INUTES OF THE 2N OF CHIEF ENGINEERS MEETING DURING THE YEAR 2016 HELD AT 3.00 P.M. ON 28-05-2016 IN THE GODAVARI CONFERENCE HALL OF ENGINEER-IN-CHIEF (Admin), WATER RESORCES DEPARTMENT, ERRUM MANZIlL, HYDERABAD. The Engineer-in-Chief (Admin), Chairman of Board of Chief Engineers welcomed the participants and placed the following agenda for discussions by the members of the Board of Chief Engineers. The names of the officers attended to the meeting are appended vide Annexure-L The Engineer-in-Chief (Admin) initiated the discussions Item Ne Pula Subbaiah Veligonda Project ~ Tunnel- 1 ~ Rate approval ~ Regarding (Proposed by Engineer-in-Chief, I.W., WR Dept, Hyderabad) Agenda: Pula Subbaiah Veligonda Project - “Construction of Tunnel-t including Construction of Head regulator and approach channel of Pola Subbaiah Veligonda Project in Prakasam District including all allied works duly obtaining necessary permission from the Government of India” Claim by agency on impact of abrasive rock met during execution of Tunnel with TBM from Km 11.960 in terms of G.0. Ms. No. 22 dt. 23.02.2015 -For approval of BoCEs The subject work of Pula Subbaiah Veligonda Project was entrusted to M/s Sabir, Sew & Prasad(JV), Hyderabad with an Agreement Period of 3 years i, upto 19.08.2008, ‘The above work was proposed to take up through TBM Technology and the actual work of ‘Tunnel boring through TBM was commenced in the year 2008 which was imported from HKT-Germany. Ihe Government had accorded 4" extension of time up to 30.062017. The Chiet Engineer(P), Ongole, had informed that the Agency had addressed the department that hard strata (Abrasive rock) is present at Km 11.960 and the work was stopped by the agency at Km 12.062 on 12.10.2014 stating their inability to sustain the work on account ‘of negative cash flows due to cost over runs duly furnishing the test report of Los Angeles ‘Abrasion Test conducted by RVRIC Engineering College, Guntur and report on laboratory tests which were conducted by a geologist from Germany. The project was prioritized by the Government so that Stage-1 works are to be completed by 2016, Subsequently, the agency resumed the work on 08.05.2015 as to some claims were received by the Agency in terms of GO Ms. No. 22, dt-23.022015 and continued in the ‘same rock strata condition.During visit by the Hon'ble Chief Minister to the Veligonda project site a Dornala ‘on 14052015, the Hon'ble CM instructed to interact with the machine manufacturers and foreign experts regarding the situations encountered. Accordingly, itis reported that the Indian agency of manufacturing Company was contacted and an expert on the subject from Switzerland had visited the site and furnished the inspection report for improving the TBM operation Further, it was reported that the Technical expert committee had inspected the project site on 09,07,2015(Tunnel-1) and observed that a) The rate of boring varies from minute to minute and the hard nature of the formation has a bearing on the rate of progress. The pressure being employed by the cutter has to be decided based on the experience. by At the time of inspection, the thrust was increased from 12000kN to 16000KN which resulted in slight increase in the progress per the day. The progress was 5 meters as against 2 meters earlier. Based on the above observations, the Technical Committee, among other things, have made the following recommendations: 1a) The escalation for other materials being permitted may be applied for the cutters ‘asa special case. by Orelse a separate rate per meter length could be worked out with reference to the actual replacement of the cutters where the degree of hardness is vastly different. This could be known after an analysis of the logs of the working hours, the rate of penetration recorded and the pressure applied on the cutter head Based on the above recommendations of Technical Expert Committee as well asin terms of GO Ms. No. 22, dt. 23.02.2015, it was reported that the agency had worked ‘out and arrived for scrutiny based on considering the difference between the normal and hard rock conditions in financial terms and submitted a claim for extra consumption of power, Staff salaries, lubricants, cutters. The claim is for a length of 740.10 m, The above claim is done for running metre and submitted for rate approval of BoCEs in terms of GO. Ms. No. 63, dt, 12.06.2015 ‘As seen from the above, the agency had submitted claims for the following components, viz: ) Cost of replacement of cutters b) Cost of Power (0) Wear and Tear for each working day 4d) Salaries for Personnel Component€) Other Consumables like Cost of Oils and Lubricants Accordingly, the above subject was placed before Board of Chief Engineers ‘meeting held on 01.03.2016. The BoCEs after detailed discussions have asked for some more clarifications as follows: a) The Expert Committee has suggested only for compensation for rate of increase in replacement of cutters only but nor for other cases. b)_ As per GO 63,the BoCEs have to approve only those rates for which no rate is found in SoR, But in this case, the rate is already finalized and the agency is claiming extra compensation for the which relevancy of said GO is to be examined, ©) To resubmit the test results after obtaining the test results from a centrat agency like GSI. 4d) The BoCEs have also suggested to provide the variation of thrust in case of both normal and abrasive zones. ©) The BoCEs have also requested to present the case duly substantiating with respect to agreement conditions. 4) Further, the BOCEs have requested to present the specifications supplied by TBM manufacturer's viz, variation of rock strata and corresponding penetration rate etc 49) To present the observed data duly certified/verfied by field officers and quality control staff. In reply, the Chief Engineer (P), Ongole, had addressed this office vide his Lr. No. CE&.DWRO/PKM Dist/OGL/DEE2/AEE1/21/2005/VGP/P-I/VoLB dt. 30.04.2016 ‘The same is placed before Board of Chief Engineers (BoCES) in the meeting held on 28-05-2016.The BOCEs have held detailed discussions on the above subject and observed that the daily slow penetration progress of TBM is not only due to encounter of highly abrasive rock but also various other reasons like failure of machine and corresponding repair works, frequency in cutter checkings and replacements and time lapse in between shift changes of staff ete. resulting only 10 to15% operational time in TBM where as the expected operational time is 30 to 35% in a day. This cognizance is taken by BoCEs based Con the report furnished by Geologist Mr. Butchu from Switzertand and also observed that in the Agreement under “Site Inspection” the agency has stated that the profile of rock to be excavated is observed as “Abrasive quartzite” though there is no mention of extent of Abrasivity and also opined that the vital information like actual rate of penetration/day rather than average rate of penetration/day is missing. ‘The BoCEs has requested the CE(P),Ongole, to submit the necessary details as, above along with item-wise justification for each item recommended by him for placing the above matter in the next BoCEs meeting. (Action: E(Project), W.R.Dept., Ongole)Item No. 2 PRED-AP Revised Standard Data- clarification requested regarding output of machinery Used for Water Bound Macadam (Proposed by Engineer-in-Chief(IW)., WR Dept., Hyderabad) The Engineer-in-Chief, PR Department vide reference cited, has observed that there is a discrepancy between output of rollers being adopted by MoRD.MoRTH and AP Standard Data and requested clarifications on the variations in the output for compaction of same type of material as follows: As per MoRD Standard Data: for 360 cum output [ Three Wheel 80-100 KN static roller @ 8 cum | Hour per hour As per MoRTH Standard Data for 360 cum output ‘Smooth 3 wheeled steel roller @ 30 cum per | Hour 1200 hour Vibratory roller 8-10 tonnes @ 60 cum per] Hour 6.00 hour As per AP Standard Data: Three wheel 80-100 EN static roller @ 10 | Hour 36.00 ‘cum per hour for Rual Area Works Three wheel 80-100 KN static roller @ 30 | Hour 12.00 cum per hour for R&B Urban Works Vibratory Roller 8-10 tonnes @ 60 cum per | Hour 600 hour The above issue was discussed in detail in the BoCEs meeting. The BoCEs have recommended that the above issue may be solved by mutual discussions between Panchayat Raj Dept. and R&B Dept. Action : Engineer-in-Chief(PR), P.R. Dept, HyderabadItem No. 3 ValE Report ~ System Improvement Note — Usage of Gravel for Sub Base in road works (Proposed by Engineer-in-Chief, IW,Hyderabad) The Government, Vide reference cited, while forwarding the Vigilance Enforcement recommendations on the above subject matter have requested to place findings and recommendation of Vigilance &Enforcement before Board of Chief Engineers and furnish the action taken report to the Government The following are the V&E Department findings to improve the system DING! L._ As per Indian Soil Classification system, any soil sample that has more than half its weight retained on IS:75 micron sieve is a coarse grained soil If any coarse grained soil has more than half the weight of its coarse fraction retained on 1S sieve 4.75 mm size, itis “Gravel’ denoted by the symbol “G”. 2. Gravel for base course should have very small proportion of fine materials (Silt and Clay) and a relatively larger top sized aggregate for strength and durability. 3. Gravel for surface course should have a relatively higher percentage of fines (Silt land Clay) and relatively smaller top sized aggregate, so as to readily shed off ‘water falling on the surface of the Gravel Road. Where rounded stones are locally available, crushing of such rounded stones is always suggested since the fractured stones embed into the surface of a gravel road much better than the rounded stones. 4, When a single naturally occurring material such as gravel does not meet any one of the specified gradings, soil-Aggregate mixture by blending two or more materials to achieve the required grading may be used for base and surface courses. Soil-Aggregate mixture may be in the form of naturally occurring materials like soil-gravel, or soil purposely blended with suitable aggregate fractions. The primary criteria for acceptability of such materials are plasticity characteristics and gradation. 5. The ‘Atterberg limits’ are a basic measure of the critical water contents of a fine grained soil such as its shrinkage limit, plastic limit and liquid limit. Depending on the water content of the soil it may appear in four states: solid, semi-solid, plastic and liquid, The fines passing through 425-micron sieve shall only be used orconducting the tests as per IS: 2720 (Part 5) 1985. the plasticity index the difference between the liquid limit and the plastic limit 6. Indian Road Congress and MORD have set different specifications for plasticity index of lines for both surface and base courses : As periRC- | As per ic cima 'SP:77-2008, MORD Moist temperate and wet 7 | surface Course | oPical 4-10 | Seasonal wet tropical 615 __| Ari 15.30 is Base Course [<30 6 7. Most of the Engineering Departments viz; PR&ARD, Public Health and Municipal Corporations are proposing to form the base and sub-base layers of the road with Gravel/ Combination of Gravel-Sa agreements, it is specified that the Plasticity index of 1/ Combination of Gravel-Stone dust. in all the fines to be used in base course shall not exceed 6, in accordance with MORD specifications. 8. To assess the Plasticity index of fines available in the region, the Vee Officials have collected two gravel. samples each from the quarries of Aruyolanu and Chinaboinapalil in West Godavari District and got them tested at Quality Control, Laboratory, Panchayat Raj Vig & QC subdivision, Bhimavaram. a) The gradation of the raw gravel samples fairly satisfies the requirement as per clause 2.2.2.2 of IRC: SP: 77-2008, But after blending with sand/ stone dust, the combined samples do not conform to the specification requirement for sub bases, b) The test results revealed that even after blending sand/ stone dust with gravel, the Pl Value is not reducing to the desired values. The reason might be that both the blended material adopted in the tests viz; sand and stone dust are non-plastic. Through the liquid limit is reduced, the plastic limit is also getting reduced owing to non-plastic nature of blended materials, resulting in a minor reduction in Plasticity index value. Further addition of sand/stone dust (>34 %) may lower the Pl value, but the CBR value will get reduced, which is undesirable, 9. A suitable blending material is to be identified, that reduces the Liquid Limit and at the same time increases the Plasticity Limit, so that the Plasticity index of desired value can be achieved.10. When the required results are not obtaining even after blending, stabilization of soil-mixture with time or cement can be resorted to in accordance with clauses 403 and 404 of MORD specifications. 11, Different policies are being adopted by various Engineering Departments in using, gravel as sub base/surlace for road works. i R&B Department has dispensed the usage of gravel as sub base material due its high plasticity index value and water retention properties which adversely affects the overlying bituminous layers leading to its disintegration. However suitable earth for shoulders is being proposed instead of GSB (with gravel a sand /stone dust) in accordance with clause 305' which specifies earth shoulders density not less than 175 KIN/ Cum. But in reality, they are proposing the Gravel quarry at Arugolanu duly specifying the material as suitable earth ii In Panchayat Raj Engineering Department, gravel is stil being used for layering sub base layers for roads duly blending sand or stone dust Granular sub base with HBG Material is adopted in the road works under NCRMP ( National Cycione Risk Mitigation Programme) ii In public Health Engineering and Municipal Fagineering Departments, ‘quarry spall over rolled gravel for road sub bases is being adopted as per 313 C MoRT 81H, 12, The Commissioner, Rural Development, Vide LRNo.1006/EGS/CQCO/2010 DE05-08-2010, instructed that the gradation of gravel shall be at least one of the: gradation specified in IRC: SP-77-2008 and to incorporate the specification in the ‘estimates, working estimates for the works taken up under MGNREGS Grant. 13. It is not advisable to dispense with the usage of Gravel as it is the best locally available economical material. Cost comparison of laying Granular sub base with HBG Material and Gravel-Sand revealed that the construction cost with HBG Material was higher by about 50%, Further, the usage of HBG Material (Stone dust and screenings) increases environmental pollution also. 14. Most of the field engineers opined that even through rotavator is used for mixing of gravel and sand/stone dust, it is not effective in blending Sand/Stone dust to gravel, sample as required in attaining homogeneous mixture as well as the desired PI values. Some of the field engineers opined that Concrete mixture canbe adopted for mixing of gravel and sand / stone dust to achieve perfect blending. RECOMMENDATIONS by VE&D Dept.: The principal Secretary to Government, RE Department, the Principal Secretary to Government, PR&RO Department and the Principal Secretary to Government, Municipal Administration & Urban Development Department, APSecretariat, Hyderabad have requested to instruct the Engineers-in-Chief's concerned to; i. Examine the possibility of adopting the specification for gravel roads in respect of gradation and plasticity index as per SP-77-2008 in lieu of MORD / MoRT & H, iL Inspect the gravel quarties in their jurisdiction periodically for their suitability information of roads and identify a suitable alternative in the event of non conformity to the required specification. The Principal Secretary to Government, Water Resources Department is requested to instruct the Engineers-in-Chief, Water Resources Department to place the subject on the usage of gravel for granular sub bases for road works before the Board of Chief Engineers for finalizing the specifications and for identifying @ suitable blending material with Gravel that is technically and economically viable, in view of Gravel being the best economical and locally available material and it is not advisable to totally dispense with its usage, Bocks members after detailed discussions on the above matter opined that the MoRD specifications are catering to the above requirements of Gravel usage and recommend to adopt MORD specifications for achieving the above purpose. Action : Engineer-in-Chief(IW), W.R. Dept, Hyderabad, Item No.4 Works ~ Departmental Execution of works continuing even after Act ~ Amendment to "D’ Code. (Proposed by Engineer-in-Chief( Irrigation), W.R. Dept, Hyderabad) The Government while forwarding the Director of Works Letter in the reference cited hhas requested to make an amendment for Para-150 of D-code. ‘The Director of Works Accounts has also indicated the reasons for ‘Amendment to Para-150 D-Code which are as follows:-1. Departmental Execution of works by engaging daily labour one of the three methods of execution of works permitted vide Para 150 of D-Code: In this method the required materials are to be purchased /procured by the department and also the labour engaged by the department on muster rolls, 2. (@) Procurement of materials by the department are dispensed with in 1997 ‘onwards. Engagement of labour is prohibited by the Government by Act 2 of 1994 (6) Without purchasing material and without engaging the labour, itis impossible for any official to execute the work departmentally. (©) This position was amplified in U.O Note No.4777/FS/A1/07-2, Finance (WEP) Dept, Dt:24-06-2008, After detailed discussions, the BoCEs have opined that no amendment is required for para 150 of D code and also it need not be dispensed with. The BoCEs, however, recommend that whenever an emergency situation arises, the Department will engage labour through agency. Action : Engineer- }-Chief(Irrigation), W.R. Dept, Hyderabad. Item No. 5 WR Dept ~ E- procurement for works ~ Compulsory registration in AP (Proposed by Engineer-in-Chief, A.W.) The Government in the memo No. 3612/Reforms/Al/2014-1 dt. 24,092015 mentioned that “compulsory registration in the state of AP is usual practice under e- procurement for work being called for tenders in AP. and it is proposed to dispense with the present system and registration in anywhere in the country can be considered as valid for tendering for the works being done and being called for tenders in the state AP" and requested the Engineer ~In-Chief (Irigation), Hyderabad to analyse the pros and cons of the above proposals and furnish a detailed report. In this connection, itis submitted that as per the existing practice + The contractors (Special Class /Class -1) should have contractor registration with Govt of A, for participation in the tenders called for the Govt of AP. + In respect of JV Partners, one of the contractors should have registration and the second one should have been applied for registration + In respect of world bank funded works, contractors registered in any state are eligible to participate in the tenders without registration in AP. + The matter was referred to the Commissioner, COT for placing before the committee of Engineers-In Chief, to express their opinion on the above proposal to enable to submit a detailed report to Govt.The members have discussed the proposal of the Government communicated vide Govt Memo No. 3612/Reforms /A1/2014-1 dated 24-09-2014 to allow the contractor who have registration anywhere in country duly dispensing with the existing practice of registration of contractors in our state After detailed discussions the members have opined that by allowing only the contractors who have got registered in our state, we can know the credentials of the . by placing the said contractors under suspension/ Blacklisting. Finally all the members have contractors and in turn action can be taken against the defaulters i concluded that to continue the existing practice of registration of contractors in our state. Action : ngineer-in-Chief(A.W.), W.R. Dept, Hyderabad Item No. 6 Creation of Deputy Executive Engineer Post in Division office duly suppressing the AE/AEE posts of the Water Resources Department (Proposed by Engineer-in-Chief, A.W.) The Hon'ble Minister for water Resources Department GOAP have endorsed on the copy of the Association of Andhra Pradesh Assistant Executive Engineers representation dated 28-04-2015 in which they are requested for creation of a post of PA to EE. Further the Government vide memo No.207785/Services.1/2016-1 dated 13-05-2016 while enclosing a copy of the Association of Andhra Pradesh Assistant Executive Engineers representation dated 10-05-2016 requested to discuss the said issue before the BOCE’s ‘meeting and submit the remarks /report with specific remarks, ‘The Chief Engineer (Projects), Water Resources Department, Anantapuramu has placed the above issue duly enclosing the AP. Diploma Engineers Association representation dated 23-05-2016 and requested to discuss the issue of creation of Deputy Executive Engineer posts in each Division of Water Resources Department by suppressing the AE/AEE in the divisions. ‘The members have discussed the issue at length. In the water Resources Department the total sanctioned strength of Executive Engineer is 267. Out of this the field divisions in the department is 164 Nos. The BOCE felt that the post of PA to Executive Engineer is necessary in the field divisions to assist the Executive Engineers in Technical matters and also in the Accounts and Administration as the Executive Engineer is an important field functionary; he has to concentrate in the works and also reviews by the higher authorities. Therefore the BOCEs recommends to create a post of PA to Executive Engineer in the cadre of DEE. Finally the members have accepted the above proposal of creation of Deputy Executive Engineer posts in each field Division of Water Resources Department by suppressing the equal number of AE/AEE posts in the department L.164 Divisions.The Water Resources Department is having 3428 AEE/AE posts. After earmarking 164 posts to create the PA to EE posts in the cadre of DEE the net strength of AEE/AE will be (3428-164) 3264 Nos. The financial implication by creating the above post is negligible as there is stagnation in the cadre of AEE/AE. Action : Engineer-i ‘Chief(A.W.), W.R. Dept, Hyderabad tem Ni Water Conservation Mission-Neeru-Chettu sub-mission under primary sector mission-De-silting of tanks Rate for thick jungle clearance with uprooting by ‘machinery- approval of Observed data. (Proposed by Chief Engineer, Minor Irrigation) ‘The Chief Engineer, Minor Irrigation, vide reference cited, has requested to examine the observed data furnished by the SE/IC/Chittoor regarding the rate for clearance of thick Jungle with uprooting by machinery which was not available in the AP-Revised Standard Data, The Chief Engineer, Minor Irrigation, had informed that the Government vide memo.no.10444/CAD.1/2014-57 dt:20.05.2015 has issued orders that the rate for jungle clearance of all government owned water bodies was permitted under neeru-chettu programme as per SSR rates, Further, the Chief Engineer, Minor Irrigation has also informed that during the Video conference held on 02.04.2016,he Superintending Engineer, Irigation Circle, Chittoor has requested for considering observed rate for clearing of jungle grown on the top and slopes of the tank bunds including uprooting which was not available in the resent SSR. Accordingly, the principal Secretary, WR Dept has instructed the Chief Engineer, Minor Irigation to examine the observed data submitted by the Superintending Engineer, Irrigation Circle, Chittoor and submit approved rate for Government for approval Name ofthetank—————SSSSS* Bohan __Cheruiva, Kukalapali, | Yadamari(m), Chittoor(dstrict) | JCB Excavator start time 300 AM JCB Excavator end time ~ | T000AM : | Total time in hours Zhours Hire charges of CB(Market rate) s.700 per one hour Total time taken for removal of | 3 hours Jaulifloraaits cost Mazdoor utilized for burning the removed | 4X1 hr=4 hrs(or) 05 no.s@ 8 hours jaulifloraTotal expenditure incurred 237001055320- Rs1560/ Total quantity removedtin sq mts) Y6.5mx33m-544 5 sqm ‘Average turn out per hour 1560/544.5=Rs.2.87/sqm "Add contractors profit @13.615% R039 [Rate per sam Rs.3.26/sqm Similarly, the observed rate for cutting and removal of Juliflora jungle for the Eira Ganneru Cheruvu Madanapalli(M) is Name of the tank a GanneruCheruvu, Rami “Reddy | palle(}/0}, Ponnetipatem “, Madanapalle(M), Chittoor(distrct | Total time in hours Hire charges of JCB(Market rate) Rs.950 per one hour | Mazdoor utilized for buming the removed [2 no.s@ 8 hours Jauliftora Total expenditure incurred 2x950+2°350=Rs2600/- [Tost quantity removedtn saat) [1100 sqm ‘Average turn out per hour 260/811 =Rs3.21/eqm | Add contractors profit @13615% ——} Rea Rate per sqm RS.3.65/sqm ~ | The unit rate in both the above cases is arived using the same capacity machine ut the parameters ae varying in each case. Taking into consideration, the following dara {5 deduced from both the above cases choosing best parameters as follows us hors Total time in hours Hire charges of ICB(avg, Market rate) (R5.700+Rs.950)/2 = Rs. 825 per one hour | Mazdoor utilized for burning the removed | =11"05/54a5 Jpuliflora® 0.5 Nos. @ Bhrs for clearing | =0.75 Nos. 544.5 acres Total expenditure incurred 2x825+0.75°320=Rs1890/- | | Total quantity removedin sqqamisy | 81 00%qm ‘Average turn out per hour 1890/811=Rs2.33/sqm ‘Add contractors profit @13.615% P5032 Rate per sqm Rs.2.65/sqm‘The BoCEs have discussed the above matter and recommend adopting Rs.2.65/sqm (deduced as above) for thick jungle clearance with uprooting by ‘machinery, Action : Chief Engineer, Minor Irrigation, Hyderabad, HINSS. Project Phase-II-Package No.59/A ~ Approval requested for the observed data for under ground excavation with boomer (Proposed by Chief Engineer, NTR TGP,Tirupathi) ‘The Chief Engineer, NTR TGP, in the letter cited above, has furnished an observed data for the above work and requested to obtain orders from the competent authority. The Chief Engineer, NIRTGP, has further informed that the Superintending Engineer proposed the estimate with underground excavation by conventional method of drilling by deploying driling jumbo as per item (IRR TAW -1 -3) and by this conventional method of drilling the pull that can be achieved generally is around 150 m to 200 m whereas the agency deployed boomers and the net pull can be achieved with boomers is about 300m per blasting and stated that to increase the rate of progress from the possible four faces, utility of boomers is a must. The BoCEs have observed the comparison between the Standard data with that of observed data and found that Drilling Jumbo and Boomer are one and ‘the same and the procedural sequence followed in both the datas are same and hence recommend CE,TGP, to adhere to the data available in Standard Data, Action : Chief Engineer,NTR TGP, Tirupathi Item Ne (Proposed by Engineer-in-Chief, 1.W.) The Technical Advisor, PR& Rural Development have requested to place before Board of Chief Engineers for finalization of initial cost of sand for implementation in all Engineering Departments, The Technical Advisor had also informed that for the works taken up under MGNREGS, the revised rate for cost of sand is worked out by considering the excavation cost by manual labour, loading and unloading charges excluding seigniorage charges and communicated to the MGNREGS staff implementation for spill over works and for the new ‘works from 01.05.2016 onwards. The worked out revised sand rates are as followsSL] Name ofthe | Unit | Excavation | Screening | Loading | Unloading | Cost No | "material [es cest | charges | charges | charges’ | of || | ol 1] Sand for mortar JCum | 6109 | 000 pm 7 fas [one | 2 [Sand For | Cum | 6409 6700 1403 701 }15213 | plastering | [3 [Sand for filing [Cum | e409 000 1403 Tor 5.13 ‘The BoCEs held detailed discussions on the subject and recommend adopting the rate of Rs.85.13/Cum for both "Sand for Mortar” and “Sand for filling” and Rs.152.13/Cum for “Sand for plastering” from the date of 02-Mar-2016 retrospectively on which Government have issued memo on free sand policy. Action : Engineer-in-Chief(IW) Engineer-in-Chief(AW) , WR Dept.& Chairman, Board of Chief Engineers BayANNEXURE: | OFFICERS PRESENT TO THE 2” BOARD OF CHIEF ENGINEERS MEETING DURING ‘THE YEAR 2016 HELD AT 3.00PM ON 28-05-2016 IN THE GODAVARI CONFERENCE HALL OF ENGINEER-IN-CHIEF(Admin), WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, ERRUM. MANZIL: HYDERAL Name ofthe Engineer-in- S.No | chief, ‘/ Chief Engineer Designation, Et Engineer-in-Chief(Admin)& Commissioner COT, Chairman 1 | samv.rovi Kumar suet | 2 samvenkateswara Roo | Engineerin-Chie(rrgation APIP) WR Dept A icunis aam ~ | Engineer-in-Chief(R&B),State 3 [SE MGangadharam | Roads RSW.,Admn Building Hyder 4 | Sivenkata Reddy | Frgineer--Chie(RBB) Rural Roads Hyderabod 3 SmticPadmaja Engineerin-Chit Tbel Welore Deptyderabed 6 [SACVSRama Murty | Ergineer-in-ChiefPR) PR Department, Hyderabad 7 | SriKRavi Babu Engineer-in-< Chief(Admn), RWS Department, Hyderabad @ | ShiD Ramakrishna het Engineer, ISBAWR, WR Dept. iat Chief Engineer Minor Irigationd&Medium Irrigation(FAC), | 9. | siismosabja Meee 10. | SvichSiva Rama Prasad | Chief Engineer North Coast, Visakhapatnam WR Dept. 1 Si kvaradaraju Chief Engineer Projects), Kadapa, WR Dept 12 [SH MGvidhare Reddy | Chief Engineer, CDO, WR Dept 3B | siv.veera Raju Chief Engineer (Projets) Ongole, WR Dept. 14 | Sfxkalandhar Chief Engineer Projets) NSS, Ananthapur, WR Dept. 15. | sriG.cit Babu Chie Engineer Projects) Kurnool WR Dept Sos ‘Chief Engineer Quality Conrol wing for coastal region 16 | sivstamesh sabe | Chee Chief Technical Officer, Vigilance isle (nasil lrhcgca Commission,AP Secretariat 18. | SriRVenkateswara Rao | Chet Engineer(PR) Quality ContolPR Dept, Hyderabad 19 | SmiB Hephzinath Brecuve Engineer PRM Cell WR Dept. 20 | SK Rajesh Dy.Grective Engineer P&M Cell WR Dept q 21 [SHAW Nagendra Kurhar [ ADAO/o ENC (Admin), WR Dept, Hyderabad