Peer Review of Moriah Marlowes Article Review

You might also like

You are on page 1of 1

Structural Review:

There is a title that clearly states the topic at hand. From the title, I would think

about how drugs and pregnancy are negatively related, as the paper goes on to inform.

The introduction is very well written. The writing topic (drugs and abortion) that you

reviewed articles about was introduced very well. Throughout the body paragraphs

citation was used both directly and through in-text to talk about the data that was

collected from your sources. The conclusion to this review paper was really thorough. It

evaluated what all the articles were talking about when it comes to drugs and pregnancy,

focusing on how drugs effect pregmancy. The findings in your research were all

conclusive in showing the effects of drugs on pregnancy. The reference list was a little

short, if we have to have at least 10 sources. However, the sources you used were able to

give direct and sufficient information on this topic. The document syle was consistent

throughout the document. The reference list and the in text citations were the same style

for most of the paper. I think when the CDC and American Pregnany Association sources

without dates were used it wouldve been good to use (n.d) to show that it was that

source even more since there were two articles for both orgainizations.

Content:

I think the writing style of this review was easy to read. The writing is coherent to

the topic you chose. The grammmar was error free from what I seen. I agree that the best

way to prevent harm to an unborn child in these circumstances is to stay away from drugs

and alcohol during pregnancy. I really understood the point conveyed through this piece

of writing. I thought you wrote a really good review that has very few errors.

You might also like