Professional Documents
Culture Documents
36497)
Test case:
User checks the calculation tab and that the KRP (*2) is shown: 8'064.-
It is not the value of RDP, that is shown on the expenses tab.
User opens calculation sheet.
1. In the top part under expenses the value from expenses is shown "Prmienpauschale
Krankenversicherung (IPV)
2. User checks the additional text between the calculation part and the benefit part.
3. User checks the values in the benefit part, that it is the KRP and not the RDP of the expenses
tab.
Sie haben Anspruch auf die volle Vergtung der individuellen Prmienverbilligung fr die obligatorische
Krankenpflegeversicherung. Der Pauschalbetrag die massgebende Richtprmie (vgl. 5 und 7 Abs. 2
des Gesetzes ber die individuelle Prmienverbilligung in der Krankenpflegeversicherung, IPVG) wird
direkt an die Krankenversicherung ausbezahlt. Diese wird Ihnen eine Abrechnung zustellen.
User creates another period 05.2017 12.2017 and copies the data of existing period from 01.2018
User checks, that on the calculation tab there is shown the value of RDP, which is the same as on the
expenses tab 9'024.- (because the period is for 2017)
User opens calculation sheet and checks, that all values related to health insurance lumpsum are of the
RDP (9'024.-)
User checks, that no test is shown in between the calculation part and the benefit part.
User saves the benefit, accounting and decree tab and does an preview on the decree.
1. User checks, that the decreed values for 2017 are from RDP (752).
2. User checks, that the decreed values for 2018 are from the KRP (672)