Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PHYSIOLOGICAL EFFECTS
August 2017 Volume 61 Issue 8 e02700-16 Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy aac.asm.org 1
S et al. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
various species within the C. gattii species complex are geographically limited. The
genotypes AFLP4/VGI (or C. gattii) and AFLP6/VGII (or C. deuterogattii) have a global
occurrence, while AFLP5/VGIII (or C. bacillisporus) is limited to the Americas and
genotype AFLP7/VGIV (or C. tetragattii) is limited to sub-Saharan Africa and India.
Clinical cases are also frequently reported from other continents, not only the Americas
and Africa (4, 5). Cryptococcosis is responsible for approximately 624,000 deaths per
year worldwide (6), with a universal geographic distribution, but clinical cases are more
common in the Americas and Africa (7, 8).
The antifungal options for the treatment of cryptococcosis are largely limited to
three agents: amphotericin B, 5-uorocytosine (5-FC), and uconazole (9). The Infec-
tious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) suggests specic recommendations for the
treatment of cryptococcal meningoencephalitis, which can be managed successfully in
the vast majority of patients (10). However, underdeveloped countries such as sub-
Saharan Africa still rely on uconazole monotherapy (11). In this case, high doses of
uconazole are necessary (10, 12). In addition, each of these drugs presents challenges.
Amphotericin B is noted for causing nephrotoxicity and thus is administered only as an
initial therapeutic (13). Renal failure was noted in 30% of the cases in a study of 707
patients receiving deoxycholate amphotericin B therapy (14), while liposomal formu-
lations cannot be used in most developing countries because of cost. Also, 5-FC
resistance is considered common and prevents its use as a monotherapy against
cryptococcosis (15). Fluconazole is used for secondary prophylaxis, but cases of ac-
quired resistance by C. neoformans have been reported, resulting in treatment failures
(1619). Overall, with the current therapeutic options, the mortality rate for the disease
remains unacceptably high, as much as 30% (15, 20).
The thiazole compounds, which possess sulfur and nitrogen, are widely distributed
in natural products and have promising biological activity, representing a class of
substances that attracts great synthetic interest (21). Some studies have reported the
synthesis of new thiazoles with anti-inammatory, antibacterial, anticancer, and anti-
HIV activities (2225). As one of the groups involved in this work, we investigated novel
thiazole heterocyclic compounds, which are easy to synthesize, have antifungal activity
against C. gattii and C. neoformans with MICs ranging from 0.25 to 1.25 g/ml, and
display low cytotoxicity in Vero cells and murine macrophages, presenting 50% inhib-
itory concentrations (IC50s) up to 32 g/ml (26). In that previous study (26), we provided
evidence that the thiazole fungicides 1, 2, 3, and 4 (Fig. 1) are promising compounds
for the development of new drugs for the treatment of cryptococcosis. Building on our
previous ndings, in the present work, we used a library of mutants of C. neoformans
strain H99 that aided in the investigation of mechanisms of fungal inhibition of these
new compounds. The results from these experiments with mutants directed the studies
with oxidative stress.
RESULTS
In this work, we found that our group of investigational thiazole compounds had no
action on the fungal membrane or cell wall (see Fig. S1 to S4 in the supplemental
material). With evidence that the thiazole compounds can inhibit mechanisms found
within multiple fungi, we endeavored to dene the genetic targets of the compounds.
The screening of a library of C. neoformans var. grubii H99 mutants described by Liu et
al. (27) for reduced sensitivity to our investigational compounds revealed that mutants
for the enzymes L-aminoadipate-semialdehyde dehydrogenase, sarcosine oxidase, and
Cu oxidase were resistant to thiazoles (Table 1). Among these strains, the Cu oxidase
mutant was the most resistant to thiazoles, mainly to compounds 1, 2, and 4, gener-
ating MICs greater than 8 the MIC value for the wild type (WT).
To evaluate if these thiazoles could affect any cellular antioxidant system, we tested
the effect of the thiazole compounds against the thioredoxin system, an antioxidant
pathway that was not evaluated in our screen. We investigated the existence of
interactions between these compounds and glutathione, which in C. neoformans (strain
KN99), can function as an antioxidant and complements the thioredoxin system, an
antioxidant mechanism in fungi. If the thioredoxin system were involved, we would
expect glutathione to act as an antagonist to the thiazole compounds. However, the
MIC was not changed by the presence of glutathione, and fractional inhibitory con-
centration (FIC) values were considered to be not different.
Based on the grouping of oxidase mutants that exhibited resistance to the com-
pounds, we quantied reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species
(RNS) from cells exposed to thiazoles to determine if they act through changes to the
antioxidant systems of C. gattii strain L27/01 (or C. deuterogattii) and C. neoformans
ATCC 24067 (or C. deneoformans). Interestingly, we observed a signicant increase in
the amount of intracellular ROS after 1 h of treatment with each the thiazole com-
pounds, but there was only a trend towards an increase in RNS production (Fig. 2).
To better dene the antioxidant systems potentially targeted by the thiazole com-
pounds, we performed a checkerboard assay with compounds 1, 2, 3, and 4 combined
with three oxide stressors and one peroxynitrite sequestrant. We did not observe a
synergy between our investigational compounds and diamide, a thiol oxidizing agent,
or hydrogen peroxide. However, we found that menadione demonstrated synergistic
interactions with the thiazoles, since the FIC values were lower than 0.5 (Table 2). These
interactions suggest that the reductase system targeted by the thiazoles is related to
superoxide production. In addition, there were antagonistic interactions among the
thiazoles and parasulphonatephenyl porphyrinato ferrate III (FeTPPS), a highly reactive
nitrogen species, with FICs greater than 4.0 (Table 3).
Systemic infections of cryptococcosis are treated via intravenous delivery of anti-
fungal compounds. Thus, we examined if our group of investigational compounds
could potentially be delivered into the bloodstream without initiating a hemolytic
effect. We tested serial dilutions of compounds 1, 2, 3, and 4 with 2% human erythro-
cytes and found less than 1% hemolysis (Fig. 3). The 50% lethal concentrations (LC50s)
of the compounds against erythrocytes were higher than 64 g/ml.
DISCUSSION
In an earlier study, we presented the thiazole compounds 1, 2, 3, and 4 as promising
antifungal agents with low toxicity to mammalian Vero and peritoneal macrophage
cells and interesting antifungal activity in vitro against C. neoformans-C. gattii species
complex (26). In this work, we were able to correlate in vitro activity with disturbances
of the fungal antioxidant system.
Among the mutants evaluated, the Cu oxidase mutant was the most resistant to
thiazoles, mainly to compounds 1, 2, and 4, generating MICs greater than 8 the MIC
value for the isogenic wild type (WT). This enzyme is part of a group of multicopper
proteins that is a very important component of the cellular defense that minimizes the
damage caused by ROS (28). There is a wide variety of multicopper proteins that can
be found in plants, fungi, and bacteria, for example, the nitrite reductase, which
catalyzes the reduction of oxygen to water and reduces nitrite to nitric oxide (29, 30).
To observe whether thiazole compounds were actually interfering with the antiox-
idant system, as suggested by the resistance of copper oxidase mutants to thiazoles, we
evaluated the amount of cellular ROS in the cells treated with the thiazole compounds.
We found that thiazoles 1, 2, 3, and 4 promoted a signicant increase in intracellular
ROS, which indicates that these compounds are capable of interfering with the anti-
oxidant system of Cryptococcus spp. The checkerboard assay with oxide stressors
revealed a synergistic interaction between menadione and thiazoles, with increased C.
neoformans (KN99) susceptibility to thiazoles in the presence of menadione. However,
the combination of thiazoles with diamide, a thiol oxidizing agent, and hydrogen
peroxide had no effect, suggesting that oxidative stress is not caused by an accumu-
lation of oxides and peroxides. Menadione is able to generate superoxide (31, 32), and
TABLE 2 FIC indices for thiazole compound combinations against C. neoformans KN99
FIC index with:
Compound Glutathione Diamide Menadione Hydrogen peroxide
1 3 1.125 0.1874 1
2 3 0.74 0.3024 0.5156
3 3 1.125 0.25 1.0156
4 2 1.125 0.25 1
the synergism may indicate that the thiazoles lead to superoxide accumulation inside
the cell, culminating in yeast death.
Additionally, we sought to determine if there was synergy with RNS by testing
peroxynitrite, a highly reactive nitrogen species formed from the reaction of nitric oxide
(NO) and superoxide, and FeTPPS, a ferric porphyrin complex that causes the decom-
position of peroxynitrite by catalytic isomerization to produce nitrate both in vitro and
in vivo. We observe that when FeTPPS sequestered peroxynitrite, Cryptococcus yeasts
were more resistant to thiazoles. Thus, a relationship could exist between the accumu-
lation of superoxide and peroxynitrite production, culminating in fungal death. Similar
to our results, Ferreira et al. (33) demonstrated that amphotericin B causes lipid
peroxidation in C. gattii cells through a greatly enhanced production of oxidative and
nitrosative radicals with increased peroxidase activity. Those authors also observed that
antifungals in combination with FeTPPS results in an antagonistic interaction, which
conrmed the importance of peroxynitrite in the activity of amphotericin B.
Thorpe et al. (28) indicated that superoxide anions play a protective role in stress
caused by hydrogen peroxide to a certain extent, because the oxidative stress caused
by both radicals is lethal to the cell. Thus, there is a possibility that the high concen-
tration of superoxide protects against the action of hydrogen peroxide. This would
explain the result found by our group, where there is an antagonistic interaction
between these thiazoles and amphotericin B against various isolates of C. neoformans
and C. gattii (Table 4) (26). Some studies have demonstrated that amphotericin B, in
addition to the action on the membrane ergosterol, also acts by promoting an increase
in intracellular H2O2 and lipid peroxidation, which helps the fungicide action of this
drug and prevents the emergence of resistant organisms (33, 34).
Another example that shows the involvement of hydrogen peroxide in the antifun-
gal activity of amphotericin occurs with Aspergillus terreus, where it plays a role in the
intrinsic resistance to amphotericin B, related to its high activity as a catalase that
FIG 3 Evaluation of the toxicity of thiazole compounds in human erythrocytes. (A) Picture showing wells
with total hemolysis caused by treatment with Triton X-100 and the absence of hemolysis after treatment
with thiazoles. (B) Percentages of hemolysis of human erythrocytes treated with thiazoles and Triton
X-100. Results are from two independent experiments performed in triplicates.
detoxies hydrogen peroxide and transforms it into water and O2 (35). The catalase is
one of the main tools of the eukaryotic antioxidant system, which also includes
superoxide dismutase, peroxidase, glutathione peroxidases, peroxiredoxins, and the
glutathione and thioredoxin systems (36, 37).
Although the compounds cause the accumulation of ROS, a state that can trigger
apoptosis and be lethal, they did not adversely affect red blood cells at the tested
concentrations. Our evaluation with human erythrocytes showed that thiazole com-
pounds 1, 2, 3, and 4 are not hemolytic, which in principle, enables the intravenous
administration of these compounds. Previously, our group showed that these com-
pounds also do not exhibit toxicity against murine macrophages and Vero cells (26),
providing further evidence that they do not exhibit mammalian toxicity.
In conclusion, in this work, we showed that the action of thiazole compounds 1, 2,
3, and 4 is related to the interference in the antioxidant system; however, the thiazoles
do not target thioredoxin reductase. It is also suggested that oxidative stress may be
primarily related to the accumulation of superoxide radicals and that, perhaps, copper
oxidase may be a superoxide scavenger.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Supplemental material for this article may be found at https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC
.02700-16.
SUPPLEMENTAL FILE 1, PDF le, 0.3 MB.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Funding was provided by a grant to B.B.F. and E.M. from the Brown/Brazil Initiative.
This work was also supported by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento e Tecnolgico
(CNPq), Fundao de Amparo Pesquisa Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG), Coordena-
o de Aperfeioamento de Pessoal de Nvel Superior (CAPES), and Pr-Reitoria de
Pesquisa da UFMG.
We declare no conict of interest.
REFERENCES
1. De Jesus M, Nicola AM, Frases S, Lee IR, Mieses S, Casadevall A. 2009. of cryptococcal disease. Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin
Galactoxylomannan-mediated immunological paralysis results from spe- Infect Dis 30:710 718. https://doi.org/10.1086/313757.
cic B cell depletion in the context of widespread immune system 3. Huston SM, Mody CH. 2009. Cryptococcosis: an emerging respiratory
damage. J Immunol 183:38853894. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol mycosis. Clin Chest Med 30:253264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccm.2009
.0900449. .02.006.
2. Saag MS, Graybill RJ, Larsen RA, Pappas PG, Perfect JR, Powderly WG, 4. Cogliati M, Zamrova RR, Tortorano AM, Viviani MA, Fimua Cryptococ-
Sobel JD, Dismukes WE. 2000. Practice guidelines for the management cosis Network. 2013. Molecular epidemiology of Italian clinical Crypto-