www.pwc.

com/id

IFRS and Indonesian GAAP (PSAK):

similarities and differences

August 2013
This publication provides a summary of the key
differences between the Indonesian Financial
Accounting Standards (IFAS or PSAK) and the
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)
that are required for annual reporting periods
beginning on 1 January 2013.

This publication does not include the specific

requirements applicable for listed companies as
prescribed by the Capital Market and Financial
Institutions Supervisory Board (Bapepam-LK)1.
Please refer to the other specific publication on this
matter.

This summary is not a substitute for reading

the accounting standards and interpretations
themselves. While every effort has been made
to ensure accuracy, this publication is not
comprehensive and information may have been
omitted which may be relevant to a particular user.

No responsibility for loss to any person acting

or refraining from acting as a result of any
material in this publication can be accepted by
KAP Tanudiredja,Wibisana & Rekan (PwC).
Recipients should not act on the basis of this
publication without seeking professional advice.
No part of this publication may be reproduced
by any method without the prior consent of KAP
Tanudiredja,Wibisana & Rekan

1 Since 31 December 2012, the roles, responsibility and

authority on the supervision of financial services activities

at the capital markets sector, insurance, pension funds,
multifinance, other financial services institutions were
transferred from the Minister of Finance and Capital Market
and Financial Institution Supervisory Board (Bapepam LK) to
the Indonesian Financial Services Authority (OJK).
Foreword
After several major convergence processes during the past three
years, there is now a substantial alignment between PSAK with the
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), issued by the
IASB as at 1 January 2009.

As the convergence process from PSAK to IFRS was performed

on a gradual basis, Indonesia has not yet fully adopted IFRS.
The Accounting Standards Board of the Indonesian Institute of
Accountants is now working to align a few remaining update in
IFRS that have not been adopted to PSAK. As a result, there are still
a number of differences between IFRS and PSAK that are required
for annual reporting periods beginning on 1 January 2013.

This publication is aimed to highlight these key differences and

enable users to better understand in the preparation of the financial
statements under IFRS and PSAK. You may also refer to the other
PwC publication A practical guide to new IFRSs for 2013 to get
further understanding over the new IFRSs. We encourage you to
consult your regular PwC contact should you have any questions or
comments regarding this publication or the implementation of the
new accounting standards.

Eddy Rintis
Assurance Leader
KAP Tanudiredja,Wibisana & Rekan (PwC)
August 2013

IFRS and PSAK differences 2013 1

Comparing IFRS/International Accounting Standards (IAS)
with PSAK

Below are the key comparisons between the PSAK and the IFRS2/IAS required for annual
reporting periods beginning on 1 January 2013.

IFRS PSAK Differences

IFRS 1 First-time - No equivalent IFRS 1 will not be adopted
Adoption of standard as it has been considered or
International included in the transitional
Financial provision in the individual
Reporting standards/interpretations.
Standards
IFRS 2 Share-based PSAK 53 Share-based PSAK 53 is consistent with IFRS
Payment Payment 2 in all significant respects.
IFRS 3 Business PSAK 22 Business Two standards in key principals
Combinations Combinations are the same, however there
are several minor amendments
made to IFRS 3 which have not
been absorbed by PSAK 22.

There is a difference in
measuring non-controlling
interests where IFRS 3 provides
clearer requirements (on
present ownership interests
and entitle their holders to
a proportionate share of the
entitys net assets in the event
of liquidation) which reduces
diversity in the application.

2 IFRS in this publication refers to IFRS including IAS, IFRIC and SIC as issued by IASB as

of 1 January 2009 unless otherwise stated.

2 IFRS and PSAK differences 2013

 IFRS PSAK Differences
IFRS 3 also provides
application guidance on
all share-based payment
transactions that are part
of business combinations,
including unreplaced and
voluntarily replaced share-
based payment awards.
IFRS 4 Insurance PSAK 62 Insurance PSAK 62 is adopted from IFRS
Contracts Contracts 4 except for the requirement
in IFRS 4 to measure the
insurance liabilities on an
undiscounted basis because
this contradicts PSAK 28 and
PSAK 36.

PSAK 28 Accounting for PSAK 28 and 36 act as

Loss Insurance complementary to the
requirement in PSAK 62.

PSAK 36 Accounting for There are no standards in

Life Insurance IFRS/IAS which are equivalent
to PSAK 28 and 36.

IFRS 5 Non-current PSAK 58 Non-current PSAK 58 is consistent with IFRS

Assets Held Assets Held 5 in all significant respects.
for Sale and for Sale and
Discontinued Discontinued
Operations Operations
IFRS 6 Exploration for PSAK 64 Exploration PSAK 64 is consistent with IFRS
and Evaluation and Evaluation 6 in all significant respects.
of Mineral of Mineral
Resources Resources
Mining

PSAK 33 Stripping PSAK 33 provides specific

Activities and guidelines on general mining
Environmental in relation to stripping
Management in activities and environmental
General Mining management activities. There
are no standards in IFRS/IAS
which are equivalent to PSAK
33 and thus this additional
provision may lead to different
accounting treatment.

IFRS and PSAK differences 2013 3

 IFRS PSAK Differences
IFRS 7 Financial PSAK 60 Financial There are several amendments
Instruments: Instruments: being made to IFRS 7 which
Disclosures Disclosures have not been absorbed by
PSAK 60. The main differences
are as follows:

IFRS 7 requires greater

disclosure on transferred
financial assets in
both categories of (a)
transferred assets that
are not derecognised
in their entirety and
(b) transferred assets
that are derecognised
in their entirety. The
second category has more
extensive disclosures
requirements.

Subsequent to 2009,
there are amendments in
2011 to IFRS 7 and IAS
32 effective for financial
statements beginning on
or after 1 January 2013
and 2014, respectively,
which clarify the right
of set-off, the gross
settlement mechanism,
and further disclosure
requirements (i.e.
quantitative information
about recognised financial
instruments that are
offset in the statement
of financial position, as
well as those recognised
financial instruments
that are subject to
master netting or similar
arrangements irrespective
of whether they are offset).
Refer to other PwC firm
publication A practical
guide to new IFRSs for
2013 for further details.

4 IFRS and PSAK differences 2013

 IFRS PSAK Differences
IFRS 8 Operating PSAK 5 Operating PSAK 5 is consistent with IFRS
Segments Segments 8 in all significant respects.
IFRS 9 Financial PSAK 55 IFRS 9 (revised 2010) has not
(revised Instruments adopted from been adopted in Indonesia. For
2010 ) IAS 39, refer to IFRS reporters, it is effective
section below from 1 January 2015 and it can
on IAS 39 and be adopted with immediate
PSAK 55 for effect. IFRS 9 replaces IAS 39.
further details.
This standard includes
guidance on the classification
and measurement of financial
assets and financial liabilities
and the derecognition of
financial instruments.

Refer to other PwC firm

publication A practical guide
to new IFRSs for 2013 for
further details.
IFRS 10 Consolidated PSAK 4 adopted IFRS 10 (2011) has not been
(2011) Financial from IAS 27, adopted in Indonesia. For IFRS
Statements refer to section reporters, it is effective from 1
below on IAS 27 January 2013 and it changes
and PSAK 4 for the definition of control.
further details.
Refer to other PwC firm
publication A practical guide
to new IFRSs for 2013 for
further details.
IFRS 11 Joint PSAK 12 IFRS 11 (2011) has not been
(2011) Arrangements adopted from adopted in Indonesia. For IFRS
IAS 31, refer to reporters, it is effective from
section below 1 January 2013 and it reduces
on IAS 28 and the types of joint arrangements
PSAK 15 for to joint operations and joint
further details. ventures, and prohibits the use
of proportional consolidation.

Refer to other PwC firm

publication A practical guide
to new IFRSs for 2013

IFRS and PSAK differences 2013 5

 IFRS PSAK Differences
IFRS 12 Disclosure of PSAK 4, 12 dan IFRS 12 (2011) has not been
(2011) Interests in 15 adopted adopted in Indonesia. For
Other Entities from IAS 27, 28 IFRS reporters, it is effective
and 31, refer to from 1 January 2013 and it
sections below brings together in one standard
on IAS 27 and the disclosure requirements
PSAK 4; IAS that apply to investments in
28 and PSAK subsidiaries, associates, joint
15; IAS 31 and ventures, structured entities,
PSAK 12. and unconsolidated structured
entities.

Refer to other PwC firm

publication A practical guide
to new IFRSs for 2013 for
further details.
IFRS 13 Fair Value No equivalent IFRS 13 (2011) has not been
(2011) Measurement standard under adopted in Indonesia. For IFRS
PSAK. reporters, it is effective from
1 January 2013 and it covers
fair value measurements and
disclosures.

Refer to other PwC firm

publication A practical guide
to new IFRSs for 2013 for
further details.
IAS 1 Presentation PSAK 1 Presentation PSAK 1 is consistent with IAS
of Financial of Financial 1 in all significant respects,
Statements Statements except for the following:

PSAK 1 defines Indonesian

Financial Accounting
Standards (IFAS)
as consisting of the
Statements of Financial
Accounting Standards,
their interpretations and
financial reporting rules
issued by capital market
authorities. IAS 1 does not
include the latter.

6 IFRS and PSAK differences 2013

IFRS PSAK Differences
Unlike IAS 1, PSAK 1
disallows an entity to use
titles for the financial
statements other than
those used in PSAK 1.
PSAK 1 however allows the
entity to use balance sheets
instead of the statement of
financial position.

Under PSAK 1, where

compliance with the PSAK
would be so misleading
that it would conflict
with the objectives of the
financial statements, an
entity is not allowed to
depart from the relevant
standards; however it
may disclose the fact
that: (a) the application
of those standards would
be misleading and (b)
alternative reporting
basis should be applied to
achieve fair presentation
of financial statements.
IAS 1, under similar
circumstances, allows
for departure from the
prevailing standards.

IFRS and PSAK differences 2013 7

 IFRS PSAK Differences
Subsequent to 2009,
there is an amendment
to IAS 1 (revised 2011)
Presentation of financial
statements which applies
from 1 July 2012. Such
amendment changes the
presentation requirement
of Other Comprehensive
Income (OCI) item. Entities
are required to present
OCI into two separate
groups i.e. items that will
be recycled to profit and
loss in the future and items
that will not be recycled.
Entities that choose to
present OCI items before
tax will be required to
show the amount of tax
related to the two groups
separately. Refer to other
PwC firm publication A
practical guide to new
IFRSs for 2013 for further
details.
IAS 2 Inventories PSAK 14 Inventories PSAK 14 is consistent with IAS
2 in all significant respects.
IAS 7 Statement of PSAK 2 Statement of PSAK 2 is consistent with IAS 7
Cash Flows Cash Flows in all significant respects.
IAS 8 Accounting PSAK 25 Accounting PSAK 25 is consistent with IAS
Policies, Policies, 8 in all significant respects.
Changes in Changes in
Accounting Accounting
Estimates and Estimates and
Errors Errors
IAS 10 Events after PSAK 8 Events after PSAK 8 is consistent with IAS
the Reporting the Reporting 10 in all significant respects,
Period Period except that IAS 10 requires
disclosure in cases where
owners or other parties have
the power to amend financial
statements after issue.
PSAK does not require such
disclosure.

8 IFRS and PSAK differences 2013

 IFRS PSAK Differences
IAS 11 Construction PSAK 34 Construction PSAK 34 is consistent with IAS
Contracts Contracts 11 in all significant respects.
IAS 12 Income Taxes PSAK 46 Income Taxes IAS 12 contains an exception to
the measurement of deferred
tax assets or liabilities arising
on investment property
measured at fair value which
assumed that an investment
property is recovered entirely
through sale.

PSAK 46 regulates several

items that are not covered by
IAS 12, i.e. (a) final income tax
(no deferred tax applicable,
recognition and presentation
of the related final income tax
expense and balance) and (b)
specific rules with regard to tax
assessment letters (mainly on
the recognition of additional
tax expenses/income arising
from the tax examination
letters).
IAS 16 Property, Plant PSAK 16 Fixed Assets PSAK 16 is consistent with IAS
and Equipment 16 in all significant respects.
PSAK 16 provides reference
to ISAK 25 in relation to land
rights.

ISAK 25 still maintains that

ISAK 25 Land Rights land that is held under HGB,
HGU and Hak Pakai rights is
not amortised unless there is
an indication that the renewal
or extension of the rights is
not probable or cannot be
obtained. Costs to obtain those
rights for the first time are
capitalized as fixed assets but
subsequent costs to extend or
renew the rights are recognised
as intangible assets and then
amortised based on paragraph
11 of ISAK 25.

IFRS and PSAK differences 2013 9

 IFRS PSAK Differences
IAS 17 Leases PSAK 30 Leases PSAK 30 is consistent with IAS
17 in all significant respects.
IAS 18 Revenue PSAK 23 Revenue PSAK 23 is consistent with IAS
18 in all significant respects.
IAS 19 Employee PSAK 24 Employee Subsequent to 2009, there is
Benefits Benefits a revision to IAS 19 (revised
2011) Employee Benefits
applicable from 1 January
2013 which had a significant
impact on most entities due
to change in the recognition
and measurement of defined
benefit pensions expenses
and termination benefits,
and the disclosures required.
In particular, actuarial gains
and losses can no longer be
deferred using the corridor
approach.

Refer to other PwC firm

publication A practical guide
to new IFRSs for 2013 for
further details.
IAS 20 Accounting for PSAK 61 Accounting for PSAK 61 is consistent with IAS
Government Government 20 in all significant respects.
Grants and Grants and
Disclosure of Disclosure of
Government Government
Assistance Assistance
IAS 21 The Effects PSAK 10 The Effects PSAK 10 is consistent with IAS
of Changes of Changes 21 in all significant respects.
in Foreign in Foreign
Exchange Rates Exchange Rates
IAS 23 Borrowing PSAK 26 Borrowing PSAK 26 is consistent with IAS
Costs Costs 23 in all significant respects.
IAS 24 Related Party PSAK 7 Related Party PSAK 7 is consistent with IAS
Disclosures Disclosures 24 in all significant respects.
IAS 26 Accounting PSAK 18 Accounting PSAK 18 is consistent with IAS
and Reporting and Reporting 26 in all significant respects.
by Retirement by Retirement
Benefit Plans Benefit Plans

10 IFRS and PSAK differences 2013

 IFRS PSAK Differences
IAS 27 Consolidated PSAK 4 Consolidated PSAK 4 is consistent with IAS
and Separate and Separate 27 in all significant respects,
Financial Financial except that:
Statements Statements
1. Unlike IAS 27, PSAK 4
does not allow a parent
entity to present its
own separate financial
statements as standalone
general purpose financial
statements. PSAK 4
stipulates that the separate
financial statements
have to be presented
as supplementary
information to the
consolidated financial
statements.

2. PSAK 4 does not

provide an exemption
for the parent entity
from consolidating the
financial statements of its
subsidiaries. All parent
entities are required to
present the consolidated
financial statements.
Under IAS 27, such an
exemption exists provided
certain criteria are met.

From 1 January 2013, IAS

27 (revised 2011) Separate
financial statements only
deals with separate financial
statements. Consolidated
financial statements are
covered by IFRS 10 as
described above.

IFRS and PSAK differences 2013 11

 IFRS PSAK Differences
IAS 28 Investments in PSAK 15 Investments in PSAK 15 is consistent with IAS
Associates Associates 28 in all significant respects,
except that under IAS 28,
an entity or an investor is
exempted from applying the
equity method of accounting
for its associates if they meet
certain criteria. In this case,
the investor prepares separate
financial statements as their
only financial statements
and records investments in
associates, either at cost or in
accordance with IAS 39.

From 1 January 2013, IAS 28

(revised 2011) Associates and
joint ventures covers equity
accounting for joint ventures
and associates.
IAS 29 Financial PSAK 63 Financial PSAK 63 is consistent with IAS
Reporting in Reporting in 29 in all significant respects.
Hyperinflation- Hyperinflation-
ary Economies ary Economies
IAS 31 Interests in PSAK 12 Interests in PSAK 12 is consistent with IAS
Joint Ventures Joint Ventures 31 in all significant respects.
But while both PSAK 12 and
IAS 31 allow either the equity
method or the proportionate
consolidation method, PSAK
12 puts more emphasis on the
equity method, whereas IAS 31
recommends the proportionate
consolidation method.
IAS 32 Financial PSAK 50 Financial PSAK 50 is consistent with IAS
Instruments: Instruments: 32 in all significant respects.
Presentation Presentation
IAS 33 Earnings per PSAK 56 Earnings per PSAK 56 is consistent with IAS
Share Share 33 in all significant respects.

12 IFRS and PSAK differences 2013

 IFRS PSAK Differences
IAS 34 Interim PSAK 3 Interim PSAK 3 is consistent with IAS
Financial Financial 34 in all significant respects.
Reporting Reporting
However, under the prevailing
capital market regulations,
listed companies are required
only to report cumulative
year-to-date information (and
related comparatives) for the
Statement of Comprehensive
Income (SoCI) and are not
required to present current
interim period SoCI.
IAS 36 Impairment of PSAK 48 Impairment of PSAK 48 is consistent with IAS
Assets Assets 36 in all significant respects.
IAS 37 Provisions, PSAK 57 Provisions, PSAK 57 is consistent with IAS
Contingent Contingent 37 in all significant respects.
Liabilities and Liabilities and
Contingent Contingent
Assets Assets
IAS 38 Intangible PSAK 19 Intangible PSAK 19 is consistent with IAS
Assets Assets 38 in all significant respects.
IAS 39 Financial PSAK 55 Financial There are several amendments
Instruments: Instruments: being made in the IAS 39
Recognition Recognition which has not been absorbed
and and by PSAK 55.
Measurement Measurement
PSAK 55 is consistent with IAS
39 in all significant respects
except for IAS 39 includes
several amendments with
regard to:

the prohibition of the

reclassification of a hybrid
(combined) contract out
of the fair value through
profit or loss category
when the entity is unable
to separately measure an
embedded derivative;

further clarification on
the scope exemption
to forward contract for
business combination.

IFRS and PSAK differences 2013 13

 IFRS PSAK Differences
IAS 40 Investment PSAK 13 Investment PSAK 13 is consistent with IAS
Property Property 40 in all significant respects.
IAS 41 Agriculture No equivalent IAS 41 will be adopted after
standard under it is revised by the IASB. The
PSAK. IAS 41 model currently is not
considered to be compatible
with the agricultural activities
in Indonesia, most of which
are bearer biological assets.
Unlike IAS 41 that requires the
agriculture to be measured at
fair value, the accounting for
agriculture under PSAK is still
based on historical costs.

14 IFRS and PSAK differences 2013

Comparing the Interpretation of IFRS (IFRIC and SIC)
and Indonesian Interpretation of Financial Accounting
Standards (ISAK)

Below are the key comparisons between the ISAK and the IFRIC Interpretation
(IFRIC)3 required for annual reporting periods beginning on 1 January 2013.

IFRIC / SIC ISAK Differences

IFRIC 1 Changes in Existing ISAK 9 Changes in Existing ISAK 9 is consistent with
Decommissioning, Decommissioning, IFRIC 1 in all significant
Restoration and Restoration and respects.
Similar Liabilities Similar Liabilities
IFRIC 2 Members Shares No equivalent IFRIC 2 is not adopted
in Co-operative interpretation since cooperatives in
Entities and Similar under PSAK. Indonesia do not issue
Instruments shares to its members.
IFRIC 4 Determining ISAK 8 Determining ISAK 8 is consistent with
whether an whether an IFRIC 4 in all significant
Arrangement Arrangement respects.
contains a Lease Contains a Lease
IFRIC 5 Rights to Interests No equivalent IFRIC 5 is not adopted.
arising from interpretation
Decommissioning, under PSAK.
Restoration and
Environmental
Rehabilitation
Funds
IFRIC 6 Liabilities arising No equivalent IFRIC 6 is not adopted.
from Participating interpretation
in a Specific Market under PSAK.
- Waste Electrical
and Electronic
Equipment

3 IFRIC in this publication refers to IFRIC including SIC as issued by IASB as of 1 January

2009 unless otherwise stated.

IFRS and PSAK differences 2013 15

 IFRIC / SIC ISAK Differences
IFRIC 7 Applying the ISAK 19 Applying the ISAK 19 is consistent
Restatement Restatement with IFRIC 7 in all
Approach under Approach under significant respects.
IAS 29 Financial PSAK 63: Financial
Reporting in Reporting in
Hyperinflationary Hyperinflationary
Economies Economies
IFRIC 9 Reassessment ISAK 26 Reassessment ISAK 26 is consistent
of Embedded of Embedded with IFRIC 9 in all
Derivatives Derivatives significant respects.
IFRIC 10 Interim Financial ISAK 17 Interim Financial ISAK 17 is consistent
Reporting and Reporting and with IFRIC 10 in all
Impairment Impairment significant respects.
IFRIC 12 Service Concession ISAK 16 Service Concession ISAK 16 is consistent
Arrangements Arrangements with IFRIC 12 in all
significant respects.
IFRIC 13 Customer Loyalty ISAK 10 Customer Loyalty ISAK 10 is consistent
Programmes Programmes with IFRIC 13 in all
significant respects.
IFRIC 14 IAS 19 - The Limit ISAK 15 PSAK 24 - The There are several
on a Defined Limit on a Defined amendments made in
Benefit Asset, Benefit Asset, the IFRIC 14 which has
Minimum Funding Minimum Funding not been absorbed by
Requirements and Requirements and ISAK 15.
their Interaction their Interaction There are differences
in determining the
economic benefit
available as a reduction
in future contributions
in the condition of
no minimum funding
requirement or with
a minimum funding
requirement.

Under the IFRIC 14,

any surplus arising
from voluntary pre-
payment of minimum
funding contribution in
respect of future service
should be recognised
as an asset when there
is a minimum funding
requirement.

16 IFRS and PSAK differences 2013

 IFRIC / SIC ISAK Differences
IFRIC 15 Agreements for the PSAK 44 Accounting There are differences
Construction of for Real Estate in the accounting for
Real Estate Development real estate development
between PSAK 44 and
IFRIC 15.

PSAK 44 regulates
specific provisions
with regard to revenue
recognition of different
types of real estate
development, cost
components, allowance
allocation and
disclosures.

IFRIC 15 however is a
broader interpretation
of the accounting for
revenue and associated
expenses by entities
that undertake the
construction of real
estate directly or
through subcontractors.
IFRIC 15 addresses
whether the agreement
falls within the scope
of IAS 11 (Construction
Contracts) or IAS 18
(Revenue) and when
the revenue from
the construction of
real estate should be
recognised.

ISAK 21 Agreements for the ISAK 21 is consistent

Construction of with IFRIC 15 in all
Real Estate significant respects.
However, the difference
remains as the effective
date of ISAK 21 is
delayed awaiting the
completion of ED IFRS
on revenue.

IFRS and PSAK differences 2013 17

 IFRIC / SIC ISAK Differences
IFRIC 16 Hedges of a Net ISAK 13 Hedges of a Net ISAK 13 is consistent
Investment in a Investment in a with IFRIC 16 in all
Foreign Operation Foreign Operation significant respects.
IFRIC 17 Distributions of ISAK 11 Distributions of ISAK 11 is consistent
Non-cash Assets to Non-cash Assets to with IFRIC 17 in all
Owners Owners significant respects.
IFRIC 18 Transfers of Assets No equivalent IFRIC 18 has not been
from Customers interpretation adopted in Indonesia.
under PSAK4. For IFRS reporters,
IFRIC 18 has been
applicable since 1 July
2009.

IFRIC 18 addresses the

diversity in practice
that has arisen when
entities account for
assets transferred from
a customer in return for
connection to a network
or ongoing access to
goods or services, or
both.
IFRIC 19 Extinguishing No equivalent IFRIC 19 has not been
Financial Liabilities interpretation adopted in Indonesia.
with Equity under PSAK4. For IFRS reporters, it has
Instruments been applicable since 1
July 2010.

IFRIC 19 addresses the

accounting by an entity
that renegotiates the
terms of a financial
liability and issues
shares to the creditor to
extinguish all or part of
the financial liability.

4 On July 2013, DSAK-IAI has issued new ISAKs which are ISAK 27 and ISAK 28 and will
be effectively applied for period beginning on or after 1 January 2014. Those standards are
adopted from IFRIC 18 and IFRIC 19. Please refer to PwC firm publication A practical guide
to new PSAKs for 2014 for further detail.
18 IFRS and PSAK differences 2012
 IFRIC / SIC ISAK Differences
IFRIC 20 Stripping costs in No equivalent IFRIC 20 has not been
the production interpretation adopted in Indonesia.
phase of a surface under PSAK5. For IFRS reporters, it is
mine effective from 1 January
2013.

IFRIC 20 sets out

the accounting for
overburden waste
removal (stripping)
costs in the production
phase of a mine.
SIC-7 Introduction of the No equivalent SIC 7 is not adopted.
Euro interpretation For IFRS reporters, it is
under PSAK. effective from 1 January
1998.
SIC-10 Government ISAK 18 Government ISAK 18 is consistent
Assistance-No Assistance-No with SIC 10 in all
Specific Relation to Specific Relation to significant respects.
Operating Activities Operating Activities
SIC-12 Consolidation- ISAK 7 Consolidation- ISAK 7 is consistent with
Special Purpose Special Purpose SIC 12 in all significant
Entities Entities respects.
SIC-13 Jointly Controlled ISAK 12 Jointly Controlled ISAK 12 is consistent
Entities-Non- Entities-Non- with SIC 13 in all
Monetary Monetary significant respects.
Contributions by Contributions by
Venturers Venturers
SIC-15 Operating Leases- ISAK 23 Operating Leases- ISAK 23 is consistent
Incentives Incentives with SIC 15 in all
significant respects.
SIC-25 Income Taxes- ISAK 20 Income Taxes- ISAK 20 is consistent
Changes in the Tax Changes in the Tax with SIC 25 in all
Status of an Entity Status of an Entity significant respects.
or its Shareholders or its Shareholders

5 On July 2013, DSAK-IAI has issued new ISAK which is ISAK 29 and will be effectively
applied for period beginning on or after 1 January 2014. The standard is adopted from
IFRIC 20. Please refer to PwC firm publication A practical guide to new PSAKs for 2014
for further detail.
 IFRIC / SIC ISAK Differences
SIC-27 Evaluating the ISAK 24 Evaluating the ISAK 24 is consistent
Substance of Substance of with SIC 27 in all
Transactions Transactions significant respects.
Involving the Legal Involving the Legal
Form of a Lease Form of a Lease
SIC-29 Service Concession ISAK 22 Service Concession ISAK 22 is consistent
Arrangements: Arrangements: with SIC 29 in all
Disclosures Disclosures significant respects.
SIC-31 Revenue-Barter No equivalent SIC-31 is not adopted.
Transactions interpretation
Involving under PSAK.
Advertising
Services
SIC-32 Intangible Assets- ISAK 14 Intangible Assets- ISAK 14 is consistent
Web Site Costs Web Site Costs with SIC 32 in all
significant respects.

There are other specific PSAKs that have no equivalent standards under IFRS i.e.:

PSAK 38: Akuntansi Restrukturisasi Entitas Sepengendali / Accounting for

Restructuring Under Common Control Entities

The objective of this standard is to specify the accounting for restructuring under
common control entities which has not been covered by PSAK 22 Business
Combinations.

A restructuring transaction which occurred within under common control entities is

considered to have no economic substance, despite any legal form transfer between
the entities.

PSAK 45: Pelaporan Keuangan Entitas Nirlaba / Financial Reporting for Non-
Profit Organisations

The objective of this standard is to specify the financial reporting for non-profit
organisations.

20 IFRS and PSAK differences 2013

Authors, contributors,
and reviewers
Djohan Pinnarwan
+62 21 528 91299
djohan.pinnarwan@id.pwc.com

Marcel Irawan
+62 21 528 90486
marcel.irawan@id.pwc.com

For professional accounting advice,

please contact:

Jumadi Anggana
+62 21 528 90990
jumadi.anggana@id.pwc.com

Jasmin Maranan
+62 21 528 90619
jasmin.maranan@id.pwc.com

Ketty Tedja
+62 21 528 90839
ketty.tedja@id.pwc.com

Helen Cuizon
+62 21 528 91463
helen.cuizon@id.pwc.com

IFRS and PSAK differences 2013 21

PwC Indonesia
Plaza 89
Jl. H.R. Rasuna Said Kav. X-7 No.6
Jakarta 12940 - INDONESIA
P.O. Box 2473 JKP 10001
Telp: +62 21 5212901
Fax: +62 21 5290 5555/5290 5050

This content is for general information purposes only, and should not be used as a substitute for
consultation with professional advisors.

2013 KAP Tanudiredja, Wibisana & Rekan. All rights reserved. PwC refers to the Indonesia member
firm, and may sometimes refer to the PwC network. Each member firm is a separate legal entity.
Please see www.pwc.com/structure for further details.