Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Line of Inquiry Final Draft
Line of Inquiry Final Draft
Emma N. Anderson
Abstract
I chose to research the harm that comes with encouraging females of all ages to participate in
beauty pageants. It is an interesting topic to me, and as I have done more research, I have learned
more reasons people should not praise women for being in pageants. Physical, emotional, and
mental harm is brought on to girls in beauty pageants. This topic is important to raise awareness
on because women and girls who compete in these pageants have low self-esteem and are more
likely to develop eating disorders. By drawing attention to the problem, females suffering from
Beauty pageants gained popularity in the early 20th century when they were used as
casino attractions in Atlantic City. Soon after, pageants such as Miss America and Miss Universe
were created and are still popular among young adult women all over the world. Child pageants
saw a rise in the 1960s, and became more detrimental year after year. Women and girls of all
ages should not be encouraged to perform in beauty pageants because they are harmful to
physical, emotional, and mental health. Women feel the pressure to be as skinny as possible, and
will develop eating disorders so the judges will vote for them to win. Children who compete in
pageants are forced to wear inappropriate clothing and pose in seductive, mature ways. Adults
sexualize these little girls, and they grow up thinking its okay for men to view them that way.
Promoting awareness to beauty pageants and the harm they bring is important as it can hopefully
stop the encouragement of females participating. Child pageant stars grow up with lower self-
esteem and a higher likelihood of developing an eating disorder. Women who compete generally
have a stronger dislike for their bodies and are more likely to view themselves as heavier than
they are.
The article Protecting Pageant Princesses: A Call for Statutory Regulation of Child
Beauty Pageants by Lindsay Lieberman discusses the harm beauty pageants bring to young
girls. It brings in facts about how child actors have strict laws prohibiting them from working
long, strenuous hours, but pageant stars have no such laws. Because they arent working under a
contract and arent earning a paycheck, they dont fit under the broad description of child
performers. Pageant stars only earn money through their success in each pageant; first, second,
and third place usually win cash prizes, but they arent necessarily earned. The article discusses
SHOULD FEMALES BE ENCOUAGRED TO PERFORM IN BEAUTY PAGEANTS?
4
how states with lots of child pageant performers should consider including these young stars in
the regulations.
The article Childhood Beauty Pageant Contestants: Associations with Adult Disordered
Eating and Mental Health by Anna L. Wonderlich, et. al. is a case study that looks at childhood
pageant contestants in their college years to determine if they are more prone to lower self-
esteem. Eleven childhood pageant stars are matched with eleven other girls who did not compete
in pageants as children. They were matched based on age, BMI, and weight to avoid
discrepancies in the results. They took several tests about eating disorders, self-esteem levels,
and ideal body images to see how likely they are to develop an eating disorder or have low body
image standards. The results show that childhood pageant stars were more likely to have low
self-esteem and to view themselves as bigger than they are. Although the results werent
significant, the difference in image was there. Had the study been done with a larger sample size,
The article Perceptions of Child Beauty Pageants and Their Impacts: What Really Lies
Behind the Tiara? by Jessica M. Kelly and Lance C. Garmon, is another case study involving
beauty pageants as the main focus. This study, however, looks at the perceptions people have of
TV shows showing pageants. Kelly and Garmon wanted to see if people with positive
perceptions of pageants were more likely to watch shows such as Toddler and Tiaras. They
studied if personality traits had an impact on the perception of beauty pageants. They
hypothesized that certain personality traits would lead people to watch pageants shows more
often than traits other people have. They thought that individuals would watch televised pageants
because of the entertainment factors above anything else. The results showed former pageant
SHOULD FEMALES BE ENCOUAGRED TO PERFORM IN BEAUTY PAGEANTS?
5
stars to be more likely to watch pageants on TV and to have positive perceptions of them. Past
pageant contestants were less likely to agree that children should have laws regulating their
All three articles information was gathered from hold the viewpoint that beauty pageants
are harmful to females of all ages, but specifically to children. They provide information to show
what girls are forced to go through. Women and girls feel immense pressure to look perfect for
the judges and, so they do not disappoint their parents. The pressure girls feel is shown through
this quote in an article by Lindsey Lieberman (2010), As a result, little girls who participate are
prone to persistent lifetime challenges, including body shame, perfectionism, depression and
eating disorders (p. 740-41). Not only do they feel pressure in the moment, but chronic
disorders can come about as a result of prolonged beauty pageant involvement. An article by
Jessica M. Kelly and Lance C. Garmon (2016) also supports the view that children are treated
poorly so they can win the contests. A quote from their case study explains, Children were
denied naps, reprimanded for poor performance or flaws, threatened with punishment, and given
many Pixy Stix (also known as pageant crack) throughout the day to maintain their energy (p.
203). Parents are so eager to win pageants that they provide their children with unhealthy eating
habits to keep their energy up temporarily. Most children, especially the very young ones, are not
too eager to perform in pageants, yet their parents force them to. Lastly, the third article supports
the claims the first two make about the unhealthy factors pageants bring upon children.
Wonderlich, Ackard, and Henderson concluded in 2005 that, Results from the current study
indicate that women who participated in childhood beauty pageants scored significantly higher
women who did not participate in childhood beauty pageants (p. 297). This study focused on
SHOULD FEMALES BE ENCOUAGRED TO PERFORM IN BEAUTY PAGEANTS?
6
adult women who competed in pageants as children. The quote shows the lasting effects
The articles by Kelly and Garmon and Wonderlich et al. are both case studies looking at how
beauty pageants impact the lives of everyday people. The study by Kelly and Garmon focuses on
how televised pageants affect peoples views of pageants. They made sure to control for females
who watch pageants on TV who also competed as a child. Kelly and Garmon stated in 2016,
Having experience with pageants, whether personally or through family and friends, was related
to perceptions of the pageants as well For NCBPs, these individuals reported even more
favorable perceptions, being more likely to agree that these pageants teach important values and
should also not be banned (p. 213). By NCPB, they are referring to natural child beauty
pageants; those that are harmful to children but not necessarily as much as glitz child beauty
pageants (GCPB). By not being as focused on perfecting a physically immature childs looks as
much as GCPBs, these pageants have a better perception than others. In the study by Wonderlich
et al. their main focus is on past child pageant stars. Of the eleven girls in the study who
competed as children, they found that they were more likely to be dissatisfied with their bodies.
Wonderlich et al. mentioned, Despite being matched on BMI, females who had participated in
beauty pageants perceived their current figure as larger, and preferred their figure to be smaller
than females who had not participated in beauty pageants (p. 296). Women who had not
competed in pageants for years still viewed their bodies as larger than they were. The effects
childhood pageants bring upon women are long lasting and serious.
The main difference between the three articles is that two are case studies and the other is
a journal based work. The article by Lieberman discusses how child pageant stars are not
protected by the laws child actors are. Lieberman (2010) states in her article, Although pageant
SHOULD FEMALES BE ENCOUAGRED TO PERFORM IN BEAUTY PAGEANTS?
7
contestants practice and perform for many hours a day and collect large sums of prize money,
they are not considered "employed" (p. 758). Child actors are not allowed to work for more than
a certain number of hours at once, but pageant stars are protected by that law. They are forced to
practice for hours on end, leading to intense stress and pressure. The other two sources do not
focus on the pressures children feel as much, but more on the sample, procedure, and results of
their study. They provide information found through research they did themselves, and the other
source uses information from other articles and the laws and regulations of some states.
Although all three articles maintain that pageants are harmful, they all focus on different
topics within tat subject. The first article focuses on the child labor laws in states such as
California, New York, and New Mexico. The first case study involves past childhood pageant
stars, and the second one focuses on the effects television has on the perception of beauty
pageants. The case study by Kelly and Garmon (2016) hypothesized, H1: Individuals who
watch televised beauty pageants or shows about beauty pageants will do so because of the
sensation seeking and entertainment motivational factors more than any other factors (p. 204).
The other study had a completely different subject of focus, but both found correlations between
past pageant stars and the perceptions they have of either themselves or televised pageants. The
source by Lieberman provided excellent facts and relationships in her information one may not
have considered.
Before, I thought pageants were harmful to young girls and after reading these sources, I
still maintain that viewpoint, but I have lot more knowledge on the subject. I found the topic
much more interesting than I would have though it to be. The articles I used were all very
informational and provided me with different angles on the subject. The case studies are helpful
because it is upfront research that the authors did themselves. The three sources I used have only
SHOULD FEMALES BE ENCOUAGRED TO PERFORM IN BEAUTY PAGEANTS?
8
strengthened my stance on beauty pageants. I am much more educated on the topic and I have
Works Cited
Kelly, J. M. & Garmon, C. L. (2016) Perceptions of child beauty pageants and their
impacts: What really lies behind the tiara?, Atlantic Journal of Communication, 24:4,
201-215.
Lieberman, L. (2010). Protecting Pageant Princesses: A Call for the Statutory Regulation of
Wonderlich, A. L., Ackard, D. M., & Henderson, J. B. (2005). Childhood Beauty Pageant
Contestants: Associations with Adult Disordered Eating and Mental Health. Eating
Disorders, 8, 291-301.
SHOULD FEMALES BE ENCOUAGRED TO PERFORM IN BEAUTY PAGEANTS?