Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dz0 ,R = {z |0 < |z z0 | R } .
Then
X n
f (z) = an (z z0 ) ,
n=
I
1 n1
an = f () ( z0 ) d.
2i Cz0 ,r
P n
If f (z) = n=0 an (z z0 ) , f (z) may be extended by defining f (z0 ) = a0 , and the
resulting function is analytic in |z z0 | R.
P n
If f (z) = n=N an (z z0 ) , N 0, aN 6= 0, f (z) is said to have a zero of order N at
z = z0 . Near z = z0 ,
N
f (z) = (z z0 ) g(z),
where g(z) is analytic in |z z0 | R, g(z0 ) 6= 0.
P n
If f (z) = n=M an (z z0 ) , M 0, aM 6= 0, f (z) is said to have a pole of order M
at z = z0 . Near z = z0 ,
M
f (z) = (z z0 ) g(z),
where g(z) is analytic in |z z0 | R, g(z0 ) 6= 0.
P n
If f (z) = n= an (z z0 ) , an 6= 0 for infinitely many negative n, then f (z) is said
to have an essential singularity at z = z0 .
1
The coefficient of (z z0 ) is called the residue of f (z) at z = z0 , and is written
I
1
Res(f, z = z0 ) = Resf (z)|z=z0 = f () d.
2i Cz0 ,r
Dz0 ,R = {z |0 < |z z0 | R } .
Dz0 ,R = {z |0 < |z z0 | R } .
argument.tex
Suppose that f (z) has a zero of order N > 0, at z = z0 .
N
For z near z0 , f (z) = (z z0 ) g(z), g(z) analytic, and g(z0 ) 6= 0. It follows that
N 1 N
f 0 (z) N (z z0 ) g(z) + (z z0 ) g 0 (z)
= N
f (z) (z z0 ) g(z)
1
= N (z z0 ) + analytic,
so that
f0
Res , z = z0 =N
f
= order of zero at z = z0
Then for r small and positive,
f 0 ()
I
1
d = N.
2i Cz0 ,r f ()
N
There is another interpretation of the number N . For the moment let fN (z) = (z z0 ) .
Follow the arg fN (z) as Cz0 ,r is traversed in the counterclockwise direction. The change
N
in argument of (z z0 ) , denoted by Cz0 ,r arg fN (z) is exactly 2N . This is the first
statement of the Argument Principle:
1
Cz0 ,r arg fN (z) = N
2
= order of zero.
= 2i N.
= 2i order of zero at z = z0 .
1
N= C arg f (z)
2 I z0 ,r
1 f 0 ()
= d
2i Cz0 ,r f ()
argument.tex
Let f (z) be analytic in the punctured disk
Dz0 ,R = {z |0 < |z z0 | R } .
Mimicking the discussion above for zeroes, we obtain for the small circle Cz0 ,r
1
M = C arg f (z)
2 I z0 ,r
1 f 0 ()
= d
2i Cz0 ,r f ()
Z C = N1 + . . . + Nk .
PC = M 1 + . . . + M j .
Then
1
Z C PC = C arg f (z)
2 I
1 f 0 ()
= d.
2i C f ()
Proof. calculate the integral two ways. First take a local antiderivative log (f (z)) to
obtain
f 0 ()
I
1 1
d = C arg f (z).
2i C f () 2
Second take small circles around each zi and wi and the usual cuts from C to to the circles.
In this way, obtain
j k
f 0 () f 0 () f 0 ()
I I I
1 X 1 X 1
d = d + d
2i C f () i=1
2i Czi ,r f () i=1
2i Cwi ,r
f ()
j
X k
X
= Ni Mi
i=1 i=1
= Z C PC .
argument.tex
Corollary. Let C be a simple closed path. Suppose that f (z) is analytic and nonzero on
C and analytic inside C.
List the zeroes of f inside C as z1 , . . . , zk with multiplicities N1 , . . . , Nk , an let
Z C = N1 + . . . + Nk .
Then
1
ZC = C arg f (z)
2 I
1 f 0 ()
= d.
2i C f ()
Briefly stated: Let C be a simple closed path. Suppose that f (z) is analytic and nonzero
on C and analytic inside C. Then
1
C arg f (z) = number of zeroes inside C counting multiplicities.
2
Indices and Winding Numbers
Let C be a simple closed path. Suppose that f (z) is analytic and nonzero on C and
meromorphic inside C. Then w = f (z) = f (z(t)) is a closed path (not necessarily simple).
Call this path f (C). As w traverses f (c), the number of times the argument of w changes by
a multiple of 2 is called the index or winding number of the path f (C). The Argument
Principle says that the winding number of f (C) is ZC PC .
argument.tex