You are on page 1of 19

38 2002 91

20


80



80 90
GLGroup Leader)
GL SXSenior Expert


1982 2001 19









SX

SX
SX



SX


92 38



1980 90 1990
10
1980

1990

80
90
SX
1980


QWL
90

80
90
1980 2000 20



1980 90


93

1999
50.4 80 3
I M F J C 2
1980 2000
1980
31.8 1999 37.2
1980 300 5.4 1993
1990 420
90 97 1980 1993 13
99 2000 300 0.17
20 93 2000
0.4 2.4

1980 44300 1980 9.9
1993 66700 2000 16.9

2000 60100 0.996P 0.001
13 1988

1980 23.1
2000 44.4
1980 1986 87 1990
74.3 92 93 97


94 38

97

80 25
1990 28.5
90 20
1980
1993
2300 2200
1994 1900
98
1900
80 300 91
411 200 20

20
1990
1993



93


95

20
10
1999

1991

EXExpert

SXSenior ExpertSX
GLGroup
Leader




1980
20

20
1977

1987
87 10
1991
1999 SX
6 1999


1985, p.2431999, p.2151999
96 38

1980
1999
1-2
158

1982


18 227

19 2001

32
1-2

10
139



82 34.2
01 38.9 4.7
1982 2001

32.5 178 10.1
38.7 31 4.2
1982
43.9 16 3.7
34.2 225 9.8
33.8 50 12.2
EX 45.8 17 9.1
2001 SX 45.0 3 10.0
GL 51.3 10 4.6
1982 38.9 80 12.7
2001 8 2 2 2 5
2001 80
97

82 1982 2001

34.1 01 40.1 82 01

82 32.4 01 GL 17 7.5 10 7.2

35.0 2.6 SX
5 3.6

82 38.7 01 45.8 EX EX 31 13.7 29 20.9

7.1 43.9 51.3 GL 179 78.9 95 68.3

7.4 227 100 139 100

82 18 17



82 29 18
35 227
01 17 17978.9 3113.7
82 12 46 177.5
55 60 62 5
1.7 9.9

81 35.0 01 37.5
31.9 01 42.7
10.2
4.5
0.5

43.9 38.7
32.5 82


1982


1982 2001
1982 2001
98 38

10 GL SX
139
01 SX

GLGroup Leader) 3 EX SX
Expert) 10 GL
9.5 6.6
2.9 SX GL
GL SXS e n i o r
Expert 0.5

SX
GL GL
EX SX
EX

SX
EX
80

1982 2001

99




AA 1944
2001 57
21
1967 30


1972 28
41 1985

11 1996 52
10
SX GL 10

1982 82
82
No.4
43 35

2001
GL 10

1982 AA

48 1
35
38
43
33


100 38

100
200
300


300 GL
SX
GL 57 3 EX
EX No.2 51 SX
No.3 37 No.4 34 2 GL
3 GL
11 2001
2001 GL
SX
SX GL
SX GL SX
YD
SX 1943 56

GL SX 20
GL
1978 33
1983 38 YD 2001
2001 AA
GL

19
GL 57
SX
EX 51
EX
EX 37
SX SX
EX 34
GL
53

33
SX
27

22
GL SX
37
SX
10 21
SX
101




500

ST SX
1940 2000 60 SX
61 18 SX

SX

20 1960 SX

15 1975 35
10 1985 45 SX 40 50



SX 30
40 SX
GL
50

SX 1991 51
SX
1995 55



800


102 38



80 2000
SX





90







1991

SX
1980 SX












80
1990 1970 1980
103















1990



2001

80 1960
80
90


SX


GL

SX

SX


104 38

















80

90 80

90








80



1998
p.86 92 45
105

20



80
90



90 1980









90 2000

1980 2000

1980 2000

a





s





d
106 38

198319851989


1938 13


1963 p.44

1960


17 20
82 01


20012002
80
2002



EXSXGL
1999, p.214

93 10
Feldman/Betzold1988 EX EX
Besser1996
SX 480 4520
1997
GL
1992Sandberg 1995 SX GL
1997
90 2001
199519981999 SX

1999


2001
80


QWL Berggren, Christian, 1992 The Volvo Experience:
107

Alternatives to Lean Production in the Swedish 1983


Auto Industry, Cornell University
1997
Besser, Terry L., 1996 Team Toyota: Transplanting 1985
the Toyota Culture to the Camry Plant in Kentucky,
State University of New York Press 1989
1999
24
Feldman, Richard & Betzold, Michael, 1988 End , 25 25
of the Line: Autoworkers and American Dream, 1998
Weidenfeld & Nicolson 34
Sandberg, ke, Edi., 1995 Enriching Production: 2001
Perspectives on Volvos Uddevalla plant as an
alternative to lean production, Abebury
37
2002
Vol.
No.6 1999
1998
2001
2001 1980
10
1992 2002


2001 14
19802000 IMF
JC

1995 2000 2003

1995 12410065

1997
2002/03/14
1999
108 38

1980 2000






1980 3293 74.30 44320 230600 31.8 9.9 371 2367
1981 3220 69.49 46340 252900 32 10
1982 3144 65.12 48280 260400 32.1 10.2 337 2329
1983 3272 60.20 54350 273900 31.9 10.3 328 2227
1984 3429 61.83 55460 293130 32.2 10.7 371 2272
1985 3665 63.64 57590 307080 32.3 10.9 373 2273
1986 3660 61.18 59820 315600 32.4 11.1 373 2273
1987 3638 59.93 60700 303500 32.7 11.5 384 2277
1988 3968 65.06 60993 328747 33.1 12 276 2178
1989 3975 64.77 61370 352765 33.5 12.4 378 2270
1990 4212 66.93 62934 377487 33.5 12.6 397 2268
1991 4085 62.96 64886 373830 33.6 12.7 411 2271
1992 3931 58.99 66637 356804 33.6 12.7 341 2183.2
1993 3561 53.36 66741 369193 34.1 13.1 223 2045.4
1994 3508 53.51 65561 377610 34.7 13.9 127 1943
1995 3171 49.29 64331 403090 35.5 14.6 133 1928
1996 3410 54.13 63000 411275 36.1 15.4 156 1927
1997 3502 56.54 61933 437449 36.6 16 229 1994
1998 3165 51.14 61886 428623 36.7 16.2 250 2016
1999 3118 50.44 61821 431197 36.9 16.5 219 1983
2000 60945 443716 37.2 16.9 210 1959

IMF-JC
109

Workshop Innovation and New Work Organization in Auto Plant:


A Case Study on Toyota from 1980 to 2001

TSUJI Katsuji

Abstract: In general, there is a contradictory relationship between production efficiency and


occupational humanity. A particular system of production and labor operating in a particular
country at a particular time shows the balancing point between these two factors. In the 1980s,
Toyota suffered from labor shortages, because young workers had plenty of employment oppor-
tunities under the Bubble economy and would hesitate to work at Toyota, which was notorious
for long and hard work hours. However, after the Bubble economy, there was an oversupply in
the labor market and maturing car market. During this time, Toyotas work forces grew older
and became more highly skilled. In order to maintain its production superiority, Toyota had to
utilize these senior workers. Accordingly, a new type of work organization appeared at Toyota.
In the 1980s, Toyota had a traditional and conventional work organization that was composed of
group leaders, team leaders and team members combining to form linear relationships between
supervisors and subordinates. We call this work organization Line type. In the 1990s, a new
type of work organization developed at Toyota. There are no team leaders. Highly skilled
senior workers called SX (Senior Expert) deal with personnel matters like Kaizen and TPO
(total production maintenance). We call this work organization Line and Staff type. This
paper discusses the reasons why such a shift occurred at Toyota workshops. Analyses are based
on data obtained from a Follow-up Survey of the Toyota workers we met in 1982.

Keywords: Toyota Motor, Line Type Organization, Line and Staff Type Organization,
System of Production and Labor, Follow-up Survey

Professor of the Faculty of the Social Sciences, Ritsumeikan University

You might also like