Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Vijay K Puri2
Professor , Civil Engineering Department, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901,
USA, puri@engr.siu.edu
ABSTRACT
Shallow foundations may experience a reduction in bearing capacity and increase in settlement and tilt due to seismic loading as
has been observed during several earthquakes. Shallow foundations for seismic loads have generally been designed by the
equivalent static approach. Foundations are considered eccentrically loaded and the ultimate bearing capacity is estimated
accordingly. Building Codes generally allow an increase of 33% in bearing capacity when earthquake loads, in addition to
static loads are used in the design of the foundation. Considerable research effort has been devoted to the determination of the
dynamic bearing capacity in recent years. Significant developments in determination of dynamic bearing capacity are presented
in the paper.
RSUM
Fondations superficielles peuvent exprience une rduction de capacit portante et augmentation de rglement et
d'inclinaison en raison de la charge sismique comme a t observ au cours de plusieurs tremblements de terre. Fondations
superficielles pour les charges sismiques ont gnralement t conues par l'approche statique quivalente. Fondations sont
considrs comme excentrique charges et la capacit portante ultime est estime en consquence. Les Codes du btiment
permettent gnralement une augmentation de 33 % de la capacit portante lorsque les charges de tremblement de terre en plus
de charges statiques sont utilises dans la conception de la Fondation. Recherche un effort considrable a t consacr la
dtermination de la capacit portante dynamique au cours des dernires annes. Des dveloppements importants dans la
dtermination de la capacit portante dynamique sont prsentes dans le document.
ec exp 4.3k hl D (2)
2 9k 1.2 (4)
e (1 kv ) exp h
3 1 kv
Figure 2. Failure surface in soil for seismic bearing Where,
capacity assumed by Richard et al [11]
surface and
D= c/ H
0.5B
H exp tan D f
2
Figure 3. Failure surface used by Budhu and al-karni for
cos
static and dynamic case[12]
4 2
Logaritmic failure surfaces shown in Fig. 3
were assumed by Budhu and Al-karni [12] to (5)
determine the seismic bearing capacity of soils.
They suggested modifications to the equations Df = depth of the footing and
commonly used for static bearing capacity to
obtain the dynamic bearing capacityas follows: = angle of internal friction
d e (1)
317
An experimental study was also conducted by
Al-Karni and Budhu [13] on model footing to
study the response under horizontal acceleration
and compared the results with the approach
suggested in [12].
(b) Nqd
Fig. 5 Values of bearing cacity factors (a) Ncd (b) Nqd and
(c) Nd [14]
3 SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS IN
LIQUEFIABLE SOILS
REFERENCES