By Marshall 1. Goldman
Sovit Marketing: Distribution ins Controlled Economy
‘Comparative Economie Systems
Soviet Foreign Aid
‘The Soviet Economy: Myth and Reality
-Evology and Economics: Controling Pollution in the 70's
‘The Spoils of Progress: Environmental Pollution in the
Soviet Union
stented Dollars: Doing Business withthe Russians
‘The Enigma of Soviet Petroleum: Half Empty or Half Full?
USSR. in Crisis: The Failure of an Economie System
‘Gorbachev's Challenge: Economic Reform inthe Age, of
High Technology
What Went
Wrong with
Perestroika
MARSHALL I. GOLDMAN
W.-W. NORTON & COMPANY
Now York - LondonTo
Jessica Ann, Samuel Todd, and Jacob Charles
"he eof in ik cmc Ties Homa, with py ta Deiat
‘Wein meen n mance yo on Ct, =
ORE elon ih Pela / Man kin
"BW Neto Compny it 20 Ft rms, Nw aN JOD
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
PRoLocuE—AuGUST 19-24, 1991
‘A Hero Abroad, A Failure at Home
‘The Pre-Gorbacher Era—Trying to Modernize—
‘An Old Story,
Patch and Procrastination —If It's Broke,
Don't Fix It
Mikhail Sergevich Gorbachev Goss to Moscow:
A Learner's Progress
Mid-Course Correction
‘The Effort Collapses
‘The Reaction Comes
‘Where Does the Soviet Union Go from Here?
Epilogue
‘August 26, 1991
EpiLoGus—arrex conancitey
NorrsThe Reaction Comes 173
sale ternver of personel. By March 19677 pra of ie
teak of Polina oreo ies ler ee
‘es and perl oftbe eet f ts Catal Con
tc wo ha ben nove Gear 182 sry ee
‘Brezlinev’s death,
setae id te gM se eres
To ret keen pottery Ruma fone
notes rire pkslony change Rasa
(Ge Seviet Ualen af [ojo ete tong the moet fonerave
sees nthe Wale fo The a atte Sot pone
per vt sere a treaty va
a proatec tn eattsrm preren ctnt
tie eas ta capa cape oe a
ish tama in ai ou
Senta ped a eertirmate er epg tng
Confort wh It Tho Macow Netetan tad otopokea
re let een aoe eee
TE bobbed fgets: Uw popiee aha
Ther no plot in ying to ail e are avy ros te
poopie. 1 yas andy chante of Rat ate
Te pepe clay nace ea
Bey espe om ere
an oe ld Gk ee
The cera presi in Resa cae resin epi
Tinsley area wy eal to oe
oe een SS Garey ed at ae
Soe tat he pics ef the Boe dd aot ee fom
fhe ol of te peo brie, rote parted fn te
pols ond wn pra eas enon Aa Protea Vay
Hage eye ale enteric
feies cote in Castalia“ T open shot eae
a eee ae esac
cree al acinar se soe
Tala ti peat as eR ws ators
ety ae ede ne Name ea
Hee e et ul eoo nega ity)
ce a Lay see hg a eee
The Reaction Comes
eed
ymin tutte ne
sie resus eye
isis ourmnr ety
css et cy
regimen naan
initially how far-reaching Gorbachev's economic and political
conte aie erate oe
‘i oscason, Gorbachev revert mae Fusihermore ti
the se of pats propery: for ample, Gaihe neve
Ear ss or we re
alps td polly tvs Babar cle ty
|, Holo, otal, and economically as well as in terms
of personne!
FE
|
Hint of srctural upheaval actualy date from Andropov's
lection as general secretary, but Andropov seemed mainly
{interested in rooting out corupion and neptess. Gorbachev
‘rondned th ctl ofthese he wanted tied to se
opposed torfor, Between the woof then, there was a whole.174 WHAT WENT WRONG WITH PERESTROM
tive Fores nally began to organize agains perestroika and
snot andothwart Gorbache'sfacreachng reforms What
surprising isthe pasivity with which those opposed to the
reforms ee re a eas
reform proces and the purge of tht like-minded colleagues.
‘The proces of purging Teor opponents andthe Soper
inmate seemed to be 80 easy. After years of taking their
ower and precogatives for granted, they marched of collect
their pensions with no percepible compat. True, unlike the
‘Stalin era, the purged oflesholdrs were not seat of to camps,
cle, oF death; but the spe of the upheaval atleast in terms
ofthe perentag of fired ministers and oblast leader, brought
‘hack memarie of the 1980s pures
‘Sorte ia manage sips. al opstion wis
reform efforts. Some of the newly appointed Sonsevatvs
‘would in time emerge to claim a conservative or antireform
‘mantle. But often as not with time they too would be purged
Some of these laterdy victims, such as Lizachev, would make
‘moce of fuss not only about their ieaiment but also about
theit ideological opposition, but in the early years very few if
ny of those fied from office moved to eiticize perestroika or
snost overtly. There seemed tobe general agreement that the
vit Union could not continue to function as it had during
‘what almost everyone came to age were the “stagnation
"ofthe Brshney ea As on his hosts told Grbac
on a it foCatia i Febrany 1967, "Lie tank i the
Brezhnev regime:™ Moreover,
Sa ett en sak pea. te
tssenaly-non-tbrentening-concops. During my visit (0 U
Soviet Union in those early Gorbachev years there was nary
Aiscouraging word. Nearly all levels of society appeared 10
‘weleome the prospect of change.
‘Gorbaches’s purging efforts were also facilitated by the gen
ral perception that those being purged deserved it. The fact
that economic and political coaditons had fallen to such low
point was not solely Brezhnev’ faut. An unusually large mun-
ber of longserving fers bare a share of the blame for
‘The Reastion Comes W
that decline as well or ad benefited from it Consequently, the
few protests about Gorbachev and his scary ideas were b=
merged bith Jude. public outry ove past incompetence and
thronphot mat ofthe fit wo ya oboe
toe ‘re materings ad wnsend
PSE A ell a othe} oberon. Those
Teeided (rps sib ot ork ax well per
Gliese reece delice eecerd ween
ideologeal,pesona, and practeal Sone feared clo of
focianm by. Gortachev and/or surendr to the United
States ands matric wn. Others wore soot «cle
Taps of th eter anda growth fee tamol There wee
to potest that reforms, tchting Gortacher, vay
nth bck ofthe worker In prt, tee were mtr
ings boat the encilown on th sl of vodka al Te dap
ie bene entey Aor the SS HB gelato
Imposed by Gonpremk
fe ee eae incor axl era
‘were disorganized and often at cross purposes, their rumblings
Teach Gorbachey evoking times some daguctOn oe
‘Gobet wer lhe byte eo facial pa
‘alert aginst hi and his fay? Penile ought
help in dealing with this opposition feom those whom he con-
sidered tobe his natural constituency the press and the intelee-
tual community In an offthezecord meeting on Tune 19,1986,
ies eae omer eerie
particularly resistant to changes Afterall, twas “the apparat
that broke Khrushchev's neck," and Gorbachev feared that his
‘opponents might now use the appara to “break the neck ofthe
ney eadership."” On more than one ocasion he threatened 0
Tle he ot ptt way Onc of hs aed Het
fe prior to the January 1987 meeting ofthe Plenary of the
entra Committ, when he demanded approval of procedural
anges’ The threat was repeated several times thereafter, it~.176 WHAT WENT WRONG WITH FERESTROIKA
nee for vee president, was initially rejected.”
Se eee
gti esha
ee
ene
ee ereeal
=i
Fp itibe, po nord eclar, mes of Garten cat
ae ecm
eae
peg ee eee
ee
icra teen
‘edged publi that his itis refered o im seonfully not a8
the Generalie Sector (General Secretary of the Communist
Party) but a8 the Minerale Secretar (Mineral Water Sece-
tary)” Even though by late 1988 Gorbachev bapan to relax
A kein
The Reaction Comes . Net
out REY recat tae re tte
td sod te podaciy ace ea eee
a ostacer iacee ie ce
eo
Ta pos om Cnet iS a
to Oa tee ees eee
Inbor tis fail ates thse apes a ta work
‘erm On ens ty ren fe poet
: Rare ee ee
ger and workers Wh TREES ood os la.
eee eau oe re
tq ae nay sng ie Spd
Patera ta ipeesact ws a
(ea gaan eae
ee ee
ie tcp si, Ne agssoosons eae
enlace ee ee me
Moe Terrence re
‘open to feed them." In addition, working the night sbiftdis-
Se accctstamernaie cn
“Mine intey tne hee snow ann ee
sit enous mo i mae ea
ca" Tvetaly ink dooce resin ei he
iia ts maton too raat od ein
os ee
“nions and working conditions he reactionarls Sought ae.
‘info the older order and control. Both groups were clearly
‘opposed to any kind of extra work
‘Not surprisingly, similar efforts to revitalize the bareauc
met similar resistance. Any change in leadership potentially
unsettling 0 the party apparatus, New leaders usally bring
with them new conceptions and initiatives, sometimes for the
beter, sometimes forthe wore. Moreover the more serious the
‘xsting situation, the more extensive the resulting bureaucratic
‘upheaval. Yet jus like their counterpart inthe non-communistworld, Soviet appararchiks have also learned to protect then
‘elves From such upheavals. In some cases that means filing
hack on fiend, shiting jobs OF verbally agreeing wih the
‘reforms, but in fet stonewalling in the realistic expectation that
sooner of later the current boy wonder or brainstorm will pass
{st lke those before them. In that way the infrastructure the
apparatus, particularly the bureaucracy, survives all such
changes. There have been of course major discontinstis such
tthe 1917 Revolution and the Stalinist purges, but the durable
Of the Rusan choy (ie cart equivalent oe ape
‘APONETICTGRERT cd earring to those who el
that bureaucracies somehow never die
"Nonethcles, attempting to learn from the allure of Khrush-
chew's reforms, Gorbachev insisted that his efort would be
more extensive and far-reaching. Khrushche's mistake was
that he was not ambitious enough; Gorbachev by contrast
‘ought to encompass all aspects of Soviet if, supposedly mak-
‘ng his reforms irreversible.” That certainly seemed ominous,
and Gorbachev did lite to comfort his intendod targets
Equally unsettling, Gorbachev began to target not just in:
dividuals in bueauerate strongholds like Gosplan, the minis
‘ries, and ultimately the Central Committee of the Party But
threatened the remaining bureaucrats’ confined access to
5 privileges" te pay te
i "YegorLigachev charged thier
sm of special restment for che party fitful was undeserved,
He explained, “The Party worker has one privlege—to be at
‘the font, fo ight forthe Partys policies nd to serve his people
with ith and truth. Believe me, he has no other privileges."
at was nota widely shared view:) And as for pa, Lignchew
rgue that Communist Pasty workers receive a Wage equal to
national average, “It transpires that contrat tothe widely
hold view, party workers rank 26th inthe country as regards
poy—the average pay of a purty worker is 216 rubles per
‘oath For that matter, Lgschev insinted that eric of
most pary workers was even unused during the Brezhnev
rerod. Defending himself before the 19th All Union Commu-
nist Party Conference, Ligachev reminded his low delegates
that ‘daring the years of stagnation I Kived and worked in
Siberia, a harsh landbut a rly wonderful one People often ak
me what I was doing a the time. T answer with pide: Twas
‘building socialism. There were million ike me’ Aprlause’™*
‘Bocas semed to epitomize the bureascacy’s resistance
{eihis effort, Gorbacher seemed pentcalale isinated about
‘what besame known atthe time asthe Chaanow aft. A.
Catanoy was a party member ia difectr of
the Research Instat ofthe Ministry of Elcrcal Engineering
in the Ukrainian city of Chany. is research institute had
developed anew type of machine ool and contra splem that
according to Gorbachev was shown overseas and ws ordered
by foreign and Soviet customers, Homever, the Cherkasy fac-
(ay oe My Ee :
‘SMowpromes tikes sayy Bes wher oo
Senior managers wore an vacation, Chabanov was p=
pointed acting manage ofthe factory. He proceeded immedi
ately to produce his new designs. Upon their return from vaca
tion the repular management reported Chabanov's
unauthorized acts to the ministry and regional party commit
tee. Chabanov was accused of padding his reports and misap-
propriting state funds.” Ministry officals thereupon relieved
‘Chabanov of his duties and set up a special investigation
‘of stice, oficial inthe
IR theo pry apache nontcasroeel with
thir eto expel Cato fom fe Communi Party a
Moccover, whe some of is upperte wrote to compa o
Moncow uthorkssbot the continang abun of tel the
laters woe confiscate i the Chery pont ofl ad ever
"aed ir itended dena: lsingely justice was
elyjustee was done
and Chabaniow remained in the party; but similar resistance ()
bureduraterevaping led Gbrbacev 1 pospone a mesing|
af the Cental Comittee re tmes cate he refs of.
ie rulemaking baie o make the changes he requested. Wi30 WHAT WENT WRONG WITH PERES!
‘ood reason he warned in February 1987 that “the next 1wo
three years willbe the most dificult™ However, Gocbachev
‘orhisasocites were to warn almost every Year that “the next
‘wo or thre years” would be the hardest
un
Finally in 1988, the anti-reformers became emboldened
ec grievances explicit, On March 13, 1988,
day before Gorbachev's scheduled departure for Yugoslavia
and while his ideological al
Mongolia, a 4,500-word “letter” entitled "I Cannot Renounce
Principles” appeared on page 3 of the newspaper Sovetskaia
‘Rosia, ostensibly the oficial government paper of the Russian
Republic. While claiming support for Gorbachev's policies af
peestoika it was in fact a bstring, hated attack on
almost everything Gorbachev stood for.
‘ts author was Nina Andreyeva, a chemist inthe Leningrad
‘Technology Institute. According o a telable report, the pb-
lished leter had the imprint of her husband, Viadimi Klushin
a nstrucor @F Marsa Lennim and 4 part igsione?
‘Although Andréveva insists the word were entirely her, Liga-
‘hey and the editors inked to him may also have hod a hand:
ot only in its publication bat also is content." Giuleto,
CChiess, then the Moscow correspondent for the Italian paper
L°Onit, reported that he saw a drat ofthe article before it was
Published.” He sty that ofthe orginal eighteen pages, onl ve
Gogo nba tay eet a Tis at ee
‘omited-or-heavly edited, Andreyeva does acknowledge that
‘she sent a copy of the letter to Ligachev after it had been
rejected by several other national papers in September 1987."
‘Whether or not be had angthing to do with the atc’
content or its publication, there is substan
hey did everything he could to pub
March 15,
ace of Andreyeva's manifest, Ligachev convened an una
thorized meeting of the leading middle-atsthe-road and con:
The Reetion Comes : 11
servative newspaper editors to impress upon them the signify
cance ofthe Andryeva eter” He intentionally exlided inv
tations tothe liberal editors of Moscow News and Oponpek
Simultaneously the Tass News Agency alerted te subscribers 10
"Andreyera's article and noted them tat they might want to
onside epiting i. This ed othe republication of the etter
in at kat erty thts regional paper incloing many salary
‘bition “Tava pine nthe conservative Bast er.
Ian at-peretoika party pepe, Neues Devochland, ad di
used on Leningrad slevison While Gorbachev wasin Yugo
Slavia, Andreyevas eter and ts mplictions became the foes
‘fa widening ciel of special Communist Party mesg con
‘eed throughout the Soviet Union
or those supporting peresrika and Gorbachey, the An-
vera manifesto was aighteving throwback tothe era of
eee eat at te evel eiteeaiee
eel od ea ipo e el
a the reent growth of nlicparty freedom, flerance for ri
tion, emigration, sexual promcuity, and erie ofthe amy
fd the ary draft. As she saw it tere was ently 00 much
“‘erbiage sbout "terrorism fertsm of anisformers), the
People's political seri, "uninspired social vegetation, “pi
{al slavery" unusual fe and “dominance by bors Ia
power" oesplan the pital, soca, pola, nd enone
“emptine ofthe county since the Bolshevik Revolution. For
those wh bee inthe uniqueness f "the Russian sou” sich
selilagellation ws too much. No wonder her stadets ad
‘equn fo express “istic sentiments" and lose thi “pole
bering”
‘She fv hargs that Stalin was responsible foc he
went of faciam or Hider or the ssssination of Trotsky or
“Kiror Instead of attacking Stalin, the Soviet peopl should
praise him for defending the Soriet Union from Hier nd
Bringing indvstraeation, collectviation, and the cultural
‘volun othe Soe Union, Was this fai to thts wo pave
thai vs forthe Soviet Union in World War Il and. had
reel so ard teeta fe ene oe182 WHAT WENT WRONG WITH FERESTRO!
“ritcims were making the Soviet people question the valve:
‘their own ves. How disgraceful it was when students of univer
sity age had the audacity to ak army heroes from World Wat
ot sbout the great accomplishments ofthe Soviet Army but
‘shout the political repessions within the army, After all
‘Cear Peter the Great, lke Stalin, also had “personal qualities”
that were “disturbing.” Yet today Peter is praised asthe one
who made Russia “a great European power.”
‘Those criticizing the Soviet past were newiy ascendant “lft
wing liberal," she charged, who have “cosmopolitan tenden=
cies” (4 ende word used by Stalin when he attacked the Jews)
land encourage “refuseniks” Jews). They “kowiow ... 1 the
democrat’ charms of contemporary capitalism... ts fal and
supposed achievements.” What, Andreyeva asked, has hape
‘pened to “the class struggle-fand] the leading role ofthe prole-
tariat”” Don't the workers “oppose world capitalism” any
‘are? What about the millions inthe world who are "dying of
Starvation, epidemics and military adventures by imperialists?”
ja noraoundng ie he te nd cota of th
Andreyeva manifesto W response it, particulary
among Soviet intellectuals, With fw exceptions almost every:
fn assumed that the party line had been reversed and that a
‘ew course had boon st over which reformers had litle infi=
fence. As one of my Soviet friends put it, "I had been nervous
shout how far the reform process had gone, Sooner or later I
knew there would bea reaction and a halt. When I learned of
the Andreyens eter, I assumed that this was it and Tacoepted
the consequences, The reform process had been exiting while
it lasted"
‘The ict that her eter had appeared in a major newspaper.
‘ke Sosa Rasta (whic ul Api 186 whe the con
servative Valentin Chikin took over as editor had been one of
the more outspoken papers in favor of reform) and had the
‘undoubted sanction of Yegor Ligachey, the number-svo man
jn the Politburo, was proof enough.” Virtually no one re-
sponded to her. The exception was «thoughtful but relatively
unnoticed eritique in Moscow News." In addition several pa
‘The Reaction Comes
pers, including a major paper in Belorusia, refused t reprint
the Andreyeva declaration, despite some high-level pressure”
Bu hewiingn sea hari theo ose
the pauly of protein support of reform, sugges os”
iw fail Gorbachev's reforms were and how shallow he
foots had ben
or thee weeks there was aloo oficial reset. Fs
aftr his return from Yogoslva an snd considerable tab
tying incuding yet another treat fo resign, Gorbachev was
able to craft a authoritative sponse" Hi intellectual come
‘ade in ams in the Poiburo and the oft responsible for
ideology, Alexander Yakovey, wos assigned to prepare the
erdag ey Ne ete
ff the Plitbro during heat week of March prot
‘iy March 30 to free a showdown.” By eninckence,Ligachev
Ia fora tip to Vologdn” Yakovlev strong reply 35
then delivered to Ponda and che editors in Moscow wee 01d
to publish the anil over the weekend on
‘ch ony increased the ese of doom and pani smang iy
Of the reformers.” Determined to force the sue, Gortah
‘sppretly convened another netig of the Politburo, ad this
time warned that ules there was a vole of conidence fora
continuation ofthe reform proces ad a reprimand foe So
sta Rea Gores gal reign * With hat Yakov
response was Sally pubahed on April, 1988 in Prods
“Princes of Preto ition Nature ot
‘Thinking and. Acting” While acknowledging the need for
lacuson, Yakovlev waroed that Andreyen's eer was not
omstrutve. eatempted ose one gro against athe, ad
{nits continusd defense of Sain, i sought to build on his
axbitrary methods and si aller ost as Sain had.
Furthermore, Yakovlev insite attacks on Stalin did not inva
idateor blxpiteme the serio the Soviet people "Thelves
ofthe Pars, War, and Labor veterans werenot ivan” Never
‘hes, Re argued thse erie i no mean tha there were
te abuaes
wrt the end, Gortachev and Yakovlev prevail. Repocely{he Politburo voted t reprimand Chikin, the editor of Sore
‘Sala Resta an Soetsate Rosia dul reprinted the Prada
atte on Api 6° The Politburo also reprimanded Ligachey
for convening the clr meting th ay afte pen
ofthe Andrejera eter Yeltsin, who was os of the Poi
ty then, ase hat inthe aftermath, Gorbachev and Lise
he sopped speaking to eachother" Nonelces, the con
ronatondemoostraed that depts thee yaro soa and
democratization moat ofthe Coury’ inlets were sll
ly itnatedDemoeacy and due proces wert fragile
‘easplans—
Tt coud be argued that Ligachev and Andreyeve acted
prematurely. Gorbachev was ablein 1988 to deft hl forts
{oa the refnm proces, Moreover, ater te showdown Gore
Sashey moved unt Lace pores, and to Sea.
i rss ofthe Communit Par, he freed
gas int rezement. Pst if Ligachev uh Andeeyeva
A watt anothr yea or two, partly as economic and
pail condns Continued to deteriorate thy might have
been able to maser more support. The acelrating dacontent
‘openly exresied us a year OF soar in large part reflects the
told asertnenest shown bythe antreformer in te 190
None, the ining of Anejo statement deed the
: ‘min of heretofore unfocused opposition to the reform,
Tt ha taken almost thee Jers from the day that
‘Gorbachev had asumed power But once articulated the An-
Areyevn fort aled oer. When asked wy It ook song,
‘Several of my Soviet fends have explained that was not oly
the reluctance ofthese antrformer o challenge Soviet au
shorty ya dinners iy coved the
pay pede erent teen
ess aticulae than the liberal jnteligetsin and reformers,
‘Thote opposed to Gorbachev anu his efarms tended to be
“ong asl" ype ot df etal th fling
Moreover he tally avoided contact wth fosgners, pare
tlrly thse from the West Nor were they always agreement
f
l
‘The Reaction Comes 185
about thir concerns. But Andresen’ sing pub provided
‘eeomrgement end simul fo ete
Subetuenly, Andrey conve fo pote and exer
aly she okt cd in ormalsng Bar (Onl) an cane
‘sks of tended suppers’ UH pach been
Gilt jude tat mny of ts sands and member are abo
thee of Sati Ucn a cones of arin in ne Supreme
Sit ihe Congr of People's Depart was formed
in Febuny 1990, Tey wee ale to rosie S6 vote tthe
iacieeieer ts les Deputies in Desem-
“They were blamed by the supporters of form for
Sieardedec'sresgnsion and Gotacheys eat from bis
meer vase
PAS ceric eh gre tee teeta
lamostscsmied tr nt anatcy, and a perce
iat at eee ee apecoane etal
him dtaring more aad mare fo te rn pt of
it lapis lod tego a
hom soe fi longline flow finer ese
deceit such a RIGENGE? Yekovey td Puan Sher
sive net mice tae enh
‘Fania party fines Hu eln of Goad
sido te Soviet Union reece tha
shit: Ont fey molt carer wil chairman ofthe Svat
Tne Union movenet, Yeayey sll sought generals
cppostion ang the wSEtFio Garbacheys cose ts
{tre He were ofrecer worslopmns oad
bankrupt ihe pees proc wre at hale Even
afer hs leton wa vice present, Yennyevidenttd hinwa
sa apy of te aie fron*
Gorbachers shift id ot par notice! among his oetine
opponents After Sheartnaac' rman, Yager Ligacbey
ita" id ou nti trumpeted that nny of Gort
chev’ propoml sem rts to me now on te sutured
‘sect authori, on he stngiering of aw and ode and
on iprovtg management anf ecmomi n= once bad]
\ ‘Theoretically, Gorbachev should have welcomed the overt
2
186
‘an argument with Gorbachev—a litle less than two years ago.
“He declared thatthe main danger stems fom the conservative
forces. This is wrong.”
ur
manifestation of a conservative opposition. That was fresUn-
ably What democratization and glasnost were all about, Gorba-
che in fact ad atively sought grass-roots involvement and
the questioning of the government processes from bath the let
‘and the right—reformers and anti-reformers. T tion
‘was tha such involvement would uncover and eXpos te ral
feasance of those working against Gorbachev's reform forts.
That wa (fue Wher the criticism Game from those supporting
alusnost and perestroiks. But as the anti-reformers became
they bezan to use the sme opportunities to
ack not only the eforms, but the reformers. This disoriented
least some of the reformers, who saw it not as leptimate
ctitcism but as ingratitude and disloyalty.
‘Even someone like Eduard Shevardnadze, who probably had?
1s much exposure tothe ways of Westen democracies as any-
fone in the reform group around Gorbachev, apparently had
trouble understanding just what a true democratic process en-
Is. In his dramatic De 1990 speech announeing his
esignation as minister most of hs
us Wa on warning about an impending dictatorship and
Gorbachev's tum away from reform, Shevardnadze also com-
plained bitterly, however, about the eiticisms that were being
‘made of him and Gorbachev. Ashe saw it, government officials
ina democracy must be trated with respect. After all they
Werenot just hired hands “Because many people think that the
ministers who st there or the members ofthe government or
the President or someone else are hited they [the eitics} can
do what they want with them. I think that is impermissible.”
Why had no one defended him, Shevardnadze demanded to
know. “Not one person could be found, including the person
The Reaction Comes
in the chair (Gorbachev) who was willing to reply and sy.
simply that this was dishonorable, tht this is not the way, not
‘how things are done in ciiized states [sc]. Why is no one
‘ebafing them?” he asked.
‘As we noted carer, democratization and glasnest can bea
ricky, even painful proces. It i likely t,sHfin not only
“right thinking” but “wrong thinking,” even devant groups
sich as Panyat or Memory. Pomgat is @ perfect example of
‘what so concerned Shevardnadze, This organiation dates back.
to 1978, when several preservationist joined together in an
tffort to protec historical ildings and monuments” Ti
‘twas a non-partisan organization linked to the non-controver~
al All Russian Society forthe Preservation of Historieal and
‘Cultural Monuments (VOOPIK). In late 1987, a rump group,
led by Dmitri Vasile, a charismatic but controversial past
time actor and essayist, managed to seize contro ofthe Moscow
branch of VOOPIK.*"
‘With Pamyar a his forum, Vasilyev and his associates ur
ently sought to broadcast the message that Russia was in
‘trouble because its leaders had fallen under the spell of a Ma
onic Zionist plot. As proof, the etc the fact thatthe Masons
‘use sixpointed stars and that Lenin supposedly had a Jewish
‘grandfather. If further proof were needed, they aso discovered
that Lenin had thee copies ofthe Protocols of the Elders of Zion
in his brary. (This was the faked 1890s French esay con
Itived to show that the Jews were bent on taking over the
‘world Even moreto the point, they noted that Marx was Jew
fd Stalin a fallen unde the influence of Leon Trotsky and
azar Kaganovieh, both Jews, Trotsky, Pama insists, was
responsible forthe fist purge of the peasants and Kaganovich
for the destruction of s0 much of what was old. Moscow.
‘Kaganovich supposedly constructed the Moseow street net-
work in the form ofthe sx-pinted star of David, Several rue
believers noted that the Protocole of the Elders of Zion had
predicted that someone someday would do just that. Moreover,
‘Kaganovich designed the Moscow subway system s0 that “al,
the prinipal transfer stations are located under party and gov
ansither ‘‘ernment institutions. This, insists Vaslyey, made it easy to
blow up all the government organizations and their docs
‘Pamyat also demanded change in the design of the mons
‘ment tothe Soviet victory in World War TI that was being but
‘outside Moseow on Poklonnaia Hil. While others in the Soviet
Union were upset by what they saw asa wasteful expenditure
‘of millions of rubles and the deseration of an environmentally
important ste, Pamyar supporters were incensed by what they
insisted were the use of Masonic and Zionist symbols in the
‘monument Last but not est, they added thei voices to thse
‘rites of Stalin who insist that floding on the site selected by
Stalin for what was to ave been the word’ largest skyseraper
as God's wrath for tearing down the Church of Christ the
Savior. Several splinter groups that spun of from the original
founders, each profesing its own unique version ofthe truth,
Ihave taken even more outlandish stands. In the most extreme
wing of Panu there are some who are opposed to anything
Wester including Christianity. For that reason they alo crite
‘ize Solzhenitsyn and soe the conversion of Kievan Rus (the
‘inth-century original precursor of the modem Russian en
pire) to Christianity as a Zionist plot After all, Jesus was &
ew.
1 Pamyat had restricted itself merely to espousing these
‘eas, it might not be much of a threat, but is members alo
believe in action, Activists wear black shirt and frequently
‘express themselves by beating up those they regard as oppo-
nents?” When one oftheir members was on til they disrupted
court proceedings, and they have also disrupted public and
private meetings. Because it was videotaped and subsequently
shown on Soviet television, the Pumyar raid on the liberal
broke into the meeting, roughed up afew members, nd warned
iat they would return with machine guns. ARer a rather
Stormy and occasionally disrupted rah, the leader ofthe atack,
The Reaction Comes r 199
Konstantin Smirnov-Oxtashvi, was found guilty and sen-
tence 10
So far, however, Pampas threat appears to be more sym-
bolic than actual, Its members can mount demonstrations and
call far pogzoms; their threats have probably done as much to
precipitate the emigration of Soviet Jews as the breakdown of
‘the country’s esonony and the social disorganization. But Pa-
‘myat has been unable 10 win any signieant support atthe
ballot bor. Its candidates have dane poorly in elections. Ri
‘mors that they have fiends in high places (Ligachev was
viewed as a supporter and Yalsin when he was head of the
part i Moscow met with them), and that Panyar isa creation
‘ofthe KOB, jos sis predecesor the Black Hundreds was
puppet of the ezarstseeret police, are hard to verify. The
‘emergence of such deviant fores is prabablys source of embar-
‘assent for Gorbachev, espacial in his dealings with West-
ern leaders, Hut its an unavoidable product of glasnos
v
Given te way odin workers have been expt under
communis, I igh have bee expected ha Soviet workers
wuld have bs in the ero ofthe refrm movement. Tn
the Breiner yes some dents td try wsueser-
{ull 16 etabiSh their own independent unions and demand
tester working and ving conions* In fat 198, almot
tall the coanty cl event oad
tht ow independent unions dead 0 proming e-
ne erm, Dut afteting these examples of spar for
Tt wc ere no avage necessary sgh by Covey
tere efor by other wrk groupe to hal the moe proses
Sime of tie efor were ovis enneaven 67 «80Gb:
Shey burercats and seovomle edna to embarat
Gorbacher and ultimately abort his efforts Others refed
one! ers among workers about the eal possibilty of unen
oymen further explain, and exon impoverishment.rence tothe party ine and linge fo tolerate WOrKME
‘nding condone that woud provoke sks in mest he
sock. Thus, wasnt suring that in he more rela
Paltial condtons evolving out of lamest and demeeraene
on, some meters ofthe otal bor movenent Bese
tnboldened enough to creat thrown ior movenet, What
ws erp, irre wan tia sera of tc oot
‘opp hang Gn msn gs he
ata Rasen Wotkre Prot, was coey elie wth a
‘charismatic rolling-mill operator from the Nizhaii Tagil metal-
Jur canting, Venlanin Yarn” As ono the fo worker
sco hee Chane oles Dap Yarn ca
the country atention wih his cary ouspeanes en will
Ings o erie the Sov economic ten ad i ede
ship.” Ther ae rumor tht Yan's proup (he ico hata)
{va fon forte apparatin” He has dni iat Nevertheless
hea bee gly eral of Gorbeche' elo to teh he
Sit con 1 FHM ote athe SE
‘come thequalities that the market is likely to bring. He has
‘waned, properly so, that sooner or later there will be proposals.
to legalize private property aad ten mo knows, eps
nay berg ard the comme He was also dred ha in
fas open section, wonkr canta ve eed ore tha
Slndiites who re wbtecolar wore and inlet Ia
thepreGorbacher years, worker dh not hate to sujet the
seve to sch competion and thus were assures sizable
Somber of txts Comey Yarn Gand tht col
dates for the Supreme Soviet | eee ee aaa
pice of residence>*-If it had"been adopted, this arrangement
Bul have ubrntcd that candidat picked bythe abot
‘ovement would dominate gave bovis
Fora tine Yaris move seamed fo generate considers
ble ents and support. The ledes ofthe sateen
coaton had been looking for some ay to wroaen tc ase
trong the general population. Geng bck inser, they St
oid to lke page fom the nntoondvern arse
‘The Reaction Comes 11
eared began their organizing efforts by attempting t0 reach
to peasant inthe countryside, The pessats have always
ten romaniiad by Resin intlcialy and twas assumed
that if the peasnts could be moblized by the inlets the
rat of the population would follow: However, he twentieth
Century eft wasnt much more sient than ts strc
tecelen. The pesantsexefly refused to nvove then
{chee in the paca rg Bertaly Yarn an i alin
cari rele tia they could generate ote opposition tothe
{efor movement by corinne ergata rts
ong Soviet workers, here poiical awarenes and dacon-
ts wrote By cpg om he dct fh
Snail woe he mst coc hat Yarn
might eee at a Fact areal, These
erate st et cnr ra ate
7h 198 when Corachy so-ptd Varin ad installed
i era eee ic Free Gounl At
Carpe Yar caters tame ea a more
conveational cannes, Temporal at leat, the United Work
crs Front dono of he fot pass
v
‘Yarin's failure with the peasants notwithstanding, by 1990
political unrest also began to appear in the counteyside: Op-
Wess ony cata fn te nor Inge group of
ates tee coad ca
Union The USSR Pessnt Usion oppots flrs Yo se up
Private a fail fam. La by Vasily Starodubie, a colle
Eve farm dct fom te Tula region, and encouraged by
‘Yeo heh SR a ie, ee ue
mundo up primate colesiean-site frm managers i
acl who ate detcmined to maintain the satan
Tt ot tn 2 pt ob curs nd
sive farms are unprofiahle In ter eyes breaking op
these collectives an converting them int pvt ams wherek
ue, cause enormous hardship forthe members, To the farm
inanaget, and other members in the USSR Peasant Union, his
‘would be a step backward and “deeply reactionary." Given
iE the large collective farms generally were unprofitable,
Ms Peasants would be Tet to fend for themselves would, the
Liga ase that smal a woud be uly tne
le Without support Tom the lager calles of Se
fms, how wold te pena oth lye soe
themselves? Would thy too go hing? For Sling coms
‘is ike Ligne, thw ery This wan nt eee
Whit he had stood for a a sommnis ll thse gear Tp
ect in eu tae
into private and family tum tonne the patina foe
allocated to apiculate Tht wat oly ae Lich ese
erase wuld partly compensate a he Sos
les" which the State the 19300 tok fom the pease
“through low fae prices fragt podice a ede
erg wc ids."
nila sentiments were expres by other members ofthe
USSR Penant Union. In it, bowser the ovring psec
for most of them, parla the fam dora ther
mer members ef the Gosaroprom apparat who dominate
the USSR Peasant Union, wa et far hata breskapofhe
colletve and sate fas would mean an end fo cs mess
Avera power fora tine Gorbache set
szonmi ir etd ot itr the el
landowner Thi restlon wasnt to diferent fe the
‘ay Rist landowners responded when Car Aleandr
‘nounced hi ntendon vo canspte the srs i
vr
| Although they were fewer in number, Soviet manages also
began to organize in ode to pres th vews The dette,
on thea aig pms nd he minders
ordre by span began Tease cho pcre
‘pendenron Gospan othe ipl of manutaatng oes
The Reaction Comes 193
nents. Tn July 1990, for example, mans a
Soviet engineering factories petitioned the goverament 0 reite
Site the central supply and pinning system for raw materi
ls” Production in 1991 would be jeopardize, they warned,
in of powe Yo Gms tod Cog. Les than
Ms ih Hr sn, 50 agen 0
Toputer they et ir ie brntdown tthe all:
tn evel ua th owing try a he ep sa
‘blast level Thy wanted return to cnt ate fr
Seley of op ed "gut of amy hi”
welt retain of sine in the work ples. From
tht itch tothe market was et working
Even IF tere, mot state ees would not Benet bras
thoy were not equipped to seek oUt esfomers or respond
‘tly to cttomer tee Many of thom were prone de
Signd to hadie maove proj with an emp on long:
tem produton run rar th on Bexbly and change
‘The Urea combine Sverlovs with 45,000 enployeesin
‘one fecation, for example, was well suited to mass-produce
Stachne tool, products’ hat ested infeguen mol
‘anges. Walout mins of dlls in (rm crea to
froduze ther cin, Uraimesh otal ised. they
ould be unable fo stat the production feb hat
eae hececee eee mite
Pordvlia,crcbre asi beef wnpreedeind
problem for manages of sac ators In adie, eon
+ Gag Sorie miliary budjet haa devastating impact on cet
A eer
ibe relmash pe ors or tn tether eso prs
fi hi.r198f Mornth e
skup of the Council 6f Mutual Ecoriomic Assistance in Jan-
cary 191 te loupe and obedient pce Son
Tada cup lett Eat Eope per oo ops
blair calomel Ura They arp 0H
Secs a eee ey a eee
er tothe Wester han the Eat
on
{op of everything else, some of the hes and most enter194 WHAT WENT WRONG WITH PERESTKOM
prising Soviet engineers and managers have set of on their own
Lup with cooperatives where the
he room for eretivity greater. To those brought up in the
anni tradition, ths is here. Ie hurts even tore
ners in these new cooperatives devote themselves
‘making consumer goods such spots and pans rather thin
space mises. To an economist, this makes sense ifthe salary
for making pots and pansis higher thn it would be for making
space missiles, Presumably this shows that society places
higher value on consumer goods (Engineers, particularly inthe
Soviet Union, have trouble understanding how making such
trivial products snot a misuse of enginering talent.” In thelr
eye, it would make so much more sense to bring back central
planning where orders are obeyed, machine tools have prior
vere are sured and chaos isa desertion of apitaliam,
vir
ements in the military and the KGB also made similar but
ily more tence DRESS ts sy ot
-—[perestoika. This opposition was expressed. by. Viadimic
‘Kryuchkow, the chairman of the KGB, in a speech to the
Fourth Congress ofthe USSR People's Deputies.” In a throw
back almost fo the days of Stalin, Keyuchkoy launched an
allout assault onthe changes WRBGEI in Soviet domestic and
foreign policy under Gorbachev. He'snota“witeh-hunte,” he
insisted; he is only secking to weed ou the eiminal, dishonest,
subversive, secessionists, and those bent on foreign infiltration
and espionage. The only ones who have benefited from the
‘move (0 the marke, he eserted, are the speculators and black
marketers, These members of the mati have bribed and
ought up the government and the police. Today, the rich are
those who thrive on unearsed incomes. Inthe megane, crime
nd pornography have become major forces in out society. Is
this What we aspire 1? he asked, What happened to socials,
‘morality, to Russian dignity?
The Reaction Comes 195
Tectia Weed ocean shot not
a niles Sve One an he powh of ns and
tiaienes The fet saat ud wpe rp a
ue ts vit tn edly proncon croos
Sparen concen: How em he ROD fe Bed or a
ai cadiee col cae yous oa
teste tenth are) atonal ple eld
{ra coeay pha tne rc Sl or eed dtc
Abt of pute? Yar rena compiz at
(Ells a es tener
‘Saas fbe RGD} nd the Sve mia tal
i i el hn ators nh Bore cons fo
ieee oe Gee cece nea
Sere eensanineran
Saiean is all coterie Ope am ane mate
Tom fren cureny in he aig ou of eh
‘SSRIS Sen The ie cular pelpoble gn Thal on
‘Grol coors Note thr [590,17 maion on
‘of Bi Were sold at the then comparatively low prices. This year
Pie whn picasa cor 11 milion
(opel i posal o pet ot nls tun
rig mate.”= Coming fn Soocoee den ie
Sh seu cpp eu inuing ps foe:
{Slow comment Wh pin a ht i uber of
Ha certo licen] i a
ee nr pte feo Ec
esi aaa tere ieee etd
rclonleace of frugu ory cones smi al
fil eg tep ny atone
Slum eof eS Ce Hew hae
‘were as many as 12"billion rubles in Switzerland alone that
‘onl sae fo deme te Gove? ena cnet
IT Fa umber furor partic” we comming
Pe cee clean aa
pace epeppemsmey
Giving sapee ced nine met ag
SET acter aland wih chal sve”Bie iepemrtnmirores
i
(This i a parclarly sensne mater in the Soviet Union
tects ofexperiece wth food contamination afer Chern
tpl) According to his calculation, 40 percent of he Sov
Unic's imported gran was wnt and 10 pect was
betandard.
f fn indy, Ved espe
sent war being exported tothe Soviet Uaion sted of new,
snd some ofthe orcgn equipment was “ecogcaly.
tction, some ofthe Svier Unio' best minds aod ccc
Gia, Kryuchkor compli wer beng lured ute te
ouniry to work or the Sov Uno sivas At he sane ine
usders were king "oft questionable ides an plana
fn the Soviet Union atte to seve ts problems
ter bight vig
lance agaist economic eines and frig economic niu
YValetn Pav, who replaced Nil! Rydkey a pine ine
ser jiled Hs anony 23,1991, cureney reform y ase
ing ih wae noc a ater f cotton bat § at OF
tetion.” His reform invalidated ality and one hundreds
ble nos n culation and alloved th redempion of no
tore than an amount equal toons monly wage or at mt
{00 rubles Paviov chime, however, tnt he cts ofthe
+ monetary reform were not Soviet citizens but Western bankers
and “ultaradials” determined to “get rid of uncooperative
politcal figures” like “President Gorbachev,” who “has begun
{osstep on someone's toes."" These alleged Western manipala-
{ors were charged with putting up 7-8 billion to buy 140 billion
rubles." Such accusations seem highly fanciful. Anyone puting
up that much money to buy that many rubles even atthe then
highly favorable but illegal exchange rate of 18 rubles to the
dollar must have a serious personality Maw. Yet apparently
‘some investors dd put up some money for that purpose.” Pre-
sumably they were attracted by the favorable rate of exchange,
‘hich was far superior even to the tourist rat of 6 rubles othe
dollar. According 1o the KGB, the originator ofthe plot was
Colin Gibbins, an Englishman who was the head ofthe Dove
‘Trading Company. Nonetheless, it is hard to see what foreign:
‘The Reaction Comes 19;
eee eee
Cae yore aa
‘RRS eating safc een acta
Seater eee
Reape mee
‘words, "Do all the negative features and vices ofthe capitalist
‘market really have to become an automatic part of ou ie?"””
vu
Sin mili. iy coe hare many of rae
sume eon Pre 9D, sch fangs wee tat. Corb
Shev apenred tobe very much in control ofthe itary. Aer
the man eadrhipemberased ial y fling to de
ing Want Gorm, Malin Rita he few asad
vk rom Finland into Red Sure on National
er Guard Day, May 25, 1981, Gortache shook up the
irr kl ry ee car
‘ the wdc of Sri! toms em Aan ea
ty Fabry 15,1989, and made fares ae
svi tie Unie Sieg ti epee of te sale. Sot
{pad ond ran Be Bare at Coy
Stes x cemany pdt cher coun
CORRE Europe renounce TE adherence to communis
i matered ile hat Gortache, aswell as Shevardnadze,
‘ys. as sep 8 anyone atthe sped ofthe collapse ofthe
{Smini ogmes of Eas Eure an the wifeion of|
WHAT WENT WRONG WITIL PERESTKO!
Evidence suggests that Gorbachev’
amany soon ine
ee ee
Fe pals ir oot pend of on tse recon
lence Th cberwOres Corba sought he sary Kid of
CHaipe In Eat Gorman tat he had crenee nthe USE
Unde he sstmption tnt he pte Would be the sare Hg
peste tht the Eat Gera ed other East European Cog
april ren conto ened cage goad
taal Gorbachev mlcalculted, The pools of ater
Esroe, eng thet opportuni, deci to beak witht
commis syste completely. I had ben inposed on them
from the outs by the Sov Union now tht the Sve
‘Union was varia sown truce, the peo
Easter Europe goewsd corel nt 195 eas Ue oat @
taco and Change, Wier sasned ot not Goria
ieee, For that he ee de Nobel Pian Ue Worl’
afflict Bu fortis unt reormer ine Ui Soviet Ue
Sreily among te military, hte coneins amounted
pea at apy ea eee ee
"Tab 1909 thee ws ad ar nal tes
rom eben sect pe ore, te re Ta
ten timed pside down, Intend of pra, eis ow t+
fsck the ary fois savior Afgan, Mess de
ined an ead othe df asthe moc open med ep
there been 15,000 no-comtat ents among ary rater
(per a Woyeer prod. Pustly i epome athe death ta
Parl dis proving cs ain te mie of Saeco
{ald 4200 990, and 35000 goung men fl to
ie teat IC” The nator ral pone alirng fee
CF ke omniancopbica Monumgats othe vty a
‘Word War I wee defend rtm dove In he Bali epu
thas wee made oct of spp of fod, water, heat,
energy 0 Soviet Army bss Inte Chita ola in Fas
Shera clan authori deced not to fd or che the
my vt of resol sot" Ober acs doce that thee
twas nt enough Roving to rlocteoficers andthe fais
‘The Reaction Comes
seing regu from Eater Eorpe Jo sue
tne, et hewn che Poe a te 190 Ta
‘bake uatiers ven worse, delegates othe Congreso Peps
Dos caged tn coe Rees meet oe
feed ae b hon oneal chen of Soi
aera ec apes se a
sie i eee ecko copa
ie eee one eee
‘auger nore fost ecto f Commute or
Noa! Son a tee ote Bale eputl.Thse
es Te a it pop mate up ofan
‘communists, military officers, and Russians, Reacting to the
aie eee ne ieee
"they then demanded the use of military force to restore law and
aca a fe ec
1 easily Sr om fk eee Brena Mee
rina toe ag yi ey ors
eee een er eee oi
| canted yy 05, nara grog seta
fhe Soi Union had waned al tg ed nein
Wort Wer With Cotter and Shrrdnaar' ote
ore Gurung ka beck fe! and ie rig TE
committed itself to withdraw within ye years al its military
‘reed Trom thelr posifors. in Easter Europe. Indeed, i
tae fg Comte ie sind ail
tc wttrey bert endf 1391, Many te Soret aiany
Tey te sel bg Cctocy acd oe’ cre
Date Sars
Tnddon a groving nmi of liar offlera sped
uate eachenge or sppaing Gata domes pa
ie Unie Sats a tne Svc on
wing US pein he Fosn Gall They ony tera
rhe uncomfortable positon of tacking US. inet ol
dc tana Gre baccer ke
Tia aise a Ty he
proper so oop oti en a
sf oes own asin in ner wa"200
Against this backdrop, several gnce timid
began to expres ther frustration publicly. Many jin
the conservative antineform faction within the Congress
People's Deputies, Two ofthe more outspoken crits of Gorba
chev, Lieutenant Colonel Viktor Alksais and Colonel Nikola
Petrushenko, decided to escalate their demands and pressured
forthe resignations of Vadim Bakatin, a liberal reformer who
‘was then serving asthe minister of the interior, and Eduard
‘Shevardnadze. Both men subsequently resigned, with Shevard
sade copllal pey Om Roo ascended Ho
the two colonels boasted that they had toppled Bakatin and
warned that Shevardnadze would be nest”
Tn such a climate, thee was reason to believe rumors ofa
‘coup attempt when to elte regiments of Soviet paratroops
Studenly pened i RedSqace in eal September 1990
ies Bear tale par Socio! nase
‘were their way to pick potatoes (nthe Mak jacket)
for rehearsing forthe November 7 Revolution Day Parade 160
‘months hence were laughable
Thdiations ofthe tensions between Gorbachev and the mili
tary were reveled "s meting on November 13,
{950i one thousand malar personnel” Accounts re
ported that Gorbachev was heckledPand boced ashe tried 10
address their complsints”” Ths coufrotation was followed a
few days later by another meeting between Gorbachev and
rltay personnel who bad en eed a eeptes to vaous
iliamentary or national and re} el ope es Ay
Berry oso tre cag Tar Coal Alton cl
ey ace ad ect voc mat oll
thy sete rr on
‘According o Alsi, Gorbaste i ead Te uPAR
ae pail ei erneresiea
2 Roy nt rig oc a
aed Ee pla io nga agent pede Con
etl al Soret sary pesore! Tv
Some junior ranking officers have formed a union called Shield
(heh) and work within the liberal Interregional Group oP
+ aestinols
‘The Reaction Comes
Deputies in the Congress of People's Deputies to pres forthe
sort of reforms that so upset their superiors. But increasingly
these supporters of reform find themssives on the defensive.
Reflecting the growing climate of distress and bitterness, wo
niltary offers aligned with the more reformist Interregional
Deputies were ordered out of the proceedings of the military
delegation to the Congress of People's Deputies because of
accusations that the Interregional Group was being financed by
the CIA, Dissent in the army can be hazardous.”
BG
Tinian snd hii asf eam
eosin many ways beara rong TsemblAnSe of
“The Stvophies and nationals of the nineteenth entry just
4s tay’ reformers have mich fs cormon with the ine
teenth-entry westrnizes. Concern forthe communal ie of
the peasants fear thatthe Soviet Union wl become western-
ined or ores uriatn of Neer Bebe olsred
cxprosed athe 1990 Congres of the Russian Writes?
Ce tea oe ngs a
HEE" The cat i ferent, but the sentiments are much the
same. As one delegate pat when stacking Alexander Yakoy~
lev, Eduard Shevardondc, and Mikhail Gorbachey, “Some
People may be even woe than the Jewa:"™
‘Ofcourse not everythings an coho ofthe pas. Certainly the
central planing versus marke State a Soviet 0s pre
fevolllonsry mer Bu the complains that Gorbachev end
other reformers ate spending fo much tine in the West a0,
ts Kiyecthov of the KGB nse, felting to eomy en
Senso he ot te il ne A pot ha he
‘errs ar oo then with thi foreign SAS CyB
Sarasa nico oma Popov ity Tie
Fier roacin te Wet Bone rl Ut Sia 1a
Sapan, and Serge Saevich, the vce mayo, traveling from
India to Metco fo Gualall To Gress to the Unied Stat
{ounce Puan to Bien oles Tha tinct96-88 Gorter enpas on Semeraon
|
eg eal ekiptc Tt He bad Ce
‘Werth pte il ow dt th ute ton othe
tcrntey, Weare eolowns dows ra of wh Ute ite
toread tres ope orsign bank socount, Westy a home
nd hin though cur plane for he fue of pent Rossa ™=
Caught betwee thse nreasngly ivergent views, Geebachoy
202 WHAT WENT WRONG WITH PERESTRON
fs evidence oftheir Wester orientation and lack of coma:
ment to the Rusian tration sn sou”
'As the efiem proses began (0 fller, Gorbachev found
sis ie tn nw innceoaty The
*Rformer aking To the West for inspiration steed the
ral
tx move woth market The barista and miliary oer
Sc Tour at Fe tes Urol oy voto woe
Darby thee. pearly conemgel ag tre
‘arch and ema sheen ing dally Tes. To ae
Fecal peas Cte rent ea ore oe Te
Peete ered eal
fees plat aiel eee sic e eee
1 toda cane tnd ed twa thle plces whch ed a
SF dnp tral soe 0 ada ae
Senin i ha been sable
{put foo onthe slits or uit fini dacomet. Disa
i to loge papular suport. By 90,
Fi aoe re bea OE
tv ery th ono 229 nat Decne Ax deci
ty the anny hartner Colonel Petnbenko, “he strogae
no ebght ence the wo camps we haven county he
Se Saber ee
fea edt in mid198 to move Back at Ist pry 0
‘erst
Where Does the Soviet
Union Go from Here?
fit postales and-then glist filed 1 prague he
‘st sesng and spree om the pub
teu he muy ol cance
areas Totes i ean
Hepat tae eae teases ee a
rel oe nctic Whe te ond tine Se
‘evened cou ded 10 sab ‘But none of these
‘nrc SMOSH ERITe Ws neat nre sed
‘more of his passengers ee ae ‘Similarly, ‘a
ieee Gates a
Sov pla sen bas gener more an
‘meaningful seton. Amit the turmoil, Supreme Soviets inthe
oun have become more and moe ke debating rather tn
Jrislatve adi. After tine o one seme to be comp
vith orders from the center Gortacher even tried issuing oF
{ers demanding compliance with his earlier order, but thse
were nore a5 wel
ox hn Ig cn he Sv Unni ad
appreciate jst how dsrintng the Gorbachev years wth all
their cour reves nnd, ane sdation,
ai legate and economic adviser hae own Crate
won ling ea peer sey, Govbchey
rh J