Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Faecolith Migrating From The Appendix To Produce Liver Abscess After Subhepatic Laparoscopic Appendectomy
Faecolith Migrating From The Appendix To Produce Liver Abscess After Subhepatic Laparoscopic Appendectomy
201512:47pm] [14]
//blrnas3/cenpro/ApplicationFiles/Journals/SAGE/3B2/TDOJ/Vol00000/150013/APPFile/SG-TDOJ150013.3d (TDO) [PREPRINTER stage]
Short Report
Tropical Doctor
0(0) 14
! The Author(s) 2015
Faecolith migrating from the appendix Reprints and permissions:
sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav
to produce liver abscess after subhepatic DOI: 10.1177/0049475515577749
tdo.sagepub.com
laparoscopic appendectomy
Abstract
The subhepatic position of an appendix may lead to difficulty in diagnosis of appendicitis, its surgical management as well
as bizarre complications. A lost appendicular faecolith is not an uncommon complication due to spillage during the
removal of the appendix or due to perforation. Here we report a case of such a faecolith migrating into the liver
parenchyma following intraoperative hepatic injury, and producing a liver abscess. The calcified lesion seen in the liver
corresponded to a free-lying faecolith on a preoperative computed tomography scan. Liver abscess was presumed to
arise from implantation of this foreign object into the liver parenchyma. Pigtail drainage of abscess was performed with
good result.
Keywords
Appendicular faecolith, subhepatic appendicitis, liver abscess, laparoscopic appendectomy, hepatic injury
Downloaded from tdo.sagepub.com at Kungl Tekniska Hogskolan / Royal Institute of Technology on July 14, 2015
XML Template (2015) [23.3.201512:47pm] [14]
//blrnas3/cenpro/ApplicationFiles/Journals/SAGE/3B2/TDOJ/Vol00000/150013/APPFile/SG-TDOJ150013.3d (TDO) [PREPRINTER stage]
Figure 1. Non-contrast preoperative CT abdomen axial (a) and coronal (b) images show inflammatory changes of acute perforated
appendicitis (long arrow) with appendicolith (short arrows) in subhepatic location.
Figure 2. Contrast CT abdomen axial (a) and coronal (b) images performed 3 weeks after laparoscopic appendectomy. Interval
development of abscess formation in right lobe of liver (long arrows) with chunky calcification (short arrow) and subhepatic
inflammatory changes from previous appendicitis (asterisk). Chunky calcification inside the liver abscess is corresponding to
appendicolith.
Downloaded from tdo.sagepub.com at Kungl Tekniska Hogskolan / Royal Institute of Technology on July 14, 2015
XML Template (2015) [23.3.201512:47pm] [14]
//blrnas3/cenpro/ApplicationFiles/Journals/SAGE/3B2/TDOJ/Vol00000/150013/APPFile/SG-TDOJ150013.3d (TDO) [PREPRINTER stage]
Kumar et al. 3
Conditions such as complicated diverticulitis, appen- damage, shorter hospital stay, faster recovery
dicitis, peritonitis and pancreatitis may cause portal and lesser chance of postoperative infection in uncom-
vein pyaemia and resultant pyogenic liver abscesses.3 plicated appendicitis. However, due to its inherent
Apart from gastrointestinal causes, other causes may limited eld of view, its role in complicated appendicitis
be septicaemia, secondary to hydatid disease, amoebia- is controversial. The revised Society of American
sis, trauma and malignancy.5 Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES)
Iatrogenic liver abscess from direct injury during guidelines concluded that laparoscopic appendectomy
laparoscopy or surgery is known, although implant- can be performed safely in complicated appendicitis.8
ation of appendicolith causing liver abscess related to In our case, the presence of an appendicolith in the
the surgical procedure has not been documented in the liver abscess was conclusive evidence of hepatic injury.
literature the same way it occurred in our index case. Secondary implantation of this foreign body during sur-
Pyogenic liver abscess is not uncommon after open gery is presumed, as preoperative imaging showed no
appendectomy, which occurs secondary to generalised previous focal calcied lesion in the liver. The appear-
bacteraemia from intestinal tract and pyelephlebitis ances of an extraluminal faecolith are of a small high
(portal vein inammation).2 Depending on abscess density outside the bowel with associated inammation
size (>3 cm), location (subcapsular and impending rap- and abscess usually in the pericaecal region and hepator-
ture) and patients clinical condition, combination of enal pouch.911 Other possibilities of calcication
antibiotics and percutaneous drainage procedure developing in a liver abscess are unlikely in a short dur-
should be planned on an urgent basis to reduce mor- ation of 3 weeks. Since the preoperative CT showed
bidity and prevent mortality.5 perforated appendicitis with free extra luminal appendi-
Laparoscopic appendectomy has become a safe, colith, there are high chances that it could have been lost
commonly performed procedure worldwide in the during the dicult subhepatic laparoscopy and dis-
emergency setting, and has now replaced open append- placed towards the liver surface which in turn acted as
ectomy in many settings. It is associated with a shorter a nidus for infection. Retained or dropped appendicolith
hospital stay and fewer chances of wound infection. is not a rare complication occurring due to stone expul-
However, like any other surgical procedure, it is not sion during or before appendectomy. Dropped appendi-
free from complications (overall complication rate coliths like dropped gallstones acts as a nidus for
8.1% versus 10.6 % in open appendectomy), especially infection and later formation of intra-abdominal
in complicated appendicitis.6 The laparoscopic abscess. A patient may present with an intra-abdominal
approach has technical limitation of limited eld of abscess, stula or non-healing surgical wound.9,12 The
visualisation, inadequate lavage, risk of trocar injuries duration between appendectomy and symptoms from
causing bleeding and long learning curve. Open appendicolith can vary from days to years.
appendectomy is associated with various complications
like increased tissue damage, longer hospital stay and
postoperative recovery, and also diculty of access
Conclusion
using conventional right iliac fossa approach for abnor- Liver abscess due to migration of an appendicular
mal anatomical sites. Irrespective of the technique, faecolith into the liver parenchyma following direct
common complications are intra- and postoperative hepatic injury during a laparoscopic excision of a sub-
infection, intestinal obstruction, incomplete removal hepatic appendix is suciently bizarre and is added to
of inamed appendix, visceral injury and haemorrhage. the long list of possible complications of appendicec-
Less common complications are related to the tech- tomy. This complication could, however, easily have
nique of procedure itself, anaesthesia and port site been avoided if the rst surgeon had paid attention
defects. Direct visceral injury to small and large to the free-lying faecolith visible on the initial CT
bowel, ureter and urinary bladder has been reported scan and had made an attempt to locate and remove
in the literature, which depends on the location of it. In fact, wherever a perforated appendix is found, a
appendix. The laparsocopic approach has demon- faecolith should always be sought for. This begs the
strated its superiority over the convention appendec- question whether a laparoscopic approach should be
tomy in last decade and it is now preferred choice converted to an open one if the faecolith is not
irrespective of the severity.6,7 found, or whether insertion of a drain is adequate to
Treatment of complicated subhepatic appendicitis allow evacuation of purulent uid likely to collect as a
by a laparoscopic approach is still debatable; however result of a neglected faecolith. There is no specic rec-
recent trend is advocating its use.1 Direct hepatic injury ommendation on this aspect and in our experience, as
during subhepatic appendectomy is rare and often goes long as faecolith is within the appendix, laparoscopic
unnoticed due to spontaneous healing. Laparoscopic appendectomy in expert hands is the preferred
appendectomy has the advantages of less tissue approach and in cases of dropped faecolith, it would
Downloaded from tdo.sagepub.com at Kungl Tekniska Hogskolan / Royal Institute of Technology on July 14, 2015
XML Template (2015) [23.3.201512:47pm] [14]
//blrnas3/cenpro/ApplicationFiles/Journals/SAGE/3B2/TDOJ/Vol00000/150013/APPFile/SG-TDOJ150013.3d (TDO) [PREPRINTER stage]
be better to opt for open appendectomy if it is known 6. Tiwari MM, Reynoso JF, Tsang AW and Oleynikov D.
preoperatively. Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic and open
appendectomy in management of uncomplicated and
Competing interests complicated appendicitis. Ann Surg 2011; 254: 927932.
7. Jiang X, Meng HB, Zhou DL, Ding WX and Lu LS.
All the authors have seen the manuscript and approve it for Comparison of clinical outcomes of open, laparoscopic
submission. The authors have no competing interest in the and single port appendicectomies. Ann R Coll Surg Engl
publication of the manuscript to declare. 2013; 95: 468472.
8. Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic
Funding Surgeons (SAGES) guidelines. Guidelines for laparoscopic
This research received no specic grant from any funding appendectomy. Los Angeles, CA: SAGES, 2009.
agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-prot sectors. Available at: http://www.sages.org/publications/guide-
lines/guidelines-for-laparoscopic-appendectomy.
References 9. Singh AK, Hahn PF, Gervais D, Vijayraghavan G and
Mueller PR. Dropped appendicolith: CT findings and
1. Ball WR and Privitera A. Subhepatic appendicitis: a diag-
implications for management. Am J Roentgenol 2008;
nostic dilemma. BMJ Case Rep 2013; 18: 2013009454.
190: 707711.
2. Belkahla N, Maamouri N, Ouerghi H, Cheikh I, Nouira
10. Vyas RC, Sides C, Klein DJ, Reddy SY and Santos MC.
K, Khalfallah T, et al. [Phlegmonous appendicitis revealed
The ectopic appendicolith from perforated appendicitis
by pyogenic liver abscesses]. Tunis Med 2007; 85: 596599.
as a cause of tubo-ovarian abscess. Pediatr Radiol 2008;
3. Witkin LR, Nguyen HT, Silberstein CE, Fayad LM and
38: 10061008.
McFarland EG. Abscess after a laparoscopic appendec-
11. Black MT, Ha BY, Kang YS and Garland AM.
tomy presenting as low back pain in a professional athlete.
Perihepatic abscess caused by dropped appendicoliths
Sports Health 2011; 3: 4145.
following laparoscopic appendectomy: sonographic find-
4. Kurland JE and Brann OS. Pyogenic and amebic liver
ings. J Clin Ultrasound 2013; 41: 366369.
abscesses. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2004; 6: 273279.
12. Nitecki S, Karmeli R and Sarr MG. Appendiceal calculi
5. Zerem E and Susic A. Multiple pyogenic liver abscesses
and fecaliths as indications for appendectomy. Surg
formed after appendectomy: the role of percutaneous
Gynecol Obstet 1990; 171: 185188.
drainage in a critically ill patient. Acta Med Acad 2012;
41: 210213.
Downloaded from tdo.sagepub.com at Kungl Tekniska Hogskolan / Royal Institute of Technology on July 14, 2015