ENCE (Outline of Topics and Related Jurisprudence) RULE 128:GENERAL PROVISIONS Sec. 1. Definition (memorize) 1.2) Factual vs. Legal issues 1.b) Judicial, quasi-judicial, administrative proceedings ‘= Ong Chia vs. Republic ‘Sasan, Sr. vs. NLRC, GR No. 176240, Oct. 17, 2008 1.€) Classification of Evidence material evidence vs. relevant evidence direct evidence vs. circumstantial evidence competent evidence vs. incompetent evidence brimary/best evidence vs. secondary evidence Positive vs. negative evidence expert evidence vs. ordinary evidence ‘cumulative vs. corroborative evidence Prima facie evidence vs. rebutting evidence conclusive evidence object evidence documentary evidence testimonial evidence 1.) “Factum probandum™ vs. “factum probans” 2.€) Construction of the Rules of Evidence Quiambao vs. C.A., 454 SCRA 17 Barcenas vs. Tomas, 454 SCRA S93 SSS Chemicals Corp. vs. C.A., Feb. 28, 2001 Sec. 2. Scope 2.2) Evidence in Civil cases vs. evidence in criminal cases ‘Sec. 3. Admissibility of Evidence (memorize) + PP vs. Valdez, 342 SCRA 25, Sept. 25, 2000 Zulueta vs. CA, 253 SCRA 699 Pp vs. Ador 432 SCRA 1, June 14, 2004 SalcedoOrtanez vs. CA, 235 SCRA Ill, Aug. 4, 1994 Beni ee, 2372 (Exemption to the anti-wire tapping act, its requisites) Bank Secrecy Law vs. Anti-Money Laundering Act * | Pentagon vs. CA, 591 SCRA 160 (2009) Types of Admissibility 2) Multiple Admissibility of Evidence aitionade Sales vs. Titan tkeda, G.R. No. 126619. Dec. 20, 2006 2) Conditional Admissibility of Evidence 3) Curative Admissibility of Evidence Sec. 4. Relevancy of Collateral Matters Classification of Collateral Evidence 3) Prospectant or antecedent collateral matter 2) Concomitant collateral matter 3) Retrospectant collateral matter * PP vs. Yatar, May 19, 2004 Admissibility vs. Credibility RULE 129-Wwiiar acer =.Sec. 1. Mandatory Judicial Notice (memorize) ‘* Sienna Realty Corporation vs. Gal-lang (Whether the courts shall take judicial notice of amendments of the Rules of Court) ‘+ DENR vs. DENR Region 12 Court Employees, 409 SCRA 359 '* Mactan-Cebu International Airport vs. Heirs of MarcelinaSero, GR No. 174762, April 16, 2008 ‘+ Suplico vs. NEDA, GR No. 178830, July 14, 2008 '* Candido vs. CA, 253 SCRA 78. Sec. 2. Discretionary Judicial Notice (memorize) '* Expertravel and Tours, Inc vs. CA, 459 SCRA 147 People vs. Tundag, 342 SCRA 704 State Prosecutors vs. Muro, 236 SCRA SOS Landbank vs. Wycoco, 419 SCRA 67 (Judicial Notice vs. judicial knowledge) Garcia vs. Garcia-Recio, 366 SCRA 437 (Doctrine of Processual Presumption) Northwest Orient Airlines vs. CA, 241 SCRA 192 (do) Laureano vs. CA, 324 SCRA 266 (do) PCIB vs. Escolin, 56 SCRA 266 (do) City of Manila vs. Garcia, 19 SCRA 413 (Municipal Ordinances) Republic vs. Court of Appeals 277 SCRA 633 (Court Records) ‘Tabuena vs. Court of Appeals, 196 SCRA 650 Jumamil vs. Café, GR No. 144570 Republic vs. Court of Appeals, 107 SCRA 504 (Post Office Practices) Solidbank Corporation vs. Mindanao Ferroalloy Corporation, 464 SCRA 409 (Banking Practices) La Bugal-B'laan Tribal Assoc. vs. Ramos, 445 SCRA 1 (Financial Condition of the Government) Sec. 3. Judicial Notice, when hearing necessary: ‘* Landbank of the Philippines vs. Banal, GR No. 143276, July 20, 2004 Sec. 4. Judicial Admission: Effects and consequences: * Alfelor vs. Halasan, GR No. 165987, March 31, 2006 ¢ Arroyo Jr. vs. Taduran, 421 SCRA 423 Requisites ‘© Camitan vs. Fidelity insurance Corporatio, GR No. 1636 ‘SpsBinarao Vs. Plus Builders, Inc. GR No. 154430, June 16, 2006 Cuenco vs. Talisay Tourist Sports Complex, G.R. No. 174154, Oct. 17, 2008. ‘Spouses Santos vs. Spouses Lumbao, GR No. 169129, March 28, 2007 Republic vs. Sarabia, 460 SCRA 142 (2005) St. Mary's Farm vs. Prima Real Property, S60 SCRA 704 (2008) People vs. Abello, 582 SCRA 378, (2009) Vidar vs. People, 611 SCRA 216 (2010) ‘+ People vs. Villanueva, 629 SCRA 720 (2010) ‘Averments in the pleadings which are not deemed admissions: Read Sections 1, 8, 11, Rule 8 of the Rules of Court + PNB vs. Refrigeration industries, Inc. G.R. No. 156178, Jan. 20, 2006 Ramos vs. Spouses Dizon, GR No. 137247, Aug. 7, 2006 PP vs. Hernandez, GR No. 108028, July 30, 1998, People vs. Hernandez, GR No. 108028, July 30, 1996 Silot vs. Dela Rosa , GR No. 159240, Feb. 4, 2008 ‘Sec. 2, Rule 118 of the Rule on Criminal Procedure Judicial admission vs. extrajudicial admission (Sec. 26, Rule 132) A- OBJECT EVIDENCE Section 1. Definition of Object Evidence (memorize)Tests for admissibility: a) Relevancy Thing vs. CA, March 8, 2001 (facial similarity to prove kinship) People vs. Rulepa, March S, 2003 (appearance to establish age) People vs. Ulzoron, March 2, 1998 (absence of marks of physical violence) Abalos vs. CA, Dec. 22, 1999 (absence of gun powder) Read: Rule of DNA Evidence b) Competency Read: Art. Ill, Sec. 2 of the 1987 Philippine Constitution “fruit of a poisonous tree doctrine” Exceptions: 1) customs searches; 2) search of moving vehicles (Caballes vs. CA, 2002; Mustang Lumber vs. CA, 257 SCRA 430); 3) checkpoints (PP vs. Balingan, GR No. 105834, Feb. 13, 1995) 4) routine airport procedures (PP vs. Johnson, 348 SCRA 526 (2000) 5) seizure of evidence in “plain view” (PP vs. Rolando Aspiras, Feb. 12, 20012; PP vs. Que Ming Kha et. al, May 29, 2002, PP vs. Valdez, Ibid; PP vs. Estella, Jan. 21, 2003 6) consented searches (PP vs. Compacion, 2002; 7) search incidental to a lawful arrest; PP vs. Jerry Ting Uy, April 12, 2002; PP. vs. Cueno, 298 SCRA 621; PP vs. Catan, Jan. 1992 8) “stop and frisk” situations (PP vs. Salayao, 262 SCRA 255 (1996); PP vs. ‘Malmstedt, 1991); Manalili vs. CA, 1997); 9) Under Exigent and emergency circumstances (PP vs. De Gracia, 233 SCRA 716) 10) _ Inspection of buildings and other premises to enforce safety, sanitary and other building regulations; 11) Searches of vessels and aircraft for violation of immigration, customs and Sets ec sesso 2 Sietree tint ants ae as aioe Veleroso vs. People, 546 SCRA 450 (2008) Sires cok sortase aa aac St ae 2 rats te aca 8 8 onion Seine wees CHARACTER EVIDENCE Sec. 51. Character Evidence ‘SCs. Belagan, 440 SCRA 578 (2004) = People vs. Lee, GR No. 139070, May 29, 2002 RULE 131- BURDEN OF PROOF AND PRESUMPTIONSSec. 1. Definition Burden of sec. 2. nat Proof vs. Burden of Evidence = Alvares vs eSUMPtions (Doctrine of Estoppel) - TANBga-an, GR No. 128568, April 9, 2003 + Eusebio vs. Tan, Gt Sec. 3. Disputable Presucn NO. 225864, Sept. 03,1988 ‘+ Pilipinas Bar ‘tipinas Bank vs. Glee Chemical, GR No, 148320 RULE 132 ~ PRESENTATION OF EVIDENCE e 1. Examination done in open court The Judicial Affidavit Rule ‘The Rule on Examination of a Child Witness 2. Proceedings to be recorded 3. Rights and Obligations of a Witness 4. Order in the examination of an individual witness S. Direct Examination 6. Cross-examination 7. Re-direct examination 8. Re-cross examination 9. Recalling a witness 10. Leading and misleading questions ‘*._ PP vs. Cana, GR No. 139229, April 22, 2002 Sec. 11. Impeachment of adverse party's witness ‘* Chua Gaw vs. Chua, GR No. 160855, April 16, 2008 Sec. 12. Party may not impeach his own witness ‘= Gomez vs. Gomez-Samson, GR No. 156284, Feb. 06, 2007 Sec. 13. How witness is impeached by evidence of inconsistent statements, ‘s Office of the Court Administrator vs. Morante, A.M. No. No. P-02-1555, April 16, 2004 ‘Sec. 14. Evidence of good character of witness ‘Sec. 15. Exclusion and separation of witnesses ‘Sec. 16. When witness may refer to memorandum ‘Sec. 17. When part of transaction, writing or record given in evidence ‘= Eagleridge Development Corp. vs. Cameron, GR No. 204700, Nov. 24, 2014 Sec. 18. Right to inspect writing shown to witness, PERE ERE RE AUTHENTICATION AND PROOF OF DOCUMENTS ‘Sec. 19. Classes of documents ‘= Rosario vs. Limeaoco, GR No. 177392, Nov. 26, 2012 Sec. 20. Proof of private document w Cereado-Siga vs. Cercado, GR No. 185374, March 11, 2015, ‘Authentication of Electronic document (Rule 5, Electronic Evidence Rule) sec. 21. When evidence of authenticity of private document is necessary ‘* Quintos vs. DBP, GR No. 168258, Aug. 17, 2015 (Exceptions *78) Sec. 22. How genuineness of handwriting proved "= _ Krystle Realty vs. Alibin, GR No. 196117, August 13, 2014 Sec. 23. Public documents as evidence ‘= Kummer vs. People, GR No. 174461, Sept. 11, 2013 Sec. 24. Proof of official record '* Del Rosario vs. Limcaoco, Nov. 26, 2012 Sec. 25. What attestation of copy must state '* Heirs of Gabatan vs. CA, GR No. 150206, March 13, 2009 Sec. 26.irremovabllity of public record Sec. 27. Public record of private document Sec. 28. Proof of lack of record People vs, Lazaro, GR No. 112090, Oct. 26, 1999