Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The areas undertaken included Sunam, Dhuri and Sangrur. In these areas various
banks were administered which included CBOP, HDFC, Kotak Mahindra, UTI
and ICICI. Moreover a structured and unbiased questionnaire helped in knowing
customers perception regarding Mutual Funds and personal interviews helped in
customer satisfaction. The data gathered in the above process was analyzed using
statistical methods.
As per the survey the area undertaken by me was unaware about the Mutual Funds
especially of Reliance. The market there was almost captured by UTI only. In this
regard a drive was undertaken for making a place for Reliance Mutual Funds in
the market. By the end this drive was fruitful as during the NFO period (Reliance
Equity Advantage Fund) the business for Reliance Mutual Fund rose to 20 lacs.
Along with this for the existing schemes Reliance showed a great response.
Moreover from these areas agents were empanelled for selling of Reliance Mutual
Funds and hence showed good results. Hence by the end the overall response for
Reliance from these areas grew many folds.
For this, research has been conducted taking the advantage of Primary Data. For
the primary data collection, a presentation was prepared which was shown in
various banks and also to the agents of these areas. In addition to this personal
interviews have also been conducted. All the analysis and findings on the basis of
data collected are provided in the project. The project is being concluded by
conclusion, recommendations and limitations on the basis of learning and analysis
done.
Review of Literature
Introduction
This study examines the performance of 93 fund managers over the 10 year
period 1986 through 1995 using relative percentile ranks based on quarterly
compounded, annual total returns measured against funds with the same
investment objective. On average, managers with 10-year track records at the
same fund do not perform better than managers with shorter track records. Also,
for these experienced managers, superior performance in one-five-year period is
not predictive of superior performance over the next five years. However,
inferior performance persists, particularly for funds with above average expense
ratios.
Conclusion
Two other studies have used performance ranks. Dunn and Theisen (1983) rank
the annual performance of 201 institutional portfolios for the period 1973
through 1982 without controlling for fund risk. They found no evidence that
funds performed within the same quartile over the ten-year period. They also
found that ranks of individual managers based on 5-year compound returns
revealed no consistency. Bauman and Miller (1995) studied the persistence of
pension and investment fund performance by type of investment organization
and investment style. They employed a quartile ranking technique because they
noted that "investors pay particular attention to consultants' and financial
periodicals' investment performance rankings of mutual funds and pension
funds" (Bauman & Miller, 1995, p. 79). They found that portfolios managed by
investment advisors showed more consistent performance (measured by quartile
rankings) over market cycles and that funds managed by banks and insurance
companies showed the least consistency. They suggest that this result may be
caused by a higher turnover in the decision-making structure in these less
consistent funds..
Using relative annual performance ranks, this study finds no evidence that
experienced mutual fund managers outperform their less experienced peers.
Also, the superior relative performance of experienced managers measured over
the five-year period 1986-1990 was not predictive of superior performance over
the subsequent five years. While superior performance is not persistent, there is
evidence that inferior performance does persist. Poorly performing managers
tend to improve their rankings in the next period, but their performance remains
below that of superior managers. One reason for this appears to be differences in
expense ratios. Managers with inferior performance and greater than average
expense ratios during 1986-1990 perform more poorly during 1991-1995 than
funds with below average expense ratios. The results hold after controlling the
systematic risk of the fund and risk exposure related to individual management
styles defined by Morningstar.
The results of this study are consistent with those of Detzel and Weigand (also in
this issue). Using a regression residual approach, they also find no persistence in
fund performance after controlling for investment objective and other common
portfolio factors. Explicit control for investment objective and style category, as
well as longer performance periods, is key facets of the methodologies of our
two studies. Though each employs unique methodologies relative to recent work
in this area, these studies provide further evidence that neither expertise nor past
performance is indicative of future, long-run, superior mutual fund performance.
Acknowledgment: The authors thank Editor Karen Eilers Lahey and the
anonymous referees for their valuable contributions. Thanks also to Qingsheng
Mou and Neil Monaghan for their research assistance and Jim Gilkeson and Stan
Atkinson for their helpful comments. We also appreciate the comments
generated by a presentation to UCF faculty, particularly, Stan Smith, Shawn
Phelps, John Cheney, and Ronnie Clayton.
Mutual Funds Concept
There are many entities involved and the diagram below illustrates the
organizational set up of a mutual fund:
Mutual Funds Industry in India
The origin of mutual fund industry in India is with the introduction of the concept
of mutual fund by UTI in the year 1963. Though the growth was slow, but it
accelerated from the year 1987 when non-UTI players entered the industry.
In the past decade, Indian mutual fund industry had seen a dramatic
imporvements, both qualitywise as well as quantitywise. Before, the monopoly of
the market had seen an ending phase, the Assets Under Management (AUM) was
Rs. 67bn. The private sector entry to the fund family rose the AUM to Rs. 470 bn
in March 1993 and till April 2004, it reached the height of 1,540 bn.
Putting the AUM of the Indian Mutual Funds Industry into comparison, the total
of it is less than the deposits of SBI alone, constitute less than 11% of the total
deposits held by the Indian banking industry.
The main reason of its poor growth is that the mutual fund industry in India is new
in the country. Large sections of Indian investors are yet to be intellectuated with
the concept. Hence, it is the prime responsibility of all mutual fund companies, to
market the product correctly abreast of selling.
The mutual fund industry can be broadly put into four phases according to the
development of the sector. Each phase is briefly described as under.
First Phase - 1964-87
Unit Trust of India (UTI) was established on 1963 by an Act of Parliament. It was
set up by the Reserve Bank of India and functioned under the Regulatory and
administrative control of the Reserve Bank of India. In 1978 UTI was de-linked
from the RBI and the Industrial Development Bank of India (IDBI) took over the
regulatory and administrative control in place of RBI. The first scheme launched
by UTI was Unit Scheme 1964. At the end of 1988 UTI had Rs.6,700 crores of
assets under management.
Entry of non-UTI mutual funds. SBI Mutual Fund was the first followed by
Canbank Mutual Fund (Dec 87), Punjab National Bank Mutual Fund (Aug 89),
Indian Bank Mutual Fund (Nov 89), Bank of India (Jun 90), Bank of Baroda
Mutual Fund (Oct 92). LIC in 1989 and GIC in 1990. The end of 1993 marked
Rs.47,004 as assets under management.
With the entry of private sector funds in 1993, a new era started in the Indian
mutual fund industry, giving the Indian investors a wider choice of fund families.
Also, 1993 was the year in which the first Mutual Fund Regulations came into
being, under which all mutual funds, except UTI were to be registered and
governed. The erstwhile Kothari Pioneer (now merged with Franklin Templeton)
was the first private sector mutual fund registered in July 1993.
The number of mutual fund houses went on increasing, with many foreign mutual
funds setting up funds in India and also the industry has witnessed several mergers
and acquisitions. As at the end of January 2003, there were 33 mutual funds with
total assets of Rs. 1,21,805 crores. The Unit Trust of India with Rs.44,541 crores
of assets under management was way ahead of other mutual funds.
This phase had bitter experience for UTI. It was bifurcated into two separate
entities. One is the Specified Undertaking of the Unit Trust of India with AUM of
Rs.29,835 crores (as on January 2003). The Specified Undertaking of Unit Trust
of India, functioning under an administrator and under the rules framed by
Government of India and does not come under the purview of the Mutual Fund
Regulations.
The second is the UTI Mutual Fund Ltd, sponsored by SBI, PNB, BOB and LIC.
It is registered with SEBI and functions under the Mutual Fund Regulations. With
the bifurcation of the erstwhile UTI which had in March 2000 more than
Rs.76,000 crores of AUM and with the setting up of a UTI Mutual Fund,
conforming to the SEBI Mutual Fund Regulations, and with recent mergers taking
place among different private sector funds, the mutual fund industry has entered
its current phase of consolidation and growth. As at the end of September, 2004,
there were 29 funds, which manage assets of Rs.153108 crores under 421
schemes.
The major players in the Indian Mutual Fund Industry are:
Performance of Mutual Funds in India
Let us start the discussion of the performance of mutual funds in India from the
day the concept of mutual fund took birth in India. The year was 1963. Unit Trust
of India invited investors or rather to those who believed in savings, to park their
money in UTI Mutual Fund.
For 30 years it goaled without a single second player. Though the 1988 year saw
some new mutual fund companies, but UTI remained in a monopoly position.
The performance of mutual funds in India in the initial phase was not even closer
to satisfactory level. People rarely understood, and of course investing was out of
question. But yes, some 24 million shareholders was accustomed with guaranteed
high returns by the begining of liberalization of the industry in 1992. This good
record of UTI became marketing tool for new entrants. The expectations of
investors touched the sky in profitability factor. However, people were miles away
from the praparedness of risks factor after the liberalization.
The Assets Under Management of UTI was Rs. 67bn. by the end of 1987. Let me
concentrate about the performance of mutual funds in India through figures. From
Rs. 67bn. the Assets Under Management rose to Rs. 470 bn. in March 1993 and
the figure had a three times higher performance by April 2004. It rose as high as
Rs. 1,540bn.
The net asset value (NAV) of mutual funds in India declined when stock prices
started falling in the year 1992. Those days, the market regulations did not allow
portfolio shifts into alternative investments. There were rather no choice apart
from holding the cash or to further continue investing in shares. One more thing to
be noted, since only closed-end funds were floated in the market, the investors
disinvested by selling at a loss in the secondary market.
The performance of mutual funds in India suffered qualitatively. The 1992 stock
market scandal, the losses by disinvestments and of course the lack of transparent
rules in the whereabout rocked confidence among the investors. Partly owing to a
relatively weak stock market performance, mutual funds have not yet recovered,
with funds trading at an average discount of 1020 percent of their net asset value.
The measure was taken to make mutual funds the key instrument for long-term
saving. The more the variety offered, the quantitative will be investors.
At last to mention, as long as mutual fund companies are performing with lower
risks and higher profitability within a short span of time, more and more people
will be inclined to invest until and unless they are fully educated with the dos and
donts of mutual funds.
Mutual Fund Companies in India
The concept of mutual funds in India dates back to the year 1963. The era between
1963 and 1987 marked the existance of only one mutual fund company in India
with Rs. 67bn assets under management (AUM), by the end of its monopoly era,
the Unit Trust of India (UTI). By the end of the 80s decade, few other mutual fund
companies in India took their position in mutual fund market.
The new entries of mutual fund companies in India were SBI Mutual Fund,
Canbank Mutual Fund, Punjab National Bank Mutual Fund, Indian Bank Mutual
Fund, Bank of India Mutual Fund.
The succeeding decade showed a new horizon in indian mutual fund industry. By
the end of 1993, the total AUM of the industry was Rs. 470.04 bn. The private
sector funds started penetrating the fund families. In the same year the first Mutual
Fund Regulations came into existance with re-registering all mutual funds except
UTI. The regulations were further given a revised shape in 1996.
Kothari Pioneer was the first private sector mutual fund company in India which
has now merged with Franklin Templeton. Just after ten years with private sector
players penetration, the total assets rose up to Rs. 1218.05 bn. Today there are 33
mutual fund companies in India.
Major Mutual Fund Companies in India
ABN AMRO Mutual Fund was setup on April 15, 2004 with ABN AMRO Trustee
(India) Pvt. Ltd. as the Trustee Company. The AMC, ABN AMRO Asset
Management (India) Ltd. was incorporated on November 4, 2003. Deutsche Bank
A G is the custodian of ABN AMRO Mutual Fund.
Birla Sun Life Mutual Fund is the joint venture of Aditya Birla Group and Sun
Life Financial. Sun Life Financial is a golbal organisation evolved in 1871 and is
being represented in Canada, the US, the Philippines, Japan, Indonesia and
Bermuda apart from India. Birla Sun Life Mutual Fund follows a conservative
long-term approach to investment. Recently it crossed AUM of Rs. 10,000 crores.
Bank of Baroda Mutual Fund or BOB Mutual Fund was setup on October 30,
1992 under the sponsorship of Bank of Baroda. BOB Asset Management
Company Limited is the AMC of BOB Mutual Fund and was incorporated on
November 5, 1992. Deutsche Bank AG is the custodian.
HDFC Mutual Fund
HDFC Mutual Fund was setup on June 30, 2000 with two sponsorers nemely
Housing Development Finance Corporation Limited and Standard Life
Investments Limited.
HSBC Mutual Fund was setup on May 27, 2002 with HSBC Securities and Capital
Markets (India) Private Limited as the sponsor. Board of Trustees, HSBC Mutual
Fund acts as the Trustee Company of HSBC Mutual Fund.
ING Vysya Mutual Fund was setup on February 11, 1999 with the same named
Trustee Company. It is a joint venture of Vysya and ING. The AMC, ING
Investment Management (India) Pvt. Ltd. was incorporated on April 6, 1998.
The mutual fund of ICICI is a joint venture with Prudential Plc. of America, one
of the largest life insurance companies in the US of A. Prudential ICICI Mutual
Fund was setup on 13th of October, 1993 with two sponsorers, Prudential Plc. and
ICICI Ltd. The Trustee Company formed is Prudential ICICI Trust Ltd. and the
AMC is Prudential ICICI Asset Management Company Limited incorporated on
22nd of June, 1993.
Sahara Mutual Fund
Sahara Mutual Fund was set up on July 18, 1996 with Sahara India Financial
Corporation Ltd. as the sponsor. Sahara Asset Management Company Private
Limited incorporated on August 31, 1995 works as the AMC of Sahara Mutual
Fund. The paid-up capital of the AMC stands at Rs 25.8 crore.
State Bank of India Mutual Fund is the first Bank sponsored Mutual Fund to
launch offshor fund, the India Magnum Fund with a corpus of Rs. 225 cr.
approximately. Today it is the largest Bank sponsored Mutual Fund in India. They
have already launched 35 Schemes out of which 15 have already yielded
handsome returns to investors. State Bank of India Mutual Fund has more than Rs.
5,500 Crores as AUM. Now it has an investor base of over 8 Lakhs spread over 18
schemes.
Tata Mutual Fund (TMF) is a Trust under the Indian Trust Act, 1882. The
sponsorers for Tata Mutual Fund are Tata Sons Ltd., and Tata Investment
Corporation Ltd. The investment manager is Tata Asset Management Limited and
its Tata Trustee Company Pvt. Limited. Tata Asset Management Limited's is one
of the fastest in the country with more than Rs. 7,703 crores (as on April 30, 2005)
of AUM.
Kotak Mahindra Mutual Fund
UTI Asset Management Company Private Limited, established in Jan 14, 2003,
manages the UTI Mutual Fund with the support of UTI Trustee Company Privete
Limited. UTI Asset Management Company presently manages a corpus of over
Rs.20000 Crore. The sponsorers of UTI Mutual Fund are Bank of Baroda (BOB),
Punjab National Bank (PNB), State Bank of India (SBI), and Life Insurance
Corporation of India (LIC). The schemes of UTI Mutual Fund are Liquid Funds,
Income Funds, Asset Management Funds, Index Funds, Equity Funds and Balance
Funds.
Reliance Mutual Fund (RMF) was established as trust under Indian Trusts Act,
1882. The sponsor of RMF is Reliance Capital Limited and Reliance Capital
Trustee Co. Limited is the Trustee. It was registered on June 30, 1995 as Reliance
Capital Mutual Fund which was changed on March 11, 2004. Reliance Mutual
Fund was formed for launching of various schemes under which units are issued to
the Public with a view to contribute to the capital market and to provide investors
the opportunities to make investments in diversified securities.
Standard Chartered Mutual Fund was set up on March 13, 2000 sponsored by
Standard Chartered Bank. The Trustee is Standard Chartered Trustee Company
Pvt. Ltd. Standard Chartered Asset Management Company Pvt. Ltd. is the AMC
which was incorporated with SEBI on December 20,1999.
Morgan Stanley is a worldwide financial services company and its leading in the
market in securities, investmenty management and credit services. Morgan Stanley
Investment Management (MISM) was established in the year 1975. It provides
customized asset management services and products to governments, corporations,
pension funds and non-profit organisations. Its services are also extended to high
net worth individuals and retail investors. In India it is known as Morgan Stanley
Investment Management Private Limited (MSIM India) and its AMC is Morgan
Stanley Mutual Fund (MSMF). This is the first close end diversified equity
scheme serving the needs of Indian retail investors focussing on a long-term
capital appreciation.
Escorts Mutual Fund was setup on April 15, 1996 with Excorts Finance Limited as
its sponsor. The Trustee Company is Escorts Investment Trust Limited. Its AMC
was incorporated on December 1, 1995 with the name Escorts Asset Management
Limited.
Alliance Capital Mutual Fund was setup on December 30, 1994 with Alliance
Capital Management Corp. of Delaware (USA) as sponsorer. The Trustee is
ACAM Trust Company Pvt. Ltd. and AMC, the Alliance Capital Asset
Management India (Pvt) Ltd. with the corporate office in Mumbai.
Benchmark Mutual Fund was setup on June 12, 2001 with Niche Financial
Services Pvt. Ltd. as the sponsorer and Benchmark Trustee Company Pvt. Ltd. as
the Trustee Company. Incorporated on October 16, 2000 and headquartered in
Mumbai, Benchmark Asset Management Company Pvt. Ltd. is the AMC.
Canbank Mutual Fund
Canbank Mutual Fund was setup on December 19, 1987 with Canara Bank acting
as the sponsor. Canbank Investment Management Services Ltd. incorporated on
March 2, 1993 is the AMC. The Corporate Office of the AMC is in Mumbai.
Wide variety of Mutual Fund Schemes exist to cater to the needs such as financial
position, risk tolerance and return expectations etc. The table below gives an
overview into the existing types of schemes in the Industry.
BY STRUCTURE
BY INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES
Growth Schemes
Income Schemes
Balanced Schemes
Money Market Schemes
OTHER SCHEMES
Open-ended Funds
An open-end fund is one that is available for subscription all through the year.
These do not have a fixed maturity. Investors can conveniently buy and sell units at
Net Asset Value ("NAV") related prices. The key feature of open-end schemes is
liquidity.
Closed-ended Funds
A closed-end fund has a stipulated maturity period which generally ranging from 3 to
15 years. The fund is open for subscription only during a specified period. Investors
can invest in the scheme at the time of the initial public issue and thereafter they can
buy or sell the units of the scheme on the stock exchanges where they are listed. In
order to provide an exit route to the investors, some close-ended funds give an option
of selling back the units to the Mutual Fund through periodic repurchase at NAV
related prices. SEBI Regulations stipulate that at least one of the two exit routes is
provided to the investor.
Interval Funds
Interval funds combine the features of open-ended and close-ended schemes. They
are open for sale or redemption during pre-determined intervals at NAV related
prices.
BY INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES
Growth Funds
The aim of growth funds is to provide capital appreciation over the medium
to long- term. Such schemes normally invest a majority of their corpus in equities.
It has been proven that returns from stocks, have outperformed most other kind of
investments held over the long term. Growth schemes are ideal for investors
having a long-term outlook seeking growth over a period of time.
Income Funds
The aim of income funds is to provide regular and steady income to investors.
Such schemes generally invest in fixed income securities such as bonds, corporate
debentures and Government securities. Income Funds are ideal for capital stability
and regular income.
Balanced Funds
The aim of balanced funds is to provide both growth and regular income.
Such schemes periodically distribute a part of their earning and invest both in
equities and fixed income securities in the proportion indicated in their offer
documents. In a rising stock market, the NAV of these schemes may not normally
keep pace, or fall equally when the market falls. These are ideal for investors
looking for a combination of income and moderate growth.
Load Funds
A Load Fund is one that charges a commission for entry or exit. That is,
each time you buy or sell units in the fund, a commission will be payable.
Typically entry and exit loads range from 1% to 2%. It could be worth paying the
load, if the fund has a good performance history.
No-Load Funds
A No-Load Fund is one that does not charge a commission for entry or exit.
That is, no commission is payable on purchase or sale of units in the fund. The
advantage of a no load fund is that the entire corpus is put to work.
OTHER SCHEMES
These schemes offer tax rebates to the investors under specific provisions of
the Indian Income Tax laws as the Government offers tax incentives for
investment in specified avenues. Investments made in Equity Linked Savings
Schemes (ELSS) and Pension Schemes are allowed as deduction u/s 88 of the
Income Tax Act, 1961. The Act also provides opportunities to investors to save
capital gains u/s 54EA and 54EB by investing in Mutual Funds, provided the
capital asset has been sold prior to April 1, 2000 and the amount is invested before
September 30, 2000.
Industry Specific Schemes invest only in the industries specified in the offer
document. The investment of these funds is limited to specific industries like
InfoTech, FMCG, Pharmaceuticals etc.
Index Schemes
Index Funds attempt to replicate the performance of a particular index such as the
BSE Sensex or the NSE 50.
Sectoral Schemes
Liquidity: It's easy to get your money out of a mutual fund. Write a check,
make a call, and you've got the cash.
Convenience: You can usually buy mutual fund shares by mail, phone, or
over the Internet.
Low cost: Mutual fund expenses are often no more than 1.5 percent of your
investment. Expenses for Index Funds are less than that, because index
funds are not actively managed. Instead, they automatically buy stock in
companies that are listed on a specific index
Transparency
Flexibility
Choice of schemes
Tax benefits
Well regulated
Drawbacks of Mutual Funds
Mutual funds have their drawbacks and may not be for everyone:
Fees and commissions: All funds charge administrative fees to cover their
day-to-day expenses. Some funds also charge sales commissions or "loads"
to compensate brokers, financial consultants, or financial planners. Even if
you don't use a broker or other financial adviser, you will pay a sales
commission if you buy shares in a Load Fund.
Taxes: During a typical year, most actively managed mutual funds sell
anywhere from 20 to 70 percent of the securities in their portfolios. If your
fund makes a profit on its sales, you will pay taxes on the income you
receive, even if you reinvest the money you made.
Management risk: When you invest in a mutual fund, you depend on the
fund's manager to make the right decisions regarding the fund's portfolio. If
the manager does not perform as well as you had hoped, you might not
make as much money on your investment as you expected. Of course, if
you invest in Index Funds, you forego management risk, because these
funds do not employ managers.
Frequently Used Terms In Mutual Fund
Net Asset Value is the market value of the assets of the scheme minus its
liabilities. The per unit NAV is the net asset value of the scheme divided by the
number of units outstanding on the Valuation Date.
Sale Price
Is the price you pay when you invest in a scheme. Also called Offer Price. It may
include a sales load.
Repurchase Price
Is the price at which a close-ended scheme repurchases its units and it may
include a back-end load. This is also called Bid Price.
Redemption Price
Is the price at which open-ended schemes repurchase their units and close-ended
schemes redeem their units on maturity. Such prices are NAV related.
Sales Load
Is a charge collected by a scheme when it sells the units. Also called, Front-end
load. Schemes that do not charge a load are called No Load schemes.
Is a charge collected by a scheme when it buys back the units from the unit
holders?
RECENT GROWTH OF THE INDUSTRY
The Indian mutual fund industry is one of the fastest growing sectors in the
Indian capital and financial markets. The mutual fund industry in India has seen
dramatic improvements in quantity as well as quality of product and service
offerings in recent years. Mutual funds assets under management grew by 96%
between the end of 1997 and June 2003 and as a result it rose from 8% of GDP to
15%. The industry has grown in size and manages total assets of more than
$30351 million. Of the various sectors, the private sector accounts for nearly 91%
of the resources mobilised showing their overwhelming dominance in the market.
Individuals constitute 98.04% of the total number of investors and contribute US
$12062 million, which is 55.16% of the net assets under management.
The annual composite rate of growth is expected 13.4% during the rest of
the decade. In the last 5 years we have seen annual growth rate of 9%. According
to the current growth rate, by year 2010, mutual fund assets will be double.
Let us discuss with the following table:
Mar-
Month/Year Mar-98 Mar-00 Mar-01 Mar-02 Mar-03 Sep-04 4-Dec
04
Change in
% over last 15 14 13 12 - 18 3
yr
1800000
1600000
1400000
1200000
Deposits 605410 851593 989141
deposits
400000
200000
0
2004 2005 2006 2007
years
Mutual Fund AUMs Growth
Change in %
26 13 12 25 45 9 1
over last yr
160000
140000
120000
100000
MF AUM's
MF AUM's
80000
Change in % over last yr
60000
40000
20000
0
Mar-98 Mar-00 Mar-01 Mar-02 Mar-03 Mar-04 Sep-04 4-Dec
years
Some facts for the growth of mutual funds in India
Number of foreign AMC's are in the que to enter the Indian markets like
Fidelity Investments, US based, with over US$1trillion assets under
management worldwide.
Our saving rate is over 23%, highest in the world. Only channelizing these
savings in mutual funds sector is required.
'B' and 'C' class cities are growing rapidly. Today most of the mutual funds
are concentrating on the 'A' class cities. Soon they will find scope in the
growing cities.
Mutual fund can penetrate rurals like the Indian insurance industry with
simple and limited products.
Mutual fund assets have grown more than twelve-fold from 1980 to mid-1993
and by half in the last two years of that period. Most of this growth has come
from net purchases of fund shares by the public, rather than from price
appreciation, and it has lately reflected a choice by investors to move funds out
of depository institutions. In 1992, the public made net purchases of $206 billion
of mutual fund shares, while making net withdrawals from their deposits at banks
and thrift institutions. In turn, mutual funds supplied about one-fourth of funds
raised by the domestic nonfinancial sectors of the economy last year, while
depository institutions provided only about one-tenth. In short, mutual funds are
now a significant competitor of depository institutions for household savings
and, with more than $1.8 trillion in assets, they are a major source of funds in the
capital markets.
Several factors underlie the recent surge in mutual funds. One is the drop in rates
on deposits--especially short-term deposits--to relatively low levels at a time
when rising stock and bond prices have been generating higher returns. As a
result, households seeking to maintain satisfactory returns on their savings have
been drawn to capital market instruments, especially mutual funds, whose
diversification and liquidity offer advantages over direct investments in
securities. In addition, the benefits of economies of scale in the mutual fund
industry have been shared with investors through a widening array of services
provided by fund families. Finally, many funds have eliminated or substantially
reduced the sales commissions, or loads, they charge to investors.
Corporations with access to the capital markets, including firms with lower credit
ratings, have benefited from the expanded supply of investment dollars
represented by the surge in mutual funds. State and local governments also have
benefited, with inflows to tax-exempt mutual funds running at a record pace
since the end of 1992. Moreover, in recent years, smaller corporations raising
equity through initial public offerings, as well as established firms, have seen
mutual funds purchase a significant portion of the new equity they have sold.
In response to the growth of the funds industry, banks have increased their
participation in the provision of mutual fund services. For example, many banks
sell mutual fund shares to their retail customers and, in some cases, act as an
investment adviser to mutual funds and provide other related services. The
increased involvement of banks has brought attention to their role in the sale of
mutual fund shares, including their responsibility for ensuring that customers are
made aware of the differences between mutual fund shares and insured deposits.
The expanding role of mutual funds has had at least two important implications for
the performance and structure of the financial markets. By offering households
more diversified investment opportunities and corporations a greater market for
their financial instruments, mutual funds have improved the efficiency of financial
intermediation by reducing transaction costs. And as intermediaries competing
with banks and thrift institutions, mutual funds have contributed to the reduction
of the role of these depositories as providers of credit in the intermediation process
and consequently have affected the relationship between money and economic
activity.
Reliance Mutual Fund
Reliance Mutual Fund (RMF) is one of Indias leading Mutual Funds, with
Assets Under Management (AUM) of Rs. 48,828 crore (AUM as on 30th Apr
2007) and an investor base of over 3.1 million.
Reliance Mutual Fund, a part of the Reliance - Anil Dhirubhai Ambani Group,
is one of the fastest growing mutual funds in the country.
RMF offers investors a well-rounded portfolio of products to meet varying
investor requirements and has presence in 115 cities across the country.
Reliance Capital Ltd. is one of Indias leading and fastest growing private sector
financial services companies, and ranks among the top 3 private sector financial
services and banking companies, in terms of net worth.
Reliance Capital Ltd. has interests in asset management, life and general
insurance, private equity and proprietary investments, stock broking and other
financial services.
Reliance Mutual Fund (RMF) has been established as a trust under the Indian
Trusts Act, 1882 with Reliance Capital Limited (RCL), as the Settlor/Sponsor
and Reliance Capital Trustee Co. Limited (RCTCL), as the Trustee.
RMF has been registered with the Securities & Exchange Board of India (SEBI)
vide registration number MF/022/95/1 dated June 30, 1995. The name of
Reliance Capital Mutual Fund has been changed to Reliance Mutual Fund
effective 11th. March 2004 vide SEBI's letter no. IMD/PSP/4958/2004 date
11th. March 2004. Reliance Mutual Fund was formed to launch various
schemes under which units are issued to the Public with a view to contribute to
the capital market and to provide investors the opportunities to make
investments in diversified securities.
The Custodian
Deutsche Bank, AG
The Trustee has appointed Deutsche Bank, AG located at Kodak House, Ground
Floor, 222 Dr. D.N.Road, Mumbai-400 001, as the Custodian of the securities
that are bought and sold under the Scheme. A Custody Agreement has been
entered with Deutsche Bank in accordance with SEBI Regulations. The
Custodian is approved by SEBI under registration no. IN/CUS/003 to act as
Custodian for the Fund. Deutsche Bank AG, the Custodian shall, inter alia:
Provide post-trading and custodial services to the Mutual Fund.
Ensure that the benefits due to the holdings of the Mutual Fund are
recovered and
The Registrar
Trustees
Corporate Office : Express Building, 4th & 6th Floor, 14-'E' - Road, Above
Satkar Hotel, Opp. Churchgate Station, Churchgate, Mumbai 400 020.
The Directors
The Directors of RCTC
Management Team
Board of Directors
Amitabh Chaturvedi
Kanu Doshi
Manu Chadha
Sushil Tripathi
Management Team
President
Vikrant Gugnani
Zonal Heads
Debt/Income Funds
Reliance Income Fund
Reliance Monthly Income Plan
Reliance Fixed Term Scheme
Reliance Gilt Securities Fund
Reliance Liquid Fund
Reliance Medium Term Fund
Reliance Short Term Fund
Reliance Floating Rate Fund
Reliance NRI Income Fund
Reliance Fixed Maturity Fund Series - I
Reliance Fixed Maturity Fund Series - II
Reliance Liquidity Fund
Reliance Regular Savings Fund
Reliance Fixed Tenor Fund
Reliance Fixed Tenor Fund Plan B
Reliance Fixed Horizon Fund Plan A & B
Equity Funds
Reliance Growth Fund
Reliance Vision Fund
NRI Equity Fund
Reliance Index Fund
Reliance Equity Opportunities Fund
Reliance Tax Saver (ELSS) Fund
Reliance Equity Fund
Sector Specific Funds
Reliance Banking Fund
Reliance Diversified Power Sector Fund
Reliance Pharma Fund
Reliance Media & Entertainment Fund
Schemes
Equity/Growth Schemes
The aim of growth funds is to provide capital appreciation over the medium
to long- term. Such schemes normally invest a major part of their corpus in
equities. Such funds have comparatively high risks. These schemes provide
different options to the investors like dividend option, capital appreciation,
etc. and the investors may choose an option depending on their preferences.
The investors must indicate the option in the application form. The mutual
funds also allow the investors to change the options at a later date. Growth
schemes are good for investors having a long-term outlook seeking
appreciation over a period of time
Equity Schemes :
Strategy to be followed
The fund proposes to invest 100% of the net equity investments in line with
the sector ratio of S&P CNX Nifty. The fund will endeavor to replicate the
sector allocation of the S&P CNX Nifty on a monthly basis.
At least 80% of the equity investments will be in S&P CNX Nifty stocks
and the balance exposure in other stocks. This means that investment gamut
will mainly be stocks in S&P CNX Nifty index and to a small extent in
other stocks of belonging to any/all sectors. The fund will also use various
hedging techniques whenever the fund manager considers that there exist
any opportunity to generate additional returns in accordance with SEBI
guidelines.
In a Nutshell Reliance Equity Advantage Fund will be
100% of the net equity investments will be in line with the sector ratio of
S&P CNX Nifty on a monthly basis.
Medium to
Equity and Equity related Securities 70% to 100%
High
Options Available :
Retail Plan
Institutional Plan
Each of the above Plans will have Growth & Dividend Plans respectively as
specified below
Application Amount :
Retail Plan - Rs. 5000 per plan per option and in multiples of Re. 1
thereafter
Institutional Plan - Rs. 5 crore per plan per option and in multiples of Re.
1 thereafter
Retail Plan - Rs. 1000 per plan per option and in the multiples of Re.
1thereafter
Institutional Plan - Rs. 100,000 per plan per option and in the multiples of
Re. 1 thereafter
Load Structure (During the New Fund Offer and continuous offer including SIP)
Entry Load
Exit Load
Retail Plan
The aim of income funds is to provide regular and steady income to investors. Such
schemes generally invest in fixed income securities such as bonds, corporate
debentures, Government securities and money market instruments. Such funds are
less risky compared to equity schemes. These funds are not affected because of
fluctuations in equity markets. However, opportunities of capital appreciation are
also limited in such funds. The NAVs of such funds are affected because of change
in interest rates in the country. If the interest rates fall, NAVs of such funds are
likely to increase in the short run and vice versa. However, long term investors may
not bother about these fluctuations.
These are the funds/schemes which invest in the securities of only those
sectors or industries as specified in the offer documents. e.g.
Pharmaceuticals, Software, Fast Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG),
Petroleum stocks, etc. The returns in these funds are dependent on the
performance of the respective sectors/industries. While these funds may give
higher returns, they are more risky compared to diversified funds. Investors
need to keep a watch on the performance of those sectors/industries and must
exit at an appropriate time. They may also seek advice of an expert.
Innovations at reliance mutual fund
o A continuous process
o Investors in developed countries have more wider choices
Hedge funds
Market neutral funds
International/emerging market funds
Arbitrage funds convertibles arbitrage, merger arbitrage
Commodity funds
Real estate funds
Ethical funds, green funds, shariah compliant funds.etc
o Indian investors deserve more choices too
o Reliance mutual fund would aim to be at the forefront to lead innovation as
it has tried to achieve in the past
Various channels of distribution
Most commonly used channels of distribution in Reliance Mutual Fund are as
follow:-
1. Banks
a. Public Sector Banks
i. Bank of Baroda
ii. UCO Bank
iii. J&K Bank
iv. Corporation Bank
v. Federal bank
vi. Saraswat Co-operative Bank
vii. PNB principal financial planners
viii. Dena Bank
ix. Allahabad bank
x. South Indian Bank
xi. Lakshmi Vilas Bank
xii. The Tamilnadu Mercantile Bank ltd
xiii. Union bank of India
b. Private Sector Banks
i. HDFC Bank ltd.
ii. ICICI Bank
iii. Kotak Mohindra bank
iv. UTI Bank
v. Centurion Bank of Punjab
2. R Money
3. Post Office
4. Karvy
5. India Bulls
Objectives of the study
Research Methodology describes the research procedure. This includes the overall
1. Research Design
a) Primary Data
the project.
Purchase of specific product and customer. Awareness can be studied only through
observing.
b) Secondary data
3. Sampling
b) Sample size
c) Sample unit
32%
68%
Yes No
Interpretation: The evident from above finding showed that out of 100
respondents, 65 % respondent are invest their savings and rest of the
respondent are not invest their saving.
2. Where all do you invest you savings?
Obj:- To know about the awareness of mutual fund industry.
12% 8%
40%
40%
Interpretation: The above figure depict that mostly respondent invest our
saving in Insurance & Govt. Securities i.e. 40%, 12% respondent are invest
in Mutual funds and rest of invest in Shares.
3. Why do you invest in Mutual Fund?
Obj:- To know about the growth rate of Mutual Fund Industry.
10% 10%
20%
60%
20% 20%
16%
44%
Interpretation: The above figure depict that mostly respondent evaluate the
mutual funds schemes for past performance i.e. 44%, 20% respondent in the
basis of NAV and 16% advertisement.
5. In which scheme do you pike to invest?
Obj:- To know about the trend of popular schemes in Mutual Funds.
30%
60%
10%
Interpretation: The above figure depict that 60% respondent growth, 30%
specific, 10% in Balanced.
6. What factors do you consider while investing in any scheme?
Obj:- To know about the factor which are commonly consider at the tie of
investment.
Response %age of respondents
Return 36%
Risk 30%
Tax benefit 30%
Any other 4%
4%
30% 36%
30%
10%
90%
Yes No
Interpretation: The evident from above finding showed that out of 100
respondents, 90% respondent are invest their money in Mutual Fund without
faced any problem
8. Are you aware of SIP?
Obj:- To know about the awareness of SIP Plan.
50% 50%
Yes No
Interpretation: The evident from above finding showed that out of 100
respondents, 50% respondent are awareness of SIP Plan and 50% are not
aware.
9. Tick the most professional Mutual Fund companies according to
you?
Obj:- To know about the awareness of Reliance.
20%
10%
60%
5%
5%
Interpretation: The evident from above finding showed that out of 100
respondents, 60% respondent are awareness UTI Mutual Fund Companies,
20% respondent are aware Franklin, 10% reliance, 5% HDFC & TATA
both.
FINDINGS
Findings
People are not very much aware about the Reliance Mutual Fund.
sector.
Suggestions
Basically in these areas market was captured by UTI but for creating
awareness for Reliance Mutual Fund a drive was undertaken for making its
place in the market and this all was done by meeting officials of various
banks
(viz- ICICI, CBOP, HDFC, UTI and Kotak Mahindra) and agents of these
areas who were dealing in investments.
By the end, this drive was really fruitful as during the NFO period
(Reliance Equity Advantage Fund) the business for Reliance Mutual Fund
in the above mentioned areas rose to 20 lacs. Along with this for the
existing schemes Reliance showed a great response.
Moreover from these areas agents were empanelled for selling of Reliance
Mutual Funds and hence showed good results. Thus the channel grew
stronger with time.
According to the survey more than 60% people invest their savings. People
prefer to invest in insurance sector and govt. securities as compare to the
mutual fund. Only 12% people like to invest in mutual fund. People was
not very much aware about reliance mutual fund. Return potent ional is the
positive point of RMF and people like to invest in RMF.
APPENDIX
Dear Sir/Madam
Share Insurance
Govt. Securities Mutual Fund
If Mutual Fund please proceed
7. Have you ever faced problem while investing money in Mutual Fund?
Yes No
If yes what problem have you faced payment problem
No Control over cast
Procedure Problem
Any other
12. Tick the most professional Mutual Fund companies according to you
UTI TATA
HDFC Reliance
Franklin
BACKGROUND DATA
1. Name ____________________________________________________
2. Sex a) Yes b) No
c) 35-50 d) Above 50
c) Post Graduate
c) Business d) Others
7. Address _________________________________________________
_________________________________________________
_________________________________________________
BOOKS
WEB SITES
www.reliancemutual.com
www.amfiindia.com
www.sherkhan.com
www.moneycontrol.com