You are on page 1of 12

>Warning # 849 in column 23.

Text: in_ID
>The LOCALE subcommand of the SET command has an invalid parameter. It could
>not be mapped to a valid backend locale.
CORRELATIONS
/VARIABLES=USIA Y1
/PRINT=TWOTAIL NOSIG
/MISSING=PAIRWISE.

Correlations
Notes

Output Created 14-APR-2017 11:03:56


Comments
Input Active Dataset DataSet0
Filter <none>
Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data
File 72

Missing Value Handling Definition of Missing User-defined missing values are


treated as missing.
Cases Used Statistics for each pair of variables
are based on all the cases with valid
data for that pair.
Syntax CORRELATIONS
/VARIABLES=USIA Y1
/PRINT=TWOTAIL NOSIG
/MISSING=PAIRWISE.
Resources Processor Time 00:00:00,02
Elapsed Time 00:00:00,06

[DataSet0]

Correlations

USIA Y1
USIA Pearson Correlation 1 ,086
Sig. (2-tailed) ,473
N 72 72
Y1 Pearson Correlation ,086 1
Sig. (2-tailed) ,473
N 72 72

Page 1
NONPAR CORR
/VARIABLES=USIA Y1
/PRINT=SPEARMAN TWOTAIL NOSIG

Nonparametric Correlations
Notes

Output Created 14-APR-2017 11:03:56


Comments
Input Active Dataset DataSet0
Filter <none>
Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data
File 72

Missing Value Handling Definition of Missing User-defined missing values are


treated as missing.
Cases Used Statistics for each pair of variables
are based on all the cases with valid
data for that pair.
Syntax NONPAR CORR
/VARIABLES=USIA Y1
/PRINT=SPEARMAN TWOTAIL
NOSIG
/MISSING=PAIRWISE.
Resources Processor Time 00:00:00,00
Elapsed Time 00:00:00,00
Number of Cases Allowed
174762 casesa

a. Based on availability of workspace memory

Correlations

USIA Y1
Spearman's rho USIA Correlation Coefficient 1,000 ,096
Sig. (2-tailed) . ,424
N 72 72
Y1 Correlation Coefficient ,096 1,000
Sig. (2-tailed) ,424 .
N 72 72

NONPAR CORR
/VARIABLES=Y1 USIA
Page 2
/PRINT=SPEARMAN TWOTAIL NOSIG
/MISSING=PAIRWISE.

Nonparametric Correlations
Notes

Output Created 14-APR-2017 11:04:36


Comments
Input Active Dataset DataSet0
Filter <none>
Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data
File 72

Missing Value Handling Definition of Missing User-defined missing values are


treated as missing.
Cases Used Statistics for each pair of variables
are based on all the cases with valid
data for that pair.
Syntax NONPAR CORR
/VARIABLES=Y1 USIA
/PRINT=SPEARMAN TWOTAIL
NOSIG
/MISSING=PAIRWISE.
Resources Processor Time 00:00:00,02
Elapsed Time 00:00:00,02
Number of Cases Allowed
174762 casesa

a. Based on availability of workspace memory

Correlations

Y1 USIA
Spearman's rho Y1 Correlation Coefficient 1,000 ,096
Sig. (2-tailed) . ,424
N 72 72
USIA Correlation Coefficient ,096 1,000
Sig. (2-tailed) ,424 .
N 72 72

NONPAR CORR
/VARIABLES=USIA PENDIDIKAN MASAKERJA Y1 Y2 Y3
/PRINT=SPEARMAN TWOTAIL NOSIG
/MISSING=PAIRWISE.

Page 3
Nonparametric Correlations
Notes

Output Created 14-APR-2017 11:09:57


Comments
Input Active Dataset DataSet0
Filter <none>
Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data
File 72

Missing Value Handling Definition of Missing User-defined missing values are


treated as missing.
Cases Used Statistics for each pair of variables
are based on all the cases with valid
data for that pair.
Syntax NONPAR CORR
/VARIABLES=USIA PENDIDIKAN
MASAKERJA Y1 Y2 Y3
/PRINT=SPEARMAN TWOTAIL
NOSIG
/MISSING=PAIRWISE.
Resources Processor Time 00:00:00,02
Elapsed Time 00:00:00,02
Number of Cases Allowed
92521 casesa

a. Based on availability of workspace memory

Page 4
Correlations

USIA PENDIDIKAN MASAKERJA


Spearman's rho USIA Correlation Coefficient 1,000 -,062 ,208 ,096
Sig. (2-tailed) . ,602 ,079 ,424
N 72 72 72 72
PENDIDIKAN Correlation Coefficient -,062 1,000 -,059 -,132
Sig. (2-tailed) ,602 . ,622 ,268
N 72 72 72 72
MASAKERJA Correlation Coefficient ,208 -,059 1,000 ,052
Sig. (2-tailed) ,079 ,622 . ,662
N 72 72 72 72
Y1 Correlation Coefficient ,096 -,132 ,052 1,000
Sig. (2-tailed) ,424 ,268 ,662 .
N 72 72 72 72
Y2 Correlation Coefficient -,073 ,056 -,069 ,128
Sig. (2-tailed) ,540 ,638 ,563 ,284
N 72 72 72 72
*
Y3 Correlation Coefficient -,097 -,051 -,274 ,271*
Sig. (2-tailed) ,416 ,669 ,020 ,021
N 72 72 72 72

Correlations

Y1 Y2 Y3
Spearman's rho USIA Correlation Coefficient ,096 -,073 -,097
Sig. (2-tailed) ,424 ,540 ,416
N 72 72 72
PENDIDIKAN Correlation Coefficient -,132 ,056 -,051
Sig. (2-tailed) ,268 ,638 ,669
N 72 72 72
MASAKERJA Correlation Coefficient ,052 -,069 -,274*
Sig. (2-tailed) ,662 ,563 ,020
N 72 72 72
Y1 Correlation Coefficient 1,000 ,128 ,271*
Sig. (2-tailed) . ,284 ,021
N 72 72 72
Y2 Correlation Coefficient ,128 1,000 ,427**
Sig. (2-tailed) ,284 . ,000
N 72 72 72
* **
Y3 Correlation Coefficient ,271 ,427 1,000
Sig. (2-tailed) ,021 ,000 .
N 72 72 72

Page 5
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

CROSSTABS
/TABLES=JENISKELAMIN BY Y1 Y2 Y3
/FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES
/STATISTICS=CHISQ CC PHI RISK
/CELLS=COUNT EXPECTED ROW TOTAL
/COUNT ROUND CELL.

Crosstabs
Notes

Output Created 14-APR-2017 11:19:56


Comments
Input Active Dataset DataSet0
Filter <none>
Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data
File 72

Missing Value Handling Definition of Missing User-defined missing values are


treated as missing.
Cases Used Statistics for each table are based
on all the cases with valid data in the
specified range(s) for all variables in
each table.
Syntax CROSSTABS
/TABLES=JENISKELAMIN BY Y1
Y2 Y3
/FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES
/STATISTICS=CHISQ CC PHI
RISK
/CELLS=COUNT EXPECTED
ROW TOTAL...
Resources Processor Time 00:00:00,03
Elapsed Time 00:00:00,08
Dimensions Requested 2
Cells Available 174734

Page 6
Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
JENISKELAMIN * Y1 72 100,0% 0 0,0% 72 100,0%
JENISKELAMIN * Y2 72 100,0% 0 0,0% 72 100,0%
JENISKELAMIN * Y3 72 100,0% 0 0,0% 72 100,0%

JENISKELAMIN * Y1
Crosstab

Y1
2,5 3,0 3,5 4,0
JENISKELAMIN 1 Count 0 0 2 1 1
Expected Count ,2 ,2 1,2 2,3 ,8
% within JENISKELAMIN 0,0% 0,0% 40,0% 20,0% 20,0%
% of Total 0,0% 0,0% 2,8% 1,4% 1,4%
2 Count 3 3 15 32 11
Expected Count 2,8 2,8 15,8 30,7 11,2
% within JENISKELAMIN 4,5% 4,5% 22,4% 47,8% 16,4%
% of Total 4,2% 4,2% 20,8% 44,4% 15,3%
Total Count 3 3 17 33 12
Expected Count 3,0 3,0 17,0 33,0 12,0
% within JENISKELAMIN 4,2% 4,2% 23,6% 45,8% 16,7%
% of Total 4,2% 4,2% 23,6% 45,8% 16,7%

Crosstab

Y1
4,5 5,0 Total
JENISKELAMIN 1 Count 1 1 5
Expected Count ,8 ,3 5,0
% within JENISKELAMIN 20,0% 20,0% 100,0%
% of Total 1,4% 1,4% 6,9%
2 Count 11 3 67
Expected Count 11,2 3,7 67,0
% within JENISKELAMIN 16,4% 4,5% 100,0%
% of Total 15,3% 4,2% 93,1%
Total Count 12 4 72
Expected Count 12,0 4,0 72,0
% within JENISKELAMIN 16,7% 5,6% 100,0%
% of Total 16,7% 5,6% 100,0%

Page 7
Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-


Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 3,895a 5 ,565
Likelihood Ratio 3,656 5 ,600
Linear-by-Linear
Association ,625 1 ,429

N of Valid Cases 72
a. 9 cells (75,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,21.

Symmetric Measures

Value Approx. Sig.


Nominal by Nominal Phi ,233 ,565
Cramer's V ,233 ,565
Contingency Coefficient ,227 ,565
N of Valid Cases 72

Risk Estimate

Value
Odds Ratio for a
JENISKELAMIN (1 / 2)

a. Risk Estimate statistics cannot be computed. They are only computed for a 2*2 table without empty cells.

JENISKELAMIN * Y2

Page 8
Crosstab

Y2
2,8 3,0 3,3 3,5
JENISKELAMIN 1 Count 0 0 0 2 2
Expected Count ,3 ,6 ,5 1,6 1,0
% within JENISKELAMIN 0,0% 0,0% 0,0% 40,0% 40,0%
% of Total 0,0% 0,0% 0,0% 2,8% 2,8%
2 Count 4 9 7 21 13
Expected Count 3,7 8,4 6,5 21,4 14,0
% within JENISKELAMIN 6,0% 13,4% 10,4% 31,3% 19,4%
% of Total 5,6% 12,5% 9,7% 29,2% 18,1%
Total Count 4 9 7 23 15
Expected Count 4,0 9,0 7,0 23,0 15,0
% within JENISKELAMIN 5,6% 12,5% 9,7% 31,9% 20,8%
% of Total 5,6% 12,5% 9,7% 31,9% 20,8%

Crosstab

Y2
3,8 4,0 4,5 4,8
JENISKELAMIN 1 Count 2 1 0 0 5
Expected Count 1,0 ,6 ,2 ,1 5,0
% within JENISKELAMIN 40,0% 20,0% 0,0% 0,0% 100,0%
% of Total 2,8% 1,4% 0,0% 0,0% 6,9%
2 Count 13 8 3 2 67
Expected Count 14,0 8,4 2,8 1,9 67,0
% within JENISKELAMIN 19,4% 11,9% 4,5% 3,0% 100,0%
% of Total 18,1% 11,1% 4,2% 2,8% 93,1%
Total Count 15 9 3 2 72
Expected Count 15,0 9,0 3,0 2,0 72,0
% within JENISKELAMIN 20,8% 12,5% 4,2% 2,8% 100,0%
% of Total 20,8% 12,5% 4,2% 2,8% 100,0%

Page 9
Crosstab

Total
JENISKELAMIN 1 Count 5
Expected Count 5,0
% within JENISKELAMIN 100,0%
% of Total 6,9%
2 Count 67
Expected Count 67,0
% within JENISKELAMIN 100,0%
% of Total 93,1%
Total Count 72
Expected Count 72,0
% within JENISKELAMIN 100,0%
% of Total 100,0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-


Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 3,164a 7 ,869
Likelihood Ratio 4,667 7 ,700
Linear-by-Linear
Association ,520 1 ,471

N of Valid Cases 72
a. 11 cells (68,8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,14.

Symmetric Measures

Value Approx. Sig.


Nominal by Nominal Phi ,210 ,869
Cramer's V ,210 ,869
Contingency Coefficient ,205 ,869
N of Valid Cases 72

Risk Estimate

Value
Odds Ratio for a
JENISKELAMIN (1 / 2)

a. Risk Estimate statistics cannot be computed. They are only computed for a 2*2 table without empty cells.

JENISKELAMIN * Y3
Page 10
Crosstab

Y3
2,7 3,0 3,3 3,7
JENISKELAMIN 1 Count 0 1 1 0 1
Expected Count ,3 ,8 1,3 1,1 1,2
% within JENISKELAMIN 0,0% 20,0% 20,0% 0,0% 20,0%
% of Total 0,0% 1,4% 1,4% 0,0% 1,4%
2 Count 5 10 18 16 16
Expected Count 4,7 10,2 17,7 14,9 15,8
% within JENISKELAMIN 7,5% 14,9% 26,9% 23,9% 23,9%
% of Total 6,9% 13,9% 25,0% 22,2% 22,2%
Total Count 5 11 19 16 17
Expected Count 5,0 11,0 19,0 16,0 17,0
% within JENISKELAMIN 6,9% 15,3% 26,4% 22,2% 23,6%
% of Total 6,9% 15,3% 26,4% 22,2% 23,6%

Crosstab

Y3
4,0 4,3 5,0 Total
JENISKELAMIN 1 Count 1 2 0 5
Expected Count 1,2 ,2 ,1 5,0
% within JENISKELAMIN 20,0% 40,0% 0,0% 100,0%
% of Total 1,4% 2,8% 0,0% 6,9%
2 Count 16 1 1 67
Expected Count 15,8 2,8 ,9 67,0
% within JENISKELAMIN 23,9% 1,5% 1,5% 100,0%
% of Total 22,2% 1,4% 1,4% 93,1%
Total Count 17 3 1 72
Expected Count 17,0 3,0 1,0 72,0
% within JENISKELAMIN 23,6% 4,2% 1,4% 100,0%
% of Total 23,6% 4,2% 1,4% 100,0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-


Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 18,391a 6 ,005
Likelihood Ratio 10,354 6 ,111
Linear-by-Linear
Association 1,495 1 ,221

N of Valid Cases 72
a. 10 cells (71,4%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,07.

Page 11
Symmetric Measures

Value Approx. Sig.


Nominal by Nominal Phi ,505 ,005
Cramer's V ,505 ,005
Contingency Coefficient ,451 ,005
N of Valid Cases 72

Risk Estimate

Value
Odds Ratio for a
JENISKELAMIN (1 / 2)

a. Risk Estimate statistics cannot be computed. They are only computed for a 2*2 table without empty cells.

Page 12

You might also like