Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Today these terms most commonly describe heirs to hereditary titles, particularly
in monarchies. Most monarchies refer to the heir apparent of their thrones with the
descriptive term of crown prince but these heirs may also be also accorded with a
more specific substantive title, such as Prince of Orange in the Netherlands,
Prince of Asturias in Spain, or Prince of Wales in the United Kingdom and the other
Commonwealth realms. In France the title was le Dauphin, in Imperial Russia it was
Tsesarevich.[1]
This article primarily describes the term heir apparent in a hereditary system
regulated by laws of primogenitureas opposed to cases where a monarch has a say in
naming the heir.
Contents [hide]
1 Heir apparent versus heir presumptive
1.1 Daughters in male-preference primogeniture
1.2 Women as heirs apparent
2 Displacement of heirs apparent
2.1 People who lost heir apparent status
2.2 Breaching legal qualification of heirs apparent
3 Heirs apparent who never inherited the throne
3.1 Heirs apparent who predeceased the monarch
3.2 Heirs apparent who were forced to abandon their claim
3.3 Heirs apparent of monarchs who themselves abdicated or were deposed
4 Heirs apparent as of 2017
5 See also
6 References
Heir apparent versus heir presumptive[edit]
Throngs before the Imperial Palace in Japan awaiting the appearance of the Crown
Prince Hirohito for the recent proclamation of his official recognition as the heir
apparent to the Japanese Imperial Throne New York Times, 1916.
In a hereditary system governed by some form of primogeniture, an heir apparent is
easily identifiable as the person whose position as first in the line of succession
is secure, regardless of future births. An heir presumptive, by contrast, can
always be bumped down in the succession by the birth of somebody more closely
related in a legal sense (according to that form of primogeniture) to the current
title-holder.
...saving the rights of any issue of his late Majesty King William IV, which may be
born of his late Majesty's consort.
This provided for the possibility that William's wife, Adelaide of Saxe-Meiningen,
was pregnant at the moment of his death, since such a posthumous child, regardless
of its sex, would have displaced Victoria from the throne.[2] Adelaide was 44 at
the time, so pregnancy was possible even if unlikely.
Thus, normally, even an only daughter will not be heir apparent, since at any time
a brother might be born who, though younger, would assume that position. Hence, she
is an heir presumptive. For example, Queen Elizabeth II was heir presumptive during
the reign of her father, King George VI, because at any stage up to his death,
George could have fathered a legitimate son.
In 2015, pursuant to the 2011 Perth Agreement, the Commonwealth realms changed the
rules of succession to the 16 thrones of Elizabeth II to absolute primogeniture,
except for male heirs born before the Perth Agreement. The effects are not likely
to be felt for many years; the first two heirs at the time of the agreement
(Charles, Prince of Wales and his son Prince William, Duke of Cambridge) were
already eldest born children, and in 2013, William's first-born son Prince George
of Cambridge became the next apparent successor.
But even in legal systems that apply male-preference primogeniture, female heirs
apparent are by no means impossible if a male heir apparent dies leaving no sons
but at least one daughter, then the eldest daughter would replace her father as
heir apparent to whatever throne or title is concerned, but only when it has become
clear that the widow of the deceased is not pregnant. Then, as the representative
of her father's line she would assume a place ahead of any more distant relatives.
Such a situation has not to date occurred with the English or British throne;
several times an heir apparent has died, but each example has either been childless
or left a son or sons. However, there have been several female heirs apparent to
British peerages (e.g., Frances Ward, 6th Baroness Dudley, and Henrietta Wentworth,
6th Baroness Wentworth).
In one special case, however, England and Scotland had a female heir apparent. The
Revolution settlement that established William and Mary as joint monarchs in 1689
only gave the power to continue the succession through issue to Mary II, eldest
daughter of the previous king, James II. William, by contrast, was to reign for
life only, and his (hypothetical) children by a wife other than Mary would be
placed in his original place (as Mary's first cousin) in the line of succession
after Mary's younger sister Anne. Thus, although after Mary's death William
continued to reign, he had no power to beget direct heirs,[3] and Anne became the
heir apparent for the remainder of William's reign. She eventually succeeded him as
Queen of England, Scotland and Ireland.