Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The End For Indonesia's Lowland Forests
The End For Indonesia's Lowland Forests
Author(s): Paul Jepson, James K. Jarvie, Kathy MacKinnon and Kathryn A. Monk
Source: Science, New Series, Vol. 292, No. 5518 (May 4, 2001), pp. 859+861
Published by: American Association for the Advancement of Science
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3083582
Accessed: 20-06-2017 04:20 UTC
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted
digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about
JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
http://about.jstor.org/terms
American Association for the Advancement of Science is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize,
preserve and extend access to Science
This content downloaded from 152.118.24.10 on Tue, 20 Jun 2017 04:20:41 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
0 s2s-
project, financed by a World Bank loan and
ESSAYS ON SCIENCE AND SOCIETY a grant from the Global Environment Facili-
ty (GEF), aimed to establish integrated con-
Middle East, and Indonesia. She is now director-gener- ty-rich lowland habitats excised from pro- payments of up to US$230,000 should
al of the Iwokrama Rainforest Project in Guyana. posed park boundaries after 1982. A major they renege on the deal.
This content downloaded from 152.118.24.10 on Tue, 20 Jun 2017 04:20:41 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
SCIENCE'S COMPASS
Communities have two reasons to sur- that led to deaths, destroyed roads and rice A concerted media campaign to pro-
render their quasi-legal rights. First, imme- crops, and caused local food shortages. mote public debate and mobilize civil soci-
diate cash benefits far exceed anything ac- An export ban on Indonesian timber will ety must be an integral part of any action
quired during past political eras. Second, gain little national or local support and is to control illegal logging. Public, political,
they fear retribution from illegal logging probably unenforceable. Foreign pressure for and donor attitudes must change to favor
networks. Participation in illegal logging is such a ban carries the risk of a nationalist the following: prosecuting all those in-
more lucrative in the short term than any backlash that would exacerbate the situation volved in illegal logging, including top of-
benefits offered by concessionaires, con- further. It would kill the few Indonesian and ficials; state-enforced protection of ecosys-
servation initiatives, or sustainable forestry international initiatives that have the poten- tems that are critically important for con-
projects supported by donor agencies. tial to foster sustainable forest management. servation of national and global biodiversi-
Although contradicting state norms, ille- In the short term, enforcement of national ty; independent third-party monitoring of
gal logging is becoming semi-legal and law is critical. A recent report by the Indone- forestry practice and public exposure of
rapidly established as the de facto institution- wrongdoing; increasing awareness of the
al arrangement governing Indonesia's forests. watershed and environmental values of
The state is unable, or unwilling, to address forests; and capturing the long-term bene-
this illegal activity. In August 2000, after in- fits that can accrue if forests are managed
temational publicity about illegal logging in under an "ethical consumerism" umbrella.
Tanjung Puting National Park,"1 the Minister For the long term, the most promising
7~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
of Forestry wrote to the relevant provincial approach for sustainable forest management
authorities asking for ac- is to foster initiatives that encourage joint
tion against the main of- management between concessionaires, com-
fender, a well-known munities, and district government. Already,
member of Indonesia's a growing minority of logging concessions
People's Assembly. The are embracing intemational and lo-
request was ignored. In cal timber "green" certification
three case-study areas, mechanisms as an altemative forest
Kerinci-Seblat and Gu- govemance mechanism that can se-
nung Leuser national cure local buy-in and better practice.
parks (Sumatra) and Ma- A change from large-scale, compa-
linau district (Kaliman- ny-based exploitation to lower-im-
tan), illegal operations appear to lead to one pact joint ventures will require a
or two known principal backers, residing in complete rethinking of forest prof-
regional centers. itability and beneficiaries.
District bureaucracies are generally un- The illegal logging in Indonesia
aware and uncaring of biodiversity issues | m--~~~~~~~~~~~~0-0- has global relevance but no simple
and have limited capacity to govern. Local solution. The scientific community,
Illegal logging operations. (Top) A newly built logging
governing elites rarely consider the environ- the conservation movement, indus-
road crosses the boundary into Kerinci national park.
mental costs of rampant forest exploitation try, and the Indonesian and donor
(Middle) Illegal timber being hauled out of Kerinci na-
or believe that environmental damage can tional park. (Bottom) Log piles build up in the log yards
governments must move from appar-
be rectified with technical solutions, fi- of the Duta Madju concession, known to have illegally ent complacency to vigorous action
nanced by increased district prosperity or transgressed the Kerinci N.P. boundary and extracted at local levels. This is a time to unite
grants from the central government and in- timber from the park. Now concessionaires are working to combat this unprecedented forest
ternational donors. In essence, they are furiously to remove timber from their concessions be- loss, with its predictably dire conse-
replicating the resource management modelfore the illegal gangs get to it first. quences for local communities,
of the Suharto regime at the local level. livelihoods, and biodiversity. In the
Indonesia's government and the interna-sian Directorate of Nature Conservation con- face of this global emergency, we must move
tional community face some hard choices ifcluded that local police capacity was insuffi- from empty rhetoric and debate on biodiver-
cient to address the scale and power of illegal
they wish to stem this biological catastrophe. sity and climate change to positive action to
To wait until the political climate settles logging networks and that military action protect Indonesia's forests.
may be necessary to protect national parks.
would be disastrous for biodiversity and forest
tD. Holmes, Deforestation In Indonesia: A Review of
management. Given current trends, we esti-Emergency action must be taken to enforce
the Situation in Sumatra, Kalimantan, and Sulawesi
mate that Kerinci's lowland forests, some ofclosure of illegal sawmills and stop illegal (World Bank, Jakarta, 2000).
logging operations. Where concessionaires
the richest habitats on Earth, will be destroyed *Down to Earth, Newsletter No. 46, Special Issue on
within 3 years. Illegal logging will vastly in-have lost control over their own concession Regional Autonomy, available from www.gn.apc.org/
dte [accessed 9 September 2000].
crease the risk and impacts of fire during the areas, all operations should be suspended, es-
?J. F. McCarthy, "Wild logging": The rise and fall of
next El Nifio event. A combination of forestpecially the building of new logging roads logging networks and biodiversity conservation pro-
degradation and land clearance were the rootthat open up new areas of the forest frontier jects on Sumatra's rainforest frontier [Occasional Pa-
causes of the 1998-99 fire disaster that blan-to exploitation. Priority actions should target per No. 31, Center for International Forestry Research
(CIFOR), Bogor Barat, Indonesia], available at
keted nearly 20 million people across South-the ecosystems of Leuser and Kerinci (Suma-
www.cifor.cgiar.org.
5 east Asia in smoke for months, with disas- tra) and Tanjung Puting and Gunung Palung
IIEIA/Telapak, The Final Cut. Illegal Logging in Indone-
cL
0 trous costs to local health and economies.T Al-(Kalimantan), where vast losses of irreplace- sia's Orang Utan Parks and Illegal Logging in Tanjung
0
lowing the indiscriminate logging to continue able and globally important biodiversity are Puting National Park-An Update on The Final Cut
CL
will result in long-term damage to watershed imminent. Such action would send a clear
and Telapak Indonesia, Bogor, 1999 and 2000).
forests. In October 2000, districts around Ker-message to districts that decentralized gov-
11C. V. Barber, J. Schweithelm, Trial by Fire (World Re-
inci National Park suffered major flooding ernment also means responsible government. sources Institute, Washington, DC, 2000).
This content downloaded from 152.118.24.10 on Tue, 20 Jun 2017 04:20:41 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms