Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Equations and Example Benchmark Calculations Within The Aspenone Engineering Safety Analysis Environment
Equations and Example Benchmark Calculations Within The Aspenone Engineering Safety Analysis Environment
This white paper contains hand calculations for two-phase orifice sizing and vapor noise and reaction forces inside the
Safety Analysis Environment, helping you to validate the calculations of this tool within Aspen HYSYS.
! !
Eq. 1 = 9 1 = 9 1
! !
In the equation above, is the Omega parameter, v0 and v9 are specific volumes at upstream and 90% conditions,
respectively, and 0 and 9 are density at upstream and 90% conditions, respectively.
! !!.!"#$%!!.!"#$%& !" !
Eq. 2 ! = 1 + 1.0446 0.0093431 !!.!"#"$
!
Eq. 3 ! = ! !
In the equation above, c is the critical pressure ratio, Pc is the pressure corresponding to critical flow
at the nozzle throat in the relief valve in absolute units, Pa is the total back pressure at the outlet of
the valve in absolute units, and P0 is the upstream relief pressure in absolute units.
If c exceeds a, then the flow through the relief valve is critical, and the following equation should be
used to calculate the maximum mass flux, where G is the maximum mass flux through the valve in
lb/s-ft or kg/s-m, P0 is in psia or Pa, v0 is in ft/lb or m/kg, and 0 is in lb/ft or kg/m. C1 = 68.09
in U.S. customary units, or 1.0 in SI units.
If c does not exceed a, then the flow through the relief valve is subcritical, and the following
equation should be used to calculate the maximum mass flux, where units are as in (Eq. 4).
! !
Eq. 5 = ! 2 ln ! + 1 1 !
1
1 +1
!
Once the maximum mass flux has been obtained, the required effective discharge area may be
calculated by using Equation 6, where A is the required effective discharge area in mm, w is the
required relief load in kg/h, Kd is the discharge coefficient of the valve, Kb is the backpressure
correction factor (applicable to balanced bellows valves only), Kc is the combination capacity factor,
and Kv is the viscosity correction factor. C2 = 0.04 for U.S. customary units, 277.8 for SI units.
!
Eq. 6 =
! ! ! !
When an orifice area has been selected, Equation 6 may be rearranged to find the rated capacity of
the valve, shown in Equation 7:
Eq. 7 !"# = ! ! ! ! 277.8
Based on the relief pressure of 8.03 barg, the 90% intermediate flash pressure is at 7.227 barg.
Setting up a stream in Aspen HYSYS at the relief conditions and running it through an isenthalpic
flash will yield the following properties:
0 = 112.0 kg/m
9 = 90.73 kg/m
The critical pressure ratio and backpressure ratio may be calculated using (Eq. 2) and (Eq. 3):
! = 0.6989
1.01325
! = = 0.1120
8.03 + 1.01325
Because c is larger than a, flow across the relief valve is choked; therefore, the maximum mass flux
is calculated using (Eq. 4).
112 9.043 100,000 /
= 0.6989 = 4,844 kg/s-m
2.110
Assuming that all capacity coefficients are 1.0, aside from the discharge coefficient which is 0.85 in
accordance with guidance from API, the required area is calculated using (Eq. 6):
277.8 63,000
= = 4,250 mm
0.85 4,844
The results calculated above are compared to results obtained in Aspen HYSYS in Table 1.
Table 1: Comparison of example calculation and Aspen HYSYS calculation for critical two-phase flow
Based on the relief pressure of 1.54 barg, the 90% intermediate flash pressure is at 1.28 barg. Setting
up a stream in Aspen HYSYS at the relief conditions and running it through an isenthalpic flash will
yield the following properties:
0 = 8.264 kg/m
9 = 7.335 kg/m
The critical pressure ratio and backpressure ratio may be calculated using (Eq. 2) and (Eq. 3):
! = 0.6234
1.01325 + 0.6
! = = 0.6318
1.54 + 1.01325
Because c is smaller than a, flow across the relief valve is unchoked, and the maximum mass flux is
calculated using (Eq. 5), yielding a maximum mass flux G = 830 kg/m-s.
Assuming that all capacity coefficients are 1.0, aside from the discharge coefficient which is 0.85 in
accordance with guidance from API, the required area is calculated using (Eq. 6):
277.8 20,000
= = 7,870 mm
0.85 830
For a selected R orifice with an effective area of 10322.5 mm, the rated capacity is calculated using
(Eq. 7):
0.85 830 10322.5
!"# = = 26,230 kg/h
277.8
The results calculated above are compared to results obtained in Aspen HYSYS in Table 2.
Table 2: Comparison of example calculation and Aspen HYSYS calculation for subcritical two-phase flow
The omega parameter is calculated using a similar equation to (Eq. 1), where 0 is the liquid density
at the PRV inlet in kg/m.
"
Eq. 8 ! = 9 1
!
High or low subcooling is determined via the transition saturation pressure ratio, which is
calculated below in Equation 9 and 10, where st is the transition saturation pressure ratio, s is
the saturation pressure ratio, Ps is the saturation pressure in absolute units, and P0 is the upstream
pressure in absolute units.
2!
Eq. 9 !" =
1 + 2!
!
Eq. 10 ! =
!
The back pressure ratio a is calculated using (Eq. 3) as with the non-subcooled method.
For low subcooling, the maximum mass flux is calculated using Equation 12 below.
! " !
Eq. 12 = ! ! 2 1 ! + 2 ! ! ln ! 1 !
! 1 +1
For critical flow, =c; for subcritical flow, =a. Pressure is in psia or Paa. C1 = 68.09 for U.S.
customary units, 1.0 for SI units.
For high subcooling, the maximum mass flux is calculated using Equation 13 below.
Eq. 13 = ! 2 " ! !
Given a required relief load in lb/h or kg/h, the required area and rated capacity may be calculated
using (Eq. 6) and (Eq. 7).
Setting up a stream in Aspen HYSYS at the relief conditions and flashing appropriately, yields the
following properties:
0 = 29.23 lb/ft
Ps = 241.4 psia
P9 = 217.3 psia
9 = 17.53 lb/ft
The back pressure ratio of 0.0573 is much lower than the critical pressure ratio, so the flow is critical.
The maximum mass flux is calculated using (Eq. 12) with =c. The result shows that G = 2,150
lb/s-ft.
Assuming that all capacity coefficients are 1.0, aside from the discharge coefficient which is 0.65 in
accordance with guidance from API, the required area is calculated using (Eq. 6):
0.04 92,590
= = 2.651 in
0.65 2,150
The results calculated above are compared to results obtained in Aspen HYSYS in Table 3.
Table 3: Comparison of example calculation and Aspen HYSYS calculation for low subcooled critical flow
Setting up a stream in Aspen HYSYS at the relief conditions and flashing appropriately yields the
following properties:
0 = 35.17 lb/ft
Ps = 57.13 psia
P9 = 51.4 psia
9 = 13.72 lb/ft
The saturation pressure ratio is 0.9733. Because this is greater than the transition ratio, this case
involves low subcooling. The critical pressure ratio is calculated using (Eq. 11):
2 14.07 1 2 14.07 1
! 0.9733 1 1 = 0.9130
2 14.07 1 0.9733 2 14.07
The back pressure ratio of 0.9319 is higher than the critical pressure ratio, so the flow is subcritical.
The maximum mass flux is calculated using (Eq. 12) with =a=0.9319. The result is that G = 765.4
lb/s-ft.
Assuming that all capacity coefficients are 1.0, aside from the discharge coefficient which is 0.65 in
accordance with guidance from API, the required area is calculated using (Eq. 6):
0.04 92,590
= = 7.444 in
0.65 765.4
The results calculated above are compared to results obtained in Aspen HYSYS in Table 4.
Table 4: Comparison of example calculation and Aspen HYSYS calculation for low subcooled, subcritical
flow
Setting up a stream in Aspen HYSYS at the relief conditions and flashing appropriately, yields the
following properties:
0 = 30.34 lb/ft
Ps = 203.1 psia
P9 = 182.8 psia
9 = 17.40 lb/ft
Assuming that all capacity coefficients are 1.0, aside from the discharge coefficient which is 0.65 in
accordance with guidance from API, the required area is calculated using (Eq. 6):
0.04 92,590
= = 1.467 in
0.65 3,883
For a selected K orifice with an effective area of 1.838 in, the rated capacity is calculated using
(Eq. 7):
0.65 3,883 1.838
!"# = = 116,000 lb/h
0.04
The results calculated above are compared to results obtained in Aspen HYSYS in Table 5.
Table 5: Comparison of example calculation and Aspen HYSYS calculation for high subcooled, critical flow
Equations
The nozzle equation is shown below, where G is the mass flux in lb/ft-s or kg/m-s, v is the specific
volume in ft/lb or m/kg, and dp is the differential pressure increment in lbf/ft or Pa.
2!
Eq. 14 ! =
!
This is approximated as shown below, where v is the average specific volume over the pressure
increment p.
2!
Eq. 15 !
!
The sum is performed from the relief pressure until either a maximum value of G is reached or the
back pressure Pa is reached. If the maximum in G occurs above Pa, then the flow is choked.
A property table may be used to obtain the mass density along an isentropic path for numerical
integration, as shown below.
Note that the mass flux reaches a maximum at a pressure of 100.7 psia, indicating that flow is
choked and the relief mass flux is 3164 lb/ft-s.
Assuming that all capacity coefficients are 1.0, aside from the discharge coefficient which is 0.85
in accordance with guidance from API for two-phase flow at relief conditions, the required area is
calculated using (Eq. 6):
0.04 138,900
= = 2.066 in
0.85 3,164
For a selected L orifice with an effective area of 2.853 in, the rated capacity is calculated using
(Eq. 7):
0.85 3,164 2.853
!"# = = 191,800 lb/h
0.04
The results calculated above are compared to results obtained in Aspen HYSYS in Table 6.
Table 6: Comparison of example calculation and Aspen HYSYS calculation for direct integration
The speed of sound may be computed as shown below, where k is the ideal specific heat ratio in the
gas, T is the temperature
in K, and M is the molecular weight of the gas.
Eq. 17 = 91.2
The value of L in (Eq. 16) is read from a figure in the text. It may be approximated using two semilog
curve fits shown below, where X is the pressure ratio across the pressure relief valve.
39.461 ln + 12.648 2.866
Eq. 18 =
2.1716 ln + 51.914 > 2.866
Example
The example is based on the following conditions:
Setting up a stream in Aspen HYSYS at the relief conditions will yield the following properties:
M = 28.95
k = 1.404
1.404 311
= 91.2 = 354.2 m/s
28.95
Based on a pressure ratio of 330101.325=3.26, the contribution due to pressure ratio may be
estimated by (Eq.
18) to be 54.5 dB. Then, the total noise level is calculated using (Eq. 16):
1 !
!" = 54.5 + 10 log!" 52,560 354.2 = 114.1 dB
7200
The results calculated above are compared to results obtained in Aspen HYSYS in Table 7.
Table 7: Comparison of example calculation and Aspen HYSYS calculation for noise
Example
The example is based on the following conditions:
The reaction force may be calculated using (Eq. 19), as shown below. Because the choke pressure is
less than atmospheric pressure, the second term may be neglected.
1 1.081 92.15 + 273.15
= 37,150 = 2,498 N
27.9 2.081 53.92
The results calculated above are compared to results obtained in Aspen HYSYS in Table 8.
Table 8: Comparison of example calculation and Aspen HYSYS calculation for reaction force
References
1. American Petroleum Institute, API Standard 520 Part I 9th Ed.: Sizing, Selection, and Installation
of Pressure-relieving Devices, Washington, DC: API Publishing Services, 2014.
2. American Petroleum Institute, API Standard 521 6th Ed.: Pressure-relieving and Depressuring
Systems, Washington, DC: API Publishing Services, 2014.
3. American Petroleum Institute, API Recommended Practice 520 Part II 5th Ed., Reaffirmed,
Washington: API Publishing Services, 2011.
Worldwide Headquarters
Aspen Technology, Inc.
20 Crosby Drive | Bedford, MA 01730 | United States
phone: +1-781-221-6400 | fax: +1-781-221-6410 | info@aspentech.com
Regional Headquarters
Houston, TX | United States
phone: +1-281-584-1000
So Paulo | Brazil
phone: +55-11-3443-6261
Reading | United Kingdom
phone: +44-(0)-1189-226400
Singapore | Republic of Singapore
phone: +65-6395-3900
Manama | Bahrain
phone: +973-13606-400