0

3-amazon
6-gmail
5-twitter
7-dropbox
8-facebook
a-coursera
b-scribd
c-codecademy|codemarshal
e-enscholar
h-hoverwatch
i-oginsta+
m-soundcloud
p-physicsforum
r-rokomari
s-champs21, socratic,stackexchange
v-virtual rlc
w-wikipedia
y-yesmovies ArnabZ (2)
7c-7cups
st-steam
sh-sarahah

DJXpop.com
www.bursamp3.wapka.me

G+Photos https://goo.gl/photos/SqhYn4FoKwX1Z3yb9
moving the album changes it.
3788

Ultimately we're trying to prove something that is, in a way, quite obvious: that
the rate of change in the area under a curve is given by the value of the curve.
When the curve is at y = 3, for example, the area under the curve is expanding at a
rate of 3. Makes sense, right?

1. We know the entangled particles must have undefined spins before we measure them
because if they didn't they would sometimes give the same spin when measured in a
direction perpendicular to their well-defined spins (and they never do).

2. We know the entangled particles can't have hidden information all along about
which spin they will give in different directions because if they did we would
measure different results at the two detectors >5/9ths of the time and we don't -
we only get different results 50% of the time.

3. We can't use this behaviour to communicate faster than light because we can only
pick the direction to measure in, we can't force the spin to be up or down - and it
will be random with 50/50 probability. When the two detectors pick the same
direction to measure in the results at one detector will be random but the opposite
random of those measured at the other detector, which is a bit spooky.?

DIVISIBILITY RULES

A divisibility rule is a shorthand way of determining whether a given number is

divisible by a fixed divisor without performing the division.
1. A number is divisible by 2 if the last digit is even (0,2,4,6,8)

2. A number is divisible by 3 if the sum of the digits is divisible by 3. Example:

168 is divisible by 3 as 1+6+8=15 is divisible by 3.
3. A number is divisible by 4 if the last 2 digits are divisible by 4.
Example: 916 divisible by 4 as 16 divisible by 4

4. A number is divisible by 5 if the last digit of number is either 0 or 5.

5. A number is divisible by 6 if number is divisible by both 2 and 3.

6. If you double the last digit of a number A and subtract it from the rest of the
number A and the answer is: 0 or divisible by 7, then the number A is divisible by
7.

Example: 672 (2*2 is 4, 67-4=63, and 637=9) So 672 is divisible by 7

7. A number is divisible by 8 if last three digits are divisible by 8.

8. A number is divisible by 9 if the sum of the digits is divisible by 9

9. A number is divisible by 10 if last digit of number is 0.

10. (Divisibility rule of 11) If you sum every second digit of a number n and then
subtract all other digits of the number n and the answer is: 0 or divisible by 11,
then the number n is divisible by 11.
Example: using 1364
(3+4) - (1+6) = 0
So 1364 is divisible by 11.

11. A number is divisible by 12 if the number is divisible by both 3 and 4

12. (Divisibility rule of 13)Add four times the last digit to the remaining leading
truncated number. If the result is divisible by 13, then so was the first number.
Apply this rule over and over again as necessary.
Example: 50661-->5066+4=5070-->507+0=507-->50+28=78 and 78 is 6*13, so 50661 is
divisible by 13.

13. (Divisibility rule of 17)Subtract five times the last digit from the remaining
leading truncated number. If the result is divisible by 17, then so was the first
number. Apply this rule over and over again as necessary.
Example: 3978-->397-5*8=357-->35-5*7=0. So 3978 is divisible by 17.

14. (Divisibility rule of 19) Add two times the last digit to the remaining leading
truncated number. If the result is divisible by 19, then so was the first number.
Apply this rule over and over again as necessary.
Example: 101156-->10115+2*6=10127-->1012+2*7=1026-->102+2*6=114 and 114=6*19, so
101156 is divisible by 19.

Neblina Sikta.
Mathematics and Informatics Intern.

Astronomy Olympiad | Sample Problem Solution.

In the figure, D is the point of second reflection. OD will be normal to the

surface at D.
?OBD = 90
? AO = OD
Let,
?BDO = ?ADO = ?DAO = x
? ?AOD = 180 - (?ADO + ?DAO)
= 180 - 2x
But, ?AOD = ?OBD + ?BDO
180 - 2x = 90 + x
? x = 30
OB = OD * sin 30 = R/2 (Ans.)

1. Glycolysis (occurs in cytoplasm)

(Glucose + 2 ADP + 2 Pi + 2 NAD --> 2 Pyruvate + 2 ATP + 2 NADH + heat)

2. Acetyl co-A formation

(2 Pyruvate + 2 NAD + 2CoA --> 2 Acetyl CoA + 2 CO2 + 2 NADH + heat)

Note.. The 2 carbons from pyruvate make up the acetyl part of acetylCoA. CoA is a
big molecule that acts just as a carrier.)

3. Krebs Cycle

(2 AcetylCoA + 6 NAD + 2 FAD + 2 ADP + 2Pi -->

4 CO2 + 6 NADH + 2 FADH2 + 2 ATP + 2 CoA + heat)

4. ETC

( 10 NADH + 2 FADH2 + 34 ADP + 34 Pi + 6 O2-->

34 ATP + 10 NAD + 2 FAD + heat)

(Using conversion factor: 3 ATP/NADH and 2 ATP /FADH2)

Total ATP production is 38 ATP per glucose.

Note 1:
Some books state 36 ATP per glucose but this occurs in cells that convert the 2
NADHs made in glycolysis into 2 FADH2s when they enter the mitochondria where Krebs
cycle and ETC occur. (It is a transporter phenomenon and has nothing to do with
using ATP.) If you do the math, you end up with 2 less ATP.

This approach has worked well for over 30 years.

Note2: The NADs and FADs produced in ETC go back to glycolysis, pyruvate
processing or the Krebs Cycle for use as inputs.

Note3: Why do I talk about pyruvate processing?

Because in Fermentation pyruvate is processed to either 2) lactate or 3) ethanol

rather than 1) acetyl-CoA. So there are three types of Pyruvate Processing.

Also pyruvate can be produced from other pathways such as fatty acid beta oxidation
which can then be converted to acetyl-CoA and fed into the Krebs cycle.

Note 4: Pyruvate vs Pyruvic acid?

Pyruvic acid has an one more hydrogen than pyruvate

Acids are H donors so

Pyruvic acid ---> H+ + pyruvate
So pyruvic acid and pyruvate are not really the same thing.

Note 5: Cristae are the ridges in the inner mitochondrial membrane, not THE inner
mitochondrial membrane. Cristae increase the total surface area of the inner
mitochondrial membrane which allows for more ETC systems per mitochondrion. Inside
the inner membrane are protein complexes used by the ETC to pump NADH/FADH2 protons
into the intermembrane space between the inner and outer mitochondrial membranes.
Also in the inner membrane are the systems (ATP Synthase) used to put P on ADP to
make ATP inside the inner membrane due to the passage of protons that were pumped
out by the ETC.

The ETC basically creates a battery where there are more protons on the outside
than inside of inner membrane. So protons diffuse back to matrix due to proton
concentration gradient and relatively negative matrix. So this is an
electrochemical gradient driving ATP synthesis.

CTG-B-10017

a) If we disregard the splits initially, there are m! ways to order the Martians
and n! ways to order the Earthlings. Finally, we need to see where the Martians are
placed. As each Martian needs to be placed either on an end or between two
Earthlings, there are n+1 locations that they can sit (one to the left of every
Earthling, and then one more at the far right). As there are m Martians, that means
that there are ((n+1),(m)) = ((n+1)!)/(m!(n+1-m)!) possible ways to place them.
Thus the total possible seating arrangements is
n!m!((n+1)!)/(m!(n+1-m)!) = (n!(n+1)!)/((n-m+1)!)
1
b) This problem is similar to the above. To make things simpler, let's pick an
Earthling and call him the president. Because it does not matter how a circle is
rotated, instead of referring to seating arrangements based on an absolute
ordering, we will consider seating arrangements based on their relation to the
president.
Just as above, if we start from the president and continue clockwise around the
circle, we can count the number of ways of ordering the remaining attendees. As
there are m Martians and n-1 remaining Earthlings, there are m! ways to order the
Martians and (n-1)! ways to order the remaining Earthlings.
Helpful 0 Confusing 0
Next, we once again need to position the Martians. This time we don't have an
additional spot at the end, thus there are only n locations they can sit. Then
there are ((n),(m))=(n!)/(m!(n-m)!) ways to place them. Thus the total possible
seating arrangements is
(n-1)!m!(n!)/(m!(n-m)!)=(n!(n-1)!)/((n-m)!)