A study on the characteristics of subsidence due to rock masses collapse

in abandoned mines

, 1)* 03

Abstract
The subsurface displacement monitoring is needed to predict subsidence and prevent disasters
caused by subsidence. To apply the underground measurement actually, monitoring points setting and
data analysis method should be improved. In this study, a numerical analysis was performed using a
section of the subsidence-occurred site. The reliability of numerical model was verified by comparing
the actual subsidence information and the results of analysis. With this verified numerical model, the
measurement point which has high predictability was found among the measurement points. With the
data analysis method using relative displacement variation rate, measured displacements due to rock
masses collapse have been analyzed.

Keywords : The subsurface displacement monitoring, Predict subsidence, a numerical analysis,

Relative displacement variation rate

.
.
.
. ,
, .

: , , ,

1.

.
, . 3
. 3 2
. .


.
.

1) .
*:hkmoon@hanyang.ac.kr

19
 8m . A-A
1 2
. .
3 Table 1
(2008) .
. 6. 3
, , 3

. .
Table 2, 3 .
.
[Table. 1]
. 3

2
(MPa) ()
3
(kN/m ) (GPa)
.
25.48 12 0.20 2.0 40

24.50 5 0.23 1.0 38

2. 23.52 1 0.27 0.02 35

22.52 0.2 0.34 0.01 33

2.1 21.56 0.02 0.35 0 30

24.50 0.02 0.35 0 10

.
[Table. 2]
.
()
. ,
Set 1 69 N84W 40

Set 2 74 N7W 40
.
. Set 3 53 N37E 40
,
Set 4 90 N77E 5
3 3DEC,
,
2 UDEC . Set 5 90 N13W 5

,
Set 6 0 N77E 5
2.2

Fig. 1 . 15012080(m3) [Table. 3]

x N70E , y N20W
. z (GPa) (GPa) () (kPa)

. Fig. 2 7.07 5.55 10 0

20 2014. 12
 .

2.3.2

A-A
. 5, 3 , 53
16
. 03
2m 5m.
[Figure. 1] 3
Fig. 4 .

.

. Sakurai(1997)


.

.
[Figure. 2]
Sakurai Eq. 1 .

2.3 [Table. 4]
(UDEC vs. 3DEC)
2.3.1 UDEC 3DEC
(A-A) Fig. 3 (m) 2.4 1.2 17
.
6 -4 0
(m)

. ,
1.2m
-4m .
A-A 2 3
Table 4 . A-A 2
y
. 47m 2 3
.
2 3
.
2 2.4m

6m . Table 4
2
, 3 [Figure. 3] (A-A)

21
 Warning level
Fig. 8
Warning level . Fig. 8 Stable
region , Warning level region , Warning
level region , Unstable region
. x step
.
[Figure. 4] A-A .
Fig. 4

.

. Table 5

50mm .
50mm
3100step .

[Table. 5]
( , 2004)

[Figure. 5]
100mm
50mm
(,
(Skempton, 1955)
d 0 d1 )
dr
l (1)

dr , d0 , d1
, l d0 d1 . Fig. 5
Eq. 1 .
Fig. 6
.
Fig. 6 Warning level , Warning level
, Warning level .
Sakurai
.
Fig. 7
.
Fig. 8 (a)~(c)
. Fig. 6 RMR [Figure. 6]
, RMR ,
RMR , .

22 2014. 12

Fig. 910 .
.
,
. Fig. 9

.
50mm Warning level 03
[Figure. 7]
Fig. 9(a) Unstable region
. Fig. 9

.
Fig. 9
. Fig. 10

.

Warning level region
.
(a) RMR ,

Warning level region
Fig. 10(c) Fig.
10(a) .

3.

3.1

(b) RMR,
Fig. 11 3 .
3
959040(m ) x N55E, y
N35W z .
(2012)
(1-1) Fig.
12 . 2
. Table 6
5.
.
Moon(1987)
(c) RMR , (, 2005)
[Figure. 8] . 2 ,

23
 (a) l = 2m (a) 5m

(b) l = 7m (b)

(c) l = 12m (c) 5m

[Figure. 9] [Figure. 10]

( : )

24 2014. 12
[Table. 6] 3 ,

.


3
(kN/m )

(GPa)

(MPa) ()
Table 78 .
26.46 2.11 0.27 0.79 33.25
3.2
20.97 0.05 0.38 0 23
22.93 0.5 0.3 0.1 31

3.2.1
(1-1) Fig. 13
03
[Table. 7]
. , 0.31m
()

Set 1 -30 N35W 15
5.5m . 2
Set 2 60 N35W 15
3 Table 9 . 2
Set 3 0 N55E 15
0.75m 3
Set 4 90 N55E 5

Set 5 90 N35W 5
16.5m
.
[Table. 8]
2

(GPa) (GPa) () (kPa)
3 .

15.7 2.7 10 0
3.2.2
1-1 Table 5
100mm .
100mm
5000step
. Fig. 14
3m, 5m .

Fig. 15 .

[Figure. 11] 3 ,
.

. 2

.

. Fig. 15 3
. Fig. 15(a)
100mm
5000step stable region
. Fig. 15(b)
[Figure. 12]

25
 Warning level region
Fig. 15(c)

Warning level region

Unstable region .

.

[Table. 9]
(UDEC vs. 3DEC)

UDEC 3DEC
(a)
(m) 0.75 0.31

16.5 5.5
(m)

(b)

[Figure. 13] (1-1)

(c)

[Figure. 14] 1-1 [Figure. 15]

26 2014. 12
4. , 2008, "
", p. 212.

, 2012, "
", p. 149.
.
, Moon, H. K., 1987, "Elastic moduli of well-jointed rock
masses", Ph. D. Thesis, University of Utah, p. 03
. 284.

. Sakurai. S., 1997, "Lessons learned from field
measurements in tunnelling", Tunnelling and
. underground space technology, Vol. 12, No. 4. pp.
2 3 453-460.
. , 3 2
,
2 3
( ) .


.
.

'
' .

, 2004, " ", p. 243.

, 2005, "
", p. 215.

, , , , 2014, "
",
, Vol. 51, No. 3, pp. 385-394.

27