2461 ) 16 04 ( : ) 2 ( 8

( ) Phoenix dactylifera L.
.

- -

- . =
)IAA( = 958<: 9579 /
5
957;:/ 5 6 9 ( )GA3
545:== 545<;9/ ) )ABA ;5=;5
/ 57
: 6
( ) 75 9
9 6
5 ; < 5

( ) 5

>

84
2461 ) 16 04 ( : ) 2 ( 8
( ) 74 69 64
5
( Phoenixdactylifera
) L.


( 5)4 ) Arecaceae (Palmaceae
Palmae 644
4000

Phoenix
5
)6:( Nixon 5)5(dactylifera

)31(Swingle

Metaxenia
Fard No.4

Mosque Al-

)59( GhnaimMuhtaseb



5

Al- Ghnaim
5
)5=( Muhtaseb







( )9



5



( )6< 68 67 6459

85
2461 ) 16 04 ( : ) 2 ( 8

5HPLC





)IAA(Indol -3- acetic acid
)6< 6; 5: 59(
)GA3( Gibbrellic acid

6- Furfuryl amino purine

)ABA ()Kinetine

)Abscisic acid



(5)2


( 5 )12
-5 1.0 5

-6 50 %80
48 59

-7
( )
-8
Rotary flash evaporator
30 %20 (5)7


-9 60
5
Deionized distelled
water
-: Lead >
acetate %40
5%22 5

86
2461 ) 16 04 ( : ) 2 ( 8
9 ; -
5 Centerfuge 12
3000/

< - 60


( )HPLC
5
Liquid Chromatography
Shimadzu Shimadzu
( )pH 2.5
( )HCl
( 5(6 Diethyl
HPLC ether
Retention time Area

5 30
( )Column2504.6 I.D (C-18 15
)mm Absolute methyl
( V/V )mobilephase ( IAA alcohol
) Kinetin ABA GA3 45 5
B( (Acetonitrile >A )
1mM >methanol1%acetic acid + 5
tetrabutylamonum phosphate+400
)ltryethylamine ( )pH <5: %5
/ 1 NaOH
( )6<4 nm Ethyl
74 54 acetate

Injector 5Rheodyn-712
> 15

=

87
2461 ) 16 04 ( : ) 2 ( 8
( ):484 >
-
5 6458 6457



6458/7/= 6457/7/59
(
6458/7/6: 6457/8/:


)
( 5 =)
( ) ()74





54 54
(<)



5
5

54 ( 5

6 5 6 =

= )54
5 > -

54
6458 6457
)6=( Furr Ream

()



5




(; )5
>

= 544
+

88
2461 ) 16 04 ( : ) 2 ( 8
()

)6=( Furr Ream


5

= 544
+

6458
>-



6457

= 544

()


(< /)5






() 5

()

89
2461 ) 16 04 ( : ) 2 ( 8
/
9 8 ( )
4594< 456:6 / 5
Randomized complete
( )GA3 6 9 block design
545:== 545<;9 /
: 65=59
5 /
;5=;5 ) ( Genstat 12thedition
/ (
7 L.S.D. ) Least Significant
: Differences 5)7( %9


5

( )5
(
)




=

( )IAA = 958<: 9579 /


8 < 456:
/ 5
957;:

8:
2461 ) 16 04 ( : ) 2 ( 8

( )1

))ABA ))GA3 ))Kinetin ()IAA

4.625 7.996 0.423 0.349 1

2.841 10.875 0.492 0.342 2

7.971 7.953 1.514 2.406 3

3.496 6.647 0.262 0.268 4

3.084 10.699 0.508 0.271 5

1.430 2.915 0.565 0.337 6

3.661 7.445 3.130 1.335 7

2.781 5.535 1.663 0.581 8

7.042 6.511 0.966 5.359 9

4.964 6.899 5.376 5.486

4.189 7.347 1.49 1.673

0.64 0.74 0.51 0.66

Abbas )57(


;56 -859 / 5
)55(

;8
2461 ) 16 04 ( : ) 2 ( 8

9
( )%::5<4 %;4574 5 757 /


5

)9(
5

Marzouk )68(



)65( Iqbal
- <598

;85=74 - 75;=5 555:= - <549 6659
Zahidi
/
Al- Dhakki Shakri
)59( GhnaimMuhtaseb

-6
5 ()%;457 %;659
Iqbal )66( ( )6
M4
Dhakki ()%86
M3
( )%55
Dhakki : 5
. 6 7 8 9;
2 6<
=
2114 2113
6

(. )21 ( )%<7547
5 7 89
; :
< =

<8
2461 ) 16 04 ( : ) 2 ( 8
6
(. )8 2
)65( Iqbal ()%87.17 %91.82

4
Iqbal )66( 3
Dhakki Zahidi .
Mustafa )69(
-2
Amhat
Aswan ( )2
.




3

()%31.15


. 1 (( )%31.93
)



9 7

( )%23.99 %23.65

1 3

.

5
3 ( )%32.31
( )%46.11 9

.
4 6 9

7

( )%19.47


ABA
5
1 3 5
( )%51.14

=8
2461 ) 16 04 ( : ) 2 ( 8

. 6 7
.

-7

( )2
5





2
52

( %73.4
9
)%71.6
(.)%54.9
3 4 6 7 9
-8 () 2

( )3
( )%75.1 9

( ) %57.6
2114 2113
)58( Al-Khalifah
7
Bacha)59( GhnaimAl-Muhtaseb
8 (
.) 5<(
12.46 12.13 12.17 )

13 ( )
5
.


8 7 ( )26
5
.

94
2461 ) 16 04 ( : ) 2 ( 8
5 31 (
72.23 81.27 85.89)
.
8 5





.
.):(

()54
7
Bacha Iqbal )5<(

( 5)67 (
8 .
)



;





< ( =< 5:5 )
(=) .

Iqbal )65( Iqbal

5 )66(
=


5
Iqbal5)66(

-9 ()

( )7


7 8
( 99.67 97.18
96.53)

95
2461 ) 16 04 ( : ) 2 ( 8

( )2
2462 2460
6457

63.4 66.5 60.3 30.93 32.03 29.82 72.36 68.54 76.18 5

70.6 74.1 67.1 27.27 27.36 27.18 78.69 75.41 81.98 6

56.6 58.2 54.9 31.05 29.80 32.30 76.34 72.28 80.41 7

58.9 63.9 53.8 25.81 27.99 23.63 72.37 60.59 84.15 8

73.4 78.4 68.4 30.18 30.11 30.25 70.30 62.55 78.05 9

60.6 60.6 60.6 25.27 26.71 23.83 82.33 73.85 90.82 :

60.7 56.9 64.6 23.99 28.52 19.47 75.98 69.66 82.30 ;

65.7 58.3 73.0 28.03 30.61 25.45 77.70 82.20 73.19 <

58.4 60.1 56.8 23.65 25.74 21.55 78.03 76.34 79.73 =

64.8 71.1 58.5 24.60 27.03 22.18 79.12 77.66 80.59

64.8 .8:5 28.59 25.56 71.91 80.74

%9L.S.D

13.02 9.21 4.12 7.33 5.18 2.32 8.35 5.90 2.64

6458

96
2461 ) 16 04 ( : ) 2 ( 8

66.3 67.3 65.4 36.87 34.10 39.63 74.50 71.26 77.73 5

75.1 71.5 78.7 35.95 33.87 38.04 83.03 78.99 87.07 6

60.1 63.9 56.4 42.32 40.80 43.83 71.56 63.06 80.06 7

62.1 65.8 58.4 44.97 45.20 44.73 74.66 66.97 82.35 8

69.2 72.9 65.4 46.10 50.14 42.06 66.80 65.80 67.80 9

64.4 57.9 70.8 31.54 37.75 25.33 80.60 74.61 86.59 :

60.9 60.0 61.7 34.30 42.21 26.39 76.11 67.70 84.53 ;

68.2 59.9 76.5 34.74 35.36 34.11 78.43 79.01 77.86 <

57.6 60.3 54.9 30.34 30.48 30.20 79.63 78.35 80.92 =

64.7 66.6 62.9 31.13 33.21 29.06 81.74 81.19 82.30

64.6 65.1 38.31 35.34 72.69 80.72

%5L.S.D

12.81 9.06 4.05 12.76 9.02 4.03 6.88 4.87 2.17

97
2461 ) 16 04 ( : ) 2 ( 8

( )2
24622460

6457

( ) ()

9<.98 58.21 113.57 ;810. 7.28 14.20 5

94.81 70.13 119.49 11.85 8.77 14..94 6

;<456 ;:954 95.47 54547 <557 11.93 7

92.71 63.65 121.76 11.59 7.96 15.22 8

72.23 55.31 89.16 8.97 6.91 11.02 9

=<=59 =::5: <55658 55564 <578 5854: :

==7:. 62.85 136.48 8:12. 7.86 17.06 ;

96.53 68.59 124.48 12.07 8.57 15.56 <

:6.49 76.29 5485=: 7711. 9.54 57556 =

97.08 73.17 120.99 12.13 9.15 15.12

66.00 113.88 8.25 14.22

%9L.S.D

9.838 6.957 3.111 1.238 0.875 0.391

6458 -

( ) ()

98
2461 ) 16 04 ( : ) 2 ( 8

4;90. 759.6 5120.5 11.26 7.45 15.06 5

6<87. 5:66. 4108.4 10.91 8.27 13.55 6

<=554 :9548 6117.1 7<11. <557 14.64 7

690.3 552.5 7128.1 11.29 6.56 16.02 8

4982. 655.1 ==54<5 10.26 6.89 13.62 9

=65<8 9=556 56:59: 555:4 =;57 595<6 :

596.9 559.3 5134.5 12.11 7.41 16.81 ;

898.2 7:61. 6135.1 12.28 7.67 16.89 <

690.5 466.8 8114.2 11.31 8.35 14.28 =

78.:9 :=60. 4132.0 4812. 7.59 16.50

9;60. 9:122. 7.57 15.32

%9L.S.D

15.93 11.27 5.04 1.992 1.408 0.630

5 644<5 -5

ABA Kinetine GA3 IAA

( ) 5 65; -5== 5

5 .

-6 . 1998.

99
2461 ) 16 04 ( : ) 2 ( 8
5 -5( 8
55:6-595 > )6 .
= - .2111. - .
-7
( )Phoenix dactylifera L. .2111.
( ) .
. 488 .
- 5 -8 55=<95
. (
-54 ) 55
.2117 . -9 564555


) (Phoenix dactylifera L.
. 63-54: )1(6 . ( 5 )Phoenix dactylifera L.
-55
.2118. 5 5
-: .1988.

. . (Phoenix
. 71 -59 : )21(2 dactylifera )L.
5 644< 5 -56 . -
.
5 ; - .2119 .
5 .
5
- . 255 .
.
13- Abbas, M. F. ; A. M. Jassim
< - 564495
and Ibrahim, A. O .1995. Effect

of pollen endogenous hormones

on the fruit of the date palm
()Phoenix dactylifera L.

9:
2461 ) 16 04 ( : ) 2 ( 8
18- Bacha, M. A. A.; M.A. Aly; , (Phoenix dactyliferaL.) cv.
R.S. Al-Obeed and Abdul- Hillawi. Basrah J. Agric. Sci.,
Rahman, A. O .2000. 8:33-41.
Compatibility relationships in
14- Al-Khalifah, N.S.2006.
some date palm cultivars
Metaxenia : influence of pollen
(Phoenix dactylifera L.).J. King
on the maternal tissue of fruits of
Saud. Univ. Agric. Sci., 12 (2):
two cultivars of date palm
81-95.
(Phoenix dactyliferaL.) .
19- Ghnaim, H.D. and J. A. Al- Bangladesh J. Bot., 35(2): 151-
Muhtaseb .2006. Effect of pollen 161.
source on yield ,quality and
15 - Al-Muhtaseb, J.A. and H.D.
maturity of Mejhool date palm.
Ghnaim .2006a. Effect of pollen
Jordan J. Agric. Sci., 2(1): 8-15 .
source on yield, quality and
20- Hafez ,O.M.; M. A. Saleh; E. A. maturity of Barhi date palm .
M. Mostafa ; M. M. Naguib and Jordan J. Agric. Sci., 2(2) : 9- 14.
Ashour, N. E .2014. Effect of
16- Al-Obeed, R.S. and A.O. Abdul-
pollen grain sources on yield and
Rahman. 2002. Compatibility
fruit quality of Samany date
relationships within and between
palm. Int. J. Agric. Res., 9(3) :
ten date palm cultivars (Phoenix
164-168 .
dactylifera L.). I-Fruit set and
21- Iqbal, M.2005. Effect of various yield. J. Adv. Agri. Res., 7(4):
dactylifera males and pollination 809-820.
innovation in fruit setting and
17- Al-Obeed, R.S. and S.S.
yield of ( C.V .Dhakki. Ph.D
Soliman .2011. Effect of delaying
thesis , Faculty of Agriculture ,
pollination on bunch weight and
Gomal University , NWFP-
fruit quality of Barhy date palm
Pakistan) .
cultivar under Riyadh condition.
22- Iqbal, M.; A. Ghafoor; Jalal-ud- Am-Euras. J. Agric. & Environ.
Din and Munir, M .2008. Effect Sci., 10 (1): 65-69 .
of different date male pollinizer

9;
2461 ) 16 04 ( : ) 2 ( 8
phylogenetic relationships with
Amhat cv. date palm (Phoenix
dactylifera L.) in Egypt using
RAPD markers. Int. J. Agric.
Res., 9(7) : 331-343.
26- Nixon,R.W.1926. Experiment
with selected pollen
Growers' inst. Rpt., 3:11-14.
27- Omar, A.K. and A.A. El-Abd
.2014. Enhancing date
(Phoenix dactylifera,
productivity, ripening and fruit
quality using selected
palms. Acta Adv. Agric. Sci., 2
(6) : 11-19 .
28- Osman, S.M. ; H.G. Mansour
and Eman, I. E .2010. Effect of
pollen grain sources and some
thinning treatments on fruiting
and fruit characteristics
Zaghloul date palm. J. Appl. Sci.
Res., 6(6) : 722-728.
29- Ream , C.L. and J.R. Furr .1970
. Fruit set of dates as affected by
pollen viability and dust or water
on stigmas .Date Growers Inst
.Rep., 47:11-13 .
30- Shafique, M.; A. Khan ; A. U.
Malik ; M. Shahid ; I. A.
on fruit characteristics and yield
index of date palm (Phoenix
dactylifera L.) (C.V. Zahidi and
Dhakki . Pakistan J. Agric. Res.,
21(4) : 79-85.).
23- Iqbal,M.; Ud-Din.Jalal; M.
Date Muhammad and Mohibullah, K
.2009. Floral characteristics of
the different male date palm and
their response to fruit setting and
palm
yield of CV. Dhakki . Pakistan
L.)
J. Agric. Res., 22 (1-2):36-41.
male 24- Marzouk ,H.M.; A. M. El-Salhy
and Hassan, R. A .2002. Effect
of pollination on fruit set yield
and fruit quality of Zaghloul and
Samany date palm cultivars .(
Evaluation of five seedling date
palm males and their effect on
yield and fruit quality).Proc. of
of
Minia 1st Conference for
Agriculture and Environmental
Science .Minia ,Egypt. March 25-
28, 983-997.
25- Mustafa, E.A.M.; S.A.A. Heiba;
M.M.S. Saleh; N.E. Ashour; D.
A. Mohamed and Abd El-
Migeed, M. M. M .2014. effect of
different Pollinizer sources on
yield, fruit characteristics and
9<
2461 ) 16 04 ( : ) 2 ( 8
Rajwana ; B. A. Saleem ; M.
Amin and Ahmad, I .2011.
Influence of pollen source and
pollination frequency on fruit
drop, yield and quality of date
palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) cv.
Dhakki . Pak. J. Bot., 43(2) :
831-839.

31- Swingle ,W.T .1928. Metaxenia

in date palm possibly a
hormoneaction by the embryo or
endosperm. Heredity, 19:257-
268.

9=
2461 ) 16 04 ( : ) 2 ( 8

Hormonal Content of Pollen grains forSelected Strains of Date

palm( Phoenix dactylifera L.)and TheirInfluence on
Characteristics of Productivity forBarhi and Sayer cultivars
1
Muslim Abd Ali Abdul Hussein Abdul-Kadhim Jawad Musa Al-
Deheimawi2
Hussam Sadldin Mohammed Khierallah3
1Department of Horticulture and Landscape Gardening - Faculty of Agriculture -
University of Kufa - Republic of Iraq
2Agricultural Researches Office - Ministry of Agriculture - Republic of Iraq
3 Date Palm Research Unit - College of Agriculture - University of Baghdad -
Republic of Iraq
Abstract

The study was carried outto study plant hormone contentof Pollen grains for nine
seedling strains of male date palm in addition to Ghannami Akhdarcultivar and
their Influence on Barhi and Sayer cultivars production in Al-Mahaweel date palm
station at province of Babil. Results was shown that the highest content of auxin
(IAA) was recorded in clone 9 and Ghannami Akhdar (5.359 and 5.486
micrograms / kg fresh weight respectively). Ghannami Akhdar also gave the
highest content of Kinetin (5.376 micrograms / kg). While, clone 2 and 5 gave the
highest content of Gibbereline (GA3) (10.875 and 10.699 micrograms/kg
respectively). The highest concentration of Abscisic acid (7.971 micrograms/kg
fresh weight) found in pollen of clone 3.The impact of pollen grains resource in
the qualities of productivity was recorded. Barhi and Sayer fruits hashigher fruit
set when pollinatedwith clone 6 pollen grain in the first season and clone 2 in the
second season.while, clone 3 and clone 1 in the first season and clone 5 in the
second season, recorded the highest fruit abscission percentage .Clone 2 and 5,
gave the highest rate in the maturity of Barhi and Sayer and fruits for both
seasons. Also, clones 7 and 8 and cultivar Ghannami Akhdarrecorded highest
total weight of the raceme and winning. Barhi cultivar was superior than Sayer in

:4
2461 ) 16 04 ( : ) 2 ( 8
traits studied (fruit set , bunch weight and total weight per palm) in the three
stages of maturity Khallal, Rutab and Tamer for both seasons.

Keywords : Date Palm , Hormones , Metaxenia, Barhi , Sayer

* Part of ph.D dissertation of the second author

:5