EDMAG8S Assessment Task 2
Using insights from research to support planning for mathematics teaching
and learning
‘Annotated Bibliography
Fuchs, L. S., Schumacher, R. F., Long, J., Namkung, J, Hamlett, CL,
Girino, P.T., Changas, P. (2013) Improving at-isk learners’ understanding of
fractions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 683-700.
doi:10.1037/a0032446
In this rice, Fuchs etal investigate the outcomes ofan intervention devised to
increase tisk Grad Wlidenis' understanding of general and equivalent —> (c.
‘actions; These students were selected from beneath the 35” percentile ona
prior assessment. The interventions employed were drected by a model of
‘mathematic teaching by Geary (2004), focusing on procedural and conceptual
understanding, and learning that relies on foundational abities and domsin-
general mathematical ski. The intervention design comprised the following 1o
counteract for imitations inthe learning of factions: developing automaticity with
‘marker fractions in connection to fractional values, teaching effective strategies
for patoning measurement interpretation actives, simplifying explanations
through the language used, and delivering e structure to suppor students in
‘employing attentive behaviour. Research findings displayed that understanding of |,
_measurementin equivalent fractions is vital. Additionally, speci interventions
can be constructed to counterbalance liitaions experienced by a-isk leamers.
_Precicors linked with fraction learning encompass attentive behaviour,
[bfocessing speed, listening comprehension and working memory. The
successfuiness of findings inthe study alowed forthe achievement for atisk
leamers io be improved when teachers itis foundational abilities and general
‘mathematical skis. This was based on a significant improvement in elements
_2dcressed inthe intervention design, as wal as representing, ordering, comparing _/
fractions and placement of fractions on a number inespeeitie
«denominator. Student motivation increased, allowing a sense of enthusiasm,
‘Stephenie Mero
's00203604
Gabriel, F., Coché, F., Szues, D., Caretta, V., Rey, B., & Content, A. (2012).
Developing Children's Understanding of Fractions: An Intervention Study. Mind,
Brain, and Education, 63), 137-146,
In this aricle, Gabrial et al. conduct an intervention study. The inition was to
)
the commencement of factonatainment dung Grades and The study had)" Hent
‘2 control group which undertook typical raction-based lessons, and the
intervention group engaged in only the designed fractions activites (placing @
focus on equivalent factions). The intervention compised five ard games that
‘were fracions-based and played in small groups of three tofve children. One
game was engaged in each week, with the second lesson encompassing
increased diffcully, Children were encouraged to use pre-cut wooden disks to
~ahipulat, Fepresent and compare fractions, and an identical pre-test and post-
test wore comple. Research findings displayed thatthe intvantion group had
“Improved conceptual undersianding comprising Comparison, estimation and
“Fumber ings. Students developed a sounder knowledge of the connection
between “one” as a unit and fractions, made fewer errors in comparison to the
control group (specifically regarding arithmetic operations) and exhibited
“Improvement in performing addition and subtraction using @ common
> Inferwention
‘competence and mastery. The control group, however, ony displayed
improvement in procedural understanding due to the emphasis on mechanical
Jeaming procedures and poor use of representations and manipulatives.
‘Mamede, E., & Oliveira, M. (2011), Issues on children's ideas of fractions when
‘quotient interpretation is used. In Proceedings of 7th Congress of the European
Society for Research in Mathematics Education. Polbnia: Rzeszéw.
“The objective ofthis atl Isto comprehend chidrenslundarstanding of fractions) —>
When Using quotient interpretation. The intervention tok place in a primary school
classroom with 7-¥@arold Gilde who had not yet been expose to racions
“The intervention was quatatve and experimental in that the teaching methods
used were nat typical for aching fractions 1 Grade 1 chiren. The
mentStephanie Mert
‘oozmseet
‘presentation of fractions was learned by chidren and they were challenged to
‘ids alongside verbal teaching, Research findings established that children can
comprehend fractions when they are introduced in quotient situations, Ordering
_2ppeared to assist children in grasping the inverse afflation amongst the disor
‘end the quotiont with a common dividend. Children grasped fractions using
‘Symbolic representation when using quotient interpretation, which involved
constant ference tothe numerator and denominator. When division was,
required, children successfully used the methods of partitioning and = [stn
> produce equal parts, however, this became diffcultwhen :
asked to partition continuous amounts. Overall, this displayed the possibilities of
success that can be achieved through approaching the teaching of fractions in an
atypical manner.
4
Susanne Scharnagl, Petra Evanschitzky, Judith Streb, Manfred Spitzer, & Katrin
Hill. (2014). Sixth Graders Benefit from Educational Software when Learning
‘about Fractions: A Controlled Classroom study. Numeracy, 7(1) 4
‘The purpose of the study was to investigate the effectiveness of educational web~
“based sofware when teaching and leaning the mathematical tpic of fractions
during Grade 6. The study focussed on adding end subtracting fractions, where
the intervention group used the educational software, and the contra group used
‘racitonal teaching methods. This study used a specific online software program,
\whose characteristics and contents can be generalised to most other online
programs. Teachers used the program to produce, arrange and analyse tasks that
were competed during schol and for homework. These tasks were personae) Ube
‘osuitthe diferent needs and achievement level of students, and each task was (on,
separated into steps followed by valuable feedback: Research findings displayed 7
‘hat the intervention group achieved betta overall post-test scores compared with
the control group, highlighting that the web-based program did enhance the
‘mathematical learning of fractions The intervention showed an optimal benef for‘Stophario Meret
0203521
students with lower mathematics-related anxiety and those with an already sound:
level of mathematics achievement. lack of simple arthmetic understanding was
found to hinder the further attainment of knowledge when adding and subtracting
fractions using the web-based program. Students reported high lovele of
‘enjoyment and motivation when using technology to learn, and it was commonly § Eel
stated thatthe immeciate feedback alowed students to recognise enors and.) ("9
develop required strategies.
Van Steenbrugge, H., Remillard, J, Verschaffe,L, Valcke, M., & Desoete, A
(2015). Teaching Fractions in Elementary School. An Observational Study. The
Elementary Schoo Journal, 116(1), 49-7. andes
‘The purpose of his study was to analyse how fractions are taught inGrade 4, |v uchicws
hile simuitaneously being centred around five forms of instruction. The analysis
‘of teaching fractions-based lessons focused on Whole lass and individual
teaching, and fve forms of instruction that were acclaimed in prior iterature;
_sdng to students’ informal knowledge, offering students opportunites to apply
and deliberate other strategies, using visual representations, allowing students to
‘evaluate the logically of an answer or practise estimating to predict, and utising (|
realistic contextual activites. The elements of fractions that were taughtin he/she 8
study comprised ordering and comparing faction, the association amongst .
fractions and decimals and equivalent fractions. Research fnaings displayed that " p
the instructional recommendations onthe teaching an leaming of ractons were
rolacted a mid extent inthe study, deste pior research asserting is
numerous banefis. A significant nding, however, was that a certain numberof
instructions were required to address each element successful due tothe
Aifering complex and citfcly. Fewer inetuctons were needed for ordering
“and comparing fractions, and equivalent fractions, whereas greater instructions
_ wore required when teaching th ink between fractions and decimal, Findings
also concluded that while whole class teaching was useful fo al forms of
insuction, individual teaching was benefcal for indvial practise of applying
diferent strategies, using visual representations, and estimatingSummary of research
Ags regareh
fadiegs regarch 9 swrranie Meroe
how shudlenti” leave trocar S0020see
Sunhesis ofReseareh Findings 97.2) Ye rnpirccrtior lor
teaching
Wie each aril had unique objective, purpose, ard age group, sila
themes can be observed. The benefit of using visuel activity-based learning and.
‘manipulatives was presented by Mamede & Oliveira (2011) and Gabriel etal
(2012), They put forward that using visual tools such as PowerPoint sides,
Worksheets and concrete materials assists students with understanding
‘equivalent fractions locating fractions on a number line, ordering, comparing,
‘adding, subtracting and partitioning fractions. Moreover, Gabriel etal (2012)
utilised visual card games, and Scharnagl et al (2014) exploited the use of
technology through a web-based program. Using technology allowed for individual
student needs to be met through personalisation and immediate feedback
Evidence suggested that by utlising these visual tools, students’ levels of listening
comprehension, motivation and mastery increased.
Fuchs etal (2013) and Gabriel etal (2012) emphasise thatconceptual
Understanding alongside foundational general mathematical skils are central fo
{urther developing an understanding of fractions. A lack of basic arithmetic
Understanding was found to impede this, specially when adding and subtracting
fractions. Procedural understanding, however, is best achieved through traditional
mechanical learning. Van Steenbrugge et al (2015) and Schamagl et al (2014)
additonaly established that whole class teaching is beneficial for all types of
instruction, however individual teaching aids individual practise when exercising
strategies, using visual tools and estimating, The content put forward by Van
‘Stoenbrugge et al (2015) acts as a summary, a it reports the beneft of using
aifferent forms of instruction and strategies that address various aspects of
teaching fractions. An anomaly present in the iteratureis the absence of research
‘about how fractions are taught in Kindergarten and Grades 2 and 3.