Professional Documents
Culture Documents
No Section Page
1.0 Abstract 2
2.0 Objective 3
3.0 Introduction 3
5.0 Methodology 7
6.0 Results 9
7.0 Discussion 14
8.0 Conclusion 16
9.0 References 16
10.0 Appendix 17
ABSTRACT
The main objective of this experiment is to determine the effect of operation time to the
composition and volume of distillate, and also wants to determine the relationship between the volumes
of distillate with composition of distillate. In distillation process, the purities of distillate is dependent
on some factors such as the operating time, temperature, reflux factor and chemical properties. The unit
operation distillation is a method used to separate the components of a liquid solution, which depends
upon the distribution of these various components between a vapor and a liquid phase. All components
are present in both phases. in this experiment, distillation bubble cap has been used which is consist of
several trays in the column. This device has a built-in seal which prevents liquid drainage at low gas
flow rates. Gas flows through a center riser, reverses the flow under the cap, passes downward through
the annulus between riser and cap and finally passes into the liquid through a series of openings or
slots in the lower side of the cap. At the bottoms contain mixture of ethanol and water heated around
70oc and 90oc where is in the range of ethanol boiling point. The top product (distillate) is contains of
mostly pure ethanol which is obtained from the condensation process. The purities of distillate
composition is determine by reflection index measurement. This experiment is run in 1 hour, and the
data taken in every 5 minutes and recorded. A table of operation data has been constructed for record
all the results. The general relationship between volume of distillate and composition of distillate can
be conclude as, the more volume of distillate produce, the more higher the composition of desired
distillate obtained. However, the result obtained is not the exact result because there are some errors
occur during the experiment. Therefore, some precautious steps have been suggested in order to
improve the result.
1.0 OBJECTIVE
The main objective of this experiment is to determine the effect of operation time to the
composition and volume of distillate, and also wants to determine the relationship between the volumes
of distillate with composition of distillate.
2.0 INTRODUCTION
ethanol vapor will enter the bubble cap distillation column. Condenser will condense the ethanol
vapor at the top with cooling water. The condensate will undergo a series of cooling before
collected to make sure vapor is complete condense into liquid phase. After finish this experiment,
we can determined the time needed for a certain composition to distillate and indentified the
relation between reflux ratios with the volume of distillate.
3.0 THEORY
A group of operations for separating the components of mixtures is based on the transfer of
material from one homogeneous phase to another. Unlike purely mechanical separations these
methods utilize differences in vapour pressure or solubility, not density or particle size. The unit
operation distillation is a method used to separate the components of a liquid solution, which
depends upon the distribution of these various components in their volatilities in boiling liquid
mixture. Distillation is used to purify a compound by separating it from a non-volatile or less-
volatile material. When different compounds in a mixture have different boiling points, they
separate into individual components when the mixture is carefully distilled.
a) Composition of feed,
c) Trace elements that can severely affect the Vapor liquid equilibrium of liquid mixtures
e) State of trays.
The state of the feed mixture and feed composition affects the operating lines and hence the
number of stages required for separation. It also affects the location of feed tray. Some columns are
designed to have multiple feed points when the feed is expected to contain varying amounts of
components. The actual number of trays required for a particular separation is dependent on the
efficiency of the plates. Thus, factors that cause a decrease in tray efficiency changes the
performance of the column.
b) Type and number of down comers making up the down comer area
c) Direction and path of the liquid flowing across the contacting area of the tray
d) vapor (gas) flow direction through the (orifices in) the plate
e) Presence of baffles, packing or other additions to the contacting area to improve the
separation performance of the tray
a) Bubble cap tray has riser or chimney fitted over each hole, and a cap that covers the riser.
The cap is mounted so that there is a space between riser and cap to allow the passage of
vapour. Vapor rises through the chimney and is directed downward by the cap, finally
discharging through slots in the cap, and finally bubbling through the liquid on the tray.
b) Sieve trays come with different hole shapes (round, square, triangular, rectangular (slots),
star), various hole sizes (from ~2 mm to ~25 mm) and several punch patterns (triangular,
square, rectangular).
c) Valve tray come in a variety of valve shapes (round, square, rectangular, triangular), valve
sizes, valve weights (light and heavy), orifice sizes and either as fixed or floating valves.
d) Combinations of these types are applied: plates with both sieve openings and valves, as
well as plates with both light and heavy valves.
4.0 METHODOLOGY
4.2Procedures
1. Seven set of methanol-water mixture were prepared using pipette. After that, the refractive
index of the mixtures was determined using refractometer.
2. 32 liter of the feed of ethanol-water mixture of 30 % ethanol and 70 % water was prepared.
3. Every apparatus was in good condition before experiment started.
4. Then, the position of the valves were adjusted as below:
a. Opened: V2, V8, V10
b. Closed: V1, RCV1, V3, V4, V5, V6,V7, V9, FCV2
5. Electrical heater was switched on as the cooling water pump was switched on.
6. Initially power supply is the maximum, it was minimised after the feed boiled.
7. Reflux control was set at 2.0 by opening the reflux control valve (RCV1) slowly. The distillate
was following to RI 1B and the extra distillate was following to RI 1A and return to boiler.
8. Distillate was controlled to not flow back to boiler by:
a. V2 closed
b. V3 opened (V3 closed if V4 opened)
c. V4 opened (to get sample)
9. The distillate collected was measured. Sample composition was analyzed using refractometer to
get the refractive index.
10. Step 9 and 10 were repeated for every 5 minutes. The result was recorded as Table 4.1.
1. The flow meters should be operated smoothly in order to avoid pressure surges within the
equipment
2. The flow rates of liquids should not exceed the maximum rates of the flow meter
3. Safety glasses and safety helmet must be worn at all times in the laboratory and appropriate
rubber gloves must be worn when organic solvents are handled
4. Check the zero errors of the manometers and adjust the reading to zero if necessary.
5. After the process was finished, turn the reboiler power switch off and Main power control
switch off. When condensate no longer collects, the cooling water to the condensers need to be
shut off.
5.0 RESULT
TIME 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60
TI 1 79.0 78.9 79.1 78.8 78.7 78.9 78.8 78.8 78.7 78.7 78.6 78.6
TI 1A 78.3 79.3 79.0 78.9 78.8 79.0 78.8 79.4 78.8 78.8 78.7 78.7
TI 1B 76.0 76.0 76.0 76.0 76.0 76.0 76.0 76.0 76.0 76.0 76.0 76.0
TI 2
79.5 78.5 79.4 79.4 79.3 79.4 79.3 79.3 79.2 79.2 79.0 79.2
TI 2A
79.2 79.2 80.1 79.5 78.8 79.0 78.9 78.9 78.8 79.0 78.8 78.8
Temperature in plate
TI 2B
79.0 79.0 79.0 79.0 79.0 79.0 79.0 79.0 79.0 79.0 79.0 79.5
TI 2C
- - - - - - - - - - - -
TI 2D
75.0 76.0 76.0 76.0 77.0 77.0 77.0 77.0 77.0 77.0 77.0 77.0
TI 2E
76.0 76.0 77.0 77.0 78.0 78.0 78.0 79.0 79.0 79.0 79.0 79.0
TI 2F
76.0 77.0 77.0 77.0 78.0 78.0 79.0 79.0 79.0 79.0 79.0 79.0
TI 3
78.0 78.0 79.0 79.0 79.0 80.0 80.0 80.0 80.0 80.0 80.0 80.0
Initial
temperatu- TI 4 - - - - - - - - - - - -
re
Temperat- TI 5 24.0 24.5 24.5 25.0 26.0 26.0 28.5 27.0 27.0 27.5 28.0 28.0
ure of
cooling TI 6 28.0 29.0 29.5 31.0 32.0 32.5 32.5 32.5 32.5 34.0 34.5 35.0
water
RI 1A 5.2 5.4 5.8 5.8 5.4 5.0 5.6 5.6 5.4 5.2 5.6 5.4
Reflux
RI 1B 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Ratio of Reflux
Distillate volume 195 220 220 225 220 225 225 225 220 225 230 180
1.363 1.363 1.363 1.363 1.363 1.363 1.363 1.363 1.363 1.363
Reflexion index 1.3630 1.3630
5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Voltage 24
Current 170
Volume of
Ethanol (ml) 0 2 5 10 15 18 20
Volume of
Water (ml) 20 18 15 10 5 2 0
(mole)
Ethanol (%)
1.36
1.355
refraction index
1.35
y = -5E-06x2 + 1.334
1.345
1.34
1.335
1.33
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
% mole of ethanol
77.5
77
76.5
76
75.5
75
74.5
74
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
time (minutes)
200
y = -0.035x + 218.64
150
100
50
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
time (minute)
6.0 DISCUSSION
Initially, the refraction index is directly proportional to % mole of ethanol, giving a positive value of
slope. The slope is reducing as % mole of ethanol increases, and at one point, the refraction index
becomes indirectly proportional to the % mole of ethanol resulting in negative value of slope. As the
graph illustrates the relation between mixed refraction index and ethanol composition, it is used as a
standard reference for the samples on order to determine the percentage of ethanol in the distillate.
The values of % mole of ethanol are constant except for the time at 10 minutes. We can simply say that
along the distillation, the percentage of ethanol in the distillate does not undergo any change.
Theoretically, the composition of the ethanol will decrease as time goes on because the experiment is
conducted in an enclosed system at a constant reflux ratio. The amount of ethanol left in liquid phase
will decrease as most of it is distilled out via gas phase and at the same time; there is no fresh feed of
ethanol to the system.
The small difference of the results compared to the theory is due to the fact that the distillate is not put
into the refractometer immediately. Ethanol has high value of vapor pressure and can easily vaporize.
If the distillate is exposed to the surrounding for too long before being valued in the refractometer,
ethanol will vaporize to the surrounding and the value read from the refractometer is not accurate.
It can be seen that the value of volume measured are almost same. The linear equation that represents
the data shows a straight line with a negative slope. Theoretically, the volume of distillate will remain
constant throughout the experiment. Although the slope is negative, we can say that our results do obey
the theory as the value of the slope is too small to be considered.
1. Can overcome flood problem although the air rate used is low.
2. Range of operational temperature for Bubble-Cap Column is wider compared to the Packed-
Distillation Column.
3. If the flow rate of the mixture is low, the Bubble-Cap Column can provide more surface are for
effective interference.
4. It is more economical compared to the Packed-Distillation Column.
5. The curly tubes acting as cooler can be arranged in a more pack arrangement in order to achieve a
better result.
6. It is considered as more relevant because it is easier to be cleaned when any unwanted particle is
found in the column.
Errors
1. Parallax error that occurs when taking the reading of the refraction index, volume of distillate
which is caused by the false position of eyes that is not parallel to the level.
2. The fluid level at RI 1B is not constant at 2.0 and always changing resulting in inconstant volume
of distillate.
3. Systematical error in the usage of watch.
4. Dirty glass condition at refractometer may affect the value of refraction index.
5. There is probability that the volume of distillate may be lower than it really is as the result of
vaporization of ethanol to the surrounding. This happens when taking it out from the valve V4 i.e.
the ethanol temperature is greater than the surrounding temperature.
6. Unwanted particle in the column and instrument may affect the result of the experiment.
Precaution
1. The glass of refratometer must be cleaned with distilled water every time before taking the reading.
2. Eye position must be parallel with the level of distillate.
3. Reflux RI 1B must be set constant at 2.0.
4. All the instruments used must be free from any unwanted particle.
5. Operational temperature must always be under 100C to prevent the water from vaporizes.
6. All the valves must be close tightly.
7.0 CONCLUSION
From the experiment, the % mole of ethanol is not changing with time along the distillation
process. Mole fraction of ethanol obtained is in the range of 76.94 ~ 77.59%. The volume of distillate
is also not changing with time along the distillation process. The value of the distillate volume is in the
range of 180 ~ 230 mL.
8.0 REFERENCES
1. Geankoplis, Christi J., Transport Processes And Unit Operations, Third Edition, Prentice Hall
International, New Jersey, 1993.
2. McCabe, Warren L., Unit Operation Of Chemical Engineering, Fifth Edition, McGraw-Hill Inc.,
New York, 1993.
3. Perry, Robert H., Don Green, Perrys Chemical Engineering Handbook, Sixth Edition, McGraw-
Hill International Edition, New York , 1993.
5. Sinnott, R.K., Kejuruteraan Kimia Jilid 6, Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, Kuala Lumpur, 1994.
9.0 APPENDICES