SUMMARY OF ARGUMENTS

I. That the Section 292 of the Clandestinesia Penal Code and Section 67 and 67A of the
Clandestinesia Information Technology Act, 2000 are neither vague nor arbitrary
and intra vires the Constitution. Section 292 of the Clandestinesia Penal Code
illustrates the scope of indecency or obscenity .This impugned provision puts reasonable
restriction on the rights guaranteed under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution. Publication
,circulatation of sexually explicit and obscene material in electronic form amounts to an
offence under Section 67 and 67A of the Clandestinesia Information Technology Act,
2000.
II. That the Khosad tribe has fundamental right guaranteed under Article 29 of the
Constitution of Clandestinesia qua organization and conduct of the annual ritual
of Khosadasti which could be reasonably restricted. The fundamental Rights are
not.Any act or expression in a ritual which is obscene, disrupts public order and brings
harm to the society(herein, degrades and is unfair and harms the dignity of women) and
is not an integral part of the practice will be subject to reasonable restriction and hence
the notification released by the Union of Clandestinesia is just a reasonable restriction to
perform the ritual publically and permitted it to be practised privately.