Professional Documents
Culture Documents
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: The cultivation of the mangrove-derived fungus Rhytidhysteron rufulum AS21B in acidic condition chan-
Received 28 January 2017 ged its secondary metabolite profile. Investigation of the culture broth extract led to the isolation and
Revised 23 February 2017 identification of two new spirobisnaphthalenes (1 and 2) together with eleven known compounds (3
Accepted 24 February 2017
13) from the crude extract of the fungus grown under an acidic condition as well as six known com-
Available online 27 February 2017
pounds (4, 10, 1417) were isolated from the crude extract of the fungus grown under a neutral condi-
tion. Their structures were elucidated on the basis of extensive spectroscopic data. The isolated
Keywords:
compounds were evaluated for their cytotoxicity against two human cancer cell lines, Ramos lymphoma
Endophytic fungi
Rhytidhysteron rufulum
and drug resistant NSCLC H1975. Compounds 2 and 10 displayed the most promising anti-tumor activity
Spirobisnaphthalene against both cancer cell lines.
Anti-cancer activity 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Fungal cultivation
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2017.02.054
0968-0896/ 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
I. Siridechakorn et al. / Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry 25 (2017) 28782882 2879
Table 1
1 13
H (400 MHz) and C (100 MHz) NMR data of compounds 1 and 2.
Position 1a 2b
dC, type dH, mult. (J in Hz) dC, type dH, mult. (J in Hz)
1 103.3 C 101.2 C
2 28.8 CH2 2.19, m1.90, m 29.2 CH2 2.18, m
3 23.5 CH2 2.37, m 22.6 CH2 2.49, m2.59, m
4 139.3 CH 7.10, dd (6.4, 3.6) 136.7 CH 7.08, br m
4a 131.3 C 131.5 C
5 192.5 C 187.7 C
6 55.6 CH 3.41, d (4.0) 132.9 CH 6.17, d (10.0)
7 57.2 CH 3.77, t (4.0) 142.0 CH 6.91, d (10.0)
8 64.3 CH 5.10, br s 63.9 CH 5.69, dd (5.6, 3.2)
8a 43.6 CH 3.27, br s 45.1 CH 3.31, m
10 147.8 C 146.4 C
20 110.7 CH 6.99, d (8.0) 109.7 CH 6.86, d (7.6)
30 128.6 CH 7.48, dd (8.0, 1.2) 127.8 CH 7.39, t (8.0)
40 121.7 CH 7.57, d (8.0) 120.8 CH 7.50, d (8.0)
4a0 135.2 C 134.3 C
50 121.4 CH 7.56, d (8.0) 120.8 CH 7.49, d (8.0)
60 128.5 CH 7.48, dd (8.0, 1.2) 127.6 CH 7.43, t (8.0)
70 110.3 CH 6.96, d (8.0) 109.4 CH 6.88, d (7.6)
80 148.2 C 147.0 C
8a0 114.6 C 113.5 C
8-OAc 169.9 C@O
8-OAc 21.0 CH3 2.11, s
a
Recorded in CDCl3.
b
Recorded in acetone-d6.
treatment of lung cancer models, including those with EGF receptor 4.1. General experiment procedures
(EGFR) mutations (L185R/T790M) resistant to reversible first-gener-
ation EGFR inhibitor like Gefitinib. It was developed and marketed The UV spectra were recorded on a Biotek Powerwave XS2
by Boehringer Ingelheim, and was first approved in 2013 by US (USA). The IR spectra were recorded with a PerkinElmer FTS FT-
I. Siridechakorn et al. / Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry 25 (2017) 28782882 2881
IR spectrophotometer. Optical rotations were measured on a Perki- tion L (193.0 mg) by CC Sephadex-LH20 with MeOH to give five
nElmer 341 polarimeter. NMR spectra were acquired on a Varian subfractions (LA-LE). Compound 4 (4.1 mg) was derived from sub-
Mercury-400 Plus NMR spectrometer and 400 MHz Bruker FTNMR fraction LD (101.3 mg) by CC with 25% acetone-hexane.
Ultra Shield with TMS as internal standard. HRESI-MS was carried Rhytidenone G (1): yellow viscous oil, a24 92.8 (c 0.10,
D
out on a micrOTOF-Q II ESI mass spectrometer. HPLC was per- MeOH); UV (MeOH) kmax (log e) 250 (2.42), 260 (2.43) nm; IR
formed on Thermo Finnigan (TSP) with preparative column Inertsil (neat) mmax 3389 cm1; 1H and 13C NMR (acetone-d6, 400 MHz),
ODS-3 (GL Science, 5 lm, 20 250 mm). Column chromatography see Table 1; HRESIMS m/z 359.0941 [M+Na]+ (calcd for C20H16O5-
(CC) was carried out on silica gel (Silicycle, SiliaFlash P60 40-63 mm Na, 359.0895).
and SiliaFlash F60 40-63 mm). Sephadex LH-20 was also used for CC. Rhytidenone H (2): pale yellow gum; a24
D 57.4 (c 0.15, MeOH),
Precoated plates of silica gel 60 F254 were used for analytical
UV (MeOH) kmax (log e) 230 (2.44), 250 (2.45), 260 (2.46) nm; 1H
purposes.
and 13C NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz), see Table 1; HRESIMS m/z
385.1186 [M+Na]+ (calcd for C20H16O5Na, 385.1152).
4.2. Extraction and isolation
4.3. Anti-tumor assay
The fungus R. rufulum AS21B was isolated from leaves of Azima
sarmentosa, collected from the mangrove forest in Samutsakhon
Human lymphoma Ramos cells and NSCLC H1975 cells were
province, Thailand in July 2008. The strain AS21B was grown on
cultured to the exponential growth phase in RPMI 1640 supple-
potato dextrose agar (PDA) plate at room temperature for 7 days.
mented with 10% (v/v) fetal calf serum in a humidified atmosphere
Five pieces (5 5 mm2) of mycelia agar plugs were inoculated into
containing 5% CO2.
1 L Erlenmeyer flasks (100) containing 200 mL of sabouraud dex-
Cytotoxicity against Ramos and H1975 cells was assessed as fol-
trose broth (SDB) in acidic condition (pH 5) as well as the normal
lows: 4 104 cells seeded onto 96-well plates were incubated with
SDB. The cultivation was kept at room temperature under static
compounds at the indicated concentrations at 37 C for 24 h
conditions for 21 days.
(Ramos) or 72 h (H1975). Cell viability was determined using mea-
The filtration was used to separate the mycelia and broth from
surement ATP level in living cells method by CellTiter-Glo kit
each other. The filtrate was extracted with EtOAc 3 times and evap-
according to the manufacturers instructions. Ibrutinib and afatinib
orated under reduced pressure to give an acidic condition crude
were used as reference drug for Ramos and H1975 cell,
extract (5.53 g). The crude extract was subjected to column chro-
respectively.
matography (CC) over silica gel, eluting with a gradient of ethyl
acetate (EtOAc)-hexane (100% hexane to 100% EtOAc), providing
Acknowledgments
eight fractions (AH). Fraction A (235.8 mg) was recrystallized by
hexane to give solid and mother liquor (ML) fraction. The ML
This work was supported by the Thailand Research Fund (TRF)
(221.1 mg) was further purified by CC with 30% CH2Cl2-hexane giv-
(Grant No. BRG5980002) and the National Natural Science Founda-
ing compound 3 (11.4 mg). Fraction B (98.4 mg) was subjected to
tion of China (Grant No. 21561142002).
CC with 50% CH2Cl2-hexane to yield compound 4 (15.8 mg)
together with three subfractions (BA-BC). Compound 6 (2.7 mg)
was purified from subfraction BC (10.0 mg) by CC with 25% A. Supplementary data
EtOAc-hexane. The recrystallization of fraction C (140.7 mg) from
methanol (MeOH) provided compound 5 (2.7 mg) and ML fraction. Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
The ML (138.0 mg) was further separated by CC with 50% CH2Cl2- the online version, at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2017.02.054.
hexane yielding six subfractions (CA-CF). Compounds 2 (1.9 mg), 8
(1.0 mg) and 9 (3.5 mg) were derived from subfraction CD References
(24.4 mg) by CC with 50% CH2Cl2-hexane. Fraction E (372.5 mg) 1. Zhang HW, Song YC, Tan RX. Nat Prod Rep. 2006;23:753771.
was subjected to CC eluted with 20% EtOAc-hexane, providing 2. Gunatilaka AAL. J Nat Prod. 2006;69:509526.
twelve subfractions (EA-EL). Compound 11 (1.5 mg) was derived 3. Strobel GA. Microbes Infect. 2003;5:535544.
4. Guan S, Sattler I, Lin W, Guo D, Grabley S. J Nat Prod. 2005;68:11981201.
from subfraction EE (7.6 mg) by CC with 40% CH2Cl2-hexane while
5. Xu F, Zhang Y, Wang J, et al. J Nat Prod. 2008;71:12511253.
compound 7 (3.2 mg) was obtained from subfraction EG (27.5 mg) 6. Kjer J, Wray V, Edrada-Ebel R, et al. J Nat Prod. 2009;72:20532057.
by CC with 10% EtOAc-benzene. The purification of subfraction EI 7. Jiao P, Swenson DC, Gloer JB, Campbell J, Shearer CA. J Nat Prod.
(13.1 mg) by preparative HPLC with isocratic condition of 65% ace- 2006;69:16671671.
8. Hu H, Guo H, Li E, Zhou Y, Che Y. J Nat Prod. 2006;69:16721675.
tonitrile-H2O yielded compound 13 (2.5 mg). Compounds 1 9. Macas-Rubalcava ML, Hernndez-Bautista BE, Jimnez-Estrada M, et al.
(10.4 mg) and 10 (50.1 mg) were derived from subfraction EK Phytochemistry. 2008;69:11851196.
(95.6 mg) by CC with 10% EtOAc-benzene. Fraction H (120.6 mg) 10. Matnez-Luis S, Della-Togna G, Coley PD, Kursar TA, Gerwick WH, Cubilla-Rios
L. J Nat Prod. 2008;71:20112014.
was subjected to passage over Sephadex LH-20 using MeOH as sol- 11. Van der Sar SA, Blunt JW, Munro MHG. Org Lett. 2006;8:20592061.
vent to afford four subfractions (HA-HD). Compound 12 (6.1 mg) 12. Cai Y-S, Guo Y-W, Krohn K. Nat Prod Rep. 2010;27:18401870.
was derived from subfraction HB (25.3 mg) by preparative HPLC 13. Chen X, Shi Q, Lin G, Guo S, Yang J. J Nat Prod. 2009;72:17121715.
14. Gary S, Bryn D, Uvidelio C, James H. J Nat Prod. 2004;67:257268.
with isocratic condition of 75% acetonitrile-H2O. 15. Keith C, Jenny H. Science. 1999;285:17421745.
The neutral condition crude extract (5.89 g) was also subjected 16. Yamanaka T. Mycologia. 2003;95:584589.
to passage over Sephadex-LH20 using MeOH as a solvent to afford 17. Atthiesh C, Erhard A-P, Drake HL. J Basic Microbiol. 1997;37:335343.
18. Chung Y-M, Wei C-K, Chuang D-W, et al. Bioorg Med Chem.
eight fractions (I-P). Fraction K (1.58 g) was purified by CC over sil- 2013;21:38663872.
ica gel with 30% acetone-hexane to give nine subfractions (KA-KI). 19. Singh SB, Zink DL, Liesch JM, et al. J Org Chem. 1994;59:62966302.
Compounds 10 (6.7 mg) and 15 (77.4 mg) were derived from sub- 20. Wipf P, Lynch SM, Birmingham A, et al. Org Biomol Chem. 2004;2:16511658.
21. Macas-Rubalcava ML, Sobrino Ruiz-Velasco ME, Melndez-Gonzlez C,
fraction KD (97.4 mg) by CC with 25% EtOAc-benzene. The recrys-
Hernndez-Ortega S. J Agric Food Chem. 2014;62:35533562.
tallization of subfraction KF (142.1 mg) from MeOH provided 22. Sakemi S, Inagaki T, Kaneda K, et al. J Antibiot. 1995;48:134142.
compound 16 (89.6 mg). Subfraction KG (206.1 mg) was further 23. Pudhom K, Teerawatananond T. J Nat Prod. 2014;77:19621966.
purified by CC with 20% acetone-hexane to afford compound 14 24. Krohn K, Michel A, Flrke U, Aust H-J, Draeger S, Schulz B. Liebigs Ann Chem.
1994;1:10991106.
(188.0 mg). Compound 17 (19.8 mg) was derived from subfraction 25. Pudhom K, Teerawatananond T, Chookpaiboon S. Mar Drugs.
KI (60.3 mg) by recrystallization from MeOH. Fractionation of frac- 2014;12:12711280.
2882 I. Siridechakorn et al. / Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry 25 (2017) 28782882
26. Dong JY, Song HC, Li JH, et al. J Nat Prod. 2008;71:952956. 29. Pao W, Miller VA, Politi KA, et al. PLoS Med. 2005;2:e73.
27. Ohishi H, Chiba N, Mikawa T, Sakaki T, Miyaji S, Sezaki M. Jpn Pat. 30. Li D, Ambrogio L, Shimamura T, et al. Oncogene. 2008;27:47024711.
1989;01294686. 31. Prachya S, Wiyakrutta S, Sriubolmas N, et al. Planta Med. 2007;73:14181420.
28. Luciano JC, Ana CX, Wahlquist AE, Hill EG. Blood. 2013;121:48614866.