Logistic Regression

Case Processing Summary

Unweighted Casesa N Percent
Included in Analysis 129 100,0
Selected Cases Missing Cases 0 ,0
Total 129 100,0
Unselected Cases 0 ,0
Total 129 100,0
a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.

Dependent Variable Encoding

Original Value Internal Value
Mati 0
Hidup 1

Block 0: Beginning Block

Iteration Historya,b,c
Iteration -2 Log likelihood Coefficients
Constant
1 164,241 ,667
Step 0 2 164,221 ,693
3 164,221 ,693
a. Constant is included in the model.
b. Initial -2 Log Likelihood: 164,221
c. Estimation terminated at iteration number 3 because
parameter estimates changed by less than ,001.

Classification Tablea,b
Observed Predicted
Status Kematian Neonatal Percentage
Mati Hidup Correct
Mati 0 43 ,0
Status Kematian Neonatal
Step 0 Hidup 0 86 100,0
Overall Percentage 66,7
a. Constant is included in the model.
b. The cut value is ,500

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)
Step 0 Constant ,693 ,187 13,773 1 ,000 2,000
Variables not in the Equation
Score df Sig.
Asfi 91,507 1 ,000
BL 41,103 1 ,000
Variables UMR 3,512 1 ,061
Step 0
Par ,017 1 ,897
ANC 22,053 1 ,000
Overall Statistics 94,163 5 ,000

Block 1: Method = Enter

Iteration Historya,b,c,d
Iteration -2 Log Coefficients
likelihood Constant Asfi BL UMR Par ANC
1 69,794 -5,656 3,001 ,666 -,120 ,035 ,198
2 58,885 -8,320 3,971 1,346 -,304 ,079 ,488
3 57,138 -9,793 4,425 1,791 -,510 ,104 ,798
Step 1
4 57,022 -10,222 4,571 1,919 -,604 ,103 ,935
5 57,021 -10,257 4,585 1,929 -,614 ,102 ,950
6 57,021 -10,258 4,585 1,929 -,614 ,102 ,950
a. Method: Enter
b. Constant is included in the model.
c. Initial -2 Log Likelihood: 164,221
d. Estimation terminated at iteration number 6 because parameter estimates changed by less than ,
001.

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.
Step 107,199 5 ,000
Step 1 Block 107,199 5 ,000
Model 107,199 5 ,000

Model Summary
Step -2 Log likelihood Cox & Snell R Nagelkerke R
Square Square
1 57,021a ,564 ,784
a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 6 because parameter
estimates changed by less than ,001.

Hosmer and Lemeshow Test

Step Chi-square df Sig.
1 6,854 7 ,444
Contingency Table for Hosmer and Lemeshow Test
Status Kematian Neonatal = Mati Status Kematian Neonatal = Hidup Total
Observed Expected Observed Expected
1 15 14,688 0 ,312 15
2 11 11,181 1 ,819 12
3 11 11,412 3 2,588 14
4 3 2,490 5 5,510 8
Step 1 5 1 ,904 12 12,096 13
6 1 1,075 16 15,925 17
7 0 ,444 14 13,556 14
8 0 ,661 26 25,339 26
9 1 ,145 9 9,855 10

Classification Tablea
Observed Predicted
Status Kematian Neonatal Percentage
Mati Hidup Correct
Mati 38 5 88,4
Status Kematian Neonatal
Step 1 Hidup 4 82 95,3
Overall Percentage 93,0
a. The cut value is ,500

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) 95% C.I.for EXP(B)
Lower Upper
Asfi 4,585 ,892 26,403 1 ,000 97,988 17,048 563,215
BL 1,929 ,831 5,389 1 ,020 6,882 1,350 35,073
UMR -,614 ,950 ,418 1 ,518 ,541 ,084 3,484
Step 1a Par ,102 ,782 ,017 1 ,896 1,107 ,239 5,128
ANC ,950 ,891 1,138 1 ,286 2,586 ,451 14,813
Constant -10,258 2,666 14,806 1 ,000 ,000
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: Asfi, BL, UMR, Par, ANC.

Correlation Matrix
Constant Asfi BL UMR Par ANC
Constant 1,000 -,201 -,619 -,368 -,453 -,234
Asfi -,201 1,000 -,004 -,519 ,174 -,213
BL -,619 -,004 1,000 ,103 -,026 ,069
Step 1
UMR -,368 -,519 ,103 1,000 -,042 -,014
Par -,453 ,174 -,026 -,042 1,000 -,201
ANC -,234 -,213 ,069 -,014 -,201 1,000