Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1
R. Bultmann, Der Stil der paulinischen Predikt und die kynisch-stoische Diatribe (Gttingen,
1910), 92.
2
2
!J#'/,-%6(' %")# (# , '"'-)/) K/8)1 )0)"( /% 1, (," 08'* 56-)'?* -"'
/() 2%@1)#) 56- 9-11 ("(%2) @'8*). D1. 2)# (," )")@'8 /('" 8' K/8)1 -% (,"
""'#) ('? 1)' ('? G%' /() 56- 9,25-26, 10,21 2)# 11,12.
3
06* $)8)2(,8#/(#2 )")@8%# ' M. Theobald, Der Rmerbrief (Darmstadt:
Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, EdF 294, 2000), 271, 3#) (#* /$/%#* %4"#2" 2)#
K/8),1#(" '" :%/'" 4'+ F.%$( 7$" 4=5 0A5"75 :"$.4$+%A-7$5 0<$"4$* 4'+
H%".4' 7$" 74'40 :05 05$" #('5 :+5$45 5$ 0<04I'54$" <0,=%".4.
3
4
U. Wilckens, Der Brief an die Rmer, 1-3 (Neukirchen-Vluyn, 1987-1989), (. 2, 247, /,-.
1105.
4
5
C.H. Dodd, The Epistle of Paul to the Romans (London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1932), 180.
6
M.Theobald, Der Rmerbrief (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, EdF 294,
2000), 77.
7
D#E1#'38)@#2 /(,8M%()# 2)# /(' 848' ('? K. H. Rengstorf, "Das lbaum-Gleichnis
in Rm 11,16ff. Versuchung einer weitfhrenden Deutung," in Donum Gentilicum (FS D.
Daube), 127-164 (Oxford, 1978).
8
L#) (' /?32%28#-"' /,-%#"%# (# '# )")@'8* 0'? ?08$'?" %")# 13%* 2)#
-%()3%"/(%8%* 2)# )82%( )8#/(%*.
9
M.Theobald, Der Rmerbrief (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, EdF 294,
2000, 77.
10
!"(4%(), 06* :, /,-%#/)-%, ' R. Bultmann, Der Stil der paulinischen Predikt und
die kynisch-stoische Diatribe (Gttingen, 1910),88-94, :%" )J#'1'3% 4%(#2 (, $8/, )0
('" >)1' -%()@'8" 08'28"'"()* (," :#)(8#E, /('#$%' 0'? /?M,( )")1?(#2 '
M.Theobald, .0., 75-76.
5
-%()@'8" (6" %0#/('1" ('? >)1'? 2)# %2%"6" (,* >.H. %")#
/,-)"(#2. -6*, -)* %3216EM%# /% ")" %4"'2%"(8#/- ?08 ('?
K/8)1. !?(, 2)( (, 3"-, -)*, :%" @)"%()# ") ()#8#M%# -% (,
/2F, ('? >)1'?, 3# )?( 4%68'-% (# 4) 080%# ") )")M,(/'?-%
(, 1/, ('? 08'E1-)('* )11'. P)?($8'") 4%68'-% 0'1
/,-)"(#2 (," %0#/-)"/, ('? M. Theobald 3#) (," $8,/#-(,() (,*
-%()@'8* 2)# 0#/(%'?-% (# , E)4(%8, 08'/33#/, )?(' 2)4
)?( ('? /$-)('* (,* -%()@'8* (,* )11,3'8)* -0'8% ") -)*
)"'J%# "'?* %8-,"%?(#2'* '8M'"(%*.
I?"%$M'"()* (, /"('-, 0%8#3,/ -)* /(#* :#@'8%* %8-,"%%*
('? 56- 11,17-24, )")@8'?-% (# /% 0)8-'#' /?-08)/-) -% )?(
('? C. H. Dodd 2)(1,J% 2)# ' W. D. Davies. I?32%28#-") ?0'/(8#J%
(# ' >)1'* /(' 56- 11,17-24 0)8'-'#M%# ('?* %J %4"" $8#/(#)"'*
-% (," )38#%1# 2)# ('?* 2)(,3'8% 13'"()* (# ...'" 0< 0A55
,%".4"$5' #%'%,'54$" $# 4-5 $6%"0(" 7$" :05 ,'+5 4#'40 5$
#%'.?%'+5. >"$ 5$ 7$%#'?'%.'+5 A$ #%#0" 5$ /#'("$.4'5 .4-5
/0%- 0(", 4-* '#'$* - %I$ 05$" ' K&%$/, ' #$4%$* 4'+ F.%$(11.
P' )J#'/,-%6(' %")# (# 2)()13%# /(' /?-08)/-) )?(, ('
)8",(#2 3#) ('?* %J %4"" $8#/(#)"'* 2)# 4%(#2 3#) ('" K/8)1,
$68* ") /(,8M%()# /% 2%-%"' (,* %0'$* ('? >)1'?, /$%(#2 -% (,"
2)11#83%#) (,* %1#*. H%" 1)-E"%#, :,1):, ?0F, ('? (," 1,
0'1#(#/-#2 /?"@%#) (,* %0'$*. !"(4%(), E)/M%()# /(' 56- 11,1,
/(' '0'' ' >)1'* )?('08'/:#'8M%()# -% ?0%8,@"%#) 6*
K/8),1(,* 13'"()* $)8)2(,8#/(#2: L6= '5, / #.$4' A0*
45 ($5 $4'; / 65'"4' 7$ 6% 6 .%$-(4-* 0/, 7 .#%/$4'*
&%$/, ?+(* X05"$/5. (/# , %8-,"%?(#2 ('? %0#1'3 %-0':M%#
('" %8%?",( ") %"('0/%# (' 2%"(8#2 /,-%' ('? )11,3'8#2' $68'?
('? >)1'?.
J 7'"5=5"'('6"7 $##0"%$ 0%/-50$* 4'+ ,=%'+
!0 (," 11, -%8# , )00%#8) (6" A. G. Baxter 2)# J. A. Ziesler
/(@4,2% -% -%3)1(%8, %0#(?$). N# 0)8)0"6 %8%?",(*
/(,8#M-%"'# /('" /3$8'"' ('? >)1'? Columella, ' '0''*
)/$'14,2% -%()J 116" 2)# -% (#* (%$"#2* -0'1#/-)('* (,*
%1#*, :%#J)" (# ' >)1'* 3"8#M% (#* %" 136 (%$"#2*.
!")@%8-%"'*, ' 0)8)0"6 /?338)@)* /% )?(* 0%8#38@%# (#
()" ") -%8' :":8' %1#* %")# 3%8)/-"' /?",4M%()# ")
-0'1#M'?" /% )?( ") 21): )38#%1#* 2)# (/# (' -%8' :":8'
)")M6'3'"%()#12. N# %8%?",(* /(,8#M-%"'# /(," 01,8'@'8) )?(
@(#/)" -#) 01%?8 ('? 4-)(* -)* #/$?8#M-%"'# (# ' >)1'*
4%1% -% (," 0)84%/, (,* )11,3'8)* 2)# #:#)(%8) -% /) )"@%8%
/('?* /(. 17 2)# 19 ") ('"/%# 2)# (' %?%83%(#2 )0'(1%/-) ('?
%-E'1#)/-' )?('. :%#J)", :,1):, (# ' >)1'* 4%1% ") ('"/%#
11
W. D. Davies, "Paul and the Gentliles: A Suggestion Concerning Romans 11:13-24," in
Jewish and Pauline Studies, 153-163 (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1984), 160.
12
Columella, Res rustica 5.9.16: Solent etiam quamvis laetae arbores fructum non afferre. Eas
terebrari gallica terebra convenit, atque ita in foramen viridem taleam oleastri arcte immitti. Sic
velut inita arbor fecundo semine fertilior extat. (Q 0)84%/, %")# )0 (' 848' ('? F.
Esler, Ancient Oleiculture and Ethnic Differentiation: The Meaning of the Olive-Tree
Image in Romans 11, JSNT 26.1 (2003): 103-124), 118.
6
!!
17
H. Lausberg, Handbuch der literarischen Rhetorik (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 1990).
18
M. Hartung, "Die kultische bzw. agrartechnisch-biologische Logik der Gleichnisse von
der Teighebe und vom lbaum im Rm 11.16-24 und die sich daraus ergebenden
theologischen Konsequenzen ," NTS 45 (1999): 127-140.
19
M. Hartung, .0., 139-140.
8
20
D1., -%()J 116", F. Siegert, Argumentation bei Paulus gezeigt an Rm 9-11 (Tbingen,
1985), passim T. H. Tobin, Paul's Rhetoric in Its Context : The Argument of Romans
(Peabody, 2004) R. Jewett, Romans (Minneapolis, 2007), passim.
21
!")1?(#2 E1. -%()J 116" R. Jewett, Romans (Minneapolis, 2007).666-672.
22
D1. )")1?(#2, -%()J 116", F. Siegert, Argumentation bei Paulus gezeigt an Rm 9-11
(Tbingen, 1985)passim T. H. Tobin, Paul's Rhetoric in Its Context : The Argument of Romans
(Peabody, 2004), passim R. Jewett, Romans (Minneapolis, 2007), passim.
9
23
L#) (' 0)8:%#3-) E1. R. Dean Anderson Jr., Glosary of Greek Rhetorical Terms (Leuven,
2000), 87-88.
24
56- 11,13: (: /5 : (6= 4'* A50."5 ? .'5 /5 '5 0/" 6 A55 #.4'('*,
45 :"$7'5$5 /'+ :'<I=.
25
56- 11,12-15:
12: 0 : 4 #$%#4=/$ $45 #('4'* /(. 12: !. P' 0)80(6-) 2)# ('
7./'+ 7$ 4 44-/$ $45 #('4'* 0186-) (6" K/8),1#(" E',4 ('?*
A55, #. /(('5 4 #(%=/$ $45. %4"#2'*
13: /5 : (6= 4'* A50."5 ? .'5 /(. 13: D. N >)1'* )0/('1'* (6"
/5 '5 0/" 6 A55 #.4'('*, 45 %4""
:"$7'5$5 /'+ :'<I=,
/(. 14: D. N >)1'* )0/('1'* (6"
14: 0 #=* #$%$I-(.= /'+ 45 .%7$ 7$ K/8),1#("
..= 4"5* < $45.
/(. 15: !V. P' 0)80(6-) 2)# ('
15: 0 6% #'&'( $45 7$4$(($6 0186-) (08/1,F,) (6" K/8),1#("
7./'+, 4* #%.(-/Z"* 0 / I= 7 E',4 () 4",
507%5;
26
56- 11,24: 0 6% . 7 4* 7$4 ?."5 <07#-* 6%"0($'+ 7$ #$% ?."5
507054%.A-* 0* 7$(("($"'5, #. /(('5 '4'" ' 7$4 ?."5 67054%".A.'54$"
4 : ($). D1. 2)# 56- 12,15.
27
56- 11,21: 0 6% A0* 45 7$4 ?."5 7(:=5 '7 ?0.$4', [/ #=*] ': .'
?0.04$".
28
56- 11,16: 0 : #$%, 6$, 7$ 4 ?%$/$ 7$ 0 I$ 6$, 7$ ' 7(:'").
29
D1. F. Siegert, Argumentation bei Paulus gezeigt an Rm 9-11 (Tbingen, 1985), 167.
10
35
L#) (#* :#)(8#E* 0'? $8,/#-'0'#% ' >)1'* /(," 08'* 56-)'?* E1. R. Bultmann,
Der Stil der paulinischen Predikt und die kynisch-stoische Diatribe (Gttingen, 1910), passim
S. T. Stowers, The Diatribe and Paul's Letter to the Romans (Chico: Scholar Press, 1981)
passim ('? :#'?, The Diatribe, /% Greco-Roman Literature and the New Testament, 71-84
(Atlanda, Georgia, 1988) R. Jewett, Romans (Minneapolis, 2007), 25-27.
36
R. Bultmann, Der Stil der paulinischen Predikt und die kynisch-stoische Diatribe (Gttingen,
1910), passim.
37
S. A. Stowers, The Diatribe and Paul's Letter to the Romans (Chico: Scholar Press, 1981, 86-
93. E1. 2)# R. Jewett, Romans (Minneapolis, 2007), 25.
12
38
D1. 2)# R. Jewett, Romans (Minneapolis, 2007), 688 2)# /,-. 226.
39
I-@6") -% ('" P8@6"), 20% 4%#=5 : 4%#'* : .4" (6'* 7$4 #$%$4%'#5
4' 7+%'+ (06/05'* 7$4 4"5$ :(=."5 7'./"=4%$5 7$4 4 5$67$'5. Q
0)84%/, %")# )0 ('" H. Lausberg, 552.
40
Q -%()@'8, )28#E/(%8), %")# -#) %#2"), 06* $)8)2(,8#/(#2 )")@8%# 2)# '
!8#/('(1,* /(, 5,('8#2, 1406b: 7$" - 0"75$ 05$" 0:'* /04$?'%*. J :"$?'%
/04$< 4=5 05$" #'( /"7%. 4.", 4$5 ' /-%'* (60" 6"$ 4'5 K,"(($ 4" %/-.0
.$5 ("'54%", ,'+/0 0"75$ 7$" 4$5 (60" 4" 4' ("'54%" $+4 %/-.0, ,'+/0
/04$?'%. D1. 2)# H. Lausberg, Handbuch der literarischen Rhetorik (Stuttgart: Franz
Steiner, 1990), 552-598 (3#) ('?* (80'?*) 2)# 558-564 3#) (," -%()@'8.
41
D1. )")1?(#2 H. Lausberg, 895-901 R. Dean Anderson Jr., Glosary of Greek
Rhetorical Terms (Leuven, 2000), 14-16.
13
42
D1. R. Jewett, Romans (Minneapolis, 2007), 29 2)# 681.
43
L#) (' (# , 08'* 56-)'?* %0#/('1 %")# :'-,-", 8,('8#2 E1. )")1?(#2 ('
?0-",-) ('? R. Jewett, Romans (Minneapolis, 2007).
44
D1. !8#/('(1'?*, @-4'%"7 1356b 1395b -1396a. D1. 2)# H. Lausberg, Handbuch der
literarischen Rhetorik (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 1990), 371.
45
!8#/('(1'?*, @-4'%"7 1356b (Q -%(@8)/, ('? 2%#-"'? %")# ('? Q. Q1#',
K%".4'4(-* @-4'%"7, O2:/%#* K. [)$)80'?1'*, !4")).
46
!8#/('(1'?*, @-4'%"7 1357a.
47
06* 2)"% 0.$. ' H. D. Betz, Der Galaterbrief ( . S. Ann)
(Mnchen, 1988).
14
48
06* -)* :%#J% W. Wuellner, "Paul's Rhetoric of Argumentation in Romans," CBQ 38
(1976): 330-351 E1. 2)# )"(/('#$, /$%(#2 )00%#8) /(," O11:) )0 (," A.
>)0):,-,(8'?, Q 8,('8#2 )"1?/, (,* L8)@* /% >(..$ 7$" 0%/-50$ 4-*
[$"5* \"$A7-*, 79-118 (G%//)1'"2,, 2004).
49
J. D. Moors, Wrestling with Rationality in Paul : Romans 1-8 in a new perspective
(Cambridge, 1995), 25
50
J. D. Moors, Wrestling with Rationality in Paul : Romans 1-8 in a new perspective
(Cambridge, 1995), 32.
51
D1. D. Zeller, Der Brief an die Rmer. bersetzt und Erklrt (Regensburg, 1985), 197 H.
Risnen, "Rm 9-11, Analyse eines geistigen Ringes," in ANRW 25.4, 2891-2939 (Berin /
New York, 1987), %#:#2 2914.
15
52
Ph. F. Esler, Ancient Oleiculture and Ethnic Differentiation: The Meaning of the
Olive-Tree Image in Romans 11, JSNT 26.1 (2003): 103-124, passim.
16
(8(' /,-)"(#2 8,('8#2 /$-) 0'? $8,/#-'0'#% ' >)1'* /(' %"
136 )11,3'8#2 %"4-,-). >82%#()# 3#) (," #%'.=#'#'"q$.
3) I(' /?-08)/-) )?( 2)()13'?-%, 3#)( ' >)1'*, %" )8$M%#
") )@,3%()# (," )11,3'8), )08/-%") 3#) -)*, 08'/$%:#)/-") 3#)
%2%"'", :,-#'?83% ")" /?"'-#1,( 2)# )8$M%# ")" :#1'3' -)M
('?, -/6 ('? '0''? J%(?13%# (," )11,3'8). >82%#()# 3#) -#)
)2-, 8,('8#2 0)8-E)/, ('? )0'/(1'?, 0'? %")# , $8/, ('?
8,('8#2' /$-)('* (,* 08'/60'0'#])*. I-@6") -% (, 8,('8#2
($", , #%'.=#'#'"q$53 %")# , :,-#'?83) )0 ('" /?338)@) %"*
$)8)2(8), %#2'"#2' /?"'-#1,(, ' '0''* /?--%($%# /(," /?M(,/,
2)# /(, :#)-8@6/, (,* %0#$%#8,-)('1'3)*. N >)1'* /(' 56 11,17-
21 :,-#'?83% ")" )"1'3' $)8)2(8), 06* 2"%# 2)# 08#" /(' 56-
7,7-12. !?(* 0)8'?/#M%()# 6* ")* %4"#2* $8#/(#)"* 0'?
)1)M'"#2 )?('08'E11%()# 6* )"(%8'* (6" K/8),1#(", )@'
0)8"%# (, 4/, ('?*, ()" )?(' )0'20('"()# )0 (, $8#/(#)"#2
2'#"(,(). A)( (, /(#$'-?4) )?( ' >)1'* )0'@%3%#, 06*
%:)-%, ") )"(#0)8)(%4% "('") -)M ('? )0)"("()* -% ")
2)1* (/(.20). >)811,1), @8'"(M%# ") )0%?4"%# 08'* )?(" 1)
%2%") () )0':'2#-)/(#2 13#) 0'? 4) 4%1% ") )0%?4"%#
2)(%?4%)" 08'* ('?* )1)M"%* %J %4"" $8#/(#)"'*, 06* @)"%()#
)0 (, $8/, ('? 08'/60#2* )"(6"?-)* / 2)# 8,-(6" /%
:%(%8' %"#2 08/60'54. !2-,, ' >)1'* @8'"(M%# ") 0)8'?/#/%#
('" %#2'"#2 /?"'-#1,( (/#, /(% '# %4"#2' $8#/(#)"', ('?* '0''?*
?0'"'%, ") -," 08'/E1,4'", 11) 0)811,1) ")
/?"%#:,('0'#/'?" (# 1) /) ' >)1'* )0'::%# :#) (,* )11,3'8)*
/% )?(" /$%(M'"()# -% %2%"'?*. B% (, $8/,, :,1):, (,*
08'/60'0'#])* ' >)1'* )0'@%3%# (," 2)(%?4%)" )"(#0)84%/, -%
('?* 08)3-)(#2'* )1)M"%* %4"#2'$8#/(#)"'* (,* 5-,* 2)# (/#
%0#(?3$"%# ") ?0'E)4-/%# --%/) 1) %2%") () /('#$%) 0'? 4)
J?")" (#* /$/%#* -%()J (6" :?' '-:6" (6" '0):" ('? K,/', (6"
%4"#2'$8#/(#)"" 2)# (6" K/8),1#(" $8#/(#)"". O:
)0'2)10(%()# , $8,/#-(,() (,* 08'/60'0'#])*. !" :%" ?08$%
)?(, ((% o /($'* 17 )11 2)# (' ?01'#0' 2%-%"' 2#":?"%'?" ")
4%68,4'" 6* 2)( -(60' 0'1%-#2 2)( (6" %4"#2" $8#/(#)""
8) 2)# 6* ?0'E#E)/-* 2)# %J'?4"6/ ('?* /% /$/, -% ('?* %J
K'?:)6" $8#/(#)"'*. ") )2-, 4%(#2 /('#$%' (,* $8/,* (,*
53
L#) (," 08'/60'0'#]) E1. R. Dean Anderson Jr., Glosary of Greek Rhetorical Terms
(Leuven, 2000), 106-107 2)# 61, 0'? 3"%()# /":%/, ('? 8'? -% (," A'#'"q$. O:
)01* /,-%#"'?-% (# '# :#@'8'# /?338)@%* 8,('8#2" %3$%#8#:6"
$8,/#-'0'#'" 11%* '"'-)/%* 3#) (," #%'.=#'#'"q$. >.$. N M. F. Qunitilianus,
Institutionis Oratoriae, IX, 2,29-37, (," )0'2)1% sermocinatio, %" /(' 83' Retorica ad
Herennium '"'-M%()# conformatio. D1. 2)# H. Lausberg, Handbuch der literarischen
Rhetorik (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 1990), 820-825 )11 2)# 826-829. O: )JM%# ")
0)8)4/6 2)# (," 0'1(#-, 3) (, 8,('8#2 2:'/, ('? 83'? ('? M. F. Quintilianus,
Institutionis Oratoriae - Libri XII (Ausbildung des Redners - Zwlf Bcher), Hrsg. Helmut Rahm,
bers. Helmut Rahm, 2 Bde. (Darmstadt: (WBG) Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Texte zur
Forschung, 2006).
. . M. Landfester, (Hrg.), Geschichte der
antiken Texte. Autoren- und Werklexikon (Stuttgart, 2007), 20-521.
54
D1. T. H. Tobin, Paul's Rhetoric in Its Context : The Argument of Romans (Peabody, 2004),
363.
17
55
(/#, -%()J 116", '# H. Schlier, Der Rmerbrief (Freiburg, 1977), 333 2)# J. D. G.
Dunn, Romans 1-8 ; Romans 9-16, 2 (-. (Dallas: WBC 38a, 38b, 1988), (. 2, 662.
56
(/# 0.$. ' Ph. F. Esler, Ancient Oleiculture and Ethnic Differentiation: The Meaning
of the Olive-Tree Image in Romans 11, JSNT 26.1 (2003): 103-124., 300 2)# 305.
57
D1. 2)# C. Johnson Hodge, "Olive Trees and Ethnicities: Judeans and Gentiles in Rom.
11.17-24," in Christians as a Religious Minority in a Multicultural City: Modes of Interaction and
Identity Formation in Early Imperial Rom, 84 (New York, 2004), 84.
58
L#) () $)8)2(,8#/(#2 ('? 8'? /('" >)1' E1. J. Hainz, 7'"5=5$ 7(#., P-. II, /%
EWNT , 749-755.
18
!!!