Chapter 8 Design of Walls 8.0 NOTATION a Deffection due to slenderness of wall a; Distances from compression face to centroid of layers of concrete in ‘compression % Distances from compression face to centroid of layers of tensile reinforcement A Area bounded by median line of wall in closed cell Ae Net area of concrete in a section of wall Ac Centroid of compression in a wall section Ay ‘Area of steel in shear reinforcement placed horizontally in in-plane direction Ar Centroid of tensile steel in a wall section Ay Area of steel in shear reinforcement placed vertically Ag Area of steel in compression in a section of wall Ay Total area of stee! in tension in a wall section for in-plane bending has Total area of stec! in tension in a wall section for out-of-plane bending A Layers of tensile steel reinforcement in wall for stress analysis Ay Layers of compressive steel reinforcement in wall for stress analysis b Actual width of flange of a shear wall > ‘Unit width of wall for out-of-plane bending de Effective width of flange of a shear wall B Plan length of wall for the computation of moment of inertia c Coefficient to determine torsional stiffness of a rectangular section G ‘Torsional stiffness of a rectangular section a Effective depth from compression face to centroid of tensile steel a Effective depth of tensile steel in wall for in-plane bending 4, Effective depth of tensile stec! in wall for out-of-plane bending e Eccentricity of load on wall section for in-plane bending es Slenderness coefficient of slender braced plain wall e Resultant eccentricity of all loads at right angles to plane of wall ea Resultant eccentricity of loads at top of wall ea Resultant eccentricity of loads at bottom of wall E Modulus of elasticity fe Stress in concrete compression £ Characteristic yield strength of reinforcement fa Characteristic cube strength of concrete at 28 days fa ‘Tensile stress in steel reinforcement 355356 Reinforced Concrete Vov Modulus of rigidity ness of wall ness of flange of a shear wall section ‘Thickness of web of a shear wall section Height of wall Effective height of wall Clear height of wall Torsional stiffness of a closed cell structure Factor to determine additional moment due to stenderness Length of wall in in-plane direction Modular ratio E/E. Applied bending, moment on a concrete section Modified applied moment to account for axial toad. In-plane applied bending moment in a wall section Out-of-plane bending moment in wall about horizontal plane Out-of plane bending moment in wall about vertical plane Additional bending moment in out-of-plane direction due to slenderness ‘Total design ultimate axial load on a wall Axial load In-plane axial load due to out-of-plane loading on wall panel Percentage of tensile steel for in-plane bending of wall Percentage of tensile steel for out-of plane bending of wall Shear flow in components of a closed cell (KN/m) In-plane shear flow due to torsion in a closed cell Restraint factor Median length of wall Spacing of horizontal shear reinforcement to resist in-plane shear Spacing of vertical shear reinforcement to resist in-plane shear Torsion (kNm) Shear stress in eonerete wall section due to Vi Design concrete shear stress in wall section for in-plane bending Design concrete shear stress in wall section for out-of-plane bending Shear stress in concrete wall section due t Vow Modified design concrete shear stress for in-plane bending Modified design concrete shear stress for out-of-plane bending Combined in-plane flexural shear and torsional shear Incplane shear force in a wall section Shear resistance of shear reinforcement for in-plane shear Shear resistance of shear reinforcement for out-of-plane shear ‘Available concrete shear strength for in-plane bending after allowing for Vor Available concrete shear strength for out-of-plane bending after allowing for ¥, ‘Ovtof plane shear about horizontal plane Out-ot plane shear about vertical plane Depth of neutral axis from compression face Shear flow in the components of a closed cell (kN/m) Depth of lever armof Walls 357 Coefficient to determine effective height of wall Factor for determination of deflection due to slenderness of wall Rate of twist (radians per metre length of member) Factor to determine effective width of flange of shear wall oun 8.1 ANALYSIS OF WALLS 8.1.1 Walls and properties of walls 8.1.1.1 Definitions ELEVATION OF WALL al }_t» =} 8K 8/1 Plan and levation of PLAN OF WALL Watt is a vertical load-bearing member whose length exceeds four times its thickness, Unbraced wall is designed to carry lateral loads (horizontal loads) in addition to vertical loads. Braced wall does not carry any lateral loads (horizontal loads). All hori= zontal loads are carried by principal structural bracings of lateral supports Reinforced wall contains at least the minimum quantities of reinforcement. Plain wall contains either no reinforcement or Jess than the minimum quantity of reinforcement.358 Reinforced Concrete ‘Stocky wall is where the effective height (H,) divided by the thickness (/) does not exceed 15 for a braced wall and 10 for an unbraced wall. Slender wall is a wall other than a stocky wall, BALZ Effective heights 8.1.1.2.1 Reinforced wall — monolithic construction t 1 Hol + roNOL THC ‘CoN TRUCTION z SK 8/2 Wall monolithically constructed with slab and t ‘foundation, He = BH where Ho = clear height of wall. ‘Values of fi) for braced walls End condition at top End condition at bottom 1 2 0278 0.80 080 oss Values of f for unbraced walls. End condition at top End condition at bottom 1 2 1 12 13 3 13 1sDesign of Walls , | Dh, He) hi -0 conotrion Oma 2 Oa) 1 | Dak he wl ba) eno conorrion Sov Dy t ae Dssho He} —— LP eno conomion ! Da> ho WALL FXED 10 FOUNDATION om SK 8/3 Wall/stab construction WALLS MONOLITHIC WITH SLAB OR showing end conditions DAT 8.1122 Reinforced wall — simply supported construction He =0.75H, for braced wall where lateral support resists lateral move- ‘ment and rotation He= Hq for braved walls where lateral supports resist lateral movement Hy = 15H, for unbraced wall with a roof slab or a floor slab at top Hg = 20H, for unbraced wall with other forms of construction at top360 Reinforced Concrete 4 Sk 8/4 Slab simply supported on wall 8.1.1.2.3 Reinforced wall — cantilever construction He 2.0H, — for moment connection at foundation 8.1124 Braced plain wall With translation and rotation restraint at any lateral support: H. = 0.75H, With translation restraint only at any lateral support He= He Cantilever construction: | SK 8/5 Cantilever wall = 2H, for rotational and lateral restraint at foundation361 5 Unbraced plain wall Supporting a roof or a floor slab: He = SH For other walls with lateral restrains: He = 20H, For cantilever plain wall: He = 3.0H, 8.1.1.3 Effective width of flanges for in-plane bending ‘The effective width is width of wall perpendicular to direction of horizontal loading which is considered as effective as compression flange, and also vertical reinforcement provided in this width acts in tension as in tension flange. These factors for effective width are based on the recommendations in BS 5400: Part 5.0 ie al} - —— - — - be \ | | Me i265 *s ~ [RS pats 1M | 4] -— SK 816 Elfctve width of ange on plan of wall SK 8/7 Efestive wth of lanes ofa eoned arrangement cellon pl n,n | Py rar % be oa . tt le 1 cee ; oi | be Efe LL SK a8 Elective with of fangs of channel SK 89 Etfsctve width of anges of «chanel shaped shear wall on plan, shaped shear wall on plan,362 Reinforced Concrete bes o pete bs ACTUAL WIOTH ACTUAL WIOTH Note: be SK 8/10 Effective width of flanges fof an Feshaped shear wall on plan, From diagrams of typical shear wall sections: bey = 0.85 phy ba = woo bes = 0.85 pbs bea = 0.85 pu bes = 0.85 bs bea = Wo Effective breadth ratio w for shear walls (see BS 5400: Part 5), DIH Uniformly distributed loading Point loading at top Camtilever Continuous Cantilever Continuous wall wall wall wall °o Lo. 10. 10 10 0.05 0.2 on ost 0.84 0.10 0.68 0.58 0.80 0.67 020 0.s2 oat 0.67 0.9 0.40 035 024 0.49 0.30 0.60 027 0.15, 0.38 0.9 0.80 021 0.12 0.30 od 1.00 0.18, oul 0.28 0.2 ‘actual width of flange height of cantilever walls, or ‘= half height between monolithic horizontal restr for continuous walls ‘The flange width limitations by use of a factor y are required to take into account shear lag effects. For ultimate limit state analysis, effects of shear lag in compression flange are sometimes ignored, but effective tension reinforcement in flange for in-plane bending should be limited within effective flange width as given by above expressions.Design of Walls 363, Mv ! _|! | a ‘SK 8/11 Cantilever shear wall ‘SK 8/12 Continuous shear wall. 8.1.14 Moment of inertia and shear area ‘The moment of inertia and shear area to be used for the computation of deflections of a cantilever shear wall structure and also for input to a ‘computer program with a view to finding the interaction with other walls and frame structures could follow the typical suggestions given below. Type 1 shear wall ay SK 8/13 Type 1 shear wal. _——— | for horizontal force H, 1 1 Jy = yyhnBh + nt364 Reinforced Concrete a Shear area = 0.8 (By + Byhs) For horizontal force H,, he Nowe: ‘SK 8/14 Type 2 shear wall, For horizontal force Hy, 1 by = 55 Oni) = 35 nw) Shear area = 0.8 (24,8) For horizontal foree Hy, 1 ona 1 = 5 ha One), Shear area = 0.8 (2h;B:) ‘The above philosophy may be applied to any shape and size of shear wal layout in a building. The stifiness of walls lying parallel to the direction of, Joading may only be included in the computation ‘The flanges of the shear walls have been ignored, as in T-beams in building frames, because the horizontal loads are generally of a reversible natureDesign of Walls 365 eee SS and concrete in alternate flanges goes into tension. Considering cracked section moment of inertia including effective width of compression flanges does not produce too dissimilar results ‘The out-of-plane stiffness of walls may be ignored in the global 3-D. frame analysis. 1S. Torsional stiffness 8.1.5.1 Open cell shear wall SK 8/15 Open cell shear wall —— Note: ‘The torsional stiffness of individual wall elements should be added. ‘The torsional stiffness of the open cell as a whole is C= chi, + cah3By + eshBy Values of coefficient « Bho Ls 2 3 3 10 ¢ O14 020023 0.26 02903 Ina global 3-D model cach wall of the open cell shear wall may be modelled separately as vertical stiffness elements. The property of each wall will then include the individual torsional stiffness expressed as C= ch°B. 8.1.1.5.2 Single closed cell shear wall Torsional stiffness,366 Reinforced Concrete OF WALL a OF WALL, bee ZiZ |r be hy Lo sees fo frectculation ‘SK 8/16 Single closed cell shear bf forsanat sities wall A= B,Bz (atea bounded by median line) T= 2Aq where T= torsion applied 4q = shear flow (kN/m). SK 8/17 Closed irregular cell section subject to torsion, ‘The general formula for any single closed cell is given by: area bounded by median line of wall thickness thickness of wall ‘median length of wallDesign of Walls 367 where T= torque applied = 24q G = modulus of rigidity = E/2(1 + w) modulus of elasticity 4 = shear flow (kN/m).. B.1.15.3° Mult-cell closed shear wall ‘rate of twist in radians per metre length = (q/24G) [(ds/t) | x ‘SK 8/18 Closed multiple-cell section subject to torsion, General equation for unit twist of one cell: agal® [F-% pee For compatibility, assume 8, ~ XsPusss = 24,60 Xap + Xvi ~ Xie wise From this general equation: Xp. ~ Xpia n ~ Xipia +Xipr - Xipaa = Ad — XieaPaani + Xi Prt ~ XiDuton fo Pamtan + Xan Solving for the unknowns T= 468 AX! When 7 is known, @ can be found, the above matrix gives values of Xj to X;,368 Reinforced Concrete Tse Jisiey 4 Axi Shear flow, X, = 2G8X} Xi inn = i Xi 8.1.2. Modelling for structural analysis 8.1.2.1 Global analysis for in-plane forces Modelling as individual walls Each individual wall can be modelled as a vertical beam element with properties as described in Section 8.1.1.4 and 8.1.1.5. BEAM ELEMENTS ENT BEAM ELEMENT ! 1 ea eae 2X48 A ded ct comened vee Senn tesa ‘SK 8/19 Walls of a shear wall system converted to equivalent beam clements. Modelling as a combined unit ‘A set of walls can be combined to be represented by one beam clement. In this case the property of this beam element will be the summation of properties for individual walls. The representative beam element may be located at the CG of the wall configuration. In the case of closed cell shear wall structure the equivalent torsional stiffness will not be the sum of the individual torsional stiffnesses of the walls. The equivalent torsional stiffness will be found as per Section 8.1.1.5.2, When a closed cell shear wall structure is modelled as indi wall elements, then the torsional stifiness parameters for these individual wall clements will be considered as negligible. A separate single beamDesign of Walls 369 ‘SK 8/21 Cell converted 10 a ‘combination of flevural and torsional elements, ‘BEAM TORSIONAL ELEMENT ' clement must be modelled (o represent the torsional stiffness of the closed cell system. This beam element will have no bending or shear stiffness but only torsional stiffness. This element may be placed at the CG of the closed cell structure. ‘This separate torsional beam element will be con- nected by rigid offsets with the individual wall bending elements. ‘The design of walls should be carried out on an individual wall basis. ‘The determination of individual wall moments and shears from the rep- resentative single beam element will be carried out by using the relative bending and shear stiffnesses of individual walls. 8.1.2.2 Local analysis for out-of-plane forces Out-of-plane forces on the wall may be due to the following: ‘© Eccentric dead and live load, Wind pressure on wall panel, Earthquake wall mass excitation, Earth pressure on wall face. Water pressure on wall face. ‘Thermal gradient across wall thickness Local analyses should be carried out using appropriate boundary conditions. Published tables may be used to find out-of-plane bending moments and shears. Combined bending moment triads using the Wood Armer principle should be used to find the reinforcement requirement. For out-of-plane local analyses, follow the general guidelines in Section 3.1 Fora complicated wall geometry, wall panels in the out-of-plane direction may be modelled using hypothetical grillage elements using for solution a arillage suite of a computer software.310 Reinforced Concrete 8.2. STEP-BY-STEP DESIGN PROCEDURE FOR WALLS Step 1 Find properties of wall system Find moment of inertia and shear area (follow Section 8.1.1.4). Step 2 Find torsional stiffness of wall system Follow Section 8.1.1.5. Step 3 Carry out modelling for analysis Follow Sections 8.1.2.1 and 8.1.2.2 ‘Step 4 Carry out global analysis a ‘SK 8/22 Description of in-plane forces in a wall Find in-plane forces in walls. After analysis the following internal forces should be available for each individual wall section in the system. M, in-plane bending moments = in-plane shear force in-plane shear flow due to torsion axial Load Step § Carry out local analysis Find out-of-plane forces in walls (follow Section 8.1.2.2). ‘After analysis the following internal forces should be available for each individual wall panel in the system.Design of Walls 371 a sowie | 0 Bl {PECECAAE Ff Vou METRE oem} SK 824 Outpt inet fons in awa section SK 8/23 Elevation of a wall panel showing out- of plane moments Mou = out-of-plane bending moment about horizontal plane = out-of plane bending moment about vertical plane ‘out-of-plane shear about horizontal plane Voy = out-of-plane shear about vertical plane Step 6 Carry out combination of loading This should preferably be carried out in a tabular fashion for ceases. The load combinations should be generally as follows: LC = L4DL + LOLL + 1A4EP + L4WP LC; = L0DL + 1.4EP + LWP LC) = 14DL + LAWL + 14BP + LAWP LCy = LODL + 14WL + L4EP + LAWP LCs = 12DL + 1.2L + 1.2WL + L2EP + L2WP srent load Note: Load combinations LC; and LC, should be considered only when dead and live load have beneficial effects. where DL = dead load LL = live or superimposed load WL = wind load or earthquake load WP = water pressure EP = carth pressure. ‘Step 7 Check stenderness of wall Determine type of wall: braced, unbraced, plain or reinforced. Find effective height (follow Section 8.1.1.2.1) He = BH, Check slenderness ratio Helh. For braced reinforced wall with< 1% reinforcement, limit of H./h =40.372. Reinforced Concrete For braced reinforced wall with> 1% reinforcement, limit of Heh = 45, For unbraced reinforced wall and plain wall, imit of H.Jh=30, If Hoth =15 (braced) or 10 (unbraced), then design as a stocky wall. Otherwise, design as slender wall. Step 8 Find effective width of flanges for reinforced wall Follow Section 8.1.1.3. Step 9 Find additional out-of-plane moments about horizontal plane (1) Moments due to minimum eccentricity of 1/20 or 20mm of direct loads from beams and slabs simply supported on wall. (2) Moments due to slenderness of wall. For H_/h > 15 (braced) or >10 (unbraced) Note: Wall braced or unbraced in the transverse direction only to he considered for additional moments. Deficetion due to slenderness of wall, a, = 8 Kh Assume K=1 for conservatism, 1 (He\* som (F) ’ - y \ BRACED WALL ‘mi-maaes2 | | \ GOTH ENDS OF WALL FREE, 10 ROTATE + tet 0 Ini wall moment GRACED WALL UNBRACED WALL SK 8128 Wall aditional moment, SK 8/26 Wal ational moments Additional moment due to slenderness, Musa = Nay where direct ultimate load on wall. Combine this additional moment, Mays, with any other out-of-plane moments obtained from analysis using Figure 3.20 or Figure 3.21 of BS8110; Part 1; 1985.4)Design of Walls 373 Note: ‘These additional moments should be doubled if the wall has only one central layer of reinforcement, iL Lmeematare coe CANTILEVER WALL BRACED WALL UNBRACED WALL SX. 8/28 Wall addtional BOTH ENDS OF WALL RESTRAINED TO ROTATE Mi = Initial Moments inthe wal from analysis, ‘SK 8/27 Wall additional moments. Step 10 Step 1 Step 12 ‘These out-of-plane bending moments and shears are about a horizontal plane. Design stocky braced reinforced wall with approximately symmetrical arrangement of slabs Spans of slab on either side of wall within + 15% and slab subjected to uniform load. Ny < OISfAc + O.6TAhy Where my = total design ultimate axial load on wall. Determine cover to reinforcement Determine cover to reinforcement as per Tables 11.6 and 11.7. Design of reinforced wall ~ rigorous method Using the effective flange widths found in Step 8, find by clastic analysis the stresses in the concrete and steel due to in-plane bending moment and axial load only. (2) Assume initially 0.40% area of steel in wall distributed uniformly in two layers on two faces. (2) Assume a value of x for depth of neutral axis from compression face. (3) Divide compression zone into layers of concrete with depths der, dea. des, ete. and find centres of these layers from compression face dr, ary ders ete. (4) Conveniently group bars in tension zone and find area of groups Avi.374 Reinforced Concrete ‘SK 8/29 A typical example of analysis of a shear wall Aas Ags ete. and also distances of these groups of bars from com- pression Lace, i. drs diy a €UC (5) Find the following: Ayala — x) EAy(a, — x) Si = Ag + (m ~ DAt Are Where Ag = area of concrete in the layer 1 of concrete in com- pression zone area of compressive reinforcement in layer 1 of con- crete in compression zone ‘m= modular ratio = EJ Ey. B(x = adacs Er — aS mEAwa, + ESac mEAy + ES in-plane bending moment ial compression jou Beet r=) ay ADE — aS -») 2a — Ay Ac [E20 asa]Design of Walls 375 (©) Finally check: d fa 1+ fe If xis different from the assumed value then repeat the exercise with 44 new assumed x until convergence is reached. (2) Find final stresses fe and fy after convergence. If fy is greater than 0.87f,. then increase area of steel by proportion ful0.87fy. If fis greater than 0.45fey, then increase thickness of wal. (8) Find revised f, and fig with increased reinforcement. There will be no raced to carry out the iteration to find x with increased reinforcement. LAYER 1 ~ AVERAGE STRESS Laver 2 ~ averace [STRESS fe» ‘SK 8/30 Blastic stress analysis of a shear wal STRESS DIAGRAM (9) Draw stress diagram for in-plane bending moment and direct axi load. Divide wall into unit lengths. Over each unit length convert the average compressive stress in compression zone into a direct load by ‘multiplying with the area of the unit length of wall. This compression force acts in combination with the out-of-plane bending moment in that length of wall. Design reinforcement for out-of-plane bending additional to that already provided in that unit length using Tables 11.8 to 11.17 ~ design tables for rectangular columns. (10) In the tension zone of the wall subject to in-plane bending moment and axial load only, assume the concrete as unstressed, Find reinforce- ‘ment required for out-of-plane bending moment as in an RC beam following Step 10 of Section 2.3. Add this reinforcement to reinforce- ment already provided for in-plane bending moment, If reinforcement provided for in-plane bending is not fully stressed to the ultimate limit of 0.87,, then the residual capacity of this reinforcement may be used to withstand out-of-plane bending moment. Average tensile strain in the tensile flange may be found and converted to an average tensile force in the flange for computation of, reduced shear stress for out-of-plane bending. Conservatively ignore concrete shear resistance in tension flange.376 Reinforced Concrete SK 8/31 Outof plane bending of 2 panel of a wal Note: Each panel of wall should be checked for global loads in both orthogonal directions separately if these loads are not acting simultaneously. The worst reinforcement from cither of the two orthogonal loads will be used, The out-of-plane bending moments for combination with in-plane bending ‘moments are about the horizontal plane. Step 13. Design of reinforced wall ~ simple method be ue Pel SK 8/32. Analysis of a shear wall against in-plane bending Flanged wall = G 4) wramen (5-5 load. t= 0.156 SebDesign of Walls 377 SK 8/33 Analysis of a shear wall ‘against in-plane and os bending. (astra) ~ (oa) This reinforcement will be provided in effective width of flange in two layers as shown, The web of the flanged wall will have the minimum reinforcement unless dictated by out-of-plane bending moments or reinforcement requirement as part of tension flange for other direction of ‘orthogonal load. If x> hg, then follow Step 11 of Section 2.3. The out-of-plane bending about a horizontal plane on either the wall flange or the wall web may be due to the following: (Q) Out-of-plane framing action with supported slab. Q) Slendemess of wall. ) Eccentric loads from beam or slab or any other structure on wall. (4) Coacting horizontal loads on wall panel due to wind, earthquake, water pressure or earth pressure (5) Thermal gradient across wall nes. ‘The reinforcement for the out-of-plane bending moment about a horizontal plane will be calculated as follows. In the compression zone of concrete wall duc to in-plane bending ‘moment, assume that the concrete has already reached the ultimate stage ComRESS10N ZONE DUE 10 fd ress ie less 208 : - yessien 2 oS378 Reinforced Concrete and cannot take any more load. Hence, the bending moment will be resisted by equal amounts of compressive and tensile steel witha lever arm equal to the distance between the two layers of steel. In the tension zone of concrete wall due to in-plane bending moment, assume that the concrete is unstressed and use the beam theory to find reinforcement duc to out-of-plane bending moment. ‘The reinforcement required due to out-of-plane bending moment will be added 10 the reinforcement found for in-plane bending. Step 14 Design of reinforced wall ~ short and squat cantilever ~ deep-beam approach Ber LEVER ARM FOR Mow Ase SS ey 4 [oa Lt tava PLAN, 120/20 ELEVATION SK 8/34 Design of» sear wal by Note ‘deep-beam method. ‘This approach may be used for walls with total height less than or equal to their length, For in-plane bending consider the wall as a deep-beam and follow the deep-beam theory of stress distribution, For horizontal loading to resist in-plane bending moment HH H ra F when Ts 05 H+ 1) cf - when 0.5.< T= 1 ‘Tension reinforcement to be distributed over a length of wall equal to SL - 2H 20 Ge) wen(E- 528) a= (sag) ~ Cosa) ‘The flexural strain in concrete is very small in a short and squat cantilever ‘wall and for all practical purposes may he ignored when designing for theDesign of Walls 379 transverse out-of-plane bending moment. Use the normal beam theory (0 find reinforcement for the transverse out-of-plane bending moment. Add this additional reinforcement for transverse out-of-plane bending moment to reinforcement already found for in-plane bending moment. ‘The out-of-plane bending moment in this context is about the horizontal plane. ‘The flanges of the wall, if present, either in tension or compression may be ignored if this deep-beam approach is used. The shear strains in a wall with the aspect ratios of a deep beam may be high and a conservative approach taking the shear-tag effect would be to ignore the flanges. Step 15 Check shear 0.80 SK 8/35 Design for in-plane shear In plane bending 10044 ad, where _p, = percentage of tensile reinforcement in in-plane direction Ag = reinforcement available to resist in-plane bending 4, = effective depth as shown, w 2 Wri ae O.8V fey = SN/ma? where vj = shear stress due to in-plane bending and torsional shear flow in wall Vi = combined in-plane shear flexural shear + torsional shear = V+ Or (see Step 4).380 Reinforced Concrete vg = design concrete in-plane shear stress depending on py and fo, (See Figs 11.2 to 11.5) Aso T U P (Ue ran of wal Outof-plane bending _ 1A sy Po hd where A,, = reinforcement available to resist out-of-plane bending, ’ = unit length horizontally effective depth in transverse out-of-plane direction percentage of tensile reinforcement in out-of-plane direction. Yeo = design concrete out-of-plane shear stress depending on p, and fay (see Figs 11.2 o 11.5) Vou = out-of-plane shear about a horizontal plane over a unit width b. You « oeys.< 2 Yon = ZOE ss O8V fey = 5IN/may No shear reinforcement is necessary if the following equation is satisfied: Yon <1 Note: In Step 12 and Step 13 the wall is designed as flanged beams for i loading, For out-of-plane shear in the flanges which acts together with the in-plane loading, the check should be carried out separately for compression and tension flange. For compression flange the enhancement of design shear stress due to axial load may be allowed based on average compressive stress. For tension flange the concrete may be conservatively ignored and the shear force will be totally carried by shear reinforcement. Alternatively, average tensile st concrete may be found and the shear stress reduction formula may be used. Step 16 Caleulate shear reinforcement Note: Increase or decrease of design concrete shear stress due to presence of axial load may be allowed following the formula on page 160.Design of Walls 381 SK 8/37 Inplane shear Su reinforcement in walls 5 Note: : L Sh ‘ ees 4 = Som Ne var (1 2)v with shear reinforcement Vis = vile, Provide shear reinforcement in in-plane direction for a shear force equal to (Vi~ Va) and check: (Wi ~ Va) = Vs O.87Anhdi Sy Where Va = shear resistance of horizontal bars in wall for in-plane shear Sk = spacing of horizontal bar in wall Ay, = area of horizontal shear reinforcement fy = characteristic yield strength of reinforcement. Provide equal amount of vertical shear reinforcement with horizontal shear reinforcement. Ae Sy where A, = area of vertical shear reinforcement 'S, = spacing of vertical shear reinforcement. In this Case 1, no shear reinforcement is required for out-of-plane flexure. Provide the shear reinforcement for in-plane shear in addition to other bars required for in-plane and out-of-plane bending moments.382, Reinforced Concrete Yon + Ms where wailable concrete shear stress strength in in-plane direction for use with shear reinforcement available concrete shear stress strength in out-of-plane direction for use with shear reinforcement Ves = ve hd Via io Di Provide shear reinforcement in in-plane dircetion, as in Case 1, which satisfies Wa = (Vi = Va) SK 8/38 Out-of plane shear Feinforeement in walls Unt wath tt eet fe Elevation Side Elevation Plan Note: Step 17 For shear reinforcement in out-of-plane horizontal direction, use links through thickness of wall. For out-of-plane horizontal directional shear, resistance from links, Voy for a unit length b is given by OST Ad Ss where A, = arca of links over a unit width 6 S = vertical spacing of links. Check Vows — = Ve If considerable ductility is required of a shear wall, as in seismic design, the whole shear foree should be carried by reinforcement and the shear capacity of concrete may be ignored if the shear capacity of conerete is exceeded. Check-out-of-plane bending about vertical plane After local analysis of wall panel the bending moments, direct loads and shears about the vertical plane in the panel are obtained,Design of Walls 383 Elevation of Wall Panel tov Ay Nolte Tyo SK 8/99 Ino forss nal Panel ce to ou of plan loading Pan of Wa Pane! Design horizontal reinforcement for flexure of wall panel about a vertical plane. The procedure is the same as in Step 4 of Section 3.3. ‘Check shear stress and reinforcement for shear as in Step 6 of Section 3.3. ‘Step 18 Design of plain (not adequately reinforced) walls (A) Stocky braced plain wall conti | i SK 8/40 Eocentric loading on wall eT he in outtplne direction ere Check my = 03 (t= 2e)fa where my = maximum ultimate axial load per anit length on wall 6, = resultant coventricity of all loads at right angles to plane of wall (minimum value of e, is h/20). (®) Stender braced plain wall Check My $0.3 (ht ~ 2eedfeu and ry $0.3 (ht — 1.2e, — 2ea)fou He 500% where He = effective height (as per Section 8.1.1.2)384 Reinforced Concrete Step 19 Note: Step 20 Step 21 Step 22 (©) Unbraced pain wall Cheek nye 03 (h = 2euNfor and my = 03 | ~ 2 (ena + ees where resultant eccentricity of loads at top of wall resultant eccentricity of loads at bottom of wall Shear check of plain walls Check V = 0.25n, where V = in-plane ultimate shear force per wait length v 2 Check y= 7 = 045 N/m where v= shear stress unit length (mm). A plain wall subjected to in-plane shear should satisfy at least one of the above checks Check minimum reinforcement Minimum compression (vertical) reinforcement in reinforced wal (f= 460Nimm?) of gross cross section 4% Minimum horizontal tension reinforcement to withstand out-of plane loads =0.13% (f, =460Nimm) of gross cross-section on each face 25% (f,=460.N/mm?) of gross Minimum anti-crack reinforcement cross-section Check maximum reinforcement Maximum vertical reinforcement in wall = 4% of gross cross-section Check containment of wall reinforcement For vertical compression reinforcement in walls up to 2% of gross cross- sectional area, use the following minimum horizontal bars: 0.25% of gross concrete area Horizontal bar diameter should be greater than or equal to 4 size of vertical bars but not less than 6mm diameter. For vertical compression reinforcement in walls greater than 2% of gross cross-sectional area, use links through the thickness of wall Dia. of inks = 4a, of vertical bars or 6mm, whichever is greater Spacing of links =2h in horizontal and vertical direction Spacing of links in vertical direction should not be more than 16 times vertical bar diameter.Design of Walls 385 3 aa refs CesT GE HE BSR ER FE 3 PEE H Elevation of walt toeper LL s2 ‘Diar SK 8/41 Detailing rules for wall Plan of alt Step 23 Step 24 Step 25 ‘Any vertical compression bar not enclosed by link should be within 200 mm of a restrained bar. Check early thermal cracking See Step 14 of Section 3.3. Clear spacing of bars in tension Follow Step 13 of Section 3.3. Connections See Chapter 10 8.3. WORKED EXAMPLE. Example 8.1 Step 1 Reinforced concrete cell Design the walls of a reinforced concrete cell which forms part of the horizontal stability system of a building Find properties of wall system Follow Section 8.1.1.4 Stiffness in y-direction Divide the wall cell system into six beam elements located at the centroid of each wall Equivalent beam elements 1, 2, 3 and 4 contribute to stiffness in y-direction.386 Reinforced Concrete Note: Note: Step 2 (ooo | Sh col SK 8/42 Location of flexural vertical beam elements Equant bean een and orn re) t= bx 0 x 1200 = 250! Shear area = 0.8 x 600 x 11200 = 5.38m? Equant bon ent 2 ond 3 ving re) 1 ‘ dem 3 x 400 11.2007 = 46.84 m' Shear area = 0.8 x 400 x 11200 = 3.58m" ‘The moments of inertia and shear area of equivalent beam elements 1, 2, 3, and 4 about the y-axis will be ignored in the analysis. Stiffness in x-direction Equivalent beam elements 5 and 6 contribute to stiffness in x-direction. Equivalent beam elements 5 and 6 (ignoring flanges) 1 2 Shear area = 0.8 x 600 x 24000 = 11.52m* 1, = x 600 x 24000? = 691.2m* ‘The moments of inertia and shear area of equivalent beam clements 5 and 6 about the x-axis will be ignored in the analysis. Find torsional stiffness of wall system Equivalent torsional rigidity element of the closed cell structure may be Jocated at the centroid of the cell.Design of Walls 387 17800 | Wall Nos i [Watt Not en x Wall No2— nansen, SK 8/43 Location of torsional T t vertical beam element 00 ‘0500 | By taking moments of areas about the left-hand edge of the cell, 0.6 x 10 x 0.3 40.4 x 10 x 88-404 x 10 x 13.2 40.6 x 10% 23.7 42x06 x 24 x 12 644tato42x dd = 18m Areas of cells on centreline are as follows: = 106 x 8.5 = 90.1m" 10.6 x 44 = 46.6m? As = 106 x 10.5 = 111.3? = 3 /"enwth of each arm of cell ‘) n= (esa am = CE) (BS) fie 06 72.5 04 Similarly, = 617 m= re") + Cae) + (a n= 10.6 na 5 Pra Gq = % 106 Pas = Gy = 265 Substituting n =3 in the general equations in Section 8.1.1.5.388 Reinforced Conerete Xips — Xia t+ 0= Ar Xipi2 + Xipr ~ Xuprs = Ar 0 — Xipz3 + Xips = As or 72.5Xj — 26.5X3 +0 = 90.1 =26,5X} + 67.7%} — 26.5X5 = 46.6 0 26.5X5 + 79.2N5 = 113 Solving these equations Um = 238m? 4 20ax) MAX) + ADXS + aX) 490.1 x 211 + 46.6 x 2.38 + M13 x 2.2) 2183.5m* It is always useful to check at this stage the torsional r cell, ignoring the internal dividing walls. This gives confidence in the rmumerical accuracy of the analysis. For single outer cel 4a? 1 S(aimy _ 4x 03.4 x 10.67 ~ 2 x 23.410.6) + (2X 10.6/0.6) = 271m This value is very close to the multiple cell rigidity Note: The torsional beam element to be used in the analysis will have negligible moments of inertia and shear area, x % % mal Hiro x CELL ce eu ® ® @ ys SK 8/44 Torsional shear flow % % % diggram, 2 ace CPx a2 aanDesign of Walls 389 OE NIP (2x5 «20x rem Xs Jy ‘Step 3° Carry out modelling for analysis Follow recommendations in Section 8.1.2.1 and 8.1.2.2. Step 4 Carry out global analysis ‘The results of the analysis for different loadings are as follows: Global torsion +50000kNm (clockwise) for horizontal load in y-direction = +40000 kNm (clockwise) for horizontal load in x-direction ee Wall no. Load NV M % Local shear flow ease (KN) (KNm) (KN) (N/m) DL 3180 - 1 Le 1325 ~ WEY) = = 420000 +1700 +7 DL 980 — 2 LL sis - WL) = 413350 + 1200 -2 DL 980 - 3 LL ots - WL) = 413350 +1200 +8 DL 3180 - 4 Lb 1325 — WLO) = 420000 +1700 101 DL 7200 - 5 LL 3125 = WL) = 435000 +3000 +87 DL ‘7200 - 6 ue 3125 - WL) 435000 +3000 Sk 8/45 Elevation ~ Wall 1390 Reinforced Concrete Step S$ Carry out local analysis Find out-of-plane internal forces in wall panels (follow Sect Alter analysis the following internal forces are reported: Wall no. Load Moy You Mov Vow case (Nin/m)—(KN/m)—(kNim/m) (N/mm) DL = = = - ' Au = a = = wh 2 = 28 % DL 20 3 Boo 10 1 WL. 2 30 = = DL = - - - ut 2 = - = WL = = 2% % pL 10 3 Doo 5 1 wh 2 20 = - ‘2000 ES 4 Ce | 5% 46 Eleaon Wal ‘Wall 1 only will be designed as an example, Wall 5 panels are shown in sketch to illustrate the location of lines where results should be available for out-of-plane bending Note: The example shown uses only one value of bending moment and shear per Of interest. In practice, more values along the line will have to be considered. ‘Step 6 Carry out combination of loading ‘Most computer programs used for the analysis will automatically carry out the combination according (o principles described in Step 6 of Section 8.2. Reproduced below is the result of one combination of Wall 1. Load case LC; = L4DL + LAWLDesign of Walls 391 Wall 1 subject to WL (y-direction) In-plane forces (see Siep 4 in Section 8.2): N = 4452kN = IMOKN (97 x 10.6 x 1.4) ‘Out-of-plane forces (see Step 5 in Section 8.2): At line D (WL in y-direction), Mon = 14kNm/m (dead load x 1.4) Vou = 42kN/m (DL x 1.4) On flanges (part of Wall 5 and 6), Mow = 39kNm/m (WL in y-direction) Vou = 36kN/m (WL in y-direction) Step 7 Check slenderness of wall Follow Section 8.1.1.2.1. ‘Type of wall = unbraced, reinforced in the in-plane direction [oe SSK 8/47 Section through Wall 1. es fox = 30Nimm® f= 460N/mm? He= BH, Hg = clear height = 12.0m Monolithic construction at top and bottom of wall. Assume thickness of slab at top is 400mm, End conditions are 1 at bottom and 2 at top. B=13 Hy = 1.3 x 12000 = 15600mm He 15600 k= og 7 26> 10< 30 (limit for unbraced reinforced wall) Design as slender wallReinforced Concrete Step 8 Find effective width of flanges | [2 ay | a ‘effective flange widths. Follow Section 8.1.1.3. Assume the shear wall behaves as a cantilever. 8500 b= SE = 1250 = 12000 6 > Laas #7! y = 053 for loading at top of wall be = yb = 0.53 x 4250 = 2250mm Step 9 Find additional out-of plane moments Wall is assumed braced in the out-of-plane direction. a, = B Kh, He = B Hy = 0.8 x 12000 = 9600 for conservatism. 4, = 0.128h = 76.8mm Mass = Nay (outo-plane) 4452 x 0.0768 342 Tog 7 23kNmim Step 10 Design stocky braced reinforced wall Not applicable.Design of Walls 393 SK 8/49 Moments due to slendernes, Step 11 Determine cover to reinforcement Maximum size of aggregate = 20mm Condition of exposure = mild Grade of concrete = C30 Minimum cement content = 275 kg/m? Nominal cover = 25 mm Step 12 Design of reinforced wall ~ rigorous method ‘SK 8/50 Elastic stress analysis of. Wall 1, ced Out-ot-Plane Made l394 Reinforced Concrete (1) Assume 0.40% reinforcement in wall. ow Reitacenent er mee ath = 22% 10X02 um ‘Use 1200mm? on each face per metre length. (2) Assume a value of x for depth of neutral axis from compression face. = 300mm sumed ©) Die compreson ne ino coment ye of ote (3 Drie cmon sme into een I Se (3 Pt th ening comp thee: S= AC + (mm DAS C= (4 aS G = (4 ~ ahas Cy = (@ ~ X)Ag Cy = (a ~ XQ Ag Number Ap Ay S aoa 4% OG x10) (x10 (x1@) G10) Cx Gx10!%) 1 153 6120 1.62300 36483760 «4.374 1.312 2.772.082 2 0.72 2880 0.75 120) 3648 5280 1.368 1.682 8317 4.392 3 0.72 2880 0.76 2400 3648 6800 0.456 1.094 13.862 9.426 4 S648 8320 19.407 16.147 5 = = = = R648 980 = 952 24,553 6 = = = = 6120 10900 8348 52.699 Totals 2.97 11880 3.14 24300 6.198 4.048 117.658 108.259 2 4.088 10" osm ers) Nee + Ay (r= ADE & = a8 52_x_ 10° x 3000 x (6289 + 9201 — 1735) (O21 ~ 653) x 6.198 x 10° = 3.467 N/mm? feDesign of Walls 395 eee of Walls 398 Lede) 2-0-9 11100 4) (e) ] = ) * ) = 6.198 x 10 — 4452 x 10° (reo! * [Gem = 186.6N/mm? (6) Ge = 219mm i wmf. Secon pronation fr «haley heen St approximation and the check result, Assume x = 270mm After carrying out the same tabular exercise as before it is found that fe = 3.66N/mm? fa = 182.4N/m? Check x = 2570mm. No further iteration is necessary. Check reinforcement in compression flange due to out-of-plane bending Average compressive stress in lange = 403.7 + 2.8) = 3.25N/mm? 2 __fee87 Nimmt SK 8/51 Elastic analysis ~ stress diagram, Js=183 Nien?396 Reinforced Concrete at om, £1 Lees Average compressive stress in reinforcement in flange = 3.25 x 15, form = 15 = 48.75 Nimm? Over a unit length of wall, compressive force, N= 3.25 x 600 = 1950kN ut-of-plane bending moment due to DL. + WL()) + additional moment due to slenderness 299+ 23 ee sep) 5.2 KNm/m Sk 8/52 Section through wall for foutof-plane analysis. Material strengths chosen: See Table 11.8. £ = 0.087 h For = Nominal steel is required as per chart Check reinforcement in tension flange for out-of-plane bending Maximum tensile stress in bar due to implane bending moment = 183N/mm? Maximum allowable ultimate tensile stress in bars Available tensile force in bars per metre length of wall per face of wall = (400 ~ 183) x 1200 (area on each face) = 260.4KN/m Maximum out-of-plane bending moment = 55.2kNm/mDesign of Walls 397 $$ OE Ns 97 M fesbd® 55.2 x 10° 30 x 1000 x 565° = 5.76 x 10° = fas floas-£)] <0 = Vv 09) } = 095d = 537mm ste tree i M582 x10 Required tensile force in bars = Mi = S27 17 109 sks ‘This is less than 260.4kN/m available. Hence, no additional reinforcement is required in tension flange. ‘Step 13, Design of reinforced wall ~ simple method Not required. The design principle is exactly similar to beam design and hhas not been illustrated. ‘Step 14 Design of short and squat cantilever wall ~ deep beam approach Not required, because H/L > 1. Step 15 Check shear ‘SK 8/53 Shear check of Wall As = available tension reinforcement below neutral axis in web ignoring flange 11.2 ~ 2.6) x 2400 20640? = 11200 ~ 300 = 10900:mm (approx.) = 10044 _ 100 x 20640 Trudy ~ 600 10900 a 32%,388 Reinforced Concrete Step 16 Sou = 30N/mm? From Figs 11.2 to 11.5, vg = 0.47 N/mm? combined in-plane shear Vi + Q, = 2380 + 1440 = 3820kN vy 2 Fag = 8S8N/nm Aw = available tension reinforcement for out-of-plane bending = 1200mm"/m (each face) di, = effective depth in out-of-plane direction = 565mm 100A» _ 100 x 1200 Po bd, ~ 1000 X 565 = 0.21% From Figs 11.2 to 11.5, Yeg = O.4N/mm? Vou = out-of-plane shear coating with V, You _ 9.007 8mm? Shear reinforcement is necessary for in-plane shear. 25> 1 Increase of design concrete shear stress due to presence of axial load has been ignored in these calculations but may be allowed as per formula on page 160. Caleutate shear reinforcement oe - (0 07 3820 ~ 3008.4 = SL1.6KN Shear reinforcement is required t0 resist 811.6KN.of Walls 399 Ay _ Vas Sy O87 ___ 816 x 108 © 087 x 460 x 10900 0.19) If Sy, = 300, then Ay, = 300 x 0.19 = 57 mm? which is 29mm? of horizontal bar on each face at 300mm centres, or, 97mm? per metre on each face. Ay _ Ay Ss Vertical shear reinforcement additional to vertical bars provided for bend- ing is required if available vertical bars have no residual capacity. In the web 2400mm*/m vertical bars are available at a maximum average stress level of, say, 160N/mm? (see Step 12). Hence residual capacity available in vertical bars in web = 0.87 x 460 ~ 160 =240N/mm? Modified A,/S, to take into account the residual capacity 119 for fy = 460'N/mm? 460 = 0.19 x 0.87 x = 0.3; 19 x 0.87 x 37 = 0.32 Ay for shear required per metre length of wall = 220mm? (modified) Available vertical bars = 2400mm2/m in web Hence no additional vertical bars are necessary to resist shear in web. No shear reinforcement is required in out-of-plane direction. ‘Step 17 Check out-of-plane bending about vertical plane SK 8/54 Outof plane bending about vertical plane. Moy = 14 x 28 (see Step 5) 39.2kNm/m Vow = 14 x 26 = 36.4kNim400 Reinforced Concrete Step 18 Step 19 ‘Step 20 Step 21 Step 22 ge ee fosbd® 30 X 1000 5507 c= os + (oas- &)] <0 = 0,98d = 522mm M 30.2 x 10° = 82 gr 6mm? Ac Oathe ~ 087 x 460 x 302 = 78MM Add to this reinforcement the horizontal reinforcement required in Step 16 for in-plane shear. ‘Total horizontal reinforcement required on each face (assuming the load WL is reversible in direction) = 187.6 + 97 = 284.6mm?/m , x 10° ~~ bd ~ 1000 x 550 0.07 N/mm? Shear stress is negligible. Design of plain walls Not required, Shear check of plain walls Not required. Check minimum reinforcement Minimum compression vertical reinforcement in wall = (f, = 460N/mm?) ‘This has been provided 0.4% Minimum horizontal tension reinforcement on each face = 013% (fy = 460N/mm?) 00 = 0.13 x 1000 x 0.13 x 1090 x PF = 780mm*/m_ on each face “This amount is greater than horizontal reinforcement found in Step 17, ‘This reinforcement will be adopted Minimum anti-crack reinforcement is 0.25% in both direetions on each face. This has been provided. Check maximum reinforcement Not required Check containment of wall reinforcement Vertical reinforcement is less than 2% of gross conerete area.Design of Walls 401 Hence requirement is to provide horizontal reinforcement equal to 0.2% Of gross cross-sectional area. This is provided. Vertical bar diameter = 20mm. Vil ar ater = 1mm > nm) Step 23 Check early thermal eracking (Crack width limitation = 0.3mm (see Step 14 of Section 3.3) Assume R = 08 at base, T= 32°C f= O8T aR 08 x 32 x 12 x 10° x 0.8 = 2.46 x 10-4 (Check horizontal bars for vertical eracks ‘SK 8/55 Crack width for horizontal bars 10mm @ 100 el. Assume 10mm diameter bars at 100mm centres (785 mm?/m), tq, = 65.9 mm (1.44 x 50 = 5 = 65.7) take x = h/2 Bae Way = Slee we wee te hae 3x 65.7 246 x 10 1» 265.7 = 45) 300 = 0.04mm <0.3mm OK Check vertical bars for horizontal eracks Assume 20mm diameter bars at 250mm centres vertically (1256mm*/m each face).402 Reinforced Concrete Gerst20 - Gnin=25 SF rol | [2s Sk 8/56 Crack width for vertical bars 20mm @ 250 ele. ‘Step 24 Step 25 SK 8/S7 Sketch to find ag, ae, = 120mm 3 x 120 x 2.46 x 10-4 2120 — 28) +300 smm < 03mm OK Woon = 1 (Clear spacings of bars in tension Reinforcement provided is 20mm diameter at 250mm centres both faces vertically and 10mm diameter at 100mm centres both faces horizontally. ‘These spacings satisfy the requirements according to Step 13 of Section 33. Connections Follow Chapter 10.