This is the memo written by Alabama board of education outside counsel H. Lewis Gillis in response to Gov. Kay Ivey's counsel, Bryan Taylor, challenging the legality of the Aug. 23, 2017, specially-called meeting. Gillis tells board members the meeting has been legally called.
Original Title
Attorney Gillis memo to Alabama board of education re Aug. 23, 2017, meeting
This is the memo written by Alabama board of education outside counsel H. Lewis Gillis in response to Gov. Kay Ivey's counsel, Bryan Taylor, challenging the legality of the Aug. 23, 2017, specially-called meeting. Gillis tells board members the meeting has been legally called.
This is the memo written by Alabama board of education outside counsel H. Lewis Gillis in response to Gov. Kay Ivey's counsel, Bryan Taylor, challenging the legality of the Aug. 23, 2017, specially-called meeting. Gillis tells board members the meeting has been legally called.
MEANS GILLIS LAW, LLC
“ATrORNErS AND CouNseLLoRsar Law
ESTABLISHED 1981,
Ga COMMERCE STREET SUITE 200: MONTGOMERY. ALABAMA 36108-6088
TEL; Gap 20 ns: 6 205056
Lows Guus
“TyRONE C. MEANS?
"KRISTEN. GILLS
MEMORANDUM spare
Via E-Mail Only
To: Mrs. Stephanie Bell
Board Vice President - ALSBOE
State Board Members ~ ALSBOE
Date: ‘August 20, 2017
Re: Legal Authority and Policy Guidance to Call Special-Called Meeting for August 23, 2017
‘On August 17, 2017, the Members of the State Board of Education received a letter from Mr.
Brian Taylor, General Counsel to Governor ivey, regarding three referenced points for consideration by
this Board to call, schedule, and conduct a special-called meeting. Superintendent Sentence was copied
‘on this correspondence indicating coordination between his office and Mr. Taylor. However, neither the
Governor's Office nor Mr. Taylor had previously addressed any concerns, or otherwise, to this Board
regarding its legal and policy powers and authority to hold and conduct official board action at regular
and special-called meetings. This “point paper” serves to clarify the Board's legal and policy authority to
schedule special-called meetings and it sets forth a more factual and authoritative basis in response to
the stated concerns raised by Mr. Taylor, as follows:
(@) The first basis raised in the August 17, 2017 letter isa citation to Code of Ala. (1975), § 16-3-7,
regarding the legal authority to schedule and conduct official Board meetings. Interestingly, Mr.
Taylor only cites a brief phrase from this code section to support his concern. However, the
language immediately preceding the cited portion in the letter reads that, in addition to the
mandated annual July meeting, the Board can schedule and conduct, “Such other meetings may
be held as the needs of public education may require, on dates to be set by the Board in official
session...” (Emphasis added)
This statutory authority and powers given to the Board is augmented by Ala. Admin Code, r.
290-010-010-.04(1) and (10), entitled Meetings of State Board of Education, which in
conjunction with state law provide the legal authority for the Board to schedule and conduct
official board actions at both regular and special-called meetings. Section (1) prescribes that
“regular meetings... shall be held at a time and on 2 date set by the Board. The presiding officerfor each meeting shall be the President, and in his or her absence, the Vice President.”
‘Moreover, Section {10) authorizes that “special meetings of the Board may be called as provided
bystate law." Code of Ala. (1975), § 16-3-7, clearly permits, as stated above, that “such other
‘meetings may be held as the needs of public education may require...” As noted, Mr. Taylor
omitted that pertinent phrase of Section 16-3-7 and he omitted the entire administrative code
section (10) authorizing special-called meetings. It is duly noted that “the Governor has not, to
date, exercised her authority in this regard” as stated in paragraph 1 of the August 17, 2017
correspondence. However, the pivotal point to be made here is that the State Board of
Education lawfully exercised the Board's authority at its August 10, 2017 meeting by calling for @
Special-Called Meeting to be set at a mutually convenient date prior to the next regular mes
which is the Special-Called meeting on August 23, 2017. (See, streaming video of meeting).
(2) Asstated above, statutory, regulatory, and administrative authority, policy, and guidance
substantiate and uphold the Board's actions, as taken for both regular and special-called
meetings. Historical precedent, including the current administration's policy regarding Board
meetings, also serves as a distinct and supplemental basis for the August 23, 2017 and nine (9)
State Board of Education meetings have occurred since that time with five (5) of these
scheduled and conducted as special-called meetings. These special-called meetings occurred on
April 26, May 24, June 21, June 23, and July 25, 2017. In fact, the Board publicly addressed at its,
August 10, 2017 meeting its intent with upcoming dates for a special-called meeting with the
Governor's Education Policy Advisor, Ms. Christian Becraft, in attendance. No one, including Ms.
Becraft, raised any concerns or discourse regarding the Board's authority or scheduling this
special-called meeting
(3) Likewise, Mr. Taylor’s additional concerns in paragraphs two and three are also without merit.
For example, the Board had clearly satisfied the notice and purpose mandates required for a
special-called meeting. The distributed official Board Agenda for the August 23, 2017 Special-
Called Meeting states under Section (F), Action Items, the matters to be addressed, including
the Superintendent's Contract. This agenda item, and the others, undoubtedly state the Board's
intent and purpose which, pursuant to Ala. Code § 16-3-7, is in furtherance of “the needs of
public education...” which do, in fact, require immediate action due to the critical and serious
nature of the stated agenda items.*
RECOMMENDATION:
Pursuant to the aforementioned authority and well-established pattern and practice, the August 23,
2017 special-called meeting by the Board is in accord with and satisfies legal and regulatory standards
and requirements to proceed as scheduled.
» The case cited by the Governor's General Counsel (Underwood v. Alaboma State University, etal, 51 So.3d 1010
{2010}, actually supports the action being taken by this State Board of Education.