You are on page 1of 3

David J.

Harter
Law Offices of David J. Harter
A Professional Corporation F1 i..
13681 Newport Ave., Suite 8-608 E Li
3 Tustin, A 92780 Clerk of the Superior Court
(714) 731-2550
4 (714) 731-2595 fax FEB 1 9 2016
djh@djh-law.com
5
it BRECKENRIDGE
6 Bar Number 162426
7 Attorney for Plaintiff George Sharp
8
9
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
10
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, CENTRAL DIVISION, HALL OF JUSTICE
11
17 GEORGE SHARP; ) Case No.: 37-2013-00048310
)
13 Plaintiff, ) [Assigned for all purposes to the Hon.
) Timothy Taylor Dept. C72]
14 vs. )
)
13 XUMANII; HARBOR ISLAND )
DEVELOPMENT CORP.; RED GIANT ) 1.11444PO6EDI JUDGMENT
16 ENTERTAINMENT, INC.; VUMEE, INC.; )
PUB CRAWL HOLDING, INC.; PAC WEST )
17 EQUITIES, INC.; AM WEST IMAGING, )
INC.; GOFF COPORATION; SWINGPLANE )
18 VENTURES, INC.; WORLD MOTO, INC.; )
TAGLIKEME CORP.; PHARMAGEN, INC.; )
19 DEGROUPA TENNER MORALES MEDIA )
CORP.; VICTORY MARK CORP LTD.; and )
20 DOES 1 to 500, inclusive, )
)
21 Defendants. )
)
22 )
23
24
25 The Court, having reviewed all papers submitted herein on plaintiffs application for a
76 , up against idefendants Vupinee, Irv. thtertech Splutions, Inc. fka mwest Imagin
default ro.ve
14-v.? et, i..4 rt- h 6--tifr`r4- itk d_ril 1- .
_ .5 "t7\In 0 0 Or5r 5
27 Inc. Goff Corporation, and Excelsis`iInvestments, Inc., and good cau appearing thergory,

28 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED:

[P44pe,c,P.411 Judgment
1 Default judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff George Sharp and against Defendants

2 Vumee, Inc., Intertech Solutions, Inc. fka Amwest Imaging, Inc , Goff Corporation, and Excelsis

3 Investments, Inc..
4 Plaintiff George Sharp to recover from Defendant Vumee, Inc. the total amount of

5 $19,700, consisting of statutory damages in the amount of $18,000 and attorney's fees in the

6 amount of $1,700.
7 Plaintiff George Sharp to recover from Defendant Intertech Solutions, Inc. fka Amwest

8 Imaging, Inc. the total amount of $43,220, consisting of statutory damages in the amount of
9 $41,000 and attorney's fees in the amount of $2,220.
10 Plaintiff George Sharp to recover from Goff Corporation the total amount of $57,450,
11 consisting of statutory damages in the amount of $55,000 and attorney's fees in the amount of
12 $2,450.
13 Plaintiff George Sharp to recover from Defendant Excelsis Investments, Inc. the total
14 amount of $19,700, consisting of statutory damages in the amount of $18,000 and attorney's fees
15 in the amount of $1,700.
16
17 Dated:
Hon. Timothy Taylor
18 Judge of the Superior Court
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-2-

[Proposed] Judgment
1 PROOF OF SERVICE - CCP. 1013A, CG 002015.5
2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
3 1, the undersigned, am employed in the County of Orange, State of California. I am over

4 the age of eighteen (18) years and not a party to the within action. My business address is 13681
5 Newport Ave., Suite 8-608, Tustin, CA 92780. My electronic mail address is vickie-

6 djhlaw@hotmail.com .
7 On December 22, 2015,1 served true copies of the foregoing document described as
8 [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT on the interested parties in this action, addressed as follows:
9 BY US MAIL:
10 Vumee, Inc., do Incorp Services, Inc. Intertech Solutions, Inc.
2360 Corporate Circle, Ste. 400 flca Amwest Imaging, Inc.
11 Henderson, NV 89074-7722 6619 N. Scottsdale Rd.
12 Scottsdale, AZ 85250

13 Goff Corporation, do Nevada Commercial Excelsis Investments, Inc.


Registered Agents, LLC 801 W. Bay Drive, #470
14 4231 Dant Blvd. Key Largo, FL 33770
15 Reno, NV 89509-7020
BY U.S. MAIL: The documents were placed in sealed, addressed envelopes on the above
16
date and placed for collection and mailing at my place of business. I am "readily familiar" with
17
the firm's practice of collecting and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice,
18
it would be deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on that same day with postage thereon fully
19
prepaid at Santa Ana, California in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion o
20
the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is
21
more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit.
22
23 (x) (State) I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and

24 correct and that this declaration was executed December 22, 2015.

25
26
27 Victoria Loera

28

-3-

[Proposed] Judgment

You might also like