Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Michmizosk Localfieldpotentials PDF
Michmizosk Localfieldpotentials PDF
/ &
, 2011
.
/ &
: . ()
5 2011
...
Copyright . , 2011.
, ,
, . ,
,
,
.
.
.
,
&
. ,
.
,
,
.
, . ,
,
. , ,
, ,
. , ,
, ,
.
,
. ,
, .
.
, , , ,
. ,
. , ,
,
-
-.
.
, ,
. , , , ,
,
,
,
.
, , , ,
, ,
,
.
, .
,
.
.
.
, , .
11 2011
, .
.
,
.
,
, .
Parkinson
()
. ,
. ,
Hammerstein-Wiener (H-W), Izhikevich ,
, , ,
.
,
,
(),
.
,
.
,
.
-
.
.
. ,
Izhikevich ,
H-W.
Parkinson.
, , , -
, , ,
Abstract
The basal ganglia are a collection of interconnected subcortical nuclei which have been
implicated in motor, cognitive and limbic functions. The subthalamic nucleus (STN) is the
sole excitatory structure within the basal ganglia. Given its central position influencing
many basal ganglia nuclei, it is likely to play an important role in the processing that is
performed by the basal ganglia.
In order to explore the multiple facets of processing that may be occurring, models are
designed and verified to capture aspects of the STN neural activity such as the timing of
each spike, the spiking rhythm and the interspike intervals, among others. Through the
integration of the results obtained from the models, a coherent view of the processing of
the STN is modeled. The models are able to simulate all aspects of a subthalamic nucleus
cell spike activity, ranging from the presence of a single spike to the onsets and offsets of
pulses of spikes, believed to act as the braking mechanism on the basal ganglia target
nuclei.
The models then act as the test bed for verifying the various hypotheses been proposed for
the effect of DBS on the cellular level. Two novel approaches are presented. The first one
introduces the DBS pulse in the Izhikevich model and the second simulates the attenuation
of the beta band of the LFPs that drive the H-W models. Simulation results allow the
adoption of the current hypothesis that DBS masks the pathological firing by altering the
firing pattern of STN neurons, believed to characterize PD.
Key Words
Local field potentials, neural activity, deep brain stimulation, nonlinear modeling,
mathematical modeling, subthalamic nucleus, motion
D1 : -1
D2 : -2
STR : striatum ( )
1 ....................................................................................................................................... 15
.......................................................................................................................................... 15
2 ....................................................................................................................................... 19
19
2.1 ..................................................................................................................... 19
2.1.1 ........................................................................................................ 20
2.1.2 ............................................................................... 21
2.2 ...................................................................................... 23
1
2.2.1 ......................................................................................... 23
2.2.2 ............................................................ 24
2.2.3 ......................................................................................................... 25
2.2.4 .............................................................................................. 26
2.2.5 .................................................................................................. 29
2.3 ....................................................................................... 30
2.3.1 .................................................................................... 31
2.3.2 ........................................................................................ 32
2.4 ...................................................................................................................... 34
3 ....................................................................................................................................... 35
....................................................................... 35
3.1 .............................................................................. 35
3.1.1 ................................................................................................................ 35
3.1.2 .................................................................................................. 38
3.2 .................................................................... 40
3.3 ............. 41
3.3.1 ....................................................... 41
3.3.2 - ............................................. 42
3.3.3 ............................. 44
3.3.4 ......................................... 46
3.3.5 .............................................................................................................................. 46
3.4 ...................................................................... 46
3.5 ...................................................................................................................... 48
4 ....................................................................................................................................... 51
.............. 51
4.1 ................................................................................................ 51
4.2 ........................................................... 59
4.3 ...................................................................................................................... 64
5 ....................................................................................................................................... 65
Parkinson............................................................... 65
5.1 Parkinson .................. 66
5.2 .................................. 67
5.3 .......................................................................................... 69
5.3.1 ........................................................................................... 69
5.3.2 .................................................................................... 73
5.4.1 .......................................................................................... 76
5.4.2 .................................................................................................. 76
5.4.3 ........................................................................... 77
5.4.4 .............................................. 79
5.4.5 ................................................................................. 80
5.5 .......................... 81
5.6 ............................................ 82
5.7 ...... 84
5.7 ...................................................................................................................... 86
6 ....................................................................................................................................... 91
3
.................................................................................................................... 91
6.1 ................................................................................ 91
6.1.1 .... 92
6.1.2 ..................................... 95
6.1.3 .......................................................... 96
6.2 ............................................................................. 97
6.2.1 .......................................................... 97
6.2.2 .................................................................................................. 99
6.2.3 ...................................................................................................... 101
7 ..................................................................................................................................... 111
-
........................................................................................................ 111
8 ..................................................................................................................................... 139
4
Izhikevich
........................................................................................... 139
8.1.1 O a,b,c, d
................................................................................................................................... 140
9 ..................................................................................................................................... 151
........................................................................................................ 151
9.1
....................................................................................................................................................... 151
10 ................................................................................................................................... 159
-
Izhikevich .................................................................................................................... 159
10.2 Izhikevich
......................................................................................................................................... 160
10.3 - H-W
....................................................................................................................................................... 164
11 ................................................................................................................................... 171
.................................. 171
1.1 ( )
( )
.
16
2.1 .
5,000 10,000 .
,
, .
. : ,
( ) ............................................................................... 22
2.2 .............................................................................................. 25
2.3 ............................................................................................... 26 7
2.4
- ......................................................................................................... 28
2.5 ........................................ 29
2.6 ................................. 30
2.7 ...................................................................... 31
2.8 ( [2]) . 33
3.2 ............................................................................. 37
3.3
............................................................................................................................................ 38
3.4 ................................................... 39
3.5 ........................................... 40
3.6 - ................................................... 43
3.7 -
....................................................................................................................................... 44
3.8 - ......... 45
3.9
.
. ,
, - (GABA), ,
.
................................................................................... 47
4.3 , , ........................................................... 58
4.4
.......................................................................................................................................... 60
8 4.5 5 Hz,
Otsuka, .................................................... 61
4.8 3 Hz
Terman and Rubin, ................................ 64
5.1 Parkinson .
............................................................................................ 67
5.2
Parkinson ....................................................................................... 68
5.3 DBS
Parkinson .................................................................... 70
6.1 Ben Gun ......................................................................................................... 98
6.2
.......................................................................................................................................................... 100
6.5
. (s)
.
. ....................... 107
7.2
. () ( ) ( 9
) 4.1 ms .......................................... 114
7.4 ()
. ,
.
.
. () ,
,
. ............................... 117
7.5 1.
- ,
- ............................ 122
7.6 2.
- ,
- ............................ 123
7.7 1.
- ,
- ............................ 124
7.8 . 3,
STN, lateral, 1.5 (D75min15) ()
.
. () 90 ms .
. () 90 ms
. () () -
, , -
. () .
()
()
...................................................................................................................................... 126
7.9 ()
()
() ()
. () .
. .............................................................................. 128
10
7.10 . 3,
STN, posterior, 1.5 mm () ()
- () -() ()
()
() () - ()
1 ..................................................................................................... 129
7.12 ()
() .
() ,
. ....................................................................................................................................... 132
7.13 () 1,
STN, , 1.0 mm (S1-D75plus10). ()
() 3 db ()
3 db .......................................................................................... 133
7.14
. () 8 , 1,
STN, 0.02 s, () 11 , 1, STN,
0.1 s, () 8 , 2, STN, 0.2 s. ................. 134
8.1 Izhikevich
a, b, c, d 4. ............................................. 143
8.2
................................................................................................................. 144
8.3
145
8.4 ( S3-
D75min15) : () Izhikevich
() : () . ,
50 ms, .
. () . 45
95% () ,
Gauss. .............. 147
8.5 .
, ,
. ........... 148
11
9.1
. ()
, () , () .................... 152
9.2 .
....................................................................................................................... 153
9.3 .
() () . ()-() . ()
........................................................................ 154
9.4 .
() () . ()-()
. () . ............................................. 155
9.5 .
() () . ()-()
. () .................... 157
10.1 ( ) ()
Izhikevich (). (
) (), () (). ................................... 160
10.2 ( ) ()
Izhikevich
(). ( ) (), () (). .......... 161
10.3 () , () ,
() .
.
( 10.1)
( 10.2) .................................................................................................................. 163
10.4 ON DBS
. (A) ()
,
Izhikevich. () (
) ON DBS
( ) FF DBS , () ,
........................................................................................................................... 164
10.5 ON DBS
-W. 1 (S1-D72plus0) ( )
12 ( ) OFF DBS (
) ON DBS (
). .................................................................................................. 166
10.6 ON DBS
-W. 1 (S1-D75min05) ( )
( ) OFF DBS (
) ON DBS (
). .................................................................................................. 167
1 ..................................... 118
3 H-W .
.......................................................................................................... 120
4 a, b, c d
Izhikevich [1].............................................................. 142
5 Izhikevich
S3-D75min15 ... 149
13
14
E
,
1.1. ,
.
,
1.1. ,
.
, , ,
. 15
,
.
, , ,
, .
1.1.
.
1.1 ( )
( )
.
.
.
, ,
16 ,
, . ,
,
,
.
,
,
.
Parkinson
, , ,
. ,
,
- ,
Izhikevich .
,
, ,
Parkinson.
, , ,
.
Parkinson.
,
.
.
.
Parkinson
.
17
.
- , Hammerstein-Wiener,
. Izhikevich
.
,
.
Parkinson .
.
1
18
,
. , ,
,
.
.
,
,
,
.
19
2.1
,
: (1)
(), , (2)
(),
,
.
, .
.
,
.
, 2.2.5,
.
2
2.1.1
,
.
:
, , .
. , :
) ,
.
,
) , .
( )
. 400,000
[1],
) , ,
.
m 1 m
. ,
,
20 .
.
, ,
. ,
.
,
[1].
.
. ,
.
, .
()
. ,
. Ranvier
.
,
.
. ,
.
,
, . ,
, ,
,
20 30 nm [1].
,
.
2.1.
. ,
, (
)
.
[2]. ,
, , , , , -
(GABA).
. ,
, . 21
2.1.2
: ,
.
.
, , .
.
, 10
200,000 [1]. ,
.
,
, ,
.
22
2.1 .
5,000 10,000 .
, ,
. .
: , ( )
2
. ,
.
,
(
,
.)
.
.
, .
. ,
(
)
. ,
, .
,
(.)
2.2
23
2.2.1
.
,
.
, .
(
, )
. ,
,
,
.
,
mV V.
2
2.2.2
( 2.2) ,
.
,
,
.
: () (-),
() (- ).
[3]. -
( ) (
) .
- ,
(- ),
- (- ),
(- ).
,
.
-
, - ( K+-Na+). ,
( - )
24 Na+ K+
. , , Na+
, + ,
( Cl-)
.
,
( )
.
-100 mV -5 mV, . ,
-90 mV -40 mV.
: (1)
(2)
,
.
,
.
2.2
. 25
( )
. ,
.
.
.
, , 2.2.4.
2.2.3
( )
,
, ,
(). -50 mV,
,
. ,
+30 mV ()
2
2.3
,
( 2.3). ,
,
1-100 m/s,
26
.
.
,
,
. .
.
,
, ,
.
2.2.4
: . ,
-
.
1
, .
1
.
.
.
()
(
). , ,
.
2.4 .
, ,
.
,
-,
.
.
. ,
. 27
, ,
( 2.4).
,
.
[1]. , ,
,
.
,
( )
.
.
, G,
. ,
2
2.4
.
,
0.2 s
28
[1].
.
,
( 2.5),
.
,
.
(E) (excitatory postsynaptic potential EPSP.)
,
( 2.5)
() (inhibitory postsynaptic potential IPSP).
,
. ,
.
,
.
.
,
(post synaptic potential PSP)
.
2.2.5
,
. ,
0.5 mV, 15 mV
( 2.6-).
,
.
,
. ,
,
.
29
.
, ,
(-) ( 2.6)
2.5
2
, ,
.
2.3
.
, ,
2.7. ,
(), ,
(), , .
, , , ...
30
2.6
() ()
()
2.7
( milieu intrieur).
, , ,
, , ,
.. (
, ,
).
31
,
, . ,
( ), ,
, [1].
2.3.1
. ,
( ),
( ).
, , , .
( )
, .
12 ( ),
, , , 31 (8 , 12
, 5 , 5 1 ), [2].
2
, .
, ,
.
2.3.2
( : , ).
, ,
2.8.
:
:
, , .
,
,
. ,
,
( ).
,
.
, .
32 .
( ,
) .
:
,
, .
:
.
:
,
.
:
( ).
.
33
2.8
( [2])
:
: () ,
, .
, , ,
. () ,
. ,
, .
: .
, (
) :
( ),
.
2
: , , .
,
. .
, ,
,
.
, :
( , ),
( ).
,
.
. (
) ,
. ,
,
( ). ,
" ".
.
2.4
34
[1] Widmaier EP, Raff H., Strang KT (eds.) (2006) Vanders Human Physiology The
mechanisms of Body Function 10th edition, McGraw Hill: New York
[2] Kandel ER, Schwartz JH, Jessell TM (eds.) (1996) Essentials of Neural Science and
Behavior 1st edition, Appleton & Lange
[3] Alberts B, Bray D, Hopkin K, Johnson A, Lewis J, Raff M, Roberts K, Walter P (2003)
Essential Cell Biology 2nd edition, Garland Science
3.1
3.1.1
,
,
, 2. ,
,
.
. ,
,
Parkinson [1]. , 35
,
.
.
,
.
, Parkinson, Huntington, ,
, ..
[2],
: () (caudate nucleus), ()
(putamen), () (globus palidus -GP), ()
(subthalamic nucleus STN) () (substantia nigra SN).
, ,
3.1.
2
,
.
3
,
.
(striatum STR).
.
D1 (: D2), D1-
(: D2-) [3].
(ventral striatum) (nucleus accumbens),
.
36
3.1 () & ()
.
.
,
. [4]: ,
.
.
3.3.
3.3
.
,
.
[5] ,
.
( 3.4).
37
( ).
. ,
.
.
( 60-70%) Parkinson.
()
3.2
3
38 3.3
.
,
, ,
. ,
, , .
3.1.2
(, , )
, [6].
, , ,
, (zona incerta) .
, .
3 x 5 x 12 mm
560.000 [7].
39
3.4
3
(projection neuron) [8].
,
,
. ,
(
).
[6].
,
,
( 3.5). K .
.
, GABA .
3.2
3.1, ,
.
, .
40
3.5
[9]: () (
, , ,
), ()
- ,
.
, , ,
.
: ,
3.3.1. ,
,
,
[10].
: ,
[11].
:
,
[12].
41
: .
[13].
3.3
,
.
3.3.1
1980 [14], (
) (GPi & SNr) .
( 2.6). -,
, .
3
GABA
.
. ,
.
:
D1-
. (
SNc D1-)
,
.
. ,
- ( 3.6).
: D2-
. ,
,
.
SNc D2-. ,
.
, ,
42 . ,
-
( 3.6).
3.3.2 -
,
- ,
([15], [16]).
, (
3.7). , ,
, .
,
,
, , ([17], [18]).
43
3.6 -
, ,
(
) ([18], [19]).
[20].
, ,
,
.
, , -
(pedunculopontine nucleusPPN)
[21] (
3.8).
3
44
3.7 -
3.3.3
([15], [16])
,
: ,
, .
45
3.8 -
. ,
, - . ,
.
3
3.3.4
, -
.
,
.
-1 (D1),
. .
, ,
-2 (D2). ,
.
,
: - ,
, .
--
.
3.3.5
.
,
46
.
.
(GPi, SNr)
,
.
3.9
.
-GABA .
.
3.4
[22]: ,
. ,
3.9
47
.
. ,
, - (GABA),
, .
, , , ,
. ,
,
. ,
[22]. Huntington -
[23].
.
, -
[22].
.
3
.
. ,
Parkinson [24]. ,
, [22].
. , Parkinson
-
[25].
50% - 85% [25].
.
[24]. ,
Parkinson, ,
[24].
[24].
, ,
,
[22]. ,
[26].
48
3.5
50
.
.
.
4.1
4.1.1 Hodgkin-Huxley
Hodgkin-Huxley
51
.
Hodgkin Huxley 1952
[1], Nobel 1963.
.
, Hodgkin
Huxley
, .
Na+ K+,
. ,
: Na+ K+
.
,
. ,
4
,
.
,
, 0
1. ( ),
0.5 ( 50%),
, . ,
.
dV
C m dt = g L (V V L ) g Na m h(V V Na ) g K n (V V K )
3 4
dm
= a m (1 m) bm m
dt
dh (4.1)
= a h (1 h) b h h
dt
dn
dt = a n (1 n) bn n
52 t
V : m (
Na+), h ( Na+) n ( +).
a b (
)
,
Hodgkin Huxley [a = a(V) b = b(V)]. : gNa
gK ( Na+ + ), gL (
), VNa VK ( Na+ + ), VL (
) Cm ( ).
4.1.
Hodgkin-Huxley ,
. ,
,
. ,
Na+ +, Cl- Ca++.
4.1 Hodgkin-Huxley
,
.
Hodgkin-Huxley :
.
(FLOPS), Hodgkin-Huxley
1200 FLOPS 1 ms [2].
53
.
, , ,
.
,
, .
, , ,
,
.
, (
) ( ).
4.1.2
dV (t )
I (t ) = Cm (4.2)
dt
Cm .
,
, .
3
(firing time) tf, :
lim V (t ) = Vr .
t ( t f ) (4.4)
4.1.3
.
,
(leaky integrate and fire model). ,
, Rm,
. Rm
54 :
V (t ) dV (t )
I (t ) =
Cm (4.5)
Rm dt
m = RmCm :
dV (t )
m =
V (t ) + Rm I (t ). (4.6)
dt
,
. , ,
Vr < , .
4.2.
, (
3
,
, .
7 9.
4.2 &
)
,
, ..
4.1.4 &
& , 55
.
.
, abs,
.
.
,
(
).
,
.
,
& , ,
. - &
, :
4
dV
= F (V ) + I G (V ) (4.7)
dt
F(V) G(V)
.
4.1.5
SRM, i ui
. ,
urest = 0.
ui
. i
t ilast , ,
56
:
ui (t ) = (t tilast ) + wij ij (t tilast , s ) + (t tilast , s ) I ext (t s )ds (4.8)
j f 0
f
, t j i j
, s = t t j , wij ()
f
i j, Iext i.
j
t j < t j .
f
i: (t tilast ) . ,
(response kernels) .
= ij (t tilast , s)
f
i j t j .
t tilast
. , (
) .
ui, , , .
,
( ): = (t tilast ) .
(t ti
last
)
,
. , (t tilast , s)
Iext
t t ilast , . 4.3
.
SRM, ,
& .
Hodgkin-Huxley, [3].
,
,
.
4.1.6 Fitzhugh-Nagumo 57
Fitzhugh 1961 [4]
Nagumo [6].
Hodgkin-Huxley,
. , V(t),
:
dV
dt = a + bV + cV + dV w
2 3
dw (4.9)
= (eV w)
dt
w .
. Fitzhugh-Nagumo
(72 FLOPS),
.
4
4.3 , ,
4.1.7 Hindmarsh-Rose
Hindmarsh-Rose
[7].
,
dV
dt = u F (V ) + I w
du (4.10)
= G (V ) u
dt
dw = H (V ) w
58 dt
F, G, H , ,
. H V(t)
, u(t) (spiking
variable) + +,
w(t) (bursting variable)
.
,
120 FLOPS, .
4.1.8 Morris-Lecar
Ca++
+:
dV
C dt = I g L (V VL ) gCa m (V )(V VCa ) g K n(V VK )
dn (4.11)
= (V )(n (V ) n)
dt
1 V V1
m (=
V) 1 + tanh
2 V2
1 V V3
=
n 1 + tanh (4.12)
2 V4
V V3
(V )= cosh
2V4
[8].
4.1.9 Izhikevich
Izhikevich 8 .
,
.
. 59
(13 FLOPS).
4.4
[2],
. Izhikevich
.
4.2
,
. , Otsuka Terman and
Rubin , Hodgkin-Huxley (
).
4
4.4
4.2.1 Otsuka
Otsuka
plateau [9]. -
plateau
. , V
:
60
dV
Cm = I Na I K I A IT I L I Ca K I leak (4.13)
dt
Cm ,
4,
I Na = g Na m 3 h(V V Na ) : Na+, m
h.
I K = g K n 4 (V V K ) : +,
n.
I A = g A a 2 b(V V K ) : + -,
b.
=
IT gT p 2 q(V VCa ) : Ca++ -,
p q.
4
g
4.5 5 Hz,
Otsuka,
=
I L g L c 2 d1 d 2 (V VCa ) : Ca++ -L,
c, -- d1 Ca++-
d2.
=
I Ca K gCa K r 2 (V sVK ) : Ca++- +, Ca++-
r.
=
I leak gleak (V Vleak ) :
[9].
,
61
5 Hz ( 4.5).
,
in vitro . Otsuka
plateau . ,
( -
), plateau (
4.6). ,
,
. -
4.7 Otsuka
plateau, ,
.,
, ,
( 4.7).
, Otsuka
. ,
plateau
. ,
.
dV
Cm = I Na I K I Ca I T I AHP I leak (4.14)
dt
Cm ,
( g
):
=
I Na g Na m3 h(V VNa ) : Na+,
m h.
=I K g K n 4 (V VK ) : +,
n.
=
IT gT a3 b2 (V VCa ) : Ca++ -,
b.
IAPH: , Ca++- + .
,
3 Hz ( 4.8).
,
200 Hz.
, ,
( 4.9). Terman , ,
plateau
.
Heaviside, DBS
, iDBS
DBS .
10
,
4
4.8 3 Hz
Terman and Rubin,
Izhikevich 8.
4.3
[1] Hodgkin A, Huxley A (1952) A quantitative description of ion currents and its
applications to conduction and excitation in nerve membranes J. Physiol. (Lond.) 117
500-544
[2] Izhikevich E (2004) Which model to use for cortical spiking neurons? IEEE
Transactions on Neural Networks 15 1063-1070
[3] Gerstner W, Kistler W (2002) Spiking Neuron Models Cambridge, University Press
64 [4] Jolivet R, Timothy J, Gerstner W (2003) The Spike Response Model: A Framework to
Predict Neuronal Spike Trains Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2714, DOI:
10.1007/3-540-44989-2_101
[5] FitzHugh R (1961) Impulses and physiological states in theoretical models of nerve
membrane Biophysical J. 1 445-466
[6] Nagumo J, Arimoto S, Yoshizawa S (1962) An active pulse transmission line
simulating nerve axon Proc IRE 50 20612070
[7] Hindmarsh J, Rose R (1984) A model of neuronal bursting using three coupled first
order differential equations Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B 221 87102
[8] Morris C, Lecar H (1981) Voltage Oscillations in the barnacle giant muscle fiber
Biophys J. 35 193213
[9] Otsuka T, Abe T, Tsukagawa T, Song W (2004) Conductance-based model of the
voltage-dependent generation of a plateau potential in subthalamic neurons Journal of
Neurophysiology 2 255-264
[10] Terman D, Rubin J, Yew A, Wilson C (2002) Activity patterns in a model for
subthalamopallidal network of the basal ganglia Journal of Neuroscience 22 2963-2976
[11] Heida T, Marani E, Usunoff K (2008) The Subthalamic Nucleus Part II Modelling and
Simulation of Activity Advances in Anatomy, Embryology and Cell Biology 199 Springer
Verlag, London. ISBN 9783540794615
[12] Rubin J, Terman D (2004) High frequency stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus
eliminates pathological thalamic rhythmicity in a computer model Journal of
Computational Neuroscience 16 211-235
65
Parkinson
Parkinson
Parkinson ,
. ,
.
, ,
, [1].
( 60-70%),
,
.
Parkinson 4.500.000 .
1.000.000 Parkinson,
60.000-80.000 . 60
[1],
65
4-5 2040.
Parkinson
3.3
,
- .
5
5.1 Parkinson
, Parkinson
3.3,
. ,
. ,
. , ,
,
.
,
,
( 5.1).
,
.
.
,
66
[2]. ,
15 Hz [3]
Parkinson , 35 50 Hz [4].
, Parkinson
. :
( 5.2),
[4]. , ,
. [5]
,
: ()
()
. ,
.
Parkinson
5.1 Parkinson . 67
5.2
Leriche, 1912,
[6]. 1930,
ucy uchanan
.
Parkinson, , [7]. 1940,
Parkinson.
[8]
[9]. 1952,
5
5.2
Parkinson
68 Parkinson [10]. ,
( )
-
([11], [12]). 1963, lbe-
Fessard .
(Vim)
[13]. 1968
Parkinson. L-dopa
20 .
1992 , -
Parkinson,
[14].
[15]. ,
L-dopa, .
1990 , DeLong
[16]
.
Parkinson
,
.
5.3
.
() ( 5.3).
, .
,
, .
Parkinson,
. ,
.
.
. ,
. , 69
5.6. ,
() ,
-
.
5.3.1
, , .
,
.
. ,
.
.
5
70
5.3 DBS
Parkinson
Parkinson
Parkinson
,
.
15% .
CAPSIT-PD [17],
Parkinson ,
.
Parkinson
Parkinson plus
L-dopa .
, 12 15 [18].
(
, ,
). A [19],
,
[20]. ,
,
3
[21].
,
, .
DBS
. ,
, , ( off),
( on).
, 71
80%.
off ,
71% , 19% 1 ,
33% 5 [22]. ,
DBS,
,
,
.
L-dopa
off, L-dopa.
off ,
, 50/108 [18], on
20/108 [24]. ,
UPDRS L-dopa test
40% 70%. ,
off on . ,
L-dopa (.. off: 35/108,
on: 5/108, 86% )
L-dopa (.. off: 65/105, on: 35/105, 46%
). o DBS
off , on . UPDRS
30/108 off
on. 30/108 off
DBS, 30/108 on ,
[18].
(off on),
,
on.
72 DBS, ,
.
([18], [22],
[23]). L-dopa
.
.
,
([18]-
[23]). ,
.
L-dopa ,
DBS.
( ,
, ).
, L-
dopa,
DBS .
Parkinson
75
,
DBS 40 60 , 30
78. 70
74 ,
([23], [25]). Welter [25] ,
, >56 <56 .
follow-up 6 ,
UPDRS (Activities of Daily Living: ADL) (motor
examination) (71%),
(60%). Kleiner-Fisman [26],
. ADL, motor examination
UPDRS. ,
DBS.
, 75 .
DBS .
5.3.2
H 73
,
Parkinson plus , (MSA)
(PSP),
.
DBS .
,
MSA. MSA DBS
[27].
, L-dopa
STN GPi DBS Parkinson.
, MSA .
,
Parkinson DBS [22],
,
. DBS
PSP .
5
L- dopa,
() , DBS
.
Parkinson DBS. [23]
L-dopa
DBS.
L-dopa, , ,
DBS ([25], [28]).
DBS ([25], [29],
[30]). ,
, ([31],
[32]). 5 [22] ,
off, , ,
.
. , on
, 5 .
, L-dopa,
DBS, ,
,
STN Vim DBS.
74
/
. ,
DBS.
,
, ,
,
DBS
.
(.. [18]). ,
DBS ,
.
,
, ,
.
Parkinson
MRI
DBS
. DBS ,
MRI
,
,
(cross sign, penguin sign,
)
.
MRI,
[23].
,
. ,
,
.
,
. ,
[20].
75
.
[33]. ,
.
. ,
,
.
, , ,
. DBS
.
, 1% 25% ([20], [34], [35]),
- .
, , ,
,
.
5
5.4
Parkinson
5.4.1
12
.
off ,
,
. ,
.
(microelectrode recordings - MERs)
.
Parkinson: o (STN),
(Vim) (Gpi). H
-
. Vim
76 [24]. O STN Gpi
,
Parkinson, , , ,
off .
[24]. ,
STN
Parkinson [36]. STN
Gpi , ,
,
STN,
GPi ([37], [38]). H Gpi
.
5.4.2
DBS,
.
-
Parkinson
, ,
.
,
DBS Parkinson.
, -
.
, (CT)
(MRI).
, CT MRI. ,
[39].
.
. ,
,
.
. ,
Alterman [40]
Vim, .
.
77
,
,
.
.
,
.
.
,
5.4.3
-, ,
(.. ,
)
. :
1) 2)
.
5
.
,
()
. ,
,
, .. STN Gpi.
, , . ,
.
.
(.. )
1-3mm.
. 1 2,
. (Ben gun)
5
78 ( 4 2mm) 5
(Pollak [41] Bajjani
[42]).
.
,
DBS.
.
. -
.
, .
.
, ,
DBS.
Parkinson
, ,
.
.
5.4.4
,
.
. 4 ,
(1,5mm 0,5mm).
.
,
,
. STN,
,
. , Gpi,
Parkinson,
.
: 60-90msec 130Hz.
79
.
4 V
.
. ,
, ( )
( ), ( ,
/), .
. ,
/
. ,
. O
24 .
5.4.5
,
,
.
, DBS
.
,
Parkinson
.
,
Parkinson,
[43].
,
DBS.
80 .
, ,
.
,
, .
.
. ,
, .
.
, ,
, , , .
.
.
,
Parkinson
.
[22]. O
[44]. A ,
[43].
, .
,
. , ,
-. , ,
.
.
on-off, . Levodopa
STN ,
STN .
.
81
.
,
. ,
[22]. ,
, .
, ,
.
5.5
,
-,
[45].
. ,
5
. ,
,
.
,
,
.
. , ,
,
[46]. ,
,
.
5.6
Parkinson .
,
-.
,
82 .
:
:
, - Na+
Ca++.
Na+ ,
. , -
[45].
:
-
,
. ,
. , -
[47].
,
. ,
.
Parkinson
:
-.
,
.
:
,
. ,
.
- [47].
: ,
-
, , .
,
,
Parkinson.
,
, [48].
: ,
: (
) ( ). ,
83
,
. , ,
,
[45].
,
-.
-,
, [49].
[50],
,
.
. ,
5
. ,
.
.
5.7
[51], [52],
[53] [54],
.
-,
,
.
5.6
. ,
. ,
. ,
84 .
,
,
.
1. [55]. ,
.
2. [56]. ,
,
.
3. [57]. ,
.
Parkinson
4. [58]. ,
.
, [59].
,
([46],[60]).
[61].
[62].
,
[63]. ,
,
[64].
:
( )
( ).
, 85
([46],[60]).
,
[65].
([66], [67]). ,
[68].
.
130
/s [69]. , 100 /sec ,
50 .
,
5
[70]. ,
, .
,
.
5.7
[42] Bejjani B, Dormont D, Pidoux B, Yelnik J, Damier P, Arnulf I, Bonnet AM, Marsault
C, Agid Y, Philippon J, Cornu P (2000) Bilateral subthalamic stimulation for
Parkinsons disease by using three dimensional stereotactic magnetic resonance
imaging and electrophysiological guidance J Neurosurg 92 615-625
[43] Krack P, Fraix V, Mendes A, Benabid A, Pollak P (2002) Postoperative management
of subthalamic nucleus stimulation for Parkinson's disease Mov Disord 17 S188-S197
[44] Patel N, Plaha P, O'Sullivan K, McCarter R, Heywood P (2003) MRI directed bilateral
stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in patients with Parkinson's disease J Neurol
Neurosurg Psychiatry 74 1631-1637
[45] Lozano A, Dostrovsky J, Chen R, Ashby P (2002) Deep brain stimulation for
Parkinsons disease: disrupting the disruption The Lancet Neurology 1 225-231
[46] McIntyre C, Grill W, Sherman D, Thakor N (2004) Cellular effects of deep brain
stimulation: model-based analysis of activation and inhibition Journal of
Neurophysiology 1 1457-1469
[47] Dostrovsky J, Lozano A (2002) Mechanisms of deep brain stimulation Movement
Disorders 7 S63-S68
[48] Montgomery E, Gale J (2005) Mechanisms of deep brain stimulation: implications for
physiology, pathophysiology and future therapies 10th Annual Conference of the
International FES Society
[49] Vitek J (2002) Mechanisms of deep brain stimulation: excitation or inhibition
Movement Disorders 7 S69-S72
[50] Benabid A (2003) Deep brain stimulation for Parkinsons disease Current Opinion in
Neurobiology 13 696-706 89
.
Parkinson
.
.
6.1
91
, (,
.), -
- ( ). ,
.
.
, 2 ,
.
:
50-350m ([1], [2])
0.5-3mm
6
[3],
[4]. .
6.1.1
,
,
([9]-[11]), ,
[8]
[4]
92
[12].
,
.
.
.
.
,
.
.
,
,
,
. ,
[13].
, ,
.
, ,
,
(0.5-3mm) .
- DBS
[14]
[15].
Tsubokawa Sutin 1972 [16].
Parkinson. Kuhn
-
(. 10 [17]). ,
93
,
([18]-[19]).
,
,
[20]. ,
([21], [22]).
[23]
,
,
- - ([24],
[25]). ,
, ,
6
, ,
.
H ,
, -
[22]. ,
' ,
.
, ,
, Parkinson, .
. ,
Parkinson,
.
[20],
[17].
94
,
.
([1], [8], [19], [26]-[33]). ,
.
ms [22], ,
( )
,
.
,
,
6.1.2
To .
:
.
.
.
95
.
25
.
Dayhoff Gerstein
[38].
.
, .
[39]. ,
,
[40].
6
,
()
/
. 6.2.3,
. .
6.1.3
, . ,
( 1 ms),
.
(point process).
[41].
,
.
Si,i= 1,2,...
. Si,i=si,i= 1,2,...
0< Si,< Sj,i < j, i=1,2,.. j=2,3,... i,i=1,2,..
96
. i
1=S1 i=Si-Si-1.
= =1 . --
.
. N(t),
t.
(0,t]. (t1-t2)
(t1,t2], (t1-t2) = (t2)-N(t1). (t1-t2)
t1 t2.
.
.
,
.
,
.
, (0,T]
n . = tk = kt k=1,,n.
.
=N(t)-N(t) .
.
. t ( 41s,
6.2),
.
{}, =1,2,,n 0 1
.
6.2
Parkinson DBS,
4 .
,
97
.
6.2.1
,
5. ,
Volt
.
[42].
,
.
.
. , 10 s ,
(24 kHz).
6
Ben Gun
5.4.5.1.
( 6.1).
: : C (Central), : (Anterior),
: (Posterior), : L (Lateral),
: (Medial).
2 mm.
m,
, .
, .
98
,
,
( )
. (
), ,
( -),
( 0 mm) ( +).
( STN)
CT MRI
. , 0,5 mm
12 (-3 mm / -2.5 mm / -2 mm / -1.5 mm / -1 mm / -0.5 mm / 0
mm / +0.5 mm / +1 mm / +1.5 mm).
(.
STN ), Ben Gun
0.1 mm.
.
STN,
-.
6.2.2
( )
MatLab (The MathWorks, Natick, MA)
.
.
6.1,
:
.
[43]. , (>500
z) 5,
(<200 Hz)
.
: 99
1. , , .
, , :
)
.
, ,
[21], )
. , (
)
. ( 6.3)
,
.
5
1 ms. ,
Nyquist Shannon, ,
2 ms.
6
6.2
2. -.
. ,
(<6 kHz)
100 2. ,
12 kHz. T
50%.
FIR equiripple
peak-to-peak (p-p)
1.610-5 db.
3. .
,
, .
FIR equiripple
2100 , [0 150] z, [0.18 6]
kHz p-p 210-6 db.
FIR
equiripple [0 450] Hz [2.55 6] kHz,
[0.5 2.5] kHz p-p .
6.2.
6.2.3
[44].
.
, .
.
(
)
. ,
, ,
-
.
,
. ,
.
.
.
, .
,
() (principal component analysis 101
PCA) - (K-means) ( 6.3). ,
(
),
( ),
, .
,
.
,
{0,1}
. ,
,
6.1.2.1.
6
, .
6.4.
- 1 s. ,
.
6.4 .
, (
) .
6.3
6.4 () ( 1,
STN, lateral , +1.0 mm ). ()
() H -
1 s .
.
, ,
( 6.1.2.1). , 103
(
)
.
.
6.3.1
() (empirical cumulative
distribution function-CDF)
. ,
N(t) 6.1.2.1.
,
,
45.
,
45.
6
--
,
() (interspike interval ISI).
. ,
,
,
.
, ,
. ,
,
.
()
.
, (
) Gauss
.
104 .
.
,
0.5 ms 6.7 ms.
.
,
.
, ,
. 10 s,
, r, 9 -
1 s .
kappa (kappa measure) [45]. , ,
{0,1}
{0,1}
, , .
= 0 0 + 1 1 . 0 = 0,0 + 1,1
(
), = (0 )(1 ).
(above-chance). H
(
0 = ) ( 0 = 1).
, kappa
, d, 2.5 ms (30 ).
, d
10 ms,
. (400% ), kappa
, .
, d
2.5 ms, kappa. ,
, kappa
(selection-biased) (
) 99% .
ad-hoc
.
S1
( 30 ) . S2 105
( 30 ).
. ,
( )
. ,
. S1 S2 ,
. ,
S2 S1 ,
. ,
, .
,
, S1S2. 1,
. , S1S2 > 0.25,
50% (30 )
.
6
6.3.2
,
. ,
. , , h,
. H h
()
Freedman-Diaconis [46] = 2 ,
1/3
IQR (interquartile range) x n
. h
, h=5 ms,
, .
(coherence squared function) [47]. H
,
, .
, 1.
, 0.
0 1, :
) , )
106 () () .
,
. ,
(residuals) .
(Gauss)
.
.
6.4
,
()
.
( 6.5).
.
6.5
.
(s) .
. 107
6.5
[1] Legatt A, Arezzo J, Vaughan H (1980) Averaged multiple unit activity as an estimate
of phasic changes in local neuronal activity: effects of volume-conducted potentials J.
Neurosci. Methods 2 203-217
[2] Gray C, Maldonado P, Wilson M, McNaughton B (1995) Tetrodes markedly improve
the reliability and yield of multiple single-unit isolation from multi-unit recordings in
cat striate cortex J. Neurosci. Methods 63 4354
[3] Juergens E, Guettler A, Eckhorn R (1999) Visual stimulation elicits locked and
induced gamma oscillations in monkey intracortical- and EEG- potentials, but not in
human EEG Exp. Brain Res 129 247259
[4] Kobayashi M, Inoue T, Matsuo R, Masuda Y, Hidaka O, Kang Y, Morimoto T (1997)
Role of calcium conductances on spike afterpotentials in rat trigeminal motoneurons
J. Neurophysiol 77 3273-3283
[5] Mitzdorf U (1987) Properties of the evoked-potential generators current source-
density analysis of visually evoked-potentials in the cat cortex Intern. J. Neurosci. 33
3359
6
[6] Eccles C (1951) Interpretation of action potentials evoked in the cerebral cortex J.
Neurophysiol. 3 449464
[7] Bedard C, Kroger H, Destexhe A (1986) Modeling extracellular field potentials and
the frequency-filtering properties of extracellular space Biophys. J. 204 18291842
[8] Kamondi A, Acsady L, Buzsaki G (1998) Dendritic spikes are enhanced by
cooperative network activity in the intact hippocampus J. Neurosci. 18 39193928
[9] Bullock TH (1997) Signals and signs in the nervous system: the dynamic anatomy of
electrical activity is probably information-rich Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences of the United States of America 94 1-6
[10] Kasamatsu T, Kitano M, Sutter E, Norcia A (1998) Lack of lateral inhibitory
interactions in visual cortex of monocularly deprived cats Vision Res. 38 1-12
[11] Azouz R, Gray C (1999) Cellular Mechanisms Contributing to Response Variability of
Cortical Neurons In Vivo The Journal of Neuroscience 19 2209-2223
[12] Valentine P, Eggermont J (2001) Spontaneous burst-firing in three auditory cortical
fields: its relation to local field potentials and its effect on inter-area cross-correlations
Hear. Res. 154 146-157
[13] Creutzfeldt O, Watanabe S, Lux H (1966) Relations between EEG phenomena and
potentials of single cortical cells. I. Evoked responses after thalamic and epicortical
stimulation Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 20 1-18
[14] Dinner D, Neme S, Nair D, Montgomery E, Baker K, Rezai A, et al. (2002) EEG and
evoked potential recording from the subthalamic nucleus for deep brain stimulation
of intractable epilepsy Clin Neurophysiol 113 1391-402
[15] Wennberg R, Lozano A (2003) Intracranial volume conduction of cortical spikes and
sleep potentials recorded with deep brain stimulating electrodes Clin Neurophysiol
108 114 1403-1418
[16] Tsubokawa T, Sutin J (1972) Pallidal and tegmental inhibition of oscillatory slow
waves and unit activity in the subthalamic nucleus Brain Res. 41 101-108
[17] Kuhn A, Trottenberg T, Kivi A, Kupsch A, Schneider G, Brown P (2005) The
relationship between local field potential and neuronal discharge in the subthalamic
nucleus of patients with Parkinsons disease Exp. Neurol. 194 212220
[18] Magill P, Sharott A, Bolam J, and Brown P (2004) Brain state-dependency of coherent
oscillatory activity in the cerebral cortex and basal ganglia of the rat J. Neurophysiol.
92 21222136
[19] Magill P, Sharott A, Bevan M, Brown P, and Bolam J (2004) Synchronous unit activity
and local field potentials evoked in the subthalamic nucleus by cortical stimulation. J.
Neurophysiol. 92 700714
[20] Walters J, Hu D, Itoga C, Parr-Brownlie L, Bergstrom D (2005) Do local field
potentials reflect synchronized spiking activity of neuronal populations in the basal
ganglia? Studies in a rodent model of Parkinson's disease in: Bolam J, Ingham C,
Magill P (eds.), The Basal Ganglia VIII 37-46
[21] Bevan M, Magill P, Termanc D, Bolamb J, Wilsond C (2002) Move to the rhythm:
oscillations in the subthalamic nucleusexternal globus pallidus network Trends
Neurosci. 25 525-31
110
-
7.1
H , 2.2.3, -
.
. ,
. Parkinson, ,
70% . ,
. , 111
.
(linear time invariant - LTI) (
)
.
.
Wiener
1972 [1].
,
,
.
, ,
, , ,
7
() = 0 / , (7.1)
, x
0
(x=0) [2]. ,
, (
),
( -
. [3]). ,
, ,
.
,
Wiener, Hammerstein-Wiener
(H-W).
a priori ,
. ,
-,
-. To , ,
. . ,
- .
112
,
.
LTI
- ( 7.1) Voltera-
Wiener . (steady state)
-
-
.
7.1 Hammerstein-Wiener
-
, = , ,
H-W , 7.1,
() = (())
+ 1 + +
() = () = () (7.2)
+ 1 + +
() = (())
( )
- .
- ()
, ,,, ,, , ,
, B, , F, ,
B F
- ()
.
, H-W
- , -
. (piecewise
linear)
.
( )
- . 113
,
.
7.3 H-W
H
.
,
.
( 10 s
), 5% 10%
.
, 6.2.3, ,
[, ] , .
,
. , w,
7
80%
20% . w
4 ms 12 ms ( 1 ms).
, w = 8 ms (96 ).
,
25 50 [, ] (
). ,
. ,
(overfit) ,
, .
7.2
. w = 5 ms
4.1 ms . 7.2
. 6.2.3,
( 0 = , 1 =
). ,
,
. 7.2,
114
7.2
. () ( ) (
) 4.1 ms
-
2 ms . 7.2,
7.2.
H H-W .
-
.
-
.
. -
, 20 Gauss-Newton,
1 ,
. -
,
Levenberg-Marquardt (
. [4].)
(model refinement). [, ],
( 7.2). ,
6.3, ,
. 115
1 s 2 s .
,
, 7.3.
(. 6.2.3), 8
10 [, ] (
1 ).
,
.
, [, ]
. ,
,
[, ] .
.
7
7.3
7.4 ()
117
.
, .
.
. ()
,
,
.
- . ,
, (10)
- (.
7.4). ,
( 7.4).
, -
,
, .
7
7.4
(5) , (3)
. , ,
1, 2 3 , ,
4 .
,
, 1
mm, . ,
, 1.
.
.
2
3.
Ben-Gun, 25 6.
,
. 2 3,
-
118
. 3
.
STN STN
( ) ( )
1 1 (0mm) 5 (0mm)
6
, , ,
0.1 mm , ,
.
-
2 H-W
/ / .
() / []
[]
1 -1.0 mm 1 10/10 [0,1]
(Central) [1,-0.649]
+0.0 mm 2 10/10 [0,1,-0.974]
(Central) [1,-1.764,0.781]
-0.5 mm 3 18/18 [0,1]
(Posterior) [1,-0.956]
-0.5 mm 4 10/10 [0,1]
(Lateral) [1, -0.451]
+1.0 mm 5 20/20 [0,1]
(Lateral) [1,-0.987]
-1.0 mm 6 10/3 [0,1]
(Central) [1,-0.068]
+0.5 mm 7 25/4 [0,1]
(Central) [1,0.866]
-1.0 mm 8 10/10 [0,1]
(Posterior) [1,-0.949]
119
+0.00 mm 9 30/3 [0,1]
(Medial) [1,-0.279]
+0.5 mm 10 10/10 [0,1]
(Lateral) [1,-0.871]
2 -1.0 mm 11 3/3 [0,-0.952,1]
(Central) [1,0.859]
-0.5 mm 12 10/10 [0,0.962,1]
(Medial) [1]
3 -1.5 mm 13 15/5 [0,-0.999,1]
(Lateral) [1]
-1.5 mm 14 15/5 [0,-40.970,1]
(Posterior) [1]
-2.5 mm 15 15/5 [0,-0.523,1]
(Medial) [1]
-3.0 mm 16 15/5 [0,-1.075,1]
(Medial) [1,-0.979]
7
3 H-W
.
.
/ /
() / []
[]
1 +1.0 mm 2 101 10/10 [0,1]
(Central) [1,-0.918]
+0.0 mm 3 102 10/10 [0,1]
(Anterior) [1,-0.592]
-0.5 mm 4 103 1/3 [0,1]
(Central) [1,-0.787]
-0.5 mm 2 104 10/3 [0,1]
(Central)* [1,-0.507]
-1.0 mm 2 105 20/20 [0,1]
(Central)* [1,-1.172,0.346]
-0.5 mm 2 106 10/10 [0,1]
(Medial) [1 -0.785]
-0.8 mm 2 107 10/10 [0,1]
(Medial) [1 -0.546]
2 -1.0 mm 2 108 3/3 [0,1,-0.417]
120 (Central)* [1]
-1.5 mm 2 109 3/3 [0,-0.995,1]
(Central) [1]
-1.5 mm 2 110 2/3 [0,-0.620,1,-0.410]
(Central)* [1]
+0.0 mm 2 111 10/10 [0,-0.446,1,-0.569]
(Central) [1,0.384]
3 -1.5 mm 2 112 10/10 [0,-160.495,1]
(Posterior) [1]
-1.5 mm 2 113 10/10 [0,-0.972,1]
(Posterior)* [1]
-1.0 mm 3 114 3/3 [0,1]
(Lateral) [1,-1.928,0.943]
-2.0 mm 2 115 30/10 [0,-0.898,1]
(Lateral) [1]
-1.0 mm 2 116 20/3 [0,-1.249,1]
(Posterior) [1]
-
7.57.7
1, 2
3 . -
. ,
(. 7.5, 7.6, 7.7-),
(. 7.5, 7.6).
7.
(. 7.5, 7.5, 7.7)
,
-.
-
.
.
.
(.
121
)
. ,
(AR-MA).
7.5
,
.
,
(
) .
7
, , . Peter J. Magill,
, . Gabriel Kreiman,
Harvard, ,
in vitro in vivo
122
7.5 1. -
7
, -
-
7.6 2. -
, -
123
124
7.7 1. -
7
, -
-
7.5.1
7.8
.
(lateral)
3, 1.5 mm
.
(
7.8) H-W .
[,] 7.8 .
7.8.
8 s 7.8.
7.8.
.
. ,
,
,
.
(7.10 s 7.20 s) (3.25
s 3.35 s).
, .
.
, 5, , 125
,
. ,
,
( ). 7.8
.
, 7.9
( 7.3) 2.
(
) .
, 4 ( 7.9)
( 7.9).
126
7.8 . 3, STN, lateral, 1.5
(D75min15) () .
. () 90 ms . . () 90 ms
. () () - ,
, - . () .
()
() .
7
-
( 7.9)
0.5 ( 7.9).
.
.
, ,
.
( 7.9).
.
. ,
,
.
7.5.2
7.10
. .
( 7.10). 9.5 s , 448
. - 127
128 7.9
() ()
()
()
. ()
.
.
,
, ,
[, ]
().
7.10-. H-W
( 7.10).
. 45 ( 7.10).
45 2 (
). .
-
, /
.
(14 15).
7.5.3
5 , ,
-
6.3 ( 7.11).
, 35 , 2 (substantial)
(k0.6), 5 (moderate) (0.4 k<0.6), 19
(fair) (0.2k<0.4). 7 (slight)
(k<0.2) . , 7
, 6
. ,
S1S2 6.3.1. 35
70% (S1S2 0.49),
7.11.
. 35 (9
, 13 3 )
50% ( 30 ). 7
, ,
130 50% ( 30 ).
S1S2
. (. 1,
D71plus10).
.
, ,
43%
( 7.12 ). ,
3/5
. . ,
.
( 7.12 ).
29%,
, 50
ms. ,
-
7.11 () S1S2 ()
131
7
7.12 ()
()
. () ,
.
132
.
,
,
.
[5].
,
.
,
. ms
.
,
.
-
5.5 s ( 7.13).
H-W 5 [, ],
w(k) = [B(z)/F(z)]v(k), B(z) = z-1, F(z) = 1 - 0.98z-1 4
- .
, 100 ms ,
.
(1.0 s 1.2 s, 2.0 s 2.3 s, 2.55 s 2.75 s, 4.4 s 4.6 s, 5.1 s 5.3
s) .
. (
)
(. 7.13)
(
), ,
3 db ( 7.13). 3 db
( 7.13).
3 db,
.
133
7.13 ()
1, STN, , 1.0 mm
(S1-D75plus10). () ()
3 db () 3 db
7
7.14
. () 8 ,
1, STN, 0.02 s, () 11 ,
1, STN, 0.1 s, () 8 ,
2, STN, 0.2 s.
H-W
,
.
, (
)
. 7.14
.
134
( )
. ,
().
.
() .
,
(skewed). ,
100 ms
.
7.6
6.1.1,
, ,
. ( )
-
, , 6.1.1.1,
( ) .
-,
- .
-
STN.
-W
.
,
. , ,
- .
.
, ,
. ,
H-W
.
([6]-[8]), .
135
. ,
,
, ,
H-W .
.
,
,
, .
.
()
.
[9].
7
,
. H-W
. , ,
.
,
().
,
.
.
()
.
, ,
(R-C) [10]. ,
136
(multiple input single output MISO) (multiple input multiple output
MIMO) . .
,
.
. ,
- [11].
L-dopa
,
Parkinson [12].
,
.
-
, H-W
. ,
.
7.7
138
Izhikevich
Izhikevich
Izhikevich 2003
:
(. ,
.). 4.4, Hodgkin-Huxley,
, . ,
& ,
,
.
.
, , 139
.
,
,
,
. ,
( ).
8.1 Izhikevich
Izhikevich [1]
. .
,
. :
8
dV
= 0, 04V 2 + 5V + 140 V + I (8.1)
dt
= du a (bV u ) (8.2)
dt
V ( mV).
, V 30
mV, :
V =c
(8.3)
u= u + d
a, b, c d
. t
ms. To
. u
(recovery variable)
K+ Na+,
V. , V,
(30 mV) , V
, u, (8.3).
8.1.1 O a,b,c, d
a, b, c, d
.
a u.
,
.
b u
V, .
b V u,
-
(sub-threshold oscillations).
Izhikevich
c
, -
+.
d u
, - Na+
+.
8.2 Izhikevich
.
.
a, b, c, d, Izhikevich
,
.
4.
8.1 , MATLab,
4.
.
141
, Izhikevich , ,
,
.
, Hodgkin-Huxley,
.
8.2.1 Izhikevich
, ,
.
Izhikevich, Bevan
& Wilson ([2], [3],
:
i) 3 20 Hz.
ii)
,
.
8
4 a, b, c d
Izhikevich [1]
a b c d
(6)
0,01 0,2 -65 8
(20)
-0,026 -1 -45 0
Izhikevich
8.1 Izhikevich a, b, c, d 4.
143
8
iii) ,
,
.
Izhikevich
: a = 0,005, b = 0,265, c = -65 d = 1,5 [4].
Izhikevich
8.2
.
,
8.3.
8.2
.
.
, 5 Hz. 500
ms 500 ms 1500 ms
500 ms.
.
, ,
144
8.2
Izhikevich
8.3
, . 8.3
, 145
. 8.2 8.3 ,
. ,
500-1000 ms
8.2.
8.3
Izhikevich
8 .
.
.. ,
8
, .
8
.
.
( )
.
,
.
,
, .
Poisson (: r
, (r , t ) (r )
) :
[ (r ) (r , t ) ] = (r , t ) (8.4)
(8.4), ,
,
146 [5]:
1 I (t ) (8.5)
(r , t ) =
4 r
,
(), ,
.
- r = r = 1 mm
= 1,7
S/m.
, , , (8.5)
, .
,
I= (8.5)
= 4.
Izhikevich
, 4 ,
Izhikevich.
8.4
Izhikevich
. ,
Izhikevich
8.2.1, 8.4.
,
3 (. 1, . 118), 1.5 mm
( S3- D75min15). , ,
3.8( ).
,
147
8.4
( S3-D75min15) : ()
Izhikevich () : ()
. , 50 ms,
. .
() . 45
95% ()
,
Gauss.
8
,
Parkinson.
1.0,
- 50 ms. ,
95%
0.5 s .
0.57 ( = 6.6 ms).
. 8.5
( 50 ms - )
( = 6.6 ms).
8.5
,
.
.
( S1-
D83min10). ,
148
8.5
. ,
,
.
Izhikevich
5 Izhikevich
S3-D75min15
0.91 6
1.05 5
1.26 3
0.88 5
1.08 9
1 0.99 10
2 0.96 1
0.91 6
- 0.88 1
0.80 1
0.98 10
149
1.13 3
1.13 2
,
( S2-D84min05).
,
.
.
,
.
,
,
. S3-
D75min15 Izhikevich
5.
5, 4.
8
8.5
Izhikevich,
. ,
2, 6 7
.
,
.
.
. ,
1% - 2%
( 250 300 ).
,
.
.
, 10 .
150
8.6
[1] Izhikevich EM (2003) Simple model of spiking neurons IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks
14 1569-1572
[2] Bevan MD, Wilson CJ (1999) Mechanisms underlying spontaneous oscillation and rhythmic
firing in rat subthalamic nucleus Journal of Neuroscience 9 7617-7628
[3] Bevan M, Magill P, Terman D, Bolam J, Wilson C (2002) Move to the rhythm: oscillations in
the subthalamic nucleus external globus pallidus network Trends in Neurosciences 5 525
[4] Modolo J, Henry J, Beuter A (2008) Dynamics of the subthalamo-pallidal complex in
Parkinsons disease during deep brain stimulation Journal of Biological Physics 34 351-366
[5] Nunez P, Srinivasan R (2006) Electric Fields of the Brain The Neurophysics of EEG 2nd
edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
9.1
.
,
. 2.2.5,
,
. , ,
(. 7.1). 151
,
.
.
2.2.4,
,
.
, V,
, , .
, Vm
, , .
([2], [3]).
,
( 3.1),
9
.
,
.
.
t=0,
( 9.1):
= VM e t
: V (9.1)
: V= VM t e t (9.2)
: V= VM (e t 1 + e t 2 ) (9.3)
Van Rotterdam
[1].
. 1 2
. ,
,
.
10 ms 100 ms.
,
.
152
,
. ,
. ,
.
9.1
. () , ()
, ()
9.2 .
7.1,
, .
, 153
. ,
. ,
. ,
2.2.5,
.
.
. 9.2.
9.2
,
.
7 8. ,
9
154
9.3 .
() () . ()-()
. ()
155
9.4 .
() () . ()-()
. ()
.
9
.
, .
9.3
. 3
1 ( , 3 mm
, ). = 0.045
(
) 0.01 s,
( 9.3 ).
50 ms.
.
9.4.
4 ( , , 0
mm ).
, .
.
,
50 ms. 9.4 ,
.
156 .
9.3
,
, .
7 8,
.
9.5
. 1
1 ( , 3 mm
, ). 1 = 9, 2 = 30
0.01 s,
( 9.5 ).
50 ms.
9.5 .
() () . ()-()
. ()
.
157
9.4
,
,
.
. , Hammerstein-Wiener
,
. ,
, , (
) .
.
9
( 9.1). ,
, ,
.
, ,
, ,
.
,
, -
Izhikevich, , , .
.
, ,
,
.
9.5
[1] Van Rotterdam A, Lopes da Silva F, Van den Ende J, Viergever M, Hermans A (1982)
A model of the spatial-temporal characteristics of the alpha rhythm Bulletin of
Mathematical Biology 44 283-305
[2] Bullock T (1997) Signals and signs in the nervous system: The dynamic anatomy of
electrical activity is probably information-rich Proceedings of the National Academy of
158
Sciences of the United States of America 94(1) 1-6
[3] Mitzdorf U (1985) Current source-density method and application in cat cerebral
cortex: investigation of evoked potentials and EEG phenomena Physiol. Rev. 65 37
100
10
- Izhikevich
10.1
5,
. ,
Parkinson (, , ) [1]
([2], [3]).
159
, .,
.
. ,
.
,
.
- ,
.
,
.
10
10.2 Izhikevich
10.2.1
Izhikevich
8.
(8.1) (8.3).
,
4.
8.2.1,
a = 0,005, b = 0,265, c = -65 d = 1,5. ,
(a = 0,02, b = 0,2, c = -65 d = 6). (8.5) 8.3
, ,
.
160
10.1 ( )
() Izhikevich
(). ( ) (), ()
().
(4.15) :
2t 2 (t + DBS ) (10.1)
I DBS = i DBS H sin 1 H sin
DBS DBS
Heaviside, DBS
, iDBS DBS
.
( 1 5 V, 60 200 s,
120 180 Hz)
[4].
10.2.2
8, Izhikevich
. 10.1 10.2
. 10.1,
161
10.2 ( )
() Izhikevich
(). ( ) (),
() ().
10
Izhikevich
10.2,
. , ,
45 , 8 10.1
4 10.2 ,
( ,
1.04 /50 ms 1.07 / 50 ms. ,
, 92%
95%. ,
.
10.2.3
Izhikevich . , iDBS,
( )
,
10.3.2. (ON
DBS )
9.
4 V, 200 s
162
180 Hz 10.3. ()
, 1.62 (1.88) / 50 ms OFF
DBS 4.53 (2.27) / 50 ms ON DBS .
, ,
DBS ,
( , . 5.2) .
,
.
,
. ,
([90-300] s [5]), 3V. ,
( [2.5
10] V ([5], [6]), 80 s.
9
,
.
10.3 ()
, () , () .
.
( 10.1)
( 10.2)
, 163
180 Hz.
, 150 s
4 V, . ,
, ( ),
, .
.
,
(),
( )
( 10.4 ). ,
, , ,
.
10.4 .
10
10.4 ON DBS
. (A)
() ,
Izhikevich. () ( ) ON
DBS ( )
FF DBS , () ,
164
10.3 -
H-W
. H-W
7 .
( Izhikevich)
. ,
. ,
H-W
.
Parkinson ,
. ,
, -
([7], [8]). Parkinson
,
([9], [10]).
(
) L-dopa
([9]-[12]).
L-dopa
- [13].
, -
[14].
,
( 20 Hz)
Parkinson, ( 130 Hz)
[15].
,
,
, 165
[14].
(ON DBS)
. ,
L-dopa
Parkinson [16].
,
6,
. ,
(notch filter)
. , ,
, H-W 7.
10.5.
, ) )
10
166
10.5 ON DBS
-W. 1 (S1-D72plus0)
( ) ( )
OFF DBS ( )
ON DBS ( ).
. , ( 50 ms)
OFF DBS ( )
2.035 ( 50 ms) DBS (
) 2.45. ,
1.387 1.307. , 10.6,
167
10.6 ON DBS
-W. 1 (S1-D75min05)
( ) ( )
OFF DBS ( )
ON DBS ( ).
. , 0.742
OFF DBS 1.011 ON DBS.
0.835 OFF DBS 0.826 ON DBS.
,
ON DBS ,
.
10
Izhikevich ( 10.2).
10.4
,
[17]. ,
(3 V, 136 Hz)
[17].
, , ,
,
[18]. ,
77%
() .
,
168 , , -
,
.
Parkinson ([4], [18], [19], [20]). ,
,
,
[21]. Rubin Terman
,
, ,
Parkinson
[20].
- ,
Parkinson.
10.5
[14] Wingeier B, Tcheng T, Koop M, Hill BC, Heit G, Bronte-Stewart H (2006) Intra-
operative STN DBS attenuates the prominent beta rhythm in the STN in Parkinson's
disease Exp Neurol 197 244-251
[15] Brown P, Mazzone P, Oliviero A, Altibrandi M, Pilato F, Tonali P, Di Lazzaro V
(2004) Effects of stimulation of the subthalamic area on oscillatory pallidal activity in
Parkinsons disease Exp. Neurol. 188 480490
[16] Giannicola G, Marceglia S, Rossi L, Mrakic-Sposta S, Rampini P, Tamma F,
Cogiamanian F, Barbieri S, Priori A (2010) The effects of levodopa and ongoing deep
brain stimulation on subthalamic beta oscillations in Parkinson's disease Exp Neurol.
226 120-127
[17] Hashimoto T, Elder C, Okun M, Patrick S, Vitek J (2003) Stimulation of the
subthalamic nucleus changes the firing pattern of pallidal neurons J Neurosci. 23
19161923
[18] Anderson M, Postupna N, Ruffo M (2003) Effects of high-frequency stimulation in
the internal globus pallidus on the activity of thalamic neurons in the awake monkey
Journal of neurophysiology 89 1150-1160
[19] Benabid A, Benazzouz A, Pollak P (2002) Mechanisms of deep brain stimulation Mov.
Disord. 17 S73S74
[20] Rubin J, Terman D (2004) High frequency stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus
eliminates pathological thalamic rhythmicity in a computer model Journal of
Computational Neuroscience 16 211-235
[21] Terman D, Rubin J, Yew A, Wilson C (2002) Activity patterns in a model for the
11
11.1
([1]-[15]). ,
.
,
,
. ,
. ,
171
. 1,
, ,
. ,
-
. ,
, ,
Izhikevich. ,
,
, . ,
Izhikevich
.
,
, .
, , ,
.
,
,
11
. ,
.
Gauss .
,
,
.
,
.
(
),
,
, , ,
.
, ,
172 .
, ,
.
, Sir Henry Head (4
1861 8 1940)
, , .
, ,
,
,
.
,
.
11.2
,
, ,
.
.
,
, .
,
.
, ,
,
,
, (bifurcation analysis)
(self-similarity). (equation-free)
-
- .
173
,
.
.
,
, , .
, ,
-
. ,
.
,
.
11
,
.
,
,
, ,
._
11.3
11.3.1
[1] Michmizos KP, Nikita KS (2011) Local field potential driven Izhikevich model
predicts a subthalamic nucleus neuron activity EMBC 11 Boston, USA
[2] Michmizos KP, Nikita KS (2011) Addition of deep brain stimulation signal to a local
field potential driven Izhikevich model masks the pathological firing pattern of an
STN neuron EMBC 11 Boston, USA
[3] Michmizos KP, Papavasileiou V, Sakas DE, Nikita KS (2010) Mathematical
Physiological Modeling of the relation between local field potentials and spikes
174
recorded inside the Subthalamic Nucleus IEEE ITAB 2010 Corfu, Greece
[4] Michmizos KP, Nikita KS (2010) Can We Infer Subthalamic Nucleus Spike Trains
from Intranuclear Local Field Potentials? IEEE EMBC '10 Buenos Aires, Argentina
[5] Michmizos KP, Sakas DE, Nikita KS (2009) An in-silico model of an STN neuron that
uses the LFPs to predict the spikes Consciousness and its Measures, Limassol, Cyprus
[6] Michmizos KP, Sakas DE, Nikita KS (2009) Towards Understanding the Language of
Human Subthalamic Nucleus using Intraoperative Recordings 4th Computational
Cognitive Neuroscience Conference Boston, USA
[7] Michmizos KP, Tagaris GA, Sakas DE, Nikita KS (2009) Employing LFPs and spikes
to model the non-linear behavior of the STN 18th Annual Computational Neuroscience
Meeting Berlin, Germany
[8] Michmizos KP, Tagaris GA, Sakas DE, Nikita KS (2009) Towards Input Output Non-
Linear Modeling of the Subthalamic Nucleus using Intranuclear Recordings IEEE
NER 09, Antalya, Turkey
[9] Michmizos KP, Tagaris GA, Sakas DE, Nikita KS (2008) Automatic Intra-Operative
Localization of STN using the Beta Band Frequencies of Microelectrode Recordings
IEEE BIBE 08, Athens, Greece
11.3.2
[10] Michmizos KP, Sakas DE, Nikita KS (accepted) Prediction of the timing and the
rhythm of the parkinsonian subthalamic nucleus neural spikes using the local field
potentials IEEE Transactions of Information Technology in Biomedicine (TITB-00071-2011)
[11] Michmizos KP, Sakas DE, Nikita KS (accepted) Towards relating the subthalamic
nucleus spiking activity with the local field potentials acquired intranuclearly IOP
Measurement Science and Technology (MST/380919/SPE/263146)
[12] Michmizos KP, Sakas DE, Nikita KS (accepted revisions required) A nonlinear
cascade model of spiking activity inside the motor area of the Parkinsonian
subthalamic nucleus Springer Biological Cybernetics (BICY-S-10-00140)
[13] Michmizos KP, Sakas DE, Nikita KS (under review) Can we estimate the timing and
the rhythm of the subthalamic nucleus neural spikes using the intranuclear local field
potentials? IOP Journal of Neural Engineering (JNE/388293/PAP)
[14] Michmizos KP, Sakas DE, Nikita KS (under review) A local field potential driven
Izhikevich model proves that the pathological firing pattern is masked under the
presence of a deep brain stimulation signal Journal of Computational Neuroscience 175
[15] Michmizos KP, Tagaris GA, Sakas DE, Nikita KS (2009) Employing LFPs and spikes
to model the non-linear behavior of the STN BMC Neuroscience 10 doi:10.1186/1471-
2202-10-S1-P320
11.3.3
Nikita KS, Michmizos KP, Physiological Systems Modeling Simulation and Control, in
"Biomedical Engineering Education & Advanced Bioengineering Learning:
Interdisciplinary Concepts", IGI-Global (Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA), editor: Ziad
Abu-Faraj, to be published in Dec. 2011
11.3.4
176