33

( 35 5 )

Measurement of the Wave Height Produced by

Forced Heaving of the Cylinders

By Fukuzo Tasai, Member

Abstract
We measured the two dimensional progressive wave height produced by forced heaving of the
miscellaneous cylinders, and compared the amplitude ratio A with the F. Ursell's results [1] and
author's theoretical calculations [2]. As the result we could find that the measured A showed ge-
nerally fair coincidence wih that of the theoretical results. Moreover, the author studied the wedge
effect, the effect of the deviation from the Lewis forms, and the effect of the heaving amplitude.
Many figures in this paper shows these results.

1.

heaving pitching strip method , sectional

damping force , ,

,heaving s
, A=/s ,

,= ,g=
= heaving ,N= /heaving , , AF. Ursell [1]

,Lewis forms [2], ,

, ,
,

[2] Lewis form wall-sidd ,

non-wallsided non-wall sided , ,

N, , Lewis form
,[2] , Lewis form , A

, heaving ,
2 , , H, Holstein [3]
heaving , 2
5mm (LBD= 3.00m 0.7m 0.5m)

, standing wave ,
, ,
,plunger , ,

35 1 7
*
 34
107

2.

(LBD=60m 1.5m 1.5m)

21

Fig.1 Fig.2

(a) , M, E

R ,plunger P 70 mm

Fig,3 , 150 mm

, 1mm ,Fig.9 (a),

(b), (c), (d) (el), (e2)

,plunger type

22
(a ) Fig. 1 L2

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3 ( )
 35

, , 1

, plunger , groupwave
, ,

,Plunger
,plunger group velocity

L1 4250 ( 1 )
m 3 plunger

1
T= Plunqer
L1 , 5 t1, tz=Plunger

% L2

2.3

, 2 1float Fig.4 (b)

float (15cm 2cm 2cm) frame work ,float

F R RI P

(2,5/100mm) G springs1 ,wire 2

float , 0.255 wave

frequency , float P

, ,P1F

,Fig.16 , r , (c1), (c2), (c3)

, A(corrected) Y 2 , (d)

,Scale (200cm 30cm) 10cln

nega filmprolector , vertical scale

,Fig.5 ,float 2
3% ,float , , check

Fig.1 , plunger 15m ,

standingwave

( b ) Fig. 4

3.

[2] ,A=/s 0=2/gB/2 8/2 ,

15cm (1.3m), float 02.5

, 4 12 5mm 35mm

, , plunger

,timemark plungerperiod mark

36
107

(c1)

(c2 )

(c3 )

( d )

(e1 ) (e2 )
 37

,
plunger
,

10 ,

repro-
ducibility

4.

0.4m
3.5m , (c), (d)
, ,

Fig. 5

41

Fig. 6 (a)
, Ursell

, 0
A T=

9.3cm, B/2= 13.85cm B/2T= H0= 1.5,

=0.722 Fig, 6 (b)

[2]Fig.7

,
Grim [4]bild (7)

Fig.6 (a )

Fig.6 (b) Fig.6 (c)

01.0 ,01.0

, ,0 Ahump, hollow , 0,

Fig. 6(c), H0= 2.0, =0.697 Grim [4]

exact value ,0 ,A

, Ursell ,

,Wavy , , hump. hollow 0

 38
107

segmental section ,[2]

42

=60, 90, 120, H0= 0.5774, 1.0, 1.7323

0.5 , Fig.7

(a), 7(b), 7(c) ;6 90

,0 ,wavy

,Plunger A

,wall -sided

(/2-/2)

wali- sidedLewis form

wedge effect .4

, [2] ,

4
Fig.7 (a ) (1 ) steepness ,

(2 ) Plunger

(3 ) wedge effect

(4 ) H0, ,Lewis form

Fig.7 (b ) Fig.7 (c)

steepness =2/ A 02S/

B ,=90 , 0.075 =60,90 ,
[2] A,

,(1), (2), (3), (4) =1200 ,6(c) ,[2]

00.3 , ,0 10%

15% wedge effect,0 , ,0

wedgeeffect, H0, [2]

43
B
/2= 150 mm, =46mm ,H0;1,0, 1.25, 1.5 2.0
4 0.98, 0.975, 0.97 0.96 0

1/2 (B/2= 75mm)

 39

wall-sided Fig.8(a), 8(b), 8(c) 8(d) B1, B2 ,

[2] ,0 ,

3 ,00.5510% B2, B3 ,hump, hollow

H.Holstein[ , , hump hollow

.84 01.85 hump H0= 2.0Lewis

form A, K4 [

Fgi. 8 (a) Fig. 8 (c)

Fig. 8 (b) Fig. 8 (d)

44 A

midship Fig.9 (a) A1

,A2 3

,A1 A1-W1, A1-W2, A2 A2-W1, A2-W2 W1 .A1, A2

H0=1.0, W2 H0= 1.25 non-wallsided ,A1- W1,

2-W1 600 ,=60 A1-W1, A2-

W1wedge effect Fig. 10 (a), 10 (b) 0 1.0A

,Plunger ,hump, hollw 0

[2] ,A1-W1 , ,A2-W1 01.0

1020% A2 A1

[2] A A2 01.0

A2-W1 ,A-W1 Lewis form , feine full

0 , A

, A2-W1 ,

Lewisform ,01.0 H0= 1.25A1 -

 40
107

Fig.9 (a )

Fig.9 (c)

Fi8. 9 (b ) Fig.9 (d)

Fig. 10 (b)
Fig. 10 (a)

W2, A2-%Fig. 10 (c), 10 (d)

A1-W2Lewis form

,0 1.2

A2-% , ,

Fig. 10 (d),

, report [8]

45 C

(Fig. 9 (b) )C1 Fig. 10 (c )

 41

C2 W1, W22 C1- W1, C2-W1 H0=2/3 =0.3933, 0.4893

G C1-W2, C2-W2 H0=0.5830 0.3988,

0.5690 , C2-W2

Fig. 11 (d) Fig11 (a), (b), (c)[8]

4 45

,=90

,wedge effect

, Wavy ,

pitchin
, 2s=70mm ,

,A
Fig. 11

46 D

K. Kroukovsky [5], ,strip method,pitch, heave

yacht 1699B, 1699D , ,

, heave pitch

fine , Grim [4] Grim [4]fine

[2] yachtmidship section

D A Fig9(C) P2D1 ,

full "1 ,D1-W1, D2-W1 H0=1.0 =0.4773, 0.5618

Fig.12 (a), (b) 00.8 [2] ,0 0 .8

, D2-W1 01.8 hump Grim [4]

Abb. 10 Fig .12 (b) , D1-W1

0 8,

80 wedge effect Lewis form

,D1-W1, D2-W1 , full, fine a2-W1

0 , A ,

0 , ,

,Fig.9(c) ,

D1- W1H 0 = 1.25, 0.6

D2- W1H0 = 1.25, 0.7

H0, [2] AFig. 12 (a), (b)

Fig. 12 (a ) Fig. 12 (b )
 42
107

D1-W2Fig. 12 (c) ,

0= 0.413%, 0.7

16%, 1020% 0 ,A

Fig.9 (d) ,

ne fullLewis form

, , 0

wedge effect

26 =128 =

120 Wedge Effect

, 0

D2 -W2D2 - W1 Lewis
Fig.12 (c) form ,01.0 ,

([8] )A2-W1, D1-W1,

Lewis form ,[2]( 4)
,

Lewis form [2]

, wedge effect correction

,Fig13
Fig. 13

6.

020
(1) Lewis form ,F.
UseU [2]

(2 ) A , hump, hollow , 0 ,hump, hollow

(3 ) Plunger A ,0 ,hump, hollow

(4) ,=90 45 wedge effect

,[ =120, D1-W1 V wedgeeffect

(5 ) wedge effect , H0 [2] ,0

(6 ) H0 ,Lewis form 0 ,[2]

A fine fulI 2]
,

(7) 0 ,wedge effectLewis form

(8 ) Lewis form plunger type [2]
,

,
, , ,
 43

1. F. Ursell Quart. J. Mech. App!. Math (1949, p. 18)

2. F. Tasai Journal of S. N. A. J. Vol. 105 (1959)
3. H. Holstein W. R. H. Dec. (1936) s. 385-389
4. O. Grim J. S. T. G (1953)
5. K. Kroukovsky S. N. A. M. E (1957)
6. F. M. Lewis S. N. A. M. E (1929)
7. , ,No. 9 (1954)
8. F. Tasai Report of Research Institute for Applied Mechanics No. 28

I float
1. float

Float ,2 fig. 14Float , x, y

,z W-Wx
2 float ,
T, z l m

,y0
(1)
= ,k0= 2/g
Fig. 14
=1cm , 40cm
,/ 0.025 (1)x=0

y = heaving V0= float

A= float = 2al

= =S/2T, H0= /T

S= float

M0=float heaving

m'= P1 (Fig. 4) ,M= M0+m'

M = float ,0= =M / V0

0= floatheaving parameter= 2/g

N= ,Fy=

ks= s1 (Fig. 4)

E=

,float

(2 )

AE

(3)

(2), (3) E ,M0+m'=M

(4)

(4) y , E02g wire E

 44
107

(5)
Fy N

(6)

(7)

=02
, =2h, M= V00 0 (5)

(8)

float y=bcos (t- ) (9)

,

(10)

(8)

(11)

Y=b/m

(12)

ks gA ,fA

(13)
phase lag

(14)

, ,(5) E

E0+ m' +ks. y0

(15)

2. float
float , 1cycle ,2cycle ,

Tn 002 =
gA+ks
0[2]
M+ V0 0

(16)

floatsection ,F. M . Lewis [6] Co1.4 V0= 25.4cm3, T =0 .86cm, =

0.98, H0=1.16, =1cm

(17)
 45

frame D1, D2 ,floatheaving equivalent mass :

m' (M0+m') g=Mg 27gr ks= 0.2gr/ cm, l=15 cm

0=02/g

(18)

0K4

free heaving2cycle

,[2]
,K4 0 [2]
K4-0 (18) Fig. 15
n=0.633, K4=
0.625 n=24.9, Tn= 0.252

2 ,[2
n
Fig 1.5
floatTn

0.2500.260
3. Y

yfloat (0, , l,
,T, V0, M, etc) (10), (12), (13)

2 Y Fig.16 y Z=1/Y
2 [7] 0 0 0=
n=const ,fAn ,

= x=0 ,float

Xm , X

(19)
m=20mmXm max1 mm

m' d2y/ dt2+ ksy E0= 2gr ,

( 2 )

Fig. 16

[II] Lewis A, K4

heaving, pitching strip method

,[2] H0=2.0Lewis form A, K4 Fig.17 Fig. 18

[2]Fig.5 3=- 0.1 A= 0.9404

46
107

Fig. 17 Fig. 18