SPECIAL ARTICLES
Tribes as Indigenous People of India
Virginius Xaxa
Defining ‘wribe' has conceptual as well as empirical problems for the academician. But this term of
‘administrative convenience has now been adopted bythe ribals themselves to mean the dispossessed, deprived
‘people of @ region. There is no claim 10 being the original inhabitants of that region, but @ prior claim
to the natural resources is asserted vis-a-vis the outsiders and the dominant caste, The tribal idemsity now
ives the marginalised peoples self-estcem and pride
‘THE ies of “indigenous people” isan
‘seve of conierstle contston in Ina
dy. This was has so il Tew years
200 ln fact. social workers, adminis
1s, politicians and even scholars widely
‘sed the erm toefertoacenaineatgo)
‘poopie. They hardly el any unease
the use of native equivalent af this ter,
vz ‘advash. Gburye had of couse some
reservation to the ase of such ers: the
expressionhe ved was so-caledaborigi=
See Again its they who took the tem
long with al he prejudices and conjec:
{arescothe mses Tat show the ides
‘iy ofadvaue Bas enered into the con-
sclounest ofthe bul people The ide
ytataas foe aponthem fortenside
revise to mask etdiferences from the
Cominant community has now been
inernalsed bythe peoplethemselves Not
‘only has i tecome an important mark of
Sil ferentiation and ident ase
tion but also an important wool oF aricu-
lation for empowerment
The tm tribe
‘The Anhroplogicl Survey of India
unde th "Poople a ncia rojcdent-
fies items in ni, They
_seemamrae at 67.583, 00 pesos cOn-
siuting €.08 per cet ofthe ta pops
Ini a per the 1991 census. The share
ofthe scheduled rie poputasion 1 the
tou population a 1971 and 1981 was6.94
and 7.85 per cent respectively. The ques-
ion of etesin ras close linked with
saninistatveandpltical considerations.
Hence there hasbeen increasing demand
by groups and communities fr thei ne
clusion in tbe Ist of scheduled wes of
‘helen Cention. That parlyexpins
‘hesteady neeas inte propeton othe
‘scheduled tte population in Ind exge=
ally inthe peneberseen 1971 2nd 198)
“There ha been more concern with the
‘dentition of bes than with their
Aefintion. This oes not mean that Fists
ave bexn daa without any conception
bie whasoever There did exist some
conception, This was obvious fem the
sf nei that were opted. These
‘angedfrommochfeatressegeopaptial
Solstion, spl techoogy and eon
tioning gencraltuckorarnesto he
pracie of animism, tba language,
pista fens ete The poblen we
Every he fat ha hey wore er
‘lsu formulated aor systematically
Apple. One st of ees wan ie in
ore cortex and gts ante in ster
Sonex The esl tht the cds
supe andcommanities kr ie
En tromeach ern espe! fot oa)
‘Svea he polation ba ote evel
of cehmlogy and ther characteris.
Indian antopotogs hae been ately
sea ofacetein sok of focueen
ther diline defines ee nd wha
they arog to describe as tes. Yet
they have coaineed withthe exkting
inet
The cay etcgrphes were rot very
“ewe hou the dtinton Bete ate
Sadie a. The 1 sony wt
ings, for expe, showed spronynous
se ofthe tem tbe with cae, iter
‘sever wed ina cognate mera one
Souk! ein he ue pane ‘at nd
teesat by Risley ard many ters
‘inthe wnings Efforts to makes i
Uinciondetween he two beganta be made
‘Mer naive was taken fo colt de
tailed intormation about the people fete
census. The census ois re Hom
ter fir fom clear with esr «0 the
itera of ston Hs hh 201
ens tht one inde mena ofeteria
owsoetr inadequate that may eT
Gefined tres at those who paced
imi. Tn the subsequent censuses
tis was repaed te eal elt
tin althcughthecrteion so uadaced
Seas bihy usatfactry, etna to
be tse widely and entnsively.
sens nke pos independence period
that mor sysenatic efor was made
tears disingusing tbe from eat
‘Trough the diction Betesn te wo
was Made in oth colonial and pest
Coleialshnogrphy.terlainbetween
oonomic and Political Weekly December 18,1989
the to was diferent conceived in the
two ethnographis. nits coll etna:
raphy the concern smn hy the Beh
lmiisratrs-scolas was To ark off
tbe rom caste, Hence bes ree shown
toteliving incomplete isolion rom the
‘es ofthe population and therefore with-
ut any ntrstion c iteration ith
‘he conta the mae cancer nthe
‘ative edographyhasbeento sho close
Ineracton ofthe tabes ith the Ise
society or the cvieation, Beth Gherye
(1962) and Bose (1975), for example
Suess the nate of interaction beeen
‘tesandthe larger Hinduscciet andthe
‘eaysinwhichinbeshave bende ino
(he Hinds societs. They stessedsimii-
tesbetwoonthetiosocltios Sina 1958)
‘even goes tothe excent of viewing rites
‘sedimeionflialetradtionhateannn
‘adequately understood uiessit s seen
in reation wo the great waction.
a view of such conception, tribes have
come to be primarily stuied in relation
tofeaures and characterises telarger
sociesy- The focus ion how tribes ae
toting absorbed ino the linger sci,
the sealed mainstream, by becoming
‘ase, peasant, class ands on. With sch
oncepushisaton the ident ofthe etal
T0up or community sindeed pot tsk,
Thisishecauseofthe way ies have been
concepuslised i anthropological ter
ture and te reference with which etal
secicy in India i sued
“Tribes ae primarily see aa tage and
‘ype of scciety. They represent x society
that lacks postive ais ofthe modem
seciety and ths constutes a simple
trae and backward socey Witchange
In these fearses or account of education,
‘moder oeupaton, 2 technology et
teal sociey is no longer considered 10
ewibal Iftransfomtionisinthe destin
of ease society then itis described as
having become caste socey, I the re
cence is peasant then its posited asthe
pessuntsccetyandifthe gereraldsecion
‘St wansfoation is socal diferension,
‘hon it is described as diflereited or
19stratified, and thus ceases to be uibal
Sociery Tn the process itis forpoten that
tobe besides Being stage and ype of
Society is asoa society alike and simi
‘oany shar kind of socey. 99 the Oriya
forthe Bengal, But tis precisely this that
comes 10 be denied on acount of the
‘hanged suation. Ofcourse tis tue that
thetrbes are not ofthe sme stage and type
ss Bengalior Oiyasocietes There ison
Something clams aureus ofthe ter
tee in desing he Indian social el
Concept of indigenous
‘Such conceptual and empirical prob-
lems inherent in the se of the term ibe
‘or bal society could to some extent be
‘overcome by the vse of the term indi-
enous bunt without giving ese to other
Problems. The term indigenous or is
‘squivalent hasbeen used i anthropology
to deserve group called trbas for quite
Some time, ls se noe has however gone
heyond the discipline of antropolery.
‘The imernational agencies are iereas:
ingly and exersively making use ofthis
termandconceptin thee deliberationsand
‘iscvssions, With his the term has come
tooccupy widecurency ingeneralas well
fs inthe other ser scienees iterate
In the deliberations of the iterations]
agencies, the term sas used forte fist
fume in 1957 [Roy-Buran undated). It
‘uined wide cureney after 1993 with he
Aoclaration ofthe year 1983 5 the icer-
rational year of the indigenous peopl
1 1957 the general conference of the
TLO adopted & convention concerning
protection and integration of indigenous
Endotheribalandemi-ribal popelation
{nindepensent countries, The convention
framed generaliniemational standards for
facilitating government actions towacds
protecting and promoting. progressive
Imtegrationf these people athe respoc-
tive national communities (Convention
No 107)- By 1985 the TLO felt the need
to revise the convention on account of
‘anges insides and approaches 1
‘vars these people wedldwide. The ILO
ad eacher proposed imegration a the