( )

)Amirkabir Journal of Science & Research (Mechanical Engineering

Vol. 47, No. 1, Summer 2015, pp. 1-12 )(AJSR - ME

2
1

-1
-2

. 2/23105
( ) Fluent . -
( )Hybrid . Spalart-Allmaras
RNG k- Realizable k- Standard k- SST k- ( .)RSM
4
. .

.
SST RSM .

Email: manifat@yahoo.com
 . -1

] .[1
] .[17
2 %4 ] .[18 ] [23 ] [7-4
Bladwin-Lomax .
Spalart-Allmaras k-
] .[19 )CFD( 1
SST k- .

].[19 .
RSM ].[8



2
] [16
] .[9
.[13].
3 4

] .[10
.

6.3.26 ] [22
].[10
6 ( Spalart-Allmaras, Standard k-,
k-
)Realizable k-, RNG k- , SST k-, RSM
(

) ] .[5 [11] Standard k-


.
] .[12


.

.

7
] .[2
8 9.
5 ] .[13
( )GAMBIT
Realizable k-
.

10 .
k- ].[14
11 %0/3
SST k-


2/23105
] .[15
].[20

-2 ].[16

. 6
 ( :)2 ][20 ( )1 .
( )1 .
90
( )2 ] .[20
( )NURBS .

( :)1 ][20

()
56/4 217/8 ()C

119 196
()Ca

2/23105 151/6 ()Pitch


15 320
()Span

-3
12

( )RANS ].[18
:
ui
0 ()1
xi
:
1
ui u j ui p
t x j x i

u uj
i
u u ( :)1 [20] ym
x j
x j x i x j i j

()2
/t /xj
ui i P i
. < >

. u iu j
.
-4
-1-4
13
 .

.

.
()upwind
14 .

- ( )Green-Gauss node-based
SIMPLEC15
].[18
( :)2
-2-4



] .[18102
120
.


.

] .[18
( :)3
.
-5

()5
. .
].[18
16 ( )2 ()3
. . ( )4
] .[20 ( ) .
].[20
 ] .[2110


. 12 .
d
.
]:[21
A
d ()3
mcells

A m
.
( )3 .
( :)4
( :)3

)m (cells () d
4924 2/68 1
7582 2/16 2
11269 1/77 3
15419 1/51 4
17432 1/42 5
20267 1/32 6
24086 1/21 7
29302 1/10 8
32768 1/04 9
37167 0/97 10
38985 0/95 11
42293 0/91 12
( :)5 ][18

]:[20 -6
Ps Ps
C ps
1 ()4
U 2
2 :
( ) 6 Spalart-Allmaras -
Standard k- -
. RNG k- -
12 5 Realizable k- -
SST k- -
. 8
29302 ()RSM -
.
-7
0/01 . y+
1.
 -8

2/23105.


( )7 ( )12 .

( :)6

() ()

( :)7 () () Spalart-Allmaras

() ()

( :)8 () () Standard k-
 () ()

( :)9 () () Realizable k-

() ()

( :)10 () () RNG k-

() ()

( :)11 () () SST k-
 () ()

( :)12 () () RSM

-1-8
.
( )4 RSM
SST 1 3
. :
17
k- Standard )1 -
.
( )5 . %1 :
1 %10 10 %35 %35 1
Pt Ps U 2 ()5
2
.
( )5
-2-8 1.
)2 -
()L/C= 1

%30
.
3 y m .
0/15
pitch )3 -
0/23 ( )6 ( )8 . L/C= 0/06

.
)4 L/C=0/06 -
 ( :)4 ( )Cps

4 3 2 (1 )

Cps Cps Cps Cps
--- -1/24 --- 0/62 ---- -0/45 --- 1
35/5 -0/80 14/5 0/53 57/8 -0/71 11 1/11 Spalart-Allmaras
51/6 -0/60 30/6 0/43 64/4 -0/74 35 1/35 Standard k-
36/3 -0/79 12/9 0/54 37/8 -0/62 1 1/01 k- Realizable
37/1 -0/78 16/1 0/52 35/6 -0/61 12 1/12 k- RNG
31/4 -0/85 0 0/62 33/3 -0/60 1 1/01 SST k-
31/4 -0/85 8 0/57 28/9 -0/58 1 1/01 RSM

( :)5

4 ( 3 ) 2 ( 1)
Spalart-Allmaras
Standard k-
k- Realizable
k- RNG
SST k-
RSM
( :)8
( :)6
% 30
% 30
y m 0/23
pitch y m
pitch
Q/U
---- 1/1 Q/U
4/4 1/05 Spalart-Allmaras
---- 1/1
3/2 1/03 Spalart-Allmaras
14/2 0/94 Standard k-
14/1 0/95 13/3 1/13 Standard k-
k- Realizable
3/7 1/04 k- Realizable
3/4 1/14 k- RNG
4/7 0/95 k- RNG
1/7 1/12 SST k-
1/3 1/01 SST k-
8/3 1/01 RSM
1/7 0/98 RSM
( )6 ( )8
( :)7
SST k- % 30
. y m 0/15
pitch

Q/U
. ---- 1/1
RSM 11/9 1/23 Spalart-Allmaras
13/8 1/25 Standard k-

11/1 1/22 k- Realizable
.
12/1 1/23 k- RNG
- 10 1/21 SST k-
. RSM 10 1/21 RSM
 SST k-

.
Standard k-
.

.
k- RNG

.
k- Realizable
Standard k-
.

( :)13 SST .
Spalart-Allmaras
-9 k-
.
.
.
.
29302 .
.

RSM SST k-
. SST . SST

k- RSM RSM
SST k- .
RSM
. SST
SST k- ( )13 .
.

-10 .

.
Stephen B. Pope; Turbulent Flows, 1st Edition, ]8[
Cambridge University Press, 2000
Baldwin, B. S., Lomax, H., Thin layer ]9[
approximation and algebraic model for
separated turbulent flows, AIAA 16th
Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Huntsville, Al,
January 1978
S. Djouimaa, L. Messaoudi, Paul W. Giel, ]10[
Transonic turbine blade loading calculations
using different turbulence models: Effects of
reflecting and non-reflecting boundary
conditions, Elsevier journal of Applied
Thermal Engineering, No. 27, pp. 779-787,
2007
B. Launder, D. Spalding, The numerical ]11[
computation of turbulent flows, Comput.
Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng., pp. 269-289, 1974
F. Menter, Performance of popular turbulence ]12[
models for attached and separated adverse
pressure gradient flows, AIAA Journal 30(8),
pp. 2066-2072, 1992
P. Bradshaw, Understanding and prediction of ]13[
turbulent flow, International journal of heat
and fluid flow 18, pp. 45-54, 1997
Shih, W. Liou, A. Shabbir, Z. Yang, J. Zhu, A ]14[
new k- eddy viscosity model for high
Reynolds number turbulent flows: model
development and validation, Technical report
NASA-TM-106721, Institute for
Computational Mechanics in Propulsion and
Center for Modeling of Turbulence and
Transition Lewis Research Center, 1994
F. Menter, Two-equation eddy-viscosity ]15[
turbulence models for engineering
applications, AIAA Journal 32(8), pp. 1598-
1605, 1994
D. Wilcox; Turbulence Modeling for CFD, 2 nd ]16[
Edition, DCW Industries, 2000
B. Lakshminarayana, Fluid Dynamicand Heat ]17[
Transfer of Turbomachinery, John Wiley and
Sons, New York, 1996
D. Lastiwka, Influence of rotor blade scaling ]18[
on the numerical simulation od a high pressure
gas turbine M.A. Thesis, Ottawa-Carleton
Institute for Mechanical and Aerospace
Engineering University of Ottawa, Ottawa,
Ontario, Canada, May 14, 2009
) (
A mm2
C mm
Ca mm
Cps
l
mm
Q m/s
U m/s
ym )1( y
kg/m3
-11
Walsh, P. Fletcher, Gas turbine performance, ]1[
2nd ed. Fairfield, NJ: Blackwell Science Ltd.
and ASME Press; 2004 [chapter 1, pp. 1-60,
chapter 8, pp. 345-366].
M. Mahmoodi, M.R. Ansari, Numerical ]2[
investigation of turbine blade trailing edge flow
ejection effects on mach number distribution of
gas turbine blade surface: using RNG k-
turbulence model, Mechanical and Aerospace
Engineering Journal, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 47-60,
2005
K. Takeishi, M. Matsuura, S. Aoki, T. Sato, ]3[
An experimental study of heat transfer and
film cooling on low aspect ratio turbine
nozzles, Journal of Turbomachinery 112, pp.
448-496, 1990
S. Burguburu, C. Toussaint, G. Leroy, ]4[
Numerical optimization for turbomachinery
blades aerodynamic design using a gradient
method coupled with a Navier-Stokes solver,
ISABE, Vol. 1117, 2001
G. Brereton, T. Shih, Turbulence modeling in ]5[
simulation of gas-turbine flow and heat
transfer, ANNALAS of the New York
Academy of Sciences journal of Heat Transfer
in Gas Turbine Systems, Vol. 934, pp. 52-63,
May 2001
S. Goel, J.I. Cofer, H. Singh, Turbine airfoil ]6[
design optimization, ASME paper 96-GT-158,
1996
S. Y. Cho, E.S. Yoon, B. S. Choi, A study on ]7[
an axial-type 2-D turbine blade shape for
reducing the blade profile loss, KSME
International Journal, Vol. 16, No.8, pp. 1154-
1164, 2002
I. Celik, J. Li, Assessment of numerical
uncertainty for the calculation of turbulent flow
over a backward facing step, International
Numerical Method in Fluids, No.49, pp. 1015-
1031, 2005
Ansys (2006), Fluent 6.3 Users Guide, Ansys
Inc.
]21[ D. Dunn, Snedden, Von Backstrom, ]19[
Turbulence model comparisons for a low
pressure 1.5 stage test turbine, 19th Conference
of the International Society for Air Breathing
Engines, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 7-11
September 2009
]22[
S. W. Lee, B. J. Chae, Effects of squealer rim ]20[
height on aerodynamic losses downstream of a
high-turning turbine rotor blade, Elsevier
journal of Experimental Thermal and Fluid
Science,doi:10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2008.03.
004

-12

1
Algebraic models
2
Computational Fluid Dynamic
3
Leading edge
4
Trailing edge
5
Adverse pressure gradient
6
Secondary Flow
7
Hybrid
8
Structured mesh
9
Unstructured mesh
10
Finite Volume method
11
Turbulent intensity
12
Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes
Equations
13
Implicit
14
Second-order Upwind Scheme
15
Semi-Implicit Pressure Linked
Equations-Consistent
16
Turbulent Length Scale
17
Stagnation point