Professional Documents
Culture Documents
03152151Dt5R8 PDF
03152151Dt5R8 PDF
com
*
) (
.
.
:
.
.
:
. .
. .
. .
: /
:
.
.
.
)
( )
: : .
.
.
: :
. .
.
.
: :
. . .
.
:
.
:
.
:
.
:
:
. : )
(.
. : )
(.
:
.
:
:
. .
. .
. .
. .
. :
.
. : .
. :
.
. :
: .
.
.
. .
: .
:
.
: .
. : .
.
.
-
: . :
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
)(
.
.
.
%
.
% %
. %
.
.
.%
.%
:
.
.
:
.
.
- -
- .
:
Value NPV Net Present
. %
.
= =(% *) +
= = (%*) +
= *) + (
= =(% +)*
%
= +) / (
= =(%+)/
)
(
Insert..Function
. Financial
NPV
OK
.
.
OK
.
.
)
(
.
%
.
)-1000+NPV(6%,500,500,500,30
)+ B2 + NPV(B8,B3,B4,B5,B6
.%
-
: %
%
.
.
) = (*
) = (*
) = (*
:
Period Pay Back
.
) (
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
:
IRR Internal Rate of Return
% .
:
.
.%
Insert..Function
Financial
IRR
OK
.
.
.
) ( .
:
PI Profitability Index
= /
:
%
:
.
.
.
.
.
.
project-valuation-examples.doc
: .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. .
.
.
.
) ( .
.
)(
.
/ .
. :
. )(
) (
.
: ) (
: /
) :
(
: )
(
: :
.
.
.
.
:
Attractiveness Analysis of Industry
.
.
)
( .
: -
:
:
. .
: ) (
- :
) (
.
.
.
: .
: .
: .
.
)
( .
.
.
.
.
.
.
/
.
)( )( )( .
. .
. .
.
:
.
.
: -
) ( :
) (
:
:
)( :
) ( :
:
) (
.
: .
.
- -
.
. )(
.
) ( .
/ .
: .
.
ppt.
:
Attractiveness Segment
.
.
:
Analysis Porters Five Forces
.
.
: .
.
/ :
.
:
.
.
:
.
.
-
Entry Threat of
.
. )(
:
.
:
-
.
.
.
:
.
/ :
. )
(
. /
.
: .
:
.
.
:
.
-
Substitutes Threat of
.
.
/ /
:
.
..) . ( :
:
)(
:
-
Power Buyers Bargaining
-
Power Suppliers Bargaining
.
)( .
.
.
. .
ppt.
.
.
.
) (
.
) (
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
ppt.
.
.
.
.
Introduction
Growth
Maturity
Decline
.
.
.
.
.
. -
.
-
-
.
.
)(
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
:
.
: -
.
.
.
.
:
.
.
.
: :
: :
: ) ( :
: :
) -
(
) (
. -
.
.
.
: .
:
.
.
.
:
.
. .
.
:
.
:
.
:
.
.
.
.
. .
)
( .
Sr000
.
.
.
.
.
.
) ( ) ( Sales Revenue or
Net Sales or Sales or Revenue
) (
) ( .
Gross Profit
..
2,600
)(1,900
700
)(150
450
)(130
290
- 2.9
.
) (
.
. .
: -
) (
.
.
.
) (
Dividend
.
.
.
.
expenses Other )(
Income Other
EBT : Earnings before taxes
Taxes )(
Income Net
: Balance Sheet
)
(
.
.
: )
(
)
(
(
.
510
90
110
710
2,250
3,730
3,130
9,110
9,820
) ( Assets
- ) ( Current Assets
:
) (
) (
- ) ( Fixed Assets
)( :
.
)
( ) ( .
)
(
.
) ( .
) ( Liabilities
. ) (
- Current Liabilities
.
6,000
1,700
1,300
9,000
= +
.
) ( .
Liabilities Current
Payable Accounts
loan Current portion of long term
Expenses Accrued
Liabilities Total Current
Liabilities Long Term
debt Long term
Liabilities Total Long Term
Liabilities Total
)
(
.
.
.
290
326
)(126
50
)(70
100
30
140
)(70
)(50
20
520
2009 250
2009 770
) (
.
Activities Investing
equipment Acquisition of ()
Selling land
activities Total cash flow from investing
Activities Financing
debt Increase in long term
expenses Interest ()
Dividends ()
financing activities Total cash flow from
:
Statement of Retained Earnings
.
6,000 1,300 1,460 8,760
2009
(50) (50)
2009
290 290
2009
Balance at
Dec 31st
2,600
700
290
2.9
710
9,110
9,820
210
610
820
9,000
520
- :
.
-
.
. Symbol look up
-
.
) ( -
.
:
- .
Management, Eugene Brigham et al., Dryden Intermediate Financial
Press, 1999
Stephen Ross et al., McGraw-Hill, 2002 Corporate Finance
.
.
.
:
Resources Analysis
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Advantage Competitive
-
:
.
.
.
: ) (
.
. .
.
Advantage Sustaining Competitive
.
.
.
) (
-
Advantage Cost
.
-
Advantage Differentiation
)(
-
Strategy Cost Leadership
.
Strategy Differentiation
.
.
.
)
( .
.
.
.
.
. :
: .
.
.
.
.
)(
Economies of Scale
.
.
.
.
.
)(
Scope Economies of
.
.
.
.
.
Technology Production
.
.
.
.
Design Process
.
.
.
.
Desing Product
.
.
. .
) (
Costs Input
.
.
.
.
:
.
Effectiveness of the Organization Overall
.
- ) ( :
Contemporary Strategy Analysis, R. Grant, Blackwell, Fourth Edition
Differentiation
Strategy .
- :
.
.
.
.
.
- / :
.
.
:
.
- :
.
.
.
- : /
.
.
%
.
- :
.
.
.
- :
) ( :
.
.
. .
.
) ( .
- -
.
.
.
/
. :
/ -
)
(
.
: :
. :
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. .
:
BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Group BCG: Boston Consulting
. % %
:
. .
: .
: /
GE/McKinsey Portfolio Planning Matrix
: .
: .
:
. )
:
) (
. .
.
.
.
.
FishBone Diagram
.Cause and Effect Diagram
.
.
.
.
: .
.
: .
.
.
.
. .
.
.
. .
.
.
.
.
.
Pareto Chart
% .
.
%
-
% % .
% %
.
Bone Fish
Diagram
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
:
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
// // .
: :
. :
:
.
.
. :
. .
.
- - .
.
.
.
.
.
-
.
.
.
.
.
.
ProModel
ARENA
.
.
.
.
.
.. :
.
.
)(
.
.
.
.
.
:
.
.
. .
:
.
.
. -
.
:
.
:
.
:
.
-
- .
:
.
.
:
.
.
:
.
:
.
:
- .
.
- -
Simulation.
.
) ( .
.
.
.
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
.
.
ProModel
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
= %
= %
= %
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
.
.
.
) ( .
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
=
=
=
ProModel
=
= %
= %
= %
=
= %
= %
) ( = %
=
= %
= %
= %
: %
.
.
) (
= + =
= / =
. .
.
.
.
.
.
:
. .
.
.
.
.
) (.
.
.
.
- :
.
- -
.
.
- : ) (
.
) ( .
.
- :
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
-
.
. .
-
.
:
/
. .
.
:
CheckList
)( -
-
)( ) (
) (
) (
:
Attribute Listing
/
.
. :
.
.
.
:
Thinking Wishful
.
.
.
:
Reversal Problem
:
Idea Wild
:
Fresh Eye
. .
.
.
.
:
BrainSketching
.
- .
.
:
Analogy
.
.
. :
.
.
.
/ .
. :
.
.
.
.
.
:
.
.
) ( .
.
.
.
.
.
:
. .
. .
. :
.
.
.
.
:
.
/
.
:
.
:
.
.
.
.
:
.
: .
.
:
.
.
.
Structure Functional
.
.
.
.
Structure Divisional
. :
-
- .
.
Structure Matrix
.
. :
.
: Environment
: Strategy
: Size
: Technology
. .
.
.
.
Structure Tall Structure and Flat
. : ) (
.
.
decentralization Centralization and
.
.
.
.
.
.
. .
Formalization
Mechanistic and Organic structures
)( .
.
)(
.
.
. .
.
.
.
.
.
. .
.
:
. .
.
.
.
.
- -
.
.
.
.
. .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. :
.
. :
.
.
.
.
)(
.
.
. .
.
.
.
- -
.
.
.
. - -
.
.
. . :
. :
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
M IT
School London Business
Business School Wharton
University Purdue
.
head class Ethics move to
)( .
Tom Rowley, Junior :Interview
.
.
.
. .Ethics Cdoe
.
.
.
Conflict of Interest
.
- -
.
.
UNICEF- Child Labor
Insider Trading .
.
. .
SEC Insider Trading - US
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
***
.
.
. : .
.
. .
. . .
. . . . .
. . .
. . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
In Time Jusy
.
Total Productive Maintenance
.
.
Strategic Alliances
.
Six Sigma .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. .
.
- -
.
- - .
- - .
-
. .
.
.
. .
.
.
.
.
..
! !
!.
.
.
. .
.
.
.
.
.
. .
.
.
.
.
..
..
.
. :
.
.
.
!
.
.
.
.
:
. -
- .
.
. ..
.
.
.
- -
.
. :
. .
) (
Scenario Analysis
.
.
:
.
Sensitivity Analysis
Analysis Scenario
.
.
. %
.% .
) (
) (
) (
.
.
= * )
= * ) ( =
= * ) ( =
.
.
.
Inventory or Stock
.
. .
.
:
.
:
- - .
.
:
.
Just In Time
:
.
.
.
.
:
.
.
:
. .
.
.
.
.
.
.
Raw Material
Work in Process
Finished Goods
Parts Spare
. .
.
:Orderign Cost
.
.
: :Cost Carrying
:Capital Cost
.
: :cost Stockout
.
.
.
.
: :
.
.
.
.
.
.
Just In Time
.
.
.
.
.
TOYOTA JIT
. DELL
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. .
: .
.
: .
.
. .
Economic Order
Quantity
.
Demand
)Lead Time (
Shortage
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
= * \
= * \
= +
*
=
2
= *
.
.
) (
.
.
.
.
.
.
Reorder Point
= *
= *
= =/
= = *
.
. .
.
.
:EOQ
:
.
.
: EOQ
.
.
.
.
: .
.
.
% % .
)( .
% %
.
%
.
% % .
% %
Order cost
. .
.
.
: .
) (..
%
:
.
= + +
. .
.
.
) ( %
.
5.0
1500 601 4.8
= ) ) = (( *) / ( * *
= ) ) = (( *) / ( * *
= ) ) = (( *) / ( * *
:
.
.
= + +
= * + *
/ + * /
= / * * + / * + * =
= / * * + / * + * =
/ * * + / * + * =
=
Visual Basic :
.
.
MSExcel
. .
Sub EOQDis()
Dim TC(100000)
Reading the Problem parameters
Ademand = Worksheets(sheet1).Cells(2, 2)
OCost = Worksheets(sheet1).Cells(3, 2)
Hcost = Worksheets(sheet1).Cells(4, 2)
P1 = Worksheets(sheet1).Cells(7, 2)
P2 = Worksheets(sheet1).Cells(8, 2)
P3 = Worksheets(sheet1).Cells(9, 2)
Q1min = Worksheets(sheet1).Cells(7, 3)
Q2min = Worksheets(sheet1).Cells(8, 3)
Q3min = Worksheets(sheet1).Cells(9, 3)
Q1max = Worksheets(sheet1).Cells(7, 4)
Q1max = Worksheets(sheet1).Cells(7, 4)
Q2max = Worksheets(sheet1).Cells(8, 4)
Q3max = Worksheets(sheet1).Cells(9, 4)
Calculating Total Cost for each quantity for all price ranges
For i = Q1min To Q1max
TC(i) = Ademand * P1 + Ademand * (OCost / i) + Hcost * P1 * (i / 2)
Next i
For i = Q2min To Q2max
TC(i) = Ademand * P2 + Ademand * (OCost / i) + Hcost * P2 * (i / 2)
Next i
For i = Q3min To Q3max
TC(i) = Ademand * P3 + Ademand * (OCost / i) + Hcost * P3 * (i / 2)
Next i
End Sub
.
.
.
.
.
.
****
.
.
.
Just In Time
.
.
.
.
- Planned Maintenance
- :Housekeeping
- Autonomous
:Maintenance
.
.
.
- :
.
.
- :
- - :
.
- :
.
- :
.
.
.
- .
- .
.
.
.
) % (
%
%
-Maintenance Autonomous
- .
.
.
.
- .
- .
- .
.
.
-
.
.
.
TPM
.
.
.
.
- :Cleaning
.
.
.
. .
- :Bolting
.
.
.
.
- : Lubrication
.
.
.
- :
) ( .
- :
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- :
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. -
-
- :
.
- :
.
.
. - -
.
- :
.
- :
- :
.
.
- :
.
- :
- : .
- :
- :
.
.
.
-
) (
- .
.
.
- :
.
.
.
- :
- -
.
- :
.
.
.
- -
- -
.
.
.
.
- :
.
.
.
- :
. .
.
- :
- :
.
.
.
.
:
Availability or Operating Rate
.
= -
-
=
:
.
.
= )%= / (-
:
Rate Operating
.
.
X
=
-
= % = ()/ *
:
Rate Quality
.
-
=
: .
= % = /
:
Overall Equipment Effectiveness
X X =
= % = % *% * %
-
Breakdown Losses
.
:
.
:
.
:
.
:
. ) (
.
:
.
-
Setup and Adjustment Losses
.
.
.
) (
.
:
.
.
.
.
.
.
:
.
.
.
:
.
:
.
-
Idling and Minor Stoppage Losses
.
.
:
. .
: .
:
.
.
.
-
Reduced Speed Loss
.
.
.
-
Quality Defects and Rework
.
.
-
Startup / Yield Losses
.
.
.
- :
.
Maintenance Time Based Maintenance or Periodic
.
.
.
.
.
Maintenance Condition Based Maintenance or Predictive
.
.
.
- :
:
.
.
.
. %
% .
.
.
.
:
.
.
- :
- :
.
- :
.
.
-
Sporadic Losses
.
-
Chronic Losses
.
- :
.
.
- :
.
.
. .
- : .
.
.
P-M Analysis
)(Machine, Material P: Phenonemna an d Physical, M: Mecahnism, Man
- :
- :
.
.
- :
- :
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. .
.
.
- :
.
.
FlexableFlexible
PenumaticPneumatic
ImpllerImpeller
Valv..Valve
- : .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
-
-
-
-
-
. .
.
.
:
- - -
-
.
.
.
.
.
.
:
) (
.
.
.
.
.
.
- :
/ : 4100 -
18 Aug
2006
19570 ) (
12 Nov
2006
20644 -
6 Dec 2006 20879
.
.
.
.
/
Mobil XXXX 15 litre 3
XXXXXX 20 gm 6
Shell XXXX 25 litre 4
) ( .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
: - 120 /
: 62006
: -
:
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. .
.
.
.
.
.
.
Management System - CMMS Computerized Maintenance
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- .
- .
- .
- .
.
.
. )
(
Ergonomics
.
.
.
.
- - -
- .
- .
. .
.
.
. .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
) (
.
.
- -
.
.
.
.
- -
.
)(
)(
.
.
.
%
.
% %
. %
.
.
.%
.%
.
:
.
.
:
.
.
- -
- .
:
Value NPV Net Present
. %
.
= =(% *) +
= = (%*) +
= *) + (
= =(% +)*
%
= +) / (
= =(%+)/
)
(
.
Insert..Function
. Financial
NPV
OK
.
.
) (
.
.
)
(
.
%
.
.
)+ B2 + NPV(B8,B3,B4,B5,B6
.%
-
: %
%
.
.
: ) = (*
) = (*
) = (*
) = (*
.
) (
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
:
IRR Internal Rate of Return
% .
:
.
.%
Insert..Function
Financial
IRR
OK
OK
.
.
.
) ( .
:
PI Profitability Index
= /
:
%
:
.
.
.
.
.
.
project-valuation-examples.doc
: )(
: )(
)
( . )(
)(
Equivalent
Annual Cost
)( )( .
.
: )( )(
.%
.
.
.
.
% % -%
=%
MSExcel ) :
(
)( -
- - - - - -
) :
(
)( -
- - - - -
)= PMT(0.1, 5,2379
)(
.
)(
)= PMT(0.1, 4,2134
)(
.
)(
)(
)(
. )( .
.
)(
)( )(
.
.
)(
.
.
.
. .
)
( .
Sr000
.
.
.
.
) (
) (
) ( .
..
2,600
)(1,900
700
)(150
450
)(70
40
420
)(130
290
- 2.9
.
) (
.
.
.
: -
) (
.
.
.
) (
.
.
.
.
Dividend
.
.
.
.
expenses Other )(
Income Other
Taxes )(
Income Net
LE: EPS Earnings per share in
: Balance Sheet
)
(
.
.
: )
( )
(
(
.
510
90
110
710
2,250
3,730
3,130
9,110
9,820
) ( Assets
- ) ( Current Assets
:
) ( )
(
- ) ( Fixed Assets
)( :
.
) (
) ( .
) (
.
) ( .
) ( Liabilities
.
) (
- Current Liabilities
.
6,000
1,700
1,300
9,000
) ( .
) (
+ =
.
.) (
Liabilities Current
Payable Accounts
loan Current portion of long term
Expenses Accrued
Liabilities Total Current
Liabilities Long Term
debt Long term
Liabilities Total Long Term
Liabilities Total
Equity Shareholders
capital Sahre
Earnings Retained
Reserves
Equity Total Shareholders
.
290
326
)(126
50
)(70
470
)(70
100
30
520
2009 250
2009 770
) ( .
Activities Investing
equipment Acquisition of )(
Selling land
activities Total cash flow from investing
:
Statement of Retained Earnings
.
6,000 1,300 1,460 8,760
2009
)(50 )(50
2009
290 290
2009
6,000 1,300 1,700 9,000
2009
Co. for 2009.. Changes in Shareholders Equity for
Share Retained
LE000 Reserves Total
Capital Earnings
Balance at
Jan 1st
Dividends )( )(
Net Income
for
Balance at
Dec 31st
2,600
700
290
2.9
710
9,110
9,820
210
610
820
9,000
520
2009 770
- :
.
-
.
. Symbol look up
-
.
- ) (
.
.
.
.
.
.
%
. .
Profitability Ratios
-
Net Profit Margin
.
.
.
: %
% .
.
- ) (
Return On Equity ROE
= ) * +
(
:
.
= =( + ) *
= % = /
.
.
-
Return On Assets
) ( .
.
.
.
Efficiency Ratios or Asset Management Ratios or Activity Ratios
-
Inventory Turnover
) (
) ( .
= ) ( /
-
Receivables Turnover
)
( . = )
( /
-
Total Assets Turnover
)
( .
Liquidity Ratios or Financial Strength Ratios
-
Current Ratio
.
.
: .
-
Quick ratio
) (
.
) (
Financial Leverage ratios or debt ratios
-
Debt Ratio
.
.
- ) (
Debt to equity Ratio
-
Dividend Yield
-
Payout Ratio
Market Value Ratios
- ) (
Price to Earnings Ratio P/E
) ( .
: )
(
% .
%
-
Market to Book Value
= /
1,500,000 1,410,000
780,000 685,000
820,000 725,000
546,000 420,000
1,820,000 1,500,000
3,300,000 2,700,000
1,550,000 1,330,000
1,910,000 1,400,000
1,390,000 1,300,000
350,000 380,000
310,000 260,000
127 112
31,500,000 31,500,000
455,000 390,000
1,345,350
365,000
285,000
3,000,000
17.3
14.4
44.1
2005
Gross Profit Margin 54.7%
Net Profit Margin 36.4%
40.6% )Return On Equity (ROE
)Return On Assets (ROA 18.2%
Inventory Turnover 12.14
Accounts Receivable
5.26
Turnover
Total Assets Turnover 0.5
Current Ratio 1.17
Quick Ratio 0.95
Debt Ratio 0.58
Debt to Equity Ratio 137.4%
Dividend Yield 11.4%
Payout Ratio 83.3%
Price to Earning Ratio 7.3
Market to Book value 2.9
- :
0.4
.
.
: .
: .
.
.
: .
7% 8% 9%
12% 16% 15%
6% 5% 9%
2.5 3 6
2.2 2.7 2.3
.
.
.
.
.
5.5% 6.0%
14% 11%
5% 4%
8 10
1.1 1.8
70% 40%
. .
.
.
.
.
.
. .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
)(51,000 )(44,000
)(41,000 )(28,000
988,000 648,000
)(3,100 )(2,850
8,100 9,200
993,000 654,350
)(198,600 )(130,870
794,400 523,480
- 19.86 12.92
.
2005 2004
300,000 185,000
230,000 218,000
520,000 370,000
1,050,000 773,000
950,000 1,120,000
450,000 520,000
2,100,000 1,650,000
3,500,000 3,490,000
4,550,000 4,063,000
320,000 300,000
12,000 9,000
1,700,000 1,700,000
1,200,000 1,050,000
426,800 257,900
3,326,800 3,007,900
40,000,000
1,830,000 1,350,000
750,000 630,000
1,080,000 720,000
794,400 523,480
19.86 12.92
1,050,000 773,000
3,500,000 3,490,000
4,550,000 4,063,000
333,200 310,100
890,000 745,000
1,223,200 1,055,100
3,326,800 3,007,900
230,000 218,000
520,000 370,000
2005
2005 2004 2003 2002 2001
59.0% 53.3% 54.0% 51.0% 52.0%
43.3% 38.8% 40.3% 39.3% 43.3%
25.1% 17.3% 16.1% 15.8% 16.4%
18.4% 12.9% 14.4% 12.4% 12.1%
3.35 3.1 3.38 3.5 3.6
4.11 3.55 4.51 3.38 4.61
0.42 0.39 0.36 0.32 0.38
3.15 3.05 2.98 2.55 2.35
2.46 2.16 2.26 2.00 1.93
0.27 0.24 0.41 0.52 0.57
36.8% 35.8% 46.8% 56.8% 61.8%
7.9% 5.5% 4.9% 4.5% 3.9%
59.9% 61.1% 45.9% 43.9% 39.9%
11.8 11.1 10.8 9.2 8.8
2.8 1.9 2.3 2.6 2.9
.
.
.
:
.
.
.
.
.
. .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
) ( :
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. .
Cover
. -
- .
.
.
-
- .
.
.
. - -
-
- .
Title Page
- -
- .
- -
.
. -
-
- -
.
Summary Abstract or Summary or Executive
: . -
-
:
)(
.
.
) (
.
.
.
: .
.
.
CONTENTS TABLE OF
.
.
.
LIST OF FIGURES
) (
.
LIST OF TABLES
Symbols or Glossary List of
. .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Introduction
:
.
.
-
- )
(
- ) (
-
.
.
.
.
%
.
Main Body
.
.
.
: - - -
: -
- -
: - -
-
-
- :
) (
.
Recommendations Conclusions or
.
.
.
-
- .
.
.
.
.
References
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
) ( .
. .
.
.
.
Attachements Appendix (Appendices) or
)( .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Cover
..
.
.
.
-
..
..
.
- -
.
-
:
.
- :
Summary Abstract or Summary or Executive
.
: -
Executive Summary
The analysis of the local selling orders of 2001, obtained from the
information system, showed that the average total lead time is 70
days with a standard deviation of 43 days. 25% of the items have a
lead time of less than 25 days and 25% of the items have a lead time
of more than 110 days. The data analysis shows some potential
reasons for the long lead time such as: the seasonality pattern of the
local orders, supplier delay, and variability of processing times.
CONTENTS TABLE OF
) (
Table of Contents
Page
iv List of Figures
v List of Tables
vi Glossary
1 1. Introduction and Literature Review
1 1.1 Introduction
4 1.2 Literature Review
14 2.Physical Background
14 2.1 Flow Past a Rigid Sphere
17 2.2 Flow Acting on a Spherical Bubble
24 3. Methodology
24 3.1 Mathematical Formulation
29 3.2 Numerical Procedure
1
: 2
5
9
12
15
- : 17
- : 20
LIST OF FIGURES
) (
.
List of Figures
Page
2 Fig. 1.1: Schematic drawing of two phase flow
6 Fig. 1.2: Bubble Shapes
16 Fig. 2.1: Drag force on a raising bubble
20 Fig. 2.2: Lift force on a rigid sphere
22 Fig. 2.3: Comparison of Theoretical and experimental results
34 Fig. 3.1: Grid types
Fig. 3.2: Schematic drawing of the applied boundary
28
conditions
: 1
: 3
: 5
: 9
: 11
LIST OF TABLES
List of Tables
Page
3 Table 1.1: Sales of product A in previous years
4 Table 1.2: Sales of Product B in previous years
6 Table 1.3: Production Capacity of all Products
9 Table 2.1: Customer Survey Results
10 Table 2.2: Raw Material Cost in 2005
12 Table 2.3: Marketing Expenses in 2005
15 Table 3.1: Market Demand Forecast
16 Table 3.2: Sales Forecast
18 Table 3.3: Different Scenarios
21 Table 3.4: Production Plan
28 Table B.1: Forecast Methodology
Symbols or Glossary List of
.
:
Introduction
Main Body
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Recommendations Conclusions or
.
.
.
.
-
-
-
References
: )(
References
3. D. Moore, The boundary layer on a spherical bubble, J. Fluid Mech., Vol. 16,
pp. 161-176, 1963.
5. P. Saffman, On the rise of small air bubbles in water, J. Fluid Mech., Vol. 1,
pp. 249-275, 1956.
: )(
)(
References
Ahmed, S., Hassan, M., Taha, Z., 2005. TPM can go beyond maintenance: excerpt
from a case implementation. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering 11
Ahmed, S., Hassan, M., Taha, Z., 2004. State of implementation of TPM in SMIs:
a survey study in Malaysia. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering 10 (2),
93106.
Arbuckle, J.L., Wothke, W., 1999. Amos 4.0 Users Guide. SmallWaters
Corporation, Chicago, Illinois.
Bamber, C., Sharp, J., Hides, M., 1999. Factors affecting successful
implementation of total productive maintenance- AUK manufacturing case study
perspective. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering 5 (3), 162-81.
Bentler, P., Bonnet, D., 1980. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis
of covariances structures. Psychological Bulletin 88 (3), 588-606.
Browne, M., Cudeck, R., 1993. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: K.
Bollen and J.S. Long (ed.), Testing Structural Equation Models. Sage, Newbury
Park, California, pp. 136-162.
Carmines, E., McIver, J., 1981. Analyzing models with unobserved variables. In:
G. Bohrnstedt and E. Borgatta, (Eds), Social measurement: current issues. Sage,
Beverly Hills, California: pp. 65-115.
.
http://owl.english.purdue.edu/handouts/research/r_docsources.html
http://www.eurosurveillance.org/authors/authors-02.asp
http://physics.gac.edu/~huber/misc/aiprefs.htm
http://www.if-pan.krakow.pl/pjp/note.html
http://www.roma.unisa.edu.au/07118/language/reports.htm#Referencing
Attachments Appendix (Appendices) or
http://www.writing.eng.vt.edu/index.html
http://owl.english.purdue.edu/workshops/hypertext/reportW/introduction.html
http://www.ucalgary.ca/it/mswordthesisstylefiles/index.htm
http://www.glan-
hafren.ac.uk/LearnCent/StudyGuides/BusinessReportWriting.pdf
http://unilearning.uow.edu.au/report/4b.html
/http://owl.english.purdue.edu/handouts/pw
http://hsc.csu.edu.au/business_studies/intro/writing/writing.html#WHY
http://www.sec.gov/pdf/handbook.pdf
http://www.ecf.toronto.edu/~writing/handbook-shrtrept.html
http://www2.umist.ac.uk/chemistry/communication/shortreport.html
http://bestentrepreneur.murdoch.edu.au/Guide_To_Report_Writing.pdf
http://oregonstate.edu/dept/eli/buswrite/Business_Writing_Help.html
http://www.uoregon.edu/~ddusseau/101/199/style.html
http://bschool.washington.edu/bwrite/business_doc.shtml
.
.
Cover
Title Page
.
-
:
.
- :
Summary Abstract or Summary or Executive
CONTENTS TABLE OF
Table of Contents
Page
iv List of Figures
v List of Tables
vi Glossary
1 1. Introduction and Literature Review
1 1.1 Introduction
4 1.2 Literature Review
14 2.Physical Background
14 2.1 Flow Past a Rigid Sphere
17 2.2 Flow Acting on a Spherical Bubble
24 3. Methodology
24 Mathematical Formulation
29 Numerical Procedure
36 4. Results and Discussion
36 4.1 List of cases
42 4.2 Forces
49 4.3 Velocities
57 5. Conclusions
59 6. Recommendations
60 References
63 Appendix A
.
)(
LIST OF FIGURES
List of Figures
Page
2 Fig. 1.1: Schematic drawing of two phase flow
6 Figure 1.2: Bubble Shapes
16 Figure 2.1: Drag force on a raising bubble
20 Fig. 2.2: Lift force on a rigid sphere
Figure 2.3- Comparison of Theoretical and experimental
22
results
34 Fig. 3.1- Grid types
Fig. 3.2: Schematic drawing of the applied boundary
28
conditions
38 Fig. 4.1: Results of case I
42 Fig. 4.2: Results of case II
.
Fig. or Figure
.
: 1
3 :
: 5
LIST OF TABLES
List of Table
Page
3 Table 1.1: Sales of product A in previous years
4 Table 1.2: Sales of Product B in previous years
6 Table 1.3: Production Capacity of all Products
9 Table 2.1: Customer Survey Results
10 Table 2.2: Raw Material Cost in 2005
12 Table 2.3: Marketing Expenses in 2005
15 Table 3.1: Market Demand Forecast
16 Table 3.2: Sales Forecast
18 Table 3.3: Different Scenarios
21 Table 3.4: Production Plan
28 Table B.1: Forecast Methodology
.
List of Tables
: 1
: 2
: 5
: 9
: 12
: 15
Symbols or Glossary List of
-
-
. .
Introduction
.
.
.
Main Body
- -
- -
.
. .
.
. .
.
.
Microsoft Project
. .
Recommendations Conclusions or
.
.
.
.
-
-
-
References
References
3. D. Moore, 1963, The boundary layer on a spherical bubble, J. Fluid Mech., Vol.
5. P. Saffman, On the rise of small air bubbles in water, J. Fluid Mech., Vol.
(1), 249-275, 1956.
Attachments Appendix (Appendices) or
:
.
:
)(
.
:
.
-
.
. .
.
.
.
-
.
.
-
.
.
-
.
-
.
- .
-
.
. .
.
.
-
. -
-
- .
-
.
http://owl.english.purdue.edu/workshops/hypertext/reportW/bodyresults1.html
http://www.writing.eng.vt.edu/other/illustration.html
http://lilt.ilstu.edu/gmklass/pos138/datadisplay/sections/goodtables.htm
http://lorien.ncl.ac.uk/ming/dept/Tips/writing/data.pdf
http://www.zju.edu.cn/jzus/2004/0409/040922.pdf
http://www.io.com/~hcexres/textbook/graphics. html#tables
/
Mobil XXXX 15 litre 3
XXXXXX 20 gm 6
Shell XXXX 25 litre 4
..
1,830,000 1,350,300
)(51,000 )(44,000
)(41,000 )(28,000
988,000 648,000
)(3,100 )(2,850
8,100 9,200
993,000 654,350
)(198,600 )(130,870
794,400 523,480
- 19.86 12.92
.
.
. .
.
.
.
2005
1,830,000 1,350,300
3550 145000
1,080,000 720,000
9,500,400 67500
890 755
13,402,840 2,931,556
: -
.
.
.
.
.
:-
. . :
. .
: -
.
.
. .
.
.
.
.
.
: -
: -
: -
: -
: - //
: - //
.
.
. :
. : ) ( ) (.
: -
.
.
:
: 62006
:
..
:
: 62006
:
..
- - - -
.
. .
.
.
. .
.
: - 120 /
: 62006
: -
:
:
: 62006
:
-
.
Presentation .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Slides
Power Point
.
.
.
.
.
.
) Powerpoint (
.
.
: Title
.
.
- -
.
.
:
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Slides .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. .
.
.
.
.
. .
Data Show
.
)(
.
.
.
.
. .
.
.
.
.
- . .
.
.
.
.
.
. .
.
- .
.
- .
.
- . .
.
.
.
.
.
. .
:
- .
presentation-mistakes.ppt
.
- -
.
.
.
.
- .
.
.
- .
-
.
.
.
)(
: :
.
: )
( .
. .
.
.
) (
.
)( : .
.
.
.
.
.
: .
.
.
.
.
.
.
. .
.
.
:
- .
.
.
. ) (
. ) (
.
. ) (
.
. - -
:
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
: .
.
: .
.
.
.
: .
.
.
.
:
.
.
.
.
.
:
. .
:
.
.
.
.
: .
.
:
.
.
:
.
.
:
.
.
.
: .
.
.
: ) ( .
: .
.
: .
.
.
) (
.
.
.
.
.
. .
.
.
- - .
.
.
.
.
.
- .
-
) (
- .
- .
- .
- )(
- .
- .
- ..
Meeting Invitation
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
-
-
-
:
: -
- ) (
- ) (
- ) (
.
.
. .
.
.
.Minutes of Meeting
:
. .
.
. MP3
.
.
.
.
. .
.
.
.
. .
.
. .
.
.
.
: -
.
.
.
. -
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Gantt Chart
.
Bars
.
.
.
Henery Gantt
. .
.
.
.
Gantt Chart
. .
.
.
MSWord Excel MSProject
. .
. .
.
.
.
.
. .
.
.
!!!
.
.
. .
.
.
.
. .
.
.
.
.
.
. .
. .
.
.
. .
.
.
Server .
Basic, Fortran C, Visual
.
. -
- .
. Visual Basic
.
.
.
Access Excel, Word, Power Point VBA
Visual Basic for Applications . VBA
VBA .
.
. .
VBA .
Record Macro
.
. -
- .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
)(Sub calc
For i = 3 To 14
)a = Worksheets(sheet1).Cells(i, 2
Sum = Sum + a
Next i
End Sub
.Subroutine
For Next .
i .
a .
i
)Worksheets(sheet1).Cells(i, 2
a sum
For .Next
Sum = Sum + a
a
.
.
.
VB VBA
VB VBA
VB
.VB
VBA
.VBA VBA
VB VBA
.VB
.
.
. .
.
. -
RSS
.
.
.
.
Bloglines.com
/http://ranchero.com/software/netnewswire
/http://www.awasu.com
/http://www.rssowl.org
:
.
. .
.
) (
Internet Explorer
/http://www.rssfwd.com
.
/http://samehar.wordpress.com/feed
BBC
: : *
8*9=72
= E
100 F in C
) (
) (
define JIT
.
.
.
:
.
:
BCC
:
.
:
.
: .
.
:
.
.
.
: . :
.
)(
) (
.
. .
.
:
. :
Google Trends
.
. .
. .
.
.
.
CopyPaste
- .
.
.
.
.. .
.
.
.
Lecture slides / presentation
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. :
. :
. :
.
Manufacturing Cellular
. - - .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. .
.
.
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
. .
- :
- :
- :
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
) ( .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Overseas Training
.
.
.
.
.
.
Training Needs assessment
:
.
.
.
:
.
:
.
Evaluation Training
) (
.
.
.
- :
.
.
.
.
- :
.
.
- :
.
.
.
.
) (
- :
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- : .
.
- :
.
- :
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. :
.
.
: .
.
.
. .
.
:Data-Show
.
.
.
:Overhead Projector
.
.
: )(
.
.
) (
.
.
:
.
.
:Lecture - -
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
:Case Study
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
)( :Role Play
.
.
.
.
.
.
:Simulation by Equipment
.
:Audio Visual Tools Training using
.
.
.
. .
.
.
.
.
.
.
:
.
.
.
.
.
.
) ( .
.
.
.
.
.
. :
. :
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. :
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
:
.
:
.
: .
.
.
.
.
Organizational Culture
.
.
.
.. .
.
.
.
:Entrepreneurial Culture
.
:Club Culture
:Bureaucratic Culture
.
M .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- -
) (
.
.
. .
.
.
.
.
.
- -
.
. :
. .
) (
Scenario Analysis
.
.
:
.
Sensitivity Analysis
.
.
. %
.% .
) (
) (
) (
.
.
= * )
= * ) ( =
= * ) ( =
= * ) ( =
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
:
. .
: .
:
.
.
.
: .
.
.
.
.
.
Operations Management
.
.
.
:
.
)(
- / /
- )(
- -
MBA..
.
.
)
( .
:
:
. .
:
.
:
.
:
.
-
.
.
- -
.
.
- :
- :
.
- :
- :
.
-
:
- :
.
.
TOEFL
GMAT
: .
.
.
. .
.
.
: %
%
: %
:
. .
% + %
. % ..% ..%
%
: .
%
% % .
% %
% . %
.
.
.
.
. .
Good Morning
) (
.
.
!!!
.
.
.
. .
.
.
- .
.
.
.
Shoes
Bathroom
Toilet
.
.
.
.
.
.
)( .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
:
.. . .
.
.
..
..
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. _
. .
.
. .
.
.
.
.
.
.
-
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. .
.
)( -
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
-
.
.
. .
- - .
) (.
.
- -
.
. :
:
.
.
.
.
.
. .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. .
. - -
.
.
.
.
- -.
. :
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- -
.
)(
.
.
.
.
.
.
. .
.
.
.
.
:
.
) ( .
.
.
.
.
-
:
hkhaleelq@cv.com
Hassan K. Fareed
4 Khaleel Khalle St.,
Cairo, Egypt
:
:
:
:
Personal Information
Date of Birth: October 26th, 1985
Marital Status: Married
Military Servcie: Exempted
Nationality: Egyptian
:
. .
-
:
- -
Education
University of London, Imperial College, UK 1994-1995
MSc in Advanced Mech. Engineering
: .
- -
Work Experience
SAMAA Co., Cairo, Egypt Jan 1995- Present
Production Engineer Acid Plant
)Supervised the operations of a plant (productivity 200 tons/day
Modified the main equipment and increased productivity by 15%
Trained 20 production technicians
Saved 200000 LE by improving the maintenance system
: .
.
Languages
Arabic Mother Tongue
English Good
Computer Skills
Office Highly skilled in Windows, MS
Basic Awareness of AutoCAD
: .
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
MSWorsd
.
.
. :
.
PM Preventive
.Maintenance BSC,
.MSc, PhD
http://www.balagh.com/najah/ca1du7jk.htm
http://www.rclub.ws/?p=9
http://jobs-trial.moheet.com/how-choose.asp
http://www.najah.edu/ARABIC/newsletter/issue70/14.htm
http://hewar.khayma.com/showthread.php?p=395307#post
395307
http://www.alriyadh.com/2005/07/26/article83800.html
http://alumni.uaeu.ac.ae/latesnews/cv/cv.htm
.
.
.
.
.
:
.
cv-example-a.doc
: .
cv-exmaple-arabic.doc
Errors in CV Writing.doc
.
.
.
- -
.
.
.
. .
.
. .
.
.
.
.
. .
.
- -
.
.
.
.
:
.. .
.
.
.
.
. .
.
***********
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. :
. :
Interviewing- Virginia Tech
Questions Job Interview
Monster Career Advice
Interview Preparation Guide
Work Interviews - BBC
Interview Preparation
.
-
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. .
.
.
.
..
.
.
.
.
:
.
. .
.
.
- -
Civileng5@yahoo.com
Civileng5@hotmail.com
Civileng5@skype.com
Civileng5@icq.com
Civileng5@ovoo.com
Tel\ +2-0126946364
2006-2007
Next