Professional Documents
Culture Documents
dESIGN Vup
dESIGN Vup
Data :
Culvert to be on state highway.
Carriage Width of bridge : 9
No footpath provided
Conditions of exposure : Moderate
Materials : Concrete grade M25
Density of concrete 24
Steel 500
Clear span = 6.5
Height of vent = 3
Depth of foundation = 2.3
Wearing course : 75
Main Bar dia: Bottom 20
Distribution Bar dia: Bottom 10
Clear cover: 30
Top Width of Abutment: 1
Width of Pier: 0.8
i. Preliminary dimensions :
Slab thickness (assumed) =(at the rate of 90-110 mm per m of span) 0.625
Effective depth = 0.585
Width of bearing = 0.49
Effective span= 6.99
= (1/)+
Here x = 3.495
L = 6.99
B = 9
B/L = 1.29
From table , k = 2.33
b w= 1
be = 5.07168
Overall width of slab for maximum loading = 6.76084
The tracked vehicle is placed close to the kerb with the required min clearance,
The spread of load to the Edge is limited to the actual width available,
to 2.175 m from the center of left track instead of half the effective width. There is an
of effective widths for two tracks. The dispersion to the right of the right side track is a
as computed, i.e., half the effective width beyond the center of right track. The net
effective width of dispersion for two tracks, after allowing for the overlap, is 6.7608375
q= 29.440
Maximum B.M. at centre of span = 111.129
v. Live load B.M. -Class A two-lane loading
The two axle loads of 114 kN each are to be placed in the span so as to produce
maximum B.M.
Total load 114
Width of tyre contanct area parallel to span
Width of tyre contanct area parallel to span 250
Width of tyre contanct area parallel to width 500
C/C distance b/w two wheels 1800
C/C distance b/w two vehicles 1700
This is greater than the spacing of 1200 mm between the 114 kN axle loads. Th
dispersion areas overlap. Hence the axles are to be placed symmetrically w.r.to centr
line of span to produce maximum B.M.
Impact factor = 0.347
The wheels are arranged across the width of the deck as shown in Fig.
For this condition, using the effective width method maximum shear
including effect of impact =
To compute the live load shear due to class AA tracked vehicle the track is
placed
in such a way that longitudinally dispersed zone will just be at the
support.
Distance of the centre of gravity of the concentreted load from the nearest
support
x=
The shear due to two lanes of class A loading is also be computed and found to be
smaller than the above two values.
Shear from Class AA wheeled loading governs the design.
Total design shear =
By equation
Shear stress, =
Using equation
k1 =
Reinforcement 20 dia 150 mmC/C
As =
=
k2 =
For M25 grade concrete, co =
c = k1*k2* co
Since <c , the shear stresses within limits and no shear reinforcement is necessary.
m
Kn/m3
N/mm2
m
m
m
mm
mm
mm
mm
m
m
moment.
m
m
m
m
kN
kN
kN
kN-m
%
KN
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
min clearance,
kN
kN/m2
kN-m
kn
max B.M. in slab.
mmetrically
o span is computed as below:
m
mm
m
m
m
m
m
computed
m
m
uired clearance
is computed as below :
kn/m2
kN-m
o as to produce
kn
mm
mm
mm
mm
m
mm
kN/m2
kN-m
three conditions.
kN-m
kN-m
M25
500 N/mm2
8.5 Mpa
275 Mpa
1.1
0.9
352.398 mm
585 mm
1952.14 mm2
161 mm
161 mm
150 mm
be check .
s near to the support
58.716 kN
e track is placed
e support.
e nearest support
2.50 m
4.75 m
6.8 m
24.2 Kn/m2
75.9 kN
2.26084 m
4.57 m
6.77 m
26.6 Kn/m2
81.83 kN
ed and found to be
140.546 kN
0.25 MPa
0.7305 0.5
2094.67 mm2
0.35806
0.58952 1
0.4 MPa
0.2922 Mpa
ment is necessary.
Data :
Culvert to be on state highway.
Carriage Width of bridge : 12
No footpath provided
Conditions of exposure : Moderate
Materials : Concrete grade M25
Density of concrete 24
Steel 500
Clear span = 5
Height of vent = 3
Depth of foundation = 1.35
Wearing course : 56
Main Bar dia: Bottom 16
Distribution Bar dia: Bottom 12
Clear cover: 50
Width of Abutment: 0.8
Width of Pier: 0.8
i. Preliminary dimensions :
Slab thickness (assumed) =(at the rate of 90-110 mm per m of span) 0.55
Effective depth = 0.492
Width of bearing = 0.4
Effective span= 5.4
Here x = 2.7
L = 5.4
B = 12
B/L = 2.22
From table , k = 3
b w= 0.962
be = 5.012
Overall width of slab for maximum loading = 6.731
The tracked vehicle is placed close to the kerb with the required min clearance,
The spread of load to the ddge is limited to the actual width available,
to 2.175 m from the center of left track instead of half the effective width. There is an ove
of effective widths for two tracks. The dispersion to the right of the right side track is allow
as computed, i.e., half the effective width beyond the center of right track. The net
effective width of dispersion for two tracks, after allowing for the overlap, is 6.731 m
q= 32.806
Maximum B.M. at centre of span = 83.7947
The two axle loads of 114 kN each are to be placed in the span so as to produce
maximum B.M.
Total load 114
Width of tyre contanct area parallel to span
Width of tyre contanct area parallel to span 250
Width of tyre contanct area parallel to width 500
C/C distance b/w two wheels 1800
C/C distance b/w two vehicles 1700
Minimum clearence b/w road face and kerb 0.15
This is greater than the spacing of 1200 mm between the 114 kN axle loads. The
dispersion areas overlap. Hence the axles are to be placed symmetrically w.r.to centre
line of span to produce maximum B.M.
Impact factor = 0.39474
The wheels are arranged across the width of the deck as shown in Fig.
For this condition, using the effective width method maximum shear
including effect of impact =
The shear due to two lanes of class A loading is also be computed and found to be
smaller than the above two values.
Shear from Class AA wheeled loading governs the design.
Total design shear =
By equation
Shear stress, =
Using equation
k1 =
Reinforcement 20 dia 150 mmC/C
As =
=
k2 =
For M25 grade concrete, co =
c = k1*k2* co
Since <c , the shear stresses within limits and no shear reinforcement is necess
m
Kn/m3
N/mm2
m
m
m
mm
mm
mm
mm
m
m
moment.
m 550
m
m
m
kN
kN
kN
kN-m
%
KN
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
min clearance,
kN
kN/m2
kN-m
kn
max B.M. in slab.
mmetrically
o span is computed as below:
m
mm
m
m
m
m
computed
m
m
uired clearance
is computed as below :
kn/m2
kN-m
o as to produce
kn
mm
mm
mm
mm
m
m
mm
kN-m
kN-m
three conditions.
kN-m
kN-m
M25
500 N/mm2
8.3 Mpa
200 Mpa
1.1
0.9
295.626 mm
492 mm
1085.52 mm2
185.304 mm
185 mm
per meter width
39.4428 kN-m
478 mm
458.424 mm2
246.82 mm
246 mm
be check .
s near to the support
ce equal to effective depth from the suports.
39.2688 kN
e track is placed
e support.
71.5 kN
79.1 kN
ed and found to be
118.369 kN
0.24059 MPa
0.797 0.5
2094.67 mm2
0.42575
0.60644 1
0.4 MPa
0.3188 Mpa
inforcement is necessary.