Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Summary
It was during 1374, that the English Church and the Crown had
legal recourse to resolve certain legal question of authority
between Church and State. The Crown hired Wyclif, as a biblical
scholar,to present his scholarly research findings on the question
at hand. Wycliffe submitted his scholarship supporting the legal
positions of the English Crown's authority. When judgement was
rendered, the Crown prevailed in its legal position over the
Church.
The legal decision found in favor of the Crown, did not endear
Wycliffe to the Church, or to his superiors of the Oxford
University administration. Wyclif would became known for certain
of his antiecclesiastical positions based on his research, as a
supporter of certain legal positions held by the Crown. His critics
call him the "King's Man". These legal positions often found
support with the civil authorities and in the public opinion.
Wyclif's work for the Crown was not favorable to the Church and
its authority, he won him little favor from the Church
administration, or amongst its local bishops. His own status at
Oxford University was directly influenced by the Church
authorities that might terminate his position. Wyclif was able to
garner a certain amount personal protection from his association
with the Royal Household under Richard II.
By 1380, Wyclif had started to publish copies of his own texts not
in Latin, the language of scholars, but rather in English. This was
a very novel approach in 1380. His works openly questioned
various aspects of the Church, and its clergy "for form over
substance". His opinions were now available to any who might
read standard English not just limited to the university scholars.
Some of the current Church authorities had serious misgiving
about making these text available to other than academics, and
scholars.
In 1381 Wyclif had begun his own translation of the Vulgate Bible
from the Latin into the English language while he was housed at
Queens College, Oxford. He translated large sections of the Old
Testament, and the Gospels.Nicholas of Hereford (d. 1420?) was a
close friend and university colleagues who helped Wyclif with
some of his translations, and other works. John Purvey (ca. 1353
ca. 1428) a close associate of Wyclif at Oxford helped to
completed the translation of the Bible for publication in 1388.
Wyclif was quite vocal in his own scholarly criticism of the what
he was as the current abuses of the Church based on his own
scriptural research. He was unwilling to tone down his rhetoric, or
take the politically correct positions. His writing on the Eucharist
were condemned by the University authorities, and by the English
Church which formed the basis of his fall from grace.
Wycliffe began to lose his support among the English nobility with
his writings, especially regarding the Eucharist. Sir John of Gaunt
(13401399) an early supporter of some of Wycliff view's on
church wealth might not wish to breach any hint of a possible visit
from the Church authorities. The Peasant's Uprising of 1381 also
had its impact on the nation at large. Wyclif was himself
surprisingly left unassailed during this period of condemnation
probably due to his own Royal patronage during this period.
Lollards or Wycliffites
Groups of lay preachers or mummers strolled the English
countryside ca. 13821409. They preached a new reformed
Christian doctrine based on the scholarly writings of John Wyclif,
D.D. Lollards promoted the reading of the Holy Scripture in the
vernacular as the means for knowing the true Word of God.
Personal faith, and Divine elections were common central issues.
Lollards also promoted the equality of the sexes including women
preachers.
The term Lollard came into general usage by 1387, and may been
used as early as 1382. The word Lollard may possibly come from
the Dutch word for mumble"Lollaert". They were also sometimes
known as Wycliffites.
The Lollard Bible was soon banned in 1407. These became prized
family treasures for Lollards. Many prominent Lollards especially
any former Oxford associates were arrested, or sent to prison.
John Purvey was arrested in 1390 and sent to prison. He recanted
in 1410, and took a parish appointment. He resigned his parish in
1413 and returned to the former Lollard cause.
Oldcastle was finally tracked down with his last good fight. He
was captured, and quickly taken to London. He was sentenced to
death at Saint Gile's Field. He was hanged,and burned at the
same time. There was a question at the time if he was still alive
during the burning, or not? Oldcastle is often called the last
martyr of Lollardy.
The term "Known Men" has been used to describe Lollards of this
period. During Christmastide in 1550 a group of individuals were
arrested at a conventicle at Bocking (Essex). Among these were
Henry Hart, a known Lollard. Members of this group came to be
known as "Freewillers" a possible offshoot of Lollardy. As late as
1555, a man from York was prosecuted as a Lollard. [Editor Note:
Freewill Men section]
Primary Sources
______, [Another ed.] (1729) [18th Century; reel 3127, no. 03]
[ESTCT94131]
______, De Apostasia
______, The English Works of Wyclif Hitherto Unprinted Matthew,
F.D. (ed.) (1880)
______, ()
Secondary Sources
Gairdner, J., History of the Life and Reign of Richard the Third
(1898)
Gilpin, W., The lives of John Wycliff and of the most eminent of
his disciples; Lord Cobham, John Huss, Jerome of Prague, and
Zisca (1756)
______, "The Lady and the Bailiff: Lollardy Among the Gentry in
Yorkist and Early Tudor England", In Lollardy and the Gentry in
the Late Middle Ages, Aston, M., and Richmond, C. (eds.) (1997)
Kras, P., "Hussitism and the Polish Nobility", InLollardy and "the
Gentry in the Late Middle Ages, Aston, M., and Richmond, C.
(eds.) (1997)
McNiven, P., Heresy and Politics in the Reign of Henry IV: The
Burning of John Badby (1987)
Powell, E., and Trevelyan, G.M., The Peasants' Rising and Lollards
(1899)