Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Up 22
Up 22
A. Introduction
The concept in communication is to use the language. Language is very important in
all aspects of life, especially as we are human beings. In daily life, people use
the language to express what is in their hearts and thoughts to others. In
forwarding, human beings to pass some process from a thought to be a language that
has been mentioned. Included in the process that is language acquisition for kids,
processing language in the brain, delivery language, etc. If it was seen from the
psychology, language is associated with a psychological one. Will be very different
languages in which people who are pleased with the people who are angry or sad, the
man who was sick with healthy person, who is in a tired, and the people who are in
a fit, all will be different.[1]
In terms Of language acquisition for kids, those who have been trained to use
English mother and good and right, will be comfortable to use English is good and
right, is inversely proportional to the since he was a kid does not have been
trained to use English well and correctly, and he will not be comfortable with it.
Besides the above, other things that language-related someone is biological
conditions, in this case the nerves. Nerves is a computer system link that made an
idea to a phrase language.
Initially, psycholinguistics is not independent knowledge, which is examined in
particular. Psycholinguistics is the knowledge that studied separately by both the
linguistic experts as well as experts psychology. The term psycholinguistics itself
was first used by Thomas A. Sebeok and Charles E. Osgood in 1954 in a book entitled
Psycholinguistik : A survey of Theory and Research Problems. Although in fact,
recent studies firmly grounded has started since the days of socratic Method and
Panini.[2]
As we have seen that language is a symbol system (symbol) the noise of the
arbitrary agreed to be used by the members of the group community to identify
themselves, working together, or interact, then in this case also had contacts with
language human soul. Both psychology and language (linguistics), both have
closeness that help and to serve people so that they could live with good and
easily. But, in understanding a scientific disciplines should we delve into study
of the scientific disciplines. Psycholinguistics is a joint or combination of
discipline of psychology with discipline of the linguistic. One cannot explain
toeing around issues (at psycholinguistics with only guessing or consider from his
name only. Of course, psycholinguistics not only discuss levels language that is
influenced by on a person, in a study disciplines, discussed the relationship
psycholinguistics psychological man in using language.
I. History of psycholinguistics
Psycholinguistics is knowledge hybrid that is, knowledge, which was a compound
examine both of psychology and linguistic. Seed this knowledge actually have
appeared in the 20th century when psychologist Germany, Wilhelm Wundt said that
language can be explained by the principles of the psychological (Kess, 1992). At
that time study language began to change from his nature that aesthetic and
cultural to an approach that "scientific."
Meanwhile in the Americas connection between language with knowledge people also
have started to grow. This development can be divided into four stages (Kess,
1992): (a) formative phase,(b) linguistic phase, (c) cognitive phase and (d) theory
psycholinguistics phase, psychological reality, and cognitive science.[3]
a. The formative phase
John W. Gardner, a psychologist from Carnegie Corporation, America, in the middle
ages to 20th centuries, began formulating hybrid (the conjunction) both knowledge.
This idea and then developed by a psychologist, John B. Carroll, who held a seminar
at the University of Corrnell for initiating an interrelationship between the two
knowledge discipline is at the end of 1951. At the end of 1953, the meeting was
continued at the University of Indiana. This meeting to make the resonance that is
so strong among the experts knowledge soul and the language so that a lot of
research and then be directed to link between the two this science (Osgood and
Sebeok, 1954). It is the time when psikolinguistics was first used.[4]
b. The linguistic phase
The development of the linguistic re-oriented in the bloodstream behavioristik then
moved to mentalisme (psychological nativism) in 1957 with published books Noam
Chomsky, Syntactic Struktures and sharp criticism from Noam Chomsky to the theory
behavioristik B. F. Skinner has made psycholinguistics as knowledge that many
interested by people. And develops rapidly because this view Noam Chomsky about
universal language is getting lead to language acquisition for kids especially why
children in any language, get them by using a strategy that period.[5]
A common strategy is supported by developing of science neolinguistik and
biolinguistik. A study in neolinguistik shows that human brain has decreed that is
different from other primate in structure and function. There are people In the
brain that is set aside for language while in an animal parts of this is not there.
Biolinguistik is a science hybrid between biology and linguistically and trying to
answer questions five central in a study language that was put forward by Noam
Chomsky: (1) what is meant by knowledge language, (2) how this knowledge, (3) how
knowledge was applied (4) brain mechanism which is relevant in this case (5) how
this knowledge have a role in human species (Jenkins 2000). First question refers
to a knowledge of language that human knowledge such as what is owned by people so
that he was able to speak. This is associated with the second question where it
came from this knowledge. Wheather knowledge has already been there since human
beings are born (innate) or by from environmental man is born. Third trying to
answer questions about how knowledge was applied on the data. With the knowledge
that we have a parameter what we use to process and digest input that goes to us.
The four questions related to the role human brain that distinguish it from the
brain animals and last question refers to circumstances that distinguishes human
beings with animals that is what knowledge and ability to speak, owned exclusive
man.[6]
Nexus between language with neobiologi support a Noam Chomsky, said that growth
language in human beings programd genetically. Human beings are born in the world
is not with an empty plate (theory tabula taste). Time was born human cases have
been supplied with what he gets called faculties of the mind (over plots young)
that one of its specially created for language acquisition for kids. According to
Noam Chomsky, people have provisions for rapid humanity advancement (innate
properties) time was born and provisions are then made it to be able to develop
their language.
The scholars have been many investigating and trying to teach animals speak
(Kellogs 1933; Hayes 1947; Gardner1966; Terrace, 1979, but has not even one of
them, which is considered a success. Cave, a chimpanzee that is examined by
Professor and Puan kellogg, can understand about seventy words but he could not
speak . Viki, a chimpanzee that was taught by Dr. and Puan Hayes, and finally, only
can tell papa, mama, cup, and up. Professor and Puan Gardner to train a chimpanzee
Washoe using sign language. Washoe contributed only about 100 words in the 21
months, but it is still could not speak. A Chimpanzee who had been trained by
Herbert Terrace called Nim Chimsky (as a joke to public is exposed to powerful
persuasive Noam Chomsky.) seems to indicate that there is a capability combining
the words, but after examined more obvious that ability, but only vague.
They got language is unique to humans, only people may treat one another unjustly
who can speak. Other creatures can do many things, including things that were done
by people but the ability to merge them is only limited in circumstances that non-
verbal. As soon as they were protesting at a verbal eastward to them is different
from that of man.[7]
Example: Compassion, his feet debt side but he must bear millstone for a bag that
we are looking for food on a day this heat.
In terms of their own language, the English language structure is creative because
allows users to manipulate it during the rule rule certain followed. In a sentence
that ended with the name, for example, we can always add clause relative, and if
clause this relative also ended with the name, we still can be expanded to memory
we restrictive. It was clear From the example kreativiti language.
Example: The indicator feeling burned the house that owned by people who steal
their property that is stored in a bank that would be suspended by the government
is trying to become golden economy that . .
c. Third, language can be used to express situation or the events that have
been past or that it has not happened and even for something that was shaded to
imagine. Language structure allows us to talk about the incident that happened
yesterday or even hundreds of years ago. Human language possible we are talking
about rain evening overnight or things about Sultan Mansor Shah students from the
kingdom Malacca. Language structure allows us to talk about what we intend or will
happen in the future. We can even thought speaking about or dreams. Things like
this is not to be found in a means of communication animals.[12]
Animals, like a swarm of bees, can also said that the new honey that he saw, but
the ability like this is very limited. If the leading to a honeycomb bees, passing
through their nests, he will lead to a honeycomb the first.
d. The four, languages have double structure which is called the structure
hidden (deep structure) and the structure was born (surfsce popularly). In many
ways both this structure is united so that is not seen the difference. In the
example as below, both structure in nor surface structure is the same.
Example: Many experts parliament that pour.
But in many other things there is a structure the surface that actually has two
structures in different ways. In the following example:
Example: 1. The shooting of the hunter was terrible (deep structure)
We see that there is a structure the surface. However, one sentence has two
structures in a different. So far, the meaning is that no two also, namely:
a. The hunter shot someone cracked me and the way he did it feel very bad.
b. Someone cracked me shot the hunter and this action was very bad.
Here appears the hidden that the two (1) due to the existence of two structures in
a different as seen in (a-b). It is not impossible that there were there two
structures the surface, but actually represents two structures in a different.
Example:
2. John is easy to please
3. John is eager to please
We see that the two sentences have been born are exactly the same structure:
subject followed by the verb is, adjective easy/eager, infinitifto; and please.
But, from (2) we can to make sentences (2a) while from (3) we will not be able to
make sentences (3a).[13]
2a. It is easy to please John.
3a. *It is eager to please John.
So, although (2) and (3) seems to have a same structure, it turns out that
similarities, there is only on the surface. The phrase for the second sentence is
different as seen in fact (2a) and (3a).
On the other hand, can occur in the existence of two sentences that surface
structure but different structure it. Note:
4. They beat me.
5. I was beaten by people.
Both the verse have meaning that period, the difference is that this sentence (4)
form sentences active while passive sentences (5).
V. Language component
Phology indeed had various changes, both in terms of the foundation philosophy or
principal. The debate between the behavioris with the people of this mentalist
produce a major changes in the science language: science language now dominated by
the people of this mentalist. But there was one thing he stays constant, namely,
the components language.
In the bloodstream linguistic any language always say has three components: syntax,
phonology, and semantics. Components syntax to handle affairs related to the word,
the phrase, and his words. Study about the words, such as study about how the words
were established and sent down, generally are dealt with in a the argument that is
named morphology. Although morphology is getting to obtain a place as a subilmu
itself, especially when it has been developing morphology generative (see Halle,
1973; Aronoff, 1976; Scalise, 1984; Jensen, 1990; Spencer, 1991; Katamba, 1993), in
relation with components language knowledge is included as part of the components
syntax.[18]
At the time mainstream theory mentalistic pioneered by Noam Chomsky reached the
stage for so-called standard theory in the year 1965, the components syntax is
central components. By using the phrase structure (happy birthday popularly
monster), component syntax mediocre (value addes) structure which represent hidden
meaning sentence. A words like