Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PART 191
ANNUAL REPORTS, INCIDENT REPORTS AND
SAFETY-RELATED CONDITION REPORTS
(Current through Amendment 22)
PART 192
TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY PIPELINE:
MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
(Current through Amendment 116)
February 2011
PART 191 TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY PIPELINE; ANNUAL REPORTS,
INCIDENT REPORTS, AND SAFETY-RELATED CONDITION REPORTS
NEW FORMAT
For future versions of this manual, changes to the regulations will show highlights for
deletions and underline for additions.
*OPS quit numbering their new amendments. For the purposes of tracking, T&Q is maintaining
a numbering system.
1
Revised 2/11 Current thru 191-22
PART 191 TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY PIPELINE; ANNUAL REPORTS,
INCIDENT REPORTS, AND SAFETY-RELATED CONDITION REPORTS
2
Revised 2/11 Current thru 191-22
PART 191 TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY PIPELINE; ANNUAL REPORTS,
INCIDENT REPORTS, AND SAFETY-RELATED CONDITION REPORTS
3
Revised 2/11 Current thru 191-22
PART 191 TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY PIPELINE; ANNUAL REPORTS,
INCIDENT REPORTS, AND SAFETY-RELATED CONDITION REPORTS
line marking the seaward limit of inland ]191.5 Telephonic notice of certain
waters; incidents. Immediate notice of certain
incidents.
Operator means a person who engages (a) At the earliest practicable moment
in the transportation of gas; following discovery, each operator shall
give notice in accordance with paragraph (b)
Outer Continental Shelf means all of this section of each incident as defined in
submerged lands lying seaward and outside 191.3.
the area of lands beneath navigable waters (b) Each notice required by paragraph
as defined in Section 2 of the Submerged (a) of this section must be made to the
Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1301) and of which National Response Center either by
the subsoil and seabed appertain to the telephone to 800-424-8802 (in Washington,
United States and are subject to its DC, 202 267-2675) or electronically at
jurisdiction and control. http://www.nrc.uscg.mil and must include
the following information: (a) of this section
Person means any individual, firm, joint shall be made by telephone to 800-424-
venture, partnership, corporation, 8802(in Washington, DC, 267-2675) and
association, State, municipality, cooperative shall include the following information:
association, or joint stock association, and (1) Names of operator and person
includes any trustee, receiver, assignee, or making report and their telephone numbers.
personal representative thereof; (2) The location of the incident.
(3) The time of the incident.
Pipeline or Pipeline System means all (4) The number of fatalities and personal
parts of those physical facilities through injuries, if any.
which gas moves in transportation, including (5) All other significant facts that are
but not limited to, pipe, valves, and other known by the operator that are relevant to
appurtenance attached to pipe, compressor the cause of the incident or extent of the
units, metering stations, regulator stations, damages.
delivery station, holders, and fabricated
assemblies. [Part 191 - Org. Jan. 8, 1970, as amended by
Amdt. 191-1, 36 FR 7507, Apr. 2, 1971;
State includes each of the several States, Amdt. 191-4, 47 FR 32719, July 29, 1982;
the District of Columbia, and the Amdt. 191-5, 49 FR 18956, May 3, 1984;
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico; Amdt. 191-8, 54 FR 40878, Oct. 4, 1989;
Amdt. 191-21, 75 FR 72877, Nov. 26, 2010]
Transportation of gas means the
gathering, transmission, or distribution of
gas by pipeline, or the storage of gas in or 191.7 Addressee for written reports.
affecting interstate or foreign commerce. Report submission requirements.
[Part 191 - Org., Jan. 8, 1970, as amended
by Amdt. 191-5, 49 FR 18956, May 3, 1984; (a) General. Except as provided in
Amdt. 191-10, 61 FR 18512, Apr. 26, 1996; paragraph (b) of this section, an operator
Amdt. 191-12, 62 FR 61692, Nov. 19, 1997; must submit each report required by this part
Amdt. 191-15, 68 FR 11748, Mar. 12, 2003; electronically to the Pipeline and Hazardous
Amdt. 191-[18], 70 FR 11135, Mar. 8, 2005, Materials Safety Administration at
Amdt. 191-21, 75 FR 72877, Nov. 26, 2010] http://opsweb.phmsa.dot.gov unless an
4
Revised 2/11 Current thru 191-22
PART 191 TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY PIPELINE; ANNUAL REPORTS,
INCIDENT REPORTS, AND SAFETY-RELATED CONDITION REPORTS
5
Revised 2/11 Current thru 191-22
PART 191 TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY PIPELINE; ANNUAL REPORTS,
INCIDENT REPORTS, AND SAFETY-RELATED CONDITION REPORTS
Department of Transportation Form RSPA F (b) The annual report required by this
7100.1 as soon a practicable but not more section need not be submitted with respect
than 30 days after detection of an incident to:
required to be reported under 191.5. (1) Petroleum gas systems which serve
(b) When additional relevant information fewer than 100 customers from a single
is obtained after the report is submitted source;
under paragraph (a) of this section, the (2) Master meter systems; or
operator shall make supplementary reports (3) LNG facilities.
as deemed necessary with a clear reference
by date and subject to the original report. [Part 191 Org., Jan. 8, 1970, as amended
(c) The incident report required by this by Amdt. 191-2, 37 FR 1173, Jan. 26, 1972;
section need not be submitted with respect Amdt. 191-5, 49 FR 18956, May 3, 1984;
to master meter systems or LNG facilities. Amdt. 191-21, 75 FR 72877, Nov. 26, 2010]
(c) Master meter operators are not
required to submit an incident report as
required by this section. 191.12 Distribution Systems:
Mechanical Fitting Failure Reports
[Part 191 - Org. Jan. 8, 1970, as amended by
Amdt. 191-3, 46 FR 37250, July 20, 1981; Each mechanical fitting failure, as
Amdt. 191-5, 49 FR 18956, May 3, 1984; required by 192.1009, must be submitted
Amdt. 191-21, 75 FR 72877, Nov. 26, 2010] on a Mechanical Fitting Failure Report Form
PHMSA F-
7100.1-2. An operator must submit a
191.11 Distribution system: Annual mechanical fitting failure report for each
report. mechanical fitting failure that occurs within
a calendar year not later than March 15 of
(a) General. Except as provided in the following year (for example, all
paragraph (b) of this section, each operator mechanical failure reports for calendar year
of a distribution pipeline system must 2011 must be submitted no later than March
submit an annual report for that system on 15, 2012). Alternatively, an operator may
DOT Form PHMSA F 7100.1-1. This report elect to submit its reports throughout the
must be submitted each year, not later than year. In addition, an operator must also
March 15, for the preceding calendar year. report this information to the State pipeline
(b) Not required. The annual report safety authority if a State has obtained
requirement in this section does not apply to regulatory authority over the operator's
a master meter system or to a petroleum gas pipeline.
system that serves fewer than 100 customers
from a single source. [Amdt. 191-22, 76 FR 5494, Feb. 1, 2011]
(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b)
of this section, each operator of a
distribution pipeline system shall submit an
annual report for that system on Department
of Transportation Form RSPA F 7100.1-1.
This report must be submitted each year, not
later than March 15, for the preceding
calendar year.
6
Revised 2/11 Current thru 191-22
PART 191 TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY PIPELINE; ANNUAL REPORTS,
INCIDENT REPORTS, AND SAFETY-RELATED CONDITION REPORTS
7
Revised 2/11 Current thru 191-22
PART 191 TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY PIPELINE; ANNUAL REPORTS,
INCIDENT REPORTS, AND SAFETY-RELATED CONDITION REPORTS
that for the 2010 reporting year the report 1996; Amdt. 191-21, 75 FR 72878, Nov.
must be submitted by June 15, 2011. 26,2010]
8
Revised 2/11 Current thru 191-22
PART 191 TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY PIPELINE; ANNUAL REPORTS,
INCIDENT REPORTS, AND SAFETY-RELATED CONDITION REPORTS
[Part 191 - Org., Jan. 8, 1970, as amended operator must notify PHMSA as soon as
by Amdt. 191-5, 49 FR 18956, May 3, 1984; practicable;
Amdt. 191-13, 63 FR 7721, Feb. 17, 1998; (ii) Construction of 10 or more miles of
Amdt. 191-21, 75 FR 72877, Nov. 26, 2010] a new pipeline; or
(iii) Construction of a new LNG plant or
191.22 National Registry of Pipeline and LNG facility.
LNG Operators. (2) An operator must notify PHMSA of
any of the following events not later than 60
(a) OPID Request. Effective January 1, days after the event occurs:
2012, each operator of a gas pipeline, gas (i) A change in the primary entity
pipeline facility, LNG plant or LNG facility responsible (i.e., with an assigned OPID) for
must obtain from PHMSA an Operator managing or administering a safety program
Identification Number (OPID). An OPID is required by this part covering pipeline
assigned to an operator for the pipeline or facilities operated under multiple OPIDs.
pipeline system for which the operator has (ii) A change in the name of the
primary responsibility. To obtain on OPID, operator;
an operator must complete an OPID (iii) A change in the entity (e.g.,
Assignment Request DOT Form PHMSA F company, municipality) responsible for an
1000.1 through the National Registry of existing pipeline, pipeline segment, pipeline
Pipeline and LNG Operators in accordance facility, or LNG facility;
with 191.7. (iv) The acquisition or divestiture of 50
(b) OPID validation. An operator who or more miles of a pipeline or pipeline
has already been assigned one or more system subject to Part 192 of this
OPID by January 1, 2011, must validate the subchapter; or
information associated with each OPID (v) The acquisition or divestiture of an
through the National Registry of Pipeline existing LNG plant or LNG facility subject
and LNG Operators at to Part 193 of this subchapter.
http://opsweb.phmsa.dot.gov, and correct (d) Reporting. An operator must use the
that information as necessary, no later than OPID issued by PHMSA for all reporting
June 30, 2012. requirements covered under this subchapter
(c) Changes. Each operator of a gas and for submissions to the National Pipeline
pipeline, gas pipeline facility, LNG plant or Mapping System.
LNG facility must notify PHMSA
electronically through the National Registry [Amdt. 191-21, 75 FR 72877, Nov. 26,
of Pipeline and LNG Operators at 2010]
http://opsweb.phmsa.dot.gov of certain
events.
(1) An operator must notify PHMSA of 191.23 Reporting safety-related
any of the following events not later than 60 conditions.
days before the event occurs:
(i) Construction or any planned (a) Except as provided in paragraph (b)
rehabilitation, replacement, modification, of this section, each operator shall report in
upgrade, uprate, or update of a facility, other accordance with 191.25 the existence of
than a section of line pipe, that costs $10 any of the following safety-related
million or more. If 60 day notice is not conditions involving facilities in service:
feasible because of an emergency, an
9
Revised 2/11 Current thru 191-22
PART 191 TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY PIPELINE; ANNUAL REPORTS,
INCIDENT REPORTS, AND SAFETY-RELATED CONDITION REPORTS
(1) In the case of a pipeline (other than of operation of a pipeline or an LNG facility
an LNG facility) that operates at a hoop that contains or processes gas or LNG.
stress of 20 percent or more of its specified (b) A report is not required for any
minimum yield strength, general corrosion safety-related condition that
that has reduced the wall thickness to less (1) Exists on a master meter system or a
than that required for the maximum customer-owned service line;
allowable operating pressure, and localized (2) Is an incident or results in an incident
corrosion pitting to a degree where leakage before the deadline for filing the safety-
might result. related condition report;
(2) Unintended movement or abnormal (3) Exists on a pipeline (other than an
loading by environmental causes, such as an LNG facility) that is more than 220 yards
earthquake, landslide, or flood, that impairs (200 meters) from any building intended for
the serviceability of a pipeline or the human occupancy or outdoor place of
structural integrity or reliability of an LNG assembly, except that reports are required
facility that contains, controls, or processes for conditions within the right-of-way of an
gas or LNG. active railroad, paved road, street, or
(3) Any crack or other material defect highway; or
that impairs the structural integrity or (4) Is corrected by repair or replacement
reliability of an LNG facility that contains, in accordance with applicable safety
controls, or processes gas or LNG. standards before the deadline for filing the
(4) Any material defect or physical safety-related condition report, except that
damage that impairs the serviceability of a reports are required for conditions under
pipeline that operates at a hoop stress of 20 paragraph (a)(1) of this section other than
percent or more of its specified minimum localized corrosion pitting on an effectively
yield strength. coated and cathodically protected pipeline.
(5) Any malfunction or operating error
that causes the pressure of a pipeline or [Amdt. 191-6, 53 FR 24942, July 1, 1988;
LNG facility that contains or processes gas Amdt. 191-14, 63 FR 37500, July 13, 1998]
or LNG to rise above its maximum
allowable operating pressure (or working
pressure for LNG facilities) plus the build- 191.25 Filing safety-related condition
up allowed for operation of pressure limiting reports.
or control devices.
(6) A leak in a pipeline or LNG facility (a) Each report of a safety-related
that contains or processes gas or LNG that condition under 191.23(a) must be filed
constitutes an emergency. (received by the Associate Administrator,
(7) Inner tank leakage, ineffective OPS) in writing within five working days
insulation, or frost heave that impairs the (not including Saturday, Sunday, or Federal
structural integrity of an LNG Holidays) after the day a representative of
storage tank. the operator first determines that the
(8) Any safety-related condition that condition exists, but not later than 10
could lead to an imminent hazard and causes working days after the day a representative
(either directly or indirectly by remedial of the operator discovers the condition.
action of the operator), for purposes other Separate conditions may be described in a
than abandonment, a 20 percent or more single report if they are closely related.
reduction in operating pressure or shutdown
10
Revised 2/11 Current thru 191-22
PART 191 TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY PIPELINE; ANNUAL REPORTS,
INCIDENT REPORTS, AND SAFETY-RELATED CONDITION REPORTS
11
Revised 2/11 Current thru 191-22
PART 192 TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY PIPELINE:
MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
NEW FORMAT
For future versions of this manual, changes to the regulations will show a
highlight for deletions and an underline for additions.
*OPS quit numbering their new amendments for a period of time. For the purposes of tracking,
T&Q is maintaining a numbering system.
Copies of 49 CFR Parts 190 through 199 and Part 40 are available for download at:
http://www.phmsa.dot.gov.
Appendix A [Reserved]
Gulf of Mexico and its inlets means the Maximum allowable operating pressure
waters from the mean high water mark of (MAOP) means the maximum pressure at
the coast of the Gulf of Mexico and its in- which a pipeline or segment of a pipeline
lets open to the sea (excluding rivers, tidal may be operated under this part.
marshes, lakes, and canals) seaward to in-
clude the territorial sea and Outer Continen- Municipality means a city, county, or
tal Shelf to a depth of 15 feet (4.6 meters), any other political subdivision of a State.
as measured from the mean low water.
Offshore means beyond the line of ordi-
Hazard to navigation means, for the nary low water along that portion of the
purpose of this part, a pipeline where the coast of the United States that is in direct
top of the pipe is less than 12 inches (305 contact with the open seas and beyond the
Revision 4/09 Current thru 192-110 10/157
PART 192 TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY PIPELINE:
MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
line marking the seaward limit of inland wa- Pipeline facility means new and exist-
ters. ing pipeline, rights-of-way, and any equip-
ment, facility, or building used in the trans-
Operator means a person who engages portation of gas or in the treatment of gas
in the transportation of gas. during the course of transportation.
Outer Continental Shelf means all sub- Service Line means a distribution line
merged lands lying seaward and outside the that transports gas from a common source of
area of lands beneath navigable waters as supply to an individual customer, to two ad-
defined in Section 2 of the Submerged jacent or adjoining residential or small
Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1301) and of which commercial customers, or to multiple resi-
the subsoil and seabed appertain to the Unit- dential or small commercial customers
ed States and are subject to its jurisdiction served through a meter header or manifold.
and control. A service line ends at the outlet of the cus-
tomer meter or at the connection to a cus-
Person means any individual, firm, joint tomer's piping, whichever is further down-
venture, partnership, corporation, associa- stream, or at the connection to customer pip-
tion, State, municipality, cooperative associ- ing if there is no meter.
ation, or joint stock association, and includ-
ing any trustee, receiver, assignee, or per- Service regulator means the device on a
sonal representative thereof. service line that controls the pressure of gas
delivered from a higher pressure to the
Petroleum gas means propane, propyl- pressure provided to the customer. A ser-
ene, butane, (normal butane or isobutanes), vice regulator may serve one customer or
and butylene (including isomers), or mix- multiple customers through a meter header
tures composed predominantly of these gas- or manifold.
es, having a vapor pressure not exceeding
208 psi (1434 kPa) at 100 F (38 C). SMYS means specified minimum yield
strength is:
Pipe means any pipe or tubing used in (a) For steel pipe manufactured in accor-
the transportation of gas, including pipe- dance with a listed specification, the yield
type holders. strength specified as a minimum in that spe-
cification; or
Pipeline means all parts of those physi- (b) For steel pipe manufactured in ac-
cal facilities through which gas moves in cordance with an unknown or unlisted speci-
transportation, including pipe, valves, and fication, the yield strength determined in
other appurtenance attached to pipe, com- accordance with 192.107(b)
pressor units, metering stations, regulator
stations, delivery stations, holders, and fa- State means each of the several States,
bricated assemblies. the District of Columbia, and the Common-
wealth of Puerto Rico.
Pipeline environment includes soil re-
sistivity (high or low), soil moisture (wet or Supervisory Control and Data Acquisi-
dry), soil contaminants that may promote tion (SCADA) system means a computer-
corrosive activity, and other known condi- based system or systems used by a controller
tions that could affect the probability of ac- in a control room that collects and displays
tive corrosion. information about a pipeline facility and
(4) NFPA 70 (20085) National Electrical Code (NEC 2008) (Ap- 192.163(e); 192.189(c).
proved August 15, 2007).
G. Plastics Pipe Institute, Inc. (PPI): 192.121.
(1) PPI TR-3/2008 HDB/HDS/PDB/SDB/MRS Policies (2008), Pol-
icies and Procedures for Developing Hydrostatic Design Basis (HDB),
Pressure Design Basis (PDB), Strength Design Basis (SDB), and Mini-
mum Required Strength (MRS) Ratings for Thermoplastic Piping Mate-
rials or Pipe (May 2008).PPI TR-3/2004 (2004) Policies and Procedures
for Developing Hydrostatic Design Bases (HDB), Pressure Design Bases
(PDB), Strength Design Basis (SDB), and Minimum Required Strength
(MRS) Ratings for Thermoplastic Piping Materials or Pipe..
H. NACE International (NACE): 192.923(b)(1); 192.925(b) Intro-
(1) NACE Standard SP0502-2008, Standard Practice,RP-0502-2002 ductory text; 192.925(b)(1);
Pipeline External Corrosion Direct Assessment Methodology (reaf- 192.925(b)(1)(ii); 192.925(b)(2) Intro-
firmed March 20, 2008). ductory text; 192.925(b)(3) Introduc-
tory text; 192.925(b)(3)(ii);
192.925(b)(3)(iv); 192.925(b)(4) In-
troductory text; 192.925(b)(4)(ii);
192.931(d); 192.935(b)(1)(iv);
192.939(a)(2).
I. Gas Technology Institute (GTI):(Formerly Gas Research Institute): 192.927(c)(2); 192.7.
(1) GRI 02/0057 (2002) Internal Corrosion Direct Assessment of Gas
Transmission PipelinesMethodology .
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended 28, 2008; Amdt. 192-[107], 73 FR 62147, Oc-
by Amdt. 192-37, 46 FR 10157, Feb. 2, tober 17, 2008; Amdt. 192-[109], 74 FR 2889,
1981; Amdt. 192-51, 51 FR 15333, Apr. 23, January 16, 2009; Amdt. 192-[110], 74 FR
1986; Amdt. 192-68, 58 FR, 14519, Mar. 17099, April 14, 2009: Amdt. 192-112, 74 FR
18, 1993; Amdt. 192-78, 61 FR 28770, June 63310, Dec. 3, 2009; Amdt. 192-114, 74 FR
6, 1996; Amdt. 192-94, 69 FR 32886, June 48593, Aug 11, 2010]
14, 2004; Amdt. 192-94A, 69 FR 54591,
Sept. 9, 2004; 70 FR 11135, Mar. 8, 2005;
Amdt. 192-99, 70 FR 28833, May 19, 2005,
Amdt. 192-102, 71 FR 13289, Mar. 15,
2006; Amdt. 192-103, 71 FR 33402, June 8,
2006; Amdt. 192-103c, 72 FR 4655, Feb. 1,
2007; Amdt. 192-[106], 73 FR 16562, Mar.
192.8 How are onshore gathering lines (2) The endpoint of gathering, under sec-
and regulated onshore gathering lines tion 2.2(a)(1)(A) of API RP 80, may not extend
determined? beyond the first downstream natural gas
processing plant, unless the operator can dem-
(a) An operator must use API RP 80 (in- onstrate, using sound engineering principles,
corporated by reference, see 192.7), to de- that gathering extends to a further downstream
termine if an onshore pipeline (or part of a plant.
connected series of pipelines) is an onshore (3) If the endpoint of gathering, under sec-
gathering line. The determination is subject tion 2.2(a)(1)(C) of API RP 80, is determined
to the limitations listed below. After making by the commingling of gas from separate pro-
this determination, an operator must deter- duction fields, the fields may not be more than
mine if the onshore gathering line is a regu- 50 miles from each other, unless the Adminis-
lated onshore gathering line under paragraph trator finds a longer separation distance is justi-
(b) of this section. fied in a particular case (see 49 CFR 190.9).
(1) The beginning of gathering, under (4) The endpoint of gathering, under sec-
section 2.2(a)(1) of API RP 80, may not ex- tion 2.2(a)(1)(D) of API RP 80, may not extend
tend beyond the furthermost downstream beyond the furthermost downstream compres-
point in a production operation as defined in sor used to increase gathering line pressure for
section 2.3 of API RP 80. This furthermost delivery to another pipeline.
downstream point does not include equip- (b) For purposes of 192.9, regulated on-
ment that can be used in either production or shore gathering line'' means:
transportation, such as separators or dehy- (1) Each onshore gathering line (or segment
drators, unless that equipment is involved in of onshore gathering line) with a feature de-
the processes of production and preparation scribed in the second column that lies in an
for transportation or delivery of hydrocarbon area described in the third column; and
gas'' within the meaning of production op- (2) As applicable, additional lengths of line
eration.'' described in the fourth column to provide a safety buf-
fer:
(2) If the pipeline is metallic, control corro- shore gathering line, the operator has 1 year for
sion according to requirements of subpart I of Type B lines and 2 years for Type A lines after
this part applicable to transmission lines; the line becomes a regulated onshore gathering
(3) Carry out a damage prevention program line to comply with this section.
under 192.614;
(4) Establish a public education program [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended by
under 192.616; Amdt. 192-72, 59 FR 17281, April 12, 1994;
(5) Establish the MAOP of the line under Amdt. 192-95B, 69 FR 18227, April 6, 2004,
192.619; and Amdt. 192-102, 71 FR 13289, Mar. 15, 2006]
(6) Install and maintain line markers ac-
cording to the requirements for transmission
lines in 192.707. 192.10 Outer continental shelf pipelines.
(e) Compliance deadlines. An operator of a
regulated onshore gathering line must comply Operators of transportation pipelines on the
with the following deadlines, as applicable. Outer Continental Shelf (as defined in the Out-
(1) An operator of a new, replaced, relo- er Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C.
cated, or otherwise changed line must be in 1331) must identify on all their respective
compliance with the applicable requirements of pipelines the specific points at which operating
this section by the date the line goes into ser- responsibility transfers to a producing operator.
vice, unless an exception in 192.13 applies. For those instances in which the transfer points
(2) If a regulated onshore gathering line ex- are not identifiable by a durable marking, each
isting on April 14, 2006 was not previously operator will have until September 15, 1998 to
subject to this part, an operator has until the identify the transfer points. If it is not practic-
date stated in the second column to comply able to durably mark a transfer point and the
with the applicable requirement for the line transfer point is located above water, the opera-
listed in the first column, unless the Adminis- tor must depict the transfer point on a schemat-
trator finds a later deadline is justified in a par- ic located near the transfer point. If a transfer
ticular case: point is located subsea, then the operator must
identify the transfer point on a schematic
Requirement Compliance dead- which must be maintained at the nearest up-
line stream facility and provided to PHMSA upon
Control corrosion accord- April 15, 2009.
request. For those cases in which adjoining
ing to Subpart I require-
ments for transmission operators have not agreed on a transfer point
lines. by September 15, 1998 the Regional Director
Carry out a damage pre- October 15, 2007. and the MMS Regional Supervisor will make a
vention program under joint determination of the transfer point.
192.614.
Establish MAOP under October 15, 2007.
192.619 [Amdt. 192-81, 62 FR 61692, Nov. 19, 1997;
Install and maintain line April 15, 2008. 70 FR 11135, Mar. 8, 2005]
markers under 192.707.
Establish a public educa- April 15, 2008.
tion program under 192.11 Petroleum gas systems.
192.616.
Other provisions of this April 15, 2009.
part as required by para- (a) Each plant that supplies petroleum gas
graph (c) of this section by pipeline to a natural gas distribution system
for Type A lines. must meet the requirements of this part and
ANSI/NFPA 58 and 59.
(3) If, after April 14, 2006, a change in class (b) Each pipeline system subject to this part
location or increase in dwelling density causes that transports only petroleum gas or petroleum
an onshore gathering line to be a regulated on-
gas/air mixtures must meet the requirements of apply until April 14, 2006.
this part and of ANSI/NFPA 58 and 59. All other pipelines. November 12,
1970.
(c) In the event of a conflict between this
part and ANSI/NFPA 58 and 59, ANSI/NFPA
58 and 59 prevail. (c) Each operator shall maintain, modify as
appropriate, and follow the plans, procedures,
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended by and programs that it is required to establish
Amdt. 192-68, 58 FR 14519, Mar. 18, 1993; under this part.
Amdt. 192-75, 61 FR 18512, Apr. 26, 1996;
Amdt. 192-78, 61 FR 28770, June 6, 1996] [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended by
Amdt. 192-27, 41 FR 34598, Aug. 16, 1976;
Amdt. 192-30, 42 FR 60146, Nov. 25, 1977,
192.12 [Removed] Amdt. 192-102, 71 FR 13289, Mar. 15, 2006]
192.109 Nominal wall thickness (t) for (1) Crosses the right-of-way of an unim-
steel pipe. proved public road, without a casing;
(2) Crosses without a casing, or makes a
(a) If the nominal wall thickness for steel parallel encroachment on, the right-of-way of
pipe is not known, it is determined by measur- either a hard surfaced road, a highway, a public
ing the thickness of each piece of pipe at quar- street, or a railroad;
ter points on one end. (3) Is supported by a vehicular, pedestrian,
(b) However, if the pipe is of uniform railroad, or pipeline bridge; or
grade, size, and thickness and there are more (4) Is used in a fabricated assembly, (in-
than 10 lengths, only 10 percent of the individ- cluding separators, mainline valve assemblies,
ual lengths, but not less than 10 lengths, need cross-connections, and river crossing headers)
be measured. The thickness of the lengths that or is used within five pipe diameters in any di-
are not measured must be verified by applying rection from the last fitting of a fabricated as-
a gauge set to the minimum thickness found by sembly, other than a transition piece or an el-
the measurement. The nominal wall thickness bow used in place of a pipe bend which is not
to be used in the design formula in 192.105 is associated with a fabricated assembly.
the next wall thickness found in commercial (c) For Class 2 locations, a design factor of
specifications that is below the average of all 0.50, or less, must be used in the design formu-
the measurements taken. However, the nomin- la in 192.105 for uncased steel pipe that
al wall thickness used may not be more than crosses the right-of-way of a hard surfaced
1.14 times the smallest measurement taken on road, a highway, a public street, or a railroad.
pipe less than 20 inches (508 millimeters) in (d) For Class 1 and Class 2 locations, a de-
outside diameter, nor more than 1.11 times the sign factor of 0.50, or less, must be used in the
smallest measurement taken on pipe 20 inches design formula in 192.105 for
(508 millimeters) or more in outside diameter. (1) Steel pipe in a compressor station, regu-
lating station, or measuring station, and
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended by (2) Steel pipe, including a pipe riser, on a
Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13, 1998] platform located offshore or in inland naviga-
ble waters.
192.111 Design factor (F) for steel pipe. [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended by
Amdt. 192-27, 41 FR 34598, Aug. 16, 1976]
(a) Except as otherwise provided in para-
graphs (b), (c), and (d) of this section, the de-
sign factor to be used in the design formula in 192.112 Additional design requirements
192.105 is determined in accordance with the for steel pipe using alternative maximum al-
following table: lowable operating pressure.
Class location Design factor (F) For a new or existing pipeline segment to be
1 0.72 eligible for operation at the alternative maxi-
2 0.60 mum allowable operating pressure (MAOP)
3 0.50
calculated under 192.620, a segment must
4 0.40
meet the following additional design require-
ments. Records for alternative MAOP must be
(b) A design factor of 0.60 or less must be
maintained, for the useful life of the pipeline,
used in the design formula in 192.105 for
demonstrating compliance with these require-
steel pipe in Class 1 locations that:
ments:
To address this design is- The pipeline segment must meet these additional requirements:
sue:
(a) General standards for (1) The plate, skelp, or coil used for the pipe must be micro-alloyed, fine grain, fully
the steel pipe. killed, continuously cast steel with calcium treatment.
(2) The carbon equivalents of the steel used for pipe must not exceed 0.25 percent by
weight, as calculated by the Ito-Bessyo formula (Pcm formula) or 0.43 percent by
weight, as calculated by the International Institute of Welding (IIW) formula.
(3) The ratio of the specified outside diameter of the pipe to the specified wall thick-
ness must be less than 100. The wall thickness or other mitigative measures must pre-
vent denting and ovality anomalies during construction, strength testing and antic-
ipated operational stresses.
(4) The pipe must be manufactured using API Specification 5L, product specification
level 2 (incorporated by reference, see 192.7) for maximum operating pressures and
minimum and maximum operating temperatures and other requirements under this
section.
(b) Fracture control. (1) The toughness properties for pipe must address the potential for initiation, propa-
gation and arrest of fractures in accordance with:
(i) API Specification 5L (incorporated by reference, see 192.7); or
(ii) American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) B31.8 (incorporated by
reference, see 192.7); and
(iii) Any correction factors needed to address pipe grades, pressures, tempera-
tures, or gas compositions not expressly addressed in API Specification 5L, prod-
uct specification level 2 or ASME B31.8 (incorporated by reference, see 192.7).
(2) Fracture control must:
(i) Ensure resistance to fracture initiation while addressing the full range of oper-
ating temperatures, pressures, gas compositions, pipe grade and operating stress
levels, including maximum pressures and minimum temperatures for shut-in con-
ditions, that the pipeline is expected to experience. If these parameters change
during operation of the pipeline such that they are outside the bounds of what was
considered in the design evaluation, the evaluation must be reviewed and updated
to assure continued resistance to fracture initiation over the operating life of the
pipeline;
(ii) Address adjustments to toughness of pipe for each grade used and the decom-
pression behavior of the gas at operating parameters;
(iii) Ensure at least 99 percent probability of fracture arrest within eight pipe
lengths with a probability of not less than 90 percent within five pipe lengths;
and(iv) Include fracture toughness testing that is equivalent to that described in
supplementary requirements SR5A, SR5B, and SR6 of API Specification 5L (in-
corporated by reference, see 192.7) and ensures ductile fracture and arrest with
the following exceptions:
(A) The results of the Charpy impact test prescribed in SR5A must indicate
at least 80 percent minimum shear area for any single test on each heat of
steel; and
(B) The results of the drop weight test prescribed in SR6 must indicate 80
percent average shear area with a minimum single test result of 60 percent
shear area for any steel test samples. The test results must ensure a ductile
fracture and arrest.
(3) If it is not physically possible to achieve the pipeline toughness properties of para-
graphs (b)(1) and (2) of this section, additional design features, such as mechanical or
composite crack arrestors and/or heavier walled pipe of proper design and spacing,
must be used to ensure fracture arrest as described in paragraph (b)(2)(iii) of this sec-
tion.
(c) Plate/coil quality con- (1) There must be an internal quality management program at all mills involved in
trol. producing steel, plate, coil, skelp, and/or rolling pipe to be operated at alternative
MAOP. These programs must be structured to eliminate or detect defects and inclu-
sions affecting pipe quality.
(2) A mill inspection program or internal quality management program must include
(i) and either (ii) or (iii):
(i) An ultrasonic test of the ends and at least 35 percent of the surface of the
plate/coil or pipe to identify imperfections that impair serviceability such as lami-
nations, cracks, and inclusions. At least 95 percent of the lengths of pipe manu-
factured must be tested. For all pipelines designed after December 22November
17, 2008, the test must be done in accordance with ASTM A578/A578M Level B,
or API 5L Paragraph 7.8.10 (incorporated by reference, see 192.7) or equivalent
method, and either
(ii) A macro etch test or other equivalent method to identify inclusions that may
form centerline segregation during the continuous casting process. Use of sulfur
prints is not an equivalent method. The test must be carried out on the first or
second slab of each sequence graded with an acceptance criteria of one or two on
the Mannesmann scale or equivalent; or
(iii) A quality assurance monitoring program implemented by the operator that
includes audits of: (a) all steelmaking and casting facilities, (b) quality control
plans and manufacturing procedure specifications, (c) equipment maintenance
and records of conformance, (d) applicable casting superheat and speeds, and (e)
centerline segregation monitoring records to ensure mitigation of centerline se-
gregation during the continuous casting process.
(d) Seam quality control. (1) There must be a quality assurance program for pipe seam welds to assure tensile
strength provided in API Specification 5L (incorporated by reference, see 192.7) for
appropriate grades.
(2) There must be a hardness test, using Vickers (Hv10) hardness test method or
equivalent test method, to assure a maximum hardness of 280 Vickers of the follow-
ing:
(i) A cross section of the weld seam of one pipe from each heat plus one pipe
from each welding line per day; and
(ii) For each sample cross section, a minimum of 13 readings (three for each heat
affected zone, three in the weld metal, and two in each section of pipe base met-
al).
(3) All of the seams must be ultrasonically tested after cold expansion and mill hy-
drostatic testing.
(e) Mill hydrostatic test. (1) All pipe to be used in a new pipeline segment must be hydrostatically tested at the
mill at a test pressure corresponding to a hoop stress of 95 percent SMYS for 10
seconds. The test pressure may include a combination of internal test pressure and the
allowance for end loading stresses imposed by the pipe mill hydrostatic testing
equipment as allowed by API Specification 5L, Appendix K (incorporated by refer-
ence, see 192.7).
(2) Pipe in operation prior to December 22November 17, 2008, must have been hy-
drostatically tested at the mill at a test pressure corresponding to a hoop stress of 90
percent SMYS for 10 seconds.
(f) Coating. (1) The pipe must be protected against external corrosion by a non- shielding coating.
(2) Coating on pipe used for trenchless installation must be non- shielding and resist
abrasions and other damage possible during installation.
(3) A quality assurance inspection and testing program for the coating must cover the
surface quality of the bare pipe, surface cleanliness and chlorides, blast cleaning, ap-
plication temperature control, adhesion, cathodic disbondment, moisture permeation,
bending, coating thickness, holiday detection, and repair.
(g) Fittings and flanges. (1) There must be certification records of flanges, factory induction bends and factory
weld ells. Certification must address material properties such as chemistry, minimum
yield strength and minimum wall thickness to meet design conditions.
(2) If the carbon equivalents of flanges, bends and ells are greater than 0.42 percent
by weight, the qualified welding procedures must include a pre-heat procedure.
(3) Valves, flanges and fittings must be rated based upon the required specification
rating class for the alternative MAOP.
(h) Compressor stations. (1) A compressor station must be designed to limit the temperature of the nearest
downstream segment operating at alternative MAOP to a maximum of 120 degrees
Fahrenheit (49 degrees Celsius) or the higher temperature allowed in paragraph (h)(2)
of this section unless a long-term coating integrity monitoring program is imple-
mented in accordance with paragraph (h)(3) of this section.
(2) If research, testing and field monitoring tests demonstrate that the coating type
being used will withstand a higher temperature in long-term operations, the compres-
sor station may be designed to limit downstream piping to that higher temperature.
Test results and acceptance criteria addressing coating adhesion, cathodic disbond-
ment, and coating condition must be provided to each PHMSA pipeline safety region-
al office where the pipeline is in service at least 60 days prior to operating above 120
degrees Fahrenheit (49 degrees Celsius). An operator must also notify a State pipeline
safety authority when the pipeline is located in a State where PHMSA has an inter-
state agent agreement, or an intrastate pipeline is regulated by that State.
(3) Pipeline segments operating at alternative MAOP may operate at temperatures
above 120 degrees Fahrenheit (49 degrees Celsius) if the operator implements a long-
term coating integrity monitoring program. The monitoring program must include
examinations using direct current voltage gradient (DCVG), alternating current vol-
tage gradient (ACVG), or an equivalent method of monitoring coating integrity. An
operator must specify the periodicity at which these examinations occur and criteria
for repairing identified indications. An operator must submit its long- term coating
integrity monitoring program to each PHMSA pipeline safety regional office in which
the pipeline is located for review before the pipeline segments may be operated at
temperatures in excess of 120 degrees Fahrenheit (49 degrees Celsius). An operator
must also notify a State pipeline safety authority when the pipeline is located in a
State where PHMSA has an interstate agent agreement, or an intrastate pipeline is
regulated by that State.
cies, (incorporated by reference, (b) Plastic pipe may not be used where op-
see 192.7). For reinforced thermo- erating temperatures of the pipe will be:
setting plastic pipe, 11,000 psig (1) Below -20F (-29C), or -40 F (-40 C)
(75,842 kPa). [Note: Arithmetic in- if all pipe and pipeline components whose op-
terpolation is not allowed for PA-11 erating temperature will be below -20 F (-
pipe.] 29 C) have a temperature rating by the manu-
t= Specified wall thickness, mm facturer consistent with that operating tempera-
(in.)inches (mm). ture; or
D = Specified outside diameter, mm (2) Above the following applicable temper-
(in.)inches (mm). atures:
SDR = Standard dimension ratio, the ratio (i) For thermoplastic pipe, the temperature
of the average specified outside di- at which the HDB used in the design formula
ameter to the minimum specified under 192.121 is determined.
wall thickness, corresponding to a (ii) For reinforced thermosetting plastic
value from a common numbering pipe, 150 F (66 C).
system that was derived from the (c) The wall thickness for thermoplastic
American National Standards Insti- pipe may not be less than 0.062 inch (1.57 mil-
tute preferred number series 10. limeters).
DF = 0.32 or (d) The wall thickness for reinforced ther-
= 0.40 for PA-11 pipe produced after mosetting plastic pipe may not be less than that
January 23, 2009 with a nominal pipe listed in the following table:
size (IPS or CTS) 4-inch or less, and a Normal size in inches Minimum wall thick-
SDR of 11 or greater (i.e. thicker pipe (millimeters) ness in inches (millime-
wall)nominal pipe size (IPS or CTS) 4- ters)
inch or less, SDR-11 or greater (i.e. 2 (51) 0.060 (1.52)
3 (76) 0.060 (1.52)
thicker pipe wall), PA-11 pipe produced
4 (102) 0.070 (1.78)
after January 23, 2009. 6 (152) 0.100 (2.54)
Subpart DDesign of Pipeline exists which might impair the strength or tight-
Components ness of the component; and
(b) The edition of the document under
which the component was manufactured has
192.141 Scope. equal or more stringent requirements for the
following as an edition of that document cur-
This subpart prescribes minimum require- rently or previously listed in 192.7 or Appen-
ments for the design and installation of pipe- dix B of this part:
line components and facilities. In addition, it (1) Pressure testing;
prescribes requirements relating to protection (2) Materials; and,
against accidental overpressuring. (3) Pressure and temperature ratings.
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970] [Amdt. 192-45, 48 FR 30637, July 5, 1983;
Amdt. 192-94, 69 FR 32886, June 14, 2004]
(c) Each valve must be able to meet the an- and be cast integrally with the pipe, valve, or
ticipated operating conditions. fitting.
(d) No valve having shell (body, bonnet, [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended by
cover, and/or end flange) components made of Amdt. 192-62, 54 FR 5625, Feb. 6, 1989;
ductile iron may be used at pressures exceed- Amdt. 192-68, 54 FR 14519, Mar. 18, 1993]
ing 80 percent of the pressure ratings for com-
parable steel valves at their listed temperature.
However, a valve having shell components 192.149 Standard fittings.
made of ductile iron may be used at pressures
up to 80 percent of the pressure ratings for (a) The minimum metal thickness of
comparable steel valves at their listed tempera- threaded fittings may not be less than specified
ture, if: for the pressures and temperatures in the appli-
(1) The temperature-adjusted service pres- cable standards referenced in this part, or their
sure does not exceed 1,000 psi (7 MPa) gage; equivalent.
and (b) Each steel butt-welding fitting must
(2) Welding is not used on any ductile iron have pressure and temperature ratings based on
component in the fabrication of the valve shells stresses for pipe of the same or equivalent ma-
or their assembly. terial. The actual bursting strength of the fit-
(e) No valve having shell (body, bonnet, ting must at least equal the computed bursting
cover, and/or end flange) components made of strength of pipe of the designated material and
cast iron, malleable iron, orpressure containing wall thickness, as determined by a prototype
parts made of ductile iron may be used in the that was tested to at least the pressure required
gas pipe components of compressor stations. for the pipeline to which it is being added.
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19,1970, as amended by [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970]
Amdt. 192-3, 35 FR 17660, Nov. 17, 1970;
Amdt. 192-22, 41 FR 13590, Mar. 31, 1976;
Amdt. 192-37, 46 FR 10159, Feb. 2, 1981; 192.150 Passage of internal inspection de-
Amdt. 192-62, 54 FR 5625, Feb. 6, 1989; vices.
Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13, 1998;
Amdt. 192-94, 69 FR 32886, June 14, 2004; (a) Except as provided in paragraphs (b)
Amdt. 192-103, 71 FR 33402, June 8, 2006; and (c) of this section, each new transmission
Amdt. 192-114, 74 FR 48593, Aug 11, 2010] line and each replacement of line pipe, valve,
fitting, or other line component in a transmis-
sion line must be designed and constructed to
192.147 Flanges and flange accessories. accommodate the passage of instrumented in-
ternal inspection devices.
(a) Each flange or flange accessory (other (b) This section does not apply to:
than cast iron) must meet the minimum re- (1) Manifolds;
quirements of ASME/ ANSI B16.5, MSS SP- (2) Station piping such as at compressor
44, or the equivalent. stations, meter stations, or regulator stations;
(b) Each flange assembly must be able to (3) Piping associated with storage facilities,
withstand the maximum pressure at which the other than a continuous run of transmission
pipeline is to be operated and to maintain its line between a compressor station and storage
physical and chemical properties at any tem- facilities;
perature to which it is anticipated that it might (4) Cross-overs;
be subjected in service. (5) Sizes of pipe for which an instrumented
(c) Each flange on a flanged joint in cast internal inspection device is not commercially
iron pipe must conform in dimensions, drilling, available;
face and gasket design to ASME/ANSI B16.1
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended by 192.161 Supports and anchors.
Amdt. 192-3, 35 FR 17660, Nov. 17, 1970;
Amdt. 192-68, 58 FR 14519, Mar. 18, 1993; (a) Each pipeline and its associated equip-
Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13, 1998 ] ment must have enough anchors or supports to:
(1) Prevent undue strain on connected
equipment;
192.155 Welded branch connections. (2) Resist longitudinal forces caused by a
bend or offset in the pipe; and,
Each welded branch connection made to (3) Prevent or damp out excessive vibra-
pipe in the form of a single connection, or in a tion.
header or manifold as a series of connections, (b) Each exposed pipeline must have
must be designed to ensure that the strength of enough supports or anchors to protect the ex-
the pipeline system is not reduced, taking into posed pipe joints from the maximum end force
account the stresses in the remaining pipe wall caused by internal pressure and any additional
due to the opening in the pipe or header, the forces caused by temperature expansion or
shear stresses produced by the pressure acting contraction or by the weight of the pipe and its
on the area of the branch opening, and any ex- contents.
ternal loadings due to thermal movement, (c) Each support or anchor on an exposed
weight, and vibration. pipeline must be made of durable, noncom-
bustible material and must be designed and in-
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970] stalled as follows:
(1) Free expansion and contraction of the
pipeline between supports or anchors may not
be restricted.
(2) Provision must be made for the service
conditions involved.
(3) Movement of the pipeline may not (1) Pipe more than 2 inches (51 millime-
cause disengagement of the support equipment. ters) in diameter that is carrying gas under
(d) Each support on an exposed pipeline pressure; or
operated at a stress level of 50 percent or more (2) Gas handling equipment other than gas
of SMYS must comply with the following: utilization equipment used for domestic pur-
(1) A structural support may not be welded poses.
directly to the pipe. (c) Exits. Each operating floor of a main
(2) The support must be provided by a compressor building must have at least two
member that completely encircles the pipe. separated and unobstructed exits located so as
(3) If an encircling member is welded to a to provide a convenient possibility of escape
pipe, the weld must be continuous and cover and an unobstructed passage to a place of safe-
the entire circumference. ty. Each door latch on an exit must be of a
(e) Each underground pipeline that is con- type which can be readily opened from the in-
nected to a relatively unyielding line or other side without a key. Each swinging door lo-
fixed object must have enough flexibility to cated in an exterior wall must be mounted to
provide for possible movement, or it must have swing outward.
an anchor that will limit the movement of the (d) Fenced areas. Each fence around a
pipeline. compressor station must have at least two gates
(f) Except for offshore pipelines, each un- located so as to provide a convenient opportu-
derground pipeline that is being connected to nity for escape to a place of safety, or have
new branches must have a firm foundation for other facilities affording a similarly convenient
both the header and the branch to prevent de- exit from the area. Each gate located within
trimental lateral and vertical movement. 200 feet (61 meters) of any compressor plant
building must open outward and, when occu-
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended by pied, must be openable from the inside without
Amdt. 192-27, 41 FR 34598, Aug. 16, 1976; a key.
Amdt. 192-58, 53 FR 1633, Jan. 21, 1988] (e) Electrical facilities. Electrical equip-
ment and wiring installed in compressor sta-
tions must conform to the National Electrical
192.163 Compressor stations: Design and Code, ANSI/NFPA 70, so far as that code is
construction. applicable.
(a) Location of compressor building. Ex- [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended by
cept for a compressor building on a platform Amdt. 192-27, 41 FR 34598, Aug. 16, 1976;
located offshore or in inland navigable waters, Amdt. 192-37, 46 FR 10157, Feb. 2, 1981;
each main compressor building of a compres- Amdt. 192-68, 58 FR 14519, Mar. 18, 1993;
sor station must be located on property under Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13, 1998]
the control of the operator. It must be far
enough away from adjacent property, not under
control of the operator, to minimize the possi- 192.165 Compressor stations:
bility of fire being communicated to the com- Liquid removal.
pressor building from structures on adjacent
property. There must be enough open space (a) Where entrained vapors in gas may li-
around the main compressor building to allow quefy under the anticipated pressure and tem-
the free movement of fire-fighting equipment. perature conditions, the compressor must be
(b) Building construction. Each building protected against the introduction of those liq-
on a compressor station site must be made of uids in quantities that could cause damage.
noncombustible materials if it contains either (b) Each liquid separator used to remove
entrained liquids at a compressor station must:
(1) Have a manually operable means of (iii) Not more than 500 feet (153 meters)
removing these liquids. from the limits of the station.
(2) Where slugs of liquid could be carried (b) If a compressor station supplies gas di-
into the compressors, have either automatic rectly to a distribution system with no other
liquid removal facilities, an automatic com- adequate source of gas available, the emergen-
pressor shutdown device, or a high liquid level cy shutdown system must be designed so that it
alarm; and, will not function at the wrong time and cause
(3) Be manufactured in accordance with an unintended outage on the distribution sys-
section VIII of the ASME Boiler and Pressure tem.
Vessel Code, except that liquid separators con- (c) On a platform located offshore or in in-
structed of pipe and fittings without internal land navigable waters, the emergency shut-
welding must be fabricated with a design factor down system must be designed and installed to
of 0.4, or less. actuate automatically by each of the following
events:
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970] (1) In the case of an unattended compressor
station:
(i) When the gas pressure equals the maxi-
192.167 Compressor stations: mum allowable operating pressure plus 15 per-
Emergency shutdown. cent or
(ii) When an uncontrolled fire occurs on
(a) Except for unattended field compressor the platform; and
stations of 1,000 horsepower (746 kilowatts) or (2) In the case of a compressor station in a
less, each compressor station must have an building:
emergency shutdown system that meets the (i) When an uncontrolled fire occurs in the
following: building; or
(1) It must be able to block gas out of the (ii) When the concentration of gas in air
station and blow down the station piping. reaches 50 percent or more of the lower explo-
(2) It must discharge gas from the blow- sive limit in a building which has a source of
down piping at a location where the gas will ignition.
not create a hazard.
(3) It must provide means for the shutdown For the purpose of paragraph (c)(2)(ii) of
of gas compressing equipment, gas fires, and this section, an electrical facility which con-
electrical facilities in the vicinity of gas head- forms to Class 1, Group D of the National
ers and in the compressor building, except, Electrical Code is not a source of ignition.
that:
(i) Electrical circuits that supply emergency [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended by
lighting required to assist station personnel in Amdt. 192-27, 41 FR 34605, Aug. 16, 1976;
evacuating the compressor building and the Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13, 1998]
area in the vicinity of the gas headers must re-
main energized; and
(ii) Electrical circuits needed to protect 192.169 Compressor stations: Pressure
equipment from damage may remain ener- limiting devices.
gized.
(4) It must be operable from at least two (a) Each compressor station must have
locations, each of which is: pressure relief or other suitable protective de-
(i) Outside the gas area of the station; vices of sufficient capacity and sensitivity to
(ii) Near the exit gates, if the station is ensure that the maximum allowable operating
fenced, or near emergency exits, if not fenced; pressure of the station piping and equipment is
and, not exceeded by more than 10 percent.
(b) Each vent line that exhausts gas from 192.175 Pipe-type and bottle-type holders.
the pressure relief valves of a compressor sta-
tion must extend to a location where the gas (a) Each pipe-type and bottle-type holder
may be discharged without hazard. must be designed so as to prevent the accumu-
lation of liquids in the holder, in connecting
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970] pipe, or in auxiliary equipment, that might
cause corrosion or interfere with the safe oper-
ation of the holder.
192.171 Compressor stations: Additional (b) Each pipe-type or bottle-type holder
safety equipment. must have minimum clearance from other
holders in accordance with the following for-
(a) Each compressor station must have mula:
adequate fire protection facilities. If fire pumps
are a part of these facilities, their operation C = (D x P x F)/48.33)
may not be affected by the emergency shut-
down system. (C = (3D x P x F)/1,000)
(b) Each compressor station prime mover,
other than an electrical induction or synchron- in which:
ous motor, must have an automatic device to
shut down the unit before the speed of either C= Minimum clearance between pipe
the prime mover or the driven unit exceeds a containers or bottles in inches (mil-
maximum safe speed. limeters).
(c) Each compressor unit in a compressor D= Outside diameter of pipe containers
station must have a shutdown or alarm device or bottles in inches (millimeters).
that operates in the event of inadequate cooling P= Maximum allowable operating
or lubrication of the unit. pressure, psi (kPa) gage.
(d) Each compressor station gas engine that F= Design factor as set forth in
operates with pressure gas injection must be 192.111 of this part.
equipped so that stoppage of the engine auto-
matically shuts off the fuel and vents the en- [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended by
gine distribution manifold. Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13, 1998]
(e) Each muffler for a gas engine in a com-
pressor station must have vent slots or holes in
the baffles of each compartment to prevent gas 192.177 Additional provisions for bottle-
from being trapped in the muffler. type holders.
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970] (a) Each bottle-type holder must be
(1) Located on a site entirely surrounded by
fencing that prevents access by unauthorized
192.173 Compressor stations: persons and with minimum clearance from the
Ventilation. fence as follows:
(3) Buried with a minimum cover in accor- (4) Each point on the pipeline in a Class 1
dance with 192.327. location must be within 10 miles (16 kilome-
(b) Each bottle-type holder manufactured ters) of a valve.
from steel that is not weldable under field con- (b) Each sectionalizing block valve on a
ditions must comply with the following: transmission line, other than offshore seg-
(1) A bottle-type holder made from alloy ments, must comply with the following:
steel must meet the chemical and tensile re- (1) The valve and the operating device to
quirements for the various grades of steel in open or close the valve must be readily access-
ASTM A 372/A 372M. ible and protected from tampering and damage.
(2) The actual yield-tensile ratio of the steel (2) The valve must be supported to prevent
may not exceed 0.85. settling of the valve or movement of the pipe to
(3) Welding may not be performed on the which it is attached.
holder after it has been heat treated or stress (c) Each section of a transmission line, oth-
relieved, except that copper wires may be at- er than offshore segments, between main line
tached to the small diameter portion of the bot- valves must have a blowdown valve with
tle end closure for cathodic protection if a loca- enough capacity to allow the transmission line
lized thermit welding process is used. to be blown down as rapidly as practicable.
(4) The holder must be given a mill hydros- Each blowdown discharge must be located so
tatic test at a pressure that produces a hoop the gas can be blown to the atmosphere with-
stress at least equal to 85 percent of the SMYS. out hazard and, if the transmission line is adja-
(5) The holder, connection pipe, and com- cent to an overhead electric line, so that the gas
ponents must be leak tested after installation as is directed away from the electrical conductors.
required by Subpart J of this part. (d) Offshore segments of transmission lines
must be equipped with valves or other compo-
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970 as amended by nents to shut off the flow of gas to an offshore
Amdt 192-58, 53 FR 1635, Jan 21, 1988; Amdt platform in an emergency.
192-62, 54 FR 5625, Feb. 6, 1989; Amdt 192-
68, 58 FR 14519, Mar. 18, 1993; Amdt. 192- [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended by
85, 63 FR 37500, July 13, 1998] Amdt. 192-27, 41 FR 34598, Aug. 16, 1976;
Amdt. 192-78, 61 FR 28770, June 6, 1996;
Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13, 1998]
192.179 Transmission line valves.
(a) Each transmission line, other than off- 192.181 Distribution line valves.
shore segments, must have sectionalizing block
valves spaced as follows, unless in a particular (a) Each high-pressure distribution system
case the Administrator finds that alternative must have valves spaced so as to reduce the
spacing would provide an equivalent level of time to shut down a section of main in an
safety: emergency. The valve spacing is determined
(1) Each point on the pipeline in a Class 4 by the operating pressure, the size of the mains,
location must be within 2 miles (4 kilome- and the local physical conditions.
ters) of a valve. (b) Each regulator station controlling the
(2) Each point on the pipeline in a Class 3 flow or pressure of gas in a distribution system
location must be within 4 miles (6.4 kilome- must have a valve installed on the inlet piping
ters) of a valve. at a distance from the regulator station suffi-
(3) Each point on the pipeline in a Class 2 cient to permit the operation of the valve dur-
location must be within 7 miles (12 kilome- ing an emergency that might preclude access to
ters) of a valve. the station.
(c) Each valve on a main installed for oper- (c) Water, electric, steam, or other facili-
ating or emergency purposes must comply with ties.
the following:
(1) The valve must be placed in a readily [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970]
accessible location so as to facilitate its opera-
tion in an emergency.
(2) The operating stem or mechanism must 192.187 Vaults: Sealing, venting, and ven-
be readily accessible. tilation.
(3) If the valve is installed in a buried box
or enclosure, the box or enclosure must be in- Each underground vault or closed top pit
stalled so as to avoid transmitting external containing either a pressure regulating or re-
loads to the main. ducing station, or a pressure limiting or reliev-
ing station, must be sealed, vented or venti-
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970] lated, as follows:
(a) When the internal volume exceeds 200
cubic feet (5.7 cubic meters):
192.183 Vaults: Structural design re- (1) The vault or pit must be ventilated with
quirements. two ducts, each having at least the ventilating
effect of a pipe 4 inches (102 millimeters) in
(a) Each underground vault or pit for diameter;
valves, pressure relieving, pressure limiting, or (2) The ventilation must be enough to mi-
pressure regulating stations, must be able to nimize the formation of combustible atmos-
meet the loads which may be imposed upon it, phere in the vault or pit; and,
and to protect installed equipment. (3) The ducts must be high enough above
(b) There must be enough working space so grade to disperse any gas-air mixtures that
that all of the equipment required in the vault might be discharged.
or pit can be properly installed, operated, and (b) When the internal volume is more than
maintained. 75 cubic feet (2.1 cubic meters) but less than
(c) Each pipe entering, or within, a regula- 200 cubic feet (5.7 cubic meters):
tor vault or pit must be steel for sizes 10 inches (1) If the vault or pit is sealed, each open-
(254 millimeters), and less, except that control ing must have a tight fitting cover without
and gage piping may be copper. Where pipe open holes through which an explosive mixture
extends through the vault or pit structure, pro- might be ignited, and there must be a means
vision must be made to prevent the passage of for testing the internal atmosphere before re-
gases or liquids through the opening and to moving the cover;
avert strains in the pipe. (2) If the vault or pit is vented, there must
be a means of preventing external sources of
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended by ignition from reaching the vault atmosphere; or
Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13, 1998] (3) If the vault or pit is ventilated, para-
graph (a) or (c) of this section applies.
(c) If a vault or pit covered by paragraph
192.185 Vaults: Accessibility. (b) of this section is ventilated by openings in
the covers or gratings and the ratio of the inter-
Each vault must be located in an accessible nal volume, in cubic feet, to the effective venti-
location and, so far as practical, away from: lating area of the cover or grating, in square
(a) Street intersections or points where traf- feet, is less than 20 to 1, no additional ventila-
fic is heavy or dense; tion is required.
(b) Points of minimum elevation, catch ba-
sins, or places where the access cover will be [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended by
in the course of surface waters; and, Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13, 1998]
192.189 Vaults: Drainage and waterproof- allowable operating pressure could be ex-
ing. ceeded as the result of pressure control failure
or of some other type of failure, must have
(a) Each vault must be designed so as to pressure relieving or pressure limiting devices
minimize the entrance of water. that meet the requirements of 192.199 and
(b) A vault containing gas piping may not 192.201.
be connected by means of a drain connection to (b) Additional requirements for distribution
any other underground structure. systems. Each distribution system that is sup-
(c) Electrical equipment in vaults must con- plied from a source of gas that is at a higher
form to the applicable requirements of Class 1, pressure than the maximum allowable operat-
Group D, of the National Electrical Code, AN- ing pressure for the system must
SI/NFPA 70. (1) Have pressure regulation devices capa-
ble of meeting the pressure, load, and other
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970as amended by service conditions that will be experienced in
Amdt. 192-76, 61 FR 26121, May 24, 1996] normal operation of the system, and that could
be activated in the event of failure of some por-
tion of the system; and
192.191 Design pressure of plastic fittings. (2) Be designed so as to prevent accidental
overpressuring.
(a) Thermosetting fittings for plastic pipe
must conform to ASTM D 2517 , (incorporated [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970]
by reference, see 192.7).
(b) Thermoplastic fittings for plastic pipe
must conform to ASTM D 2513-99, (incorpo- 192.197 Control of the pressure of gas de-
rated by reference, see 192.7). livered from high-pressure distribution sys-
tems.
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended by
Amdt. 192-3, 35 FR 17660, Nov. 17, 1970; (a) If the maximum actual operating pres-
Amdt. 192-58, 53 FR 1633, Jan. 21, 1988; sure of the distribution system is 60 psi (414
Amdt. 192-114, 74 FR 48593, Aug 11, 2010] kPa) gage, or less, and a service regulator hav-
ing the following characteristics is used, no
other pressure limiting device is required:
192.193 Valve installation in plastic pipe. (1) A regulator capable of reducing distri-
bution line pressure to pressures recommended
Each valve installed in plastic pipe must be for household appliances.
designed so as to protect the plastic material (2) A single port valve with proper orifice
against excessive torsional or shearing loads for the maximum gas pressure at the regulator
when the valve or shutoff is operated, and from inlet.
any other secondary stresses that might be ex- (3) A valve seat made of resilient material
erted through the valve or its enclosure. designed to withstand abrasion of the gas, im-
purities in gas, cutting by the valve, and to res-
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970] ist permanent deformation when it is pressed
against the valve port.
(4) Pipe connections to the regulator not
192.195 Protection against accidental exceeding 2 inches (51 millimeters) in diame-
overpressuring. ter.
(5) A regulator that, under normal operat-
(a) General requirements. Except as pro- ing conditions, is able to regulate the down-
vided in 192.197, each pipeline that is con- stream pressure within the necessary limits of
nected to a gas source so that the maximum accuracy and to limit the build-up of pressure
under no-flow conditions to prevent a pressure used alone only in those cases where the inlet
that would cause the unsafe operation of any pressure on the service regulator does not ex-
connected and properly adjusted gas utilization ceed the manufacturer's safe working pressure
equipment. rating of the service regulator, and may not be
(6) A self-contained service regulator with used where the inlet pressure on the service
no external static or control lines. regulator exceeds 125 p.s.i. (862 kPa) gage.
(b) If the maximum actual operating pres- For higher inlet pressure, the methods in para-
sure of the distribution system is 60 p.s.i. (414 graph (c)(1) or (2) of this section must be used.
kPa) gage or less, and a service regulator that (4) A service regulator and an automatic
does not have all of the characteristics listed in shutoff device that closes upon a rise in pres-
paragraph (a) of this section is used, or if the sure downstream from the regulator and re-
gas contains materials that seriously interfere mains closed until manually reset.
with the operation of service regulators, there
must be suitable protective devices to prevent [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended by
unsafe overpressuring of the customer's ap- Amdt. 192-3, 35 FR 17660, Nov. 7, 1970;
pliances if the service regulator fails. Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13, 1998;
(c) If the maximum actual operating pres- Amdt. 192-93, 68 FR 53895, Sept. 15, 2003]
sure of the distribution system exceeds 60 p.s.i.
(414 kPa) gage, one of the following methods
must be used to regulate and limit, to the max- 192.199 Requirements for design of pres-
imum safe value, the pressure of gas delivered sure relief and limiting devices.
to the customer:
(1) A service regulator having the characte- Except for rupture discs, each pressure re-
ristics listed in paragraph (a) of this section, lief or pressure limiting device must:
and another regulator located upstream from (a) Be constructed of materials such that
the service regulator. The upstream regulator the operation of a device will not be impaired
may not be set to maintain a pressure higher by corrosion;
than 60 p.s.i. (414 kPa) gage. A device must (b) Have valves and valve seats that are
be installed between the upstream regulator designed not to stick in a position that will
and the service regulator to limit the pressure make the device inoperative;
on the inlet of the service regulator to 60 p.s.i. (c) Be designed and installed so that it can
(414 kPa) gage or less in case the upstream be readily operated to determine if the valve is
regulator fails to function properly. This device free, can be tested to determine the pressure at
may be either a relief valve or an automatic which it will operate, and can be tested for lea-
shutoff that shuts, if the pressure on the inlet of kage when in the closed position;
the service regulator exceeds the set pressure (d) Have support made of noncombustible
60p.s.i. (414 kPa) gage or less), and remains material;
closed until manually reset. (e) Have discharge stacks, vents, or outlet
(2) A service regulator and a monitoring ports designed to prevent accumulation of wa-
regulator set to limit, to a maximum safe value, ter, ice, or snow, located where gas can be dis-
the pressure of the gas delivered to the custom- charged into the atmosphere without undue
er. hazard;
(3) A service regulator with a relief valve (f) Be designed and installed so that the
vented to the outside atmosphere, with the re- size of the openings, pipe, and fittings located
lief valve set to open so that the pressure of gas between the system to be protected and the
going to the customer does not exceed a max- pressure relieving device, and the size of the
imum safe value. The relief valve may either vent line, are adequate to prevent hammering
be built into the service regulator or it may be a of the valve and to prevent impairment of relief
separate unit installed downstream from the capacity;
service regulator. This combination may be
(g) Where installed at a district regulator be installed at each station to ensure that the
station to protect a pipeline system from over- complete failure of the largest capacity regula-
pressuring, be designed and installed to prevent tor or compressor, or any single run of lesser
any single incident such as an explosion in a capacity regulators or compressors in that sta-
vault or damage by a vehicle from affecting the tion, will not impose pressures on any part of
operation of both the overpressure protective the pipeline or distribution system in excess of
device and the district regulator; and, those for which it was designed, or against
(h) Except for a valve that will isolate the which it was protected, whichever is lower.
system under protection from its source of (c) Relief valves or other pressure limiting
pressure, be designed to prevent unauthorized devices must be installed at or near each regu-
operation of any stop valve that will make the lator station in a low-pressure distribution sys-
pressure relief valve or pressure limiting device tem, with a capacity to limit the maximum
inoperative. pressure in the main to a pressure that will not
exceed the safe operating pressure for any con-
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended by nected and properly adjusted gas utilization
Amdt. 192-3, 35 FR 17660, Nov. 17, 1970] equipment.
(a) Welding must be performed by a quali- [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended by
fied welder in accordance with welding proce- Amdt. 192-18, 40 FR 10181, Mar. 5, 1975;
dures qualified under section 5 of API 1104 Amdt. 192-18A, 40 FR 27222, June 27, 1975;
(incorporated by reference, see 192.7) or sec- Amdt. 192-22, 41 FR 13590, Mar. 31, 1976;
tion IX of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Ves- Amdt. 192-37, 46 FR 10157, Feb. 2, 1981;
sel Code Welding and Brazing Qualifica- Amdt. 192-43, 47 FR 46850, Oct. 21, 1982;
tions (incorporated by reference, see 192.7) Amdt. 192-52, 51 FR 20294, June 4, 1986;
to produce welds meeting the requirements of Amdt. 192-75, 61 FR 18512, Apr. 26, 1996;
this subpart. The quality of the test welds used Amdt. 192-78, 61 FR 28770, June 6, 1996;
to qualify welding procedures shall be deter- Amdt. 192-94, 69 FR 32886, June 14, 2004;
mined by destructive testing in accordance Amdt. 192-103, 71 FR 33402, June 8, 2006;
with the applicable welding standard(s). Amdt. 192-103c, 72 FR 4655, Feb. 1, 2007]
(b) Each welding procedure must be rec-
orded in detail, including the results of the qua-
lifying tests. This record must be retained and 192.229 Limitations on welders.
followed whenever the procedure is used.
(a) No welder whose qualification is based
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended by on nondestructive testing may weld compres-
Amdt. 192-18, 40 FR 10181, Mar. 5, 1975; sor station pipe and components.
Amdt. 192-22, 41 FR 13590, Mar. 31, 1976; (b) No welder may weld with a particular
Amdt. 192-37, 46 FR 10157, Feb. 2, 1981; welding process unless, within the preceding 6
Amdt. 192-52, 51 FR 20297, June 4, 1986; calendar months, he has engaged in welding
Amdt. 192-94, 69 FR 32886, June 14, 2004; with that process.
Amdt. 192-103, 71 FR 33402, June 8, 2006] (c) A welder qualified under 192.227(a)
(1) May not weld on pipe to be operated at
a pressure that produces a hoop stress of 20
percent or more of SMYS unless within the
preceding 6 calendar months the welder has 192.231 Protection from weather.
had one weld tested and found acceptable un-
der the sections 6 or 9 of API Standard 1104 The welding operation must be protected
(incorporated by reference, see 192.7). Alter- from weather conditions that would impair the
natively, welders may maintain an ongoing qu- quality of the completed weld.
alification status by performing welds tested
and found acceptable under the above accep- [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970]
tance criteria at least twice each calendar year,
but at intervals not exceeding 7 months. A
welder qualified under an earlier edition of a 192.233 Miter joints.
standard listed in 192.7 of this part may weld
but may not requalify under that earlier edition; (a) A miter joint on steel pipe to be operat-
and ed at a pressure that produces a hoop stress of
(2) May not weld on pipe to be operated at 30 percent or more of SMYS may not deflect
a pressure that produces a hoop stress of less the pipe more than 3.
than 20 percent of SMYS unless the welder is (b) A miter joint on steel pipe to be operat-
tested in accordance with paragraph (c)(1) of ed at a pressure that produces a hoop stress of
this section or requalifies under paragraph less than 30 percent, but more than 10 percent
(d)(1) or (d)(2) of this section. of SMYS may not deflect the pipe more than
(d) A welder qualified under 192.227(b) 12 and must be a distance equal to one pipe
may not weld unless diameter or more away from any other miter
(1) Within the preceding 15 calendar joint, as measured from the crotch of each
months, but at least once each calendar year, joint.
the welder has requalified under 192.227(b); (c) A miter joint on steel pipe to be operat-
or ed at a pressure that produces a hoop stress of
(2) Within the preceding 7 calendar 10 percent or less of SMYS may not deflect the
months, but at least twice each calendar year, pipe more than 90.
the welder has had
(i) A production weld cut out, tested, and [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970]
found acceptable in accordance with the quali-
fying test; or
(ii) For welders who work only on service 192.235 Preparation for welding.
lines 2 inches (51 millimeters) or smaller in
diameter, two sample welds tested and found Before beginning any welding, the welding
acceptable in accordance with the test in sec- surfaces must be clean and free of any material
tion III of Appendix C of this part. that may be detrimental to the weld, and the
pipe or component must be aligned to provide
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended by the most favorable condition for depositing the
Amdt. 192-18, 40 FR 10181, Mar. 5, 1975; root bead. This alignment must be preserved
Amdt. 192-18A, 40 FR 27222, June 27, 1975; while the root bead is being deposited.
Amdt. 192-37, 46 FR 10157, Feb. 2, 1981;
Amdt. 192-78, 61 FR 28770, June 6, 1996; [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970]
Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13, 1998;
Amdt. 192-94, 69 FR 32886, June 14, 2004;
Amdt. 192-103, 71 FR 33402, June 8, 2006] 192.237 [Removed]
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended by (a) Nondestructive testing of welds must be
Amdt. 192-37, 46 FR 10157, Feb. 2, 1981; performed by any process, other than trepan-
Amdt. 192-52, 51 FR 20294, June 4, 1986] ning, that will clearly indicate defects that may
affect the integrity of the weld.
(b) Nondestructive testing of welds must be
192.241 Inspection and test of welds. performed:
(1) In accordance with written procedures;
(a) Visual inspection of welding must be and
conducted by an individual qualified by appro- (2) By persons who have been trained and
priate training and experience to ensure that: qualified in the established procedures and
(1) The welding is performed in accordance with the equipment employed in testing.
with the welding procedure; and (c) Procedures must be established for the
(2) The weld is acceptable under paragraph proper interpretation of each nondestructive
(c) of this section. test of a weld to ensure the acceptability of the
(b) The welds on a pipeline to be operated weld under 192.241(c).
at a pressure that produces a hoop stress of 20 (d) When nondestructive testing is required
percent or more of SMYS must be nondestruc- under 192.241(b), the following percentages
tively tested in accordance with 192.243, ex- of each day's field butt welds, selected at ran-
cept that welds that are visually inspected and dom by the operator, must be nondestructively
approved by a qualified welding inspector need tested over their entire circumference;
not be nondestructively tested if: (1) In Class 1 locations, except offshore, at
(1) The pipe has a nominal diameter of less least 10 percent.
than 6 inches (152 millimeters); or (2) In Class 2 locations, at least 15 percent.
(2) The pipeline is to be operated at a pres- (3) In Class 3 and Class 4 locations, at
sure that produces a hoop stress of less than 40 crossings of major or navigable rivers, off-
percent of SMYS and the welds are so limited shore, and within railroad or public highway
in number that nondestructive testing is im- rights-of-way, including tunnels, bridges, and
practical. overhead road crossings, 100 percent unless
(c) The acceptability of a weld that is non- impracticable, in which case at least 90 per-
destructively tested or visually inspected is de- cent. Nondestructive testing must be imprac-
termined according to the standards in Section ticable for each girth weld not tested.
9 of API Standard 1104 (incorporated by refer- (4) At pipeline tie-ins, including tie-ins of
ence, see 192.7). However, if a girth weld is replacement sections, 100 percent.
unacceptable under those standards for a rea- (e) Except for a welder whose work is iso-
son other than a crack, and if Appendix A to lated from the principal welding activity, a
API 1104 applies to the weld, the acceptability sample of each welder's work for each day
of the weld may be further determined under must be nondestructively tested, when nonde-
that appendix. structive testing is required under 192.241(b).
(f) When nondestructive testing is required
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended by under 192.241(b), each operator must retain,
Amdt. 192-18, 40 FR 10181, Mar. 5, 1975; for the life of the pipeline, a record showing by
Amdt. 192-18A, 40 FR 27222, June 27, 1975; milepost, engineering station, or by geographic
Amdt. 192-37, 46 FR 10157, Feb. 2, 1981; feature, the number of girth welds made, the
Amdt. 192-78, 61 FR 28770, June 6, 1996; number nondestructively tested, the number
Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13, 1998; rejected, and the disposition of the rejects.
Amdt. 192-94, 69 FR 32886, June 14, 2004; [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended by
Amdt. 192-103, 71 FR 33402, June 8, 2006] Amdt. 192-27, 41 FR 34598, Aug. 16, 1976;
Subpart FJoining of Materials Other Than [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended by
by Welding Amdt. 192-62, 54 FR 5628, Feb. 6, 1989]
(a) This subpart prescribes minimum re- (a) Ductile iron pipe may not be joined by
quirements for joining materials in pipelines, threaded joints.
other than by welding. (b) Ductile iron pipe may not be joined by
(b) This subpart does not apply to joining brazing.
during the manufacture of pipe or pipeline
components. [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended by
Amdt. 192-62, 54 FR 5628, Feb. 6, 1989, ef-
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970] fective Mar. 8, 1989]
(a) The pipeline must be designed and in- Copper pipe may not be threaded except
stalled so that each joint will sustain the longi- that copper pipe used for joining screw fittings
tudinal pullout or thrust forces caused by con- or valves may be threaded if the wall thickness
traction or expansion of the piping or by antic- is equivalent to the comparable size of Sche-
ipated external or internal loading. dule 40 or heavier wall pipe listed in Table C1
(b) Each joint must be made in accordance of ASME/ANSI B16.5.
with written procedures that have been proved
by test or experience to produce strong gas [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended by
tight joints. Amdt. 192-62 , 54 FR 5628, Feb. 6, 1989;
(c) Each joint must be inspected to insure Amdt. 192-68, 58 FR 14519, Mar. 18, 1993]
compliance with this subpart.
(c) Heat-fusion joints. Each heat-fusion plastic pipe joints by a heat fusion, solvent ce-
joint on plastic pipe must comply with the fol- ment, or adhesive method, the procedure must
lowing: be qualified by subjecting specimen joints
(1) A butt heat-fusion joint must be joined made according to theprocedure to the follow-
by a device that holds the heater element ing tests:
square to the ends of the piping, compresses (1) The burst test requirements of
the heated ends together, and holds the pipe in (i) In the case of thermoplastic pipe, para-
proper alignment while the plastic hardens. graph 6.6 (sustained pressure test) or paragraph
(2) A socket heat-fusion joint must be 6.7 (Minimum Hydrostatic Burst Test) or para-
joined by a device that heats the mating surfac- graph 8.9 ( Sustained Static pressure Test) of
es of the joint uniformly and simultaneously to ASTM D2513-99 (incorporated by reference,
essentially the same temperature. see 192.7);
(3) An electrofusion joint must be joined (ii) In the case of thermosetting plastic pipe,
utilizing the equipment and techniques of the paragraph 8.5 (Minimum Hydrostatic Burst
fittings manufacturer or equipment and tech- Pressure) or paragraph 8.9 (Sustained Static
niques shown, by testing joints to the require- Pressure Test) of ASTM D2517 (incorporated
ments of 192.283(a)(1)(iii), to be at least by reference, see 192.7); or
equivalent to those of the fittings manufacturer. (iii) In the case of electrofusion fittings for
(4) Heat may not be applied with a torch or polyethylene (PE) pipe and tubing, paragraph
other open flame. 9.1 (Minimum Hydraulic Burst Pressure Test),
(d) Adhesive joints. Each adhesive joint on paragraph 9.2 (Sustained Pressure Test), para-
plastic pipe must comply with the following: graph 9.3 (Tensile Strength Test), or paragraph
(1) The adhesive must conform to ASTM 9.4 (Joint Integrity Tests) of ASTM Designa-
Designation: D 2517. tion F1055 (incorporated by reference, see
(2) The materials and adhesive must be 192.7).
compatible with each other. (2) For procedures intended for lateral pipe
(e) Mechanical joints. Each compression connections, subject a specimen joint made
type mechanical joint on plastic pipe must from pipe sections joined at right angles ac-
comply with the following: cording to the procedure to a force on the later-
(1) The gasket material in the coupling al pipe until failure occurs in the specimen. If
must be compatible with the plastic. failure initiates outside the joint area, the pro-
(2) A rigid internal tubular stiffener, other cedure qualifies for use; and,
than a split tubular stiffener, must be used in (3) For procedures intended for non-lateral
conjunction with the coupling. pipe connections, follow the tensile test re-
quirements of ASTM D638 (incorporated by
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended by reference, see 192.7), except that the test may
Amdt. 192-34, 44 FR 42968, July 23, 1979; be conducted at ambient temperature and hu-
Amdt. 192-58, 53 FR 1635, Jan. 21, 1988; midity. If the specimen elongates no less than
Amdt. 192-61, 53 FR 36793, Sept. 22, 1988; 25 percent or failure initiates outside the joint
Amdt. 192-68, 58 FR 14519, Mar. 18, 1993; area, the procedure qualifies for use.
Amdt. 192-78, 61 FR 28770, June 6, 1996; (b) Mechanical joints. Before any written
Amdt. 192-114, 74 FR 48593, Aug 11, 2010] procedure established under 192.273(b) is
used for making mechanical plastic pipe joints
that are designed to withstand tensile forces,
192.283 Plastic pipe; Qualifying joining the procedure must be qualified by subjecting
procedures. five specimen joints made according to the
procedure to the following tensile test:
(a) Heat fusion, solvent cement, and adhe- (1) Use an apparatus for the test as speci-
sive joints. Before any written procedure es- fied in ASTM D 638 (except for conditioning),
tablished under 192.273(b) is used for making (incorporated by reference, see 192.7).
(2) The specimen must be of such length 192.285 Plastic pipe: Qualifying persons
that the distance between the grips of the appa- to make joints.
ratus and the end of the stiffener does not af-
fect the joint strength. (a) No person may make a plastic pipe joint
(3) The speed of testing is 0.20 in. (5.0 unless that person has been qualified under the
mm) per minute, plus or minus 25 percent. applicable joining procedure by:
(4) Pipe specimens less than 4 in. (102 (1) Appropriate training or experience in
mm) in diameter are qualified if the pipe yields the use of the procedure; and
to an elongation of no less than 25 percent or (2) Making a specimen joint from pipe sec-
failure initiates outside the joint area. tions joined according to the procedure that
(5) Pipe specimens 4 in. (102 mm) and passes the inspection and test set forth in para-
larger in diameter shall be pulled until the pipe graph (b) of this section.
is subjected to a tensile stress equal to or great- (b) The specimen joint must be:
er than the maximum thermal stress that would (1) Visually examined during and after as-
be produced by a temperature change of 100F sembly or joining and found to have the same
(38C) or until the pipe is pulled from the fit- appearance as a joint or photographs of a joint
ting. If the pipe pulls from the fitting, the low- that is acceptable under the procedure; and
est value of the five test results or the manufac- (2) In the case of a heat fusion, solvent ce-
turer's rating, whichever is lower must be used ment, or adhesive joint;
in the design calculations for stress. (i) Tested under any one of the test me-
(6) Each specimen that fails at the grips thods listed under 192.283(a) applicable to
must be retested using new pipe. the type of joint and material being tested;
(7) Results obtained pertain only to the (ii) Examined by ultrasonic inspection and
specific outside diameter, and material of the found not to contain flaws that would cause
pipe tested, except that testing of a heavier wall failure; or
pipe may be used to qualify pipe of the same (iii) Cut into at least three longitudinal
material but with a lesser wall thickness. straps, each of which is:
(c) A copy of each written procedure being (A) Visually examined and found not to
used for joining plastic pipe must be available contain voids or discontinuities on the cut sur-
to the persons making and inspecting joints. faces of the joint area; and
(d) Pipe or fittings manufactured before (B) Deformed by bending, torque, or im-
July 1, 1980, may be used in accordance with pact, and if failure occurs, it must not initiate in
procedures that the manufacturer certifies will the joint area.
produce a joint as strong as the pipe. (c) A person must be requalified under an
applicable procedure, if during any 12-month
[Amdt. 192-34, 44 FR 42968, July 23, 1979 as period that person:
amended by Amdt. 192-34A, 45 FR 9931, Feb. (1) Does not make any joints under that
14, 1980; Amdt. 192-34B, 46 FR 39, Jan. 2, procedure; or
1981; Amdt. 192-34(1), 47 FR 32720, July 29, (2) Has 3 joints or 3 percent of the joints
1982; Amdt. 192-34(2), 47 FR 49973, Nov. 4, made, whichever is greater, under that proce-
1982; Amdt. 192-68, 58 FR 14519, Mar. 18, dure that are found unacceptable by testing un-
1993; Amdt. 192-78, 61 FR 28770, June 6, der 192.513.
1996; Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13, (d) Each operator shall establish a method
1998; Amdt. 192-94, 69 FR 32886, June 14, to determine that each person making joints in
2004; Amdt. 192-94A, 69 FR 54591, Sept. 9, plastic pipelines in the operator's is qualified in
2004; Amdt. 192-103, 71 FR 33402, June 8, accordance with this section.
2006] ; Amdt. 192-114, 74 FR 48593, Aug 11,
2010 [Amdt. 192-34, 44 FR 42968, July 23, 1979 as
amended by Amdt. 192-34A, 45 FR 9931, Feb.
14, 1980, Amdt. 192-34B, 46 FR 39, Jan. 2,
Subpart GGeneral Construction Require- made by grinding, the remaining wall thickness
ments for Transmission Lines and Mains. must a least be equal to either:
(1) The minimum thickness required by the
tolerances in the specification to which the
192.301 Scope. pipe was manufactured; or
(2) The nominal wall thickness required
This subpart prescribes minimum require- for the design pressure of the pipeline.
ments for constructing transmission lines and (b) Each of the following dents must be
mains. removed from steel pipe to be operated at a
pressure that produces a hoop stress of 20 per-
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970] cent, or more, of SMYS, unless the dent is re-
paired by a method that reliable engineering
tests and analyses show can permanently re-
192.303 Compliance with specifications or store the serviceability of the pipe:
standards. (1) A dent that contains a stress concentra-
tor such as a scratch, gouge, groove, or arc
Each transmission line or main must be burn.
constructed in accordance with comprehensive (2) A dent that affects the longitudinal weld
written specifications or standards that are con- or a circumferential weld.
sistent with this part. (3) In pipe to be operated at a pressure that
produces a hoop stress of 40 percent or more of
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970] SMYS, a dent that has a depth of:
(i) More than inch (6.4 millimeters) in
pipe 12 inches (324 millimeters) or less in
192.305 Inspection: General. outer diameter; or
(ii) More than 2 percent of the nominal
Each transmission line or main must be in- pipe diameter in pipe over 12 inches (324
spected to ensure that it is constructed in ac- millimeters) in outer diameter.
cordance with this part.
For the purposes of this section, a "dent" is a
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970] depression that produces a gross disturbance in
the curvature of the pipe wall without reducing
the pipe-wall thickness. The depth of a dent is
192.307 Inspection of materials. measured as the gap between the lowest point
of the dent and a prolongation of the original
Each length of pipe and each other compo- contour of the pipe.
nent must be visually inspected at the site of
installation to ensure that it has not sustained (c) Each arc burn on steel pipe to be oper-
any visually determinable damage that could ated at a pressure that produces a hoop stress of
impair its serviceability. 40 percent or more, of SMYS must be repaired
or removed. If a repair is made by grinding,
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970] the arc burn must be completely removed and
the remaining wall thickness must be at least
equal to either:
192.309 Repair of steel pipe. (1) The minimum wall thickness required
by the tolerances in the specification to which
(a) Each imperfection or damage that im- the pipe was manufactured; or
pairs the serviceability of a length of steel pipe (2) The nominal wall thickness required for
must be repaired or removed. If a repair is the design pressure of the pipeline.
(d) A gouge, groove, arc burn, or dent may that is 2 inches (51 millimeters) or more in di-
not be repaired by insert patching or by pound- ameter unless the arc length, as measured along
ing out. the crotch, is at least 1 inch (25 millimeters).
(e) Each gouge, groove, arc burn, or dent
that is removed from a length of pipe must be [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended by
removed by cutting out the damaged portion as Amdt. 192-26, 41 FR 26106, June 24, 1976;
a cylinder. Amdt. 192-29, 42 FR 42865, Aug. 25, 1977;
Amdt. 192-29C, 42 FR 60148, Nov. 25, 1977;
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended by Amdt. 192-49, 50 FR 13225, Apr. 3, 1985;
Amdt. 192-3, 35 FR 17660, Nov. 17, 1970; Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13, 1998]
Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13, 1998;
Amdt. 192-88, 64 FR 69660, Dec. 14, 1999]
192.315 Wrinkle bends in steel pipe.
192.311 Repair of plastic pipe. (a) A wrinkle bend may not be made on
steel pipe to be operated at a pressure that pro-
Each imperfection or damage that would duces a hoop stress of 30 percent or more, of
impair the serviceability of plastic pipe must be SMYS.
repaired or removed. (b) Each wrinkle bend on steel pipe must
comply with the following:
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended by (1) The bend must not have any sharp
Amdt. 192-93, 68 FR 53895, Sept. 15, 2003] kinks.
(2) When measured along the crotch of the
bend, the wrinkles must be a distance of at
192.313 Bends and elbows. least one pipe diameter.
(3) On pipe 16 inches (406 millimeters) or
(a) Each field bend in steel pipe, other than larger in diameter, the bend may not have a
a wrinkle bend made in accordance with deflection of more than 1 for each wrinkle.
192.315, must comply with the following: (4) On pipe containing a longitudinal weld
(1) A bend must not impair the servicea- the longitudinal seam must be as near as prac-
bility of the pipe. ticable to the neutral axis of the bend.
(2) Each bend must have a smooth contour
and be free from buckling, cracks, or any other [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended by
mechanical damage. Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13, 1998]
(3) On pipe containing a longitudinal weld,
the longitudinal weld must be as near as prac-
ticable to the neutral axis of the bend unless: 192.317 Protection from hazards.
(i) The bend is made with an internal bend-
ing mandrel; or (a) The operator must take all practicable
(ii) The pipe is 12 inches (305 millimeters) steps to protect each transmission line or main
or less in outside diameter or has a diameter to from washouts, floods, unstable soil,
wall thickness ratio less than 70. landslides, or other hazards that may cause the
(b) Each circumferential weld of steel pipe pipeline to move or to sustain abnormal loads.
which is located where the stress during bend- In addition, the operator must take all practica-
ing causes a permanent deformation in the pipe ble steps to protect offshore pipelines from
must be nondestructively tested either before or damage by mud slides, water currents, hurri-
after the bending process. canes, ship anchors, and fishing operations.
(c) Wrought-steel welding elbows and (b) Each above ground transmission line or
transverse segments of these elbows may not main, not located offshore or in inland naviga-
be used for changes in direction on steel pipe ble water areas, must be protected from acci-
(2) Protected from ultraviolet radiation; and plastic transmission line or main must be in-
(3) Not allowed to exceed the pipe temper- stalled with sufficient clearance, or must be
ature limits specified in 192.123. insulated, from any source of heat so as to pre-
vent the heat from impairing the serviceability
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended by of the pipe.
Amdt. 192-78, 61 FR 28770, June 6, 1996; (d) Each pipe-type or bottle-type holder
Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13, 1998; must be installed with a minimum clearance
Amdt. 192-93, 68 FR 53895, Sept. 15, 2003; from any other holder as prescribed in
Amdt. 192-94, 69 FR 32886, June 14, 2004] 192.175(b).
(e) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of place by anchors or heavy concrete coating, or
this section, all pipe installed in a navigable protected by an equivalent means.
river, stream, or harbor must be installed with a (g) All pipelines installed under water in
minimum cover of 48 inches (1219 millime- the Gulf of Mexico and its inlets, as defined in
ters) in soil or 24 inches (610 millimeters) in 192.3, must be installed in accordance with
consolidated rock between the top of the pipe 192.612(b)(3).
and the underwater natural bottom (as deter-
mined by recognized and generally accepted [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended by
practices). Amdt. 192-27, 41 FR 34598, Aug. 16, 1976;
(f) All pipe installed offshore, except in the Amdt. 192-78, 61 FR 28770, June 6, 1996;
Gulf of Mexico and its inlets, under water not Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13, 1998;
more than 200 feet (60 meters) deep, as meas- Amdt. 192-98, 69 FR 48400, Aug. 10, 2004]
ured from the mean low tide, must be installed
as follows:
(1) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of 192.328 Additional construction require-
this section, pipe under water less than 12 feet ments for steel pipe using alternative maxi-
(3.66 meters) deep, must be installed with a mum allowable operating pressure.
minimum cover of 36 inches (914 millimeters)
in soil or 18 inches (457 millimeters) in con- For a new or existing pipeline segment to be
solidated rock between the top of the pipe and eligible for operation at the alternative maxi-
the natural bottom. mum allowable operating pressure calculated
(2) Pipe under water at least 12 feet (3.66 under 192.620, a segment must meet the fol-
meters) deep must be installed so that the top lowing additional construction requirements.
of the pipe is below the natural bottom, unless Records must be maintained, for the useful life
the pipe is supported by stanchions, held in of the pipeline, demonstrating compliance with
these requirements:
To address this con- The pipeline segment must meet this additional construction require-
struction issue: ment:
(a) Quality assurance. (1) The construction of the pipeline segment must be done under a
quality assurance plan addressing pipe inspection, hauling and string-
ing, field bending, welding, non-destructive examination of girth welds,
applying and testing field applied coating, lowering of the pipeline into
the ditch, padding and backfilling, and hydrostatic testing.
(2) The quality assurance plan for applying and testing field applied
coating to girth welds must be:
(i) Equivalent to that required under 192.112(f)(3) for pipe; and
(ii) Performed by an individual with the knowledge, skills, and abil-
ity to assure effective coating application.
(b) Girth welds. (1) All girth welds on a new pipeline segment must be non- destructive-
ly examined in accordance with 192.243(b) and (c).
(c) Depth of cover. (1) Notwithstanding any lesser depth of cover otherwise allowed in
192.327, there must be at least 36 inches (914 millimeters) of cover or
equivalent means to protect the pipeline from outside force damage.
(2) In areas where deep tilling or other activities could threaten the
pipeline, the top of the pipeline must be installed at least one foot be-
low the deepest expected penetration of the soil.
(d) Initial strength test- (1) The pipeline segment must not have experienced failures indicative
(d) Each regulator that might release gas (c) Grading for drainage. Where con-
in its operation must be vented to the out- densate in the gas might cause interruption
side atmosphere. in the gas supply to the customer, the ser-
vice line must be graded so as to drain into
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970] the main or into drips at the low points in
the service line.
(d) Protection against piping strain and
192.359 Customer meter installations: external loading. Each service line must be
Operating pressure. installed so as to minimize anticipated pip-
ing strain and external loading.
(a) A meter may not be used at a pres- (e) Installation of service lines into
sure that is more than 67 percent of the buildings. Each underground service line
manufacturer's shell test pressure. installed below grade through the outer
(b) Each newly installed meter manu- foundation wall of a building must:
factured after November 12, 1970, must (1) In the case of a metal service line, be
have been tested to a minimum of 10 p.s.i. protected against corrosion;
(69 kPa) gage. (2) In the case of a plastic service line,
(c) A rebuilt or repaired tinned steel be protected from shearing action and back-
case meter may not be used at a pressure fill settlement; and
that is more than 50 percent of the pressure (3) Be sealed at the foundation wall to
used to test the meter after rebuilding or re- prevent leakage into the building.
pairing. (f) Installation of service lines under
buildings. Where an underground service
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended line is installed under a building:
by Amdt. 192-3, 35 FR 17660, Nov. 17, (1) It must be encased in a gas tight
1970; Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13, conduit;
1998] (2) The conduit and the service line
must, if the service line supplies the build-
ing it underlies, extend into a normally usa-
192.361 Service lines: Installation. ble and accessible part of the building; and,
(3) The space between the conduit and
(a) Depth. Each buried service line the service line must be sealed to prevent
must be installed with at least 12 inches gas leakage into the building and, if the
(305 millimeters) of cover in private proper- conduit is sealed at both ends, a vent line
ty and at least 18 inches (457 millimeters) from the annular space must extend to a
of cover in streets and roads. However, point where gas would not be a hazard, and
where an underground structure prevents extend above grade, terminating in a rain
installation at those depths, the service line and insect resistant fitting.
must be able to withstand any anticipated (g) Locating underground service lines.
external load. Each underground nonmetallic service line
(b) Support and backfill. Each service that is not encased must have a means of
line must be properly supported on undis- locating the pipe that complies with
turbed or well-compacted soil, and material 192.321(e).
used for backfill must be free of materials
that could damage the pipe or its coating.
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended is supported independently of the service
by Amdt. 192-75, 61 FR 18512, Apr. 26, lines.
1996; Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13,
1998; Amdt. 192-93, 68 FR 53895, Sept. [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970]
15, 2003]
(a) Each service line must have a ser- (a) Location. Each service line connec-
vice line valve that meets the applicable re- tion to a main must be located at the top of
quirements of Subparts B and D of this part. the main or, if that is not practical, at the
A valve incorporated in a meter bar, that side of the main, unless a suitable protective
allows the meter to be bypassed, may not be device is installed to minimize the possibili-
used as a service line valve. ty of dust and moisture being carried from
(b) A soft seat service line valve may the main into the service line.
not be used if its ability to control the flow (b) Compression-type connection to
of gas could be adversely affected by expo- main. Each compression-type service line
sure to anticipated heat. to main connection must:
(c) Each service line valve on a high- (1) Be designed and installed to effec-
pressure service line, installed above ground tively sustain the longitudinal pullout or
or in an area where the blowing of gas thrust forces caused by contraction or ex-
would be hazardous, must be designed and pansion of the piping, or by anticipated ex-
constructed to minimize the possibility of ternal or internal loading; and
the removal of the core of the valve with (2) If gaskets are used in connecting the
other than specialized tools. service line to the main connection fitting,
have gaskets that are compatible with the
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970] kind of gas in the system.
(b) If a threaded tap is being inserted, (2) It may terminate above ground level
the requirements of 192.151(b) and (c) and outside the building, if
must also be met. (i) The above ground level part of the
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970] plastic service line is protected against dete-
rioration and external damage; and
(ii) The plastic service line is not used to
192.371 Service lines: Steel. support external loads.
(b) Each plastic service line inside a
Each steel service line to be operated at building must be protected against external
less than 100 p.s.i. (689 kPa) gage must be damage.
constructed of pipe designed for a minimum
of 100 p.s.i. (689 kPa) gage. [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended
by Amdt. 192-78, 61 FR 28770, June 6,
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended 1996]
by Amdt. 192-3, 35 FR 17660, Nov. 17,
1970; Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13,
1998] 192.377 Service lines: Copper
(a) Cast or ductile iron pipe less than 6 [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970]
inches (152 millimeters) in diameter may
not be installed for service lines.
(b) If cast iron pipe or ductile iron pipe 192.379 New service lines not in use.
is installed for use as a service line, the part
of the service line which extends through Each service line that is not placed in
the building wall must be of steel pipe. service upon completion of installation
(c) A cast iron or ductile iron service must comply with one of the following until
line may not be installed in unstable soil or the customer is supplied with gas:
under a building. (a) The valve that is closed to prevent
the flow of gas to the customer must be
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended provided with a locking device or other
by Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13, means designed to prevent the opening of
1998] the valve by persons other than those autho-
rized by the operator.
(b) A mechanical device or fitting that
192.375 Service lines: Plastic. will prevent the flow of gas must be in-
stalled in the service line or in the meter
(a) Each plastic service line outside a assembly.
building must be installed below ground (c) The customer's piping must be phys-
level, except that ically disconnected from the gas supply and
(1) It may be installed in accordance the open pipe ends sealed.
with 192.321(g); and
[Amdt. 192-8, 37 FR 20694, Oct. 1972]
192.381 Service lines: Excess flow valve connecting the service line to its source of
performance standards. gas supply.
(e) An operator should not install an
(a) Excess flow valves to be used on excess flow valve on a service line where
single residence service lines that operate the operator has prior experience with con-
continuously throughout the year at a pres- taminants in the gas stream, where these
sure not less than 10 p.s.i. (69 kPa) gage contaminants could be expected to cause the
must be manufactured and tested by the excess flow valve to malfunction or where
manufacturer according to an industry spe- the excess flow valve would interfere with
cification, or the manufacturer's written necessary operation and maintenance activi-
specification, to ensure that each valve will: ties on the service, such as blowing liquids
(1) Function properly up to the maxi- from the line.
mum operating pressure at which the valve
is rated; [Amdt. 192-79, 61 FR 31449, June 20, 1996
(2) Function properly at all temperatures as amended by Amdt. 192-80, 62 FR 2618,
reasonably expected in the operating envi- Jan. 17, 1997; Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500,
ronment of the service line; July 13, 1998]
(3) At 10 p.s.i. (69 kPa) gage:
(i) Close at, or not more than 50 percent
above, the rated closure flow rate specified 192.383 Excess flow valve installation
by the manufacturer; and customer notification
(ii) Upon closure, reduce gas flow
(A) For an excess flow valve designed (a) Definitions. As used in this section:
to allow pressure to equalize across the Replaced service line means a natural
valve, to no more than 5 percent of the gas service line where the fitting that con-
manufacturer's specified closure flow rate, nects the service line to the main is replaced
up to a maximum of 20 cubic feet per hour or the piping connected to this fitting is re-
(0.57 cubic meters per hour); or placed.
(B) For an excess flow valve designed Service line serving single-family resi-
to prevent equalization of pressure across dence means a natural gas service line that
the valve, to no more than 0.4 cubic feet per begins at the fitting that connects the service
hour (.01 cubic meters per hour); and line to the main and serves only one single-
family residence.
(4) Not close when the pressure is less
(b) Installation required. An excess flow
than the manufacturer's minimum specified
valve (EFV) installation must comply with
operating pressure and the flow rate is be-
the performance standards in 192.381. The
low the manufacturer's minimum specified
operator must install an EFV on any new or
closure flow rate.
replaced service line serving a single-family
(b) An excess flow valve must meet the
residence after February 12, 2010, unless
applicable requirements of Subparts B and
one or more of the following conditions is
D of this part.
present:
(c) An operator must mark or otherwise
(1) The service line does not operate at a
identify the presence of an excess flow
pressure of 10 psig or greater throughout the
valve on the service line.
year;
(d) An operator shall locate an excess
(2) The operator has prior experience
flow valve as near as practical to the fitting
with contaminants in the gas stream that
could interfere with the EFV's operation or (c) What to put in the written notice.
cause loss of service to a residence; (1) An explanation for the customer that
(3) An EFV could interfere with neces- an excess flow valve meeting the perfor-
sary operation or maintenance activities, mance standards prescribed under 192.381
such as blowing liquids from the line; or is available for the operator to install if the
(4) An EFV meeting performance stan- customer bears the costs associated with
dards in 192.381 is not commercially installation;
available to the operator. (2) An explanation for the customer of
(c) Reporting. Each operator must, on an the potential safety benefits that may be de-
annual basis, report the number of EFVs in- rived from installing an excess flow valve.
stalled pursuant to this section as part of the The explanation must include that an excess
annual report required by 191.11. flow valve is designed to shut off the flow
(c) Reporting. Each operator must report of natural gas automatically if the service
the EFV measures detailed in the annual re- line breaks;
port required by 191.11. (3) A description of installation, main-
tenance, and replacement costs. The notice
(a) Definitions. As used in this section: must explain that if the customer requests
the operator to install an EFV, the customer
Costs associated with installation bears all costs associated with installation,
means the costs directly connected with in- and what those costs are. The notice must
stalling an excess flow valve, for example, alert the customer that costs for maintaining
costs of parts, labor, inventory and pro- and replacing an EFV may later be incurred,
curement. It does not include maintenance and what those costs will be, to the extent
and replacement costs until such costs are known.
incurred. (d) When notification and installation
must be made.
Replaced service line means a natural (1) After February 3, 1999 an operator
gas service line where the fitting that con- must notify each service line customer set
nects the service line to the main is replaced forth in paragraph (b) of this section:
or the piping connected to this fitting is re- (i) On new service lines when the cus-
placed. tomer applies for service.
(ii) On replaced service lines when the
Service line customer means the person operator determines the service line will be
who pays the gas bill, or where service has replaced.
not yet been established, the person request- (2) If a service line customer requests
ing service. installation an operator must install the EFV
at a mutually agreeable date.
(b) Which customers must receive noti- (e) What records are required.
fication. Notification is required on each (1) An operator must make the follow-
newly installed service line or replaced ser- ing records available for inspection by the
vice line that operates continuously Administrator or a State agency participat-
throughout the year at a pressure not less ing under 49 U.S.C. 60105 or 60106:
than 68.9 m (10 psig) and that serves a sin- (i) A copy of the notice currently in use,
gle residence. On these lines an operator of and
a natural gas distribution system must noti- (ii) Evidence that notice has been sent to
fy the service line customer once in writing. the service line customers set forth in para-
[Amdt. 192-4, 36 FR 12297, June 30, 1971, [Amdt. 192-4, 36 FR 12297, June 30, 1971,
as amended by Amdt. 192-27, 41 FR as amended by Amdt. 192-30, 42 FR
34598, Aug. 16, 1976; Amdt. 192-33, 43 60146, Nov. 25, 1977, Amdt. 192-102, 71
FR 39389, Sept. 5, 1978] FR 13289, Mar. 15, 2006]
dance with this subpart in areas in which (1) Be applied on a properly prepared
active corrosion is found: surface;
(1) Bare or ineffectively coated trans- (2) Have sufficient adhesion to the met-
mission lines. al surface to effectively resist underfilm mi-
(2) Bare or coated pipes at compressor, gration of moisture;
regulator, and measuring stations. (3) Be sufficiently ductile to resist
(3) Bare or coated distribution lines. cracking;
(4) Have sufficient strength to resist
[Amdt. 192-4, 36 FR 12297, June 30, 1971, damage due to handling and soil stress; and,
as amended by Amdt. 192-33, 43 FR (5) Have properties compatible with any
39389, Sept. 5, 1978; Amdt. 192-93, 68 FR supplemental cathodic protection.
53895, Sept. 15, 2003] (b) Each external protective coating
which is an electrically insulating type must
also have low moisture absorption and high
192.459 External corrosion control: electrical resistance.
Examination of buried pipeline when ex- (c) Each external protective coating
posed. must be inspected just prior to lowering the
pipe into the ditch and backfilling, and any
Whenever an operator has knowledge damage detrimental to effective corrosion
that any portion of a buried pipeline is ex- control must be repaired.
posed, the exposed portion must be ex- (d) Each external protective coating
amined for evidence of external corrosion if must be protected from damage resulting
the pipe is bare, or if the coating is deteri- from adverse ditch conditions or damage
orated. If external corrosion requiring re- from supporting blocks.
medial action under 192.483 through (e) If coated pipe is installed by boring,
192.489 is found, the operator shall investi- driving, or other similar method, precau-
gate circumferentially and longitudinally tions must be taken to minimize damage to
beyond the exposed portion (by visual ex- the coating during installation.
amination, indirect method, or both) to de-
termine whether additional corrosion requir- [Amdt. 192-4, 36 FR 12297, June 30, 1971]
ing remedial action exists in the vicinity of
the exposed portion.
192.463 External corrosion control:
[Amdt. 192-4, 36 FR 12297, June 30, 1971, Cathodic protection.
as amended by Amdt. 192-87, 64 FR
56978, Oct. 22, 1999] (a) Each cathodic protection system re-
quired by this subpart must provide a level
of cathodic protection that complies with
192.461 External corrosion control: one or more of the applicable criteria con-
Protective coating. tained in Appendix D of this part. If none
of these criteria is applicable, the cathodic
(a) Each external protective coating, protection system must provide a level of
whether conductive or insulating, applied cathodic protection at least equal to that
for the purpose of external corrosion control provided by compliance with one or more
must of these criteria.
(b) If amphoteric metals are included in failure would jeopardize structure protec-
a buried or submerged pipeline containing a tion must be electrically checked for proper
metal or different anodic potential performance six times each calendar year,
(1) The amphoteric metals must be elec- but with intervals not exceeding 2 months.
trically isolated from the remainder of the Each other interference bond must be
pipeline and cathodically protected; or checked at least once each calendar year,
(2) The entire buried or submerged but with intervals not exceeding 15 months.
pipeline must be cathodically protected at a (d) Each operator shall take prompt re-
cathodic potential that meets the require- medial action to correct any deficiencies
ments of Appendix D of this part for am- indicated by the monitoring.
photeric metals. (e) After the initial evaluation required
(c) The amount of cathodic protection by 192.455(b) and (c) and 192.457(b),
must be controlled so as not to damage the each operator must, not less than every 3
protective coating or the pipe. years at intervals not exceeding 39 months,
reevaluate its unprotected pipelines and ca-
[Amdt. 192-4, 36 FR 12297, June 30, 1971] thodically protect them in accordance with
this subpart in areas in which active corro-
sion is found. The operator must determine
192.465 External corrosion control: the areas of active corrosion by electrical
Monitoring. survey. However, on distribution lines and
where an electrical survey is impractical on
(a) Each pipeline that is under cathodic transmission lines, areas of active corrosion
protection must be tested at least once each may be determined by other means that in-
calendar year, but with intervals not exceed- clude review and analysis of leak repair and
ing 15 months, to determine whether the inspection records, corrosion monitoring
cathodic protection meets the requirements records, exposed pipe inspection records,
of 192.463. However, if tests at those in- and the pipeline environment. In this sec-
tervals are impractical for separately pro- tion:
tected short sections of mains or transmis- (1) Active corrosion means continuing
sion lines, not in excess of 100 feet (30 me- corrosion which, unless controlled, could
ters), or separately protected service lines, result in a condition that is detrimental to
these pipelines may be surveyed on a sam- public safety.
pling basis. At least 10 percent of these (2) Electrical survey means a series of
protected structures, distributed over the closely spaced pipe-to-soil readings over a
entire system must be surveyed each calen- pipeline that are subsequently analyzed to
dar year, with a different 10 percent identify locations where a corrosive current
checked each subsequent year, so that the is leaving the pipeline.
entire system is tested in each 10-year pe- (3) Pipeline environment includes soil
riod. resistivity (high or low), soil moisture (wet
(b) Each cathodic protection rectifier or or dry), soil contaminants that may promote
other impressed current power source must corrosive activity, and other known condi-
be inspected six times each calendar year, tions that could affect the probability of ac-
but with intervals not exceeding 2 months, tive corrosion.
to insure that it is operating.
(c) Each reverse current switch, each [Amdt. 192-4, 36 FR 12297, June 30, 1971,
diode, and each interference bond whose as amended by Amdt. 192-27, 41 FR
34598, Aug. 16, 1976; Amdt. 192-33, 43 [Amdt. 192-4, 36 FR 12297, June 30, 1971,
FR 39389, Sept. 5, 1978; Amdt. 192-35, 44 as amended by Amdt. 192-33, 43 FR
FR 75381, Dec. 20, 1979; Amdt. 192-35A, 39389, Sept. 5, 1978]
45 FR 23441, Apr. 7, 1980; Amdt. 192-85,
63 FR 37500, July 13, 1998; Amdt. 192-93,
68 FR 53895, Sept. 15, 2003] ; Amdt. 192- 192.469 External corrosion control:
114, 74 FR 48593, Aug 11, 2010 Test stations.
(b) Each impressed current type cathod- 192.476 Internal corrosion control: De-
ic protection system or galvanic anode sys- sign and construction of transmission
tem must be designed and installed so as to line.
minimize any adverse effects on existing
adjacent underground metallic structures. (a) Design and construction. Except as
provided in paragraph (b) of this section,
[Amdt. 192-4, 36 FR 12297, June 30, 1971, each new transmission line and each re-
as amended by Amdt. 192-33, 43 FR placement of line pipe, valve, fitting, or oth-
39389, Sept. 5, 1978] er line component in a transmission line
must have features incorporated into its de-
sign and construction to reduce the risk of
192.475 Internal corrosion control: internal corrosion. At a minimum, unless it
General. is impracticable or unnecessary to do so,
each new transmission line or replacement
(a) Corrosive gas may not be trans- of line pipe, valve, fitting, or other line
ported by pipeline, unless the corrosive ef- component in a transmission line must:
fect of the gas on the pipeline has been in- (1) Be configured to reduce the risk that
vestigated and steps have been taken to mi- liquids will collect in the line;
nimize internal corrosion. (2) Have effective liquid removal fea-
(b) Whenever any pipe is removed from tures whenever the configuration would al-
a pipeline for any reason, the internal sur- low liquids to collect; and
face must be inspected for evidence of cor- (3) Allow use of devices for monitoring
rosion. If internal corrosion is found internal corrosion at locations with signifi-
(1) The adjacent pipe must be investi- cant potential for internal corrosion.
gated to determine the extent of internal (b) Exceptions to applicability. The de-
corrosion: sign and construction requirements of para-
(2) Replacement must be made to the graph (a) of this section do not apply to the
extent required by the applicable paragraphs following:
of 192.485, 192.487, or 192,489; and, (1) Offshore pipeline; and
(3) Steps must be taken to minimize the (2) Pipeline installed or line pipe, valve,
internal corrosion. fitting or other line component replaced be-
(c) Gas containing more than 0.25 grain fore May 23, 2007.
of hydrogen sulfide per 100 cubic feet (5.8 (c) Change to existing transmission line.
milligrams/m3) at standard conditions (4 When an operator changes the configuration
parts per million) may not be stored in pipe- of a transmission line, the operator must
type or bottle-type holders. evaluate the impact of the change on internal
corrosion risk to the downstream portion of
[Amdt. 192-4, 36 FR 12297, June 30, 1971, an existing onshore transmission line and
as amended by Amdt. 192-33, 43 FR provide for removal of liquids and monitor-
39389, Sept. 5, 1978; Amdt. 192-78, 61 FR ing of internal corrosion as appropriate.
28770, June 6, 1996; Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR (d) Records. An operator must maintain
37500, July 13, 1998] records demonstrating compliance with this
section. Provided the records show why in-
corporating design features addressing para-
graph (a)(1), (a)(2), or (a)(3) of this section
is impracticable or unnecessary, an operator
may fulfill this requirement through written [Amdt. 192-4, 36 FR 12297, June 30, 1971,
procedures supported by as-built drawings as amended by Amdt. 192-33, 43 FR
or other construction records. 39389, Sept. 5, 1978; Amdt. 192-93, 68 FR
53895, Sept. 15, 2003]
[72 FR 20055, April 23, 2007]
face and must be provided with an external mined by the procedure in ASME/ANSI
protective coating that meets the require- B31G or the procedure in AGA Pipeline
ments of 192.461. Research Committee Project PR 3-805
(b) Each segment of metallic pipe that (with RSTRENG disk). Both procedures
replaces pipe removed from a buried or apply to corroded regions that do not pene-
submerged pipeline because of external cor- trate the pipe wall, subject to the limitations
rosion must be cathodically protected in ac- prescribed in the procedures.
cordance with this subpart.
(c) Except for cast iron or ductile iron [Amdt. 192-4, 36 FR 12297, June 30, 1971,
pipe, each segment of buried or submerged as amended by Amdt. 192-33, 43 FR
pipe that is required to be repaired because 39389, Sept. 5, 1978; Amdt. 192-78, 61 FR
of external corrosion must be cathodically 28770, June 6, 1996; Amdt. 192-88, 64 FR
protected in accordance with this subpart. 69660, Dec. 14, 1999]
192.489 Remedial measures: Cast iron [Amdt. 192-102, 70 FR 61571, Oct. 25,
and ductile iron pipelines. 2005]
line, a strength test after installation is not (b) If, during the test, the segment is to
required, if the manufacturer of the compo- be stressed to 20 percent or more of SMYS
nent certifies that and natural gas, inert gas, or air is the test
(1) The component was tested to at least medium
the pressure required for the pipeline to (1) A leak test must be made at a pres-
which it is being added; sure between 100 p.s.i. (689 kPa) gage and
(2) The component was manufactured the pressure required to produce a hoop
under a quality control system that ensures stress of 20 percent of SMYS; or
that each item manufactured is at least equal (2) The line must be walked to check for
in strength to a prototype and that the proto- leaks while the hoop stress is held at ap-
type was tested to at least the pressure re- proximately 20 percent of SMYS.
quired for the pipeline to which it is being (c) The pressure must be maintained at
added; or or above the test pressure for at least 1 hour.
(3) The component carries a pressure
rating established through applicable [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended
ASME/ANSI, MSS specifications, or by by Amdt. 192-58, 53 FR 1633, Jan. 21,
unit strength calculations as described in 1988; Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13,
192.143. 1998]
(e) For fabricated units and short sec-
tions of pipe, for which a post installation
test is impractical, a preinstallation strength 192.509 Test requirements for pipelines
test must be conducted by maintaining the to operate below 100 p.s.i. (689 kPa)
pressure for at least 4 hours. gage.
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended Except for service lines and plastic pipe-
by Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13, lines, each segment of a pipeline that is to
1998; Amdt. 192-94, 69 FR 32886, June 14, be operated below 100 p.s.i. (689 kPa) gage
2004; Amdt. 192-94A, 69 FR 54591, Sept. must be leak tested in accordance with the
9, 2004] following:
(a) The test procedure used must ensure
discovery of all potentially hazardous leaks
192.507 Test requirements for pipelines in the segment being tested.
to operate at a hoop stress less than 30 (b) Each main that is to be operated at
percent of SMYS and at or above 100 less than 1 p.s.i. (6.9 kPa) gage must be
p.s.i. (689 kPa) gage. tested to at least 10 p.s.i. (69 kPa) gage and
each main to be operated at or above 1 p.s.i.
Except for service lines and plastic pipe- (6.9 kPa) gage must be tested to at least 90
lines, each segment of a pipeline that is to p.s.i. (621 kPa) gage.
be operated at a hoop stress less than 30
percent of SMYS and at or above 100 p.s.i. [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended
(689 kPa) gage must be tested in accor- by Amdt. 192-58, 53 FR 1633, Jan. 21,
dance with the following: 1988; Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13,
(a) The pipeline operator must use a test 1998]
procedure that will ensure discovery of all
potentially hazardous leaks in the segment
being tested.
192.511 Test requirements for service times the pressure determined under
lines. 192.121, at a temperature not less than the
pipe temperature during the test.
(a) Each segment of a service line (other (d) During the test, the temperature of
than plastic) must be leak tested in accor- thermoplastic material may not be more
dance with this section before being placed than 100 F (38 C), or the temperature at
in service. If feasible, the service line con- which the material's long-term hydrostatic
nection to the main must be included in the strength has been determined under the
test; if not feasible, it must be given a lea- listed specification, whichever is greater.
kage test at the operating pressure when
placed in service. [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended
(b) Each segment of a service line (other by Amdt. 192-77, 61 FR 27789, June 3,
than plastic) intended to be operated at a 1996; Amdt. 192-77A, 61 FR 45905, Aug.
pressure of at least 1 p.s.i. (6.9 kPa) gage 30, 1996; Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July
but not more than 40 p.s.i. (276 kPa) gage 13, 1998 ]
must be given a leak test at a pressure of not
less than 50 p.s.i. (345 kPa) gage.
(c) Each segment of a service line (other 192.515 Environmental protection and
than plastic) intended to be operated at safety requirements.
pressures of more than 40 p.s.i. (276 kPa)
gage must be tested to at least 90 p.s.i. (621 (a) In conducting tests under this sub-
kPa) gage, except that each segment of the part, each operator shall insure that every
steel service line stressed to 20 percent or reasonable precaution is taken to protect its
more of SMYS must be tested in accor- employees and the general public during the
dance with 192.507 of this subpart. testing. Whenever the hoop stress of the
segment of the pipeline being tested will
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended exceed 50 percent of SMYS, the operator
by Amdt. 192-75, 61 FR 18512, Apr. 26, shall take all practicable steps to keep per-
1996; Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13, sons not working on the testing operation
1998] outside of the testing area until the pressure
is reduced to or below the proposed maxi-
mum allowable operating pressure.
192.513 Test requirements for plastic (b) The operator shall insure that the test
pipelines. medium is disposed of in a manner that will
minimize damage to the environment.
(a) Each segment of a plastic pipeline
must be tested in accordance with this sec- [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970]
tion.
(b) The test procedure must insure dis-
covery of all potentially hazardous leaks in 192.517 Records.
the segment being tested.
(c) The test pressure must be at least (a) Each operator shall make, and retain
150 percent of the maximum operating for the useful life of the pipeline, a record of
pressure or 50 p.s.i. (345 kPa) gage, whi- each test performed under 192.505 and
chever is greater. However, the maximum 192.507. The record must contain at least
test pressure may not be more than three the following information:
sure delivered to the customer, install a ser- increased by the allowance indicated in the
vice regulator on each service line and test following table:
each regulator to determine that it is func-
tioning. Pressure may be increased as ne- Allowance (inches) (millimeters)
cessary to test each regulator, after a regula- Pipe size Cast iron pipe Ductile
tor has been installed on each pipeline sub- (inches) Pit cast Centrifugally iron
(millimeters) pipe cast pipe pipe
ject to the increased pressure. 3 to 8 0.075 0.065 0.065
(c) After complying with paragraph (b) (76 to 203) (1.91) (1.65) (1.65)
of this section, the increase in maximum 10 to 12 0.080 0.070 0.070
allowable operating pressure must be made (254 to 305) (2.03) (1.91) (1.91)
in increments that are equal to 10 p.s.i. (69 14 to 24 0.080 0.080 0.075
kPa) gage or 25 percent of the total pressure (356 to 610) (2.03) (2.03) (1.91)
30 to 42 0.090 0.090 0.075
increase, whichever produces the fewer (762 to 1067) (2.29) (2.29) (1.91)
number of increments. Whenever the re- 48 0.090 0.090 0.080
quirements of paragraph (b)(6) of this sec- (1219) (2.29) (2.29) (2.03)
tion apply, there must be at least two ap- 54 to 60 0.090
proximately equal incremental increases. (1372 to 1524) (2.29)
(d) If records for cast iron or ductile iron
pipeline facilities are not complete enough (4) For cast iron pipe, unless the pipe
to determine stresses produced by internal manufacturing process is known, the opera-
pressure, trench loading, rolling loads, beam tor shall assume that the pipe is pit cast pipe
stresses, and other bending loads, in eva- with a bursting tensile strength of 11,000
luating the level of safety of the pipeline p.s.i. (76 MPa) gage and a modulus of rup-
when operating at the proposed increased ture of 31,000 p.s.i. (214 MPa) gage.
pressure, the following procedures must be
followed: [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended
(1) In estimating the stress, if the origi- by Amdt. 192-37, 46 FR 10157, Feb. 2,
nal laying conditions cannot be ascertained, 1981; Amdt. 192-62, 54 FR 5625, Feb. 6,
the operator shall assume that cast iron pipe 1989; Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13,
was supported on blocks with tamped back- 1998]
fill and that ductile iron pipe was laid with-
out blocks with tamped backfill.
(2) Unless the actual maximum cover
depth is known, the operator shall measure
the actual cover in at least three places
where the cover is most likely to be greatest
and shall use the greatest cover measured.
(3) Unless the actual nominal wall
thickness is known, the operator shall de-
termine the wall thickness by cutting and
measuring coupons from at least three sepa-
rate pipe lengths. The coupons must be cut
from pipe lengths in areas where the cover
depth is most likely to be the greatest. The
average of all measurements taken must be
tenance and modifying the procedure when (iv) Operation of any safety device; and,
deficiencies are found. (v) Any other foreseeable malfunction
(9) Taking adequate precautions in ex- of a component, deviation from normal op-
cavated trenches to protect personnel from eration, or personnel error which may result
the hazards of unsafe accumulations of va- in a hazard to persons or property.
por or gas, and making available when (2) Checking variations from normal
needed at the excavation, emergency rescue operation after abnormal operation has
equipment, including a breathing apparatus ended at sufficient critical locations in the
and, a rescue harness and line. system to determine continued integrity and
(10) Systematic and routine testing and safe operation.
inspection of pipe-type or bottle-type hold- (3) Notifying responsible operator per-
ers including sonnel when notice of an abnormal opera-
(i) Provision for detecting external cor- tion is received.
rosion before the strength of the container (4) Periodically reviewing the response
has been impaired; of operator personnel to determine the ef-
(ii) Periodic sampling and testing of gas fectiveness of the procedures controlling
in storage to determine the dew point of va- abnormal operation and taking corrective
pors contained in the stored gas which, if action where deficiencies are found.
condensed, might cause internal corrosion (5) The requirements of this paragraph
or interfere with the safe operation of the (c) do not apply to natural gas distribution
storage plant; and, operators that are operating transmission
(iii) Periodic inspection and testing of lines in connection with their distribution
pressure limiting equipment to determine system.
that it is in safe operating condition and has (d) Safety-related condition reports.
adequate capacity. The manual required by paragraph (a) of
(11) Responding promptly to a report of this section must include instructions enabl-
a gas odor inside or near a building, unless ing personnel who perform operation and
the operator's emergency procedures under maintenance activities to recognize condi-
192.615(a)(3) specifically apply to these tions that potentially may be safety-related
reports. conditions that are subject to the reporting
(12) Implementing the applicable con- requirements of 191.23 of this subchapter.
trol room management procedures required (e) Surveillance, emergency response,
by 192.631. and accident investigation. The procedures
(c) Abnormal operation. For transmis- required by 192.613(a), 192.615, and
sion lines, the manual required by para- 192.617 must be included in the manual re-
graph (a) of this section must include pro- quired by paragraph (a) of this section
cedures for the following to provide safety
when operating design limits have been ex- [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended
ceeded: by Amdt. 192-59, 53 FR 24942, July
(1) Responding to, investigating, and 1,1988; Amdt. 192-59C, 53 FR 26560, July
correcting the cause of: 13, 1988; Amdt. 192-71, 59 FR 6579, Feb.
(i) Unintended closure of valves or 11, 1994; Amdt. 192-71A, 60 FR 14381,
shutdowns; Mar. 17, 1995; Amdt. 192-93, 68 FR
(ii) Increase or decrease in pressure or 53895, Sept. 15, 2003: Amdt. 192-112, 74
flow rate outside normal operating limits; FR 63310, Dec. 3, 2009]
(iii) Loss of communications;
then be established according to the follow- [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended
ing criteria: by Amdt. 192-5, 36 FR 18195, Sept. 10,
(i) The maximum allowable operating 1971; Amdt. 192-53, 51 FR 34987, Oct. 1,
pressure after the requalification test is 0.8 1986; Amdt. 192-63, 54 FR 24173, June 6,
times the test pressure for Class 2 locations, 1989; Amdt. 192-78, 61 FR 28770, June 6,
0.667 times the test pressure for Class 3 lo- 1996; Amdt. 192-94, 69 FR 32886, June 14,
cations, and 0.555 times the test pressure 2004; Amdt. 192-[107], 73 FR 62147, Oc-
for Class 4 locations. tober 17, 2008]
(ii) The corresponding hoop stress may
not exceed 72 percent of the SMYS of the
pipe in Class 2 locations, 60 percent of 192.612 Underwater inspection and re-
SMYS in Class 3 locations, or 50 percent of burial of pipelines in the Gulf of Mexico
SMYS in Class 4 locations. and its inlets.
(iii) For pipeline operating at an alterna-
tive maximum allowable operating pressure (a) Each operator shall prepare and fol-
per 192.620, the alternative maximum al- low a procedure to identify its pipelines in
lowable operating pressure after the requali- the Gulf of Mexico and its inlets in waters
fication test is 0.8 times the test pressure for less than 15 feet (4.6 meters) deep as meas-
Class 2 locations and 0.667 times the test ured from mean low water that are at risk of
pressure for Class 3 locations. The corres- being an exposed underwater pipeline or a
ponding hoop stress may not exceed 80 per- hazard to navigation. The procedures must
cent of the SMYS of the pipe in Class 2 lo- be in effect August 10, 2005.
cations and 67 percent of SMYS in Class 3 (b) Each operator shall conduct appro-
locations. priate periodic underwater inspections of its
(b) The maximum allowable operating pipelines in the Gulf of Mexico and its inlets
pressure confirmed or revised in accordance in waters less than 15 feet (4.6 meters) deep
with this section, may not exceed the max- as measured from mean low water based on
imum allowable operating pressure estab- the identified risk.
lished before the confirmation or revision. (c) If an operator discovers that its pipe-
(c) Confirmation or revision of the max- line is an exposed underwater pipeline or
imum allowable operating pressure of a poses a hazard to navigation, the operator
segment of pipeline in accordance with this shall
section does not preclude the application of (1) Promptly, but not later than 24 hours
192.553 and 192.555. after discovery, notify the National Re-
(d) Confirmation or revision of the max- sponse Center, telephone: 1-800-424-8802,
imum allowable operating pressure that is of the location and, if available, the geo-
required as a result of a study under graphic coordinates of that pipeline.
192.609 must be completed within 24 (2) Promptly, but not later than 7 days
months of the change in class location. after discovery, mark the location of the
Pressure reduction under paragraph (a) (1) pipeline in accordance with 33 CFR part 64
or (2) of this section within the 24-month at the ends of the pipeline segment and at
period does not preclude establishing a intervals of not over 500 yards (457 meters)
maximum allowable operating pressure un- long, except that a pipeline segment less
der paragraph (a)(3) of this section at a later than 200 yards (183 meters) long need only
date. be marked at the center; and
to have a part in management responsibili- (ii) In the case of blasting, any inspec-
ties; and tion must include leakage surveys.
(iii) Assesses a participating pipeline (d) A damage prevention program under
operator a fee that is proportionate to the this section is not required for the following
costs of the one-call systems coverage of pipelines:
the operators pipeline. (1) Pipelines located offshore.
(c) The damage prevention program re- (2) Pipelines, other than those located
quired by paragraph (a) of this section must, offshore, in Class 1 or 2 locations until Sep-
at a minimum: tember 20, 1995.
(1) Include the identity, on a current ba- (3) Pipelines to which access is physi-
sis, of persons who normally engage in ex- cally controlled by the operator.
cavation activities in the area in which the (e) Pipelines operated by persons other
pipeline is located. than municipalities (including operators of
(2) Provides for notification of the pub- master meters) whose primary activity does
lic in the vicinity of the pipeline and actual not include the transportation of gas need
notification of the persons identified in pa- not comply with the following:
ragraph (c)(1) of this section of the follow- (1) The requirement of paragraph (a) of
ing as often as needed to make them aware this section that the damage prevention pro-
of the damage prevention program: gram be written; and
(i) The program's existence and pur- (2) The requirements of paragraphs
pose; and (c)(1) and (c)(2) of this section.
(ii) How to learn the location of under-
ground pipelines before excavation activi- [Amdt. 192-40, 47 FR 13818, Apr. 1, 1982;
ties are begun. Amdt. 192-57, 52 FR 32798, Aug. 31,
(3) Provide a means of receiving and 1987; Amdt. 192-73, 60 FR 14646, Mar.
recording notification of planned excavation 20, 1995; Amdt. 192-78, 61 FR 28770, June
activities. 6, 1996; Amdt. 192-82, 62 FR 61695, Nov.
(4) If the operator has buried pipelines 19, 1997; Amdt. 192-84, 63 FR 7721, Feb.
in the area of excavation activity, provide 17, 1998; Amdt. 192-84A, 63 FR 38757,
for actual notification of persons who give July 20, 1998]
notice of their intent to excavate of the type
of temporary marking to be provided and
how to identify the markings. 192.615 Emergency plans.
(5) Provide for temporary marking of
buried pipelines in the area of excavation (a) Each operator shall establish written
activity before, as far as practical, the ac- procedures to minimize the hazard resulting
tivity begins. from a gas pipeline emergency. At a mini-
(6) Provide as follows for inspection of mum, the procedures must provide for the
pipelines that an operator has reason to be- following:
lieve could be damaged by excavation ac- (1) Receiving, identifying, and classify-
tivities: ing notices of events which require imme-
(i) The inspection must be done as fre- diate response by the operator.
quently as necessary during and after the (2) Establishing and maintaining ade-
activities to verify the integrity of the pipe- quate means of communication with appro-
line; and priate fire, police, and other public officials.
(3) Prompt and effective response to a (3) Review employee activities to de-
notice of each type of emergency, including termine whether the procedures were effec-
the following: tively followed in each emergency.
(i) Gas detected inside or near a build- (c) Each operator shall establish and
ing. maintain liaison with appropriate fire, po-
(ii) Fire located near or directly involv- lice, and other public officials to:
ing a pipeline facility. (1) Learn the responsibility and re-
(iii) Explosion occurring near or directly sources of each government organization
involving a pipeline facility. that may respond to a gas pipeline emer-
(iv) Natural disaster. gency;
(4) The availability of personnel, (2) Acquaint the officials with the oper-
equipment, tools, and materials, as needed ator's ability in responding to a gas pipeline
at the scene of an emergency. emergency;
(5) Actions directed toward protecting (3) Identify the types of gas pipeline
people first and then property. emergencies of which the operator notifies
(6) Emergency shutdown and pressure the officials; and,
reduction in any section of the operator's (4) Plan how the operator and officials
pipeline system necessary to minimize ha- can engage in mutual assistance to minim-
zards to life or property. ize hazards to life or property.
(7) Making safe any actual or potential
hazard to life or property. [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970 as amended
(8) Notifying appropriate fire, police, by Amdt. 192-24, 41 FR 13586, Mar. 31,
and other public officials of gas pipeline 1976; Amdt. 192-71, 59 FR 6585, Feb. 11,
emergencies and coordinating with them 1994: Amdt. 192-112, 74 FR 63310, Dec. 3,
both planned responses and actual res- 2009]
ponses during an emergency.
(9) Safely restoring any service outage.
(10) Beginning action under 192.617, 192.616 Public awareness.
if applicable, as soon after the end of the
emergency as possible. (a) Except for an operator of a master
(11) Actions required to be taken by a meter or petroleum gas system covered un-
controller during an emergency in accor- der paragraph (j) of this section, each pipe-
dance with 192.631. line operator must develop and implement a
(b) Each operator shall: written continuing public education program
(1) Furnish its supervisors who are re- that follows the guidance provided in the
sponsible for emergency action a copy of American Petroleum Institute's (API) Rec-
that portion of the latest edition of the ommended Practice (RP) 1162 (IBR, see
emergency procedures established under 192.7).
paragraph (a) of this section as necessary (b) The operator's program must follow
for compliance with those procedures. the general program recommendations of
(2) Train the appropriate operating per- API RP 1162 and assess the unique
sonnel to assure that they are knowledgea- attributes and characteristics of the opera-
ble of the emergency procedures and verify tor's pipeline and facilities.
that the training is effective. (c) The operator must follow the general
program recommendations, including base-
line and supplemental requirements of API
RP 1162, unless the operator provides justi- the appropriate State agency.
fication in its program or procedural manual (i) The operator's program documenta-
as to why compliance with all or certain tion and evaluation results must be available
provisions of the recommended practice is for periodic review by appropriate regulato-
not practicable and not necessary for safety. ry agencies.
(d) The operator's program must specifi- (j) Unless the operator transports gas as
cally include provisions to educate the pub- a primary activity, the operator of a master
lic, appropriate government organizations, meter or petroleum gas system is not re-
and persons engaged in excavation related quired to develop a public awareness pro-
activities on: gram as prescribed in paragraphs (a) through
(1) Use of a one-call notification system (g) of this section. Instead the operator must
prior to excavation and other damage pre- develop and implement a written procedure
vention activities; to provide its customers public awareness
(2) Possible hazards associated with un- messages twice annually. If the master meter
intended releases from a gas pipeline facili- or petroleum gas system is located on prop-
ty; erty the operator does not control, the opera-
(3) Physical indications that such a re- tor must provide similar messages twice an-
lease may have occurred; nually to persons controlling the property.
(4) Steps that should be taken for public The public awareness message must include:
safety in the event of a gas pipeline release; (1) A description of the purpose and re-
and liability of the pipeline;
(5) Procedures for reporting such an (2) An overview of the hazards of the
event. pipeline and prevention measures used;
(e) The program must include activities (3) Information about damage preven-
to advise affected municipalities, school dis- tion;
tricts, businesses, and residents of pipeline (4) How to recognize and respond to a
facility locations. leak; and
(f) The program and the media used (5) How to get additional information.
must be as comprehensive as necessary to
reach all areas in which the operator trans- [Amdt. 192-71, 59 FR 6575, Feb. 11, 1994
ports gas. as amended by Amdt. 192-99, 70 FR
(g) The program must be conducted in 28833, May 19, 2005; Amdt. 192-99A, 70
English and in other languages commonly FR 35041, June 16, 2005; Amdt. 192-[105],
understood by a significant number and con- 72 FR 70808, Dec. 13, 2007]
centration of the non-English speaking pop-
ulation in the operator's area.
(h) Operators in existence on June 20, 192.617 Investigation of failures.
2005, must have completed their written
programs no later than June 20, 2006. The Each operator shall establish procedures
operator of a master meter or petroleum gas for analyzing accidents and failures, includ-
system covered under paragraph (j) of this ing the selection of samples of the failed
section must complete development of its facility or equipment for laboratory exami-
written procedure by June 13, 2008. Upon nation, where appropriate, for the purpose
request, operators must submit their com- of determining the causes of the failure and
pleted programs to PHMSA or, in the case minimizing the possibility of a recurrence.
an intrastate pipeline facility operator, [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970]
192.619 Maximum allowable operating (ii) For steel pipe operated at 100 p.s.i.
pressure: Steel or plastic pipelines. (689 kPa) gage or more, the test pressure is
divided by a factor determined in accor-
dance with the following table:
(a) No person may operate a segment of
1
steel or plastic pipeline at a pressure that Factors , segment
exceeds a maximum allowable operating Class Installed Installed Covered
pressure determined under paragraph (c) or location before after under
(d) of this section, or the lowest of the fol- Nov. 12, Nov. 11, 192.14
1970 1970
lowing: 1 1.1 1.1 1.25
(1) The design pressure of the weakest 2 1.25 1.25 1.25
element in the segment, determined in ac- 3 1.4 1.5 1.5
cordance with Subparts C and D of this 4 1.4 1.5 1.5
1
part. However, for steel pipe in pipelines For offshore segments installed, uprated or con-
being converted under 192.14 or uprated verted after July 31, 1977, that are not located on an
under subpart K of this part, if any variable offshore platform, the factor is 1.25. For segments
necessary to determine the design pressure installed, uprated or converted after July 31, 1977,
that are located on an offshore platform or on a plat-
under the design formula (192.105) is un- form in inland navigable waters, including a pipe
known, one of the following pressures is to riser, the factor is 1.5.
be used as design pressure:
(i) Eighty percent of the first test pres- (3) The highest actual operating pres-
sure that produces yield under section N5 of sure to which the segment was subjected
Appendix N of ASME B31.8 (incorporated during the 5 years preceding the applicable
by reference, see 192.7), reduced by the date in the second column. This pressure
appropriate factor in paragraph (a)(2)(ii) of restriction applies unless the segment was
this section; or tested according to the requirements in pa-
(ii) If the pipe is 12 inches (324 mm) ragraph (a)(2) of this section after the appli-
or less in outside diameter and is not tested cable date in the third column or the seg-
to yield under this paragraph, 200 p.s.i. ment was uprated according to the require-
(1379 kPa) gage. ments in subpart K of this part:
(2) The pressure obtained by dividing
the pressure to which the segment was
tested after construction as follows:
(i) For plastic pipe in all locations, the
test pressure is divided by a factor of 1.5.
sidering the history of the segment, particularly (1) In determining the alternative design
known corrosion and the actual operating pres- pressure under 192.105, use a design factor
sure. determined in accordance with 192.111(b),
(b) No person may operate a segment to (c), or (d) or, if none of these paragraphs apply,
which paragraph (a)(4) of this section is appli- in accordance with the following table:
cable, unless overpressure protective devices
are installed on the segment in a manner that Class Location Alternative design factor
will prevent the maximum allowable operating (F)
pressure from being exceeded, in accordance 1 0.80
with 192.195. 2 0.67
(c) The requirements on pressure restric- 3 0.56
tions in this section do not apply in the follow-
ing instance. An operator may operate a seg- (i) For facilities installed prior to December
ment of pipeline found to be in satisfactory 22November 17, 2008, for which 192.111(b),
condition, considering its operating and main- (c), or (d) apply, use the following design fac-
tenance history, at the highest actual operating tors as alternatives for the factors specified in
pressure to which the segment was subjected those paragraphs: 192.111(b)0.67 or less;
during the 5 years preceding the applicable 192.111(c) and (d)0.56 or less.
date in the second column of the table in para- (ii) [Reserved]
graph (a)(3) of this section. An operator must (2) The alternative maximum allowable op-
still comply with 192.611. erating pressure is the lower of the following:
(d) The operator of a pipeline segment of (i) The design pressure of the weakest ele-
steel pipeline meeting the conditions pre- ment in the pipeline segment, determined under
scribed in 192.620(b) may elect to operate the subparts C and D of this part.
segment at a maximum allowable operating (ii) The pressure obtained by dividing the
pressure determined under 192.620(a). pressure to which the pipeline segment was
tested after construction by a factor determined
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970 as amended by in the following table:
Amdt. 192-3, 35 FR 17559, Nov. 17, 1970;
Amdt. 192-27, 41 FR 34598, Aug. 16, 1976; Class Location Alternative test factor
Amdt. 192-27A, 41 FR 47252, Oct. 28, 1976; 1 1.25
Amdt. 192-30, 42 FR 60146, Nov. 25, 1977; 2 1
1.50
Amdt. 192-78, 61 FR 28770, June 6, 1996; 3 1.50
Amdt 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13, 1998, 1
For Class 2 alternative maximum allowable
Amdt. 192-102, 71 FR 13289, Mar. 15, 2006; operating pressure segments installed prior to
Amdt. 192-103, 71 FR 33402, June 8, 2006; December 22November 17, 2008, the alterna-
Amdt. 192-[107], 73 FR 62147, October 17, tive test factor is 1.25.
2008]
(b) When may an operator use the alterna-
tive maximum allowable operating pressure
192.620 Alternative maximum allowable calculated under paragraph (a) of this section?
operating pressure for certain steel pipelines. An operator may use an alternative maximum
allowable operating pressure calculated under
(a) How does an operator calculate the al- paragraph (a) of this section if the following
ternative maximum allowable operating pres- conditions are met:
sure? An operator calculates the alternative (1) The pipeline segment is in a Class 1, 2,
maximum allowable operating pressure by us- or 3 location;
ing different factors in the same formulas used (2) The pipeline segment is constructed of
for calculating maximum allowable operating steel pipe meeting the additional design re-
pressure under 192.619(a) as follows: quirements in 192.112;
Revision 4/09 Current thru 192-110 92/157
PART 192 TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
(3) A supervisory control and data acquisi- (2) Certify, by signature of a senior execu-
tion system provides remote monitoring and tive officer of the company, as follows:
control of the pipeline segment. The control (i) The pipeline segment meets the condi-
provided must include monitoring of pressures tions described in paragraph (b) of this section;
and flows, monitoring compressor start-ups and and
shut-downs, and remote closure of valves per (ii) The operating and maintenance proce-
paragraph (d)(3) of this section; dures include the additional operating and
(4) The pipeline segment meets the addi- maintenance requirements of paragraph (d) of
tional construction requirements described in this section; and
192.328; (iii) The review and any needed program
(5) The pipeline segment does not contain upgrade of the damage prevention program re-
any mechanical couplings used in place of girth quired by paragraph (d)(4)(v) of this section has
welds; been completed.
(6) If a pipeline segment has been previous- (3) Send a copy of the certification required
ly operated, the segment has not experienced by paragraph (c)(2) of this section to each
any failure during normal operations indicative PHMSA pipeline safety regional office where
of a systemic fault in material as determined by the pipeline is in service 30 days prior to oper-
a root cause analysis, including metallurgical ating at the alternative MAOP. An operator
examination of the failed pipe. The results of must also send a copy to a State pipeline safety
this root cause analysis must be reported to authority when the pipeline is located in a State
each PHMSA pipeline safety regional office where PHMSA has an interstate agent agree-
where the pipeline is in service at least 60 days ment, or an intrastate pipeline is regulated by
prior to operation at the alternative MAOP. An that State.
operator must also notify a State pipeline safety (4) For each pipeline segment, do one of the
authority when the pipeline is located in a State following:
where PHMSA has an interstate agent agree- (i) Perform a strength test as described in
ment, or an intrastate pipeline is regulated by 192.505 at a test pressure calculated under pa-
that State; and ragraph (a) of this section or
(7) At least 95 percent of girth welds on a (ii) For a pipeline segment in existence
segment that was constructed prior to Decem- prior to December 22November 17, 2008, certi-
ber 22November 17, 2008, must have been fy, under paragraph (c)(2) of this section, that
non-destructively examined in accordance with the strength test performed under 192.505 was
192.243(b) and (c). conducted at a test pressure calculated under
(c) What is an operator electing to use the paragraph (a) of this section, or conduct a new
alternative maximum allowable operating pres- strength test in accordance with paragraph
sure required to do? If an operator elects to use (c)(4)(i) of this section.
the alternative maximum allowable operating (5) Comply with the additional operation
pressure calculated under paragraph (a) of this and maintenance requirements described in pa-
section for a pipeline segment, the operator ragraph (d) of this section.
must do each of the following: (6) If the performance of a construction task
(1) Notify each PHMSA pipeline safety re- associated with implementing alternative
gional office where the pipeline is in service of MAOP that occurs after December 22, 2008,
its election with respect to a segment at least can affect the integrity of the pipeline segment,
180 days before operating at the alternative treat that task as a covered task, notwith-
maximum allowable operating pressure. An op- standing the definition in 192.801(b) and im-
erator must also notify a State pipeline safety plement the requirements of subpart N as ap-
authority when the pipeline is located in a State propriate.
where PHMSA has an interstate agent agree- (7) Maintain, for the useful life of the pipe-
ment, or an intrastate pipeline is regulated by line, records demonstrating compliance with
that State. paragraphs (b), (c)(6), and (d) of this section.
(8) A Class 1 and Class 2 pipeline location (d) What additional operation and mainten-
can be upgraded one class due to class changes ance requirements apply to operation at the
per 192.611(a)(3)(i). All class location alternative maximum allowable operating pres-
changes from Class 1 to Class 2 and from Class sure? In addition to compliance with other ap-
2 to Class 3 must have all anomalies evaluated plicable safety standards in this part, if an oper-
and remediated per: The ``original pipeline ator establishes a maximum allowable operat-
class grade'' 192.620(d)(11) anomaly repair ing pressure for a pipeline segment under para-
requirements; and all anomalies with a wall loss graph (a) of this section, an operator must
equal to or greater than 40 percent must be ex- comply with the additional operation and main-
cavated and remediated. Pipelines in Class 4 tenance requirements as follows:
may not operate at an alternative MAOP.
(3) Responding to an emer- (i) Ensure that the identification of high consequence areas reflects the
gency in an area defined as larger potential impact circle recalculated under paragraph (d)(21)(i) of
a high consequence area in this section.
192.903. (ii) If personnel response time to mainline valves on either side of the
high consequence area exceeds one hour (under normal driving condi-
tions and speed limits) from the time the event is identified in the con-
trol room, provide remote valve control through a supervisory control
and data acquisition (SCADA) system, other leak detection system, or
an alternative method of control.
(iii) Remote valve control must include the ability to close and monitor
the valve position (open or closed), and monitor pressure upstream and
downstream.(iv) A line break valve control system using differential
pressure, rate of pressure drop or other widely-accepted method is an
acceptable alternative to remote valve control.
(4) Protecting the right-of- (i) Patrol the right-of-way at intervals not exceeding 45 days, but at least
way. 12 times each calendar year, to inspect for excavation activities, ground
movement, wash outs, leakage, or other activities or conditions affecting
(e) Is there any change in overpressure pressure that exceeds the lowest of the fol-
protection associated with operating at the lowing pressures, as applicable:
alternative maximum allowable operating (1) The design pressure of the weakest
pressure? Notwithstanding the required ca- element in the segment, determined in ac-
pacity of pressure relieving and limiting sta- cordance with Subparts C and D of this
tions otherwise required by 192.201, if an part.
operator establishes a maximum allowable (2) 60 p.s.i. (414 kPa) gage, for a seg-
operating pressure for a pipeline segment in ment of a distribution system otherwise des-
accordance with paragraph (a) of this sec- ignated to operate at over 60 p.s.i. (414 kPa)
tion, an operator must: gage, unless the service lines in the segment
(1) Provide overpressure protection that are equipped with service regulators or oth-
limits mainline pressure to a maximum of er pressure limiting devices in series that
104 percent of the maximum allowable op- meet the requirements of 192.197(c).
erating pressure; and (3) 25 p.s.i. (172 kPa) gage in segments
(2) Develop and follow a procedure for of cast iron pipe in which there are unrein-
establishing and maintaining accurate set forced bell and spigot joints.
points for the supervisory control and data (4) The pressure limits to which a joint
acquisition system. could be subjected without the possibility of
its parting.
Amdt. 192-[107], 73 FR 62147, October 17, (5) The pressure determined by the op-
2008; Amdt. 192-111, 74 FR 62503, Nov. erator to be the maximum safe pressure af-
30, 2009] ter considering the history of the segment,
particularly known corrosion and the actual
operating pressures.
192.621 Maximum allowable operating (b) No person may operate a segment of
pressure: High-pressure distribution sys- pipeline to which paragraph (a)(5) of this
tems. section applies, unless overpressure protec-
(a) No person may operate a segment of tive devices are installed on the segment in
a high pressure distribution system at a a manner that will prevent the maximum
allowable operating pressure from being (2) The line transports gas to any of the
exceeded, in accordance with 192.195. following facilities which received gas
without an odorant from that line before
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970 as amended May 5, 1975:
by Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13, (i) An underground storage field;
1998] (ii) A gas processing plant;
(iii) A gas dehydration plant; or
(iv) An industrial plant using gas in a
192.623 Maximum and minimum process where the presence of an odorant:
allowable operating pressure:; (A) Makes the end product unfit for the
Low-pressure distribution systems. purpose for which it is intended;
(B) Reduces the activity of a catalyst; or
(a) No person may operate a low- (C) Reduces the percentage completion
pressure distribution system at a pressure of a chemical reaction;
high enough to make unsafe the operation (3) In the case of a lateral line which
of any connected and properly adjusted transports gas to a distribution center, at
low-pressure gas burning equipment. least 50 percent of the length of that line is
(b) No person may operate a low pres- in a Class 1 or Class 2 location; or,
sure distribution system at a pressure lower (4) The combustible gas is hydrogen
than the minimum pressure at which the intended for use as a feedstock in a manu-
safe and continuing operation of any con- facturing process.
nected and properly adjusted low-pressure (c) In the concentrations in which it is
gas burning equipment can be assured. used, the odorant in combustible gases must
comply with the following:
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970 as amended (1) The odorant may not be deleterious
by Amdt. 192-75, 61 FR 18512, Apr. 26, to persons, materials, or pipe.
1996] (2) The products of combustion from
the odorant may not be toxic when breathed
nor may they be corrosive or harmful to
192.625 Odorization of gas. those materials to which the products of
combustion will be exposed.
(a) A combustible gas in a distribution (d) The odorant may not be soluble in
line must contain a natural odorant or be water to an extent greater than 2.5 parts to
odorized so that at a concentration in air of 100 parts by weight.
one-fifth of the lower explosive limit, the (e) Equipment for odorization must in-
gas is readily detectable by a person with a troduce the odorant without wide variations
normal sense of smell. in the level of odorant.
(b) After December 31, 1976, a com- (f) To assure the proper concentration of
bustible gas in a transmission line in a Class odorant in accordance with this section,
3 or Class 4 location must comply with the each operator must conduct periodic sam-
requirements of paragraph (a) of this section pling of combustible gases using an instru-
unless: ment capable of determining the percentage
(1) At least 50 percent of the length of of gas in air at which the odor becomes rea-
the line downstream from that location is in dily detectable. Operators of master meter
a Class 1 or Class 2 location; systems may comply with this requirement
by
(1) Receiving written verification from supplied in sufficient quantity to prevent the
their gas source that the gas has the proper formation of a hazardous mixture of gas and
concentration of odorant; and air, a slug of inert gas must be released into
(2) Conducting periodic "sniff" tests at the line before the air.
the extremities of the system to confirm that
the gas contains odorant. [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970]
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970 as amended Editorial Note: All of 192.631 is new ma-
by Amdt. 192-2, 35 FR 17335, Nov. 11, terial and therefore not underlined.
1970; Amdt. 192-6, 36 FR 25423, Dec. 31,
1971; Amdt. 192-7, 37 FR 17970, Sept. 2,
1972; Amdt. 192-14, 38 FR 14943, June 7, 192.631 Control room management.
1973; Amdt. 192-15, 38 FR 35471, Dec. 28,
1973; Amdt. 192-16, 39 FR 45253, Dec. 31, (a) General.
1974; Amdt. 192-21, 40 FR 20279, May 9, (1) This section applies to each operator
1975; Amdt. 192-58, 53 FR 1633, Jan. 21, of a pipeline facility with a controller work-
1988; Amdt. 192-76, 61 FR 26121, May 24, ing in a control room who monitors and con-
1996; Amdt. 192-78, 61 FR 28770, June 6, trols all or part of a pipeline facility through
1996; Amdt. 192-93, 68 FR 53895, Sept. a SCADA system. Each operator must have
15, 2003] and follow written control room manage-
ment procedures that implement the re-
quirements of this section, except that for
192.627 Tapping pipelines under pres- each control room where an operator's activ-
sure. ities are limited to either or both of:
(i) Distribution with less than 250,000
Each tap made on a pipeline under pres- services, or
sure must be performed by a crew qualified (ii) Transmission without a compressor
to make hot taps. station, the operator must have and follow
written procedures that implement only pa-
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970] ragraphs (d) (regarding fatigue), (i) (regard-
ing compliance validation), and (j) (regard-
ing compliance and deviations) of this sec-
192.629 Purging of pipelines. tion.
(2) The procedures required by this sec-
(a) When a pipeline is being purged of tion must be integrated, as appropriate, with
air by use of gas, the gas must be released operating and emergency procedures re-
into one end of the line in a moderately rap- quired by Sec. 192.605 and 192.615. An
id and continuous flow. If gas cannot be operator must develop the procedures no
supplied in sufficient quantity to prevent the later than August 1, 2011 and implement the
formation of a hazardous mixture of gas and procedures no later than Febraury 1, 20132.
air, a slug of inert gas must be released into (b) Roles and responsibilities. Each op-
the line before the gas. erator must define the roles and responsibili-
(b) When a pipeline is being purged of ties of a controller during normal, abnormal,
gas by use of air, the air must be released and emergency operating conditions. To
into one end of the line in a moderately rap- provide for a controller's prompt and appro-
id and continuous flow. If air cannot be priate response to operating conditions, an
operator must define each of the following:
(1) A controller's authority and responsi- (5) Establish and implement procedures
bility to make decisions and take actions for when a different controller assumes re-
during normal operations; sponsibility, including the content of infor-
(2) A controller's role when an abnormal mation to be exchanged.
operating condition is detected, even if the (d) Fatigue mitigation. Each operator
controller is not the first to detect the condi- must implement the following methods to
tion, including the controller's responsibility reduce the risk associated with controller
to take specific actions and to communicate fatigue that could inhibit a controller's abili-
with others; ty to carry out the roles and responsibilities
(3) A controller's role during an emer- the operator has defined:
gency, even if the controller is not the first (1) Establish shift lengths and schedule
to detect the emergency, including the con- rotations that provide controllers off-duty
troller's responsibility to take specific ac- time sufficient to achieve eight hours of con-
tions and to communicate with others; and tinuous sleep;
(4) A method of recording controller (2) Educate controllers and supervisors
shift-changes and any hand- in fatigue mitigation strategies and how off-
over of responsibility between controllers. duty activities contribute to fatigue;
(c) Provide adequate information. Each (3) Train controllers and supervisors to
operator must provide its controllers with recognize the effects of fatigue; and
the information, tools, processes and proce- (4) Establish a maximum limit on con-
dures necessary for the controllers to carry troller hours-of-service, which may provide
out the roles and responsibilities the operator for an emergency deviation from the maxi-
has defined by performing each of the fol- mum limit if necessary for the safe operation
lowing: of a pipeline facility.
(1) Implement sections 1, 4, 8, 9, 11.1, (e) Alarm management. Each operator
and 11.3 of API RP 1165 (incorporated by using a SCADA system must have a written
reference, see 192.7) whenever a SCADA alarm management plan to provide for effec-
system is added, expanded or replaced, un- tive controller response to alarms. An opera-
less the operator demonstrates that certain tor's plan must include provisions to:
provisions of sections 1, 4, 8, 9, 11.1, and (1) Review SCADA safety-related alarm
11.3 of API RP 1165 are not practical for the operations using a process that ensures
SCADA system used; alarms are accurate and support safe pipeline
(2) Conduct a point-to-point verification operations;
between SCADA displays and related field (2) Identify at least once each calendar
equipment when field equipment is added or month points affecting safety that have been
moved and when other changes that affect taken off scan in the SCADA host, have had
pipeline safety are made to field equipment alarms inhibited, generated false alarms, or
or SCADA displays; that have had forced or manual values for
(3) Test and verify an internal communi- periods of time exceeding that required for
cation plan to provide adequate means for associated maintenance or operating activi-
manual operation of the pipeline safely, at ties;
least once each calendar year, but at inter- (3) Verify the correct safety-related
vals not to exceed 15 months; alarm set-point values and alarm descrip-
(4) Test any backup SCADA systems at tions at least once each calendar year, but at
least once each calendar year, but at inter- intervals not to exceed 15 months;
vals not to exceed 15 months; and
192.707 Line markers for mains and (2) The name of the operator and tele-
transmission lines. phone number (including area code) where
the operator can be reached at all times.
(a) Buried pipelines. Except as pro-
vided in paragraph (b) of this section, a line [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended
marker must be placed and maintained as by Amdt. 192-20, 40 FR 13505, Mar. 27,
close as practical over each buried main and 1975; Amdt. 192-20A, 41 FR 56808, Dec.
transmission line: 30, 1976; Amdt. 192-27, 41 FR 39752,
(1) At each crossing of a public road Aug. 16, 1976; Amdt. 192-40, 47 FR
and railroad; and 13818, Apr. 1, 1982; Amdt. 192-44, 48 FR
(2) Wherever necessary to identify the 25206, June 6, 1983; Amdt. 192-73, 60 FR
location of the transmission line or main to 14646, Mar. 20, 1995; Amdt. 192-85, 63
reduce the possibility of damage or interfe- FR 37500, July 13, 1998]
rence.
(b) Exceptions for buried pipelines. Line
markers are not required for the following 192.709 Transmission lines: Record-
pipelines: keeping.
(1) Mains and transmission lines located
offshore, or at crossings of or under water- Each operator shall maintain the follow-
ways and other bodies of water. ing records for transmission lines for the
(2) Mains in Class 3 or Class 4 locations periods specified:
where a damage prevention program is in (a) The date, location, and description of
effect under 192.614. each repair made to pipe (including pipe-to-
(3) Transmission lines in Class 3 or 4 pipe connections) must be retained for as
locations until March 20, 1996. long as the pipe remains in service.
(4) Transmission lines in Class 3 or 4 (b) The date, location, and description
locations where placement of a line marker of each repair made to parts of the pipeline
is impractical. system other than pipe must be retained for
(c) Pipelines above ground. Line mark- at least 5 years. However, repairs generated
ers must be placed and maintained along by patrols, surveys, inspections, or tests re-
each section of a main and transmission line quired by subparts L and M of this part
that is located above ground in an area ac- must be retained in accordance with para-
cessible to the public. graph (c) of this section.
(d) Marker warning. The following (c) A record of each patrol, survey, in-
must be written legibly on a background of spection, and test required by subparts L
sharply contrasting color on each line mark- and M of this part must be retained for at
er: least 5 years or until the next patrol, survey,
(1) The word "Warning," "Caution," or inspection, or test is completed, whichever
"Danger" followed by the words "Gas (or is longer.
name of gas transported) Pipeline" all of
which, except for markers in heavily devel- [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970 as amended
oped urban areas, must be in letters at least by Amdt. 192-78, 61 FR 28770, June 6,
1 inch (25 millimeters) high with inch 1996]
(6.4 millimeters) stroke.
192.717 Transmission lines: Perma- cutting out the damaged portion of the pipe
nent field repair of leaks. as a cylinder, the replacement pipe must be
tested to the pressure required for a new line
Each permanent field repair of a leak on installed in the same location. This test
a transmission line must be made by-- may be made on the pipe before it is in-
(a) Removing the leak by cutting out stalled.
and replacing a cylindrical piece of pipe; or (b) Testing of repairs made by welding.
(b) Repairing the leak by one of the fol- Each repair made by welding in accordance
lowing methods: with 192.713, 192.715, and 192.717
(1) Install a full encirclement welded must be examined in accordance with
split sleeve of appropriate design, unless the 192.241.
transmission line is joined by mechanical
couplings and operates at less than 40 per- [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended
cent of SMYS. by Amdt. 192-54, 51 FR 41634, Nov. 18,
(2) If the leak is due to a corrosion pit, 1986]
install a properly designed bolt-on-leak
clamp.
(3) If the leak is due to a corrosion pit 192.721 Distribution systems: Patrol-
and on pipe of not more than 40,000 psi ling.
(267 Mpa) SMYS, fillet weld over the pit-
ted area a steel plate patch with rounded (a) The frequency of patrolling mains
corners, of the same or greater thickness must be determined by the severity of the
than the pipe, and not more than one-half of conditions which could cause failure or lea-
the diameter of the pipe in size. kage, and the consequent hazards to public
(4) If the leak is on a submerged off- safety.
shore pipeline or submerged pipeline in in- (b) Mains in places or on structures
land navigable waters, mechanically apply a where anticipated physical movement or
full encirclement split sleeve of appropriate external loading could cause failure or lea-
design. kage must be patrolled
(5) Apply a method that reliable engi- (1) In business districts, at intervals not
neering tests and analyses show can perma- exceeding 4 months, but at least four
nently restore the serviceability of the pipe. times each calendar year; and
(2) Outside business districts, at inter-
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended vals not exceeding 7 months, but at least
by Amdt. 192-11, 37 FR 21816, Oct. 14, twice each calendar year.
1972; Amdt. 192-27, 41 FR 34598, Aug.
16, 1976; Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended
13, 1998; Amdt. 192-88, 64 FR 69660, Dec. by Amdt. 192-43, 47 FR 46850, Oct. 21,
14, 1999] 1982; Amdt. 192-78, 61 FR 28770, June 6,
1996]
(a) Each operator of a distribution sys- (a) Except as provided in paragraph (b)
tem shall conduct periodic leakage surveys of this section, each disconnected service
in accordance with this section. line must be tested in the same manner as a
(b) The type and scope of the leakage new service line, before being reinstated.
control program must be determined by the (b) Each service line temporarily dis-
nature of the operations and the local condi- connected from the main must be tested
tions, but it must meet the following mini- from the point of disconnection to the ser-
mum requirements: vice line valve in the same manner as a new
(1) A leakage survey with leak detector service line, before reconnecting. However,
equipment must be conducted in business if provisions are made to maintain conti-
districts, including tests of the atmosphere nuous service, such as by installation of a
in gas, electric, telephone, sewer, and water bypass, any part of the original service line
system manholes, at cracks in pavement and used to maintain continuous service need
sidewalks, and at other locations providing not be tested.
an opportunity for finding gas leaks, at in-
tervals not exceeding 15 months, but at least [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970]
once each calendar year.
(2) A leakage survey with leak detector
equipment must be conducted outside busi- 192.727 Abandonment or deactivation
ness districts as frequently as necessary, but of facilities.
at least once every 5 calendar years at inter-
vals not exceeding 63 months. However, for (a) Each operator shall conduct aban-
cathodically unprotected distribution lines donment or deactivation of pipelines in ac-
subject to 192.465(e) on which electrical cordance with the requirements of this sec-
surveys for corrosion are impractical, a lea- tion.
kage survey must be conducted at least once (b) Each pipeline abandoned in place
every 3 calendar years at intervals not ex- must be disconnected from all sources and
ceeding 39 months. supplies of gas; purged of gas; in the case of
offshore pipelines, filled with water or inert
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended materials; and sealed at the ends. However,
by Amdt. 192-43, 47 FR 46850, Oct. 21, the pipeline need not be purged when the
1982; Amdt. 192-70, 58 FR 54524, Oct. 22, volume of gas is so small that there is no
1993; Amdt. 192-71, 59 FR 6575, Feb. 11, potential hazard.
1994; Amdt. 192-94, 69 FR 32886, June 14, (c) Except for service lines, each inac-
2004; Amdt. 192-94A, 69 FR 54591, Sept. tive pipeline that is not being maintained
9, 2004] under this part must be disconnected from
all sources and supplies of gas; purged of
gas; in the case of offshore pipelines, filled
with water or inert materials; and sealed at
the ends. However, the pipeline need not be
purged when the volume of gas is so small
that there is no potential hazard.
(a) Except for rupture discs, each pres- (a) Not later than September 16, 1996,
sure relieving device in a compressor sta- each compressor building in a compressor
tion must be inspected and tested in accor- station must have a fixed gas detection and
dance with 192.739 and 192.743, and alarm system, unless the building is
must be operated periodically to determine (1) Constructed so that at least 50 per-
that it opens at the correct set pressure. cent of its upright side area is permanently
(b) Any defective or inadequate equip- open; or
ment found must be promptly repaired or (2) Located in an unattended field com-
replaced. pressor station of 1,000 horsepower (746
(c) Each remote control shutdown de- kilowatts) or less.
vice must be inspected and tested at inter- (b) Except when shutdown of the sys-
vals not exceeding 15 months, but at least tem is necessary for maintenance under pa-
once each calendar year, to determine that it ragraph (c) of this section, each gas detec-
functions properly. tion and alarm system required by this sec-
tion must
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended (1) Continuously monitor the compres-
by Amdt. 192-43, 47 FR 46850, Oct. 21, sor building for a concentration of gas in air
1982] of not more than 25 percent of the lower
explosive limit; and
(2) If that concentration of gas is de-
192.733 [Removed] tected, warn persons about to enter the
building and persons inside the building of
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended the danger.
by Amdt. 192-71, 59 FR 6575, Feb. 11, (c) Each gas detection and alarm system
1994] required by this section must be maintained
to function properly. The maintenance
must include performance tests.
192.735 Compressor stations:
Storage of combustible materials. [Amdt. 192-69, 58 FR 48460, Sept. 16,
1993 as amended by Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR
(a) Flammable or combustible materials 37500, July 13, 1998]
in quantities beyond those required for eve-
ryday use, or other than those normally used
in compressor buildings, must be stored a 192.737 [Removed]
safe distance from the compressor building.
(b) Above ground oil or gasoline storage [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended
tanks must be protected in accordance with by Amdt. 192-71, 59 FR 6575, Feb. 11,
National Fire Protection Association Stan- 1994]
dard No. 30.
192.739 Pressure limiting and regulat- 192.741 Pressure limiting and regulat-
ing stations: Inspection and testing. ing stations: Telemetering or recording
gauges.
(a) Each pressure limiting station, relief
device (except rupture discs), and pressure (a) Each distribution system supplied by
regulating station and its equipment must be more than one district pressure regulating
subjected at intervals not exceeding 15 station must be equipped with telemetering
months, but at least once each calendar or recording pressure gauges to indicate the
year, to inspections and tests to determine gas pressure in the district.
that it is (b) On distribution systems supplied by
(1) In good mechanical condition; a single district pressure regulating station,
(2) Adequate from the standpoint of ca- the operator shall determine the necessity of
pacity and reliability of operation for the installing telemetering or recording gauges
service in which it is employed; in the district, taking into consideration the
(3) Except as provided in paragraph (b) number of customers supplied, the operat-
of this section, set to control or relieve at ing pressures, the capacity of the installa-
the correct pressure consistent with the tion, and other operating conditions.
pressure limits of 192.201(a); and (c) If there are indications of abnormally
(4) Properly installed and protected high- or low-pressure, the regulator and the
from dirt, liquids, or other conditions that auxiliary equipment must be inspected and
might prevent proper operation. the necessary measures employed to correct
(b) For steel pipelines whose MAOP is any unsatisfactory operating conditions.
determined under 192.619(c), if the
MAOP is 60 psi (414 kPa) gage or more, [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970]
the control or relief pressure limit is as fol-
lows:
192.743 Pressure limiting and regulat-
If the MAOP produces Then the pressure limit is: ing stations: Capacity of relief devices.
a hoop stress that is:
Greater than 72 per- MAOP plus 4 percent.
cent of SMYS (a) Pressure relief devices at pressure
Unknown as a percen- A pressure that will pre- limiting stations and pressure regulating sta-
tage of SMYS vent unsafe operation of tions must have sufficient capacity to protect
the pipeline considering the facilities to which they are connected.
its operating and mainten- Except as provided in 192.739(b), the ca-
ance history and MAOP.
pacity must be consistent with the pressure
limits of 192.201(a). This capacity must be
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended
determined at intervals not exceeding 15
by Amdt. 192-43, 47 FR 46850, Oct. 21,
months, but at least once each calendar year,
1982; Amdt. 192-93, 68 FR 53895, Sept.
by testing the devices in place or by review
15, 2003; Amdt. 192-96, 69 FR 27861, May
and calculations.
17, 2004]
(b) If review and calculations are used to
determine if a device has sufficient capacity,
the calculated capacity must be compared
with the rated or experimentally determined
relieving capacity of the device for the con-
ditions under which it operates. After the
initial calculations, subsequent calculations (b) Each operator must take prompt re-
need not be made if the annual review doc- medial action to correct any valve found
uments that parameters have not changed to inoperable, unless the operator designates
cause the rated or experimentally deter- an alternative valve.
mined relieving capacity to be insufficient.
(c) If a relief device is of insufficient ca- [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended
pacity, a new or additional device must be by Amdt. 192-43, 47 FR 46850, Oct. 21,
installed to provide the capacity required by 1982; Amdt. 192-93, 68 FR 53895, Sept.
paragraph (a) of this section. 15, 2003]
the tasks in a manner that ensures the safe program is under the authority of that state
operation of pipeline facilities; and agency.
(i) After December 16, 2004, notify the (b) Operators must complete the qualifi-
Administrator or a state agency participat- cation of individuals performing covered
ing under 49 U.S.C. Chapter 601 if the op- tasks by October 28, 2002.
erator significantly modifies the program (c) Work performance history review
after the Administrator or state agency has may be used as a sole evaluation method for
verified that it complies with this section. individuals who were performing a covered
task prior to October 26, 1999.
[Amdt. 192-86, 64 FR 46853, Aug. 27, (d) After October 28, 2002, work per-
1999 as amended by Amdt. 192-100, 70 FR formance history may not be used as a sole
10322, Mar. 3, 2005] evaluation method.
(e) After December 16, 2004, observa-
tion of on-the-job performance may not be
192.807 Recordkeeping. used as the sole method of evaluation.
Each operator shall maintain records [Amdt. 192-86, 64 FR 46853, Aug. 27,
that demonstrate compliance with this sub- 1999 as amended by Amdt. 192-86A, 66 FR
part. 43523, Aug. 20, 2001; Amdt. 192-100, 70
(a) Qualification records shall include: FR 10322, Mar. 3, 2005]
(1) Identification of qualified individu-
al(s);
(2) Identification of the covered tasks
the individual is qualified to perform;
(3) Date(s) of current qualification; and
(4) Qualification method(s).
(b) Records supporting an individual's
current qualification shall be maintained
while the individual is performing the cov-
ered task. Records of prior qualification and
records of individuals no longer performing
covered tasks shall be retained for a period
of five years.
192.809 General.
Subpart OGas Transmission Pipeline evaluate certain threats (i.e., external corro-
Integrity Management sion, internal corrosion and stress corrosion
cracking) to a covered pipeline segment's
integrity. The process includes the gathering
192.901 What do the regulations in this and integration of risk factor data, indirect
subpart cover? examination or analysis to identify areas of
suspected corrosion, direct examination of
This subpart prescribes minimum re- the pipeline in these areas, and post assess-
quirements for an integrity management ment evaluation.
program on any gas transmission pipeline
covered under this part. For gas transmis- High consequence area means an area
sion pipelines constructed of plastic, only established by one of the methods described
the requirements in 192.917, 192.921, in paragraphs (1) or (2) as follows:
192.935 and 192.937 apply. (1) An area defined as
(i) A Class 3 location under 192.5; or
[Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69777, December (ii) A Class 4 location under 192.5; or
15, 2003 as amended by Amdt. 192 95A, 69 (iii) Any area in a Class 1 or Class 2 lo-
FR 2307, December 22, 2003] cation where the potential impact radius is
greater than 660 feet (200 meters), and the
area within a potential impact circle con-
192.903 What definitions apply to this tains 20 or more buildings intended for hu-
subpart? man occupancy; or
(iv) Any area in a Class 1 or Class 2 lo-
The following definitions apply to this cation where the potential impact circle
subpart: contains an identified site.
(2) The area within a potential impact
Assessment is the use of testing tech- circle containing
niques as allowed in this subpart to ascer- (i) 20 or more buildings intended for
tain the condition of a covered pipeline human occupancy, unless the exception in
segment. paragraph (4) applies; or
(ii) An identified site.
Confirmatory direct assessment is an (3) Where a potential impact circle is
integrity assessment method using more calculated under either method (1) or (2) to
focused application of the principles and establish a high consequence area, the
techniques of direct assessment to identify length of the high consequence area extends
internal and external corrosion in a covered axially along the length of the pipeline from
transmission pipeline segment. the outermost edge of the first potential im-
pact circle that contains either an identified
Covered segment or covered pipeline site or 20 or more buildings intended for
segment means a segment of gas transmis- human occupancy to the outermost edge of
sion pipeline located in a high consequence the last contiguous potential impact circle
area. The terms gas and transmission line that contains either an identified site or 20
are defined in 192.3. or more buildings intended for human oc-
cupancy. (See Figure E.I.A. in appendix E.)
Direct assessment is an integrity as- (4) If in identifying a high consequence
sessment method that utilizes a process to area under paragraph (1)(iii) of this defini-
tion or paragraph (2)(i) of this definition, Potential impact circle is a circle of ra-
the radius of the potential impact circle is dius equal to the potential impact radius
greater than 660 feet (200 meters), the oper- (PIR).
ator may identify a high consequence area
based on a prorated number of buildings Potential impact radius (PIR) means
intended for human occupancy within a dis- the radius of a circle within which the po-
tance 660 feet (200 meters) from the center- tential failure of a pipeline could have sig-
line of the pipeline until December 17, nificant impact on people or property. PIR
2006. If an operator chooses this approach, is determined by the formula r = 0.69*
the operator must prorate the number of (square root of (p*d2)), where `r' is the ra-
buildings intended for human occupancy dius of a circular area in feet surrounding
based on the ratio of an area with a radius of the point of failure, `p' is the maximum al-
660 feet (200 meters) to the area of the po- lowable operating pressure (MAOP) in the
tential impact circle (i.e., the prorated num- pipeline segment in pounds per square inch
ber of buildings intended for human occu- and `d' is the nominal diameter of the pipe-
pancy is equal to [20 x (660 feet [or 200 line in inches.
meters ]/potential impact radius in feet [or
meters])2]). Note: 0.69 is the factor for natural gas.
This number will vary for other gases de-
Identified site means each of the follow- pending upon their heat of combustion. An
ing areas: operator transporting gas other than natural
(a) An outside area or open structure gas must use section 3.2 of ASME/ANSI
that is occupied by twenty (20) or more per- B31.8S-2001 (Supplement to ASME B31.8;
sons on at least 50 days in any twelve (12)- incorporated by reference, see 192.7) to
month period. (The days need not be con- calculate the impact radius formula.
secutive.) Examples include but are not li-
mited to, beaches, playgrounds, recreational Remediation is a repair or mitigation
facilities, camping grounds, outdoor thea- activity an operator takes on a covered
ters, stadiums, recreational areas near a segment to limit or reduce the probability of
body of water, or areas outside a rural an undesired event occurring or the ex-
building such as a religious facility); or pected consequences from the event.
(b) A building that is occupied by twen-
ty (20) or more persons on at least five (5) [Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69777, December
days a week for ten (10) weeks in any 15, 2003 as amended by Amdt. 192 95A, 69
twelve (12)-month period. (The days and FR 2307, December 22, 2003; Amdt. 192-
weeks need not be consecutive.) Examples 95B, 69 FR 18227, April 6, 2004; Amdt.
include, but are not limited to, religious fa- 192-95C, 69 FR 29903, May 26, 2004;
cilities, office buildings, community cen- Amdt. 192-103, 71 FR 33402, June 8, 2006;
ters, general stores, 4-H facilities, or roller Amdt. 192-103c, 72 FR 4655, Feb. 1, 2007]
skating rinks); or
(c) A facility occupied by persons who
are confined, are of impaired mobility, or 192.905 How does an operator identify
would be difficult to evacuate. Examples a high consequence area?
include but are not limited to hospitals,
prisons, schools, day-care facilities, retire- (a) General. To determine which seg-
ment facilities or assisted-living facilities. ments of an operator's transmission pipeline
system are covered by this subpart, an oper- (c) Newly identified areas. When an op-
ator must identify the high consequence erator has information that the area around a
areas. An operator must use method (1) or pipeline segment not previously identified
(2) from the definition in 192.903 to iden- as a high consequence area could satisfy
tify a high consequence area. An operator any of the definitions in 192.903, the oper-
may apply one method to its entire pipeline ator must complete the evaluation using me-
system, or an operator may apply one me- thod (1) or (2). If the segment is determined
thod to individual portions of the pipeline to meet the definition as a high consequence
system. An operator must describe in its area, it must be incorporated into the opera-
integrity management program which me- tor's baseline assessment plan as a high con-
thod it is applying to each portion of the sequence area within one year from the date
operator's pipeline system. The description the area is identified.
must include the potential impact radius
when utilized to establish a high conse- [Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69777, December
quence area. (See appendix E.I. for guid- 15, 2003 as amended by Amdt. 192 95A, 69
ance on identifying high consequence FR 2307, December 22, 2003]
areas.)
(b)(1) Identified sites. An operator must
identify an identified site, for purposes of 192.907 What must an operator do to
this subpart, from information the operator implement this subpart?
has obtained from routine operation and
maintenance activities and from public offi- (a) General. No later than December 17,
cials with safety or emergency response or 2004, an operator of a covered pipeline
planning responsibilities who indicate to the segment must develop and follow a written
operator that they know of locations that integrity management program that contains
meet the identified site criteria. These pub- all the elements described in 192.911 and
lic officials could include officials on a lo- that addresses the risks on each covered
cal emergency planning commission or re- transmission pipeline segment. The initial
levant Native American tribal officials. integrity management program must con-
(2) If a public official with safety or sist, at a minimum, of a framework that de-
emergency response or planning responsi- scribes the process for implementing each
bilities informs an operator that it does not program element, how relevant decisions
have the information to identify an identi- will be made and by whom, a time line for
fied site, the operator must use one of the completing the work to implement the pro-
following sources, as appropriate, to identi- gram element, and how information gained
fy these sites. from experience will be continuously incor-
(i) Visible marking (e.g., a sign); or porated into the program. The framework
(ii) The site is licensed or registered by will evolve into a more detailed and com-
a Federal, State, or local government agen- prehensive program. An operator must
cy; or make continual improvements to the pro-
(iii) The site is on a list (including a list gram.
on an internet web site) or map maintained (b) Implementation Standards. In carry-
by or available from a Federal, State, or lo- ing out this subpart, an operator must fol-
cal government agency and available to the low the requirements of this subpart and of
general public. ASME/ANSI B31.8S (incorporated by ref-
erence, see 192.7) and its appendices,
where specified. An operator may follow an 192.911 What are the elements of an
equivalent standard or practice only when integrity management program?
the operator demonstrates the alternative
standard or practice provides an equivalent An operator's initial integrity manage-
level of safety to the public and property. In ment program begins with a framework (see
the event of a conflict between this subpart 192.907) and evolves into a more detailed
and ASME/ANSI B31.8S, the requirements and comprehensive integrity management
in this subpart control. program, as information is gained and in-
corporated into the program. An operator
[Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69777, December must make continual improvements to its
15, 2003 as amended by Amdt. 192 95A, 69 program. The initial program framework
FR 2307, December 22, 2003; Amdt. 192- and subsequent program must, at minimum,
103, 71 FR 33402, June 8, 2006] contain the following elements. (When in-
dicated, refer to ASME/ANSI B31.8S (in-
corporated by reference, see 192.7) for
192.909 How can an operator change more detailed information on the listed ele-
its integrity management program? ment.)
(a) An identification of all high conse-
(a) General. An operator must docu- quence areas, in accordance with 192.905.
ment any change to its program and the rea- (b) A baseline assessment plan meeting
sons for the change before implementing the requirements of 192.919 and 192.921.
the change. (c) An identification of threats to each
(b) Notification. An operator must noti- covered pipeline segment, which must in-
fy OPS, in accordance with 192.949, of clude data integration and a risk assessment.
any change to the program that may sub- An operator must use the threat identifica-
stantially affect the program's implementa- tion and risk assessment to prioritize cov-
tion or may significantly modify the pro- ered segments for assessment (192.917)
gram or schedule for carrying out the pro- and to evaluate the merits of additional pre-
gram elements. An operator must also noti- ventive and mitigative measures (192.935)
fy a State or local pipeline safety authority for each covered segment.
when either a covered segment is located in (d) A direct assessment plan, if applica-
a State where OPS has an interstate agent ble, meeting the requirements of 192.923,
agreement, or an intrastate covered segment and depending on the threat assessed, of
is regulated by that State. An operator must 192.925, 192.927, or 192.929.
provide the notification within 30 days after (e) Provisions meeting the requirements
adopting this type of change into its pro- of 192.933 for remediating conditions
gram. found during an integrity assessment.
(f) A process for continual evaluation
[Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69777, December and assessment meeting the requirements of
15, 2003 as amended by Amdt. 192 95A, 69 192.937.
FR 2307, December 22, 2003; Amdt. 192- (g) If applicable, a plan for confirmatory
95B, 69 FR 18227, April 6, 2004] direct assessment meeting the requirements
of 192.931.
(h) Provisions meeting the requirements
of 192.935 for adding preventive and mi-
tigative measures to protect the high conse- 192.913 When may an operator deviate
quence area. its program from certain requirements of
(i) A performance plan as outlined in this subpart?
ASME/ANSI B31.8S, section 9 that in-
cludes performance measures meeting the (a) General. ASME/ANSI B31.8S (in-
requirements of 192.945. corporated by reference, see 192.7) pro-
(j) Record keeping provisions meeting vides the essential features of a perfor-
the requirements of 192.947. mance-based or a prescriptive integrity
(k) A management of change process as management program. An operator that uses
outlined in ASME/ANSI B31.8S, section a performance-based approach that satisfies
11. the requirements for exceptional perfor-
(l) A quality assurance process as out- mance in paragraph (b) of this section may
lined in ASME/ANSI B31.8S, section 12. deviate from certain requirements in this
(m) A communication plan that includes subpart, as provided in paragraph (c) of this
the elements of ASME/ANSI B31.8S, sec- section.
tion 10, and that includes procedures for (b) Exceptional performance. An opera-
addressing safety concerns raised by tor must be able to demonstrate the excep-
(1) OPS; and tional performance of its integrity manage-
(2) A State or local pipeline safety au- ment program through the following ac-
thority when a covered segment is located tions.
in a State where OPS has an interstate agent (1) To deviate from any of the require-
agreement. ments set forth in paragraph (c) of this sec-
(n) Procedures for providing (when re- tion, an operator must have a performance-
quested), by electronic or other means, a based integrity management program that
copy of the operator's risk analysis or inte- meets or exceed the performance-based re-
grity management program to quirements of ASME/ANSI B31.8S and
(1) OPS; and includes, at a minimum, the following ele-
(2) A State or local pipeline safety au- ments
thority when a covered segment is located (i) A comprehensive process for risk
in a State where OPS has an interstate agent analysis;
agreement. (ii) All risk factor data used to support
(o) Procedures for ensuring that each the program;
integrity assessment is being conducted in a (iii) A comprehensive data integration
manner that minimizes environmental and process;
safety risks. (iv) A procedure for applying lessons
(p) A process for identification and as- learned from assessment of covered pipe-
sessment of newly-identified high conse- line segments to pipeline segments not cov-
quence areas. (See 192.905 and 192.921.) ered by this subpart;
(v) A procedure for evaluating every
[Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69777, December incident, including its cause, within the op-
15, 2003 as amended by Amdt. 192 95A, 69 erator's sector of the pipeline industry for
FR 2307, December 22, 2003; Amdt. 192- implications both to the operator's pipeline
95B, 69 FR 18227, April 6, 2004; Amdt. system and to the operator's integrity man-
192-103, 71 FR 33402, June 8, 2006] agement program;
(vi) A performance matrix that demon-
strates the program has been effective in
ensuring the integrity of the covered seg- monstrates the time frame will not jeopard-
ments by controlling the identified threats to ize the safety of the covered segment.
the covered segments;
(vii) Semi-annual performance meas- [Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69777, December
ures beyond those required in 192.945 that 15, 2003 as amended by Amdt. 192 95A, 69
are part of the operator's performance plan. FR 2307, December 22, 2003; Amdt. 192-
(See 192.911(i).) An operator must submit 95B, 69 FR 18227, April 6, 2004; Amdt.
these measures, by electronic or other 192-103, 71 FR 33402, June 8, 2006]
means, on a semi-annual frequency to OPS
in accordance with 192.951; and
(viii) An analysis that supports the de- 192.915 What knowledge and training
sired integrity reassessment interval and the must personnel have to carry out an inte-
remediation methods to be used for all cov- grity management program?
ered segments.
(2) In addition to the requirements for (a) Supervisory personnel. The integrity
the performance-based plan, an operator management program must provide that
must each supervisor whose responsibilities re-
(i) Have completed at least two integrity late to the integrity management program
assessments on each covered pipeline seg- possesses and maintains a thorough know-
ment the operator is including under the ledge of the integrity management program
performance-based approach, and be able to and of the elements for which the supervi-
demonstrate that each assessment effective- sor is responsible. The program must pro-
ly addressed the identified threats on the vide that any person who qualifies as a su-
covered segment. pervisor for the integrity management pro-
(ii) Remediate all anomalies identified gram has appropriate training or experience
in the more recent assessment according to in the area for which the person is responsi-
the requirements in 192.933, and incorpo- ble.
rate the results and lessons learned from the (b) Persons who carry out assessments
more recent assessment into the operator's and evaluate assessment results. The integr-
data integration and risk assessment. ity management program must provide cri-
(c) Deviation. Once an operator has teria for the qualification of any person
demonstrated that it has satisfied the re- (1) Who conducts an integrity assess-
quirements of paragraph (b) of this section, ment allowed under this subpart; or
the operator may deviate from the prescrip- (2) Who reviews and analyzes the re-
tive requirements of ASME/ANSI B31.8S sults from an integrity assessment and eval-
and of this subpart only in the following uation; or
instances. (3) Who makes decisions on actions to
(1) The time frame for reassessment as be taken based on these assessments.
provided in 192.939 except that reassess- (c) Persons responsible for preventive
ment by some method allowed under this and mitigative measures. The integrity
subpart (e.g., confirmatory direct assess- management program must provide criteria
ment) must be carried out at intervals no for the qualification of any person
longer than seven years; (1) Who implements preventive and mi-
(2) The time frame for remediation as tigative measures to carry out this subpart,
provided in 192.933 if the operator de- including the marking and locating of bu-
ried structures; or
(2) Who directly supervises excavation corrosion control records, continuing sur-
work carried out in conjunction with an in- veillance records, patrolling records, main-
tegrity assessment. tenance history, internal inspection records
and all other conditions specific to each
[Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69777, December pipeline.
15, 2003 as amended by Amdt. 192 95A, 69 (c) Risk assessment. An operator must
FR 2307, December 22, 2003] conduct a risk assessment that follows
ASME/ANSI B31.8S, section 5, and con-
siders the identified threats for each covered
192.917 How does an operator identify segment. An operator must use the risk as-
potential threats to pipeline integrity and sessment to prioritize the covered segments
use the threat identification in its integri- for the baseline and continual reassessments
ty program? ( 192.919, 192.921, 192.937), and to de-
termine what additional preventive and mi-
(a) Threat identification. An operator tigative measures are needed (192.935) for
must identify and evaluate all potential the covered segment.
threats to each covered pipeline segment. (d) Plastic transmission pipeline. An
Potential threats that an operator must con- operator of a plastic transmission pipeline
sider include, but are not limited to, the must assess the threats to each covered
threats listed in ASME/ANSI B31.8S (in- segment using the information in sections 4
corporated by reference, see 192.7), sec- and 5 of ASME B31.8S, and consider any
tion 2, which are grouped under the follow- threats unique to the integrity of plastic
ing four categories: pipe.
(1) Time dependent threats such as in- (e) Actions to address particular
ternal corrosion, external corrosion, and threats. If an operator identifies any of the
stress corrosion cracking; following threats, the operator must take the
(2) Static or resident threats, such as fa- following actions to address the threat.
brication or construction defects; (1) Third party damage. An operator
(3) Time independent threats such as must utilize the data integration required in
third party damage and outside force dam- paragraph (b) of this section and
age; and ASME/ANSI B31.8S, Appendix A7 to de-
(4) Human error. termine the susceptibility of each covered
(b) Data gathering and integration. To segment to the threat of third party damage.
identify and evaluate the potential threats to If an operator identifies the threat of third
a covered pipeline segment, an operator party damage, the operator must implement
must gather and integrate existing data and comprehensive additional preventive meas-
information on the entire pipeline that could ures in accordance with 192.935 and
be relevant to the covered segment. In per- monitor the effectiveness of the preventive
forming this data gathering and integration, measures. If, in conducting a baseline as-
an operator must follow the requirements in sessment under 192.921, or a reassessment
ASME/ANSI B31.8S, section 4. At a mini- under 192.937, an operator uses an internal
mum, an operator must gather and evaluate inspection tool or external corrosion direct
the set of data specified in Appendix A to assessment, the operator must integrate data
ASME/ANSI B31.8S, and consider both on from these assessments with data related to
the covered segment and similar non- any encroachment or foreign line crossing
covered segments, past incident history, on the covered segment, to define where
potential indications of third party damage (iii) The stresses leading to cyclic fati-
may exist in the covered segment. gue increase.
An operator must also have procedures (4) ERW pipe. If a covered pipeline
in its integrity management program ad- segment contains low frequency electric
dressing actions it will take to respond to resistance welded pipe (ERW), lap welded
findings from this data integration. pipe or other pipe that satisfies the condi-
(2) Cyclic fatigue. An operator must tions specified in ASME/ANSI B31.8S,
evaluate whether cyclic fatigue or other Appendices A4.3 and A4.4, and any cov-
loading condition (including ground move- ered or noncovered segment in the pipeline
ment, suspension bridge condition) could system with such pipe has experienced
lead to a failure of a deformation, including seam failure, or operating pressure on the
a dent or gouge, or other defect in the cov- covered segment has increased over the
ered segment. An evaluation must assume maximum operating pressure experienced
the presence of threats in the covered seg- during the preceding five years, an operator
ment that could be exacerbated by cyclic must select an assessment technology or
fatigue. An operator must use the results technologies with a proven application ca-
from the evaluation together with the crite- pable of assessing seam integrity and seam
ria used to evaluate the significance of this corrosion anomalies. The operator must pri-
threat to the covered segment to prioritize oritize the covered segment as a high risk
the integrity baseline assessment or reas- segment for the baseline assessment or a
sessment. subsequent reassessment.
(3) Manufacturing and construction de- (5) Corrosion. If an operator identifies
fects. If an operator identifies the threat of corrosion on a covered pipeline segment
manufacturing and construction defects (in- that could adversely affect the integrity of
cluding seam defects) in the covered seg- the line (conditions specified in 192.933),
ment, an operator must analyze the covered the operator must evaluate and remediate,
segment to determine the risk of failure as necessary, all pipeline segments (both
from these defects. The analysis must con- covered and non-covered) with similar ma-
sider the results of prior assessments on the terial coating and environmental characte-
covered segment. An operator may consider ristics. An operator must establish a sche-
manufacturing and construction related de- dule for evaluating and remediating, as ne-
fects to be stable defects if the operating cessary, the similar segments that is consis-
pressure on the covered segment has not tent with the operator's established operat-
increased over the maximum operating ing and maintenance procedures under part
pressure experienced during the five years 192 for testing and repair.
preceding identification of the high conse-
quence area. If any of the following changes [Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69777, December
occur in the covered segment, an operator 15, 2003 as amended by Amdt. 192 95A, 69
must prioritize the covered segment as a FR 2307, December 22, 2003; Amdt. 192-
high risk segment for the baseline assess- 95B, 69 FR 18227, April 6, 2004; Amdt.
ment or a subsequent reassessment. 192-103, 71 FR 33402, June 8, 2006]
(i) Operating pressure increases above
the maximum operating pressure expe-
rienced during the preceding five years;
(ii) MAOP increases; or
192.919 What must be in the baseline on the threats to which the covered segment
assessment plan? is susceptible. An operator must select the
method or methods best suited to address
An operator must include each of the the threats identified to the covered segment
following elements in its written baseline (See 192.917).
assessment plan: (1) Internal inspection tool or tools ca-
(a) Identification of the potential threats pable of detecting corrosion, and any other
to each covered pipeline segment and the threats to which the covered segment is sus-
information supporting the threat identifica- ceptible. An operator must follow
tion. (See 192.917.); ASME/ANSI B31.8S (incorporated by ref-
(b) The methods selected to assess the erence, see 192.7), section 6.2 in selecting
integrity of the line pipe, including an ex- the appropriate internal inspection tools for
planation of why the assessment method the covered segment.
was selected to address the identified threats (2) Pressure test conducted in accor-
to each covered segment. The integrity as- dance with subpart J of this part. An opera-
sessment method an operator uses must be tor must use the test pressures specified in
based on the threats identified to the cov- Table 3 of section 5 of ASME/ANSI
ered segment. (See 192.917.) More than B31.8S, to justify an extended reassessment
one method may be required to address all interval in accordance with 192.939.
the threats to the covered pipeline segment; (3) Direct assessment to address threats
(c) A schedule for completing the inte- of external corrosion, internal corrosion,
grity assessment of all covered segments, and stress corrosion cracking. An operator
including risk factors considered in estab- must conduct the direct assessment in ac-
lishing the assessment schedule; cordance with the requirements listed in
(d) If applicable, a direct assessment 192.923 and with, as applicable, the re-
plan that meets the requirements of quirements specified in 192.925,
192.923, and depending on the threat to 192.927 or 192.929;
be addressed, of 192.925, 192.927, or (4) Other technology that an operator
192.929; and demonstrates can provide an equivalent un-
(e) A procedure to ensure that the base- derstanding of the condition of the line pipe.
line assessment is being conducted in a An operator choosing this option must noti-
manner that minimizes environmental and fy the Office of Pipeline Safety (OPS) 180
safety risks. days before conducting the assessment, in
accordance with 192.949. An operator
[Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69777, December must also notify a State or local pipeline
15, 2003 as amended by Amdt. 192 95A, 69 safety authority when either a covered seg-
FR 2307, December 22, 2003] ment is located in a State where OPS has an
interstate agent agreement, or an intrastate
covered segment is regulated by that State.
192.921 How is the baseline assessment (b) Prioritizing segments. An operator
to be conducted? must prioritize the covered pipeline seg-
ments for the baseline assessment according
(a) Assessment methods. An operator to a risk analysis that considers the potential
must assess the integrity of the line pipe in threats to each covered segment. The risk
each covered segment by applying one or analysis must comply with the requirements
more of the following methods depending in 192.917.
(c) Assessment for particular threats. In plastic transmission pipeline indicates that a
choosing an assessment method for the covered segment is susceptible to failure
baseline assessment of each covered seg- from causes other than third-party damage,
ment, an operator must take the actions re- an operator must conduct a baseline as-
quired in 192.917(e) to address particular sessment of the segment in accordance with
threats that it has identified. the requirements of this section and of
(d) Time period. An operator must pri- 192.917. The operator must justify the use
oritize all the covered segments for assess- of an alternative assessment method that
ment in accordance with 192.917 (c) and will address the identified threats to the
paragraph (b) of this section. An operator covered segment.
must assess at least 50% of the covered
segments beginning with the highest risk [Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69777, December
segments, by December 17, 2007. An oper- 15, 2003 as amended by Amdt. 192 95A, 69
ator must complete the baseline assessment FR 2307, December 22, 2003; Amdt. 192-
of all covered segments by December 17, 95B, 69 FR 18227, Apr. 6, 2004; Amdt.
2012. 192-103, 71 FR 33402, June 8, 2006]
(e) Prior assessment. An operator may
use a prior integrity assessment conducted
before December 17, 2002 as a baseline as- 192.923 How is direct assessment used
sessment for the covered segment, if the and for what threats?
integrity assessment meets the baseline re-
quirements in this subpart and subsequent (a) General. An operator may use direct
remedial actions to address the conditions assessment either as a primary assessment
listed in 192.933 have been carried out. In method or as a supplement to the other as-
addition, if an operator uses this prior as- sessment methods allowed under this sub-
sessment as its baseline assessment, the op- part. An operator may only use direct as-
erator must reassess the line pipe in the sessment as the primary assessment method
covered segment according to the require- to address the identified threats of external
ments of 192.937 and 192.939. corrosion (ECDA), internal corrosion (IC-
(f) Newly identified areas. When an op- DA), and stress corrosion cracking
erator identifies a new high consequence (SCCDA).
area (see 192.905), an operator must com- (b) Primary method. An operator using
plete the baseline assessment of the line direct assessment as a primary assessment
pipe in the newly identified high conse- method must have a plan that complies with
quence area within ten (10) years from the the requirements in
date the area is identified. (1) ASME/ANSI B31.8S (incorporated
(g) Newly installed pipe. An operator by reference see 192.7), section 6.4;
must complete the baseline assessment of a NACE SP0502-2008NACE RP0502-2002
newly-installed segment of pipe covered by (incorporated by reference, see 192.7); and
this subpart within ten (10) years from the 192.925 if addressing external corrosion
date the pipe is installed. An operator may (ECDA).
conduct a pressure test in accordance with (2) ASME/ANSI B31.8S, section 6.4
paragraph (a)(2) of this section, to satisfy and appendix B2, and 192.927 if address-
the requirement for a baseline assessment. ing internal corrosion (ICDA).
(h) Plastic transmission pipeline. If the
threat analysis required in 192.917(d) on a
(3) ASME/ANSI B31.8S, appendix A3, (1) Preassessment. In addition to the re-
and 192.929 if addressing stress corrosion quirements in ASME/ANSI B31.8S section
cracking (SCCDA). 6.4 and NACE SP0502-2008 NACE RP
(c) Supplemental method. An operator 0502-2002, section 3, the plan's procedures
using direct assessment as a supplemental for preassessment must include
assessment method for any applicable threat (i) Provisions for applying more restric-
must have a plan that follows the require- tive criteria when conducting ECDA for the
ments for confirmatory direct assessment in first time on a covered segment; and
192.931. (ii) The basis on which an operator se-
lects at least two different, but complemen-
[Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69777, December tary indirect assessment tools to assess each
15, 2003 as amended by Amdt. 192 95A, 69 ECDA Region. If an operator utilizes an in-
FR 2307, December 22, 2003; Amdt. 192- direct inspection method that is not dis-
103, 71 FR 33402, June 8, 2006; Amdt. cussed in Appendix A of NACE SP0502-
192-114, 74 FR 48593, Aug 11, 2010] 2008 NACE RP0502-2002, the operator
must demonstrate the applicability, valida-
tion basis, equipment used, application pro-
192.925 What are the requirements for cedure, and utilization of data for the inspec-
using External Corrosion Direct Assess- tion method.
ment (ECDA)? (2) Indirect examination. In addition to
the requirements in ASME/ANSI B31.8S
(a) Definition. ECDA is a four-step section 6.4 and NACE SP0502-2008 NACE
process that combines preassessment, indi- RP 0502-2002, section 4, the plan's proce-
rect inspection, direct examination, and post dures for indirect examination of the ECDA
assessment to evaluate the threat of external regions must include
corrosion to the integrity of a pipeline. (i) Provisions for applying more restric-
(b) General requirements. An operator tive criteria when conducting ECDA for the
that uses direct assessment to assess the first time on a covered segment;
threat of external corrosion must follow the (ii) Criteria for identifying and docu-
requirements in this section, in ASME/ANSI menting those indications that must be con-
B31.8S (incorporated by reference see sidered for excavation and direct examina-
192.7), section 6.4, and in NACE SP0502- tion. Minimum identification criteria include
2008 NACE RP 0502-2002 (incorporated by the known sensitivities of assessment tools,
reference see 192.7). An operator must de- the procedures for using each tool, and the
velop and implement a direct assessment approach to be used for decreasing the phys-
plan that has procedures addressing preas- ical spacing of indirect assessment tool read-
sessment, indirect examination, direct ex- ings when the presence of a defect is sus-
amination, and post-assessment. If the EC- pected;
DA detects pipeline coating damage, the op- (iii) Criteria for defining the urgency of
erator must also integrate the data from the excavation and direct examination of each
ECDA with other information from the data indication identified during the indirect ex-
integration (192.917(b)) to evaluate the amination. These criteria must specify how
covered segment for the threat of third party an operator will define the urgency of exca-
damage, and to address the threat as required vating the indication as immediate, sche-
by 192.917(e)(1). duled or monitored; and
nal corrosion, and must provide notification used or where cleaning pigs may deposit
in accordance with 192.921 (a)(4) or electrolytes.
192.937(c)(4). (2) ICDA region identification. An op-
(c) The ICDA plan. An operator must erator's plan must identify where all ICDA
develop and follow an ICDA plan that pro- Regions are located in the transmission sys-
vides for preassessment, identification of tem, in which covered segments are located.
ICDA regions and excavation locations, de- An ICDA Region extends from the location
tailed examination of pipe at excavation lo- where liquid may first enter the pipeline and
cations, and post-assessment evaluation and encompasses the entire area along the pipe-
monitoring. line where internal corrosion may occur and
(1) Preassessment. In the preassessment where further evaluation is needed. An IC-
stage, an operator must gather and integrate DA Region may encompass one or more
data and information needed to evaluate the covered segments. In the identification
feasibility of ICDA for the covered seg- process, an operator must use the model in
ment, and to support use of a model to iden- GRI 02-0057, Internal Corrosion Direct
tify the locations along the pipe segment Assessment of Gas Transmission Pipe-
where electrolyte may accumulate, to iden- linesMethodology, (incorporated by ref-
tify ICDA regions, and to identify areas erence, see 192.7). An operator may use
within the covered segment where liquids another model if the operator demonstrates
may potentially be entrained. This data and it is equivalent to the one shown in GRI 02-
information includes, but is not limited to 0057. A model must consider changes in
(i) All data elements listed in appendix pipe diameter, locations where gas enters a
A2 of ASME/ANSI B31.8S; line (potential to introduce liquid) and loca-
(ii) Information needed to support use of tions down stream of gas draw-offs (where
a model that an operator must use to identi- gas velocity is reduced) to define the critical
fy areas along the pipeline where internal pipe angle of inclination above which water
corrosion is most likely to occur. (See para- film cannot be transported by the gas.
graph (a) of this section.) This information, (3) Identification of locations for exca-
includes, but is not limited to, location of all vation and direct examination. An opera-
gas input and withdrawal points on the line; tor's plan must identify the locations where
location of all low points on covered seg- internal corrosion is most likely in each
ments such as sags, drips, inclines, valves, ICDA region. In the location identification
manifolds, dead-legs, and traps; the eleva- process, an operator must identify a mini-
tion profile of the pipeline in sufficient de- mum of two locations for excavation within
tail that angles of inclination can be calcu- each ICDA Region within a covered seg-
lated for all pipe segments; and the diameter ment and must perform a direct examination
of the pipeline, and the range of expected for internal corrosion at each location, using
gas velocities in the pipeline; ultrasonic thickness measurements, radio-
(iii) Operating experience data that graphy, or other generally accepted mea-
would indicate historic upsets in gas condi- surement technique. One location must be
tions, locations where these upsets have oc- the low point (e.g., sags, drips, valves, ma-
curred, and potential damage resulting from nifolds, dead-legs, traps) within the covered
these upset conditions; and segment nearest to the beginning of the IC-
(iv) Information on covered segments DA Region. The second location must be
where cleaning pigs may not have been further downstream, within a covered seg-
ment, near the end of the ICDA Region. If
corrosion exists at either location, the op- from all integrity assessments that have
erator must been conducted in accordance with the re-
(i) Evaluate the severity of the defect quirements of this subpart, and risk factors
(remaining strength) and remediate the de- specific to the covered segment. If an opera-
fect in accordance with 192.933; tor finds any evidence of corrosion products
(ii) As part of the operator's current in- in the covered segment, the operator must
tegrity assessment either perform additional take prompt action in accordance with one
excavations in each covered segment within of the two following required actions and
the ICDA region, or use an alternative as- remediate the conditions the operator finds
sessment method allowed by this subpart to in accordance with 192.933.
assess the line pipe in each covered segment (A) Conduct excavations of covered
within the ICDA region for internal corro- segments at locations downstream from
sion; and where the electrolyte might have entered the
(iii) Evaluate the potential for internal pipe; or
corrosion in all pipeline segments (both (B) Assess the covered segment using
covered and non-covered) in the operator's another integrity assessment method al-
pipeline system with similar characteristics lowed by this subpart.
to the ICDA region containing the covered (5) Other requirements. The ICDA plan
segment in which the corrosion was found, must also include
and as appropriate, remediate the conditions (i) Criteria an operator will apply in
the operator finds in accordance with making key decisions (e.g., ICDA feasibili-
192.933. ty, definition of ICDA Regions, conditions
(4) Post-assessment evaluation and requiring excavation) in implementing each
monitoring. An operator's plan must pro- stage of the ICDA process;
vide for evaluating the effectiveness of the (ii) Provisions for applying more restric-
ICDA process and continued monitoring of tive criteria when conducting ICDA for the
covered segments where internal corrosion first time on a covered segment and that be-
has been identified. The evaluation and come less stringent as the operator gains
monitoring process includes experience; and
(i) Evaluating the effectiveness of ICDA (iii) Provisions that analysis be carried
as an assessment method for addressing in- out on the entire pipeline in which covered
ternal corrosion and determining whether a segments are present, except that applica-
covered segment should be reassessed at tion of the remediation criteria of 192.933
more frequent intervals than those specified may be limited to covered segments.
in 192.939. An operator must carry out
this evaluation within a year of conducting [Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69777, December
an ICDA; and 15, 2003 as amended by Amdt. 192 95A, 69
(ii) Continually monitoring each cov- FR 2307, December 22, 2003; Amdt. 192-
ered segment where internal corrosion has 95B, 69 FR 18227, April 6, 2004; Amdt.
been identified using techniques such as 192-103, 71 FR 33402, June 8, 2006]
coupons, UT sensors or electronic probes,
periodically drawing off liquids at low
points and chemically analyzing the liquids
for the presence of corrosion products. An
operator must base the frequency of the
monitoring and liquid analysis on results
192.929 What are the requirements for 95B, 69 FR 18227, April 6, 2004; Amdt.
using Direct Assessment for Stress Cor- 192-103, 71 FR 33402, June 8, 2006]
rosion Cracking (SCCDA)?
(a) Definition. Stress Corrosion Crack- 192.931 How may Confirmatory Direct
ing Direct Assessment (SCCDA) is a Assessment (CDA) be used?
process to assess a covered pipe segment
for the presence of SCC primarily by sys- An operator using the confirmatory di-
tematically gathering and analyzing excava- rect assessment (CDA) method as allowed
tion data for pipe having similar operational in 192.937 must have a plan that meets the
characteristics and residing in a similar requirements of this section and of
physical environment. 192.925 (ECDA) and 192.927 (ICDA).
(b) General requirements. An operator (a) Threats. An operator may only use
using direct assessment as an integrity as- CDA on a covered segment to identify
sessment method to address stress corrosion damage resulting from external corrosion or
cracking in a covered pipeline segment internal corrosion.
must have a plan that provides, at mini- (b) External corrosion plan. An opera-
mum, for tor's CDA plan for identifying external cor-
(1) Data gathering and integration. An rosion must comply with 192.925 with the
operator's plan must provide for a systemat- following exceptions.
ic process to collect and evaluate data for all (1) The procedures for indirect exami-
covered segments to identify whether the nation may allow use of only one indirect
conditions for SCC are present and to pri- examination tool suitable for the applica-
oritize the covered segments for assessment. tion.
This process must include gathering and (2) The procedures for direct examina-
evaluating data related to SCC at all sites an tion and remediation must provide that
operator excavates during the conduct of its (i) All immediate action indications
pipeline operations where the criteria in must be excavated for each ECDA region;
ASME/ANSI B31.8S (incorporated by ref- and
erence, see 192.7), appendix A3.3 indicate (ii) At least one high risk indication that
the potential for SCC. This data includes at meets the criteria of scheduled action must
minimum, the data specified in be excavated in each ECDA region.
ASME/ANSI B31.8S, appendix A3. (c) Internal corrosion plan. An opera-
(2) Assessment method. The plan must tor's CDA plan for identifying internal cor-
provide that if conditions for SCC are iden- rosion must comply with 192.927 except
tified in a covered segment, an operator that the plan's procedures for identifying
must assess the covered segment using an locations for excavation may require exca-
integrity assessment method specified in vation of only one high risk location in each
ASME/ANSI B31.8S, appendix A3, and ICDA region.
remediate the threat in accordance with (d) Defects requiring near-term remedi-
ASME/ANSI B31.8S, appendix A3, section ation. If an assessment carried out under
A3.4. paragraph (b) or (c) of this section reveals
any defect requiring remediation prior to the
[Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69777, December next scheduled assessment, the operator
15, 2003 as amended by Amdt. 192 95A, 69 must schedule the next assessment in accor-
FR 2307, December 22, 2003; Amdt. 192- dance with NACE SP0502-2008 NACE RP
prioritizing the conditions for evaluation mediate any of the following within one
and remediation. Unless a special require- year of discovery of the condition:
ment for remediating certain conditions ap- (i) A smooth dent located between the 8
plies, as provided in paragraph (d) of this o'clock and 4 o'clock positions (upper of
section, an operator must follow the sche- the pipe) with a depth greater than 6% of
dule in ASME/ANSI B31.8S (incorporated the pipeline diameter (greater than 0.50
by reference, see 192.7), section 7, Figure inches in depth for a pipeline diameter less
4. If an operator cannot meet the schedule than Nominal Pipe Size (NPS) 12).
for any condition, the operator must explain (ii) A dent with a depth greater than 2%
the reasons why it cannot meet the schedule of the pipeline's diameter (0.250 inches in
and how the changed schedule will not jeo- depth for a pipeline diameter less than NPS
pardize public safety. 12) that affects pipe curvature at a girth
(d) Special requirements for scheduling weld or at a longitudinal seam weld.
remediation.(1) Immediate repair condi- (3) Monitored conditions. An operator
tions. An operator's evaluation and remedia- does not have to schedule the following
tion schedule must follow ASME/ANSI conditions for remediation, but must record
B31.8S, section 7 in providing for imme- and monitor the conditions during subse-
diate repair conditions. To maintain safety, quent risk assessments and integrity as-
an operator must temporarily reduce operat- sessments for any change that may require
ing pressure in accordance with paragraph remediation:
(a) of this section or shut down the pipeline (i) A dent with a depth greater than 6%
until the operator completes the repair of of the pipeline diameter (greater than 0.50
these conditions. An operator must treat the inches in depth for a pipeline diameter less
following conditions as immediate repair than NPS 12) located between the 4 o'clock
conditions: position and the 8 o'clock position (bottom
(i) A calculation of the remaining of the pipe).
strength of the pipe shows a predicted fail- (ii) A dent located between the 8 o'clock
ure pressure less than or equal to 1.1 times and 4 o'clock positions (upper of the
the maximum allowable operating pressure pipe) with a depth greater than 6% of the
at the location of the anomaly. Suitable re- pipeline diameter (greater than 0.50 inches
maining strength calculation methods in- in depth for a pipeline diameter less than
clude, ASME/ANSI B31G; RSTRENG; or Nominal Pipe Size (NPS) 12), and engi-
an alternative equivalent method of remain- neering analyses of the dent demonstrate
ing strength calculation. These documents critical strain levels are not exceeded.
are incorporated by reference and available (iii) A dent with a depth greater than 2%
at the addresses listed in appendix A to part of the pipeline's diameter (0.250 inches in
192. depth for a pipeline diameter less than NPS
(ii) A dent that has any indication of 12) that affects pipe curvature at a girth
metal loss, cracking or a stress riser. weld or a longitudinal seam weld, and engi-
(iii) An indication or anomaly that in the neering analyses of the dent and girth or
judgment of the person designated by the seam weld demonstrate critical strain levels
operator to evaluate the assessment results are not exceeded. These analyses must con-
requires immediate action. sider weld properties.
(2) One-year conditions. Except for
conditions listed in paragraph (d)(1) and [Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69777, December
(d)(3) of this section, an operator must re- 15, 2003 as amended by Amdt. 192 95A, 69
FR 2307, December 22, 2003; Amdt. 192- (i) Using qualified personnel (see
95B, 69 FR 18227, April 6, 2004; Amdt. 192.915) for work an operator is conduct-
192-103, 71 FR 33402, June 8, 2006; Amdt. ing that could adversely affect the integrity
192-104, 72 FR 39012, July 17, 2007] of a covered segment, such as marking, lo-
cating, and direct supervision of known ex-
cavation work.
192.935 What additional preventive (ii) Collecting in a central database in-
and mitigative measures must an opera- formation that is location specific on exca-
tor take? vation damage that occurs in covered and
non covered segments in the transmission
(a) General requirements. An operator system and the root cause analysis to sup-
must take additional measures beyond those port identification of targeted additional
already required by Part 192 to prevent a preventative and mitigative measures in the
pipeline failure and to mitigate the conse- high consequence areas. This information
quences of a pipeline failure in a high con- must include recognized damage that is not
sequence area. An operator must base the required to be reported as an incident under
additional measures on the threats the oper- part 191.
ator has identified to each pipeline segment. (iii) Participating in one-call systems in
(See 192.917) An operator must conduct, locations where covered segments are
in accordance with one of the risk assess- present.
ment approaches in ASME/ANSI B31.8S (iv) Monitoring of excavations con-
(incorporated by reference, see 192.7), ducted on covered pipeline segments by
section 5, a risk analysis of its pipeline to pipeline personnel. If an operator finds
identify additional measures to protect the physical evidence of encroachment involv-
high consequence area and enhance public ing excavation that the operator did not
safety. Such additional measures include, monitor near a covered segment, an opera-
but are not limited to, installing Automatic tor must either excavate the area near the
Shut-off Valves or Remote Control Valves, encroachment or conduct an above ground
installing computerized monitoring and leak survey using methods defined in NACE
detection systems, replacing pipe segments SP0502-2008 NACE RP-0502-2002 (incor-
with pipe of heavier wall thickness, provid- porated by reference, see 192.7). An oper-
ing additional training to personnel on re- ator must excavate, and remediate, in ac-
sponse procedures, conducting drills with cordance with ANSI/ASME B31.8S and
local emergency responders and implement- 192.933 any indication of coating holidays
ing additional inspection and maintenance or discontinuity warranting direct examina-
programs. tion.
(b) Third party damage and outside (2) Outside force damage. If an operator
force damage(1) Third party damage. An determines that outside force (e.g., earth
operator must enhance its damage preven- movement, floods, unstable suspension
tion program, as required under 192.614 of bridge) is a threat to the integrity of a cov-
this part, with respect to a covered segment ered segment, the operator must take meas-
to prevent and minimize the consequences ures to minimize the consequences to the
of a release due to third party damage. En- covered segment from outside force dam-
hanced measures to an existing damage age. These measures include, but are not
prevention program include, at a mini- limited to, increasing the frequency of aeri-
mum al, foot or other methods of patrols, adding
external protection, reducing external stress, (b)(1)(i), (b)(1)(iii) and (b)(1)(iv) of this
and relocating the line. section to the covered segments of the pipe-
(c) Automatic shut-off valves (ASV) or line.
Remote control valves (RCV). If an operator
determines, based on a risk analysis, that an [Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69777, December
ASV or RCV would be an efficient means 15, 2003 as amended by Amdt. 192 95A, 69
of adding protection to a high consequence FR 2307, December 22, 2003; Amdt. 192-
area in the event of a gas release, an opera- 95B, 69 FR 18227, April 6, 2004; Amdt.
tor must install the ASV or RCV. In making 192-103, 71 FR 33402, June 8, 2006] ;
that determination, an operator must, at Amdt. 192-114, 74 FR 48593, Aug 11,
least, consider the following factors 2010
swiftness of leak detection and pipe shut-
down capabilities, the type of gas being
transported, operating pressure, the rate of
potential release, pipeline profile, the poten- 192.937 What is a continual process of
tial for ignition, and location of nearest re- evaluation and assessment to maintain a
sponse personnel. pipeline's integrity?
(d) Pipelines operating below 30%
SMYS. An operator of a transmission pipe- (a) General. After completing the base-
line operating below 30% SMYS located in line integrity assessment of a covered seg-
a high consequence area must follow the ment, an operator must continue to assess
requirements in paragraphs (d)(1) and (d)(2) the line pipe of that segment at the intervals
of this section. An operator of a transmis- specified in 192.939 and periodically eva-
sion pipeline operating below 30% SMYS luate the integrity of each covered pipeline
located in a Class 3 or Class 4 area but not segment as provided in paragraph (b) of this
in a high consequence area must follow the section. An operator must reassess a cov-
requirements in paragraphs (d)(1), (d)(2) ered segment on which a prior assessment is
and (d)(3) of this section. credited as a baseline under 192.921(e) by
(1) Apply the requirements in para- no later than December 17, 2009. An opera-
graphs (b)(1)(i) and (b)(1)(iii) of this sec- tor must reassess a covered segment on
tion to the pipeline; and which a baseline assessment is conducted
(2) Either monitor excavations near the during the baseline period specified in
pipeline, or conduct patrols as required by 192.921(d) by no later than seven years
192.705 of the pipeline at bi-monthly in- after the baseline assessment of that covered
tervals. If an operator finds any indication segment unless the evaluation under para-
of unreported construction activity, the op- graph (b) of this section indicates earlier
erator must conduct a follow up investiga- reassessment.
tion to determine if mechanical damage has (b) Evaluation. An operator must con-
occurred. duct a periodic evaluation as frequently as
(3) Perform semi-annual leak surveys needed to assure the integrity of each cov-
(quarterly for unprotected pipelines or ca- ered segment. The periodic evaluation must
thodically protected pipe where electrical be based on a data integration and risk as-
surveys are impractical). sessment of the entire pipeline as specified
(e) Plastic transmission pipeline. An in 192.917. For plastic transmission pipe-
operator of a plastic transmission pipeline lines, the periodic evaluation is based on the
must apply the requirements in paragraphs threat analysis specified in 192.917(d). For
all other transmission pipelines, the evalua- days before conducting the assessment, in
tion must consider the past and present in- accordance with 192.949. An operator
tegrity assessment results, data integration must also notify a State or local pipeline
and risk assessment information (192.917), safety authority when either a covered seg-
and decisions about remediation (192.933) ment is located in a State where OPS has an
and additional preventive and mitigative interstate agent agreement, or an intrastate
actions (192.935). An operator must use covered segment is regulated by that State.
the results from this evaluation to identify (5) Confirmatory direct assessment
the threats specific to each covered segment when used on a covered segment that is
and the risk represented by these threats. scheduled for reassessment at a period
(c) Assessment methods. In conducting longer than seven years. An operator using
the integrity reassessment, an operator must this reassessment method must comply with
assess the integrity of the line pipe in the 192.931.
covered segment by any of the following
methods as appropriate for the threats to [Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69777, December
which the covered segment is susceptible 15, 2003 as amended by Amdt. 192 95A, 69
(see 192.917), or by confirmatory direct FR 2307, December 22, 2003; Amdt. 192-
assessment under the conditions specified in 95B, 69 FR 18227, April 6, 2004; Amdt.
192.931. 192-103, 71 FR 33402, June 8, 2006]
(1) Internal inspection tool or tools ca-
pable of detecting corrosion, and any other
threats to which the covered segment is sus- 192.939 What are the required reas-
ceptible. An operator must follow sessment intervals?
ASME/ANSI B31.8S (incorporated by ref-
erence, see 192.7), section 6.2 in selecting An operator must comply with the fol-
the appropriate internal inspection tools for lowing requirements in establishing the
the covered segment. reassessment interval for the operator's cov-
(2) Pressure test conducted in accor- ered pipeline segments.
dance with subpart J of this part. An opera- (a) Pipelines operating at or above 30%
tor must use the test pressures specified in SMYS. An operator must establish a reas-
Table 3 of section 5 of ASME/ANSI sessment interval for each covered segment
B31.8S, to justify an extended reassessment operating at or above 30% SMYS in accor-
interval in accordance with 192.939. dance with the requirements of this section.
(3) Direct assessment to address threats The maximum reassessment interval by an
of external corrosion, internal corrosion, or allowable reassessment method is seven
stress corrosion cracking. An operator must years. If an operator establishes a reassess-
conduct the direct assessment in accordance ment interval that is greater than seven
with the requirements listed in 192.923 years, the operator must, within the seven-
and with as applicable, the requirements year period, conduct a confirmatory direct
specified in 192.925, 192.927 or assessment on the covered segment, and
192.929; then conduct the follow-up reassessment at
(4) Other technology that an operator the interval the operator has established. A
demonstrates can provide an equivalent un- reassessment carried out using confirmatory
derstanding of the condition of the line pipe. direct assessment must be done in accor-
An operator choosing this option must noti- dance with 192.931. The table that follows
fy the Office of Pipeline Safety (OPS) 180
this section sets forth the maximum allowed (b) Pipelines Operating Below 30%
reassessment intervals. SMYS. An operator must establish a reas-
(1) Pressure test or internal inspection sessment interval for each covered segment
or other equivalent technology. An operator operating below 30% SMYS in accordance
that uses pressure testing or internal inspec- with the requirements of this section. The
tion as an assessment method must establish maximum reassessment interval by an al-
the reassessment interval for a covered lowable reassessment method is seven
pipeline segment by years. An operator must establish reassess-
(i) Basing the interval on the identified ment by at least one of the following
threats for the covered segment (see (1) Reassessment by pressure test, inter-
192.917) and on the analysis of the results nal inspection or other equivalent technolo-
from the last integrity assessment and from gy following the requirements in paragraph
the data integration and risk assessment re- (a)(1) of this section except that the stress
quired by 192.917; or level referenced in paragraph (a)(1)(ii) of
(ii) Using the intervals specified for dif- this section would be adjusted to reflect the
ferent stress levels of pipeline (operating at lower operating stress level. If an estab-
or above 30% SMYS) listed in lished interval is more than seven years, the
ASME/ANSI B31.8S, section 5, Table 3. operator must conduct by the seventh year
(2) External Corrosion Direct Assess- of the interval either a confirmatory direct
ment. An operator that uses ECDA that assessment in accordance with 192.931, or
meets the requirements of this subpart must a low stress reassessment in accordance
determine the reassessment interval accord- with 192.941.
ing to the requirements in paragraphs 6.2 (2) Reassessment by ECDA following
and 6.3 of NACE SP0502-2008 NACE the requirements in paragraph (a)(2) of this
RP0502-2002 (incorporated by reference, section.
see 192.7). (3) Reassessment by ICDA or SCCDA
(3) Internal Corrosion or SCC Direct following the requirements in paragraph
Assessment. An operator that uses ICDA or (a)(3) of this section.
SCCDA in accordance with the require- (4) Reassessment by confirmatory direct
ments of this subpart must determine the assessment at 7-year intervals in accordance
reassessment interval according to the fol- with 192.931, with reassessment by one of
lowing method. However, the reassessment the methods listed in paragraphs (b)(1)
interval cannot exceed those specified for through (b)(3) of this section by year 20 of
direct assessment in ASME/ANSI B31.8S, the interval.
section 5, Table 3. (5) Reassessment by the low stress as-
(i) Determine the largest defect most sessment method at 7-year intervals in ac-
likely to remain in the covered segment and cordance with 192.941 with reassessment
the corrosion rate appropriate for the pipe, by one of the methods listed in paragraphs
soil and protection conditions; (b)(1) through (b)(3) of this section by year
(ii) Use the largest remaining defect as 20 of the interval.
the size of the largest defect discovered in (6) The following table sets forth the
the SCC or ICDA segment; and maximum reassessment intervals. Also refer
(iii) Estimate the reassessment interval to Appendix E.II for guidance on Assess-
as half the time required for the largest de- ment Methods and Assessment Schedule for
fect to grow to a critical size. Transmission Pipelines Operating Below
30% SMYS. In case of conflict between the
Pipeline operating at
Assessment Me- Pipeline operating at or above 30% SMYS, Pipeline operating
thod or above 50% SMYS up to 50% SMYS below 30% SMYS
Internal Inspection 10 years(*) 15 years(*) 20 years(**)
Tool, Pressure
Test or Direct
Assessment
Confirmatory 7 years 7 years 7 years
Direct
Assessment
Low Stress Not applicable Not applicable 7 years + ongoing
Reassessment actions specified in
192.941
(*) A Confirmatory direct assessment as described in '192.931 must be conducted by year 7 in a 10-year
interval and years 7 and 14 of a 15-year interval.
(**) A low stress reassessment or Confirmatory direct assessment must be conducted by years 7 and 14
of the interval.
[Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69777, December 15, 2003 as amended by Amdt. 192 95A, 69 FR 2307,
December 22, 2003; Amdt. 192-95B, 69 FR 18227, April 6, 2004; Amdt. 192-103, 71 FR 33402,
June 8, 2006; Amdt. 192-114, 74 FR 48593, Aug 11, 2010]
192.941 What is a low stress reassess- thodically protected pipe in a covered seg-
ment? ment, an operator must perform an electrical
survey (i.e. indirect examination tool/method)
(a) General. An operator of a transmis- at least every 7 years on the covered segment.
sion line that operates below 30% SMYS An operator must use the results of each sur-
may use the following method to reassess a vey as part of an overall evaluation of the ca-
covered segment in accordance with thodic protection and corrosion threat for the
192.939. This method of reassessment ad- covered segment. This evaluation must con-
dresses the threats of external and internal sider, at minimum, the leak repair and inspec-
corrosion. The operator must have con- tion records, corrosion monitoring records,
ducted a baseline assessment of the covered exposed pipe inspection records, and the pipe-
segment in accordance with the require- line environment.
ments of 192.919 and 192.921. (2) Unprotected pipe or cathodically pro-
(b) External corrosion. An operator must tected pipe where electrical surveys are im-
take one of the following actions to address practical. If an electrical survey is impractical
external corrosion on the low stress covered on the covered segment an operator must
segment. (i) Conduct leakage surveys as required by
(1) Cathodically protected pipe. To ad- 192.706 at 4-month intervals; and
dress the threat of external corrosion on ca-
(ii) Every 18 months, identify and reme- cannot obtain the internal inspection tools
diate areas of active corrosion by evaluating within the required reassessment period and
leak repair and inspection records, corrosion that the actions the operator is taking in the
monitoring records, exposed pipe inspection interim ensure the integrity of the covered
records, and the pipeline environment. segment.
(c) Internal corrosion. To address the (2) Maintain product supply. An operator
threat of internal corrosion on a covered may be able to justify a longer reassessment
segment, an operator must period for a covered segment if the operator
(1) Conduct a gas analysis for corrosive demonstrates that it cannot maintain local
agents at least once each calendar year; product supply if it conducts the reassessment
(2) Conduct periodic testing of fluids within the required interval.
removed from the segment. At least once (b) How to apply. If one of the conditions
each calendar year test the fluids removed specified in paragraph (a) (1) or (a) (2) of this
from each storage field that may affect a section applies, an operator may seek a waiver
covered segment; and of the required reassessment interval. An op-
(3) At least every seven (7) years, inte- erator must apply for a waiver in accordance
grate data from the analysis and testing re- with 49 U.S.C. 60118(c), at least 180 days be-
quired by paragraphs (c)(1)-(c)(2) with ap- fore the end of the required reassessment in-
plicable internal corrosion leak records, in- terval, unless local product supply issues make
cident reports, safety-related condition re- the period impractical. If local product supply
ports, repair records, patrol records, exposed issues make the period impractical, an opera-
pipe reports, and test records, and define and tor must apply for the waiver as soon as the
implement appropriate remediation actions. need for the waiver becomes known.
[Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69777, December 15, [Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69777, December 15,
2003 as amended by Amdt. 192 95A, 69 FR 2003 as amended by Amdt. 192 95A, 69 FR
2307, December 22, 2003; Amdt. 192-95B, 2307, December 22, 2003; Amdt. 192-95B, 69
69 FR 18227, April 6, 2004] FR 18227, April 6, 2004]
192.943 When can an operator deviate 192.945 What methods must an operator
from these reassessment intervals? use to measure program effectiveness?
(a) Waiver from reassessment interval in (a) General. An operator must include in
limited situations. In the following limited its integrity management program methods to
instances, OPS may allow a waiver from a measure whether the program is effective in
reassessment interval required by 192.939 assessing and evaluating the integrity of each
if OPS finds a waiver would not be inconsis- covered pipeline segment and in protecting the
tent with pipeline safety. high consequence areas. These measures must
(1) Lack of internal inspection tools. An include the four overall performance measures
operator who uses internal inspection as an specified in ASME/ANSI B31.8S (incorpo-
assessment method may be able to justify a rated by reference, see 192.7 of this part),
longer reassessment period for a covered section 9.4, and the specific measures for each
segment if internal inspection tools are not identified threat specified in ASME/ANSI
available to assess the line pipe. To justify B31.8S, Appendix A. An operator must sub-
this, the operator must demonstrate that it mit the four overall performance measures as
that regulates a covered pipeline segment 192.951 Where does an operator file a re-
within that State. port?
Editorial Note: All of Subpart P is new and tion pipeline that serves fewer than 100 cus-
therefore not underlined. tomers from a single source.
Subpart PGas Distribution Pipeline In- [Amdt. 192-113, 74 FR 63905, Dec. 4, 2009,
tegrity Management (IM) Amdt. 192-116, 76 FR 5494, February 1,
2011]
192.1007 What are the required ele- and potential threats. Sources of data may in-
ments of an integrity management plan? clude, but are not limited to, incident and leak
history, corrosion control records, continuing
A written integrity management plan surveillance records, patrolling records, main-
must contain procedures for developing and tenance history, and excavation damage expe-
implementing the following elements: rience.
(a) Knowledge. An operator must dem- (c) Evaluate and rank risk. An operator
onstrate an understanding of its gas distribu- must evaluate the risks associated with its dis-
tion system developed from reasonably tribution pipeline. In this evaluation, the oper-
available information. ator must determine the relative importance of
(1) Identify the characteristics of the each threat and estimate and rank the risks
pipeline's design and operations and the en- posed to its pipeline. This evaluation must
vironmental factors that are necessary to as- consider each applicable current and potential
sess the applicable threats and risks to its gas threat, the likelihood of failure associated with
distribution pipeline. each threat, and the potential consequences of
(2) Consider the information gained such a failure. An operator may subdivide its
from past design, operations, and mainten- pipeline into regions with similar characteris-
ance. tics (e.g., contiguous areas within a distribu-
(3) Identify additional information tion pipeline consisting of mains, services and
needed and provide a plan for gaining that other appurtenances; areas with common ma-
information over time through normal ac- terials or environmental factors), and for
tivities conducted on the pipeline (for exam- which similar actions likely would be effec-
ple, design, construction, operations or tive in reducing risk.
maintenance activities). (d) Identify and implement measures to
(4) Develop and implement a process by address risks. Determine and implement
which the IM program will be reviewed pe- measures designed to reduce the risks from
riodically and refined and improved as failure of its gas distribution pipeline. These
needed. measures must include an effective leak man-
(5) Provide for the capture and retention agement program (unless all leaks are repaired
of data on any new pipeline installed. The when found).
data must include, at a minimum, the loca- (e) Measure performance, monitor results,
tion where the new pipeline is installed and and evaluate effectiveness.
the material of which it is constructed. (1) Develop and monitor performance
(b) Identify threats. The operator must measures from an established baseline to eva-
consider the following categories of threats luate the effectiveness of its IM program. An
to each gas distribution pipeline: Corrosion, operator must consider the results of its per-
natural forces, excavation damage, other formance monitoring in periodically re-
outside force damage, material, weld or joint evaluating the threats and risks. These perfor-
failure (including compression coupling), mance measures must include the following:
equipment failure, incorrect operation, and (i) Number of hazardous leaks either elim-
other concerns that could threaten the integr- inated or repaired as required by 192.703(c)
ity of its pipeline.or welds, equipment fail- of this subchapter (or total number of leaks if
ure, incorrect operations, and other concerns all leaks are repaired when found), categorized
that could threaten the integrity of its pipe- by cause;
line. An operator must consider reasonably (ii) Number of excavation damages;
available information to identify existing
(iii) Number of excavation tickets (re- 192.1009 What must an operator report
ceipt of information by the underground when compression couplings fail?
facility operator from the notification
center);
(iv) Total number of leaks either elimi- Each operator must report, on an annual
nated or repaired, categorized by cause; basis, information related to failure of com-
(v) Number of hazardous leaks either pression couplings, excluding those that result
eliminated or repaired as required by only in non-hazardous leaks, as part of the an-
192.703(c) (or total number of leaks if all nual report required by 191.11 beginning
leaks are repaired when found), categorized with the report submitted March 15, 2011.
by material; and This information must include, at a minimum,
(vi) Any additional measures the opera- location of the failure in the system, nominal
tor determines are needed to evaluate the pipe size, material type, nature of failure in-
effectiveness of the operator's IM program cluding any contribution of local pipeline en-
in controlling each identified threat. vironment, coupling manufacturer, lot number
(f) Periodic Evaluation and Improve- and date of manufacture, and other informa-
ment. An operator must re- tion that can be found in markings on the
evaluate threats and risks on its entire pipe- failed coupling. An operator also must report
line and consider the relevance of threats in this information to the state pipeline safety
one location to other areas. Each operator authority if a state exercises jurisdiction over
must determine the appropriate period for the operator's pipeline.
conducting complete program evaluations (a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this
based on the complexity of its system and section, each operator of a distribution pipe-
changes in factors affecting the risk of fail- line system must submit a report on each me-
ure. An operator must conduct a complete chanical fitting failure, excluding any failure
program re-evaluation at least every five that results only in a nonhazardous leak, on a
years. The operator must consider the results Department of Transportation Form PHMSA
of the performance monitoring in these F-7100.1-2. The report(s) must be submitted
evaluations. in accordance with 191.12.
(g) Report results. Report, on an annual (b) The mechanical fitting failure reporting
basis, the four measures listed in paragraphs requirements in paragraph (a) of this section
(e)(1)(i) through (e)(1)(iv) of this section, as do not apply to the following:
part of the annual report required by (1) Master meter operators;
191.11. An operator also must report the (2) Small LPG operator as defined in
four measures to the state pipeline safety 192.1001; or
authority if a state exercises jurisdiction over (3) LNG facilities.
the operator's pipeline.
[Amdt. 192-116. 76 FR 5494, Feb. 1, 2011]
[Amdt. 192-113, 74 FR 63905, Dec. 4,
2009, Amdt. 192-116, FR 76 5494, Feb 192.1011 What records must an operator
1,2011] keep?
tegrity management plans developed under or a small LPG operator must develop and
this subpart. implement an IM program that includes a
written IM plan as specified in paragraph (b)
[Amdt. 192-113, 74 FR 63905, Dec. 4, of this section. The IM program for these
2009] pipelines should reflect the relative simplicity
of these types of pipelines.
(b) Elements. A written integrity manage-
192.1013 When may an operator deviate ment plan must address, at a minimum, the
from required periodic inspections under following elements:
this part? (1) Knowledge. The operator must demon-
strate knowledge of its pipeline, which, to the
(a) An operator may propose to reduce extent known, should include the approximate
the frequency of periodic inspections and location and material of its pipeline. The oper-
tests required in this part on the basis of the ator must identify additional information
engineering analysis and risk assessment needed and provide a plan for gaining know-
required by this subpart. ledge over time through normal activities con-
(b) An operator must submit its proposal ducted on the pipeline (for example, design,
to the PHMSA Associate Administrator for construction, operations or maintenance ac-
Pipeline Safety or, in the case of an intras- tivities).
tate pipeline facility regulated by the State, (2) Identify threats. The operator must
the appropriate State agency. The applicable consider, at minimum, the following catego-
oversight agency may accept the proposal on ries of threats (existing and potential): Corro-
its own authority, with or without conditions sion, natural forces, excavation damage, other
and limitations, on a showing that the opera- outside force damage, material or weld failure,
tor's proposal, which includes the adjusted equipment failure, and incorrect operation.
interval, will provide an equal or greater (3) Rank risks. The operator must evaluate
overall level of safety. the risks to its pipeline and estimate the rela-
(c) An operator may implement an ap- tive importance of each identified threat.
proved reduction in the frequency of a peri- (4) Identify and implement measures to
odic inspection or test only where the opera- mitigate risks. The operator must determine
tor has developed and implemented an inte- and implement measures designed to reduce
grity management program that provides an the risks from failure of its pipeline.
equal or improved overall level of safety (5) Measure performance, monitor results,
despite the reduced frequency of periodic and evaluate effectiveness. The operator must
inspections. monitor, as a performance measure, the num-
ber of leaks eliminated or repaired on its pipe-
[Amdt. 192-113, 74 FR 63905, Dec. 4, line and their causes.
2009] (6) Periodic evaluation and improvement.
The operator must determine the appropriate
period for conducting IM program evaluations
192.1015 What must a master meter or based on the complexity of its pipeline and
small liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) op- changes in factors affecting the risk of failure.
erator do to implement this subpart? An operator must re-evaluate its entire pro-
gram at least every five years. The operator
(a) General. No later than August 2, must consider the results of the performance
2011 the operator of a master meter system monitoring in these evaluations.
Appendix A[Reserved]
tests must be made as are required for test- reasonably round and straight and that there
ing a girth weld. are no defects which might impair the strength
or tightness of the pipe.
C. Inspection. The pipe must be clean
enough to permit adequate inspection. It B. Similarity of specification require-
must be visually inspected to ensure that it is ments. The edition of the listed specification
reasonably round and straight and there are under which the pipe was manufactured must
no defects which might impair the strength have substantially the same requirements with
or tightness of the pipe. respect to the following properties as a later
edition of that specification listed in section I
D. Tensile properties. If the tensile of this appendix:
properties of the pipe are not known, the (1) Physical (mechanical) properties of
minimum yield strength may be taken as pipe, including yield and tensile strength,
24,000 p.s.i. (165 MPa) or less, or the tensile elongation, and yield to tensile ratio, and test-
properties may be established by performing ing requirements to verify those properties.
tensile test as set forth in API Specification (2) Chemical properties of pipe and testing
5L (incorporated by reference, see 192.7). requirements to verify those properties.
Appendix CQualification of the center, are cut from steel service line and
Welders for Low Stress Level Pipe tested as follows:
(1) One sample is centered in a guided
I. Basic test. The test is made on pipe bend testing machine and bent to the contour
12 inches (305 millimeters) or less in diame- of the die for a distance of 2 inches (51 milli-
ter. The test weld must be made with the meters) on each side of the weld. If the sam-
pipe in a horizontal fixed position so that the ple shows any breaks or cracks after removal
test weld includes at least one section of from the bending machine, it is unacceptable.
overhead position welding. The beveling, (2) The ends of the second sample are flat-
root opening, and other details must con- tened and the entire joint subjected to a tensile
form to the specifications of the procedure strength test. If failure occurs adjacent to or in
under which the welder is being qualified. the weld metal, the weld is unacceptable. If a
Upon completion, the test weld is cut into tensile strength testing machine is not availa-
four coupons and subjected to a root bend ble, this sample must also pass the bending
test. If, as a result of this test, two or more test prescribed in subparagraph (1) of this pa-
of the four coupons develop a crack in the ragraph.
weld material, or between the weld material
and base metal, that is more than 1/8-inch [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970 as amended by
(3.2 millimeters) long in any direction, the Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13, 1998;
weld is unacceptable. Cracks that occur on Amdt. 192-94, 69 FR 32886, June 14, 2004]
the corner of the specimen during testing are
not considered. A welder who successfully
passes a butt-weld qualification test under
this section shall be qualified to weld on all
pipe diameters less than or equal to 12 inch-
es.
Appendix DCriteria for Cathodic Pro- (2) Except as provided in paragraphs (3)
tection and Determination of Measure- and (4) of this paragraph, a minimum negative
ments (cathodic) polarization voltage shift of 100
millivolts. This polarization voltage shift
I. Criteria for cathodic protection must be determined in accordance with sec-
tions III and IV of this appendix.
A. Steel, cast iron, and ductile iron (3) Notwithstanding the alternative mini-
structures. mum criteria in paragraphs (1) and (2) of this
(1) A negative (cathodic) voltage of at paragraph, aluminum, if cathodically pro-
least 0.85 volt, with reference to a saturated tected at voltages in excess of 1.20 volts as
copper-copper sulfate half cell. Determina- measured with reference to a copper-copper
tion of this voltage must be made with the sulfate half cell, in accordance with section IV
protective current applied, and in accordance of this appendix, and compensated for the vol-
with sections II and IV of this appendix. tage (IR) drops other than those across the
(2) A negative (cathodic) voltage shift of structure-electrolyte boundary may suffer cor-
at least 300 millivolts. Determination of this rosion resulting from the build-up of alkali on
voltage shift must be made with the protec- the metal surface. A voltage in excess of 1.20
tive current applied, and in accordance with volts may not be used unless previous test re-
sections II and IV of this appendix. This sults indicate no appreciable corrosion will
criterion of voltage shift applies to structures occur in the particular environment.
not in contact with metals of different anod- (4) Since aluminum may suffer from cor-
ic potentials. rosion under high pH conditions, and since
(3) A minimum negative (cathodic) po- application of cathodic protection tends to in-
larization voltage shift of 100 millivolts. crease the pH at the metal surface, careful in-
This polarization voltage shift must be de- vestigation or testing must be made before ap-
termined in accordance with sections III and plying cathodic protection to stop pitting at-
IV of this appendix. tack on aluminum structures in environments
(4) A voltage at least as negative (ca- with a natural pH in excess of 8.
thodic) as that originally established at the
beginning of the Tafel segment of the E-log- C. Copper structures. A minimum nega-
I curve. This voltage must be measured in tive (cathodic) polarization voltage shift of
accordance with section IV of this appendix. 100 millivolts. This polarization voltage shift
(5) A net protective current from the must be determined in accordance with sec-
electrolyte into the structure surface as tions III and IV of this appendix.
measured by an earth current technique ap-
plied at predetermined current discharge D. Metals of different anodic potentials.
(anodic) points of the structure. A negative (cathodic) voltage, measured in
accordance with section IV of this appendix,
B. Aluminum structures. equal to that required for the most anodic met-
(1) Except as provided in paragraphs (3) al in the system must be maintained. If am-
and (4) of this paragraph, a minimum nega- photeric structures are involved that could be
tive (cathodic) voltage shift of 150 milli- damaged by high alkalinity covered by para-
volts, produced by the application of protec- graphs (3) and (4) of paragraph B of this sec-
tive current. The voltage shift must be de- tion, they must be electrically isolated with
termined in accordance with sections II and insulating flanges, or the equivalent.
IV of this appendix.
To determine which segments of an op- [Amdt. 192-95, 16 FR 69778, Dec. 15, 2003,
erator's transmission pipeline system are as amended by Amdt. 192-95B, 69 FR 18227,
covered for purposes of the integrity man- April 6, 2004; Amdt. 192-95C, 69 FR 29903,
agement program requirements, an operator May 26, 2004]
must identify the high consequence areas.
An operator must use method (1) or (2) from
School
PIR PIR
ABC Pipeline
HCA
Figure E.I.A
II. Guidance on Assessment Methods and sessment methods for addressing time de-
Additional Preventive and Mitigative pendent and independent threats for a trans-
Measures for Transmission Pipelines mission pipeline in an HCA.
(c) Table E.II.3 gives guidance on pre-
(a) Table E.II.1 gives guidance to help ventative & mitigative measures addressing
an operator implement requirements on ad- time dependent and independent threats for
ditional preventive and mitigative measures transmission pipelines that operate below
for addressing time dependent and indepen- 30% SMYS, in HCAs.
dent threats for a transmission pipeline oper-
ating below 30% SMYS not in an HCA (i.e. [Amdt. 192-95, 16 FR 69778, Dec. 15,
outside of potential impact circle) but lo- 2003, as amended by Amdt. 192-95B, 69 FR
cated within a Class 3 or Class 4 Location. 18227, April 6, 2004]
(b) Table E.II.2 gives guidance to help
an operator implement requirements on as-
Table E.II.1: Preventative & Mitigative Measures for Transmission Pipelines Operating
Below 30% SMYS not in an HCA but in a Class 3 and 4 Location
Existing 192 Requirements Additional (to 192 requirements)
Threat
Primary Secondary Preventive and Mitigative Measures
External 455-(Gen. Post 1971), 603-(Gen Oper=n) For Cathodically Protected Transmission Pipe-
Corrosion 457-(Gen. Pre-1971) 613-(Surveillance) line:
459-(Examination),
461-(Ext. coating) $ Perform semi-annual leak surveys.
463-(CP),
465-(Monitoring) For Unprotected Transmission Pipelines or for
467-(Elect isolation), Cathodically Protected Pipe where Electrical
469-Test stations) Surveys are Impractical:
471-(Test leads),
473-(Interference) $ Perform quarterly leak surveys
479-(Atmospheric),
481-(Atmospheric)
485-(Remedial),
705-(Patrol)
706-(Leak survey),
711 (Repair B gen.)
717-(Repair B perm.)
Internal 475-(Gen IC), 53(a)-(Materials) $ Perform semi-annual leak surveys.
Corrosion 477-(IC monitoring) 603-(Gen Oper=n)
485-(Remedial), 613-(Surveillance)
705-(Patrol)
706-(Leak survey),
711 (Repair B gen.)
717-(Repair B perm.)
3rd Party 103-(Gen. Design), 615B(Emerg. Plan) $ Participation in state one-call system,
Damage 111-(Design factor)
317-(Hazard prot), $ Use of qualified operator employees and
327-(Cover) contractors to perform marking and locating of
614-(Dam. Prevent), buried structures and in direct supervision of
616-(Public education) excavation work, AND
705-(Patrol),
707-(Line markers) $ Either monitoring of excavations near oper-
711 (Repair B gen.), ator=s transmission pipelines, or bi-monthly
717-(Repair B perm.) patrol of transmission pipelines in class 3 and 4
locations. Any indications of unreported con-
struction activity would require a follow up in-
vestigation to determine if mechanical damage
occurred.
Table E.II.2 Assessment Requirements for Transmission Pipelines in HCAs (Re-assessment intervals are maximum allowed)
Re-Assessment Requirements (see Note 3)
At or above 30% SMYS
At or above 50% SMYS Below 30% SMYS
up to 50% SMYS
Max Max Max
Baseline Assessment
Re-Assessment Assessment Method Re-Assessment Assessment Method Re-Assessment Assessment Method
Method (see Note 3)
Interval Interval Interval
7 CDA 7 CDA
10 Pressure Test or ILI or DA Preventative & Mitigative (P&M)
Ongoing
Pressure Test or ILI or Measures
15(see Note 1) (see Table E.II.3), (see Note 2)
DA (see Note 1)
Pressure Testing
Repeat inspection cycle
20
every 10 years Repeat inspection cycle Pressure Test or ILI or DA
every 15 years
Repeat inspection cycle every 20 years
7 CDA 7 CDA
10 ILI or DA or Pressure Test Preventative & Mitigative (P&M)
Ongoing
ILI or DA or Pressure Measures
15(see Note 1) (see Table E.II.3), (see Note 2)
In-Line Inspection est (see Note 1)
Repeat inspection cycle
20
every 10 years Repeat inspection cycle ILI or DA or Pressure Test
every 15 years
Repeat inspection cycle every 20 years
7 CDA 7 CDA
10 DA or ILI or Pressure Test Ongoing Preventative & Mitigative (P&M)
DA or ILI or Pressure Measures
15(see Note 1) (see Table E.II.3), (see Note 2)
Test (see Note 1)
Direct Assessment
Repeat inspection cycle
20
every 10 years Repeat inspection cycle DA or ILI or Pressure Test
every 15 years
Repeat inspection cycle every 20 years
Note 1: Operator may choose to utilize CDA at year 14, then utilize ILI, Pressure Test, or DA at year 15 as allowed under ASME B31.8S
Note 2: Operator may choose to utilize CDA at year 7 and 14 in lieu of P&M
Note 3: Operator may utilize other technology that an operator demonstrates can provide an equivalent understanding of the condition of line pipe
Table E.II.3 Preventative & Mitigative Measures addressing Time Dependent and
Independent Threats for Transmission Pipelines that Operate Below 30% SMYS , in HCAs
Existing 192 Requirements Additional (to 192 requirements) Preventive & Mitigative
Threat
Primary Secondary Measures
455-(Gen. Post 1971) 603-(Gen Oper) For Cathodically Protected Trmn. Pipelines
457-(Gen. Pre-1971) 613-(Surveil) $ Perform an electrical survey (i.e. indirect examina-
459-(Examination) tion tool/method) at least every 7 years. Results are to be
461-(Ext. coating) utilized as part of an overall evaluation of the CP system
463-(CP) and corrosion threat for the covered segment. Evaluation
465-(Monitoring) shall include consideration of leak repair and inspection
467-(Elect isolation) records, corrosion monitoring records, exposed pipe in-
469-Test stations) spection records, and the pipeline environment.
External
471-(Test leads)
Corrosion
473-(Interference) For Unprotected Trmn. Pipelines or for Cathodically Pro-
479-(Atmospheric) tected Pipe where Electrical Surveys are Impracticable
481-(Atmospheric) Conduct quarterly leak surveys AND
485-(Remedial) Every 1 years, determine areas of active corrosion
705-(Patrol) by evaluation of leak repair and inspection records,
706-(Leak survey) corrosion monitoring records, exposed pipe inspection
711 (Repair B gen.) records, and the pipeline environment.
717-(Repair B perm.)
475-(Gen IC) 53(a)-(Materials) Obtain and review gas analysis data each calendar
477-(IC monitoring) 603-(Gen Oper) year for corrosive agents from transmission pipelines in
485-(Remedial) 613-(Surveil) HCAs,
705-(Patrol) Periodic testing of fluid removed from pipelines.
706-(Leak survey) Specifically, once each calendar year from each storage
Internal
711 (Repair B gen.) field that may affect transmission pipelines in HCAs,
Corrosion
717-(Repair B perm.) AND
At least every 7 years, integrate data obtained with
applicable internal corrosion leak records, incident re-
ports, safety related condition reports, repair records,
patrol records, exposed pipe reports, and test records.
103-(Gen. Design) 615 B(Emerg Participation in Sate one-call system
111-(Design factor) Plan)
317-(Hazard prot) Use of qualified operator employees and contractors
327-(Cover) to perform marking and locating of buried structures and
614-(Dam. Prevent) in direct supervision of excavation work, AND
3rd Party 616-(Public educat)
Damage 705-(Patrol) Either monitoring of excavations near operator=s
707-(Line markers) transmission pipelines, or bi-monthly patrol of transmis-
711 (Repair B gen.) sion pipelines in HCAs or class 3 and 4 locations. Any
717-(Repair B perm.) indications of unreported construction activity would
require a follow up investigation to determine if mechani-
cal damage occurred.