhanced by means of finely distributed gas bubbles going out of
solution (pressure reduction) and parallel plate packages installed diagonally in the
separation vessel.
A well known technique for separating non soluble components is by filtration. Several
principles for handling produced water have been considered including microfiltration
membranes and media filters. Such treatment technologies are potentially advantageous
because of very good separation degrees can be achieved. However microfiltrations has
found very limited practical application because of cost and poor operability, very high
energy consumption and degradation of the filters elements with use.
Gravity based separation techniques have together with static hydro cyclones been the most
extensive method for treating produced water. Other types of equipment have also been
utilized, mostly in special cases with difficult operating treatment characteristics or small
volumes, though to a less extent. Even if produced water systems more or less have
functioned as intended with respect to the design specifications, the future has brought new
considerations regarding what is sufficient treatment.
A good alternative for disposal of produced water would be to send it back into the reservoir
where it came from as part of the pressure support, or to another suitable formation.
Unfortunately this requires extensive treatment prior to re- injection and due to high costs it
is an economically viable alternative mainly for fields with large water production. Re-
injection could also cause degradation of the reservoir production quality and productivity.
Based on the serious uncertainties connected to the long-term environmental effects from
produced water discharges and in order to be preventive of possible environmental damage
legislation is now being tightened. On the Norwegian continental shelf in the North-East
Atlantic, the government and the oil companies have agreed to zero harmful discharge in
produced water by the end of 2005. The petroleum industries operating in the area are
investigating several ways of meeting the new requirements.
In order to reduce the necessary processing capacity in the petroleum treatment plant, it
could be advantageous to separate as much as possible of the water fraction from the well
stream at an early point in production sequence. By placing first stage water/oil separation
process equipment on the sea bottom it will not be necessary to transport all the water to the
platform processing facility. The Platform facility is greatly simplified with significant
weight reduction. The water separated at the seabed can be injected into a shallower well
formation. Figure 4 presents a graphic illustration of the Troll Pilot subsea installation in the
Norwegian continental shelf.
Figure 4 - The Troll pilot subsea unit (Courtesy of Norsk Hydro (Ill: Arctic))
A further step in reducing the water-cut from the production stream is to locate oil/water
separation process equipment down in the production wells. This technique has been
investigated extensively the last years. The produced water is separated from the oil and gas.
It is then pressurised by downhole hydraulic pumps and re- injected into the reservoir. The
technology is still only in pilot design. It is still very expensive. The complexity increases
with reservoir depth. Vertical Downhole Oil/Water Separation (DOWS) systems have been
used to some extent world wide (< 40) in the last six years. A new more complex horizontal
separation system is under pilot testing pilot testing in Norway.
In order to reduce the water flow to the well production zones, there are two traditional
methods utilized. During mechanical shut-off, cement or mechanical devices blocks the
water pathway by plugging the perforated production section. The chemical shut-off includes
injection of polymers into the reservoir that increases the water viscosity, forms a stable gel
and thereby restricts the water flow ability.
3.4 Sidetracking
As there is still no economically practically method for disposal of all the produced water via
re-injection or various recycle methods, a range of innovative wastewater technologies have
been developed or are under development. The different technologies all have their operating
characteristics that make them suitable for only certain produced waters or operating
characteristics. There is a major focus on new technique to remove dissolved components
from produced water.
Utilization of membranes has been considered for treatment of oily wastewater to reduce
dissolved components. The new systems include the use of nano filtration membranes.
However, although the filtration method has very good separation effect, the high costs and
complexity of these treatment techniques means that applications are only experimental.
Another technology that has been widely tested on both pilot and full scale on the
Norwegian continental shelf is rooted in the solvent properties of supercritical liquids
(CTour). The process utilizes liquid condensate (NGL) from the gas scrubbers and injects it
into the produced water upstream of the hydro cyclones. The dispersed and dissolved
hydrocarbons, which have higher solubility in the condensate, go into the condensate phase
and are separated in the hydro cyclones. This equipment has undergone extensive pilot
testing and its field tests are imminent. The process is very sensitive to the available
condensate quality.
Several modern produced water treatment methods are based on the coalescing of dispersed
oil droplets, often prior to cyclonic separation. The devices are installed upstream of the
cyclonic vessels to increase oil droplet diameters which will result in better separation
degree in the hydro cyclones. The process of coalescence could be accelerated by different
means.
One method is to install a special fibre media in the pipelining or the hydro cyclone vessels
that attracts oil droplets and promotes coalescence into larger aggregates. These systems
have no effect on removing dissolved hydrocarbons, but are simple and easily retrofitted.
The fibre media is sensitive to fouling and any abrasive elements (sand) in the water.
Compact flotation units are hybrid cyclone/degassers that could replace standard degasser
equipment.
Adsorption has proven a successful area in maintaining compliance with produced water
discharges. Unfortunately most processes involve filters and therefore are restricted in
volume or require advanced regeneration processes which could be both energy demanding
and expensive. The adsorption techniques include activated carbon filters with regeneration
by wet air oxidation and oil-adsorbing media canisters based on resins, polymer and clay
technologies.
The Nature Technology Solution treatment of produced water is also based on adsorption
and will be further described in the following chapter (5).
Nature Technology Solution (Nature) provides state of the art treatment and management of
most kinds of contaminated wastewater. Nature is delivering services and equipment for
efficient handling of polluted wastewater from onshore, shipping and the offshore industry
(Figure 6).
Figure 6 - The Shell Draugen Platform in the Norwegian Sea (Photo Courtesy of Shell)
Nature offers a range of physical, chemical and biological treatment methods for industrial
wastewater.
The Nature process for treatment of produced water is based on addition of patented
coagulant/flocculant in existing or partially modified water systems. The agent is injected
into the produced water upstream a static mixer or various process equipment (pumps,
valves etc.) to provide sufficient in- mixing. The agent separates dispersed and dissolved
hydrocarbons and is floated and skimmed off in a flotation vessel downstream the in- mixing
point.
The Nature process combines coalescence and adsorption and significantly reduces dissolved
and dispersed hydrocarbons from produced water to less than 5 ppm. The Nature process
utilizes documented non- hazardous agents for professional treatment of oily produced water.
Implementation of new process equipment is usually not needed. The Nature technology
provides excellent water handling at low capital and operating costs. Rapid processing time
promotes small, less heavy and more compact treatment facilities.
The Nature technology has achieved good results in separating both polar (dissolved) and
non-polar (OIW) hydrocarbons from several produced water types from the Norwegian
continental shelf.
Produced water from the Shell operated Draugen installation was treated with Nature
coagulant in the spring 2002. The OIW concentration was 93 ppm before treatment with
Nature coagulant. Three different doses were used during fixed in- mixing and flocculation
time of 150 and 120 seconds respectively. Draugen salinity was measured to < 3.4 %.
Produced water temperature was 50 C. Figure 7 presents reduction of OIW following
treatment with three different doses Nature coagulant CF 200 (dry solid).
80
60
OIW
40
14
20
9 4
0
0 ppm 20 ppm 40 ppm 60 ppm
Dosing of Nature coagulant CF-200 (dry solid)
The Nature technology also achieved good results in OIW reduction in produced water from
the Statoil Statfjord C installation in the North Sea, winter/spring 2002 (Figure 8).
Figure 8 - The Statfjord C installation in the North Sea (Photo Courtesy of Statoil)
The results are presented in Figure 9. In- mixing and flocculation time was fixed to 30
seconds each. The produced water temperature and salinity was 80 C and 3,6 %
respectively. The OIW concentration in the Statfjord C produced water was 19 ppm before
treatment with Nature coagulant. Three different doses of Nature coagulant CF 200 (dry
solid) were added to the water.
15
11
10 OIW
5 4
5
0
B.T. 5 ppm 10 ppm 15 ppm
Dosing of coagulant CF-200 (dry solid)
Nature has also performed tests on produced water from Kuwait to discover the potential of
the Nature technology on separation of hydrocarbons. The water samples were collected
from the disposal well 501 and the disposal pit.
The produced water trials with the samples from Kuwait revealed that the Nature coagulant
effectively reduced the hydrocarbon concentration in water from the disposal well 501
(Figure 10). The blind test showed an OIW concentration of 18 ppm.
15
Oil in water
10
6
5
3 3 2
0
BT 20 40 60 80
Dosage of Nature CF - 200 [ppm]
Four tests were performed on disposal well water at 50 C. In- mixing and flocculation
periods were set to 60 and 120 seconds respectively.
The water sample from the disposal pit had such low oil in water concentration (2 ppm) that
further testing was cancelled. The salinity in the Kuwait produced water was quite high,
measured to 10 % salt concentration.