You are on page 1of 7

Journal of Food Engineering 66 (2005) 259265

www.elsevier.com/locate/jfoodeng

Eect of thermal processing on the quality loss of pineapple juice


Marisa Rattanathanalerk, Naphaporn Chiewchan *, Walaiporn Srichumpoung
Department of Food Engineering, King Mongkuts University of Technology Thonburi, Tungkru, Bangkok 10140, Thailand
Received 24 November 2003; accepted 14 March 2004

Abstract
Three indexes, namely colorimetric Hunter parameters (L, a, b and DE), hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) and brown pigment
formation, were monitored to determine the quality loss of pineapple juice at temperatures ranging from 55 to 95 C. The changes in
a and b values followed rst order kinetics while DE tted well to a combined model which described both non-enzymatic browning
reaction and destruction of carotenoid pigment. For browning indexes, HMF and brown pigment formation increased linearly with
heating time and could be explained using zero order reaction kinetics. The results suggested that processing temperature had a
signicant eect on the color change of pineapple juice. The dependence of the rate constant on temperature was represented by an
Arrhenius equation.
 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords: Color change; Hydroxymethylfurfural; Kinetics; Non-enzymatic browning; Pineapple juice

1. Introduction value represents the blueyellow spectrum (Ranganna,


1986). Other assays include the analysis of intermediates
Pineapple (Ananas cosmosus) is one of the most and nal products of non-enzymatic browning reactions.
important commercial fruits of Thailand. The fruit can The measurement of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF),
be consumed fresh or processed in various forms and an important intermediate, is widely used as an indicator
pineapple juice is a popular product due to its very of Maillard reactions, i.e. browning development (Bo-
pleasant aroma and avor. zkurt, Gogus, & Eren, 1999; Cohen, Birk, Mannheim, &
Thermal treatment is generally applied to extend shelf Saguy, 1998; Garza et al., 1999).
life of fruit products. However, heating processes can Kinetic models have been developed to evaluate
aect the quality of product which leads to consumer color degradation and non-enzymatic browning reac-
dissatisfaction. Non-enzymatic browning reactions and tions during processing of fruit products such as apple
pigment destruction have been found to be major causes juice (Cohen et al., 1998), pear puree (Ibarz et al.,
of such problems. Therefore, kinetic studies are required 1999) and peach puree (Garza et al., 1999). For pine-
and used to predict quality degradation resulting from apple products, Fontana, Howard, Criddle, Hansen,
process conditions. and Wilhelmsen (1993) studied the eects of additional
Dierent methods can be used to determine the extent components, i.e. sugars, organic acids, on the quality
of color change. Color measurement is simple and faster deterioration kinetics of pineapple concentrate at 6080
than chemical analysis. The Hunter parameters (L, a, and C. However, information regarding the changes in
b) have been proven to be useful for describing visual quality of pineapple drinks in terms of color change
color change of various fruit products (Avila & Silva, and non-enzymatic browning during heating is
1999; Garza, Ibarz, Pagan, & Giner, 1999; Ibarz, Pagan, unavailable.
& Garza, 1999). The L value represents the lightdark This work was aimed at investigating the quality loss
spectrum, a value is for the greenred spectrum and b of pineapple juice as aected by heat treatment. Visual
color, 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) and brown pig-
ment accumulation were monitored during heating at
*
Corresponding author. Fax: +66-2470-9240. 5595 C. The kinetics of these indicators were also
E-mail address: naphaporn.rat@kmutt.ac.th (N. Chiewchan). investigated. The information obtained from the study
0260-8774/$ - see front matter  2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2004.03.016
260 M. Rattanathanalerk et al. / Journal of Food Engineering 66 (2005) 259265

could be used as a guideline for designing thermal pro- measured and total color dierences were calculated
cesses to reduce the quality degradation of the products. from L, a and b values.

2.4. Determination of non-enzymatic browning index and


2. Material and methods 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF)

2.1. Preparation of pineapple juice The following assays were performed using the
methods as mentioned in Cohen et al. (1998). 5 ml of
Fresh Smooth Cayenne pineapples were obtained 95% ethyl alcohol was added to 5 ml of pineapple juice
from a local market. After rinsing the fruit in tap water, sample. The mixture was centrifuged at 1000g for 15
the shell and core were removed using a stainless steel min. The supernatant of the centrifuged sample was
knife. The esh was cut into small pieces and the juice separated into two portions. One was taken to measure
was extracted using a hydraulic machine (Sakaya Model the absorbency at 420 nm for the non-enzymatic
4104, Thailand) to extract the juice. Total soluble solid browning index. To determine the HMF content, 2 ml
(TSS) and pH value of the juice were determined in the of the other portion was introduced into a 16 ml screw
ranges of 12.214.2 Brix and 3.744.00, respectively. cap tube. 2 ml of 12% w/w trichloroacetic acid (TCA;
The prepared juice was then kept at 4 C until used. Sigma, Germany) and 2 ml of 0.025 M thiobabituric
acid (TBA; Carlo Erba, Italy) were subsequently added
2.2. Thermal treatment and mixed thoroughly. The tubes with sample were then
placed in the water bath (Memmert Model W 600,
A series of thin wall glass tubes (length 30 cm; inner Denmark) at 40 C (0.5 C). After incubating for 50
diameter 5 mm; wall thickness 2 mm) were lled with 8 min, the tubes were cooled immediately using tap water
ml of pineapple juice. The tubes (lled with the juice) and the absorbency was measured at 443 nm. A cali-
were sealed at both ends and then subjected to heat in a bration curve of HMF (Aldrich, Germany) was utilized
water bath (Memmert Model W 600, Denmark) at 55, to quantify the HMF concentration.
65, 75, 85 and 95 C for 80 min. The come up times for
every condition was less than 1 min. The temperature of 2.5. Experimental design
the juice at the center of a tube was monitored during
the experiments using type T thermocouples to an The experiments were conducted for ve levels of
accuracy of 1 C. The tubes were removed every 10 temperatures (55, 65, 75, 85 and 95 C). A 2-factor
min and immediately cooled in an ice-water bath in factorial design was used in scheduling of the experi-
order to stop the heat accumulation. The control ments with three replicates in each case.
experiments (without heat treatment) were done by the
same procedure, lling 8 ml of pineapple juice into the 2.6. Data analysis
tubes and placing them directly in the ice-water bath.
Color change, non-enzymatic browning index and hy- The results were reported as an average of three
droxymethylfurfural (HMF) of pineapple juice were replicates. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) of the two
determined using a spectrocolorimeter (JUKI Model factors and interactions were applied to the dierent sets
JP7100/C, Japan) and spectrophotometer (Shimadzu of data with a signicant level of 0.05 (a 0:05).
Model UV-2101 PC, Japan), respectively. All experi-
ments were performed in three replicates.
3. Results and discussion
2.3. Color measurement
3.1. Color change of pineapple juice during heat treatment
Color changes of pineapple juice were analyzed by
measuring the transmittance using a spectrocolorimeter. The color degradation of pineapple juice as aected
2 North skylight was used as the light source. The by thermal processing was investigated using Hunter
spectrocolorimeter was calibrated against distilled water parameters (L, a and b). The enzymatic browning reac-
(L 100, a 0, b 0) before the measurement tion was neglected in this study as the enzymes causing
(according to the equipment instruction manual). A browning were susceptible to heat, at temperatures of
glass cuvette (3.5 4 1.5 cm3 ) containing heat-treated >50 (Martinez & Whitaker, 1995). Therefore, non-
juice was placed in the cell transmittance specimen enzymatic browning and pigment destruction were
compartment. The lid of the compartment was closed considered as the major causes of color change in
and the analysis was then conducted. Three Hunter pineapple juice.
parameters, namely L (lightness), a (redness and The results obtained were presented in terms of L=L0 ,
greenness) and b (yellowness and blueness) were a=a0 and b=b0 when L0 , a0 and b0 represented the initial
M. Rattanathanalerk et al. / Journal of Food Engineering 66 (2005) 259265 261

values once the sample temperature had reached the set 4.50

temperature. The plots between relative Hunter 4.00

parameters and processing time at dierent tempera- 3.50

tures are shown in Figs. 14. In order to explain the 3.00


phenomena of color change in pineapple juice, the data 2.50

E
2.00

1.50

1.00
1.04 0.50
1.02 0.00
1.00 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
0.98 Heating time (min)
0.96
L/L0

Fig. 4. The change of total color dierent (DE) of pineapple juice


0.94
samples at dierent heating temperatures: 55 C r, 65 C (h), 75 C
0.92
(m), 85 C (s) and 95 C (d).
0.90
0.88
0.86
0.84
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
were tted using a kinetic model and kinetic rate con-
Heating time (min) stants are presented in Table 1.
Fig. 1 shows the change in relative L values during
Fig. 1. The change of lightness L=L0 of pineapple juice samples at
dierent heating temperatures: 55 C r, 65 C (h), 75 C (m), 85 C heat treatment under various conditions. With
(s) and 95 C (d). increasing temperature and time, pineapple juice be-
came darker which corresponded to a decrease in L
value. Most of the previous works demonstrated that
1.25 the changes in L value as aected by heat treatment
followed rst order kinetics (Avila & Silva, 1999;
1.20 Garza et al., 1999; Ibarz et al., 1999). Moreover, two
consecutive rst order reactions have been proposed
1.15 when the experimental data could not be described by
a/ao

single reaction (Barreiro, Milano, & Sandoval, 1997).


1.10
However, it was obvious that the changes in L value
1.05
found in the present study could not be tted to any
simple kinetic model. The degradation in L value might
1.00 be inuenced by an increase in a value and a decrease
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 in b value. The results suggested that the reduction in
Heating time (min)
the luminosity were not from a single mechanism.
Fig. 2. The change of redness a=a0 of pineapple juice samples at Therefore, the kinetics for describing L value was not
dierent heating temperatures: 55 C r, 65 C (h), 75 C (m), 85 C determined.
(s) and 95 C (d). The evolution of an a parameter with treatment time
can be tted to both zero and rst order reactions (Fig.
1.00
2). However, with increasing temperature, the experi-
mental data were better tted to rst order kinetics. This
0.96 nding was consistent with many previous studies (Avila
& Silva, 1999; Garza et al., 1999; Ibarz et al., 1999). The
0.92 values of the kinetic constants increased with treatment
b/bo

temperature. This supported the theory that an increase


0.88
in heating temperature induced the color shift to red.
Since the major color of pineapple juice is yellow, the
0.84
amount of this pigment in pineapple esh is an excellent
0.80 measure of quality (Mehrlich & Felton, 1980). In this
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 study, the b value was used as an indicator to describe
Heating time (min) the pigment destruction in the juice. Fig. 3 shows that
Fig. 3. The change of yellowness b=b0 of pineapple juice samples at
the rst order kinetic model tted well to parameter b
dierent heating temperatures: 55 C r, 65 C (h), 75 C (m), 85 C which was consistent with previous works (Avila &
(s) and 95 C (d). Silva, 1999; Barreiro et al., 1997). The rate constant
262 M. Rattanathanalerk et al. / Journal of Food Engineering 66 (2005) 259265

Table 1
Kinetic parameters for color change of pineapple juice
Parameter Kinetic model T (C) k0 (min1 ) 103 k1 (min1 ) 103 R2
a=a0 n1 55 0.50 0.980
65 0.83 0.950
75 1.41 0.962
85 1.79 0.992
95 2.40 0.972
b=b0 n1 55 0.52 0.958
65 0.91 0.996
75 1.40 0.987
85 1.87 0.990
95 2.40 0.985
DE Combined 55 28.73 25.31 0.963
65 69.72 31.64 0.968
75 81.03 31.34 0.996
85 132.31 46.39 0.991
95 219.47 59.96 0.982

increased with the higher heating temperatures. This an important driving force behind the changes in the
could be explained by the assumption that high tem- color of heated samples. The results suggested that the
perature accelerated the carotenoid isomerization which change in DE was inuenced by both non-enzymatic
led to the loss of yellowness (Chen, Peng, & Chen, 1995; browning and pigment destruction. The combined
Singleton, Gortner, & Young, 1961). model was applied to describe the phenomena which
Previous studies of the color change during heat occurred during heating of pineapple juice.
treatment showed similar results. Avila and Silva (1999) The combined model was used widely to explain the
examined the color degradation of peach puree as af- color change in many fruit products (Avila & Silva,
fected by heat treatment. Peach puree became darker, 1999; Garza et al., 1999; Ibarz et al., 1999; Lozano &
corresponding to a decrease in L value and an increase in Ibarz, 1997) and was proposed as a two-stage mecha-
a value, with increasing temperature. Moreover, the loss nism (Ibarz et al., 1999). The rst stage is color forma-
of yellowness was also expressed by a decrease in the b tion due to the Maillard reaction which follows a zero
value. They concluded that the major causes of color order kinetics k0 . The second stage is destruction of
change were due to carotenoid degradation and non- natural fruit pigments which follow rst order kinetics
enzymatic browning (Maillard). k1 . The combined kinetic model is shown in Eq. (2):
To describe the total color of pineapple juice, the
C Kc  Kc  C0 expk1 t 2
combination of parameters L, a and b, were determined
in terms of total color dierence (DE). DE of pineapple Substituting C with DE and DE at initial time is zero
juice sample was calculated using Eq. (1): (C0 0), Eq. (2) becomes
2 2 2 1=2
DE DL Da Db  1 DE Kc 1  expk1 t 3
The plot between the total color dierence of pine- where Kc k0 =k1 .
apple juice and time is shown in Fig. 4. The results In this work, the results showed that the two reac-
showed that DE increased signicantly at higher heating tions occurred at a higher rate as temperature increased.
temperatures and prolonged processing times. It was Kc represents the relation between kinetic constants, k0
also observed that the rst portion of the curves exhib- (color formation) and k1 (pigment destruction). Kc val-
ited steeper slopes as the heating temperature increased. ues greater than 1 indicated that the Maillard reaction
It means that higher temperature accelerated the predominated over pigment destruction. Moreover, the
chemical reactions and most of the color change oc- higher the temperature, the higher the value of Kc . This
curred during the early heating period. To describe the suggested that reaction rates were strongly dependent on
reactions closely, the juice samples may be taken more processing temperatures.
frequently at higher heating temperatures. Many studies of the color changes during heat
In this current study, the change in DE did not t treatment of fruit puree demonstrated similar nding.
simple zero or rst order kinetic models. Color changes Ibarz et al. (1999) found that a combined model could
of pineapple juice may be the result of more than one be used to describe the change of DE in pear puree. The
reaction and these reactions may not occur simulta- Maillard reaction was found to be dominant rather than
neously at one temperature. Therefore, temperature was pigment destruction. Garza et al. (1999) implied that DE
M. Rattanathanalerk et al. / Journal of Food Engineering 66 (2005) 259265 263

Table 2
Arrhenius equation parameters for the dierent variables of pineapple juice
Variable Kinetic model K0 Ea (kJ/mol) R2
2
a=a0 n1 11.46 10 39.788 0.983
b=b0 n1 9.67 102 39.201 0.978
DE Combined; n 0 1.12 105 47.336 0.962

tted to combined kinetic model and stated that brown 2.00

color formation was higher than pigment destruction in


peach puree. 1.80

The variation in kinetic constants with heating tem-

HMT / HMT o
perature could be described using the Arrhenius rela- 1.60

tionship. The constant parameters obtained from the


Arrhenius equation are given in Table 2. In this study, a, 1.40

b and DE values were chosen to demonstrate the change


of pineapple juice color during heating. Activation en- 1.20

ergy values of 39.78, 39.20 and 47.33 kJ/mol were ob-


tained for parameters a, b and DE, respectively. These 1.00
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
values were found to be lower than those reported in the Heating time (min)
literature for peach puree (Avila & Silva, 1999; Ibarz
et al., 1999) and pear puree (Garza et al., 1999). This Fig. 5. The relative value of HMF of pineapple juice samples at dif-
ferent heating temperatures: 55 C r, 65 C (h), 75 C (m), 85 C
could be due to the dierent type of fruit, which implied
(s) and 95 C (d).
the dierences in composition such as sugar and amino
acid content, total solid content, pH, acidity and also the
temperature range of the study (Beveridge & Harrison, investigated in this study. The relationship between
1984; Ahmed, Shivhare, & Kaur, 2002). This was sup- relative HMF content HMF=HMF0 and processing
ported by the work of Lozano and Ibarz (1997). Above time at dierent temperatures applied is shown in Fig. 5.
authors indicated that change in hue during heating was It was observed that heating temperature had a marked
dierent for each fruit pulp. For example, apple pulp was eect on the formation of HMF. The results indicated
more sensitive to discoloration during heating than plum that HMF increased linearly with time and the higher
pulp. Therefore, the composition of the products was amounts were found at the higher heating conditions.
related to dierent degrees of heat sensitivity. The relationship between relative A420 A420 =A0420 and
time was also observed to be linear, similar to HMF
3.2. 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) accumulation and development. Therefore, zero order kinetics was applied
brown pigment formation in pineapple juice during heat to describe the change of both substances and the
treatment equation used is shown as:
C C0 k0 t 4
As non-enzymatic browning is one of the major
causes of color change in fruit products, the eect of Table 3 shows the values of the kinetic parameters
heating temperature and processing time on the accu- for HMF and brown pigment formation. The kinetic
mulation of HMF and brown pigment formation were constants tended to increase with the processing

Table 3
Kinetic parameters for HMF evolution and brown pigment formation of pineapple juice
Parameter Kinetic model T (C) k0 (min1 ) 103 R2
HMF=HMF0 n0 55 3.80 0.971
65 5.07 0.992
75 6.76 0.982
85 9.14 0.989
95 12.26 0.990
A420 =A0420 n0 55 0.10 0.973
65 0.19 0.956
75 0.31 0.973
85 0.41 0.988
95 0.56 0.982
264 M. Rattanathanalerk et al. / Journal of Food Engineering 66 (2005) 259265

Table 4
Arrhenius parameters for the dierent variables of pineapple juice
Variable Kinetic model K0 Ea (kJ/mol) R2
HMF=HMF0 n0 179.182 29.401 0.998
A420 =A0420 n0 724.95 42.794 0.977

temperature. This indicated that HMF was formed at a to 95 C. The changes in Hunter parameters a and b
higher rate at elevated temperatures and subsequently followed rst order kinetics while the change in para-
this phenomenon aected brown pigment formation. meter L could not be tted to any simple relationship.
Several works studied the Maillard reaction in Total color dierence DE could be described using a
aqueous systems containing glucose and amino acid combined model which included the eect of both non-
(Carabasa-Giribet & Ibarz-Ribas, 2000; Gogus, Bo- enzymatic browning and pigment destruction. The
zkurt, & Eren, 1998; Reyes, Poocharoen, & Wrolstad, changes of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) and brown
1982). Garza et al. (1999) reported that the HMF con- pigment formation were chosen to demonstrate the non-
tent increased with treatment time. This increase oc- enzymatic browning reaction occurring during the study
curred from with disappearance of the sucrose due to and were found to follow zero order kinetics. The results
Maillard reaction and sucrose hydrolysis increased with suggested that processing temperatures strongly inu-
treatment temperature. Pineapple juice typically con- enced the reaction rate. The Arrhenius model could be
tains sucrose, glucose and fructose (C amara, Dez, & used to describe the temperature dependence of the
Torija, 1995) which are the substrates of the Maillard reaction rate constant for all parameters considered. A
reaction. When the temperature increased, the sucrose in study of quality loss in terms of sugars and amino acids,
the juice was easily hydrolyzed and more glucose and the substrates of the Maillard reaction, together with
fructose were formed, and thus increased the substrates carotenoid destruction as aected by heat treatment is
of the Maillard reaction. Moreover, the high tempera- recommended for future work.
ture accelerated the reaction which is shown by the in-
crease in rate constant values.
The change in the relative absorbancy at 420 nm References
A420 =A0420 which is related to brown pigment formation
was adequately described by zero order kinetics with the Ahmed, J., Shivhare, U. S., & Kaur, M. (2002). Thermal color
high correlation coecient R2 > 0:95. The results ob- degradation kinetics of mango puree. International Journal of Food
tained from this study were consistent with previous Properties, 5(2), 359366.
works. Beveridge and Harrison (1984) studied the eect Avila, I. M. L. B., & Silva, C. L. M. (1999). Modeling kinetics of
thermal degradation of color in peach puree. Journal of Food
of temperature (5080 C) and soluble solids (45.272.5 Engineering, 39(2), 161166.
Bx) on non-enzymatic browning in pear juice concen- Barreiro, J. A., Milano, M., & Sandoval, A. J. (1997). Kinetics of color
trate and browning could be modeled as a zero order change of double concentrated tomato paste during thermal
rate process. Cohen et al. (1998) reported that the zero treatment. Journal of Food Engineering, 33(34), 359371.
Beveridge, T., & Harrison, J. E. (1984). Nonenzymatic browning in
order kinetics could be used as a non-enzymatic
pear juice concentrate at elevated temperatures. Journal of Food
browning index A420 for apple juice (13 Bx) heating at Science, 49(5), 13351340.
95123 C. Bozkurt, H., Gogus, F., & Eren, S. (1999). Nonenzymatic browning
Comparing the activation energy obtained for reactions in boiled grape juice and its models during storage. Food
HMF=HMF0 to A420 =A0420 it was observed that the acti- Chemistry, 64(1), 8993.
vation energy found for HMF formation was lower than Camara, M., Dez, C., & Torija, E. (1995). Chemical characterization
of pineapple juices and nectars, principal components analysis.
that of brown pigment formation. The results implied Food Chemistry, 54(1), 93100.
that HMF occurred at a higher rate than the latter sub- Carabasa-Giribet, M., & Ibarz-Ribas, A. (2000). Kinetics of color
stance. After heating, HMF retained in the juice would development in aqueous glucose systems at high temperatures.
change to a brown pigment during storage. Therefore, Journal of Food Engineering, 44(3), 181189.
HMF was proposed as a useful indicator to determine Chen, H. E., Peng, H. Y., & Chen, B. H. (1995). Changes of
carotenoids, color and vitamin A contents during processing of
the change of color in the pineapple juice (Table 4). carrot juice. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 43(7),
19121918.
Cohen, E., Birk, Y., Mannheim, C. H., & Saguy, I. S. (1998). A rapid
method to monitor quality of apple juice during thermal process-
4. Conclusions
ing. Leb-ensmittel-Wissenschaft und-Technologie, 31(78), 612616.
Fontana, A. J., Howard, L., Criddle, R. S., Hansen, L. D., &
The quality degradation of pineapple juice due to heat Wilhelmsen, E. (1993). Kinetics of deterioration of pineapple
treatment was studied at temperatures ranging from 55 concentrate. Journal of Food Science, 58(6), 14111417.
M. Rattanathanalerk et al. / Journal of Food Engineering 66 (2005) 259265 265

Garza, S., Ibarz, A., Pagan, J., & Giner, J. (1999). Non-enzymatic Mehrlich, F. P., & Felton, G. E. (1980). Pineapple juice. In P. E.
browning in peach puree during heating. Food Research Interna- Nelson & D. K. Tressler (Eds.), Fruit and vegetable processing
tional, 32(5), 335343. technology (3rd ed., pp. 180211). Connecticut: The AVI Publish-
Gogus, F., Bozkurt, H., & Eren, S. (1998). Kinetics of Maillard ing.
reactions between the major sugars and amino acids of boiled grape Ranganna, S. (1986). Handbook of analysis and quality control for fruit
juice. Leb-ensmittel-Wissenschaft und-Technologie, 31(2), 196200. and vegetable products (2nd ed.). New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill,
Ibarz, A., Pagan, J., & Garza, S. (1999). Kinetic models for color pp. 498510.
changes in pear puree during heating at relatively high tempera- Reyes, F. G. R., Poocharoen, B., & Wrolstad, R. E. (1982). Maillard
tures. Journal of Food Engineering, 39(4), 415422. browning reaction of sugarglycine model systems: Changes in
Lozano, J. E., & Ibarz, A. (1997). Color changes in concentrated fruit sugar concentration, color and appearance. Journal of Food
pulp during heating at high temperatures. Journal of Food Science, 47(4), 13761377.
Engineering, 31(3), 365373. Singleton, V. L., Gortner, W. A., & Young, H. Y. (1961). Carotenoid
Martinez, M. V., & Whitaker, J. R. (1995). The biochemistry and pigments of pineapple fruit. I. Acid-catalyzed isomerization of the
control of enzymatic browning. Trends in Food Science and Pigments. Journal of Food Science, 26(1), 4952.
Technology, 6(6), 195200.

You might also like