Process Engineering | Properly protect centrifugal pumps | Chemical Processing Page 1

Properly protect centrifugal pumps

By Andrew Sloley, contributing editor

ChemicalProcessing.com
Consider various factors when selecting how to guard against low flow, Andrew Sloley says
in this month's Plant Insites column.

Low flow can cause overheating, hydraulic instabilities (suction and discharge recirculation)
and mechanical unreliability in centrifugal pumps. To prevent such problems, options
include both continuous and automatic (active) low-flow protection systems. Figure 1
shows four major types of configurations that provide recirculation back to an upstream
feed vessel. Alternatives include recirculation to the pump suction piping.

A continuous system is frequently chosen because of its simplicity. It uses a restriction

orifice in a return line. This orifice is typically sized in one of two ways. The more
conservative approach selects an orifice for the full minimum flow required. The less
conservative one sizes the restriction orifice for a rate that, when added to the minimum
expected process flow, gives the minimum flow the pump requires.

Because it operates at all times and the pump needs to have a higher capacity than the
process alone requires, a continuous system may impose substantial pump and energy
costs. Moreover, its difficult to put into place when the minimum flow is a large fraction of
the pumps best-efficiency-point operation. In these situations, recirculation rates and
energy costs are high.

Figure 1. Four common options involve recirculation to an upstream feed vessel.

http://www.chemicalprocessing.com/articles/2007/109.html 08/01/2007 08:35:46 AM

Process Engineering | Properly protect centrifugal pumps | Chemical Processing Page 2

Automatic systems get around this problem. Active flow control systems can use either
modulated flow or on/off flow through a control valve. For high-head pumps, a control
valve may be placed in series with one or more orifices. The series pressure drops reduce
the energy lost at each step and avoid problems of erosion, noise and potential flashing.

In automatic systems, low flow can be detected either by monitoring pump discharge
pressure or flow directly.

Discharge pressure measurement is typically cheaper but only suits some situations. To
make discharge pressure work, the upstream pressure changes must be small compared to
the effect of flow on pump discharge pressure. Using a more-complex differential pressure
system across the pump suction can eliminate the effect of upstream pressure changes.
Additionally, the discharge pressure curve must always be rising as flow decreases.
Discharge pressure control systems work best when the pump curve is relatively steep.

Many pumps have relatively flat curves for discharge pressure versus capacity. So, for
these pumps, its better to directly measure pump discharge flow and have a bypass control
valve respond as required to maintain minimum flow. While more expensive in the short
run, directly measured flow reduces required pump size and minimizes overall operating
costs. For most large installations its the most suitable option for low flow protection.

Which method works best depends upon the specifics of your installation. Keep the basic
requirements of the pump and how each system works in mind to make the right choice.

Site Highlight

Process Puzzler (http://ad.doubleclick.net/click%3Bh=v8/35a1/3/0/%2a/t%

3B120565610%3B0-0%3B0%3B13820817%3B18132-465/110%3B21903731/21921621/1%
3B%3B%7Esscs%3D%3fhttp://www.chemicalprocessing.com/voices/process_puzzler.html)
Readers offer suggestions to possible chemical processing scenarios. Test your skills and
offer suggestions here. http://www.chemicalprocessing.com/voices/process_puzzler.html

Copyright 2004 - 2007 Chemical Processing All rights reserved. | Legal Terms
P: 630-467-1300 | 555 West Pierce Rd., Suite 301, Itasca, IL 60143 webmaster@putman.net
Site Map

http://www.chemicalprocessing.com/articles/2007/109.html 08/01/2007 08:35:46 AM