You are on page 1of 10

NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF STUDY AND RESEARCH IN LAW

Before the

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,

X Place.

PETITION UNDER

SECTION ___ OF THE INCOMETAX ACT, 1961

Petition No. _____/ 2017

--IN THE MATTER OF--

Commissioner of Income Tax PETITIONER

V.

Surya RESPONDANT

Memorandum drawn & filed by the counsel for the Respondent

Shivam Kumar

Roll No. 350

Semester VIII

Section B

Page 1 of 10
NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF STUDY AND RESEARCH IN LAW

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page 2 of 10
NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF STUDY AND RESEARCH IN LAW

LIST OF ABBRIVIATIONS

Page 3 of 10
NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF STUDY AND RESEARCH IN LAW

INDEX OF AUTHORITIES

Page 4 of 10
NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF STUDY AND RESEARCH IN LAW

STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION

Page 5 of 10
NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF STUDY AND RESEARCH IN LAW

STATEMENT OF FACTS

Page 6 of 10
NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF STUDY AND RESEARCH IN LAW

ISSUES RAISED

Page 7 of 10
NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF STUDY AND RESEARCH IN LAW

SUMMARY OF ARGUMENTS

Page 8 of 10
NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF STUDY AND RESEARCH IN LAW

PLEADINGS

Page 9 of 10
NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF STUDY AND RESEARCH IN LAW

PRAYER

Wherefore, in the lights of the facts of the case, issues raised, authorities cited and arguments

presented, The Apex may graciously be pleased to adjudge and declare that:

I. That the present petition is not maintainable and be dismissed with costs

II. That the act of the petitioners is an offence within the meaning of Section 66 of

the IT Act, 2000, and

III. That the Petitioners be liable for punishment or penalty or both.

And/or

Pass any such order that This Court may deem fit.

All of which is submitted

Council for the Prosecution

s/d

Page 10 of 10

You might also like