Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Draft One
Draft One
Ciara MacGinley
Dr. Medina
English 1A-20
5 October 2017
A huge aspect of the American dream is reliant on a system of meritocracy. The belief is
that if one works hard, they shall be successful. However, this is often not the case. Many people
start life with more advantages than others. Whether it be socio-economic class, race or
environment, it is apparent that many of those in the disadvantaged side of these spectrum have
their opportunities and potential limited. The ideology of meritocracy very much aligns with the
American Dream and in definition is ideal. However, in Hayes book The Twilight of the Elites,
Hayes highlights misperceptions of meritocracy and how relying on such a system excludes
many who have the potential to qualify and thrive. By looking at Hayes definition of
meritocracy, the Wes Moores, in The Other Wes Moore, are able to deconstruct common
Although Wes Moore makes no direct comment on meritocracy in The Other Wes Moore,
one can see the two lives of the Wes Moores as an example of the failure of the system of
meritocracy. Moore opens his biography by even admitting the the chilling truth is that his story
could have been mine. The tragedy is that my story could have been his (Moore xi). Because
Wes Moore did experience slight advantages over the other Wes Moore he was able to excel and
become successful. This demonstrates how level playing field is not equal. Hayes points out
many students don't have the same opportunities and chances as others due to their background
MacGinley 2
or environment. Hayes extends on this metaphor and his point by highlighting that the playing
field may be level, but certain kids get to spend nights and weekends practicing on it in advance
of the competition (40). Hayes argues that no matter how hard or how fair the system may
seem, there is no way that every child will be given an equal amount of opportunities which
therefore makes it unfair to claim we are in a system based upon merit. As one can see in the
situation with Wes Moore one gets benefits and opportunities, in return, creating an unlevel
playing field. Hayes points these out potential faults in the system of meritocracy and how it is
unfair to expect two boys who are starting at different places to end in the same place.
A huge factor of Wes Moores success can be attributed to his financial access. Although,
he too came from a lower income neighborhood and was not raised with lots of money, with
great sacrifice Wes Moore did have the ability to attend better schools. Wes commented upon
how he had no idea then, but [he] later found out just what sacrifices [his mom] was talking
about The problem was that military school is not free. Its not even cheap. The price tag for
Valley Forge was even steeper than that for Riverdale (Moore 95). Even though this financial
advantage was created through great sacrifice, Wes Moores opportunities and success are
attributed to his ability to attend Valley Forge. Hayes revealed that the best way to predict a
student's SAT score is to look at his parents' income: the more money they make, the higher the
score is likely to be (Hayes 48). Although Wes Moore was not necessarily extremely wealthy,
the same concept of financial access and opportunity is apparent in both situations. This
monetary challenge is what prevents a lot of students like the other Wes Moore who did not have
money to sacrifice and therefore did not have the educational opportunities. Due to his parents
income he was stuck in his local school and became very easy for him to fall into a life of crime.
MacGinley 3
Hayes commented about the connection of how financial ability and success reveals how these
boys success were deeply connected to how much their parent would financially provide for
them.
Wes Moore was fortunate to attend a very privileged school, Riverdale. For Wes Moores
mom Riverdale was a haven, a place where I could escape my neighborhood and open [his]
horizons. But for [Wes Moore], it was where [he] got lost (Moore 48). It was extremely difficult
for Moore to navigate the two very different worlds he had to alternate in. However his situation
was rare. Often many kids who live in lower income neighborhoods dont have the resources to
attend better school. This creates an unfair distribution of kids of socio-economic demographics.
Hayes states how if one truly believe[s] that the demographics of Hunter represent the
distribution of intelligence in this city, then [one] must believe that the Upper West Side,
Bayside, and Flushing are intrinsically more intelligent than the South Bronx,
Bedford-Stuyvesant, and Washington Height (Hayes 43). At Riverdale, Wes was encouraged by
and attended school in an affluent community, like the Upper West Side, yet he still lived in a
low income neighborhood. It is not until he is totally isolated from his current environment of
crime he is able to break free and thrive. The other Wes Moore was never even exposed to
anything else. The Harsh environment of his neighborhood forced many things upon him and he
had very limited options. They were both surrounded by lots of violence, bad schools, little
money and opportunity except in drug/crime industry. Hayes questions why academic success is
closely related to demographic influence. Environment and monetary access to education has a
huge influence in success. It is unfair to blame the individual when placed in oppressing
environment.
MacGinley 4
Another unfortunate and unfair aspect of meritocracy that works against both men is their
race. Since both men are African American there is higher chance they will come from a lower
income family, single parent family, live in lower income neighborhoods, will get involved with
crime and be racially profiled. In the drug industry white kids were used because they were less
conspicuous and less likely tone stopped by police officers (80). The racial unfairness can be
further seen in the education system. In regard to a new New York Times article, Hayes states
the entering seventh grade class was 12 percent black and 6 percent Hispanic in 1995, but just 3
percent black and 1 percent Hispanic in 2009(Hayes 36) These disproportionate numbers of
diversity have become to be accepted as a norm with little done to change them. Whether it's on
the streets on in the classroom it is apparent that race plays a huge factor and offers certain
advantages and disadvantages. Due to the extremely disproportionate number of people of color
in affluent schools it is apparent that the system of merit can not be properly functioning without
making the argument that people of color are less qualified. If only certain students are attending
good schools and higher education then perception and stereotype will begin to mold into an
extremely monginstic image. This image can perpetuate the low expectation of people of color in
Through the telling of both Wes Moores lives in the biography, The Other Wes Moore,
Hayes theories and ideas of meritocracy align with the lives of these young men. Although both
boys have many similarities, one can see their lives develop and change due to slight benefits the
other may possess, very similar to Hayes claims on why meritocracy is an unreliable system.
Hayes states the resources and environment one is exposed to or has access too has a huge
influence in one's ability to succeed. Wes Moore still faced extreme obstacles, even with his
MacGinley 5
educational opportunities, and is still an exception to the many oppressing statistics Hayes
provides. It is unfortunate how factors, outside one's control, can influence one's access to
education and future potential. Therefore it is unfair to hold onto this idea that one is capable and
always given full opportunity for social mobility. The idea that the American dream is possible
Works Cited
Moore, Wes, 1978-. The Other Wes Moore : One Name, Two Fates. New York :Spiegel & Grau
Hayes, Christopher. Twilight of the Elites: America After Meritocracy. New York: Crown