Group 2 - Bio100 Spring 2017 - A4D1.

Page 1 of 1

Back Evaluation Rubric

5: The review precisely comments on the strengths and weaknesses of the assignment. It

provides a constructive suggestion for improvement that is specific and relevant to the paper.

Suggestion contributes greatly in improving the paper.

4: The review comments on the strengths and weaknesses of the assignment. It provides a

suggestion for improvement that is specific and relevant to the paper. However, the suggestion

does not contribute significantly in improving the paper.

3: The review comments on the strengths and weaknesses of the assignment. It provides a

suggestion for improvement, but is not specific or relevant to the paper. Suggestion was not

useful in improving the paper.

2: The review vaguely comments on the strengths and weaknesses of the assignment. It does not

provide a suggestion for improvement, or the suggestion seems to be incomplete or inaccurate.

1: The review is incomplete or unclear. It does not properly provide comments on strengths or

weaknesses of the assignment, nor does it provide suggestion for improvement. Comment is

inappropriate or irrelevant to the paper.