Static Balance PDF

STATIC BALANCE DUCT SIZING
METHOD
Author:
Engr. K.H., Kong is Mechanical Engineer
(IEM member, No: M21065)
Bachelors Degree with Honors with Distinction in Mechanical Engineering
STATIC BALANCE DUCT DESIGN METHOD
ABSTRACT
Generally, the duct design methods for low velocity supply air system that are
currently used include
1. Velocity reduction
2. Equal Friction, and
3. Static Regain
In this write up, a novel duct design method, known as the static balance duct
design method, is introduced. In this method, the duct looping or network principle is
applied to achieve static balance. The Static balance method is an intelligent self-
balance method to achieve minimum static losses across the ducting network. In turn,
energy consumption is reduced.
Static balance method is also well applicable to the variable air volume (VAV)
system. It reduces the system response time, the operating static losses within the duct
network system, and enhances the energy saving.
1.0 INTRODUCTION
In this write up, the description for the conventional and static balance duct
design method is presented in chapter 2. The Equal friction and static balance
methods are compared and discussed in detail. Chapter 3 discusses about the equal
friction method. A few equations involved in the development of the equal friction
method are presented. In chapter 4, the development and the principal of static
balance method are discussed in relation to the equal friction method. Comparisons of
the equal friction and static balance are discussed in chapter 5. Chapter 6 brings up the
advantages of the static balance method for VAV system and followed by a final
conclusion.
Copyright 2008 by Kok-Haw Kong Page 2 of 24

All right reserved.
2.0 DUCT DESIGN METHOD
The conventional duct design method includes:

1. the velocity reduction method
2. the equal friction method, and
3. the static regain method.
The novel duct design method is static balance method.
In the velocity reduction duct design method, the controlling factor is the air
velocity in the duct. This is mainly to prevent noise due to high air velocity. Basically,
the duct velocity is determined before the duct size is selected. With the air velocity,
the duct diameter size is computed. Then, the actual round or rectangular duct size is
selected and the relevant static loss is calculated accordingly.
The Equal friction method is widely used due to its simplicity and flexibility.
This method is based on the assumption that the friction loss per unit of length is
consistent for the entire system. Usually, the initial friction loss per unit of length is
determined. Then the duct size throughout the entire ducting system is selected
according to the air flow rate relative to the determined friction loss. The total friction
loss in the duct system is calculated based on the duct run with the highest resistance,
including the friction loss through all elbows and fittings in the section. For any site
coordination or adjustment, the duct size is changed based on the same static loss
coefficient. However, the drawback of the equal friction method is that the system is
difficult to balance if the design has a mixture of short and long runs. Where the
pressure difference between short and long runs is large, and requires considerable
dampering on system.
In the static regain method, the duct is designed in such a way that at each
branch, the available static pressure is used to offset the friction loss on the
subsequent section of duct. The static pressure remains constant before each terminal
and at each branch. This method requires more complicated and time consuming
design procedures and methods. It also uses more duct materials as compared to the
equal friction method.

All right reserved.
The Static balance duct design method presented here comprises a duct
looping network, which consists of ducts of various sizes, geometric orientations, and
fittings. It is designed based on the principle of equal friction method which offers
lower friction losses but more duct work. Similarly to all networks system, this
method implements the continuity and the work-energy principles throughout the
network. The solution of the static balance method is obtained through a trial-and-
correction or iteration process.
3.0 EQUAL FRICTION DUCT DESIGN METHOD
The Equal friction method uses the same friction loss per unit of length for the
entire system. In any duct section in which the air is flowing through, there is a static
loss. This loss is named as the friction loss which is related to the followings:
1) Duct size,
2) Interior surface roughness,
3) Air flow rate, and
4) Duct length
The relationship of these factors is represented by the following equation:

1.22 1.82
P 1 V
= 67.18 f eq. 3.1
L de 1000
or
P Q 1.82
= 3 x10 7 f 4.86 eq. 3.2
L de
where P = friction loss (Pa)
f = interior surface roughness
L = duct length (m)
de = duct diameter or equivalent diameter for rectangular duct (mm)
V = air velocity (m/s)
Q = air flow rate (l/s)
The equivalent diameter for a rectangular duct can be further related as follows:

All right reserved.
0.625
de = 1.3
(ab )
eq. 3.3
(a + b )0.25
where de = duct diameter or equivalent diameter for a rectangular duct (mm)
a and b = duct size (mm)
Another useful parameter derived from the velocity pressure is the velocity head,
hv = 0.6137V 2 eq. 3.4
or
Q2
hv = 1x10 6 4
eq. 3.5
de
where hv = velocity head (Pa),
V = air velocity (m/s)
Q = air flow rate (l/s)
de = duct diameter or equivalent diameter for rectangular duct (mm)
The friction loss of fittings can be related to the velocity pressure by adding a
multiplier or coefficient. The coefficient for various fittings is tabulated below:
Fittings Coefficient, C
Transition 0.25
Elbow 0.27
Wye 0.30
Tee 0.37
The static loss through fittings is represented by the following equation:

Pf = Chv eq. 3.6
where Pf = static loss through fittings, (Pa)

hv = velocity head (Pa),
C = fitting coefficient
In any duct system for the equal friction method, the duct is sized based on a
desired friction loss per unit length of duct. The equations shown above are used to
calculate the static loss. The static loss of each section of the duct runs is
accumulated. Only the duct runs with highest resistance is calculated, where this is the

All right reserved.
static required for the fan to overcome it. The highest static loss may not be the
longest duct run, rather it can be a shorter duct with more bends and fittings.
3.1 Example for Equal Friction Duct Design Method
Figure 3.1 shows a simple duct system for hospital ward rooms. In this
simulation, the ward rooms are located at perimeter whereas offices, the procedure
room and the nurse station are located at center of the zone.
Referring to figure 3.1, the fan discharge air flow rate is 4800 l/s and there are
16 branches or air terminals with 300 l/s each. The friction loss is limited to 1 Pa/m.
Duct is made of galvanized sheet with the interior surface roughness of 0.9.
The duct runs with the highest static loss is from point O to P. The static loss
calculation is tabulated in table 3.1 and the duct design is shown in figure 3.2. Here,
the friction loss per unit length is selected to be 1 Pa/m. In actual situation, due to the
limitation of discrete duct sizes, the friction loss is re-calculated according to the duct
size selected.
From calculation, the accumulated static loss is 64 Pa from point O to P.

All right reserved.
Design Calc. Straight Fitting Total Static

Air Air Static Cumulative
Static Duct Size (mm) Static Duct hv Static Static Loss
Item Point Description Flow Velocity Loss C Static Loss
Loss WxH Loss / L Length (Pa) Loss Loss (in.
(L/S) (m/s) (Pa) (Pa)
(Pa/m) (Pa/m) (m) (Pa) (Pa) wg)
1 OA Straight duct Q0 4800 1.0 1,300 x 450 9.35 0.751 5.0 3.757 0.00 42.41 0.0 3.8 3.8 0.0148
2 Tee 0.37 42.41 15.7 15.7 19.4 0.0766
3 AF Straight duct Q5 2100 1.0 700 x 450 7.19 0.874 5.0 4.372 0.00 31.72 0.0 4.4 23.8 0.0938
4 FJ Straight duct Q8 1500 1.0 600 x 400 6.73 0.913 5.0 4.567 0.00 27.78 0.0 4.6 28.4 0.1118
5 Tee 0.37 27.78 10.3 10.3 38.7 0.1522
6 JK Straight duct Q11 1200 1.0 500 x 400 6.41 0.932 5.0 4.658 0.00 25.24 0.0 4.7 43.3 0.1706
7 KL Straight duct Q12 900 1.0 450 x 350 5.94 0.988 5.0 4.941 0.00 22.93 0.0 4.9 48.3 0.1900
8 LM Straight duct Q13 600 1.0 400 x 300 5.35 0.918 5.0 4.588 0.00 17.60 0.0 4.6 52.9 0.2081
9 MN Straight duct Q14 300 1.0 250 x 300 4.27 0.808 5.0 4.041 0.00 11.19 0.0 4.0 56.9 0.2240
10 Elbow 0.27 11.19 3.0 3.0 59.9 0.2359
11 NP Straight duct Q15 300 1.0 250 x 300 4.27 0.808 5.0 4.041 0.00 11.19 0.0 4.0 64.0 0.2518
Table 3.1 Static loss calculated result using equal friction duct design method.

All right reserved.
4.0 STATIC BALANCE DUCT DESIGN METHOD
The Static balance duct design method uses the duct network principle. For all
network problems, it satisfies the continuity and the work-energy principles
throughout the network. The continuity principle states that the vector summation of
air flow rate into any junction must be equal to zero. The continuity principle is
represented by the following equation:
Q = 0 eq. 4.1
The network-energy principle states that the vector summation of static loss
around any single loop of the network must be equal to zero. The vector summation of
static loss applies to any section of the duct within the loop. The static loss is additive
if air flow direction is parallel with the loop direction, but deductive if air flow
direction is opposite the loop direction. The network-energy is represented by the
following equation:
P = 0 eq. 4.2
Equation 4.2 can be further divided to two portions. The static loss through
straight duct and fittings is shown as follows:
P(straight duct ) + P ( fittings ) = 0

f eq. 4.3
From equation 3.2, it is known that the static loss is related to 4 factors, which
are the duct length, the friction factor, the duct size and the air flow rate. Thus, P is a
function of (L, f, de and Q).
Using the equal friction principle, the friction loss per unit of length is
constant. The friction factor, f, is a constant depending on the duct material. Giving
that the air flow rate, Q, the duct equivalent diameter, de can be calculated. Therefore,
it can be summarized that the friction loss, P, is determined by the air flow rate, Q.
As for all network problems, the solution of the static balance method is
obtained through a trial-and-correction or iteration process. There are several ways to

All right reserved.
solve these flow rates, the simplest and easiest to understand being the Hardy Cross
method.
The essence of the method is to start with an estimated set of initial values, Q0,
that fulfills the continuity at each junction. The difference between the estimated and
the updated value is represented by a correction factor, L. The updated value is the
summation of estimated value and the correction factor as shown below.
Qi = Q0 L eq. 4.4
where the sign () depends on the directions assumed for Q0.
In cases where one duct is depending on two loops, the new air flow rate
should include the summation of both correction factors from two loops.
Then, the next iteration is carried out with a new successive set of values.
Iterations are repeated until the iteration results are converged and satisfied.
From equation 4.3, the static loss equation is,
P(straight duct ) + P ( fittings ) = 0

f
where the sign () depends on the directions assumed for Q0.
The static loss through a straight duct is represented by equation (3.2), and the
static loss through fittings is represented by equation (3.5) and (3.6). In general, a
common equation as follows is obtained,
P = KQ n
=0 eq. 4.5
where K is the coefficient of static loss, which depends on the duct length, the duct
equivalent diameter and the friction factor.
Introducing eq. 4.4 into eq. 4.5, and obtain
P = K (Q
n
0 L ) = 0

All right reserved.
Expanding this equation by the binomial theorem and neglecting all terms
containing L raised to a higher power, because L is presumed to be small. For the
first iteration,
P = K (Q )
n n 1
0 nQ0 L + negligible = 0
Solving for L, the first correction factor becomes
KQ
n
0
L = eq. 4.6
nKQ
n 1
0
The absolute value must be used in the denominator to ensure that the proper
sign for L. This equation is used to compute the flow rate correction factor, L, for
each loop in the network. From equation 4.6, it can be further simplified as follows to
the satisfaction of usage,
L =
P eq. 4.7
n P Q 0
For iterative processes, the value of (1/n) is categorized as an over-relaxation

factor, which can be varied within certain limit to enhance the iteration process. In
this case, referring to eq. 3.2 and 3.5, due to the different value of n for straight duct
and fittings, the value of 2 for n is selected to proceed with the iterative process.
Hence, eq. 4.7 becomes
L =
P eq. 4.8
2 P Q 0
In every iterative process, the air flow rate must be updated with a successive
set of values computed until the values of Q converge with suitable accuracy to final
values.
Due to the limitation of discrete duct sizes, there will be residual where the
value of Q may not converge to zero, but alter within a small value for the same duct
sizes. In this case, the iteration is considered converged. The converged set value of Q
will be used to determine the static loss across the ducting system.

All right reserved.
4.1 Example for Static Balance Duct Design Method
Figure 4.1 shows a duct system which uses the static balance duct design
method. Figure 4.1 has the same layout as described in figure 3.1, with a duct looping
network. The friction loss is limited to 1 Pa/m. A set of initial air flow rate across
each duct section is estimated and tabulated in table 4.1 below. The air flow rate must
satisfy the continuity principle.
Item Point Designation Air flow rate (l/s)

1 OA Q0 4800
2 AB Q1 2700
3 BC Q2 2400
4 CD Q3 1350
5 DE Q4 1050
6 AF Q5 1800
7 CG Q6 750
8 EH Q7 750
9 FJ Q8 1200
10 GL Q9 150
11 HN Q10 150
12 JK Q11 900
13 KL Q12 600
14 LM Q13 450
15 MN Q14 150
Table 4.1 Initial estimated air flow rate across each section of duct.
The first iteration is carried out and the static loss calculation is tabulated. The
iteration for loop (I) is tabulated in table 4.2 and the iteration for loop (II) is shown in
table 4.3.
From eq. 4.8, the correction factor for loop I is,
L(I ) =
P
2 P Q 0
=
(4.4 + 4.9 + 13.8 + 4.1 + 3.1 + 2.3 19.9 4.7 4.7 9.3 4.7 4.6 6.5)
0.00165 + 0.00204 + 0.00574 + 0.00548 + 0.02049 + 0.01556 + 0.00414
2
+ 0.00262 + 0.00388 + 0.00778 + 0.00523 + 0.00765 + 0.01085

All right reserved.
=
( 21.8)
2(0.09311)
= 117 l / s
Similarly, the correction factor for loop II is,
L ( II ) =
P
2 P Q 0
=
(4.6 + 5.0 + 7.5 + 4.1 + 3.1 + 2.3 13.8 4.1 3.1 2.3 3.7 3.1 2.3)
0.00342 + 0.00479 + 0.00718 + 0.00548 + 0.02049 + 0.01556 + 0.00574
2
+ 0.00548 + 0.02049 + 0.01556 + 0.00828 + 0.02049 + 0.01556
=
( 5.8)
2(0.14852)
= 19 l / s

All right reserved.
Design Calc. Straight. Fitting Total

Air Air Static
Static Duct Size (mm) Static Duct hv Static Static
Item Point Description Flow Velocity Loss C P/Q
Loss WxH Loss / L Length (Pa) Loss Loss, P
(L/S) (m/s) (Pa)
(Pa/m) (Pa/m) (m) (Pa) (Pa)
First Iteration Loop I
1 AB Straight duct Q1 2700 1.0 850 x 450 7.71 0.889 5.0 4.445 0.00 36.48 0.0 4.4 0.00165
2 BC Straight duct Q2 2400 1.0 850 x 400 7.79 0.978 5.0 4.891 0.00 37.21 0.0 4.9 0.00204
3 C Tee 2400 0.37 37.21 13.8 13.8 0.00574
4 CG Straight duct Q6 750 1.0 500 x 300 5.41 0.822 5.0 4.112 0.00 17.99 0.0 4.1 0.00548
5 GL Straight duct Q9 150 1.0 250 x 200 3.21 0.615 5.0 3.073 0.00 6.31 0.0 3.1 0.02049
6 L Tee 150 0.37 6.31 2.3 2.3 0.01556
7 A Tee 4800 0.37 53.66 19.9 19.9 0.00414
8 AF Straight duct Q5 1800 1.0 600 x 450 7.14 0.944 5.0 4.722 0.00 31.28 0.0 4.7 0.00262
9 FJ Straight duct Q8 1200 1.0 500 x 400 6.41 0.932 5.0 4.658 0.00 25.24 0.0 4.7 0.00388
10 J Tee 1200 0.37 25.24 9.3 9.3 0.00778
11 JK Straight duct Q11 900 1.0 400 x 400 5.99 0.942 5.0 4.710 0.00 22.04 0.0 4.7 0.00523
12 KL Straight duct Q12 600 1.0 400 x 300 5.35 0.918 5.0 4.588 0.00 17.60 0.0 4.6 0.00765
13 L Tee 600 0.37 17.60 6.5 6.5 0.01085
Table 4.2 First iteration for loop I.

All right reserved.
Design Calc. Straight. Fitting Total

Air Duct Size Air Static
Static Static Duct hv Static Static
Item Point Description Flow (mm) Velocity Loss C P/Q
Loss Loss / L Length (Pa) Loss Loss, P
(L/S) WxH (m/s) (Pa)
(Pa/m) (Pa/m) (m) (Pa) (Pa)
First Iteration Loop II
14 CD Straight duct Q3 1350 1.0 550 x 400 6.58 0.923 5.0 4.614 0.00 26.567 0.0 4.6 0.00342
15 DE Straight duct Q4 1050 1.0 600 x 300 6.40 1.006 5.0 5.031 0.00 25.144 0.0 5.0 0.00479
16 E Wye 1050 0.30 25.144 7.5 7.5 0.00718
17 EH Straight duct Q7 750 1.0 500 x 300 5.41 0.822 5.0 4.112 0.00 17.988 0.0 4.1 0.00548
18 HN Straight duct Q10 150 1.0 250 x 200 3.21 0.615 5.0 3.073 0.00 6.309 0.0 3.1 0.02049
19 N Tee 150 0.37 6.309 2.3 2.3 0.01556
20 C Tee 2400 0.37 37.208 13.8 13.8 0.00574
23 L Tee 150 0.37 6.309 2.3 2.3 0.01556
24 LM Straight duct Q13 450 1.0 350 x 300 4.57 0.745 5.0 3.726 0.00 12.834 0.0 3.7 0.00828
25 MN Straight duct Q14 150 1.0 250 x 200 3.21 0.615 5.0 3.073 0.00 6.309 0.0 3.1 0.02049
26 N Tee 150 0.37 6.309 2.3 2.3 0.01556
Table 4.3 First iteration for loop II.

All right reserved.
From the two correction factors obtained above, the estimated flow rate is
updated and tabulated in table 4.4.
Initial Air Correction Updated Air

Item Point Designation flow rate (l/s) flow rate (l/s)
1 OA Q0 4800 Q0 4800
2 AB Q1 2700 Q1 = Q1 +L(I) 2817
3 BC Q2 2400 Q2 = Q2 +L(I) 2517
4 CD Q3 1350 Q3 = Q3 +L(II) 1369
5 DE Q4 1050 Q4 = Q4 +L(II) 1069
6 AF Q5 1800 Q5 = Q5 - L(I) 1683
7 CG Q6 750 Q6 = Q6 +L(I) - L(II) 848
8 EH Q7 750 Q7 = Q7 +L(II) 769
9 FJ Q8 1200 Q8 = Q8 - L(I) 1083
10 GL Q9 150 Q9 = Q9 +L(I) - L(II) 248
11 HN Q10 150 Q10 = Q10 +L(II) 169
12 JK Q11 900 Q11 = Q11 - L(I) 783
13 KL Q12 600 Q12 = Q12 - L(I) 483
14 LM Q13 450 Q13 = Q13 - L(II) 431
15 MN Q14 150 Q14 = Q14 - L(II) 131
Table 4.4 Updated estimated air flow rate after first iteration.
The iteration is continued and the correction factor is tabulated in table 4.5.
The iteration is converged and the duct sizes are maintained from iteration of Ninth
onwards. The converged value of Q is tabulated in table 4.6. The duct design is shown
in figure 4.2.
Item Iteration Correction factor Loop I, Correction factor Loop II,

Number L(I) (l/s) L(II) (l/s)
1 First 117 19
2 Second 90 15
3 Third 63 33
4 Forth 77 26
5 Fifth 42 23
6 Sixth 42 21
7 Seventh 50 13
8 Eighth 29 5
9 Ninth 23 1
Table 4.5 Correction factors obtained from iterations.

All right reserved.
At the eighth iteration, it is found that the air flow rate direction for duct
section MN, Q14, is changed, from M->N to N->M. This is due to the accumulated
static loss from O to N is lower than from O to M. The air flow rate across the duct
section MN is very low, showing that the pressure at point M and N is almost balance
or the air flow is almost stagnant.
From the static balance duct design method, it is discovered that the highest
static loss is from O to Q. This static loss shall be overcome by the supply fan. An
interesting phenomenon is found that the static loss from O to Q is almost the same
regardless of the paths of air flow, either through A-J, C-L or E-N. This complies with
the work-energy principle. The static loss calculation is tabulated in table 4.7. The
minor variation of static loss is due to the residual air in discrete duct sizes. The
variation can be reduced with more iterations. The average accumulated static loss
from O to Q is 56 Pa.
Item Point Designation Air flow rate (l/s) Duct Size, W x H (mm)
1 OA Q0 4800
2 AB Q1 3234 950 x 450
3 BC Q2 2934 900 x 450
4 CD Q3 1507 600 x 400
5 DE Q4 1207 600 x 350
6 AF Q5 1266 450 x 450
7 CG Q6 1127 650 x 300
8 EH Q7 907 550 x 300
9 FJ Q8 666 400 x 350
10 GL Q9 527 350 x 300
11 HN Q10 307 250 x 300
12 JK Q11 366 300 x 300
13 KL Q12 66 150 x 150
14 LM Q13 293 250 x 300
15 MN Q14 7 100 x 50
Table 4.6 Converged air flow rate across each section of duct.
The air flow rate through duct section KL and MN is small. For equal friction
method, these sections can be neglected and omitted. However, they have advantages
for the static balance duct design method. This will be discussed more in chapter 6.

All right reserved.
Design Straight Fitting Total Static

Static Duct Size (mm) Duct hv Static Static Loss
Loss WxH Length (Pa) Loss Loss (in.
(L/S) (m/s) (Pa) (Pa)
(Pa/m) (m) (Pa) (Pa) wg)
Static Loss through path E-N

1 OA Straight duct Q0 4800 1.0 1,300 x 450 9.35 5.0 5.000 0.00 53.66 0.0 5.0 5.0 0.0197
4 CD Straight duct Q3 1507 1.0 600 x 400 6.76 5.0 4.606 0.00 28.04 0.0 4.6 19.0 0.0747
5 DE Straight duct Q4 1207 1.0 600 x 350 6.23 5.0 4.335 0.00 23.86 0.0 4.3 23.3 0.0918
6 Wye 0.30 23.86 7.2 7.2 30.5 0.1199
7 EH Straight duct Q7 907 1.0 550 x 300 5.99 5.0 4.683 0.00 22.03 0.0 4.7 35.1 0.1384
8 HN Straight duct Q9 307 1.0 250 x 300 4.37 5.0 4.214 0.00 11.72 0.0 4.2 39.4 0.1550
9 Tee 0.37 11.72 4.3 4.3 43.7 0.1721
10 NM Straight duct Q14 7 1.0 100 x 50 1.54 5.0 3.334 0.00 1.45 0.0 3.3 47.0 0.1852
11 Tee 0.37 1.45 0.5 0.5 47.6 0.1873
12 MQ Straight duct Q16 300 1.0 250 x 300 4.27 5.0 4.041 0.00 11.19 0.0 4.0 51.6 0.2032
Static Loss through path A-J

1 OA Straight duct Q0 4800 1.0 1,300 x 450 9.35 5.0 5.000 0.00 53.66 0.0 5.0 5.0 0.0197
2 Tee 0.37 53.66 19.9 19.9 24.9 0.0978
3 AF Straight duct Q5 1266 1.0 450 x 450 6.66 5.0 4.945 0.00 27.23 0.0 4.9 29.8 0.1173
4 FJ Straight duct Q8 666 1.0 400 x 350 5.07 5.0 3.777 0.00 15.80 0.0 3.8 33.6 0.1322
5 Tee 0.37 15.80 5.8 5.8 39.4 0.1552
6 JK Straight duct Q11 366 1.0 300 x 300 4.33 5.0 3.707 0.00 11.52 0.0 3.7 43.1 0.1698
7 KL Straight duct Q12 66 1.0 150 x 150 3.13 5.0 4.765 0.00 5.99 0.0 4.8 47.9 0.1886
9 Tee 0.37 10.68 4.0 4.0 55.7 0.2194

All right reserved.
Design Straight Fitting Total Static

Static Duct Size (mm) Duct hv Static Static Loss
Loss WxH Length (Pa) Loss Loss (in.
(L/S) (m/s) (Pa) (Pa)
(Pa/m) (m) (Pa) (Pa) wg)
Static Loss through path C-L

1 OA Straight duct Q0 4800 1.0 450 x 1,300 9.35 5.0 5.000 0.00 53.66 0.0 5.0 5.0 0.0197
4 Tee 0.37 38.78 14.3 14.3 28.7 0.1131
7 Tee 0.370 17.60 6.5 6.5 44.2 0.1740
9 Tee 0.37 10.68 4.0 4.0 52.0 0.2048
Table 4.7 Static loss calculated result using static balance duct design method from point O to Q.

All right reserved.
5.0 COMPARISON BETWEEN THE STATIC BALANCE AND THE EQUAL

FRICTION DUCT DESIGN METHOD
Chapter 3.1 and 4.1 show two examples of the duct design method for the same
layout. The static balance duct design method uses the equal friction principle to develop
the duct network.
Table 5.1 shows a comparison of the total static loss for the two methods. The
static loss across duct work for the equal friction method is 64 Pa. This represents the
external static pressure that a supply fan needs to overcome. However, the static balance
method is 56 Pa, indicating that the friction loss in the equal friction duct method is 12.5%
higher than the static balance method. The total static loss inclusive of equipment and
terminal pressure for the equal friction method is approximately 1.7% higher than the
static balance method. The reduction of static loss for static balance method may be
significant for a large duct network system.
Equal Friction Static balance

Item Description
method, (Pa) method, (Pa)
1 Air Handling Unit 380 380
2 Duct friction 64 55
3 Terminal pressure 35 35
Total 479 470
Difference on friction across duct. (%) 12.5

Difference on total static loss. (%) 1.7
Table 5.1 comparison on the total static loss for two duct design method.

All right reserved.
Flow Duct size Surface

Item Section Q rate (mm) Length Qty area Gauge Weight
(l/s) W x H (m) (m2) (U.S.) (kg)
1 OA Q0 4800 1300 x 450 5 1 17.5 22 120.40
2 AB Q1 2400 750 x 450 5 1 12.0 22 82.56
3 BC Q2 2100 750 x 400 5 1 11.5 24 65.05
4 CD Q3 1200 500 x 400 5 1 9.0 26 39.90
5 DE Q4 900 450 x 350 5 1 8.0 26 35.47
6 AF Q5 2100 700 x 450 5 1 11.5 24 65.05
7 CG Q6 600 400 x 300 5 1 7.0 26 31.03
8 EH Q7 600 400 x 300 5 1 7.0 26 31.03
9 FJ Q8 1500 600 x 400 5 1 10.0 26 44.33
10 JK Q11 1200 500 x 400 5 1 9.0 26 39.90
11 KL Q12 900 450 x 350 5 1 8.0 26 35.47
12 LM Q13 600 400 x 300 5 1 7.0 26 31.03
13 MN Q14 300 250 x 300 5 1 5.5 28 21.02
14 NP Q15 300 250 x 300 5 16 88.0 28 336.30
Total = 978.53
15% scrap = 146.78
Total weight = 1125.31
Table 5.2 Duct size and weight for equal friction duct design method.
Flow Duct size Surface

Item Section Q rate (mm) Length Qty area Gauge Weight
(l/s) W x H m m2 (U.S.) (kg)
1 OA Q0 4800 1300 x 450 5 1 17.5 22 120.40
2 AB Q1 3234 950 x 450 5 1 14.0 22 96.32
3 BC Q2 2934 900 x 450 5 1 13.5 22 92.88
4 CD Q3 1507 600 x 400 5 1 10.0 26 44.33
5 DE Q4 1207 600 x 350 5 1 9.5 26 42.12
6 AF Q5 1266 450 x 450 5 1 9.0 26 39.90
7 CG Q6 1127 650 x 300 5 1 9.5 24 53.74
8 EH Q7 907 550 x 300 5 1 8.5 26 37.68
9 FJ Q8 666 400 x 350 5 1 7.5 26 33.25
10 GL Q9 527 350 x 300 5 1 6.5 26 28.82
11 HN Q10 307 250 x 300 5 1 5.5 28 21.02
12 JK Q11 366 300 x 300 5 1 6.0 26 26.60
13 KL Q12 66 150 x 150 5 1 3.0 28 11.46
14 LM Q13 293 250 x 300 5 1 5.5 28 21.02
15 MN Q14 7 100 x 50 5 1 1.5 28 5.73
16 NP Q15 300 250 x 300 5 16 88.0 28 336.30
Total = 1011.56
15% scrap = 151.73
Total weight = 1163.29
Table 5.3 Duct sizes and weight for static balance duct design method.

All right reserved.
Table 5.2 and 5.3 show the duct sizes and weights established by the two methods
respectively. The weight of sheet metal required for the system design by the static
balance method is approximately 3.4% higher than the equal friction method. However,
the minimal increase of cost is offset by the long-term operating cost.
5.1 Alternative Equal Friction Duct Design Method
From the static balance method, it is found that the duct orientation for equal
friction can be changed to achieve lower static loss. The alternative duct design is shown
in figure 5.1. The highest static loss is from point O to Q, which is 56 Pa. It has the same
static loss obtained for the static balance method.
This result is acceptable because the static balance method is developed based on
the equal friction principle. Furthermore, this system is almost symmetrical, and therefore,
the static variation is not significant. For a more complex system, the static balance
method always has the lowest static loss.
5.2 Site Coordination
In general, the equal friction method is always the most popular among the 3
conventional duct design methods. This is because the equal friction method is the
simplest and fastest way to design, easy to change or modify to suit any site modification.
The static balance method also uses equal friction principle in developing the duct network.
Therefore, it possesses the same advantageous characteristics of the equal friction method
for site modifications.
In addition, the static balance method offers more advantages. Referring to figures
3.2, for example, if the duct size at section F-J is modified to avoid obstruction, any
changes on the duct size will increase the total static loss, which shall be overcome by the
supply fan. The increase of the static loss may cause an insufficient air flow from point O
to P and require a higher fan static.
Referring to figure 4.2, if the static balance method is applied, with the same
modification on section F-J, the air will achieve self-balancing so that more air will flow

All right reserved.
through section C-L and E-N to achieve static balance phenomenon. The increase of static
loss is one-third of the equal friction method. Hence, the disturbance may not be
significant and the increase of fan size may not be required.
5.3 Testing and Commissioning
The static balance method is easier to balance as compared to the equal friction
method. The Equal friction method requires more commissioning time in the air balancing
at branches, due to the air flow is limited within the same length of duct. For the static
balance method, the air flow is self-balance within the duct network and the static
variation by minor disturbances is not significant.
6.0 THE STATIC BALANCE FOR VARIABLE AIR VOLUME (VAV) SYSTEM
The Static balance duct design method offers many advantages and well applicable
for the VAV system. For any partial loading of the VAV system, the air flow rate will self-
balance to achieve the lowest static loss across the duct network. Therefore, it enhances
energy saving on the fan operating cost. Furthermore, the response time of pressure
variation for VAV system is much faster compared to the conventional system due to the
shorter duct length.
6.1 The Equal Friction Method for VAV system
For a VAV system, the supply fan speed is controlled by a variable speed drive
(VSD), corresponding to a pressure sensor located in the duct. Referring to figure 3.2, for
example, the pressure sensor is located between sections L-M. If a VAV terminal unit
located at H is shut off, the pressure sensor will sense the variation and feedback to the
supply fan in reducing the speed. However, the static loss that is required to be overcome
by the supply fan remains unchanged because the air supply from point O to P is
unchanged. The fan reduces air flow rate and maintain the static.
Furthermore, the response time of pressure variation from point H to point L is

long because of the long duct works through path H-E-D-C-B-A-F-J-K-L.

All right reserved.
6.2 The Static Balance Method for VAV System
A Similar case of the equal friction method for VAV system is applied to the static
balance method. Referring to figure 4.2, the pressure sensor is located at L-M. If the VAV
terminal unit located at H is shut off, the pressure sensor will sense the variation and
feedback to the supply fan in reducing the speed. In this case, the air flow within the duct
network will perform self-balancing to reduce the total overall static loss. The air flow
within each section of duct of the network is reduced. It reduces the overall static loss
from point O to Q and the energy consumption.
In addition, lower air flow through bigger duct size reduces the friction factor per
unit of length. As a result, static balance method further reduces the static that required to
be overcome by the supply fan. It further reduces the fan speed and enhances energy
saving. In static balance method, the fan reduces the air flow and the static as well.
The pressure variation response time of the pressure sensor from point H to point L
is short through path H-N-M-L.

All right reserved.
CONCLUSION
The static balance is a novel duct design method which has advantages over
conventional duct design methods. The static balance is a duct network system that
implements the continuity and work-energy principles throughout the network.
The static balance method is an intelligent self-balance method by achieving

minimum static losses across the ducting network. Although the initial cost for the static
balance method is higher than the equal friction method, it is offset by the long term
operating cost. The static balance method also minimizes the increase of static losses,
which causes by site modifications, within the duct network. The commissioning of the
static balance is easier and faster than the equal friction method.
Furthermore, the static balance method is well applicable to the variable air volume
(VAV) system. It enhances the functionality of VAV system. It reduces the system
response time. Due to its intelligent self-static balance characteristic, it further reduces the
overall static losses within the duct network system and achieves higher energy saving.
REFERENCES
1. Carrier, Handbook of Air Conditioning System Design. McGraw-Hill, New York.
2. SMACNA, HVAC Duct Construction Standards. 1985. SMACNA, USA
3. R.L. Street, Elementary Fluid Mechanicals. 1996. (7th Ed.) John Wiley & Sons, New
York.

All right reserved.

Static Balance PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Static Balance PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

STATIC BALANCE DUCT SIZING

STATIC BALANCE DUCT DESIGN METHOD

Copyright 2008 by Kok-Haw Kong Page 2 of 24

2.0 DUCT DESIGN METHOD

The conventional duct design method includes:

Copyright 2008 by Kok-Haw Kong Page 3 of 24

3.0 EQUAL FRICTION DUCT DESIGN METHOD

The relationship of these factors is represented by the following equation:

Copyright 2008 by Kok-Haw Kong Page 4 of 24

The static loss through fittings is represented by the following equation:

where Pf = static loss through fittings, (Pa)

Copyright 2008 by Kok-Haw Kong Page 5 of 24

3.1 Example for Equal Friction Duct Design Method

From calculation, the accumulated static loss is 64 Pa from point O to P.

Copyright 2008 by Kok-Haw Kong Page 6 of 24

Design Calc. Straight Fitting Total Static

Copyright 2008 by Kok-Haw Kong Page 7 of 24

4.0 STATIC BALANCE DUCT DESIGN METHOD

P(straight duct ) + P ( fittings ) = 0

Copyright 2008 by Kok-Haw Kong Page 8 of 24

From equation 4.3, the static loss equation is,

P(straight duct ) + P ( fittings ) = 0

where the sign () depends on the directions assumed for Q0.

Introducing eq. 4.4 into eq. 4.5, and obtain

Copyright 2008 by Kok-Haw Kong Page 9 of 24

Solving for L, the first correction factor becomes

For iterative processes, the value of (1/n) is categorized as an over-relaxation

Copyright 2008 by Kok-Haw Kong Page 10 of 24

4.1 Example for Static Balance Duct Design Method

Item Point Designation Air flow rate (l/s)

From eq. 4.8, the correction factor for loop I is,

Copyright 2008 by Kok-Haw Kong Page 11 of 24

Similarly, the correction factor for loop II is,

Copyright 2008 by Kok-Haw Kong Page 12 of 24

Design Calc. Straight. Fitting Total

Table 4.2 First iteration for loop I.

Copyright 2008 by Kok-Haw Kong Page 13 of 24

Design Calc. Straight. Fitting Total

Table 4.3 First iteration for loop II.

Copyright 2008 by Kok-Haw Kong Page 14 of 24

Initial Air Correction Updated Air

Item Iteration Correction factor Loop I, Correction factor Loop II,

Table 4.5 Correction factors obtained from iterations.

Copyright 2008 by Kok-Haw Kong Page 16 of 24

Design Straight Fitting Total Static

Static Loss through path E-N

Static Loss through path A-J

Copyright 2008 by Kok-Haw Kong Page 17 of 24

Design Straight Fitting Total Static

Static Loss through path C-L

Copyright 2008 by Kok-Haw Kong Page 18 of 24

5.0 COMPARISON BETWEEN THE STATIC BALANCE AND THE EQUAL

Equal Friction Static balance

Difference on friction across duct. (%) 12.5

Copyright 2008 by Kok-Haw Kong Page 19 of 24

Flow Duct size Surface

Flow Duct size Surface

Copyright 2008 by Kok-Haw Kong Page 20 of 24

5.1 Alternative Equal Friction Duct Design Method

5.2 Site Coordination

Copyright 2008 by Kok-Haw Kong Page 21 of 24

5.3 Testing and Commissioning

6.1 The Equal Friction Method for VAV system