Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Global Health and Human Development
Global Health and Human Development
Abigail Lopez
HSCI 610
Julie Hernandez
HDI Ranking
The Human Development Index (HDI) assesses the development of a country, which is
determined by three key aspects of human life: a long healthy life, knowledge, and being able to
have a decent standard of living (UNDP, Human Development Index, 2015). Countries are
placed into one of the four human development groups: very high human development, high
human development, medium human development, or low human development. The United
States falls under the very high human development group and ranks at number eight out of all
the countries in the world with Norway taking the lead (ranked at number 1) in the HDI ranking
with an HDI value of 0.944 compared to the United States value of 0.915 (UNDP, Human
Development Report, 2015). The other countries highly ranked are Australia, Switzerland,
Denmark, Netherlands, Germany and Ireland. All of which are ranked higher than the United
States. The countries that follow the United States are Canada and New Zealand.
The Inequality-adjusted Human Development Index (IHDI) is the HDI value adjusted for
inequalities in the three fundamental factors that define development in a country (UNDP,
Human Development Report, 2015). Out of all the countries under the same human development
category, the United States had a significantly higher percentage of inequalities among income
Norway 10.2
Australia 17.7
Switzerland 12.3
Denmark 14.4
Netherlands 11.6
3
Germany 14.1
Ireland 16.3
Life Expectancy
Life expectancy at birth is the number of years a newborn is expected to live if there are
no major health changes in the childs life. The United States life expectancy at birth rates
demonstrates a yearly increase from the years 1980 to 2013. Last year in 2015, the average life
expectancy for both sexes was 79.3 years old (WHO, Life Expectancy Data by Country, 2016).
Major difference in life expectancy is seen among men and women. Worldwide life expectancy
data provided by the World Health Organization (2016) demonstrates that females seem to be
living longer than males. On a public health standpoint, the contrast can be due to women
76
74
72
70
4
74 Male
72
70
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
As previously discussed in the last section on HDI ranking, the IHDI accounts for the
inequalities in the Human Development Index. Life expectancy inequality in the United States
was one of the factors that were significantly higher in comparison to the top eight nations (based
on the HDI ranking) along with income. The economic factor plays a huge role in what resources
are available to the people. Those who are financially struggling may not afford certain
resources, which can bring a toll on their health, resulting in a shorter life span.
5
4
3
2
1
0
Those who lack the knowledge (education) and inability to have a decent standard of
living are unable to live a long healthy life. The very high human development group had the
highest life expectancy rate compared to the other groups. As you go lower in the human
5
development chain, the life expectancy decreases, creating a pattern that can revert back to the
idea of income. Those in the very high human development group have greater access to
resources compared to the other groups, hence, the reason for the trend seen among the four
While the average life expectancy for the very high human development group is 80.5
years old, the United States falls short at an average of 79.3 (WHO, Life Expectancy Data by
Country, 2016). In fact, out of the top ten nations including countries such as Norway, Australia,
Switzerland, Denmark, Netherlands, Germany, Ireland, Canada, and New Zealand, the United
States had the lowest life expectancy at birth for both males and females. Thus, questioning
whether the mistake that the U.S. is making is due to the economic inequalities or ineffective
healthcare.
Every single day hundreds of women die from preventable causes related to childbirth
and pregnancy such as infections, severe bleeding, unsafe abortions or high blood pressure
(WHO, Maternal Mortality, 2015). Last year alone, 303,000 women died due to maternal causes
(WHO, Maternal Mortality, 2015). On the bright side, the Maternal Mortality fact sheet provided
by WHO (2015) showed that the 1990-2015 maternal mortality data displayed a 44% worldwide
6
drop. Same results are seen in the United States; while the rates were slowly increasing from
1990, the rates started to decrease after the year 2010. Therefore, from now on, it is expected to
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015
Based on the Maternal Mortality Country Profiles (2016) on the World Health
Organization website, developed by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the
United Nations Population Division, data shows that the United States has the highest rates of
maternal deaths between the years 1990-2015 in comparison to the top ten countries based on the
HDI rank. United States reached a high rate of almost 600 maternal deaths in one year while the
other countries had rates far less than 100. However, developing countries have exceedingly
higher rates worldwide especially in Africa (WHO, Maternal Mortality, 2015). Lack of access to
healthcare and actually being able to afford the healthcare are reasons to explain the extreme
The same trend seen in the maternal mortality rates is detected in the infant rates. Just as
maternal deaths have been decreasing from the years 1990-2015, so have the infant mortality
rates (WHO, Infant Mortality, n.d.). Annual deaths for children under five were at 8.9 million in
7
1990 compared to 4.5 million in 2015 (WHO, Infant Mortality, n.d.). Comparing all the infant
deaths that occurred in the top eight HDI rank countries previously mentioned between the years
1990-2015, the United States once again had significantly higher rates. However, just as with the
maternal mortality rates, greater rates were seen in the region of Africa (WHO, Infant Mortality,
n.d.). The extreme rates of infant and maternal mortality rates can be due to ineffective or lack of
health care. Infant deaths can be prevented if taken care of before complications start to arise.
However, this involves education and knowledge from the mother as well as the health
Healthcare spending in the United States exceeds that of other highly ranked countries on
the Human Development Index. The World Health Organizations Health Expenditure Per
Capita, By Country 1995-2014 (2016) data showed that in 2014, the United States spent
$9402.54 per capita on healthcare while other high-income countries such as Norway, Australia,
Switzerland, Denmark, Netherlands, Germany, Ireland, Canada, and New Zealand were spending
6000
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
8
Despite all the money the United States invests into healthcare, it is not positively
reflecting in the nations health outcomes. The health results in the United States are poorer
compared to other highly ranked countries. High health spending should correlate to overall good
health outcomes, but in the case of the United States, it does not add up. It comes to show that
the United States has flaws in the healthcare system. The United States may be spending so
much money on one person due to medical technology such as MRIs, CT scans, prescription
drugs or other expensive health procedures. Hence focusing on quantity rather than quality care
9000
Norway
8000
Australia
7000
Switzerland
6000
PPP int. $
Denmark
5000 Netherlands
4000 Germany
3000 Ireland
What I learned
Analyzing the global health statistics emphasized the flaws in our nations health care
system. As one of the top ranked countries in the world, we should be exhibiting better health
outcomes. I was shocked to see how poorly the United States maternal and infant mortality rates
are. Nonetheless, the U.S. is doing better compared to countries in Africa, but not compared to
9
other high- income countries. I knew the United States was spending a lot of money on health
care per capita but I was unaware of the major difference between what the U.S. spends in
comparison to other countries. With almost twice the investment, I would assume the U.S. would
be one of the healthiest countries in the world. Unfortunately, that is not the case. On a personal
note, I think the poor results are due to ineffective health care. People are not receiving the
quality of care they deserve. There are not enough doctors and physicians and there just isnt
enough time to fully express all health concerns with your primary doctor because they are
always rushing. A whole paper can be done on the problems with our healthcare system, but
bottom line is that public health, healthcare professionals, and the government have a lot to work
References
UNDP. (2015). Human Development Index (HDI). Retrieved November 11, 2016, from
http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-index-hdi
UNDP. (2015). Human Development Report. Retrieved November 11, 2016, from
http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/2015_human_development_report.pdfhttp://hdr.und
p.org/en/69206
WHO. (2015, November). Maternal Mortality. Retrieved November 12, 2016, from
http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs348/en/
WHO. (2016, June 30). Health expenditure per capita, by country, 1995-2014. Retrieved
EXPAPCHN?lang=en
WHO. (2016, June 6). Life Expectancy Data by Country. Retrieved November 11, 2016, from
http://apps.who.int/gho/data/node.main.688
WHO. (2016). Maternal Mortality Country Profiles. Retrieved November 11, 2016, from
http://www.who.int/gho/maternal_health/countries/usa.pdf
http://www.who.int/gho/child_health/mortality/neonatal_infant_text/en/